Deadly threat to "Cobra" and "Mirage" - Russian modernized "Shilka-M4"

152
Foreign armies still use hundreds of ZSU-23-4, which are still an excellent low-cost option for any country. Therefore, the task of upgrading the machine veteran is still relevant. According to military experts, the best option would be the Russian ZSU-23-4М4 "Shilka-М4", recently demonstrated at an exhibition in Nizhny Tagil, reports "Messenger of Mordovia".

Deadly threat to "Cobra" and "Mirage" - Russian modernized "Shilka-M4"


According to the creators of the machine, the main purpose of the ZSU-23-4М4 "Shilka-М4" is air defense of ground forces units in all types of combat operations, as well as for air defense of objects.

ZSU can fight with low-flying aircraft, including hovering, cruise missiles, unmanned aerial vehicles, lightly armored ground and surface targets, as well as targets that are dropped on parachutes under conditions of interference and various climatic conditions.

It is possible to integrate into a single military information structure of air defense. The machine is equipped with: 23-mm quad small caliber installation, two universal starter modules. Ammunition - 2000 23-mm shots, as well as 4 missiles to the Strelets complex.

In a single air defense system, an air target can be detected up to 34 km. The maximum target tracking when using a radio channel reaches - 10 km, the minimum - 200 meters.

The machine has the ability to shoot down air targets that fly at a speed of 500 MS, the minimum height of the target tracking is 20 meters. The consumption of shells - 300-600 shots, the probability of hitting the target in one span at the expense of shells to 300 pieces - 0.5.

The range of damage in range is 2500 meters, in height 1500 meters, rocket armament in range 5000 meters, and height 3500 meters. Crew - 4 person.
152 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +36
    26 September 2015 07: 54
    Shilka is definitely a thing !!! Somewhere I heard that a tank can stop in the forehead. Of course, it won’t take the armor, but the tank is rowing on the spot. But it’s a terrible thing against manpower in a clean field. Yes, and against aviation, it seems to me, pretty relevant. Especially in modernized versions
    1. +48
      26 September 2015 08: 14
      We were surprised by the rockets on the Shilka. Such modernization has been asking for a long time. Not the richest countries will like it, and our storage facilities can be slowly upgraded.
      1. +4
        26 September 2015 13: 36
        Shylka on a needle - yes. But as air defense - sorry. 300 rounds of ammunition with a probability of 0.5, say 600 rounds - 100%, ammunition 2000, we get 3 downed targets, And if you put missiles there, you get a shell. He is already riveting with might and main.
        1. +3
          26 September 2015 16: 37
          This should not be allowed. Will the gun always have time to release 600 shells in one flight? Will there be a second flight at all?

          In any case, the probabilities cannot be added this way, and 100% defeat will never happen. Therefore, to hit even 3 targets with a high probability will not work.
          1. 0
            26 September 2015 21: 45
            Quote: vadsonen
            In any case, the probabilities cannot be added this way, and 100% defeat will never happen. Therefore, to hit even 3 targets with a high probability will not work

            and if 2 shilka will work for the same purpose? so it is possible?
            1. +5
              27 September 2015 08: 04
              If I remember school math correctly, the probability of defeat will be 1-0,5x0,5 = 0,75 - of course, you can ...
          2. 0
            28 September 2015 09: 29
            Quote: vadsonen
            Will the gun always have time to release 600 shells in one flight? Will there be a second flight at all?

            This is a system of front-line air cover, the fight against attack aircraft and helicopters ....
          3. +1
            28 September 2015 12: 08
            ... Will the gun always have time to release 600 shells in one flight? ...

            ... Will have time ..... There rate of fire - mom, don't worry !!!! ..... I don't remember exactly, but the rate of fire is about 3500 per minute ... And this is about 10 seconds ... In general, this thing hits with packets of shots .... Even if a 2 sec packet is a "swarm" of 120-140 shells .... Taking into account automatic guidance .... Tin !!!!
            1. +2
              28 September 2015 15: 24
              On the Tu-95 in 1971, when I served as an air gunner, the radio operator YES stood just 3X2 AM-23 guns .... Diameter 23 mm, and rate of fire 23 shots per second from one twin gun ... 1380 rounds per minute .. . armor-piercing shells, conventional, incendiary ... So much time has passed, and this model of the 23 mm gun is constantly being improved! When we shot at ground targets during the exercises, a black spot remained from the targets ... Still, God did not deprive us of the bright brains of our designers and scientists!
      2. 0
        27 September 2015 13: 25
        Moreover, under Soviet rule, they delivered missiles and called them "Tunguska"
        1. 0
          28 September 2015 09: 36
          Quote: dkflbvbh
          Moreover, under Soviet rule, they delivered missiles and called them "Tunguska"

          It’s all wrong, Comrade Lieutenant Colonel!
          Shilka: 4 × 23-mm
          Tunguska: 2 x 30 mm
    2. +16
      26 September 2015 08: 23
      Quote: Hubun
      Shilka is definitely a thing !!!

      If memory serves, then in Afghanistan the spirits called it Shaitan Arba, only in Afghanistan a radar station was removed from it, so as not to give out its presence in escort columns.
      1. +45
        26 September 2015 08: 55
        Quote: Sirocco
        If memory serves, then in Afghanistan the spirits called it Shaitan Arba, only in Afghanistan the radar station was removed from it, so as not to give out its presence in the convoy columns.


        The radar station, and everything that was connected with the guidance over the radio channel, was not dismantled for this. And as unnecessary ...
        The "spirits" did not have aviation.

        And in addition, the dismantling of equipment, allowed to increase the volume for ammunition, improving its characteristics.
        1. 0
          27 September 2015 07: 48
          Yes, that's right
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. +5
        26 September 2015 13: 21
        Quote: Sirocco
        If memory serves, then in Afghanistan the spirits called it Shaitan Arba, only in Afghanistan the radar station was removed from it, so as not to give out its presence in the convoy columns.

        Shilka and BMP-2 were also called "Shaitan Arboy". For this, sometimes the bannik was stuck into the BMP-1 cannon, so that from a distance there was a resemblance to the "2". But about the rent of the radar, so as not to give out the location - amused. Even Hollywood did not enter into a head to put a mujahid in his turban at the remote control of a radar reconnaissance station. Move the idea there - you see, you will chop the cabbage. They love science fiction.
        1. +1
          28 September 2015 05: 58
          I mean something else :) namely, to increase the survival of the machine on the battlefield by reducing its visual identification, so that it (shilka) does not become a priority target for the first grenade hi
      4. 0
        27 September 2015 07: 47
        absolutely right
    3. +27
      26 September 2015 08: 30
      this is a beautiful legend, Newton’s laws, no one canceled, if the tank had stopped, then the silk itself would have flown away in the opposite direction when shots;))
      and so, Shilka is a thing! Modernization has long been obvious with the change of Breo, the installation of missile weapons.
      In truth, a universal machine, you need to support the infantry, please, you need to cover from the air, please, too!
      1. +8
        26 September 2015 08: 41
        Quote: NOMADE
        this is a beautiful legend, Newton’s laws, no one has canceled

