Glazyev will present to the Security Council of the Russian Federation a large-scale "roadmap" of Russia's economic sovereignty

85
Glazyev will present to the Security Council of the Russian Federation a large-scale "roadmap" of Russia's economic sovereigntyPresidential Advisor Sergey Glazyev, September 15, must submit to the interdepartmental commission of the Security Council of the Russian Federation a report on additional measures to overcome economic sanctions against the Russian Federation. The draft report, which I got acquainted with “Kommersant”, has recipes that will satisfy the most ardent supporter of the economic sovereignty of the Russian Federation: from allowing companies not to pay their debts to creditors from hostile countries until VAT returns on commodity exports.

As it became known to Kommersant, 15 of September, an interdepartmental commission of the Security Council of the Russian Federation on security in the economic and social sphere, will hear the report of presidential adviser Sergey Glazyev on the issue “On additional measures to neutralize threats to the economic security of the Russian Federation in the context of international sanctions”.

The commission, represented by deputy ministers and heads of relevant government agencies, has been a division of the Security Council that is preparing proposals for this advisory body by order of Vladimir Putin since February 2009.

To date, the text is the most holistic program report of supporters of a “modernization spurt” of a mobilization type from circles close to the Department of Social Sciences of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

The objective of the document is to present, “in addition to the measures taken by the government” to ensure 5-percent GDP growth, a program of government actions to increase the long-term competitiveness of the Russian economy.

However, the real problems that Sergei Glazyev proposes are much wider.

This is an increase in industrial output on 30 – 35%, an increase in the share of the “knowledge economy” of the share in GDP of expenditures on education, health care and social policy from 6,5% to about 40% (figures from the original source), increasing the “accumulation rate” GDP) "to 35 – 45%.

The program, Sergei Glazyev warns, should be implemented over the next five years, that is, before 2020. This is the only way to avoid a “stagflational trap”, threats to “economic security” and “external control over management infrastructure”, to avoid the fate of the global “periphery” oppressed by “nonequivalent exchange” - and enter the new “core of the world economic system” against the will of countries the current "core".

The work continues to develop in the 80 – 90 years of the 20th century the work of Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences Dmitry Lvov (died in 2007 year) within the framework of the non-Sumperean theory of “changing technological patterns” outside of the scientific circles of the USSR had no development. The work of Mr. Glazyev contains a number of original additions in the social democratic spirit.

So, with reference to the 2009 nobelis of the year, Elinor Ostrem and Oliver Williamson (collective rights management work) proposed to stimulate the creation of “people's enterprises” in the Russian Federation (up to 10% of the total number in the economy) and organizing in other sectors “councils of workers, scientific engineering councils, governing councils "along with the owners. This makes it a project with the development of "accelerating the scientific and technological progress of the USSR" in 80-x.
Of greater interest are the proposals of Sergei Glazyev, focused on the current political situation associated with the sanctions against the Russian Federation. Passing along the “chain” of the Security Council of the Russian Federation, separate initiatives (as was previously the case with information and food security topics) may become the subject of instructions of the president - despite the fact that the general logic of Glazyev with the ideology of the government of Dmitry Medvedev and the management of the Bank of Russia are incompatible.

The ideas of Sergei Glazyev are divided into six blocks. The first is the “Transition to Sovereign Monetary Policy” (DCT). These ideas imply open manipulation (“system management”) of monetary policy in all respects, from rates to the currency position of the banking system.

Thus, the program involves refinancing of the Central Bank at the rate of 2% of “targeted” industry credits for one to five years for at least 3 trillion rubles. (the final rate for companies is 4%), loans for 1% per annum to development institutions - at least 2 trillion rubles, refinancing of the Central Bank through VEB companies and banks - at 5 trillion rubles. and under the state program of import substitution - at least 3 trillion rubles.

In general, the emission program of the proposals is 20 trillion rubles. for five years. At the same time, Sergei Glazyev puts forward a rather unusual idea of ​​supporting private companies: their state support is carried out with “counter obligations to the state to produce products (or provide services) to a certain extent within certain periods at certain prices. Otherwise, private companies are charged with a debt to the state “in the amount of the value of non-produced goods” (the further fate of this debt is not discussed in a report).

The section “Stabilization of the ruble exchange rate, cessation of capital flight, dedollarization of the economy” contains a set of measures to “stop the speculative whirlwind” on the foreign exchange market. De facto, this is a proposal of hard currency control (“a ban on the purchase of currency by legal entities without a reason for making payment transactions”) with a number of innovations. Thus, it is assumed “temporary tax (reservation of funds)” for conversion operations and cross-border payments. Mr. Glazyev also proposes not only the “introduction of the mandatory sale of foreign exchange earnings”, but also the “legislative prohibition of loans to non-financial organizations” in currency in principle. Another idea is the “introduction of control over cross-border capital operations through open licensing”, as well as the requirement of a “reasoned rationale” for the export of capital from the position of its “benefit” for the Russian economy.

The section “Stabilization of prices” (obviously, necessary after the implementation of the previous two) requires, first of all, “temporary freezing of prices for goods of daily consumer demand”; establishing a marginal “margin of the trading system” 25% between the “producer price” and the retail price; rights for the FAS in case of price fluctuation “to abruptly return it to the previous level” (apparently, by administrative orders). Mr. Glazyev also proposes to abandon the annual indexation of tariffs of state monopolies with their “medium-term fixation”. A separate subsection is the "rationalization of the power industry" with the "elimination of the negative consequences of the reform of RAO UES". In this block, it’s interesting not so much the expected proposals for rolling back reforms in the industry (returning powers to the Energy Ministry, merging the commercial and technological system operator, “integrated schemes” for the development of housing and public utilities and energy in the regions), but also “rationing profitability in the economy sectors” supplying state infrastructure monopolies .

