NATO Secretary General: We see no immediate danger from Russia for the countries of the alliance

24
NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said in an interview with the Slovak newspaper Pravda that the Russian Federation does not pose a threat to the member countries of the alliance, as they have been provided with reliable security guarantees.



“We do not see any immediate danger (from Russia) relating to any of the NATO countries. The Alliance provides Member States with reliable deterrents. This is one of the reasons (security block). That is why NATO exists. As long as such reliable deterrent mechanisms as nowadays remain, the credibility that someone will attack the NATO country is very small, ”the newspaper quoted him as saying. "Sight".

Stoltenberg did not add Russia to the list of enemies of the West, noting that its role is “very difficult for us to try to attribute it to friends or opponents.”

“We are witnessing a changing security field (in the world). NATO must adapt to this situation. This is what we are doing - we invest more in defense, increase the combat readiness of our forces and strengthen the alliance’s eastern wing, ”he added, stressing that strengthening the organization’s eastern wing provides for“ protecting the airspace, conducting more exercises ”.

In addition, the NATO Secretary General supported cooperation with Russia.

“We are trying to develop constructive relations with Russia. I believe that there is no contradiction between a strong defense and the desire for political dialogue, ”he noted.

According to Stoltenberg, the Russian-NATO dialogue "is being conducted in various formats."

“In NATO, we are negotiating with Russian diplomats. Many times I met with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov. In the alliance, we have decided to stop practical cooperation with Russia, but leave open channels for political dialogue. In addition, many NATO member states maintain communications at various levels with Moscow, ”he noted.

Also, NATO Secretary General noted the cooperation with France and Germany in the "Norman format" for the peaceful settlement of the conflict in the Donbas.

“Russia was also a party to the negotiation process that led to an agreement on the Iranian nuclear program. It is included in the process of finding a political solution to the conflict in Syria. He is negotiating with the United States and other member states of the alliance, ”he stressed.
24 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    14 September 2015 11: 06
    Quote:
    “We do not see any immediate danger (from Russia) concerning any of the NATO countries. Alliance provides States–reliable deterrent to members. This is one of the reasons (block safety). That is why NATO exists. While will remain such reliable deterrence mechanisms as today, the likelihood that someone will attack the country of NATO is very small, "

    So he did not intrusively advertise his NATU ... Who are they intimidating? Russia? Skewers, Russia, their horror story on an elephant trunk! Potential partners? This is the whole west - intimidation!
    1. +3
      14 September 2015 11: 09
      With the entry of Latvia into the NATO bloc, the alliance strengthened due to:
      1) Latvian Navy Raft
      2) The Latvian Air Force Kite.
    2. +4
      14 September 2015 11: 11
      Why so, comrades? After all, we bear a clear threat to the Great Baltic and strategic reserves of sprat!
      1. +1
        14 September 2015 11: 21
        They see no danger, but the last cuttings from shovels have already been sawn into the exercises! laughing
      2. +6
        14 September 2015 11: 24
        They see, then they don’t see .... you gentlemen are determined there .. And then some kind of kindergarten! Well, with Poroshenko, everything is clear there ... bully Russia wants you to leave us alone .. Washington is not going to take it yet .. yet! But your inadequate behavior is alarming us ... Soldiers are nervous! You finally decide! hi
      3. Arh
        +1
        14 September 2015 11: 27
        NATO members would be scared to scare everyone but be frightened by themselves))))) !!!
        1. +8
          14 September 2015 11: 55
          Quote: Arh
          NATO members would be scared to scare everyone but be frightened by themselves))))) !!!
      4. +1
        14 September 2015 11: 47
        Quote: vodolaz
        Why so, comrades? After all, we bear a clear threat to the Great Baltic and strategic reserves of sprat!