        At the expense of Shilka, I don’t know, maybe this is a legend, but about the AK-630, I saw the transmission on TV, according to the designer, demolishes all the attachments from the tank (as I can expect the storage cabinet) and incapacitates everything equipment inside the tank that may fall off the mount.
        1. +11
          26 September 2015 08: 56
          so I didn’t say anything about damage, I mean that it stops. It is clear that with such a rate of fire, the entire outer body kit will be demolished. about 30 mm, there was even more, there was information that, when a leopard (which type I don’t remember) is successfully hit (with a small dispersion of shells)), cracks appear.
          when working ak 630, the moment of return, as far as I remember -20 tons!
          1. +9
            26 September 2015 11: 15
            In my opinion, not a moment of bestowal, but an impulse. The moment is still a force on the shoulder.
            1. +1
              27 September 2015 02: 54
              yes, you are right - an impulse, not a moment of bestowal
          2. +2
            28 September 2015 00: 01
            It won’t break through the armor of the tank, but what kind of crash will it be inside the tank? Stunning the entire crew and the problem of washing their pants. This is not before maneuvers and battles laughing
        2. +10
          26 September 2015 09: 04
          Actually, the AK-630 is a ship system, how will it shoot at tanks?
          1. +1
            26 September 2015 09: 08
            I know perfectly well that ship option. I mentioned it, as an example on the return))) and 30 mm and its power is about a weapon on a BMP (I do not remember the model)
            1. 0
              26 September 2015 09: 19
              There was an article about firing BMP-3
            2. 0
              26 September 2015 09: 19
              There was an article about firing BMP-3
              1. The comment was deleted.
              2. gjv
                +10
                26 September 2015 13: 57
                Quote: Zaurbek
                There was an article about firing BMP-3

                I did not find an article about shooting. There is an article about the modernization of weapons BMP-3.
                KBP weapons for wars of new type
                http://topwar.ru/25290-oruzhie-kbp-dlya-voyn-novogo-tipa.html
                Here’s a video about shooting
              3. The comment was deleted.
              4. gjv
                +6
                26 September 2015 14: 02
                Quote: Zaurbek
                There was an article about firing BMP-3

                Another such presentation of the BMP-3M weapon system
          2. +4
            26 September 2015 10: 59
            Quote: Andrey NM
            Actually, the AK-630 is a ship system, how will it shoot at tanks?

            The Chinese have already blinded.
            1. +3
              26 September 2015 12: 25
              Quote: WUA 518
              but about the AK-630, I saw the transmission on TV, according to the designer, demolishes all attachments from the tank (as I guess the storage cabinet can also) and destroys all the equipment inside the tank that can break from the mount

              Maybe I read something wrong?
              The Chinese hid the ammunition in the turret, while the AK-630 had all this under the turret. How "Shilka" shoots, I did not see, but how AK-630 I had to, I liked it. Only on the ears is very pressing :).
        3. +1
          26 September 2015 09: 26
          Caterpillars can smash into the trash
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. +1
            26 September 2015 10: 40
            Quote: bubla5
            Caterpillars can smash into the trash

            With a successful combination of circumstances, when shooting in a side view, it will "shave off" the whole "hodovka" ...
            And the crew, after being hit by a squall of 23mm "cucumbers" in the turret and hull, is not to be envied. I guess at least a shell shock ...
        4. 0
          28 September 2015 13: 59
          The AK-630 is a ship’s armament. Where did you see the tanks in the sea?! They didn’t do it against the tanks. And the consumption of b / c on it is soooooo! On the ships of the cellar, God forbid!
          They shot at the tank at the firing range. Well, the body kit was demolished. So what? And what will happen to the AK-630 or ZSU if the tank gets into the response?
      2. +12
        26 September 2015 08: 45
        gee-gee. And if, for example, a bullet from an AKP Colt 11.43 rolls a person when hit in the chest, is that a shooter flies off for a couple of meters? laughing Something, it seems to me, you and Comrade Newton did not work out.
        1. +1
          26 September 2015 09: 14
          The legend is that the checkpoint tank was covered .. Bullshit of course! But against the subsonic cruise missiles the thing is deadly. The radar is of course old, but the flow of shells .... like from a brigade ...
          Quote: Yarik
          gee-gee. And if, for example, a bullet from an AKP Colt 11.43 rolls a person when hit in the chest, is that a shooter flies off for a couple of meters? laughing Something, it seems to me, you and Comrade Newton did not work out.
        2. 0
          26 September 2015 12: 42
          Well, it depends on how thick the shooter and target are. if a terribly thin person shoots a fat man, the situation will change.
      3. +6
        26 September 2015 09: 00
        this is a beautiful legend, Newton’s laws, no one canceled, if the tank had stopped, then the silk itself would have flown away in the opposite direction when shots;))


        So the tank does not push the shilka, but the released charges, which have their own speed. And so in your opinion it turns out that the person who shot the pistol at the bulletproof vest should also fly off at the same distance as the person in the bulletproof vest into which the bullet hit.
      4. +4
        26 September 2015 09: 03
        Quote: NOMADE
        this is a beautiful legend, Newton’s laws, no one canceled, if the tank had stopped, then the silk itself would have flown away in the opposite direction when shots;))

        It looks like your Newton lived far from school ??
        The force of expanding gases during the combustion of gunpowder accelerates a bullet in the bore and gives it kinetic energy.
        How is the energy of the weapon related to the purpose in which it falls?
        This is not a spear rider for you, where spears are filed at a performancelaughing
        1. +2
          26 September 2015 11: 22
          To the picture.
          In the picture, the knights converge incorrectly, in the right-hand position, which does not give the proper effect for defeat. From here, the world initially had left-hand traffic, i.e. with weapons closer to a potential enemy
          1. +3
            26 September 2015 11: 44
            but for me it’s so right! They converge as you indicated, then the right side is not exposed!
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. +1
          27 September 2015 03: 09
          Newton is not mine, but the great scholarly heritage of mankind. On his laws of conservation of energy, all modern physics (except quantum ...) is built, and as a result, all industry, mechanics and mechanisms.

          you yourself correctly answered that the bullet accelerates in the barrel and the maximum speed (and as a consequence the energy E = m * s2) at the cut of the barrel, and so at this moment there is a reaction, in this case, recoil.
          Further, in flight, the speed and, as a result, the energy of the bullet / projectile falls (and is not taken from nowhere)))

          And to all the minusers, I recommend re-studying the school program in physics (like there used to be a 5-7 grade program)), it’s not holy to believe Hollywood films that when a bullet hits, a person is thrown back by 2 meters))))
          1. +3
            28 September 2015 00: 19
            Quote: NOMADE
            Newton is not mine, but the great scholarly heritage of mankind. On his laws of conservation of energy, all modern physics (except quantum ...) is built, and as a result, all industry, mechanics and mechanisms.

            you yourself correctly answered that the bullet accelerates in the barrel and the maximum speed (and as a consequence the energy E = m * s2) at the cut of the barrel, and so at this moment there is a reaction, in this case, recoil.
            Further, in flight, the speed and, as a result, the energy of the bullet / projectile falls (and is not taken from nowhere)))

            And to all the minusers, I recommend re-studying the school program in physics (like there used to be a 5-7 grade program)), it’s not holy to believe Hollywood films that when a bullet hits, a person is thrown back by 2 meters))))


            Nothing personal, but before sending others for textbooks, it would not be bad to repeat the basics yourself;)
            Firstly, E = mc ^ 2 is a formula of the total energy of a physical object released during its annihilation. For less pathos physics, the kinetic energy formula is used, E = 0,5mv ^ 2.
            Secondly, first the recoil acts on the breech / breech, and only then on the cut of the barrel, and it acts on the breech / breech to a much greater extent than on the cut of the barrel.
      5. +10
        26 September 2015 09: 18
        Quote: NOMADE
        this is a beautiful legend, Newton’s laws, no one canceled if the tank stopped