These ideas are attacking for the most part the construction groups and the management of Gazprom, Transneft, Russian Railways, and Rossety. But there are proposals that will interest all the largest Russian companies. This is the “restoration” of export duties on metals and chemical products and the “termination of VAT refunds on the export of hydrocarbons”, as well as other raw materials - to “encourage its deep processing”.

“Neutralization of anti-Russian sanctions” - the next section of the proposals is interesting, first of all, with the idea of ​​allowing companies to declare force majeure on “against loans provided by countries that have imposed financial sanctions against the Russian Federation” - in fact, this is approximately equal to the legalization of non-repayment of all private foreign debt . The reserves of the Central Bank, the Reserve Fund and the National Wealth Fund Sergey Glazyev recommends converting into gold and “obligations of the BRICS countries”, which should create a “system of international banking settlements, independent of the pressure of NATO countries and replacing (complementary) SWIFT” and Cards "compatible with China UnionPay. A new idea of ​​de-offshore is the termination of double taxation agreements with Cyprus and Luxembourg, the 30-percentage tax "on all operations" with "not cooperating" offshore jurisdictions with the Russian Federation.

Finally, a number of “strategic” and “socially significant” enterprises Sergey Glazyev recommends “not allowing” the transfer into the hands of foreigners in principle: when they are bankrupt (which in some cases with the applied policy looks very likely), an adviser to the president will be based on them and proposes to organize the above described "People's enterprises". The block of initiatives on “Harmonization of interests of business entities” reveals this topic a bit more fully with reference to the “positive experience” gained in this area in the Lipetsk region.

Crowned this coherent system chapter "Deploying a system of strategic management." This is the creation of the State Strategic Planning Committee under the President of the Russian Federation (GKSP) with the “coordination” subordination of the de facto government and the State Committee for Scientific and Technological Development of the Russian Federation (GKNTR) under the head of state, but inside the White House. The last two structures repeat the design of Iranian government agencies, which were created after 1994 for an attempt to overcome the US and EU sanctions. In this case, obviously, there is a pure coincidence.
85 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +26
    9 September 2015 06: 35
    "Komersant" somehow slightly negatively quotes Glazyev. Condescendingly or something (like nonsense). All sentences are in quotation marks.
    Sergey Glazyev recommends "to not allow" transfer into the hands of foreigners in principle
    Although the proposals are sound.
    1. +42
      9 September 2015 08: 26
      It’s one thing to take note of the report or even launch it for implementation, but who will do all this? It would be nice if Glazyev was appointed prime minister and would give him the opportunity to recruit his team. The only intelligible anti-crisis program for a year and a half, but it can be poached by liberals. An attempt on margin is deadly for them. It would be good to launch this program for wide discussion, until Monday there is still time.
      1. zzz
        zzz
        +8
        9 September 2015 09: 14
        Quote: siberalt
        It would be nice if Glazyev was appointed prime minister and would give him the opportunity to recruit his team. The only intelligible anti-crisis program in a year and a half, but it can be poached by liberals.


        Absolutely in solidarity with you. I post the link where economist Zhukovsky is visiting Popov at 23:23. It is very interesting, as it explains this roadmap, and much more. Look, you will not regret it. http://tv-news-online.com/vesti-v-00-08-s-evgeniem-popovyim-09-2015-XNUMX/
        1. zzz
          zzz
          +2
          9 September 2015 09: 22
          Watch from 44 minutes!
          Quote: zzz
          Посмотрите,не пожалеете. http://tv-news-online.com/vesti-v-23-00-s-evgeniem-popovyim-08-09-2015/
      2. 0
        9 September 2015 19: 32
        Quote: siberalt
        It would be nice if Glazyev was appointed prime minister and would give him the opportunity to recruit his team. The only intelligible anti-crisis program in a year and a half, but it can be poached by liberals.

        Dmitry Peskov commented on these statements by Glazyev. You have to understand that this is Putin's answer, which was given publicly. Peskov said that Glazyev's opinion is an expert one and does not reflect the official position of the president: “... He is an economist and sometimes comes from the academic background and expresses an expert point of view on certain points. And this point of view is not always an expression of the official position of the president or the presidential administration ... "

        In other words, Glazyev was told that he can express his opinion, but when he needs to listen to his advice, he will be called.
        In the meantime, Putin is quite happy with everything that’s happening, and he doesn’t need all kinds of highbrow advice - he has an absolutely competent person on his government, and the Central Bank is run by an equally professional specialist. All ministers sit tight and carry out what is entrusted to them.
      3. +2
        9 September 2015 22: 16
        A wide discussion is already there and will be, and much can be considered. The main thing that I liked was an independent monetary policy. As if I did not expect the dollar at 68 kopecks, but we have a lot of things besides oil, and I consider the dollar to be only based on its value, and as a result of the arrival of green candy wrappers in the country. Although we have a lot of our own which is not there, unfortunately ...
    2. +12
      9 September 2015 09: 16
      The proposals are healthy, but only the liberal government does not need them. The Central Bank and the government look into the mouth of sharks from the IMF
      1. +1
        9 September 2015 09: 53
        I post the link where economist Zhukovsky is visiting Popov at 23:23. It is very interesting, as it explains this roadmap, and much more. Look, you will not regret it. http://tv-news-online.com/vesti-v-00-08-s-evgeniem-popovyim-09-2015-XNUMX/
        Thank you.
      2. 0
        9 September 2015 19: 51
        Does the government need this? Power and do not steal, with bread and without bread, without kickbacks, without corruption. On TV I heard the Kremlin did not subscribe to this.
      3. DPN
        0
        9 September 2015 21: 01
        Maybe not sharks, and PUTIN?
    3. +6
      9 September 2015 10: 27
      Quote: Ingvar 72
      Sergei Glazyev recommends “not allowing” the transfer into the hands of foreigners, in principle, although the proposals are sound.

