Popular Mechanics: Watching the T-90, it's hard not to admire this fighting vehicle

39
The American magazine Popular Mechanics has published material about the Russian military tank third generation T-90, which notes that despite the fact that this machine will leave the world stage after the release of T-14 Armata, it certainly deserves admiration.



“These days the battle tank T-90 no longer rules the ball when it comes to Russian heavy military equipment ... the new pearl of Russian tanks today is Armata. However, watching T-90, it’s hard not to admire this fighting machine, ”quotes an excerpt from RIA material. "News".

In support of the publication leads the video with a shot of the tank at the time of taking off the ground. It is noted that the shake-up of the camera was not due to the fact that a huge car landed on the ground.



“While the T-90 weighs almost 46 tons, that“ shake-up ”that you see is the shock wave from a shot in the air of a smooth-bore gun in the 125 mm,” notes the publication.

T-90 - the main Russian battle tank, which was developed in the late 1980-x early 1990-'s. It was put into service in 1992 year. In the period from 2001 to 2010, the year was the leader in sales on world arms markets.
39 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +36
    21 September 2015 07: 41
    Well, finally, wait!
    They used to blame everything.
    Now flogged!
    Are you dissuading from T-14? Like, this one is good with you, why do you need one more?
    1. +34
      21 September 2015 07: 50
      Quote: ImPerts
      Well, finally, wait!
      They used to blame everything.
      Now flogged!
      Are you dissuading from T-14? Like, this one is good for you, why do you need one more?


      No, they are looking forward to the dominance of the T-90 in Syria ...
      1. +19
        21 September 2015 07: 59
        Tanais
        Quote: ImPerts
        No, they are looking forward to the dominance of the T-90 in Syria ...


        You are a big plus for your comment, but you could say a little differently: justify the loss of their most super-duper unique "Abrams" wink
        1. +13
          21 September 2015 08: 06
          Quote: major071
          You are a big plus for your comment, but you could say a little differently: justify the loss of their most super-duper unique "Abrams"

          Thank you for evaluating the comment, but it is important to note that in this case, the Americans have already prepared a cliche, the answer:

          -and the armor is not the same, and indeed ...

          1. +5
            21 September 2015 08: 37
            Quote: Tanais
            -and the armor is not the same, and indeed ...

            Houston! We have problems! lol
            1. +10
              21 September 2015 09: 02
              Quote: Andrey Yurievich
              Houston! We have problems!


              Definitely...
        2. +24
          21 September 2015 08: 13
          Abrams is g ...! Created to fight wild tribes armed with bow and arrows! Hefty fool-coffin for 4 people! Tanks can make two nations - Russians and Germans! A little more Israelis, and even that, because there "a quarter of our people"
          1. +4
            21 September 2015 12: 53
            Quote: Finches
            Tanks can be made by two nations - the Russians and the Germans! A little more Israelis, and even then, because there are "a quarter of our people"

            --------------------
            For those who forgot ... Tanks in Chelyabinsk Tankograd during the war years were made by Joseph Yakovlevich Kotin and Major General Isaac Moiseevich Zaltsman ...
          2. +10
            21 September 2015 12: 58
            Quote: Finches
            Abrams is g ...! Created to fight wild tribes armed with bow and arrows! A hefty fool-coffin for 4's! [/ i]

            But no. Abrams is not such a bad tank. It was created as a response to the avalanche of inexpensive and well-armed Soviet tanks (and of other countries of the Warsaw Treaty). His main task should have been actions from ambushes, support of fortified areas. In short, positional battles. Therefore, the gun is rifled, and the power reserve is not so large, and the reservation is mainly the upper part of the front hemisphere. This is a tank for defense, not for attack. This is what the Germans taught Americans by fighting with us.
            Our T-72 / T-90 is an analogue of the darkness of the Horde riders. Lightweight, fast, well-protected, but most importantly - massive. Because inexpensive and very, very (!) Easy to use. And that means reliable. This is what we ourselves learned by defeating the Germans.