        Figuratively speaking, the "tank stopped" - this is not a legend, but reality. Shilka's fire density is the highest, and if MBT hits this stream of 23-mm shells, his armor, of course, will remain intact, but the attachments (headlights, sights, external machine gun) will simply blow off, all periscopic devices will be broken, and after that the tank will not go anywhere, let alone the ability to fight. So, stopping the tank with Shilkoy is a very real task. The main thing is not to let the tank fire first.
        1. 0
          28 September 2015 08: 34
          As there is such a beast "Terminator" is a vehicle for escorting tanks. Just for this, it was made. Only he has a spark
        2. The comment was deleted.
      6. The comment was deleted.
      7. +1
        26 September 2015 09: 43
        Moreover - how many foreign operators!
        They have a new radar, OEPS, yes + 4 "Pines", even "Needles" for a proven car. And not that expensive.
      8. +1
        26 September 2015 10: 27
        Quote: NOMADE
        this is a beautiful legend, Newton’s laws, no one canceled, if the tank had stopped, then the silk itself would have flown away in the opposite direction when shots;))

        Legend, not legend, but what will happen to the tank after Shilka’s solid salvo? Will any of the attachments survive, and will the tank be able to continue fighting after that? I’m not saying that Shilka should be released against tanks, but it seems to me that she has a chance to stop the tank.
      9. -1
        26 September 2015 12: 39
        At a minimum, it has a very impressive appearance and is able to demoralize the enemy without even shooting at all.
      10. -1
        26 September 2015 14: 00
        I don’t know the tank, it will stop no, but the bald armor remained !!!
      11. -3
        27 September 2015 10: 27
        Quote: NOMADE
        If the tank stopped, then the silk itself would fly off in the opposite direction when shots;))

        An 76 mm T-34 cannon gives a return in 76 tons when fired, which is twice the weight of the tank, so that the tank does not fly away from the shot, there is a hydraulic barrel rollback system, but the energy of impact on the armor of the 76 mm projectile exceeds the daily output of the entire Dnieper . So the power of a projectile strike, if it does not ricochet, exceeds the recoil force many times over.
        1. +2
          27 September 2015 12: 44
          yes, you are right, but this energy is obtained when the projectile comes in contact with another object. compare the area of ​​the frontal projection of the projectile and the area of ​​uniform acceleration of the projectile in the gun’s barrel, then the return goes to the tower, carriage, hull, chassis, ground. a shot is a short-term and controlled impulse. hit of a projectile with its small projection, pointed frontal part, this is an avalanche-like destruction, for understanding, there is such a term as the fluidity of steel, for example 60 kgf / mm. So compare the area of ​​the tip of the projectile (several mm) with the acceleration area in the barrel. energy is not taken from nowhere, after departure and the trunk, the speed only drops, as a result, and energy.
        2. +2
          27 September 2015 22: 25
          So the power of a projectile strike, if it does not ricochet, exceeds the recoil force many times over.
          Take a physics textbook for the 6th grade (now it may be for another ...) and read the paragraphs with the tasks of maintaining momentum - this is somewhere at the very beginning. In classical students, there was always a task for a bullet fired from a gun, bullet speed and recoil ....
        3. 0
          28 September 2015 23: 42
          Do not drive, smoke materiel
      12. 0
        27 September 2015 16: 26
        Modernization has long been asking for a change of breo,

        Tunguska - this is the modernization of the legendary Shilka.
        1. 0
          27 September 2015 17: 38
          This is Shilka's Daughter
          1. 0
            28 September 2015 09: 51
            Quote: igor.borov775
            This is Shilka's Daughter

            Judging by your statement, Shilka is Tunguskin’s mother. And who is dad then?

            And, by the way, if you take kinship, then Tunguska is rather the eldest (in the sense of power) sister of Shilka. And most likely even a cousin.
    4. +1
      26 September 2015 10: 55
      Quote: Hubun
      against manpower in the open field is a terrible thing however.

      Not necessarily in the field - in mountainous terrain it perfectly smokes "spirits" from shelters. When escorting columns, the car is irreplaceable!
    5. -3
      26 September 2015 15: 29
      I have one acquaintance, a former officer-flyman once said that if the shilka hits the tank forehead, then the tank seems to be intact, then the stuffing from the crew turns out ... is there anything connected with resonance?
      1. +1
        27 September 2015 03: 18
        this is a legend, but little pleasant, but "minced meat" will not be. this term was true for the high-explosive 122 and 152 mm during the 2nd world war and that because the tanks were not pressurized (there was no protection against weapons of mass destruction). Now it is almost irrelevant, since the tanks are sealed and have excess pressure inside the crew compartment, as a result, are less sensitive to the action of a shock wave when a land mine is detonated.
        1. 0
          27 September 2015 12: 29
          minusator, get out of the dusk and justify what you disagree with.
          invisible shooter mlyn))
    6. 0
      27 September 2015 17: 25
      Hello!! Yes, the old woman can still wrestle, but better of course Tunguska. Ea will not give her to anyone. Crumbles like a sewing machine. For some reason, it is constantly in the shade. And the system is strong.
    7. 0
      28 September 2015 09: 23
      Quote: Hubun
      Shilka - a thing definitely !!

      and especially for poor states with a rugged topography .... works very well on ground targets (especially in the mountains)
      1. 0
        28 September 2015 10: 24
        Shaitan Arba Shuravi however!
    8. AAV
      0
      28 September 2015 10: 29
      With a volley of Shilka on the tank, you can take down all of its attachments, including surveillance systems, after which it will most likely stop ...
  2. +1
    26 September 2015 07: 54
    Veterans do not go to peace and continue to be in service.
  3. -13
    26 September 2015 07: 54
    except for missiles, and so for Cobras, and even more so for Mirages, they’ll carve it out like a tortoise god
    1. +13
      26 September 2015 08: 23
      Quote: rosarioagro
      except for missiles, and so for Cobras, and even more so for Mirages, they’ll carve it out like a tortoise god

      How to say...

      In a deeply echeloned air defense system, "Shilka" will be its extreme link, on which the remnants of the enemy aircraft that have broken through will have to break.

      She has a place in the army, her own niche ...
  4. 0
    26 September 2015 08: 00
    I would have a sword, but a horse
    Yes to the line of fire!
    Only hardly shaw from mani
    -It was posled after ...
    I saw the device in the 1986-mmm case. At night on Katyusha shells,
    in Berdyansk. Strongly. Like a salute.
  5. 0
    26 September 2015 08: 01
    A good thing. It would be more useful for them to establish Russia on the borders of the Baltic states, Ukraine, and NATO countries so that not a single trough flies.
    1. +3
      26 September 2015 09: 17
      I want to ask a question to uriapatriotu-why shilka Russia? she is outdated, has insufficient range. there are more powerful and new tungusks in the army, now shells are coming. WHAT FOR? for the sake of an Internet rating? follow the next step in pursuit of virtual shoulder straps you wish the Russian army more flintlocks or immediately to sling-spear-arrows wassat
      1. +3
        26 September 2015 10: 39
        If you feel like it, then you will go to war with a flintlock gun. Or just hands up the hill?
        "Shilka" is an excellent thing, and will serve more ...
        1. -5
          26 September 2015 12: 47
          A "silicon" gun is powerful. And Shilka can already be replaced with 30-mm Tunguska, more than. So the leavened cheers-patriotism does not channel.
          1. 0
            26 September 2015 18: 49
            Quote: razgildyay
            replace the 30 mm tung

            I remember it is no longer produced.
            1. 0
              27 September 2015 11: 34
              Produce, unlike this Shilka. Still, ZSU would start producing machines with quad Maxims. In general, everyone would have won.
      2. +2
        26 September 2015 11: 06
        Quote: Andy
        the army has more powerful and new tungusks, now shells are coming. WHAT FOR?