      Although the proposals may be sound, no one will listen to Glazyev. He was taken only in order to dilute the faces that are boring to everyone and so that at least sometimes a different point of view appears. The share of foreign capital by industry, gray 2010, red- In 2014, it will increase even more. The reason is the financial crisis. The stakes in state-owned companies will go to foreigners, China in particular. Rosneft has already begun to dump. You can increase it.
    4. +9
      9 September 2015 14: 08
      Ingvar 72 (3) RU Today, 06:35
      "Komersant" somehow slightly negatively quotes Glazyev. Condescendingly or something (like nonsense). All sentences are in quotation marks.
      Although the proposals are sound.

      Glazyev’s patriotic ideas about STATE CAPITALISM AND SOCIALLY RESPONSIBLE AUTHORITIES do not fit in any way WITH THE IDEAS OF THE CONSOLIDATED MARKET OF NEO-CONSERVATORS THE REPRESENTATIVES WHICH WORK IN Kommersant magazine. Hence the malice!
      They would have acted even sharper if Glazyev did not represent the COMMISSION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION. And there, from the supporters of the liberals, only Medvedev, Siluanov, and the Chairman of the National Bank ... Gryzlov is a weather vane ... he is no longer a liberal ... The rest are statesmen. And from here the conclusion-- THE REPORT MUST BE SUPPORTED BY MEMBERS OF THE SECURITY COUNCIL!
      And if the report is adopted as the basis for the doctrine of economic security, then very many of those in power will have to leave their posts. I won’t say for Chubais (nevertheless, he put the GDP into power at the first stage of his career ... and this is not forgotten!) ... But for the chair and the Prime Minister ... and the Head of the National Bank, some ministers of the economic block - I’m sure they will For others!
      God grant! Maybe even then we will sail out of this swamp of uncontrolled wild capitalism ... and we will develop in a civilized way!
    5. +1
      9 September 2015 14: 24
      He is like Don Quixote against the mill with his proposals, they are not feasible until 2020, there are no structures listed in the program, there are no personnel for these structures, it is generally a rejection of the market economy in large business, after which all credit lines of this business will be closed with money they will take from the state and constantly blackmail the state with their closure and mass dismissal so as not to pay a loan, and the state will feed them endless loans and will not have money for anything else.
      1. +1
        9 September 2015 23: 25
        and now the banks are doing the same thing. Companies at least produce something ...
      2. 0
        10 September 2015 06: 24
        Quote: Kyrgyz
        constantly blackmail the state with its closure and mass dismissal so as not to pay a loan, but the state will endless loans feed them and will not have money for anything else.

        I agree. Does anyone not recall the long-standing saga with AvtoVAZ? +
    6. +1
      9 September 2015 22: 12
      In fact, "Kommersant" is still a rag, with a liberal smell, you know ...
    7. 0
      10 September 2015 00: 26
      That's right. Now our government is playing their game and according to their rules, which they change as they are needed. So you can’t win.
  2. +10
    9 September 2015 06: 35
    Glazyev’s general logic with the ideology of the government of Dmitry Medvedev and the leadership of the Bank of Russia are incompatible.

    Nothing surprising. Glazyev, a peasant who is literate in this respect, thinks about the country and its population. Medvedev with the ministers of the financial and economic bloc "liberals" and their thoughts lie in the plane of the Western economy and often work for the West.
    1. +16
      9 September 2015 06: 47
      Quote: rotmistr60
      Medvedev with the ministers of the financial and economic bloc "liberals" and their thoughts lie in the plane of the Western economy and often work for the West.

      Strange, but Putin controls the country, appoints prime ministers including Medvedev. And judging from his words, he is pleased with the work of the government.
      That’s why there are two options, either you don’t know about the work of the government, or Putin is a liberal enemy of the people working for the interests of the West wassat
      1. +3
        9 September 2015 06: 50
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        or Putin is a liberal enemy of the people working for the interests of the West

        I will correct - he works for the interests of a group of "entrepreneurs" who, in reality, set the vector for the movement of politics.
        Hi Sanya! hi How is it in the Far East, the Chinese have already begun to populate the leased land? wink
        1. +1
          9 September 2015 07: 03
          Quote: Ingvar 72
          he works for the interests of a group of "entrepreneurs" who, in reality, set the vector for the movement of politics.

          what And I thought entrepreneurs set the vector for economic development, opening up new jobs, paying salaries and taxes. It turns out no, hmm, something new. Well, okay lol
          Quote: Ingvar 72
          How is it in the Far East, the Chinese have already begun to populate the leased land?

          Healthy hi Oh, from the Chinese people do not push, I walk along the Russian street with difficulty I find.
          Listen Igor, why are people smoking this in the west of the country that every day they are waiting for the invasion of the Chinese?
          1. +1
            9 September 2015 07: 51
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            Oh, from the Chinese I do not push, I walk along the Russian street with difficulty I find.

            And before our revolution in Manchuria, there was much more.
            Quote: Harbin
            The city, originally posad, was founded by Russians in 1898 year as a railway station of the Transmanchurian Railway, which is why the oldest areas of Harbin to this day are marked by the predominance of architecture typical of Siberia.
      2. +7
        9 September 2015 07: 53
        or you nichrome do not know about the work of the government,

        I judge the work of the government by the state of my standard of living. Well, and you obviously dohrena know about his (government) job. Share or all under the bar? And the question was asked provocatively, which often skips for you.
        1. 0
          9 September 2015 07: 56
          Quote: rotmistr60
          I judge the work of the government by the state of my standard of living.

