In 2016, the Irkutsk division will receive the latest ICBM RS-26.

38
A source in the Russian military-industrial complex told a TASS journalist that the Irkutsk Guards Missile Force will adopt a new solid-fuel intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) with the working title PC-26, which is based on the PC-24 Yars.



“Serial production should start at the end of the year, next year the first regiment will take up combat duty in the Irkutsk Strategic Missile Forces division,” said a defense industry official.


Previously, there were reports that the RS-26 will adopt the Irkutsk Guards Missile Force in the 2015 year, but due to the transfer of tests, the timing of the start of combat duty also shifted.


The PC-26 missile, also known as the Boundary, was created on the basis of the PC-24 Yars. It is planned that it will be somewhat lighter than the Yars, however, it will receive improved combat equipment and a split head. To launch rockets, only mobile complexes will be used - no mine-based options are provided.
38 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +9
    17 September 2015 06: 42
    In the valleys and on the hills, this complex will run.
    Russia has such dimensions that only such options should be used.
    Try to find a needle in a haystack.
    1. +5
      17 September 2015 06: 51
      Good news and it will obviously spoil the nerves of our sworn "partners". Yes
      1. +1
        17 September 2015 08: 05
        And it was precisely because of the Boundary that barrels began to roll at us that Russia was violating the INF Treaty. It is interesting that they changed so hastily in the still completely new Yars that it caused such hysteria in the West?
        1. +4
          17 September 2015 08: 26
          Officially, they are not satisfied with the range. It is believed that it can hit less than 5500 km, i.e. it is a medium-range missile. In fact, nervousness due to the more perfect filling, the ability to overcome missile defense and the compactness of the complex, which makes it even less noticeable compared to the "older brothers".
          1. 0
            17 September 2015 12: 43
            Along the flat path, Rubezh covers the entire euro collective farm
    2. +1
      17 September 2015 06: 59
      Running in peacetime is unprofitable. It is necessary to provide intelligence, combat protection, protection from terrorists ... And as they say, they are also found from outer space. Can additionally use mock-ups of such installations to deceive tracking satellites? And hide them in underground tunnels in mountainous areas?
      1. -4
        17 September 2015 07: 11
        Quote: kuz363
        Running in peacetime is unprofitable. It is necessary to provide intelligence, combat protection, protection from terrorists ... And as they say, they are also found from outer space. Can additionally use mock-ups of such installations to deceive tracking satellites? And hide them in underground tunnels in mountainous areas?


        This is the problem that they run a little, stand in debt in hangars and the whole idea of ​​running away is reduced to zero. The Iskanders also put in hangars and proclaimed this to be a help to preserve the materiel.
      2. +3
        17 September 2015 07: 56
        Running in peacetime is unprofitable.

        And they train constantly. And in the threatened period, they simply dump them from the hangars into the taiga and look for them later. Autonomy allows.
  2. +2
    17 September 2015 06: 43
    Guaranteed shock provided.
    1. 0
      17 September 2015 09: 28
      The guaranteed strike was provided by the "Voevoda", that's how they will do something like that then you can be sure.
  3. dFG
    +1
    17 September 2015 06: 46
    But if a platform were installed on the Kamaz chassis, then in general a glimpse would
    1. 0
      17 September 2015 07: 31
      Are you dear, are you ready to put on "Kamaz" and the Kremlin? And what about the "mobile" duma, "mobile" government, and, with the conduct of exercises throughout Russia, you look and order would be more
      1. +3
        17 September 2015 08: 02
        It is necessary to restore production at the Kurgan plant of wheeled tractors, if only something remains from the plant.
    2. -1
      17 September 2015 07: 31
      Are you dear, are you ready to put on "Kamaz" and the Kremlin? And what about the "mobile" duma, "mobile" government, and, with the conduct of exercises throughout Russia, you look and order would be more
  4. +2
    17 September 2015 06: 51
    Himself from Irkutsk, hello to fellow countrymen! The area of ​​the Irkutsk region is larger than the area any countries in Europe. Do you want to look there, which is specially hidden - a flag in your hands!
  5. +3
    17 September 2015 06: 54
    But interesting is the Irkutsk Strategic Rocket Forces Division where is based on Cuba or Argentina? bully
    1. +7
      17 September 2015 07: 14
      The best question for discussion, because it is not entirely clear where the "Rubezh" can fly with a range of 6 km from Irkutsk. Before Berlin, Paris, London, there is definitely no. I ask you not to offer the Baltics: 1,2 mgt at their borders with one APU is too much.
      There are several options:
      1. Areas of deployment of nuclear submarines of potential partners. It is doubtful - BB is excessively accurate.
      2. Just in case. The case is the aggravation of "friendship" with all sorts of dragons.
      3. For a while, to shut up in the vastness of Siberia. The time and time in this case is a threatened period during which to overtake the economy closer to the goals (referencing the terrain and entering target designation are not critical).
      4. Other, for the source of my imagination has dried up.
      1. -18
        17 September 2015 07: 37
        Quote: Moore
        4. Other, for the source of my imagination has dried up