        But why do we need weapons at all? .. And why in Russia, on railway siding, are still thousands of canned steam locomotives?
        You do not recall, by the way, how many MINUTES, according to statistics, a tank lives in modern combat?
        And how much industry can BBM produce in case of active hostilities? ..
        "Shilka", moreover modernized, can provide serious support in the transition period of the war. And considering how the punished western warriors dream of clashing with us, the likelihood of such a development of events remains.
        1. +2
          27 September 2015 10: 42
          Quote: avia1991
          You do not recall, by the way, how many MINUTES, according to statistics, a tank lives in modern combat?

          by the way, a photograph against the background of the Reichstag stands T-34-76 with the L-11 gun, which they stopped putting on the T-34 from 41 of the year. How long did this T-34 live in the war?
          1. 0
            27 September 2015 16: 40
            Quote: shasherin.pavel
            How long did this T-34 live in the war?

            If you trace the history of this tank, it can easily turn out that it was removed from the southern borders of the USSR in the 45th spring!
            I do not presume to say for sure that not a single T-34 remained by the 45th year, which went through the whole war "from and to". Perhaps there are such machines. But do not compare that time with today: when using modern weapons in a real battle (not in a local conflict, this is a separate topic), in 1985 the tank had to survive for 7 minutes. If such a mess happened, the tank commander, who had kept the vehicle in good order, was promised without looking at the Hero of the Soviet Union ..
            Since then, weapons have improved significantly, but "on both sides." I believe the virtual statistics parameters have remained at about the same level.
      3. 0
        26 September 2015 18: 51
        Quote: Andy
        she is out of date

        with the same success, we can say about the T-72 that it is outdated, we don’t need to upgrade it and we don’t need it in general. BUT! Need and still serve.
  6. 0
    26 September 2015 08: 02
    Interesting information. So many years in service with so many countries. And where do they get the trunks?
    1. 0
      26 September 2015 09: 20
      and what they’ll do is gather dust somewhere in the hangars of a car. Well they don’t shoot, the barrel doesn’t wear out.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  7. +5
    26 September 2015 08: 07
    During the NATO air raid on Libya in 1986, the first Amerikosov plane was shot down precisely by Shilka. And many Shilki were not involved because of the cowardice of the locals, although for them it was an ideal field of activity. After all, most of the anti-aircraft missile divisions were simply disabled due to illiteracy and sloppiness of the local. Only those missions survived that the Libyans did not manage to arrive on time on alarm, or did not turn on the CHR transmitters.
  8. +3
    26 September 2015 08: 19
    The developments of the Russian gunsmiths are elegant and concise, well done! Yes
    And when you look at the "newest" developments of dill, you wonder: - after all, there Were talented people ... maybe they have been in Russia for a long time? If so, then it is understandable why such "masterpieces" come out from under the dill, which cause a smile and bewilderment: - Was ist das ??? laughing
    1. +4
      26 September 2015 21: 49
      ZSU-23-4 cannot be the development of Russian gunsmiths.
      I don’t want to offend you, but why is this? The topic is purely about technology, and you again climb with your "dill". Not tired yet? Or do you miss him in the kitchen?
  9. +4
    26 September 2015 08: 21
    An acquaintance told me how "Shilka" worked for the militants who had settled in buildings (Grozny). Very powerful and effective!
    1. +6
      26 September 2015 08: 28
      Quote: Bayonet
      An acquaintance told me how "Shilka" worked for the militants who had settled in buildings (Grozny). Very powerful and effective!

      In Chechnya, and in Afghanistan, "Shilka", the truth is very limited (in Afghanistan more often), was used as a kind of "light BMPT".

      Moreover, in the DRA, our units "modernized" the ZSU, dismantling the air defense guidance systems that were not needed in those conditions, and thereby, freeing up space for additional ammunition.
      1. -1
        26 September 2015 14: 59
        I have already quoted here the words of our early. headquarters. He is an "Afghan", he said that an instant fuse was placed on the projectile, and then everything was carried into the trash where the line fell. The "spirits" sometimes preferred to sit quietly rather than attack the columns when they noticed the "shilka" accompanied by ..
        1. +1
          26 September 2015 18: 52
          Quote: serega73
          sit quietly, and not attack the columns when they noticed the "shilka" accompanied.

          or she was number one goal.
    2. +4
      26 September 2015 10: 08
      Quote: Bayonet
      "Shilka" worked on the militants entrenched in buildings

      View reports from Syria last year, there are such shots.
  10. +9
    26 September 2015 08: 23
    And on ground targets how it works - ATAS, an unforgettable sight ...
    I would call this unit "Saw".
    Elevation angles allow the robust processing of targets in mountainous terrain.
    To the south of Panj, the bearded refused to attack our columns, if this apparatus was nearby.
    1. 0
      27 September 2015 22: 21
      Quote: Oman 47
      I would call this unit "Saw".

      CRASHER hi
  11. +11
    26 September 2015 08: 30
    Well, practice is the criterion of truth. The fact that this device is still in demand and relevant in today's theater of war is evidence of the genius of the Soviet school of military equipment design. It is especially pleasant, despite its venerable age, the possibility of modernization is inherent in it. A deep bow to our Soviet engineers
    1. +5
      26 September 2015 09: 15
      Vasily Gryazev Arkady Shipunov is simply a genius. Arms with the brand GSH standard of reliability and efficiency
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. +1
        26 September 2015 10: 51
        Quote: Evil elf
        Vasily Gryazev Arkady Shipunov is simply a genius.

        Alas, the departed ...

        Know more that their business is in good hands, that there are worthy successors ...
      3. 0
        26 September 2015 21: 14
        Gryazev and Shipunov have nothing to do with "Shilka", their genius is in "Tunguska" and "Pantsir". hi
        1. 0
          27 September 2015 18: 01
          And in the AK Navy Cannons, everything is from there and also aviation ones. By the way, to the AK-630 their hand is also visible. They really did a lot.
  12. +10
    26 September 2015 08: 31
    A cool machine. We thoroughly studied it during our cadet years. Modification is successful! Minimum costs, and the effect has multiplied. The enemies do not understand how RUSSIA "spends little" money on rearmament. The answer is simple. All equipment had a practical reserve of potential. Example. MI-8MT practical ceiling 4500m. (According to the instructions of the crew), and entered at 7000m. There, across the river ... It was so necessary to SURVIVE.
  13. +1
    26 September 2015 08: 34
    they would have to propel and upgrade the towed option (well, there are all sorts of command-and-control systems, review, aiming systems) and offer an option on a car chassis ... I’m afraid that the armored base will have a small market.
    1. +2
      26 September 2015 09: 17
      Something I do not agree with you. RPG-7 is still in demand today and I think it is forever. A simple but extremely effective weapon
  14. +1
    26 September 2015 08: 50
    And if you try without "hurray-patriotism"? Unfortunately, the effectiveness of the "Shilka" in modern combat against aircraft is not sufficient precisely because of the critical parameter - the insufficient caliber of its guns, and, consequently, their small reach and low accuracy. Those who are in the subject know that its competitor in the Yenisei project had a caliber of 37 mm and, accordingly, all indicators are much higher, but did not go into the series for two reasons: as then the rate of fire (a unit of metal per second) was considered more relevant and. .. "Shilka" had more lobbyists in the upper echelons of power. "Yenisei" was safely "lost", but in vain, oh, how in vain. Now the modernization of the Shilka has run into insufficient range and large dispersion in the last third of this range. An attempt to correct this drawback by four "archers" looks frivolous ... to me, I'm wondering how the creators solved the problem of "flashing" of the "archer" homing heads from hot barrels and the self-propelled gun itself? and also from shaking the platform of missiles when firing?
    1. +4
      26 September 2015 09: 20
      And if you try without "hurray-patriotism"?