          This is just some kind of holiday!
          I will not miss the opportunity to recall that today under Putin, people in Russia live as RICH as they never lived in the foreseeable past. Vivid evidence of this is the courtyards of Russian cities, clogged with cars, many of which were bought with overpayment on credit. This indicates that people have money to overpay and the lack of intelligence, so as not to overpay.
          And I will repeat it, as long as there are those who do not understand this.
          1. +1
            9 September 2015 08: 12
            Quote: VseDoFeNi
            I will not miss the opportunity to recall that today, under Putin, people in Russia live as RICH as they never lived in the foreseeable past

            To return the month to 1998 for a month, so that they would remember how it was.
            Quote: VseDoFeNi
            . This indicates that people have money to overpay and the lack of intelligence, so as not to overpay.

            +++++++
            1. 0
              9 September 2015 23: 17
              Quote: Alexander Romanov
              To return the month to 1998 for a month, so that they would remember how it was.


              Here it is interesting and exciting written about the crisis: http: //oppps.ru/kogda-eto-my-uspeli-stat-takimi-nezhnymi-ved-eshhe-sovsem
              -nedavno-xvastalis-svoej-koshachej-zhivuchestyu.html
          2. +7
            9 September 2015 08: 31
            Quote: VseDoFeNi

            I will not miss the opportunity to recall that today under Putin, people in Russia live as RICH as they never lived in the foreseeable past. Vivid evidence of this is the courtyards of Russian cities, clogged with cars, many of which were bought with overpayment on credit. This indicates that people have money to overpay and the lack of intelligence, so as not to overpay.
            And I will repeat it, as long as there are those who do not understand this.

            I’m tired of your phrase. hi
            1. 0
              9 September 2015 08: 38
              Quote: Mordvin 3
              I’m tired of your phrase.

              And hello to you. hi

              And I like it because it reflects the essence. bully
          3. +3
            9 September 2015 08: 40
            Quote: VseDoFeNi
            many of which are bought with overpayment on credit. This indicates that people have money to overpay

            On credit, this means there is no money from people and they attract borrowed funds.
            1. +1
              9 September 2015 08: 51
              Quote: rosarioagro
              On credit, this means there is no money from people and they attract borrowed funds.

              On credit, this means no brains if you buy with an overpayment !!! wink
              And there is money if these loans are repaid. good

              There the homeless people have no money, that is, not at all, will you give them a loan? fool
              1. 0
                9 September 2015 08: 55
                Quote: VseDoFeNi
                On credit, this means no brains if you buy with an overpayment !!!

                But what about the show-offs? :-)
                1. 0
                  9 September 2015 12: 56
                  Quote: rosarioagro
                  But what about the show-offs? :-)

                  This is a lack of mind.
          4. -6
            9 September 2015 10: 06
            all the way. You're right. A credit tractor and a radio in the 30s, a credit car and a credit home 70s in the last century - the ideal of the American. In this ideal, there is no medicine, no education, all this is already a luxury. So now we live even better than in the American dream, but much worse than we lived in the SOVIET UNION. But Glazyev is the same Chubais, only without Rockefeller support, and still dreaming of billions, so his statements are still like that. That will earn * authority *, will receive the support of the powerful American world, then it will cease to mimic under RUSSIAN, just like Chubais will become * a citizen of the world *.
            1. 0
              9 September 2015 15: 50
              This is what a fright? Glazyev, as it were, is not a Jew.
              So your fears are in vain.

              In addition, if you do not know, there is a huge number of RUSSIAN people (in this case, by "Russians" I mean the definition of Leo Tolstoy) who are more important than money, are recognition and gratitude from their compatriots living and future!
              1. +1
                9 September 2015 17: 56
                Quote: Volzhanin
                are recognition and gratitude from compatriots now living and future!

                And there are people who do things without demanding gratitude and recognition in return.
              2. 0
                10 September 2015 11: 52
                Volzhanin. I remember the ideas voiced by Glazyev about the privatization of the land and subsoil of RUSSIA, and with the attraction of foreign capital. The cunning ones are in every nation, as are the traitors.
            2. 0
              9 September 2015 17: 54
              Quote: Vasily50
              but much worse than they lived in the Soviet Union

              Worse than?
          5. The comment was deleted.
          6. 0
            9 September 2015 23: 12
            Quote: VseDoFeNi
            I will not miss the opportunity to recall that today under Putin, people in Russia live as RICH as they never lived in the foreseeable past. Vivid evidence of this is the courtyards of Russian cities, clogged with cars, many of which were bought with overpayment on credit. This indicates that people have money to overpay and the lack of intelligence, so as not to overpay.

            In the first seven months of the 2015 year, Russian residents spent a billion rubles on the purchase of new 984,4 cars. This is by 24% less than the amount allocated by the Russians for the purchase of cars last year. According to the Avtostat analytical site, over the past seven months the leader in terms of available profit was the German automobile concern Mercedes-Benz, whose total revenue exceeded 117 billion rubles. The Russians during this time period have purchased more than 25 thousand Mercedes cars. On average, the cost of each of the machines is 4,65 million rubles. The second place in terms of total revenue received from January to July of the 2015 of the year is occupied by the Toyota automobile concern, which received more than 109 billion rubles, while selling 56 thousand cars at an average price of 1,94 million rubles. The third position was assigned to Kia. Its result is equal to 78,7 billion rubles. Immediately after it follows the Hyundai (76 billion rubles). The domestic brand of Lada cars manufactured by AvtoVAZ OJSC is in fifth place in this list. According to the results of seven months of this year, the proceeds received by her amounted to almost 74 billion rubles. Compared to the same period of 2014, AvtoVAZ profit from the sale of Lada cars decreased by more than 16%. In 2015, the inhabitants of Russia purchased over 175 of thousands of such cars. At the same time, the average cost of cars amounted to about 468 thousand rubles. The top ten list compiled by Avtostat also includes such global automotive concerns as Nissan, BMW, Volkswagen, Audi and Renault. At the same time, among all the automakers included in the TOP-10, only Mercedes and BMW were able to increase their sales in Russia in relation to the same 2014 indicator of the year.
            Our News Newsroom Posted by: 02.09.2015 17: 31

            Source: https://versia.ru/rossiyane-s-nachala-goda-potratili-na-pokupku-mashin-pochti-tr
            illion-rublej
            1. 0
              10 September 2015 04: 00
              Quote: Captain45
              This is 24% less than the amount allocated by the Russians for the purchase of cars last year.

