The US is going to revise the program to reduce the number of troops in Afghanistan.

24
The US Department of Defense has decided to revise plans related to the reduction of the military contingent in Afghanistan. According to a Pentagon spokesman, if the American contingent is substantially reduced, it "will give the Taliban a chance to spread across Afghanistan."

The US is going to revise the program to reduce the number of troops in Afghanistan.


Edition Wall Street Journal writes about the recommendations that the American General Campbell sent to NATO. The recommendations speak of the need to "think" over the issue of revising the plan to reduce the number of military personnel of the Western "coalition" in Afghanistan. At the same time, other possible risks are reported, in addition to the expansion of territories controlled by the Taliban. The newspaper has not yet reported on these risks. Losing control of drug trafficking? No?..

One of Campbell's proposals is related to the need to leave in Afghanistan at least 10 NATO, including American, military personnel. Supposedly they will be able to effectively lead Afghanistan to peace.

At the same time, it is noted that in the recent stories there has already been a "negative experience" of a 100% withdrawal of American troops from Iraq. According to Campbell, the withdrawal of troops led to an escalation of conflict in this country and bloodshed. It is strange, but the entire adequate world believes that it was not the withdrawal, but the introduction of American troops into this state that led to bloodshed in Iraq ...
24 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    25 September 2015 06: 59
    Another proof that Obama was given the Nobel Prize by mistake.
    1. +7
      25 September 2015 07: 01
      Quote: katalonec2014
      The next proof

      And what, you also needed proof? belay
      1. 0
        25 September 2015 12: 25
        just want to stay. but to the point of them all the same as from a goat of milk. there is a lot of harm as always. benefit is zero.
    2. +3
      25 September 2015 07: 04
      Neither can they come in a human way, nor leave ..... what kind of Papuans are these pi ndosy!
    3. +10
      25 September 2015 07: 14
      The United States has absolutely nothing to do with the Taliban and has never been! Afghanistan occupies an important geopolitical position and the Anglo-Saxons, God knows, since when they have been trying to be there with their military contingents! Because from Afghanistan you can control the entire Middle and Middle East -because this is an ideal foothold! When the American fosterling-withdrew our troops from there, he committed a huge stupidity, which became, among other things, one of the main factors in the collapse of the USSR! Plus, a huge amount of drugs comes to us from there, to which the Americans turn a blind eye .. ., because it is profitable for them!
      They do not need a strong Afghanistan, but they need a puppet Afghanistan, and on the contrary, we need a strong Afghanistan, which is what the USSR tried to do, but ... Alas!
      1. +1
        25 September 2015 07: 25
        The arguments of American politicians about the benefits or harms contradict elementary logic, and the Pentagon generally applies only one criterion in assessing the correctness of its actions - this is a view of what is happening in the world from a position of strength.
      2. +1
        25 September 2015 10: 22
        Quote: Finches
        They do not need a strong Afghanistan, but they need a puppet Afghanistan, and on the contrary, we need a strong Afghanistan, which is what the USSR tried to do, but ... Alas!

        -------------------
        First of all, we need a friendly Afghanistan ... And they are not withdrawing troops apparently also because they are afraid of our influence in this strategic point or the Chinese ... And the policy of global domination and control cannot allow this ...
        1. 0
          25 September 2015 10: 42
          Strong, with our help - he is also friendly!
    4. +2
      25 September 2015 08: 02
      So they only control their bases. See Zones of Control in 2009 and 2014.
      1. +1
        25 September 2015 08: 18
        Quote: Lord of the Sith
        So they only control their bases

        Controlling, yes. And how will they supply them now? The logistics center in Ulyanovsk is closed, and so is the Manas airbase. Through Pakistan in columns or through Turkey by air? Expensive, to put it mildly, the provision will cost. Oh, the American warriors will have to change state property in ducans for havchik lol
        1. 0
          25 September 2015 09: 21
          THOUGHT THE SAME ABOUT TRANSPORTATION OF TOILET PAPER BY AIRCRAFT lol
  2. +2
    25 September 2015 07: 05
    One of Campbell's proposals is related to the need to leave in Afghanistan at least 10 NATO, including American, military personnel.