      And if you try without hurray-pessimism and unfounded irony? "Shilka" can work perfectly on helicopters and UAVs, accompany the columns on the march. And for more serious aviation, there are other air defense systems. In addition, as it was written above correctly, it can be an excellent means of infantry fire support. This property was repeatedly observed in Soviet times during live firing, when one ZSU-23-4 was attached to reinforce the MSR in defense. The sight is memorable.
      1. +1
        26 September 2015 09: 39
        Firstly, before writing about "working with UAVs" you need to have a little idea: what modern UAVs are, their types, how they are used, at what range, about their visibility for different detection means, etc.
        Secondly, where did you see the "unfounded irony"? I asked very specific questions to which I would like to receive specific answers.
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. +2
          26 September 2015 13: 32
          Quote: Monster_Fat
          Firstly, before writing about "working with UAVs" you need to have a little idea: what modern UAVs are, their types, how they are used, at what range, about their visibility for different detection means, etc.


          Somewhere, I met a video, like in the night sky, either the militias are trying to shoot a dill drone from the 23-2 memory, or the dill, on the contrary ...

          "Tracks", passed by ... And the disembodied, then light up the "light", then extinguish, and as if mockingly "hangs" ...

          Not the same, ZUShka has a fire density and not the same sights.

          But if you use "Shilka", "lupanula", with your 23x4 Yes ...
        3. 0
          28 September 2015 09: 02
          A video about Shilka’s accuracy can be viewed here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nBzRKKEeIfo I would say far from Wow
    2. 0
      26 September 2015 17: 00
      but why bother to upgrade the shilka if there is a tunguska and shell?
    3. +1
      26 September 2015 23: 34
      Davydov wrote that they tried to restore the Yeniseev’s production, but it was already too late
    4. +1
      27 September 2015 23: 27
      "Illumination" from the radiation of heated barrels is excluded, the optical coordinator has a very narrow directional diagram. The contrast of radiation from the air target, background, and heated air is quite high. The sensitivity, selectivity and directional pattern of the head make it possible to provide shooting from a position, for example, on bare ground, on sand, and the like. Sand and rocky desert at noon at 10 degrees N. in the daytime, they light up so that you don't need devices to feel it. The complex shoots, it hits no worse than in the European part.

      The vibrations are damped by the shock-absorbing suspension of the platform before firing and the inclusion of a tight connection before firing.
    5. 0
      28 September 2015 17: 15
      Quote: Monster_Fat
      insufficient caliber of its guns, and therefore a small reach and low accuracy.

      Right. Now let's add something else to the equation. We will distract the robots from their dreams of robotic war and force them to make a modern target tracking and aiming unit. And now the accuracy has radically increased, which means that the reach has also increased. After all, what is the problem then? Is it that the projectile does not penetrate the air target? No, not that. Only that he does not fall into it.
      Well, then a multi-site high-resolution video camera, a phased array radar and a computer system will make shooting with feedback really possible. That is, we shoot out fifty shells, correct them and ...
      Kirdyk to enemy helicopters as soon as they enter the combat course. Forget about drone drone. No "counter-guerrilla" aircraft attacking our positions with high precision. And snipers, light caponiers, even autonomous warheads will have to be very hot!
      This will be a really terrible war ...
  15. 0
    26 September 2015 09: 01
    Nice machine !!!! If it is applied, as the designers intended, it does its job well, of course it is useless and outdated, when compared with the S-400))))) In modern conflicts, it will find its niche, at least against drones, because it is expensive to bring them down with missiles will, and in terms of manpower, these installations are applied "with a bang."
    1. +1
      26 September 2015 22: 03
      And when compared with a slingshot, it will be S-400. laughing
    2. 0
      27 September 2015 02: 46
      Would you still compare AKM with PL Pr.971 "Pike" wink
  16. 0
    26 September 2015 09: 16
    Weak for modernization, but if the shells with remote detonation - yes, modernization. Or replacing the guns with today's relevant 57mm.
    1. +2
      26 September 2015 12: 27
      Quote: Marssik
      Now if the shells with remote detonation

      Such shells, the thing is not cheap. It is terrible to imagine how many kilo rubles per second will fly out at its rate of fire! what
      1. 0
        26 September 2015 20: 17
        Quote: Bayonet
        Such shells, the thing is not cheap. It is terrible to imagine how many kilo rubles per second will fly out at its rate of fire!

        Is it possible that 2-4 of these shells that hit the target are more expensive than 200-300 conventional ones? Eh, the market, the market, or something earlier — no matter how much it costs, then we must do it.
    2. +1
      27 September 2015 02: 49
      Quote: Marssik
      Weak for modernization, but if the shells with remote detonation - yes, modernization. Or replacing the guns with today's relevant 57mm.

      It will not turn out to be an upgrade, it will turn out to be a completely new system.
  17. 0
    26 September 2015 09: 22
    In Chechnya, Shilka shot down a Su-25. During the first war.
  18. +2
    26 September 2015 09: 37
    If they organize ambushes on them in dangerous directions, then the helicopter will have a khan. Yes, and large drones, too.
    1. +7
      26 September 2015 09: 53
      Firstly, "big drones" are used at altitudes of 6-12 km, where "Shilka" is not "Irok" at all. Secondly: as soon as "Shilka" opens fire on a small drone from an "ambush", it will be immediately spotted by the "big drone" and will catch the "Helfire" or something like that. Unfortunately, many here on the forum have no idea about the state and development of the modern "battlefield" and think in terms of "Chechnya" and "Afghan".
      1. -4
        26 September 2015 12: 32
        Quote: Monster_Fat
        think in terms of "Chechnya" and "Afghan".

        Even more, in categories of the Civil War - Checkers bald and urya! smile
        1. 0
          27 September 2015 13: 39
          Quote: Bayonet
          Checkers bald and Urya!

          Thank you for your appreciation - made sure that he is right! hi
  19. +2
    26 September 2015 09: 49
    The upgrade of the ZSU 23-4M4 product is a correct "Solomon solution", since the performance characteristics of this sample fully meet the modern tasks of the air defense forces. And it should be borne in mind that Shilka has been supplied to many countries, you can make good money on this, the main thing is to offer the goods correctly. soldier
    1. +1
      26 September 2015 12: 36
      Quote: Appraiser
      The performance characteristics of this model are fully consistent with the modern tasks of air defense.

      It is possible, but nevertheless this machine deserved the majority of laudations precisely when working on ground targets.
      1. 0
        27 September 2015 11: 12
        Quote: Bayonet
        It is possible, but nevertheless this machine deserved the majority of laudations precisely when working on ground targets.