              And it is right!!! A car is a luxury! The same traffic jams are formed due to the fact that the cars that bought with a fool go to these cars in business and not in business. More often than not. But this is a religious question, those who have bought sacredly believe that this is correct. On the other hand, the problem of traffic jams does not exist. Instead of going by car, take public transport. It's obvious - 100 people got into 1 bus = 100 cars from the traffic jam ... It's simple.
              But it was a digression.
              If someone has not noticed or forgot, then I will remind you that now Russia is living in a war declared by the West and called "sanctions". In fact, this is an economic war.
              So, in war conditions, buying their products from the adversaries in the presence of their own, yes, VAZ is a very large automobile plant.

              One more moment - now continues, the world SYSTEM crisis that began in 2008-2009. And he will deepen. But I will ask you a question - what will you do with your cars if the price of gasoline rises to 100r per liter with today's salaries?
        2. +4
          9 September 2015 08: 09
          Quote: rotmistr60
          And the question was asked provocatively,

          Well, it’s understandable when you don’t know anything, immediately a provocation laughing
          Quote: rotmistr60
          which often skips for you.

          Often I read this, in which everyone doesn’t spit, knows what and how to do it. And at the same time Putin is doing the right thing, but the government is not wassat
          Quote: rotmistr60
          I judge the work of the government by the state of my standard of living.

          And the fact that against the country imposed sickly sanctions, so garbage.
          Quote: rotmistr60
          Well, and you obviously dohren know about his (government) work.

          I don’t know anything, just like you, and therefore I am surprised at comments like yours, although I have not been surprised at all lately.
          Read carefully-Tendem Putin-Medvedev
          We read again -Tendem Putin-Medvedev
          We read again -Tendem Putin-Medvedev
          Although the sucker is not a mammoth does not die out wink
          1. 0
            9 September 2015 08: 19
            I am also often surprised at your comments. But what wonder did you find in mine?
            Glazyev, a man who is literate in this respect, thinks about the country and its population. Medvedev with the ministers of the financial and economic bloc "liberals" and their thoughts lie in the plane of the Western economy and often work for the West.

            And about the sucker, we assume that you got excited.
          2. +1
            9 September 2015 11: 20
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            Read carefullyTendem Putin-Medvedev
            Read. Sanya, what are you, well, first class, it’s written TANDEM! laughing
            P.S. What about mammoths, you see, and they have not yet died in the Far East? wassat
      3. 0
        9 September 2015 08: 37
        Alexander Romanov
        That’s why there are two options, either you don’t know about the work of the government, or Putin is a liberal enemy of the people working for the interests of the West

        In fact, there is also a third option.
        It is this third option that actually exists.
        1 Putin is not an enemy of the people
        (otherwise I would have passed everything a long time ago).
        2 Putin does not act in the interests of the West
        (his actions are caused by other reasons).
        3 Putin is a liberal
        (considers liberalism mostly correct).
        1. 0
          9 September 2015 18: 00
          4 Putin is not as simple as a liberal. laughing
      4. 0
        9 September 2015 14: 28
        Alexander Romanov
        Quote: rotmistr60
        Medvedev with the ministers of the financial and economic bloc "liberals" and their thoughts lie in the plane of the Western economy and often work for the West.
        Strange, but Putin controls the country, appoints prime ministers including Medvedev. And judging from his words, he is pleased with the work of the government.
        Therefore, there are two options, either you do not know about the work of the government, or Putin is a liberal enemy of the people working for the interests of the West

        Reasonable remark. Just take into account the history of this issue. After the transition to the path of building a capitalist society, a STRATEGY was proclaimed - NO MONEY ... WE WILL DEVELOP AT THE BASIS OF WESTERN INVESTMENT! A WEST ASKED THE QUESTION IS SIMPLE - WE WILL GIVE MONEY ONLY IF THE GOVERNMENT WILL BE PEOPLE WHO WE TRUST! THEREFORE, AND THE FINANCIAL AND ECONOMIC BLOCK WAS ALWAYS A WESTERN ORIENTATION. And so they tried, gradually to limit their dependence on foreign money, to begin to develop their economy. SANCTIONS OF THE WEST have now shown the dangers of this course, and therefore have returned to the questions of the independence of our economy from Western investment ... It is in this vein that Putin’s steps to limit the export of capital ... a ban on attracting Western capital to public procurement and public procurement should be considered ... refusal from external borrowing and a number of other steps to move away from Western investment dependence ...
        Moscow was not built right away ... and we will leave this Western bondage ... and then those whose thoughts are in the plane of the economy of the West will simply go into oblivion .... the road is there for them ...
      5. DPN
        0
        9 September 2015 21: 09
        Medvedev is a rook or tour in a chess lexicon. Only this piece can castle with PUTIN. throwing it off is not in the interests of GDP.
  3. +3
    9 September 2015 06: 37
    It's time to listen to Academician Glazyev! Economic sovereignty is vital for us, but I strongly doubt that these ideas will be approved by the current elite of our state!
    1. +2
      9 September 2015 07: 54
      It is high time. Yes, they will not give adversaries from the government.
      1. +1
        9 September 2015 08: 01
        Quote: Amurets
        Yes, they will not give adversaries from the government.

