Military Review

MFA: the permanent presence of the American military in Ukraine is a gross violation of the Minsk agreements

23
The US military has “firmly established in Ukraine,” which is contrary to the Minsk agreements, said Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova. Her words leads newspaper Look.




“The US military has firmly established itself in Ukraine, which is a gross violation by Kiev of 10 of the Minsk agreements of February of 12,” said Zakharova.

Yesterday Commander 6th fleet USA James Foggo said that the US Navy is trying to maintain an almost constant presence in the Black Sea, "using the rule of freedom of navigation in international waters."

On Monday, large-scale Sea Breeze maneuvers began off the coast of Ukraine, involving about 2,5 thousand people from various countries, including the United States.

Zakharova also noted that Russia "is forced to take into account in its defense planning" US preparations in Europe.

On the eve of the Pentagon’s intention to reopen the base of Coleman’s Barracks in Germany due to the situation in Ukraine. In addition, a NATO spokesman announced the creation of 6 headquarters in Eastern Europe, which should become the alliance reference points.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com/
23 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Siberia55
    Siberia55 4 September 2015 12: 06 New
    0
    Want peace, get ready for war!
    1. Infinity
      Infinity 4 September 2015 12: 08 New
      +3
      They are simply exceptional. For them, "War is Peace."
      And the Ukrainians want to be like that! (but they won’t, because Ukraine belongs to the USA). And the USA needs only money.
      “At present, Ukrainian troops have almost completed the concentration of forces for the planned offensive. In areas selected as the direction of the main strike (south of Donetsk), their superiority over the opposing parts of the BCH is estimated as approximately 5-fold. Sheltered behind a deeply echeloned defense, the APU group has an emphasized offensive configuration, ”writes Igor Strelkov in the Vkontakte“ Summary from the militia of New Russia ”group.

      USAUSA
      1. zombiunian
        zombiunian 4 September 2015 12: 25 New
        0
        what exclusivity? after Hiroshima and Nagasaki!
    2. Lord of the Sith
      Lord of the Sith 4 September 2015 12: 31 New
      +2
      Near Artyomovsky, the Ukrainian military shot and killed a fellow "separat". In the Artyomovsky district of the occupied DPR, a Ukrainian soldier shot and killed a colleague. This was reported by the press service of the prosecutor's office of Donetsk region. "On September 2, at about 18:30 in the location of the military unit of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, which are based in the Artyomovsky district of Donetsk region, a soldier killed his colleague born in 1981," the prosecutor’s office said. It was tentatively established that a conflict arose between the two Armed Forces servicemen on the basis of political disagreements, as a result of which one of the men drew his weapon and shouted "die Separ!" shot at the opponent twice. The victim was immediately hospitalized, but died from his injuries. Now the offender is detained in accordance with Article 208 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of Ukraine. The issue of reporting him suspected of committing a criminal offense under Part 1 is being resolved. 115 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine (premeditated murder), election of a preventive measure and transfer of the case to the military prosecutor's office.
    3. siberalt
      siberalt 4 September 2015 13: 16 New
      0
      For the stay of the US military pays Outskirts. Another Maidan is brewing.
  2. marlin1203
    marlin1203 4 September 2015 12: 07 New
    0
    "But who will plant him? He is a monument!" laughing
  3. Byshido_dis
    Byshido_dis 4 September 2015 12: 07 New
    +1
    There are coordinates, and I think they understand very well that we only need to add them to the memory of warheads ... Does this only understand the indigenous population of these countries? ...
  4. Finches
    Finches 4 September 2015 12: 07 New
    +8
    It was necessary in February 14 to send troops when the legitimate president of Ukraine asked for help, and now what’s there .... They put themselves on cancer - having recognized the junta, now we’ll have to reckon with our friends, or rather, with the owners of the junta!
    1. sever.56
      sever.56 4 September 2015 12: 12 New
      +3
      Sorry, but I don’t remember something that Yanukovych asked for help from Russia in the form of troops. The fact that our special services saved him from the fate of Gaddafi was.
      1. Finches
        Finches 4 September 2015 12: 20 New
        +5
        I’m giving you a link where Churkin reads a letter from Yanukovych to the UN Security Council: https: //www.youtube.com/watch? V = a2oFPZRMBvM

