Military Review

The US is going to revise the program to reduce the number of troops in Afghanistan.

24
The US Department of Defense decided to revise plans related to the reduction of the military contingent in Afghanistan. According to the official representative of the Pentagon, if the American contingent is substantially reduced, then this “will provide a chance for the Taliban to spread across the territory of Afghanistan.”


The US is going to revise the program to reduce the number of troops in Afghanistan.


Edition Wall Street Journal writes about the recommendations that the American General Campbell sent to NATO. The recommendations state that it is necessary to “think over” the issue of revising the plan for reducing the number of troops of the western “coalition” in Afghanistan. At the same time, other possible risks are reported, in addition to the expansion of the territories controlled by the Taliban. The newspaper has not yet reported on these risks. Loss of control over drug trafficking? Not?..

One of Campbell's proposals is related to the need to leave in Afghanistan at least 10 thousands of NATO, including American, military personnel. Allegedly, they will be able to effectively lead Afghanistan to the world.

It is noted that in recent stories There was already a “negative experience” of the 100% withdrawal of American troops from Iraq. According to Campbell, the withdrawal of troops led to an escalation of the conflict in this country and bloodshed. Strange, but the whole adequate world believes that it was not a withdrawal, but the entry of American troops into this state that led to the bloodshed in Iraq ...
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com
24 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. katalonec2014
    katalonec2014 25 September 2015 06: 59
    +4
    Further evidence that Obama was given the Nobel Prize by mistake.
    1. Vladimirets
      Vladimirets 25 September 2015 07: 01
      +7
      Quote: katalonec2014
      The next proof

      And what else, and evidence was needed? belay
      1. Sterlya
        Sterlya 25 September 2015 12: 25
        0
        just want to stay. but it’s all the same to them as a goat’s milk. harm as always a lot. good zero.
    2. kocclissi
      kocclissi 25 September 2015 07: 04
      +3
      Neither come humanly nor leave ..... what kind of Papuans are these pi indos!
    3. Finches
      Finches 25 September 2015 07: 14
      10
      The United States has absolutely nothing to do with the Taliban, and it never has! Afghanistan occupies an important geopolitical position and the Anglo-Saxons, God knows, since when they have been trying to be there with their military contingents! Because from Afghanistan you can control the entire Middle and Middle East -because this is an ideal foothold! When the American fosterling-withdrew our troops from there, he committed a huge stupidity, which became, among other things, one of the main factors in the collapse of the USSR! Plus, a huge amount of drugs goes to us, to which the Americans turn a blind eye .. ., because it is profitable for them!
      They don’t need a strong Afghanistan, but they need a puppet Afghanistan, and we need a strong Afghanistan, which is what the USSR tried to do, but ... Alas!
      1. Dembel77
        Dembel77 25 September 2015 07: 25
        +1
        The arguments of American politicians about the benefits or harms are contrary to elementary logic, and the Pentagon generally applies only one criterion in assessing the correctness of its actions - this is a view of what is happening in the world from a position of strength.
      2. Altona
        Altona 25 September 2015 10: 22
        +1
        Quote: Finches
        They don’t need a strong Afghanistan, but they need a puppet Afghanistan, and we need a strong Afghanistan, which is what the USSR tried to do, but ... Alas!

        -------------------
        We need friendly Afghanistan, first of all ... And they don’t apparently withdraw their troops because they are afraid of our influence at this strategic point or Chinese ... And the policy of global domination and control cannot allow this ...
        1. Finches
          Finches 25 September 2015 10: 42
          0
          Strong, with our help - he is also friendly!
    4. Lord of the Sith
      Lord of the Sith 25 September 2015 08: 02
      +2
      So they only control their bases. See the control zones in 2009 and in 2014.
      1. Penetrator
        Penetrator 25 September 2015 08: 18
        +1
        Quote: Lord of the Sith
        So they only control their bases

        They control, yes. And how will they supply now? The logistics center in Ulyanovsk is closed, the Manas airbase too. Through Pakistan in columns or through Turkey by air? Expensive, to put it mildly, the provision will cost. Oh, the American warriors will have to change state property in dukans for havchik lol
        1. vyinemeynen
          vyinemeynen 25 September 2015 09: 21
          0
          THE SAME THOUGHT ABOUT THE DELIVERY OF TOILET PAPER BY AIRCRAFT lol
  2. Sergey-72
    Sergey-72 25 September 2015 07: 05
    +2
    One of Campbell’s proposals is related to the need to leave at least 10 NATO, including American, military personnel in Afghanistan.