        At first, the adversaries of tsarism didn’t give ... Once the Russian Empire did not become, and in the Civil War the people's bloodshed poured. More than ten million of our citizens burned in the crucible of the revolution.
        Then the adversaries from the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union and other shadow workers and corrupt officials began to interfere ... Two, the Soviet Union did not die and the people's blood fell in Chechnya and not only ....

        Look, in Ukraine, the adversary Yanukovych interfered ...
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. The comment was deleted.
  4. +5
    9 September 2015 06: 43
    In Russia, for twenty years they have been listening to Glazyev’s ideas, praising them ... but they haven’t accepted a single one
    to work! Maybe it's time to do something?
    1. +3
      9 September 2015 06: 44
      Quote: AlNikolaich
      praise them ... but never received a single
      to work

      How do you know that you have not accepted a single one? If all his ideas passed by his ears, he would no longer have been an adviser to the president.
      1. +4
        9 September 2015 06: 52
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        If all his ideas passed by his ears, he would no longer have been an adviser to the president.

        "Keep your friends close and your enemies even closer."
        1. +4
          9 September 2015 06: 54
          Quote: Ingvar 72
          "Keep your friends close and your enemies even closer."

          Oh yeah, Putin’s go. And therefore appoints enemies as ministers, prime ministers, bankers and watches how they destroy the country yes. Ahahahah, the clinic is a pancake wassat
          1. +3
            9 September 2015 07: 07
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            and therefore appoints enemies as ministers, prime ministers, bankers and watches how they destroy the country

            Kudrin was a minister, Illarionov was an adviser. Both are now great "friends" of Russia in general and Putin in particular. But they were removed from power, hence the poisonous drool.
            I believe that the economic bloc of the government (I hope that together with Dimsik) is gradually waiting for the fate of the above comrades.
            1. +3
              9 September 2015 07: 34
              Quote: inkass_98
              I believe that the economic bloc of the government (I hope that together with Dimsik) is gradually waiting for the fate of the above comrades.

              Here today there is an article from the Novoi newspaper, here it is clearly seen from comments that our people do not like to think. He believes in any mess, but manages to live happily ever after.
              That's why in our country there are many scammers of all stripes, because suckers are fucked what
              1. +2
                9 September 2015 07: 55
                Quote: Alexander Romanov
                that our people do not like to think. He believes in any mess, but manages to live happily ever after.
                That's why in our country there are many scammers of all stripes, because suckers are fucked

                Remarkable words of Henry Ford: " Thinking is the hardest job; that’s probably why so few are doing it. »
              2. +1
                9 September 2015 08: 00
                Because our people live according to Nekrasov's concept: “When the BARIN comes, the master will judge us.
                1. 0
                  9 September 2015 08: 05
                  Quote: Amurets
                  Because our people

                  Only ours? laughing
                2. +5
                  9 September 2015 08: 36
                  An interesting "twig", as if in passing, was launched by the respected "Alexander Romanov" - "... our people do not like to think" feel
                  It would be just right to be indignant at such generalizations, but - in part, and so, material on this topic can be dumped - there is enough for a "doctoral" one. That's right: someone has no time - work knocks down, someone just doesn't feel like it (Ilya Muromets lay on the stove for 33 years, and Emelya refused to get off at all ... wink ), someone is not given from birth - and this happens ... The thought process is directly related to the vital function of a person - search. Search - WHAT? what Yes, all: shelter, food, happiness, love, truth, the meaning of life, and more. Yes Seek, and ye will find!
                  Alexander Romanov:
                  That's why in our country there are many scammers of all stripes, because suckers dohren what

                  A strange conclusion (it also gives off social Darwinism ...). It turns out that society is divided into "suckers" and those who still turned on the head, and from those who turned on the head, those who went to "breed suckers" have already stood out? Okay, but where did those who included, who are not scammers go? Philosophizing on the sidelines? Or modestly close their eyes? Here it is - the moment of truth: it's time for everyone to make their MORAL choice - either you are a Jedi or a Sith. And the master will not judge us. In the Russian epic there is also such a saying: "Trust in God, but yourself - do not make a mistake!" hi
                  1. +2
                    9 September 2015 09: 03
                    .
                    Quote: RU-Officer
                    It turns out that society is divided into "suckers" and those who still turned on their heads,

                    Something like this, the buyer is the seller. The seller’s task is to crap you crap, and the buyer’s (sucker) task is to buy two crap and then sell both at a price half that they bought.
                    It was before the new year, when people bought three televisions, three vacuum cleaners, three pressure cookers. And then, after a couple of months, realizing that he did not need it, he began to advertise in the newspapers for the sale of all this, but much cheaper than bought it.
                    Sucker is not a mammoth !!!
                    Well, of course, ordinary human greed plays a role.