            Z.Y. Even now, I could teach any Turkmen to shoot from my 72 river where he served in the 87-88 year. He would teach in two or three days not just to shoot, but also to hit if he had finished at least 8 classes. And if he hadn’t finished, then in four days. Hуthe bottom car was. T-90 is probably no worse.
            1. +3
              21 September 2015 13: 17
              Quote: Shuttle
              The T-90 is probably no worse.

              And the T-90MS is generally a good machine ... drawing analogies with fighter aircraft, then Armata is PAK FA, and T-90MS is SU-35S hi
            2. The comment was deleted.
            3. +1
              21 September 2015 14: 52
              Respect and respect, operator-gunner T-72! Trans-Baikal Military District, p. Peschanika! drinks
            4. The comment was deleted.
        3. 0
          21 September 2015 23: 08
          But what kind of "super-duper", just a heavy tank, and without any additional. bells and whistles, "s" after all, "zanadto" tight-fisted in terms of supplying "conditional" allies of normal technology always "shake off" frank "junk"; so in my opinion, the "Abrams" in the Middle East are just scrap metal which instead of being melted down went to war (something like this the same as the "English" "Saxons" to Ukraine).
      2. +3
        21 September 2015 08: 26
        Syria is now the number one topic becoming. They will gradually forget about hohland ...
    2. +2
      21 September 2015 09: 40
      will not work, we will have both T-14 and T-90s !!! T-90 will compete on an equal footing with NAT's "menagerie" !!!
      1. +9
        21 September 2015 09: 54
        Better no one fights with anyone. Why are you so bloodthirsty. Let us drag our "partners" to the tank biathlon first. There they will do it to the fullest and realize everything themselves.
        1. 0
          21 September 2015 15: 14
          Let us drag our "partners" to the tank biathlon first.
          I think I know how one could try: through money. There are a lot of ways invented (all sorts of Olympiads, professional boxing, Formula 1, etc.), you just need to take the appropriate one and modify it, based on the conditions.
          Punds are greedy for money, as a result, the loot will win anyway. Well, we will look at fascinating events.
      2. +3
        21 September 2015 10: 15
        Quote: Alexey-74
        will not work, we will have both T-14 and T-90s !!! T-90 will compete on an equal footing with NAT's "menagerie" !!!


        And here, Alexei, I will disappoint you. In the program of modernization and rearmament of the RF Ministry of Defense, a decision was made to further modernize the 72 series, the T-90, not a word. Why dont know. Already wrote on this topic, but there were no comments.
      3. +4
        21 September 2015 12: 10
        Quote: Alexey-74
        will not work, we will have both T-14 and T-90s !!! T-90 will compete on an equal footing with NAT's "menagerie" !!!

        God forbid, of course, but ... if it happens, we will not fight in the Aprmats or even in the 90s, but on the T-72 and T-80, even the T-55 will be used
        1. +1
          21 September 2015 12: 39
          I completely agree. something is not said about the number and percentage of the T-90 to the total number of armored vehicles. So the bulk of this is the T-72, without additional systems that improve the survivability of the tank. and even in the event of a large-scale war, bridgeheads ("tank fists") with military equipment will be destroyed by atomic missiles.
  2. +5
    21 September 2015 07: 42
    Handsome tank!
    1. +5
      21 September 2015 07: 52
      a miracle of technology ... if levitation tanks appear, then they will appear only in Russia
    2. +1
      21 September 2015 07: 56
      Yeah!!! Here are such US handsome men good Not like THEM Abrams am
      1. +26
        21 September 2015 07: 57
        Quote: Voha_krim
        Yeah!!! These are the beauties of US. Not just THEM Abramsa


        From Popular Mechanics not included in the video lol
  3. +4
    21 September 2015 07: 49
    Respect to the defense industry. Death to the Abrams, anyway from the weapons of which tank, most importantly, from a tank of Soviet or Russian production.
  4. +13
    21 September 2015 07: 52
    an acquaintance went to Tagil to the exhibition, says that during a shot in flight, the cap was ripped off the head of the public. :-)
    1. +2
      21 September 2015 09: 58
      Breshet .... lol
      1. +3
        21 September 2015 10: 28
        Quote: DmitryK
        Breshet ....