    Yeah battalions of forest brothers, rodents ,'re coming out .... and other bedding of the Americans, at their expense the contingent will be 10 sput. Airplanes stopped flying through Ulyanovsk, so the number of l / s has now increased in bags across the border like ants will carry.
  3. +4
    25 September 2015 07: 05
    I propose to send to Afghanistan battalions of Azov, tornadoes and other Pravoseks, led by Yarosh and Porubiy, to fight for democracy.
    1. +3
      25 September 2015 07: 07
      Quote: valokordin
      battalions of Azov, tornado and other Pravoseks led by Yarosh and Porubiy

      Reinforcements for the Taliban. Yes
      1. 0
        25 September 2015 08: 08
        Yes, the Taliban will strangle them on the first day. Who needs frostbitten, who except how good to eat and yell can not do anything?
    2. 0
      25 September 2015 07: 27
      You can't do this, drug traffic will grow to us several times!
      1. +2
        25 September 2015 08: 06
        Quote: Vitek
        You can't do this, drug traffic will grow to us several times!

        On the contrary, thefts will begin in the warehouses of drug lords.
    3. +2
      25 September 2015 08: 06
      Quote: valokordin
      I propose to send to Afghanistan battalions of Azov, tornadoes and other Pravoseks, led by Yarosh and Porubiy, to fight for democracy.


      http://www.vz.ru/world/2015/9/23/768458.html
      "At the landfill in Yavorov, the cases of refusal of the Ukrainian military personnel who passed the meat grinder in Novorossia to obey the instructors from the United States, who, from the point of view of these veterans, are full of salads,"
  4. +2
    25 September 2015 07: 07
    It's just that the drug traffic will come under the control of the Taliban, and the amers today need money more than ever.
    Economy, s. sad
  5. +1
    25 September 2015 07: 15
    "One of Campbell's proposals is connected with the need to leave in Afghanistan at least 10 thousand NATO, including American, military personnel. Supposedly they will be able to effectively lead Afghanistan to peace."

    Are they laughing or mocking? On the other hand, the more the American army scatters its forces, the better, in which case ...
  6. +2
    25 September 2015 07: 16
    Soon they will have to reconsider the number in all regions and protect their shores ... :)
  7. 0
    25 September 2015 07: 27
    In short, the idea looks something like this - to replace the American army with American PMCs.
    Leaving a world-class drug manufacturer to the mercy of some Taliban - I will never believe!
  8. +1
    25 September 2015 07: 29
    It is strange, but the entire adequate world believes that it was not the withdrawal, but the introduction of American troops into this state that led to bloodshed in Iraq ...

    The strangeness of American thinking is not surprising, but has long been alarming. To what, thanks to this thinking, is the World moving?
  9. 0
    25 September 2015 07: 55
    Well, let them get stuck in conflicts, less money will be left for re-equipping the army.
  10. 0
    25 September 2015 08: 19
    Quote: katalonec2014
    Another proof that Obama was given the Nobel Prize by mistake.

    And in my opinion, he is a mistake ...
  11. 0
    25 September 2015 09: 43
    however deer
  12. +1
    25 September 2015 09: 51
    If the Americans have entered somewhere, then it is problematic to expel them.
  13. 0
    25 September 2015 10: 30
    At least reduce, at least add the contingent. In my opinion, the situation will not change, because. in the comparison of the US-Taliban-Alqaida-ISIS there is no difference, there is only one goal - incapacitation and devastation.
  14. 0
    25 September 2015 10: 40
    The general will score, thinks that he will be forced to fight against a real enemy in Syria. At the base in Afghanistan he wants to sit out, as if in a war, and there the pension is not far away laughing
  15. +1
    25 September 2015 12: 42
    In Syria, the Russians, in Iraq, the Persians, in Pakistan, China, and in order to maintain their influence on the BV Yankees, a military bridgehead in Afghanistan is vital. But I think Uncle Volodya will be against it.
  16. 0
    25 September 2015 13: 39
    they are bearded there and so cut