                    PS I won’t write about stupidity, it’s a lot in comments every day.
          2. 0
            9 September 2015 08: 58
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            .Ahahahah-the pancake clinic

            I'm talking about Glazyev, not about Medvedev. am
  5. 0
    9 September 2015 06: 44
    It all sounds very beautiful, but how it will be in practice and whether or not anyone will know at all ...
    Wait and see...
  6. +1
    9 September 2015 06: 48
    One hope is that the presidential adviser would not have announced this program in the media without Putin's consent. Maybe we will start economic reforms after all. Although the Chinese warn about the hardships of the "era of change", they really want to.
  7. +3
    9 September 2015 06: 53
    Roadmap (pearl of distraught officials inserting this stupid expression anywhere) - as I understand it, an eternal restructuring? Not road folklore, but real planning should be in everything. With the results. Did not manage - on the road. If this is what is meant by the roadmap, then I am for it!
  8. +3
    9 September 2015 07: 07
    Glazyev swung correctly - he does not waste his time on trifles, only "These ideas are attacked for the most part by construction groups and the management of Gazprom, Transneft, Russian Railways, Rosseti.", This can either just take his report "into consideration." , or perverted to discredit
    1. 0
      9 September 2015 07: 21
      So it will be perverted, discredited and everything will go to zero .. those who went to the commissions from the meeting and forgot, these are the realities of today
  9. +6
    9 September 2015 07: 34
    And I thought Glazyev was quiet. But he was preparing such a doctrine. Global. On all fronts - financial, export, production. I even got to state-owned companies, and a mess with energy decided the Chubais legacy.
    It is understandable why Kommersant comments so venomously. This newspaper is purely pro-Western. Most of her readers will not like such reforms.
  10. 0
    9 September 2015 07: 45
    If Glazyev is not heard, it will be a signal to the people - the government does not want to develop the country so that everyone is happy. This will mean that it is reasonably possible to go out to peaceful demonstrations and protests. It will be time to show the president how dissatisfied people are with liberal Western rule, where only banks and oligarchs live!
  11. 0
    9 September 2015 07: 53
    "Dmitry Peskov: The Kremlin does not support the idea of ​​limiting the sale of currency" http://www.kp.ru/daily/26429/3301990/
    1. -4
      9 September 2015 08: 15
      Quote: rosarioagro
      "Dmitry Peskov: The Kremlin does not support the idea of ​​limiting the sale of currency"

      If you introduce a restriction, the whole business collapsed in currency will collapse, and the dollar will cost not 70, but 700.
      1. +7
        9 September 2015 09: 04
        Business, tied to speculation in foreign currency, will collapse, so perhaps it would be more correct? As in the proposals of Glazyev it is said "a ban on the purchase of currency by legal entities without grounds for making payment transactions." And why, in this case, the dollar will cost 700 rubles? In December last year, the volume of currency for sale was limited (for a short time), in order to keep speculative "business", the dollar immediately stopped.
  12. +3
    9 September 2015 08: 37
    While iPhone controls the government, Glazyev’s proposals will not work; or a couple of sentences are pulled out, and yet we know that the word taken out of context ... well, then everyone knows. Such a holistic system, as Glazyev suggested, works in its entirety. Clever Glazyev
  13. +3
    9 September 2015 08: 38
    (Yawning) ... so what? Well, Glazyev will present this "program" and then what? Already, the communists offered such programs every year and more than once, and what has changed from this? NOTHING. Nobody will change something from the already formed and "defused". If you change something there, then it is necessary to "move" not childishly, break your brains, not sleep at night, in general, work and work, and even predict different consequences and be responsible for the results and who needs it from those who are "at the top "? That's right, no one. Their motto: "eat deliciously, sleep sweetly, indulge yourself in pleasures, and the economy ... - the" market "will put everything in its place, all problems will resolve themselves ..." What kind of work, what kind of "program" is there? it is necessary to realize what you mean.
    1. -1
      9 September 2015 09: 09
      Quote: Monster_Fat
      (Yawning) ... so what? Well, Glazyev will present this "program" and then what? Already, the communists offered such programs every year and more than once, and what has changed from this? NOTHING. Nobody will change something from the already formed and "defused". If you change something there, then it is necessary to "move" not childishly, break your brains, not sleep at night, in general, work and work, and even predict different consequences and be responsible for the results and who needs it from those who are "at the top "? That's right, no one. Their motto: "eat deliciously, sleep sweetly, indulge yourself in pleasures, and the economy ... - the" market "will put everything in its place, all problems will resolve themselves ..." What kind of work, what kind of "program" is there? it is necessary to realize what you mean.

      Yawn on. We will not touch you and your sofa. hi
  14. +1
    9 September 2015 08: 50
    Glazyev, of course, is clever, his suggestions are sensible, but they will not give adversaries from the government ...
  15. +1
    9 September 2015 08: 57
    This is the last chance for our comprador government, managed by the same compradors. The situation reminds us of what happened in 1905. It can be worse multiple here.
    1. mihasik
      0
      9 September 2015 15: 38
      Quote: rica1952
      This is the last chance for our comprador government, managed by the same compradors. The situation reminds us of what happened in 1905. It can be worse multiple here.

      And here is the question. Who is stopping Putin from resigning the government, Dimuly?
  16. +2
    9 September 2015 09: 05
    That's just with the rotten eggs of the government, headed by the prime minister, and two more pipettes from the Central Bank, and most importantly, can he raise this burden comparable to the actions of PETRA, LENIN, STALIN, I think NO, lack of political will, strategic thinking and planning , here is the answer.
  17. 3vs
    +1
    9 September 2015 10: 03
    What I like about Glazyev is that it offers a concrete solution to issues, simulates a situation,
    all the same, education is obligatory.
    And not empty calls for a "mobilization economy" about which no one can say anything concrete.
  18. +1
    9 September 2015 10: 29
    A well-fed and well-materially secured "vertical" of power will never go voluntarily (in large part), nor will any breakdown of the existing schemes of the economy's functioning (or, in other words, schemes of extracting significant amounts of money for oneself in not very burdensome ways). To the great sadness of most normal people, Russia has two ways - rational and well-thought-out serious actions to organize a new way of society and economy, emanating from a certain leader (new or current), regardless of the squeals of democrats and market people. The second option, if nothing is changed in the construction of the constitution and the country's power structure, is the impoverishment of the people, constant ordeals in search of the "true path" of Russia, under the strict guidance of those to whom the true path of Russia has long been obvious - only to the grave (market people and democrats). They know how to make the country prosperous; there are many who want to repeat the experience of the 90s even now.
  19. 0
    9 September 2015 12: 04
    "We know that he is an economist, we know that he sometimes comes from his academic background and expresses an expert point of view on certain points. And this point of view is not always an expression of the official position of the president or the presidential administration," Peskov explained. quoted by RIA Novosti.
  20. +4
    9 September 2015 12: 15
    In principle, this "idea" of Glazyev is nothing more than a detailing and concretization of the program guidelines of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, formulated in documents since the days of the government of Primakov-Maslyukov-Gerashchenko (1998). This is an ANTILIBERAL program for their DEADLOCK to enter the path of industrialization and scientific and technological progress. The path of the revival of SOCIALISM.
    1. +2
      9 September 2015 12: 44
      This is an anti-liberal program for their deadlock to enter the path of industrialization and scientific and technological progress. The path to the revival of SOCIALISM.