        Dmitry, definitely!
        Sound, yes loud, but the caps did not fly off, far away. Security measures at the exhibition are thought out very competently, we must pay tribute. In this regard, the organizers are great, they do not give the "enemies" a reason for discussion.
  5. +2
    21 September 2015 08: 03
    During a single shot in the city, glass fly out.
    1. +7
      21 September 2015 08: 10
      Quote: Zaurbek
      During a single shot in the city, glass fly out.

      Glazier's dream lol Yes laughing
  6. +3
    21 September 2015 08: 06
    Krasava, in general, like all Russian military equipment.
  7. +12
    21 September 2015 08: 08
    The tank itself is a weapon of excellence.
    And the T-90 is perfection multiplied by grace.)))
    wink
    1. +7
      21 September 2015 09: 08
      Quote: Aleks tv
      And the T-90 is perfection multiplied by grace.)))

      As they say, THEIR TANKS FOR LIFE, AND OURS FOR WAR. At the same time, Armata, I’m sure will be a fighter in the cube. And in the west, something comparable will appear only after 10 years
  8. +1
    21 September 2015 08: 11
    Again hurray-patriotism, firstly, according to the designers of "Armata", this is a platform, and the T-14 "Armata" is a tank, and secondly, the criterion "best" is conditional and this applies to everything, according to intelligence from Great Britain, there are up to 147 tanks in the territory controlled by ISIS " Abrams "are in various technical conditions (mostly badly damaged), so there is a high probability that our T-90 and Abramsa will meet, but for some reason everyone is focusing on meeting these tanks, while the militants also have a lot of T-72s, which just the same in Syria, wait and see
    1. +2
      21 September 2015 08: 26
      Lord !!! There is a time for everything .... Armata is the tank of the future, the T-90 is the present, but if something happens, they will complement each other, do not hesitate .... angry
      1. 0
        21 September 2015 08: 40
        It is unlikely that "Armata" is a new concept of combat. Autonomous sections with tanks, infantry fighting vehicles, air defense systems, heavy flamethrower and artillery systems, supplies are supposed, autonomous actions, this is how the "Armata system" will operate
    2. +1
      21 September 2015 10: 21
      The only trouble is that the militants do not have tank schools and are not expected. So, as flew on carts (gan-trucks), so will be, tanks for them are useless trash, especially damaged. And about ura-patriotism ... Who are you trying to scare with broken abrashkas without crews? laughing
      1. +2
        21 September 2015 13: 58
        Quote: Observer 33
        , tanks for them useless trash, especially damaged. ... Who are you trying to scare with broken abrashes without crews?

        Do you think that not a single professional military man joined ISIS, that IS fighters did not receive, among other things, training in American weapons and equipment? Where did their military victories come from, which were very serious within the region?
        1. +2
          21 September 2015 16: 02
          Perhaps it's not the military who joined. No wonder it was reported that during the attack on the marines of the Russian Federation "The captured militants had plans for an air base and satellite images with marked points of important military facilities." ISIS has its own companions?
          http://novorus.info/news/events/40117-morpehi-rossii-razgromili-bandu-igil-napav
          shuyu-na-bazu-v-sirii.html
  9. +3
    21 September 2015 08: 21
    Why would he "to leave the world stage after the appearance of the T-14 Armata"? He is 20 years old to jump.

