The United States blocked the proposed draft of the Russian Federation statement on the Middle East conflicts

The draft statement of the chairman of the UN Security Council on settling Middle Eastern and North African conflicts proposed by the Russian office was rejected by the United States due to insurmountable differences, the agency reports REGNUM.




The document was planned to take 30 September at a ministerial meeting on the theme: “Maintaining international peace and security: resolving conflicts in the Middle East and North Africa and combating the terrorist threat in the region”.

Following the discussion of this topic, which will be chaired by Sergei Lavrov, a statement should be adopted reflecting the situation in the region and the measures taken to resolve conflicts.

The Americans refused to discuss the Russian project. “Statement blocked. The Americans said they would not work on our statement, ”said Vitaly Churkin.

As representatives of the American side explained, “the draft of the statement proposed by Russia is significantly different from the position of the United States and the coalition formed by them,” which, according to Washington, includes more than 60 states.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com/
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

38 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Berrik 29 September 2015 08: 34 New
    • 27
    • 0
    +27
    Another confirmation of the correct course chosen by Russia!
    1. The comment was deleted.
      1. Sterlya 29 September 2015 08: 45 New
        • 8
        • 0
        +8
        Quote: anEkeName
        “Maintaining international peace and security: resolving conflicts in the Middle East and North Africa and combating the terrorist threat in the region.”

        So amers do not need world peace.
        1. sl22277 29 September 2015 09: 17 New
          • 4
          • 0
          +4
          Because this does not take into account "the interests of Washington." Russia calls for protecting multinational peoples from annihilation, enslavement and barbarism. And do not impose "peace" and "democracy" with their values. There are wars in the interests of the United States,
          beyond colonies and spheres of influence far from American borders. They come with great benefits for American capital, both financial and political. Therefore, Russia's proposals were rejected.
          1. jjj
            jjj 29 September 2015 09: 28 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            Americans can even block the creation of UN-sponsored international anti-ISIL forces. But in Syria there is a legitimate government that has already turned to states with a request for military assistance. As a result, the influence of Russia and Iran will strengthen in the region. Oil-rich territories will be controlled by other forces
    2. evfrat 29 September 2015 09: 23 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      He said, putting on chemical protection and a gas mask. Will you deal with them yourself or will you have to help?
      1. MIKHAN 29 September 2015 09: 30 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Europe is silent ..? Or wait when the "refugees" with guns will take the migration points ... We will restore order in Syria! And we don’t know ....
    3. Vend 29 September 2015 09: 34 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: Berrik
      Another confirmation of the correct course chosen by Russia!

      Moreover, it clearly shows that the United States does not need peace.
  2. Decathlon 29 September 2015 08: 35 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    "... Application blocked ..."
    No one had the feeling that Syria and I were being left face to face with ISIS ?!
    1. evfrat 29 September 2015 09: 21 New
      • -3
      • 0
      -3
      Or maybe this is what you need? You can’t swim across an ocean with a boat or a wooden trough, you won’t cross a camel and a carpet-plane doesn’t fly further than New York, and even that with an ax. And the baboons already have chemical weapons and specialists. Where are we going?
    2. Vladimir 1964 29 September 2015 12: 27 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: Decathlon
      "... Application blocked ..."
      No one had the feeling that Syria and I were being left face to face with ISIS ?!


      Maxim, to be honest, didn’t quite understand where you came from, or is it more correct to say where you got this idea from?
      The appearance of the GDP at the UN jubilee session was preceded by a series of meetings with leaders of several Middle Eastern states, including Israel, Turkey (conditionally Middle Eastern, rather playing a role there) and Saudi Arabia, plus Iran’s rather “pro-Russian” position, it seems to me that your fears in this issue.

      Well, that's the thought. yes
  3. Alekseev-Orsk 29 September 2015 08: 35 New
    • 13
    • 0
    +13
    And here is the answer to who needs this chaos in the Middle East ....
    1. vovanpain 29 September 2015 08: 39 New
      • 13
      • 0
      +13
      A raven will not peck out a raven's eye. Moreover, its child.
    2. evfrat 29 September 2015 09: 22 New
      • -1
      • 0
      -1
      The answer to the rhetorical question asked of the year in 2001.
  4. Magic archer 29 September 2015 08: 36 New
    • 28
    • 0
    +28
    No words, some mats .... Here you have a one-on-one conversation. It was necessary to quietly give the black people a lyuley, anyway there were no witnesses, but there were no bruises! wink
    1. BilliBoms09 29 September 2015 08: 39 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      What about translators? Well, ours will say he hit the pole himself, but with an American, what should I do? winked
      1. CONTROL 29 September 2015 08: 55 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Quote: BilliBoms09
        What about translators?

        In this situation, the translator can be only one: fire translator!from single to automatic ... And the language of the translation is appropriate! ...
  5. BilliBoms09 29 September 2015 08: 36 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    As the representatives of the American side explained, “the draft statement proposed by Russia diverges substantially from the position of the United States and the coalition formed by them,” which, according to Washington, includes more than 60 states.
    And they read the project, I wonder? Or we will not accept in spite of Russia.
  6. mamont5 29 September 2015 08: 37 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    Quote: Decathlon
    "... Application blocked ..."
    No one had the feeling that Syria and I were being left face to face with ISIS ?!

    One on one we will not. With us are Iran, China and Syria, and the West ... let it not get under your feet, or else they just get in the way, but ambition ... they also "fight".
    1. BilliBoms09 29 September 2015 08: 47 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      and the West ... let it not get confused underfoot, otherwise they just get in the way, but ambition ... they also "fight".
      There is not only the West, but also oil-bearing monarchies, and the IG will win in the future, otherwise they will suddenly win. recourse
  7. Dezinto 29 September 2015 08: 38 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    “Maintaining international peace and security: resolving conflicts in the Middle East and North Africa and combating the terrorist threat in the region.”

