Nexter presented its two projects at DSEi

36

The last few years in the defense sector did not have enough of these new products, and therefore visitors to the DSEi exhibition were pleased to see that some companies still have gunpowder and are trying to invest in large projects.

Caesar 8x8

One such project is the Caesar 8x8 self-propelled howitzer, presented as a test model. Nexter started this project only at the beginning of this year. The reason for this is that the Caesar concept needed to be freed from the strong shackles of "compatibility with C-130." Indeed, while some potential buyers admired mobile performance Caesar howitzers on the chassis Unimog 6x6 or Renault 6x6, others regretted that the compatibility with the C-130 transport aircraft imposes severe restrictions on semiautomatic loading, an additional quantity of shells and charges and possibly additional cabin reservations .

Nexter presented its two projects at DSEi

The new Caesar 8x8 system is clearly aimed at operators for whom the C-130 transportability limits operational flexibility and does not fully adapt it to customer requirements. It may attract interest and some existing operators Caesar

Increased maneuverability, power reserve and large dimensions (but without excessive gigantism) made Nexter turn to the Czech company Tatra. These two companies have fairly strong business connections, as the Czech manufacturer has already once been selected as a landing gear supplier for the Titus high-mobility armored personnel carrier developed by the French Nexter. Tatra is also a regular winner of some of the toughest off-road rallies and races around the world, including the original Paris-Dakar race. High throughput is realized mainly due to the independent suspension with swinging bridges (the so-called ridge frame), connected to pneumatic shock absorbers, which allows to obtain a phenomenal wheel travel and constant contact with the ground, and hence optimal grip.


The self-propelled howitzer Caesar 6x6 in its current form has confirmed its reputation in the Middle East and Africa during the operation "Serval". All of its equipment, including guidance, navigation, fire control and radar measurements of the initial velocity, is stored on the 8x8 chassis.

Unlike other competing 155-mm wheel howitzers, the Caesar 8x8 cannon fires forward (the company does not sound in azimuth angles) and retains the old 6x6 configuration with rear stabilizer legs. For direct fire, the 155 / 52 can be lowered onto the cab. However, in addition to this, the Tatra 8x8 chassis allows you to implement many options that can be requested by customers, for example, various levels of automatic loader and cab protection up to Levels 2A or 2B. The chassis can be modified to carry 40 shots. In order to increase the number of customers, the T815 chassis itself already comes with the ability to install various power units. In addition to the standard diesel engine with air cooling Tatra power 410 hp on the chassis, you can install engines from MAN, Sizu and Renault / Volvo.


Caesar 8x8 4 September 2015, on the range in Rouen. Pictured is a machine with Tatra engine power 410 hp The Caesar 8x8 howitzer has a 12,3 meter length and a 2,8 meter width

As already mentioned, the machine presented at the DSEi exhibition is the first experimental model of a howitzer installed on the chassis; it is not even a prototype. At the Eurosatory exhibition (to which the company has already collected a sufficient number of questionnaires from potential customers), the car had an elongated cabin (on the first roll-out of a regular, civilian standard) in order to accommodate five crew members. Depending on the options that the customer chooses, the howitzer in the 8x8 configuration will weigh from 26 to 30,5 tons.

VBCI-2

Nexter presented one more novelty at the exhibition - a new version of the Vehicule Blinde de Combat d'Infanterie or VBCI-2. The VBCI vehicles of the French army have seen difficult times in Afghanistan and more recently in Mali, where, to the great satisfaction of their passengers, they saved their lives more than once. VBCI was mainly created in accordance with the requirements of the French army, but was also tested in several countries in the harsh conditions of extremely hot and cold climates. Currently, some of the French Army’s 630 machines VBCI are being upgraded, with many improvements that increase the total weight to 32 tons. But the case remains the same.


Many of these improvements are actually aimed at giving the car a second wind in the export market. A large number of improvements actually allows you to talk about a completely new designation of the machine, but despite the fact that only the basic welded body of aluminum armor was retained, it was decided to leave the name that had already become famous and give the car the designation VBCI-2.