        Come on, minus on - the warriors are sofa! Shilka live and not seen laughing
    2. 0
      27 September 2015 22: 58
      It does not meet the ZSU-23-4, even the M4, to the modern tasks of air defense, since does not provide for the defeat of most air attack weapons to the point of use of weapons.
      1. 0
        29 September 2015 00: 06
        There, the SLA must first be improved. Very decent internal volumes, clogged with lamp boxes, somehow depressing very ...
        1. 0
          29 September 2015 00: 22
          There a box of mini-ITX for 2-3 kilos will replace all this junk with 600 kilos with lamps easily. It’s crucial to decide, not to hang needles with an option
          1. 0
            29 September 2015 01: 36
            Interesting idea. It is said that the installation of the destruction of air targets BEFORE the line of their weaponry does not provide. In response - you need to improve the OMS. Yes, the whole RPK-2 is a fire control system. The volumes are depressing ... well, put mini-ITX instead of the PSA, (by the way, this box needs a temperature control system that will provide 15 degrees C in the compartment with this ITX in two minutes at -40 and at +50 C in the compartment, here at Peltier do not get out), and vibration in the ranges from units of Hz to ultrasonic need to be extinguished; but the generation and processing of radio signals will remain the same. Or change the whole location, and hang the ADC-DAC, all the angular position sensors - there are dozens of them. And with the released volumes, the firing range will remain the same, which means see to the line of use of weapons It’s easier to make a new complex, deciding radically. Done - Tunguska.
  20. -1
    26 September 2015 10: 06
    It’s a pity you can’t hang armor - without it, using it on the battlefield for ground targets is very problematic.
  21. 0
    26 September 2015 10: 31
    Good machine !!! Itself does not fly and does not give to others ...
  22. +2
    26 September 2015 10: 36
    Well, that you have run into modernization is a budget modernization. If you collect all the changes proposed on the forum, then from Shilka one building will remain and this will be a completely new installation.
  23. +1
    26 September 2015 12: 26
    Here it is, in all its glory (RAE 2015).
  24. -2
    26 September 2015 12: 52
    appearing Shilka became a nightmare for NATO pilots - they themselves recognized this. By upgrading we get a machine that will still serve. Glory to the Soviet designers!
  25. +3
    26 September 2015 12: 53
    A little video from RAE-2015, a piece, "Shilka" works and then TOS-1A "Buratino". At the end "Shilka" and "Tunguska" on the observation deck. Sorry for the quality during shooting, I was shooting with my phone, with 8x digital zoom.
    1. +3
      26 September 2015 13: 20
      Oh, I lied, "Tunguska" is working at the test site.
  26. -1
    26 September 2015 13: 42
    As far as I know, "Shilka" is air defense, albeit outdated, but very effective. For ground targets, it is also excellent, but you do not need to stop there. I hope our engineers will bring it to perfection beyond the reach of others!
  27. +2
    26 September 2015 13: 45
    Something in Ukraine they are not visible. Maybe missed. Or managed to sell everything.
    And a friend who served on it told me about the combat work in Afghanistan: the duvals were blown away at a time.
    1. +2
      26 September 2015 17: 23
      That is why Urkainu was not accepted into NATO.
      Imagine a Ukrainian warrant officer in a NATO storage warehouse.
      This is Klondike!
  28. 0
    26 September 2015 14: 36
    This is a club. Simple, reliable, deadly. And it costs only a penny.
  29. +3
    26 September 2015 17: 21
    "ZSU can deal with low-flying aircraft, including hovering," hovering aircraft ...
    What did the author smoke?
    Well, there Cobra Pugacheva ....
    But so that low-flying aircraft crashed .....
    1. 0
      28 September 2015 00: 03
      Well, technically, Harrier can hang, for example ...
  30. +1
    26 September 2015 21: 25
    Shilka is undoubtedly a thing. During the Arab-Israeli war, she covered the lower echelon, where air defense systems were less effective, forcing the flyers to climb higher. But today, this is a specific thing that requires non-standard solutions. I doubt that the developers planned to use it to clear the duval or "shear" the infantry. Conversations about how the tank slips, and Shilka knocks off the whole "outfit", and amused at all. Although, in practice, the existing equipment is often used for other purposes, for example, the ZU-23, as an "anti-sniper". Or, once in my childhood I read how a Soviet pilot, having used up his ammunition, shoots from a pistol, killing the pilot of the Messerschmitt, and he, falling still hurts his bomber. laughing Bottom line, one shot - two downed enemy aircraft. It may be a fairy tale, but it struck my memory.
  31. +2
    26 September 2015 21: 41
    Quote: Hubun
    Shilka is definitely a thing !!! Somewhere I heard that a tank can stop in the forehead. Of course, it won’t take the armor, but the tank is rowing on the spot. But it’s a terrible thing against manpower in a clean field. Yes, and against aviation, it seems to me, pretty relevant. Especially in modernized versions

    The Shilka tank won't stop. But it completely demolishes all dynamic protection, attachments, surveillance devices. Unless, of course, he has time and does not receive a shell from the tank.
  32. 0
    26 September 2015 22: 48
    But we don’t do bad weapons. Russia's defense industry is the best in the world!
    1. +2
      27 September 2015 12: 36
      Quote: Old Sami
      Russia's defense industry is the best in the world!

      Why URA did not write?
  33. 0
    27 September 2015 10: 35
    Yes, Shilka, that is, as her perfume was called. Blackpox is a good car, but the disadvantage is that AK flashes it, so they removed the radar from it in Afghanistan and put sandbags inside, We went to Tambov for exercises, shot at planes but in the mirror in the interval 2-3 minutes of time between goals and if a well-trained crew, the defeat was 100%, and I won’t describe the details about the tanks, maybe cut in half, She’s such a favorite Shilka good
    1. +1
      27 September 2015 12: 38
      Quote: matwey
      maybe cut in half,

      Tank ???????? wassat
    2. 0
      27 September 2015 12: 50
      Quote: matwey
      the disadvantage is that AK flashes it

      Yah? So is it directly "stitching"? belay

      Quote: matwey
      therefore, in Afghanistan, and removed her radar

      They wrote here already: radars were removed, since the enemy had no aircraft

      Quote: matwey
      and sandbags were laid inside

      Cool laughing

      Quote: matwey
      We went to Tambov for exercises, shot

      What do you need to pull for Shilka to shoot? wink

      Quote: matwey
      I won’t describe the details of tanks, maybe cut it in half

      Mdya .. clinic .. minus
  34. +1
    27 September 2015 12: 34
    Quote: sabakina
    then fight with a silicon gun

    Kremniev? Carbonium or Lumine!
    1. +1
      27 September 2015 12: 46
      Quote: Webcelerator
      Kremniev? Carbonium or Lumine!

      Better - by the Chugunievs! laughing
      1. 0
        27 September 2015 14: 45
        Cast iron - current butt.
    2. 0
      27 September 2015 13: 12
      Quote: Webcelerator
      Quote: sabakina
      then fight with a silicon gun
      Kremniev? Carbonium or Lumine!

      Educated people .. and flint is confused with silicon .. sad

      Although, if rusty on thyristors, for example .. feel
      1. 0
        28 September 2015 12: 54
        You don’t know the attached equipment, you don’t know ...
        Ruggio - on the belt.
        And the radio is on the tank.
        And look do not confuse!
        And Shilka - as the experts described here - the tank cuts in two, this is a turn!