    What did Shit-Serdyukov tell about the "outdated" (time-tested) T-90 scheme, which is supposedly far from the "Leopard"?
  10. +3
    21 September 2015 08: 24
    Popular mechanics is a very interesting magazine. By the way, it’s probably hard to call what is printed with us an American magazine. In November 2002, the first issue of the magazine in Russian was released. The first time in the issues was from 4 to 8 translated articles borrowed from the American version of the journal; since 2006, the number of translations does not exceed two articles in the issue. All content is entirely created by the editors of the Russian Popular Mechanics. Can you imagine that in the American version of the magazine, they will sing laudatory odes to our T-90? smile hi
  11. +3
    21 September 2015 08: 30
    T-80 also knew how.
    1. 0
      21 September 2015 09: 20
      Quote: Yoon Klob
      T-80 also knew how.


      Why in the past tense?
  12. +10
    21 September 2015 08: 40
    "... the new pearl of Russian tanks today is the Armata ..." - On Saturday, September 19, the City Day was celebrated in Rostov-on-Don. On the second, there were more festive events. For example, the "Family Ball", where Carnival of strollers:
  13. -1
    21 September 2015 09: 35
    This is an article "give money" they have everything super duper there, urgently the dough LEFT
  14. +2
    21 September 2015 09: 39
    After such a focus on Leclerc, the driver’s mechanic was hospitalized with a spinal injury.
    1. +1
      21 September 2015 10: 04
      Quote: kolkulon
      After such a focus on Leclerc, the driver’s mechanic was hospitalized with a spinal injury.


      Diagnosis (For Leclerc) - POSTERS!
      1. +1
        21 September 2015 10: 22
        Quote: Tanais
        Quote: kolkulon
        After such a focus on Leclerc, the driver’s mechanic was hospitalized with a spinal injury.


        Diagnosis (For Leclerc) - POSTERS!



        Well, when they learn to forge steel and make the right torsion bars for example ... then maybe they will catch up. For the abrams, such jumps are simply not possible. The spine in his pants gets enough sleep.
  15. +1
    21 September 2015 10: 13
    this machine will leave the world stage after the release of the T-14 Armata
    Yes, do not worry, yet, will not leave soon. Given that in a number of countries the T-55s are still in service, you can still admire the forty years. And bump into him somewhere else in Africa.
    Many countries now can only dream of such tanks. Yes, what is far to go? Won Ukraine restores rotten 64 matches, for them the T-90 is a dream, now a pipe dream, true lol So, what will you see in his case, do not hope after the armies receive Armat for scrap, we will not let the Syrians, for example, will leave two hundred, and your "back yard", I think, will buy wink
    1. +2
      21 September 2015 14: 02
      Quote: Observer 33
      Won Ukraine restores rotten 64 matches, for them the T-90 is a dream, now a pipe dream, true

      There is no need to treat the ruin with such disdain - the people there are no worse. Their "Oplot" and "Bulat" are very serious modernizations of a good car.
  16. 0
    21 September 2015 10: 30
    I can imagine what it is like to hear the US military-industrial complex and the very famous German creators of armored monsters ... But we have no money for "Armata" now, and therefore let it be finalized so that it becomes a real pearl.
  17. 0
    21 September 2015 10: 34
    Popular Mechanics magazine is quite popular among specialists, and such advertising of our tanks is pleasant for readers and useful for our manufacturers. By the way "Uralvagonzavod" is in the West, and not only very popular. Many Americans do not know where Ukraine is located, but they know about this our enterprise.
  18. 0
    21 September 2015 11: 28
    The one who makes and sells a large series is the world leader.
  19. 0
    21 September 2015 12: 12
    What was the shit-serdyukov talking about about the "outdated" (time-tested) T-90 scheme, which is supposedly far from the "Leopard"? [/ Quote]


    Yes, he is generally a furniture maker or rather a sales manager.
    So he knew about tanks only by hearsay.
  20. 0
    21 September 2015 14: 46
    Quote: Tanais
    Quote: Yoon Klob
    T-80 also knew how.

    Why in the past tense?

    Yes, somehow withdrawn from service. Himself :(