Visible external changes

In fact, the revision of the car went in all directions. Improvements have been made to payload, mobility, firepower, windics, operational reliability, ergonomics and functional flexibility; the list goes on and on. Visually, what distinguishes the new version from the original VBCI is the design of the tower. Its front end was heavily sloped back, because the driver's seat was significantly shifted back due to the installation of additional electronics for driving. Then the much larger 16.00R20 wheels immediately strike the eye, whose 1,343 external diameter meter “fills wheel arches better” (there is nothing free in this world and each wheel (without a rim) weighs almost 112 kg, characteristics of hydraulic shock absorbers also had to be improved). However, three types of tires are available, which makes it possible to better match the terrain regarding the clutch.


The T40 CTA turret VBCI-2 has not only a cannon firing telescopic 40-mm ammunition, but also a remote-controlled combat module and, if necessary, MMP missile launchers on each side of the turret. From this side you can clearly see the new front sloping section of the tower.

Let's pay attention to the big difference with the former option between the wheels, especially between the two central bridges. A really large armored gondola under the hull, removed and replaced with a noticeably thicker armored bottom. The bottom is flat (as opposed to V-shaped). There are no details on the bottom design, but, according to Nexter engineers, “tests showed that the hull survived not only the detonation of a standard 10 kg mine, but also a detonation on a charge of more 20%. Officially, mine protection reaches the level of L4A-4B "and above", which is possible and applies to the mentioned 20%.

According to the company, the car has a ballistic protection L5 (30-mm armor-piercing sabot) with a potential increase to the level of L6. It also provides for the possibility of integrating active protection, and according to Nexter representatives, work is underway on several solutions.


The photo shows the rear steering axle, which allows you to reduce the turning radius to 17 meters

Back in the back of the car before you get into the troop compartment. A glance below the aft ramp reveals another significant change. The suspension system manufactured by Texelis and the rear axle, but already controlled, which made it possible to reduce the turning radius of the car to 17 meters. Indeed, one of the drawbacks of wheeled vehicles is that the thicker the steering wheel is, the less it turns before it touches the hull. In order to improve the situation, the new version is also “controlled a la tank” or almost by locking the wheels of one side and rotating the wheels of the other side the car turns around its axis.

Changes inside

The presence of the T40 tower basket CTA does not allow a direct visual comparison of the new configurations with the old one. However, a new type of splinterproof and other measures allowed Nexter to increase its total internal volume to 13 м3. New seats with other attachment points not only increase the level of protection against high vertical acceleration, but also provide better comfort and optimum stretching of the legs.


The troop compartment has a large overall height and more ergonomic and safe seats are installed in it. The external environment is displayed on the display screen (visible in the back of the car), which is controlled by the Nexter Crew Share system. Along the perimeter of the car, we see small cameras (two are installed above the doorway). These two cameras actually serve as rear-view mirrors for the driver.

The multi-function display in the aft compartment is proof of the presence of several outdoor video cameras, and the Nexter high-performance Crew Share wind kit is installed in the car. A set of wind sensors (vehicle electronics) is actually divided into two subsystems, one based on eight situational awareness cameras, distributing the picture among crew members, and the second serves everything related to mobility (power unit, inertial navigation and power management). Also, all information from optoelectronic systems and voice data goes directly to the Crew Share network.

In addition to the fact that the driver’s seat is shifted back, it is completely updated and includes a thermal imaging camera with an image displayed on the driver’s multifunctional display. Also, the driver has a digital periscope.

As a result…

The increase in weight to 32 tons, the increase in power of the air conditioning system (tested at 50 ° C), the increase in payload to 13 tons and the additional power consumption did not go unnoticed and for this we had to seriously add engine power. By car VBCI-2 installed diesel engine Volvo D13 power 600 hp coupled with a seven-speed automatic transmission ZF. It is worth noting that the engine, transmission and cooling system are made in a single unit.