        Preserve until Russia shrinks to the size of Siberia.
        And then gasp !!!
        Just do not persuade me in cases.
        In place of the European part of Russia, the Khazar Kaganate is planned.
        Take a close look at who is in power.
        1. +6
          17 September 2015 07: 52
          Babr, you’ll grab the minuses now. But I would like to ask a question: who did this squeeze grow to compress Russia to the size of Siberia without unacceptable damage to itself?
          1. 0
            17 September 2015 08: 22
            Wedmak. I got cons on the drum. It's a shame for the state.
            Quote: Wedmak
            But I would like to ask a question: from whom did this compressor grow to compress Russia to the size of Siberia

            Good question. But I also have an answer to this question. That is, I will not answer, but Zhirik.
            I don’t remember at what minute he said it. If you want, to understand this you will have to look through everything.
            By the way, here is the prediction of the influx of the Muslim world into Europe.
            For what? I won’t tell you. Everyone, to the best of my understanding, should comprehend this. I don’t put minuses, on the contrary, plus, out of respect for the other person, even if I disagree.
            1. +2
              17 September 2015 08: 48
              February 2011. Since then, the situation has changed a little. Now the color revolution will not pass. And will not pass in the next couple of years. There is no need to talk about a military invasion at all.
              1. 0
                17 September 2015 09: 09
                Quote: Wedmak
                Now the color revolution will not pass

                Denis, and here we are not talking about the color revolution.
                Here is a way to scare the Jews that they would gather in Russia, the safest place for them. No, I understand that this is only a version. But it is vital. Moreover, it’s worked out when creating the state of Israel.
                1. +2
                  17 September 2015 09: 33
                  Here is a way to scare the Jews that they would gather in Russia, the safest place for them.

                  I generally said. And about the Jews, that's what you want to think, but I have one opinion about this nation - where it is good, they run there. Moreover, they closely monitor only the benefit for themselves, leaving partners at a time when there is no longer any benefit. So it will be good with the United States, they will be "friends" with them, it will be good with Russia, they will come here.
                  With the support of the USSR, an entire state was allocated to them. To the detriment of other nations, and they wanted to spit on the USSR. So nafig-nafig they are needed here, let them understand at home.
                  That's the whole deal.
                  1. 0
                    17 September 2015 09: 55
                    Denis is so hard to figure out without looking at the parsed object.
                    I just remembered this 2012 video after information about the influx of refugees from the east. It converges. I repeat this is only the version.
                    According to Zhirik (you are too lazy to look at everything) it is planned to populate the European part of Russia with Jews (intimidating them with Muslim danger).
                    That's why my first koment appeared.
                    1. +1
                      17 September 2015 10: 02
                      you are too lazy to view all

                      Yes, laziness. Because this, as you said, is a theory. Zhirinovsky speaks a lot, sometimes essentially, sometimes even guesses the future.
                      1. 0
                        17 September 2015 10: 14
                        Quote: Wedmak
                        Yes laziness

                        Not theory. Option. And no one will provide you the truth on a silver platter.
                        I’m leaving. It was nice to talk. hi
      2. +1
        17 September 2015 07: 55
        1. Areas of deployment of nuclear submarines of potential partners. It is doubtful - BB is excessively accurate.