    Yeah, battalions of forest brothers, rodents, ukro ...., and other litter of Americans, at their expense the contingent will be 10 sput. Airplanes through Ulyanovsk stopped flying, so the number of l / s has now increased gerych in bags across the border like ants will carry.
  3. valokordin
    valokordin 25 September 2015 07: 05
    +4
    I propose to send to Afghanistan battalions of Azov, tornadoes and other law enforcement officers, led by Yarosh and Porubiy to fight for democracy.
    1. Vladimirets
      Vladimirets 25 September 2015 07: 07
      +3
      Quote: valokordin
      battalions of Azov, tornadoes and other law-enforcement agencies led by Yarosh and Porubiy

      Reinforcements for the Taliban. yes
      1. asadov
        asadov 25 September 2015 08: 08
        0
        Yes, the Taliban will strangle them on the first day. Who needs frostbitten, who except how good to eat and yell can not do anything?
    2. Vityok
      Vityok 25 September 2015 07: 27
      0
      You can’t do this, drug trafficking will grow to us several times!
      1. Lord of the Sith
        Lord of the Sith 25 September 2015 08: 06
        +2
        Quote: Vitek
        You can’t do this, drug trafficking will grow to us several times!

        On the contrary, thefts will begin to be stolen in drug depots.
    3. Dryuya2
      Dryuya2 25 September 2015 08: 06
      +2
      Quote: valokordin
      I propose to send to Afghanistan battalions of Azov, tornadoes and other law enforcement officers, led by Yarosh and Porubiy to fight for democracy.


      http://www.vz.ru/world/2015/9/23/768458.html
      "At the landfill in Yavorov, the cases of refusal of the Ukrainian military personnel who passed the meat grinder in Novorossia to obey the instructors from the United States, who, from the point of view of these veterans, are full of salads,"
  4. Grbear
    Grbear 25 September 2015 07: 07
    +2
    It’s just that drug trafficking will come under the control of the Taliban, and today the amers need money more than ever.
    Economy s. sad
  5. mamont5
    mamont5 25 September 2015 07: 15
    +1
    "One of Campbell's proposals is related to the need to leave in Afghanistan at least 10 NATO, including American, military personnel. Supposedly, they will be able to effectively lead Afghanistan to peace."

    Are they laughing or mocking? And on the other hand, the more the Amer army disperses its forces, the better, in which case ...
  6. slizhov
    slizhov 25 September 2015 07: 16
    +2
    Soon they will have to review the numbers in all regions and protect their shores ... :)
  7. APASUS
    APASUS 25 September 2015 07: 27
    0
    In short, the idea looks something like this - to replace the American army with American PMCs.
    Throw the world-class drug manufacturer to the mercy of some Taliban - I will never believe it!
  8. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 25 September 2015 07: 29
    +1
    Strange, but the whole adequate world believes that the withdrawal of blood in Iraq was not led to, but the entry of American troops into this state ...

    The strangeness of American thinking does not surprise, but has long been alarming. What is the reason the world is moving toward?
  9. 2sila
    2sila 25 September 2015 07: 55
    0
    Well, let them get stuck in conflicts, less money will be left for re-equipping the army.
  10. vell.65
    vell.65 25 September 2015 08: 19
    0
    Quote: katalonec2014
    Further evidence that Obama was given the Nobel Prize by mistake.

    And in my opinion, he is a mistake ...
  11. AdekvatNICK
    AdekvatNICK 25 September 2015 09: 43
    0
    however deer
  12. roskot
    roskot 25 September 2015 09: 51
    +1
    If the Americans entered somewhere, then expelling them is problematic.
  13. Tanker55
    Tanker55 25 September 2015 10: 30
    0
    At least reduce, at least add contingent. In my opinion, the situation will not change, because There is no difference in comparing the USA-Taliban-Alkaida-ISIS, there is one goal — the incapacitation and destruction.
  14. Denis DV
    Denis DV 25 September 2015 10: 40
    0
    The general will argue, thinks that he will be forced to fight against a real enemy in Syria. He wants to sit out at the base in Afghanistan, as if in a war, and there the pension is not far laughing
  15. ASG7
    ASG7 25 September 2015 12: 42
    +1
    In Syria, the Russians, in Iraq, the Persians, in Pakistan, China, and in order to maintain their influence on the BV Yankees, a military bridgehead in Afghanistan is vital. But I think Uncle Volodya will be against it.
  16. Taygerus
    Taygerus 25 September 2015 13: 39
    0
    they are bearded there and so cut