Materials used:
www.forcesoperations.com
www.nexter-group.fr
www.wikipedia.org
www.defenseindustrydaily.com
36 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    29 September 2015 05: 27
    I understand that Caesar is a kind of response to the Swedish Archer? I watched the program about the Swedish self-propelled guns, it turned out a very good machine. The perfect counter-battery weapon
    1. +3
      29 September 2015 07: 43
      I agree that wheeled self-propelled guns are a rather interesting niche in artillery.
      1. +2
        29 September 2015 10: 30
        not just wheeled, chassis, but highly passable ....

        Nexter for the 2 time chooses the chassis, Tatra ....

        FH77 BW L52 Archer -on the chassis of an articulated Volvo A30D dump truck ...
        1. +4
          29 September 2015 14: 05
          KAMAZ-6560M

          carrying capacity - 24 tons, while the gross weight reaches 36 tons, the weight of the towed trailer is up to 15 tons.
          power reserve -1000 km ...
          ground clearance -400 mm ...
          KAMAZ-6560M "Tornado" :))) yesterday on the wind "Ural" "Tornado" was already, that a new name to come up with weak ????
          planned, for installation, anti-aircraft complexes "Pantsir-S" "Pantsir-SM")

          KAMAZ-6560M cab, But, it is very similar to the Nexter./Tatra cab .....

          1. 0
            29 September 2015 19: 40
            the Tatra will have a stronger frame!
          2. 0
            29 September 2015 19: 40
            the Tatra will have a stronger frame!
          3. +1
            29 September 2015 19: 57
            Quote: cosmos111
            carrying capacity - 24 tons,

            By the way, the carrying capacity and dimensions allow you to put here a package from the "Tornado". Thus, you can abandon the expensive and oversized MZKT chassis.
            rs: Although it looks somehow flimsy ..
    2. 0
      29 September 2015 14: 34
      Nexter contact the Czech company Tatra.


      everything "new", well forgotten OLD ...

      TATRA 813 8X8

      Tatra 813 - a heavy military truck Czechoslovak production, which from 1967 to 1982 years. produced by Tatra. The vast majority of them were intended for deliveries to the army both of Czechoslovakia itself and of other countries participating in the Warsaw Pact. Structurally, the car was a typical “Tatra” scheme - the design is based on the traditional Tatra spinal frame, which is a tube inside which transmission elements are located (such a frame is very resistant to bending and torsion, and also made it possible to make the chassis modular - cars with different wheels were produced base and number of axles), independent suspension of the swinging axle shafts of bridges, diesel air-cooled engine ..... T-930 engine - V12 multi-fuel diesel engine with air cooling,
      http://warweapons.ru/tatra-813-osminog-koloss/


      why didn’t they exploit / use these trucks in the USSR army ???
      in Afghanistan, definitely not one Tatra (s) was not ...
      1. +1
        29 September 2015 15: 04
        and more: the American company Navistar Defense LLC and the Czech Tatra in 2010, presented two new all-wheel drive tactical trucks, created on the Tatra chassis with a "backbone" tubular frame and independent suspension, equipped with Navistar engines and components, the trucks will be sold by Navistar Defense in North America ...
        http://www.autocentre.ua/tr/tracks/war-cars/parizhskiy-pokaz-18121.html

      2. +2
        29 September 2015 20: 28
        Quote: cosmos111
        why didn’t they exploit / use these trucks in the USSR army ???
        in Afghanistan, definitely not one Tatra (s) was not ...

        The most offensive thing is that the Tatra company was sold a couple of years ago due to bankruptcy for mere pennies .. Moreover, together with all the factories, equipment, backlog of trucks, and most importantly, with the rights to intellectual property! The price was a couple of tens of millions of euros why the hell did not buy it is not clear ...
    3. 0
      3 October 2015 07: 38
      No. It is just a modernization. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CAESAR_(%D0%A1%D0%90%D0%A3)
  2. -1
    29 September 2015 07: 14
    Not much about something else, the Czechs are outraged by the flow of refugees and "sing songs", we didn’t bomb, we didn’t take part in the war, but no, you guys are in the NATO bloc and do not produce equipment to plow the land, so everyone deserves it
  3. Owl
    +2
    29 September 2015 09: 25
    For local conflicts of low intensity, wheel machinery (BBM and self-propelled guns) has economic justification: low cost of production; mobility; lower costs during operation and in training crews (drivers). During the war of 1994-1996 and 1999-2001, such a technique would be useful to the Russian explosives.
    1. +2
      29 September 2015 10: 47
      Quote: Eagle Owl
      1999-2001 years, such a technique would be useful to the BB of Russia.