        Do you have a joke "From the same material"?
  35. 0
    27 September 2015 14: 43
    Quote: matwey
    , and about the tanks I won’t describe the details, maybe cut in half,

    You pushed it hard! If only the PT-76 ....
  36. +1
    27 September 2015 15: 14
    I read a book about military operations in Chechnya. The author claims that Shilka was used against snipers hiding in houses in Grozny. They beat on the foundations of houses and the houses scattered, burying all the snipers, and grenade launchers and machine gunners with them under the rubble. After all, Chechens competently used the three fighters, consisting of a sniper, machine gunner and grenade launcher. This was known by General Rokhlin. He did not allow the columns of federal troops to advance along Grozny until they cleaned everything around. So he decided the fate of Grozny. Unlike those idiots who rode without trimming to Minutka Square and the railway station and ruined the unfortunate young boys in bundles.
  37. 0
    27 September 2015 17: 54
    Shilka would be adapted to work on small and medium UAVs. A radar to take them and a fuse for shells with a gap at a distance. (Bushmeister already seems to have such) It would be the most! Cheap and efficient.
  38. 0
    27 September 2015 22: 50
    Quote: NOMADE
    Newton is not mine, but the great scholarly heritage of mankind. On his laws of conservation of energy, all modern physics (except quantum ...) is built, and as a result, all industry, mechanics and mechanisms.

    you yourself correctly answered that the bullet accelerates in the barrel and the maximum speed (and as a consequence the energy E = m * s2) at the cut of the barrel, and so at this moment there is a reaction, in this case, recoil.
    Further, in flight, the speed and, as a result, the energy of the bullet / projectile falls (and is not taken from nowhere)))

    And to all the minusers, I recommend re-studying the school program in physics (like there used to be a 5-7 grade program)), it’s not holy to believe Hollywood films that when a bullet hits, a person is thrown back by 2 meters))))

    How long have you shot ??? It seems NEVER !!!
  39. The comment was deleted.
  40. 0
    28 September 2015 04: 57
    a good thing, and with a competent approach, Shilka can also be used as fire support for infantry during the sweeping of city blocks ...
  41. 0
    28 September 2015 07: 05
    the question is who mined me to the comments stick ????? trolls raged ????? took for a living ???? and already Admins deal with trollism on the site - I beg you - they have a place on the Censor - not here!
  42. 0
    28 September 2015 07: 52
    Quote: NOMADE
    casts a person 2 meters

    As if there is an opinion, and not only mine, that when a 12.7 or 14.5 caliber bullet hits, it still drops.
    As a rule - also abroad of life.
  43. 0
    28 September 2015 07: 57
    # 20715 # 179873 # 19879
    How to swallow tequila is presented in Mexico. They cherish the tradition of its use, which has not changed for many years. It is recommended to trust only one more drink that says - "100 percent agave".
    For those who want to assess this drink, the Mexican residents are recommended to first try it, and only then fulfill the protocol about which to smell numerous - lick salt, drink a glass of tequila, eat lime. The habit of using tequila with salt so that lime is more than 70 years old. But from the very beginning, she was found, as far as a way to fight the epidemic of the "Spanish flu", which has been in Mexico.

    The very first test of taquila leaves in the mouth a sensation of the real taste of the drink, which will remain in the mouth longer than if you first taste the salt on your tongue.
    Some craftsmen advise eating a chili pepper before using tequila. For many beginners, these experiments can be very difficult.
    There are no perfect requirements for the dishes from which to really sip tequila. For the purpose of the individual, it is convenient to eat from glasses. Lovers of beauty are matched by long, tight glasses. They are called kaballito, which means "tiny bituk". There are a couple of ways of these glasses, different sizes and shapes.
    Usually, do not add anything excess (lemon, ice) to the drink with your own hands. The right drinkers of this drink drink tequila in small sips, savoring its intense agave relish.
    As so that abundant alcohol, the smell in tequila will unfold during this time, as soon as it becomes a constant home temperature. Cooling can hide it. However, this is not prohibited.
    There is an increased ritual of drinking tequila with tonic. Tequila is pre-poured, and there is a tonic, they drink spicy and shake it in one gulp. For them, a similar image is much better to use glasses.
    In Mexico, partial, drinking a glass of tequila, prefer not to bite it with lime, but wash it down with a non-alcoholic drink - sangrita, the greatest pleasure of which gets thanks to the presence of spices inside it. And also, it has tomato juice, so orange juice.
    There are many adherents who mix tequila with tonic. The glass is closed with a handle, quickly shakes with a blow on the table and is drunk in one gulp.
  44. 0
    28 September 2015 09: 54
    Super car!
  45. AAV
    0
    28 September 2015 10: 36
    Quote: NOMADE
    Newton is not mine, but the great scholarly heritage of mankind. On his laws of conservation of energy, all modern physics (except quantum ...) is built, and as a result, all industry, mechanics and mechanisms.

    you yourself correctly answered that the bullet accelerates in the barrel and the maximum speed (and as a consequence the energy E = m * s2) at the cut of the barrel, and so at this moment there is a reaction, in this case, recoil.
    Further, in flight, the speed and, as a result, the energy of the bullet / projectile falls (and is not taken from nowhere)))

    And to all the minusers, I recommend re-studying the school program in physics (like there used to be a 5-7 grade program)), it’s not holy to believe Hollywood films that when a bullet hits, a person is thrown back by 2 meters))))



    Sorry, but you gave the wrong formula. E = m * s2 eno is not Newton but Einstein. Obviously you wanted to give the formula for kinetic energy (m * V ^ 2) / 2
  46. 0
    28 September 2015 10: 52
    Quote: NOMADE
    And to all the minusers, I recommend re-studying the school program in physics (like there used to be a 5-7 grade program)), it’s not holy to believe Hollywood films that when a bullet hits, a person is thrown back by 2 meters))))

    And here in more detail.
    What happens to a fighter when a 12.7 or 14.5 bullet flies into him?
    From PTRD for example, Korda, DShK or KPVT?
    You say that nothing dangerous, I understand you correctly?
  47. 0
    28 September 2015 11: 17
    Dear alex86! In fact, from the theory of probability it will be correct W = 1 - (1 - 0,5) x (1 - 0,5) = 0,75. Although, in this case (only at 0,5 as a special case) the final result coincides.
  48. 0
    28 September 2015 11: 18
    Quote: TanakaKenshin
    Well, technically, Harrier can hang, for example ...

    Rare Harrier will fly to the middle of the Day ....
    Ugh. To places where Shilka may be.
    She will tear it on the British flag, sorry for my English ...
  49. 0
    28 September 2015 11: 27
    By the way, offhand a couple more application options.
    From cruise missiles, the Tomahawks are still not so inconspicuous and fast, but they fly low - to chop the very thing.
    Or in the mode of radio silence and good camouflage on the ground - ambushes on aircraft with external target designation at the beginning. Or helicopters, or rather.
    Apaches are going on the smallest, the outer radar has detected them, and it has been given to whom to meet.
    Although Apache is armored, it’s not omnipotent. And the Arrow to his Bochin will not hurt so much.
    Yes, and in the desert for 5 km, to drive Toyota Mujahideen without admitting to the guarded object is a nice thing.
    1. 0
      28 September 2015 11: 38
      What are you going to dragon? For ground targets 1,5 km.

      5 km is the far boundary of the zone of destruction of the Needle, which does not work on ground targets.
  50. 0
    28 September 2015 12: 01
    Something strongly I doubt that someone flies low in Syria. Secondly, there are not so many radars. In short it is doubtful. I would also understand fly there helicopters. And so, from 10 meters they hit you, and that’s it. And then below is full of idiots with MANPADS.
    1. 0
      28 September 2015 13: 02
      Quote: Fibrizio
      And so, from 10 meters they hit you, and that’s it.


      What did you enter and where did you get from 10 m?
  51. 0
    28 September 2015 12: 06
    Quote: Parsec
    What are you going to dragon? For ground targets 1,5 km.