      This path is more like the path of the revival of the real economy and
      rejection of delusional IDEOLOGISTS, which we are stuffed from everywhere every second.
    2. 0
      9 September 2015 13: 35
      Capitalism has come to its next depression. There are only two ways out of it: to continue the "people for the economy" course, and everything will end in World War III. Or take the "economy for the people" path. While our liberals are scaring us with the Communist Party, Switzerland and Finland are planning to introduce a basic income, in fact, this is communism.
    3. 0
      9 September 2015 14: 19
      You are right, full namesake!
  21. +1
    9 September 2015 12: 45
    Yes, the program is really worthwhile. But the question is, who will accept it. A great will is needed here, sweeping aside druzhbanov, liberalism, "market" nonsense in the form of speculators and fans of muddy water. The question is, do we have such people in power? The answer is NO. There are weaklings, traders, cowards, traitors, saboteurs and even outright enemies of the people. "By their deeds, you will recognize them." In those times, they did the same thing as they do now, quietly stealing, ruining the country. And if (plagued by vague doubts and disbelief), they accept Glazyev's program, and even begin to carry it out, then ..... no, I don't believe it.
    1. 0
      9 September 2015 14: 07
      Tambov Wolf - my friend! laughing
      I press a paw!
      - The roots of my grandfathers and great-grandfathers are Tambov.
  22. oof
    +2
    9 September 2015 13: 07
    Glazyev at the premiere, and this is a misunderstanding in the prime minister’s chair, to the dump and his team there.
  23. 0
    9 September 2015 14: 02
    S.Yu. Glazyev has long been trying to convey the truth to the leadership of Russia, since the beginning of the 90s. But, his voice, still - the voice of one crying in the wilderness ...
    I hope that the upcoming legislative changes, which are mentioned in the link below, will give a positive result in the future.
    http://www.nakanune.ru/articles/110875/

    Offers come from others.
    Sergei Andreev says that in the event of a further deterioration in the economic situation, a return to a mobilization economy, deprivatization and nationalization of key sectors of the economy will be reasonable.

    http://вперёдроссия.рф/blog/43579765388/Vsyo,-konchen-bal!-Pomozhe
    t-tolko-natsionalizatsiya-strategiches
  24. 0
    9 September 2015 14: 24
    When a layman looks at a clearing rolled up under asphalt and does not see anyone on it, then the question is, who replaces the obviously tired rower in the galleys, he honestly answers that there are no people to change.

    Glazyev did not grow in the center of this asphalt site and partially sprouted through concrete. And he is not alone, there are people in Russia who are suitable for governing the country.

    The only question is when will this raspberry from the Naibulin, Chuibas, Malomedov, Ulyukaev and other high-ranking Zavoruvs and thieves leave due to retirement age or will be swept away with the rower at the next sharp turn.

    And the second question is whether these masters of effective management will be able to finally finish and tear the country apart before leaving, will there be enough historical time for them and will the people prevent them from killing Russia.

    There is a third question, again from the series when, when these drops of common sense, eroding the wall of liberal managerial crap, will turn into a real force with a supportive people, which will be demolished by their rotten office.
  25. 0
    9 September 2015 14: 40
    Peskov: Glazyev’s proposals do not coincide with the Kremlin’s position | Russian spring08.09.2015 - 13:23
    The plan to strengthen Russia's economic sovereignty does not fit into the Kremlin’s official position. This was stated by presidential press secretary Dmitry Peskov.

    We know that he is an economist, we know that he sometimes comes from his own academic background and makes an expert point of view on certain points. And not always this point of view is an expression of the official position of the president or the presidential administration.

    HERE AND ALL LOVE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    we had and will have
  26. 0
    9 September 2015 18: 22
    The time has come to fight for Russia on the main - internal front. Glazyev’s program, most likely not only his personal, but a patriotic bloc. You can’t retreat anymore, you need to break through this program. If it is not adopted, form a united political bloc and win the election. At such a critical moment in history, the Russian leadership should have only those who think stately, and not count their profits.
  27. 0
    9 September 2015 20: 25
    For general development. Glazyev’s thoughts
  28. +1
    9 September 2015 21: 24
    The worst thing is that the government liberals will pretend that this report was not.
    All the same, Putin himself adheres to liberal ideas, so it may turn out that they will listen carefully, and in the BEST case, they will do nothing.
  29. 0
    10 September 2015 02: 37
    Glazyev’s general logic with the ideology of the government of Dmitry Medvedev and the leadership of the Bank of Russia are incompatible.


    And that is precisely why nothing from Sergey Glazyev’s report on the issue “On additional measures to neutralize threats to the economic security of the Russian Federation under international sanctions” will be implemented.
    Okolokremlyovskogo oligarkat is like a sickle according to causalities.
    Glazyev, in my opinion, is one of the most experienced, nationally oriented economists.
  30. 0
    10 September 2015 10: 43
    give nationalization