      YES and now in Syria .... security of the perimeter of military bases, port, will be in the army and the Navy .....
      and come in handy in Middle Asia ((the Taliban captured Kunduz))), the path to Tajikistan is open ...

      Nexter's VBCI-2 in general, a MASTERPIECE in wheeled BVMs, is currently one of the best in the world ...... although the competition in the 8x8 wheeled BVM market is fierce ...
      the whole modernization is aimed at increasing the SECURITY, ERGONOMICITY and COMFOTRA of the crew and the landing !!!!! and not any buoyancy / seaworthiness ....

      The T40 CTA turret VBCI-2 has not only a cannon firing telescopic 40-mm ammunition, but also a remote-controlled combat module and, if necessary, MMP missile launchers on each side of the turret. From this side you can clearly see the new front sloping section of the tower.


      ALL disputes are over, for Russian wheeled and tracked BBMs only BM AU-220M with 57 mm AP ......
      1. +1
        29 September 2015 13: 34
        Quote: cosmos111
        ALL disputes are over, for Russian wheeled and tracked BBMs only BM AU-220M with 57 mm AP ......
        and what you do not like the BMP-3 troicad?
        1. +1
          29 September 2015 14: 19
          Quote: wasjasibirjac

          and what you do not like the BMP-3 troicad?


          It suits EVERYONE, BUT on a Heavy BMP ((T-15 "Armata"))), with a DBM ... ideal ...

          availability in BC, cf. BMP 100 mm OFS .... when breaking through the armor, there is a high risk of detonation of the BC, with all the wiping out ....


          caliber 57 mm, makes it possible to work both on MBT ((with the presence of BOPS in lateral projection, and BMP / BTR, of any type, serial or promising, and with the presence of HE with remote detonation and enemy manpower)))

          CV-90 with 40 mm gun ... HE, shells with remote detonation, against infantry ...


          bourgeois, are already switching to all promising BMPs, for APs, not the caliber 35,40 mm .....
          1. +1
            30 September 2015 11: 44
            The 57mm module is most likely cheaper than the "triplet" and it will be much easier to learn / use .. The operator will not have to think about what to shoot from, calculate the trajectory, be able to work from closed positions .. Then he just saw everything in the sight and pressed the trigger .. 57mm ballistics will allow everything that is in line of sight to hit without problems, the HE effect is certainly not enough, but 3-4 shells will be enough for everything ..
            1. 0
              30 September 2015 12: 07
              Quote: max702
              The 57mm module is most likely cheaper than the "troika" and it will be much easier to learn / use .. The operator will not have to think about what to shoot from, calculate the trajectory, be able to work from closed positions.

              YES, Maxim hi more truly ... and the range of a direct shot, in 6 -... it matters ...
  4. 0
    29 September 2015 11: 34
    not well, but what are the caterpillars not happy with?
    1. +1
      29 September 2015 13: 27
      Quote: bmv04636
      Well, why do not caterpillars suit you?


      non-repair mileage (which will reduce the consumption of fuels and lubricants) .....
      GS, preferable on heavy cocks-chernozem, loam, Arctic ... BUT not like SR. Asia and Syria ...

      after 2500km, fingers were changed on the tracks when a backlash of 1.5-2 mm occurred, or a maximum of one or two tracks were removed, with an average repair of 7000 km the track was changed or depending on wear ....
      1. +2
        29 September 2015 22: 05
        wheeled vehicles all the more so such a great resource also cannot boast it is not a commercial vehicle. And how will we solve the issue with a high center of gravity and ride?
        1. 0
          30 September 2015 00: 37
          Quote: bmv04636
          will we solve the issue with a high center of gravity and a smooth ride?