    At distances exceeding 2500 m, shooting at air targets is ineffective and is allowed only for self-defense. It takes 3000 seconds to fly 23 m, 6-mm Shilka shells.
    ===================================
    Maximum firing range
    2000 m
    Minimum firing range
    200 m
    ==================================
    The Shilka self-propelled gun can also be used to destroy moving ground targets at a range of up to 2000 meters.
    ==================================

    And this is only the range of a direct shot. Sighting. On the ground, it’s not a fact that an infantry fighting vehicle will be able to roach faster than Shilka can do it.
    http://army-news.ru/2012/06/zsu-23-4-shilka-ona-plenila-39-gosudarstv/
    1. 0
      28 September 2015 12: 55
      Shilka's direct shot range is 1100 m.
      Read the technical specifications, at least at the table level you will have an idea of ​​what you are talking about.

      When was the last time you fired from a ZSU-23-4xx?
  52. +1
    28 September 2015 13: 00
    Quote: Shuttle
    Quote: dkflbvbh
    Moreover, under Soviet rule, they delivered missiles and called them "Tunguska"

    It’s all wrong, Comrade Lieutenant Colonel!
    Shilka: 4 × 23-mm
    Tunguska: 2 x 30 mm


    Tunguska 4*30 mm. Finally.
    1. 0
      28 September 2015 13: 04
      Quote: Parsec
      Tunguska 4*30 mm. Finally

      Fuck it...

      Caliber and brand of gun 2 × 30-mm 2A38

      1. +1
        28 September 2015 13: 19
        2A38 - 30 mm anti-aircraft gun, consisting of two barrels with one feed mechanism from a common belt and one firing mechanism, alternately working with the left and right barrel.

        Enlarge the picture and look carefully.
        1. 0
          28 September 2015 13: 28
          Quote: Parsec
          consisting of two barrels with one feed mechanism from a common belt and one firing mechanism, alternately working with the left and right barrel

          Yeah... thanks, I didn't know.
  53. 0
    28 September 2015 13: 19
    Quote: avia1991
    in 1985, the tank had to survive for 7 minutes. If such a mess happened, the tank commander who preserved a serviceable vehicle in battle would be promised a Hero of the Soviet Union without even looking...

    In those years, our tank armadas had to reach the English Channel.
    This will obviously take more than 7 minutes.
    So you have some incorrect information.
    1. 0
      28 September 2015 13: 33
      Quote: Webcelerator
      in 1985, a tank had to survive for 7 minutes

      There was such a figure. We were told 6-8. I have never seen this figure officially anywhere, only in words.

      It related directly to combat (this is when they shoot at you), and ...

      Quote: Webcelerator
      should have reached the English Channel

      ... and there is also such a thing as a “march”. There the tank “lives” much longer.
  54. 0
    28 September 2015 13: 21
    Quote: Parsec
    When was the last time you fired from a ZSU-23-4xx?

    My VUS is very different.
    1. +1
      28 September 2015 13: 31
      Those. You have no idea about a direct shot, but you declare.

      Boldly.
  55. -1
    28 September 2015 19: 29
    How can I make it work?

    http://sitedere.zyro.com/1630/skachat_drayvera_na_planshet_samsung_galaxy_note_n
    8000 Download drivers for samsung galaxy note n8000 tablet
    http://raspisaniemarsh.ru/1168/skachat_zhivye_oboi_s_mashinami_na_android_bespla
    tno Download live wallpaper with cars for Android free
    http://raspisaniesamolet.ru/805/kak_pereproshit_android_esli_on_zablokirovan Как перепрошить андроид если он заблокирован
    http://raspisaniedvizheniya.ru/586/android_ekspley_indigo_oshibka_kamery Андроид эксплей индиго ошибка камеры
    http://raspisaniedvizheniya.ru/1035/Android_x86_5_1_skachat Android x86 5 1 скачать
    http://raspisaniedvizheniya.ru/2778/Android_fragment_getid Android fragment getid
    http://raspisaniesamolet.ru/1432/skachat_terrariyu_na_android_full Скачать террарию на андроид full
    http://sitedere.zyro.com/426/android_igry_shahmaty_skachat Андроид игры шахматы скачать
    http://raspisaniesamolet.ru/1369/skachat_terraria_na_android_russkaya_versiya Скачать terraria на андроид русская версия
    http://raspisaniesamolet.ru/1169/luchshie_igry_dlya_android_kategorii_golovolomk
    i,_logicheskie_pazly The best games for android in the category puzzles, logical puzzles
  56. -1
    28 September 2015 19: 30
    How can I make it work?

    http://sitedere.zyro.com/1630/skachat_drayvera_na_planshet_samsung_galaxy_note_n
    8000 Download drivers for samsung galaxy note n8000 tablet
    http://raspisaniemarsh.ru/1168/skachat_zhivye_oboi_s_mashinami_na_android_bespla
    tno Download live wallpaper with cars for Android free
    http://raspisaniesamolet.ru/805/kak_pereproshit_android_esli_on_zablokirovan Как перепрошить андроид если он заблокирован
    http://raspisaniedvizheniya.ru/586/android_ekspley_indigo_oshibka_kamery Андроид эксплей индиго ошибка камеры
    http://raspisaniedvizheniya.ru/1035/Android_x86_5_1_skachat Android x86 5 1 скачать
    http://raspisaniedvizheniya.ru/2778/Android_fragment_getid Android fragment getid
    http://raspisaniesamolet.ru/1432/skachat_terrariyu_na_android_full Скачать террарию на андроид full
    http://sitedere.zyro.com/426/android_igry_shahmaty_skachat Андроид игры шахматы скачать
    http://raspisaniesamolet.ru/1369/skachat_terraria_na_android_russkaya_versiya Скачать terraria на андроид русская версия
    http://raspisaniesamolet.ru/1169/luchshie_igry_dlya_android_kategorii_golovolomk
    i,_logicheskie_pazly The best games for android in the category puzzles, logical puzzles
  57. -1
    28 September 2015 19: 30
    How can I make it work?

    http://sitedere.zyro.com/1630/skachat_drayvera_na_planshet_samsung_galaxy_note_n
    8000 Download drivers for samsung galaxy note n8000 tablet
    http://raspisaniemarsh.ru/1168/skachat_zhivye_oboi_s_mashinami_na_android_bespla
    tno Download live wallpaper with cars for Android free
    http://raspisaniesamolet.ru/805/kak_pereproshit_android_esli_on_zablokirovan Как перепрошить андроид если он заблокирован
    http://raspisaniedvizheniya.ru/586/android_ekspley_indigo_oshibka_kamery Андроид эксплей индиго ошибка камеры
    http://raspisaniedvizheniya.ru/1035/Android_x86_5_1_skachat Android x86 5 1 скачать
    http://raspisaniedvizheniya.ru/2778/Android_fragment_getid Android fragment getid
    http://raspisaniesamolet.ru/1432/skachat_terrariyu_na_android_full Скачать террарию на андроид full
    http://sitedere.zyro.com/426/android_igry_shahmaty_skachat Андроид игры шахматы скачать
    http://raspisaniesamolet.ru/1369/skachat_terraria_na_android_russkaya_versiya Скачать terraria на андроид русская версия
    http://raspisaniesamolet.ru/1169/luchshie_igry_dlya_android_kategorii_golovolomk
    i,_logicheskie_pazly The best games for android in the category puzzles, logical puzzles
  58. 0
    29 September 2015 01: 49
    at least 95 percent on the target, the destruction radius of the OFZT is 15 m, the tank will not stop but will become unusable shoots -16 per second from each barrel Guys, don’t touch my car