        Why not? The submarine moves, during the flight of the ICBM it may well escape from under the blow to a distance that ensures survival.
        The other options are, as it were, of course, but Yars is also a new device, and in which case the friendship will end quickly.
      3. +2
        17 September 2015 07: 57
        looked at "vika" vorogi write 11000 km range, it seems to be normal
      4. +1
        17 September 2015 08: 38
        Even at 6000 km to Alaska and Canada, as well as Japan, it does. It also doesn’t need to be discounted by China. They didn’t even think about sawing their medium-range missiles.
      5. +1
        17 September 2015 13: 52
        I think our specialists have long taken care of this (warhead power). And there is every warhead of reasonable power. But with the corresponding bells and whistles of missile defense, and in this case, the basing of the RS 26 in the eastern part of the Russian Federation is very logical.
  6. +2
    17 September 2015 07: 51
    I’m interested in something else: Yars was first launched in 2007, that is, this is a very new technique, which, incidentally, is not in some places equipped with Topol. Yars actually has a separable warhead, according to some sources up to 4 blocks, according to others even more. Maximum range to 11000 km.
    And now the question: what niche does the new RS-26 "Rubezh" occupy? Here they write that the complex is somewhat lighter and has new combat equipment, and in the wiki that the range will be preserved.
    Logic suggests that this is either a medium and long range complex with maneuvering warheads, or one of three. Either Yars was not able to carry new hypersonic atmospheric warheads (a quasi-ballistic trajectory), or they decided to make ICBMs based on new materials and technologies of purely Russian production (the funds are not small, but nowhere to go?), Or some tricky version of Yars.
    1. 0
      17 September 2015 08: 17
      It's simple. If you recall the Pioneer, then the Rubezh will fly to the Clark airbase, or to Subic Bay in about eight minutes.
  7. 0
    17 September 2015 09: 22
    Quote: Sensatus
    And it was precisely because of the Boundary that barrels began to roll at us that Russia was violating the INF Treaty. It is interesting that they changed so hastily in the still completely new Yars that it caused such hysteria in the West?

    the hysteria was caused not by what was changed there, but by the fact that we let it go along the 2200 km internal highway, which they considered a test of the ballistic missile defense and a violation of the INF Treaty.

    Quote: kuz363
    Running in peacetime is unprofitable. It is necessary to provide intelligence, combat protection, protection from terrorists ... And as they say, they are also found from outer space. Can additionally use mock-ups of such installations to deceive tracking satellites? And hide them in underground tunnels in mountainous areas?

    Do not believe everything they write. Technically, it is possible to detect APU, in reality - 1 chance in 1000. Moreover, APU never "go" alone, therefore there is reconnaissance and security. And underground tunnels in mountainous areas are, sorry, nonsense. They are not based in mountainous areas

    Quote: Ruswolf
    But interesting is the Irkutsk Strategic Rocket Forces Division where is based on Cuba or Argentina?

    On Jupiter ...

    Quote: biznaw
    This is the problem that they run a little, stand in debt in hangars and the whole idea of ​​running away is reduced to zero.

    And who told you that?

    Quote: Moore
    The best question for discussion, because it is not entirely clear where the "Rubezh" can fly with a range of 6 thousand km from Irkutsk

    And where did you get the idea that he has a range of 6000 km?

    Quote: Moore

    There are several options: 1. Areas of deployment of nuclear submarines of potential partners. It is doubtful - BB is excessively accurate.

    Of course, nonsense, never MBO ICBM was used to defeat the enemy nuclear submarines

    Quote: Moore
    2. Just in case. The case is the aggravation of "friendship" with all sorts of dragons.

    And if they deploy "between Leningrad and Moscow," then who are they against?

    Quote: Moore
    3. For a while, to shut up in the vastness of Siberia.

    And where will you show them to "sworn friends"? Somewhere in the open spaces of Siberia or at the PPD?
    1. 0
      17 September 2015 11: 06
      Quote: Old26

      Do not believe everything they write. Technically, it is possible to detect APU, in reality - 1 chance in 1000. Moreover, APU never "walk" alone, so there is reconnaissance and security.

      Everything is not necessary, believe half. APU is detected quite easily, knowing the general area of ​​combat patrol. When superimposing information from optoelectronic and radio engineering satellites, the detection period of AAP at the position is 1-2 days. It is known to any fifth-year Strategic Rocket Forces.
      Quote: Old26

      And where did you get the idea that he has a range of 6000 km?

      Sinful, sometimes I read open sources. But you apparently have information directly from Vlasikha?
      Quote: Old26
      Of course, it’s nonsense, never before was an ICBM used to defeat an enemy nuclear submarine.

      Do not rush to call nonsense what does not seem obvious. If you have ever come across the so-called. "Book 1" and you read it carefully - you would not use the word "nonsense".
      Quote: Old26
      And if they deploy "between Leningrad and Moscow," then who are they against?

      Try to guess for yourself.
      Quote: Old26
      And where will you show them to "sworn friends"? Somewhere in the open spaces of Siberia or at the PPD?