          using independent hydropneumatic suspension ...

          and flat double bottoms ... Von Roll explosion-proof floor panels for vehicles
          http://elmatec.ru/durapreg-para-lite
    2. +1
      29 September 2015 14: 39
      More expensive to manufacture and maintain.
  5. +1
    29 September 2015 14: 46
    Nexter contact the Czech company Tatra ....... as the Czech manufacturer has already been selected once as the supplier of the chassis for the Titus high-mobility armored personnel carrier,

    interesting armored car, with excellent chassis ...

    the company creatively approached the creation of its BBM, on the Tatra-Nexter chassis, changed the layout of the Tatra 6x6 chassis bridges, the second bridge, usually located closer to the third bridge, was placed exactly in the middle between the first and third bridges ...

    it turned out, an extremely ergonomic, highly passable multifunctional chassis, with a highly protected armored capsule ......

    BBM TITUS: http: //eurasian-defence.ru/? Q = node / 28606

  6. +1
    29 September 2015 18: 43
    I liked Caesar, but VBCI - no. I absolutely do not understand why in the West all military equipment is obtained the height of a giraffe?
    1. 0
      30 September 2015 00: 08
      Quote: ivanovbg
      I don’t understand why in the West all military equipment is obtained the height of a giraffe?


      for the ergonomics of the troop compartment ....

      the height of the fighting compartment is critical when undermining armored vehicles ... so as not to break the cervical vertebrae ...

      between the head and the flow in the DO, there should be no 20 cm ((with cf ... growth in 1.80)))

      RG-35 has a large internal volume of the order of 15 m3
  7. -1
    29 September 2015 19: 42
    mine protection. Colonial Wars!
    1. +1
      30 September 2015 00: 10
      Quote: Zaurbek
      mine protection. Colonial Wars!

      in Afghanistan and Chechnya that we fought colonial wars ???
      1. 0
        30 September 2015 23: 01
        And what, colleague, did we wage wars there? National liberation? And was the Caucasian war nationally liberating?
      2. 0
        30 September 2015 23: 01
        And what, colleague, did we wage wars there? National liberation? And was the Caucasian war nationally liberating?
  8. +1
    29 September 2015 19: 59
    God himself ordered, within the framework of joint projects, to create an analogue of such a howitzer using the chassis of the Minsk Wheel Tractor Plant, Belarusian electronics (very good) and the Russian barrel. And then Old Man is straining our government to create its military equipment, and not just military electronics.
  9. +2
    29 September 2015 20: 27
    One such project is the Caesar 8x8 self-propelled howitzer,

    I do not know gentlemen - from my humble point of view, better or full-fledged tracked self-propelled guns or towed trunks ..

    Although for LOCAL conflicts may and yes ...
    1. +1
      30 September 2015 11: 48
      Quote: Olezhek
      Although for LOCAL conflicts may and yes ...

      So the last 70 years there were ONLY LOCAL conflicts! Maybe it's time to make specialized weapons for them? How long would the people survive if the equipment was designed not for the third world war, but for a local conflict?
      1. 0
        30 September 2015 12: 11
        Quote: max702
        How long would the people survive if the equipment was designed not for the third world war, but for a local conflict?


        well said!!! good
  10. +1
    30 September 2015 00: 41
    Quote: Olezhek
    Although for LOCAL conflicts may and yes ...

    And after the collapse of the USSR, NATO has all plans strictly for colonial wars with a technologically more backward enemy.
    It was the USSR that had plans "to reach the English Channel in 3 days" and exercises like Zapad-81 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PNybllbrrXY), the Russian Federation has simpler ambitions, and China has not yet at the technological level to pose a real threat.
    1. +1
      30 September 2015 03: 34
      Really? With tanks at the T90MS level? With MBRBCH? With analogs of "caliber" and "S-300" in service? I am inclined to think that the Chinese Army in Siberia would not have left us much chances.
      1. +1
        30 September 2015 11: 50
        I was not going to fight with China and the USSR without nuclear weapons .. So in case of conflict there will be one answer and the outcome of the conflict is one nuclear fox ..