    - for the leadership of America in this wording - everything is wrong !!

    Which world? What kind of security? What is conflict resolution? What's wrong? And live on what ???
  8. olimpiada15 29 September 2015 08: 39 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    The United States has once again shown a reluctance to fight terrorism.
    Despite the fact that the results of the activities carried out by the Western coalition have led to the growth of terror and the expansion of the territory occupied by ISIS,
    the West continues its policy, which has already led to the growth of terror.
  9. The comment was deleted.
  10. V.ic 29 September 2015 08: 40 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Well, Baba Yaga, as always against. It would be foolish to doubt the obvious truth. Our and USA's interests are perpendicular, but the Russian Federation is “flat parallel”, because God is not in power, but in truth!
  11. madjik 29 September 2015 08: 42 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    like little children, by golly! laughing
  12. Tatar 174 29 September 2015 08: 51 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    As expected. And then it will be the same until the Man appears in the Washington White House.
  13. MATROSKIN-53 29 September 2015 08: 57 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    It would be strange another decision of the Americans. This is a very expected fact. It was still necessary, like Khokhlov, to raise his mattress and topple ...
  14. roskot 29 September 2015 08: 58 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    The draft statement proposed by the Russian mission of the chairman of the UN Security Council on the settlement of Middle East and North African conflicts was rejected by the United States due to insurmountable differences

    The position is clear. Expect aggravation of conflicts in Syria and Ukraine.
  15. Masya masya 29 September 2015 08: 58 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    They blocked it because the project was proposed by Russia, wretched ...
  16. Alex_T 29 September 2015 09: 00 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    Once again, the US position expressed by J. Friedman is confirmed. The United States will “extinguish” all potential competitors. In this case, wreaking instability and chaos in the Middle East, the Arab world and Europe are weakening.
  17. rotmistr60 29 September 2015 09: 04 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    was rejected by the United States due to insurmountable differences

    This is what was expected. The United States is stubborn like a ram (said luminevo, then luminevo), and they don’t want to lose “their face” without realizing that they screwed up in this region for a long time. Obama in his speech presented this, in the usual vein - as a victory. It would be strange on the contrary if they supported the initiative of Russia.
  18. lunoxod 29 September 2015 09: 09 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    They blocked the application, ours counted on it, they were sure that they would block it.
    The very statement for this was made to expose s once again uro..mi.
  19. Owl
    Owl 29 September 2015 09: 09 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    They showed their true face, one cannot believe the statements: "cooperation in the fight against ISIS ...; are interested in Russia ...", always, and recently, from the late XIX and early XX centuries, the USA and Great Britain have seen in Russia "the enemy who can be an ally. " They need any "cooperation" for: saving their "blood"; sabotage of actions unfavorable for them; “draining” information about joint operations to their “upholders” (ISIS, al-Qaeda, etc.). The enemy will always remain the enemy.
  20. vladimirw 29 September 2015 09: 13 New
    • -1
    • 0
    -1
    So why discuss, pind .. war and turmoil are most beneficial, and they want to draw the Russian Federation to the fullest
  21. da Vinci 29 September 2015 09: 35 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    "The coalition includes more than 60 states." Hmm ... So why is ISIS not destroyed, but actively amplified? Options: or in a coalition, there are far from 60 states; or these 60 states are helpless; or a coalition of these 60 states does not fight ISIS, but actively supports it. wink
  22. da Vinci 29 September 2015 09: 42 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    But if Russia submitted its draft to the UN Security Council, and the United States vetoed, then Russia could have declared that the United States would block a political solution to the problem. Let me remind you of the excellent provocation: recently, the United States and their faithful mongers put forward a draft resolution, which was still unacceptable for Russia during the discussion, and therefore should not have been put to a vote, but, as a result, Russia was put forward for its veto, in the most unflattering light, they raised the question of restricting Russia to the right to block decisions of the UN Security Council. The answer should be mirrored. drinks
  23. afrikanez 29 September 2015 09: 42 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    according to Washington, includes more than 60 states.
    It is also interesting what kind of states are those that are so eagerly fighting and IS. Already as many as 60 pieces from somewhere counted. Is Antarctica probably also on this list? fool
  24. Alexey Boukin 29 September 2015 09: 48 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Quote: MIKHAN
    Europe is silent ..?

    And what can Europe say? She is deprived of the right to vote, she can only yelp occasionally toward Russia to be affectionately patted on the scruff of the neck.
  25. Zolotse 29 September 2015 10: 01 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: Masya Masya
    They blocked it because the project was proposed by Russia, wretched ...

    But, the position of Russia was loudly marked, and the Americans blocked. Now, to many, the most dull in the world will reach who is who. Very clear situation. This is a good reserve for the future ...
  26. loaln 29 September 2015 10: 57 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    You need to understand the main thing. The United States does not need to be pulled into a coalition; there is no need to rely on them. All the same, they will spoil everything and call Russia guilty.
    They only need to be warned to stay away from the contact line of government troops and their opponents. In order not to fall under the distribution.
    And, in general, we must forget about the United States. THIS country is a parasite. Whoever wants to, let him trade with her, but to make media out of a television box and the media to advertise this education alien to humanity is incredible stupidity. Let the "quiet" diplomats do this. In your circles.
  27. gladysheff2010 29 September 2015 13: 34 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Obama got excited, out of 193 UN members only 60 supported the position of Fashington, the rest were not at all enthusiastic about Amer’s ravings!
  28. sannik 29 September 2015 14: 54 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    the other was not to be expected. unless they will fight against what they themselves have created. in general there are no words, some letters in a bad combination.