      I repeat: to bring you closer to the goals in the THREATENED period. What agreements will then be in effect, I do not know, I am not Lavrov. If PPD is located in the "open spaces of Siberia", then according to the protocol, of course, in them, in open spaces.
      1. 0
        17 September 2015 11: 28
        Quote: Moore
        Everything is not necessary, believe half. APU is detected quite easily, knowing the general area of ​​combat patrol. When superimposing information from optoelectronic and radio engineering satellites, the detection period of AAP at the position is 1-2 days. It is known to any fifth-year Strategic Rocket Forces.

        I’ve wanted to find out all my life, but how much will the flight mission be calculated?
      2. 0
        17 September 2015 11: 34
        When superimposing information from optoelectronic and radio engineering satellites, the detection period for APUs at the position is 1-2 days

        So the APU is moving, dreaming about a few hours, what good will this data be?
  8. 0
    17 September 2015 09: 26
    As I understand it, the rocket is ready for the BZHRK.
    1. +1
      17 September 2015 09: 35
      For BZHRK another missile like. There are lotions for starting.
  9. The comment was deleted.
  10. +1
    17 September 2015 12: 35
    Quote: Seryoga DV
    looked at "vika" vorogi write 11000 km range, it seems to be normal


    The distance from Irkutsk to Washington is 9800 km, i.e. all America flies. Tyrnet at the request issued. Maybe across the pole even closer.
  11. 0
    17 September 2015 13: 19
    Good plans for 2016. Here's another for this year "As a measure of savings, the Ministry of Finance proposes an increase in the retirement age already from 2016. The savings from this are from 620 billion to 1,3 trillion rubles. In three years, depending on the rate of increase: 6 months or 1 year a year, up to 65 years for men and women. "
  12. 0
    17 September 2015 14: 12
    Quote: dfg
    But if a platform were installed on the Kamaz chassis, then in general a glimpse would
    If only this chassis existed in nature. But so far, apart from "pictures on posters" there is nothing.

    Quote: Moore
    Everything is not necessary, believe half. APU is detected quite easily, knowing the general area of ​​combat patrol. When superimposing information from optoelectronic and radio engineering satellites, the detection period of AAP at the position is 1-2 days. It is known to any fifth-year Strategic Rocket Forces.

    The topic is certainly interesting, Andrei, but as you know, there is a specificity.
    1. The number of satellites of our "sworn friends" capable of detecting such AAP, that is, with a sufficiently high resolution. And their number is very, very small (fortunately for us). "Wells" EMNIP of about 4, radar reconnaissance of those in general 2, more RTR satellites. But in any case, the troops have documents related to the satellite situation. In addition, the "Wells" fly in pairs, that is, the OER satellites and reconnaissance radar satellites are able to inspect the same area twice a day. In the survey reconnaissance mode, the swath width is about 160 km, but the resolution is insufficient for 100% identification of the object. In detail mode, the resolution is much higher, but the "frame" is 2x2 km. So, not everything is clear.

    Quote: Moore
    Sinful, sometimes I read open sources. But you, apparently, have information directly from Vlasikha

    What are you, what are you. From Solomonov himself laughing
    But seriously, in all open materials the new complex is positioned as a further development of Yars, modified, with a new BO, but nevertheless, created on its basis. Moreover, for the last six months the "name" "Rubezh" has been used extremely rarely, and "Vanguard" is practically not used at all. But the designations "Yars-M" and "Yars-S" are increasingly common. I understand that we can give two different complexes the same name, it's easy ... laughing But in any case, even the altered third stage and warhead will not reduce by 5000 km ...
  13. 0
    17 September 2015 14: 12
    Quote: Moore
    If you have ever come across the so-called. "Book 1" and you read it carefully - you would not use the word "nonsense".

    I confess I have not read Book 1. Most of my life in the "trades". I am just perfectly aware that the anti-ballistic missile defense system is still designed to engage stationary, not mobile targets. And the nuclear submarine is not just a mobile target, but it is extremely difficult to detect it from a satellite. In addition, the reaction time of ICBMs will not allow the use of BB ICBMs against
    Premier League

    Quote: Moore
    I repeat: to bring you closer to the goals in the THREATENED period. What agreements will then be in effect, I do not know, I am not Lavrov. If PPD is located in the "open spaces of Siberia", then according to the protocol, of course, in them, in open spaces.

    Closer, how's that? Even during the Soviet era, an attempt to place the Pioneers' PR in the Anadyr region was unsuccessful. "And the distances in Siberia are such that driving the APU" closer to the enemy "is more expensive

    Quote: bmv04636
    As I understand it, the rocket is ready for the BZHRK.

    And not nearly ready. There wasn’t even a BI