        What time, from the Baltic side, groans and lamentations will be heard, like, but what about the fence that we started to build from Russia? Again, the Balteks licked and spent in vain, geezy! wassat
    3. +2
      14 September 2015 11: 24
      The fact is that NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg is undoubtedly an official person, but, in a way, is Vice Chairman Pound! Therefore, he can say anything, only it has nothing to do with reality! You need to listen to what the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff of the United States and members of the committee say! All statements from this body come down to one formula:"Russia poses the greatest threat to US security!"
      And this is what we need to build upon from our National Security Strategy!
    4. +1
      14 September 2015 12: 13
      "not a threat" since when? Before that there was a threat, so again they surrendered something, Syria? New Russia? have you shared the deposits? lands? we will find out soon ...
  2. +3
    14 September 2015 11: 06
    Oh, how they started singing. It was worth drowning in the stream of refugees from the East and approaching the line of extinction of Europe. Now again I wanted to establish relations with Russia. He thinks he will be able to redirect the crowds of refugees to Russia. Well, the pipes laughing
  3. 0
    14 September 2015 11: 06
    At least one common thought in the minds of NATO
    1. +1
      14 September 2015 11: 22
      This is not a thought. This is a phrase. And she is far from always connected with thought.
  4. +7
    14 September 2015 11: 06
    Something they have in the NATO there is some kind of game of chamomile, then Russia poses a threat or does not represent. You would have already identified you are inconstant ours.
  5. +3
    14 September 2015 11: 09
    Seven Fridays in a week.
  6. +2
    14 September 2015 11: 09
    I believe that this danger has never happened.
    Only now, they are strongly pressed, to such an extent that it has become more profitable to ally with us than confrontation.
    This has happened more than once ...
  7. 0
    14 September 2015 11: 09
    What kind of "reliable deterrent" they have?
    -Who is this ?
    -En elusive Joe.
    -And why is the elusive?
    -Because nafig nobody needs.
    So we don’t need NATO, but cheeks are inflating that your toad is in a swamp.
  8. 0
    14 September 2015 11: 12
    It’s disingenuous, it’s immediately obvious otherwise, after the collapse of the alliance, they would have canceled NATO, since there is no more enemy, and as long as there is a big Russia, these possessed ones will not calm down.
  9. 0
    14 September 2015 11: 13
    But what about the worried Baltic invasion, and Scandinavia. Or they went to hell.
  10. +1
    14 September 2015 11: 16
    Theater of the absurd, first enemy number one. Now, when migrants remake Europe, Russia does not pose a threat. You NATO comrades will sort things out with your own head or switch to normal cigarettes.
  11. 0
    14 September 2015 11: 16
    “We are witnessing a changing field of security (in the world). NATO must adapt to this situation. This is what we are doing - we invest more in defense, increase the combat readiness of our forces and strengthen the eastern wing of the alliance ”

    Another mantra on the topic - "Give me money, the US military-industrial complex is starving and expenses in the NATO apparatus have grown." Nothing new worthy of attention. Hence, we must wait for an increase in the activity of NATO troops in the border areas. In this situation, we need to activate visual and electronic control over the events taking place. In active actions, at times, information leaks, the "behavioral misunderstandings" of a potential adversary become clear. As the saying goes, "let him who has eyes see." GRU is hopefully awake.
  12. +3
    14 September 2015 11: 18
    How then to explain this ?! NATO places missile defense systems near Russia. NATO's military infrastructure is approaching our borders, and not vice versa. Some hypocrisy! (Although Russia has never been aggressive towards NATO and has always been looking for contacts for joint interaction).
  13. +4
    14 September 2015 11: 21
    He’s lying. As always.
  14. +1
    14 September 2015 11: 30
    Quote: Finches
    The fact of the matter is that NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg is an official person, but it is in some way, Vice Chairman Pound! Therefore, he can say anything, only it has nothing to do with reality! You need to listen to what the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff of the United States and its members says! All statements from this body come down to one formula:"Russia poses the greatest threat to US security!"
    And this is what we need to build upon from our National Security Strategy!

    I agree! better to overtake! am
  15. +1
    14 September 2015 11: 46
    This means only one thing - soon they will want to drag us into some kind of adventure under the guise of a "partner" where they themselves cannot cope and want to drag chestnuts out of the fire with our hands. Just something like that and nothing else.
  16. +1
    14 September 2015 11: 53
    Perhaps my comparisons are not entirely correct. But. If the voluntary annexation of Crimea by NATO is declared an "Anschluss", then the inclusion of new countries in the NATO bloc by changing the governments of these countries and initiating a "voluntary" accession to the military bloc is fully consistent with the term "Anschluss". Based on this, we can conclude that the NATO military bloc through the Anschluss has occupied practically all of Eastern Europe over the past 20 years.
  17. 0
    14 September 2015 11: 56
    Are we witnessing the coming insight?
  18. +2
    14 September 2015 12: 11
    To raise morale ...! But I think Kulibins are our inventors even those ...
  19. The comment was deleted.
  20. 0
    14 September 2015 12: 21
    Alliance Provides Member States with Reliable Intimidation


    Are these fat-assed homo-paratroopers who beat the muzzles of the natives, get drunk in bars and are generally disgraceful in every way?
  21. 0
    14 September 2015 12: 50
    Alliance Provides Member States with Reliable Intimidation

    That's for sure. And this means one word - Russia. After providing this remedy, the Baltic states, and now the Scandinavians, begin an attack of hysteria. What makes the alliance great.
  22. 0
    14 September 2015 12: 53
    Stoltenberg did not include Russia in the list of enemies of the West, noting that her role was “very difficult for us to try to attribute her to friends or opponents”


    Just now, on "last week" we were the aggressors, so you will decide dear ......!?
  23. +1
    14 September 2015 13: 52
    everything happens for the first time!
  24. 0
    14 September 2015 14: 24
    They now have enough of their problems. Not to Russia. Until...
  25. 0
    14 September 2015 14: 40
    They themselves do not know what they want ....
  26. 0
    15 September 2015 17: 59
    And why should he determine his, like a billiard table, in all the holes you can, it all depends on who plays it at the moment