        Look please!
        1. sever.56
          sever.56 4 September 2015 12: 31 New
          +2
          Quote: Finches
          I’m giving you a link where Churkin reads a letter from Yanukovych to the UN Security Council

          Eugene, thanks for the info! hi
          But, you must admit, that if then we got involved in both the Crimea and the Donbass, then the West could accuse us of aggression against Ukraine. In Crimea, there was a different situation: - our troops, a well-organized referendum.
          1. Finches
            Finches 4 September 2015 12: 37 New
            +5
            The West would have blamed us in any situation! The USA would not have survived the loss of Ukraine in which it invested so much money for a coup, but could not have done anything! There would be the same sanctions, the same escalated Russophobia and hysteria, but there would be no war in the Donbass, and Yanukovych would sit in his chair, with his team!
          2. GradusHuK
            GradusHuK 4 September 2015 12: 47 New
            +3
            Why don't we blame the west for aggression?
            1. Finches
              Finches 4 September 2015 12: 53 New
              0
              Why? I would answer with the words of the hero of Schwarzenegger Ivan Danko: "Capitalism!"
              Unfortunately, in this political and economic formation, the interests of supranational transnational corporations are higher than national interests! And not one, not even the most popularly elected one, will break this ... In any country in the world! The most obvious example is the 35th president of the United States, and our representatives in these corporations are far from at the forefront ...
              It is possible to blame, but who will, but also the point?
    2. Voha_krim
      Voha_krim 4 September 2015 12: 19 New
      +1
      Quote: Finches
      when the legitimate president of Ukraine asked for help, and now what is really there ....

      Did he ask? Yes, to hell there! Because he was late for his "greens", which had never been in "his" state!
      1. Finches
        Finches 4 September 2015 12: 21 New
        +1
        I asked, I asked! See my comment above with reference to the source.
    3. am808s
      am808s 4 September 2015 15: 10 New
      +1
      And for this it is necessary to thank our oligarchs, whose interests in the form of factories and factories and Russian troops will only enter there through their corpse.
      1. Finches
        Finches 4 September 2015 20: 06 New
        0
        That's right! That's what I wrote a little higher about - about supranational transnational corporations!
  5. andrei332809
    andrei332809 4 September 2015 12: 07 New
    0
    what are you?! these are the warriors of light, opposing the hordes of the Mordor fool
  6. SAM 5
    SAM 5 4 September 2015 12: 08 New
    +1
    US troops "firmly established in Ukraine"

    So everything is allowed to P. indos, I thought something like that. repeat
    1. DIVAN SOLDIER
      DIVAN SOLDIER 4 September 2015 12: 11 New
      0
      And now, what do not you think?
      1. SAM 5
        SAM 5 4 September 2015 12: 56 New
        0
        And now, what do not you think?

        Oh, how wrong I was. wink
    2. Voha_krim
      Voha_krim 4 September 2015 12: 24 New
      0
      Quote: SAM 5
      So everything is allowed to P. indos, I thought something like that.

      Worst of all, they themselves believe that they, “exceptional”, are allowed everything sad
  7. JonnyT
    JonnyT 4 September 2015 12: 15 New
    +1
    and take it off is useless to conclude at least some kind of agreement, they do not put these pieces of paper
    1. DIVAN SOLDIER
      DIVAN SOLDIER 4 September 2015 12: 29 New
      0
      Well, nothing, we have already prepared a batch of notes of protest and deep concerns.
  8. Thomas
    Thomas 4 September 2015 12: 20 New
    +2
    Yesterday I heard this news on television. And frankly, there was alarm. But what if the Americans take insolently, and even announce the deployment of their military contingent in Odessa under the slogan, for example, of stabilizing the situation in the region and supporting a priority partner?
    How will Russia react? Will it be able to respond adequately?
    It is already clear that many of their instructors, along with some military equipment, are currently in Ukraine, but the USA is becoming more impudent every day, and sooner or later they will do it anyway, and Odessa, like me already wrote, in my personal opinion, a key city. In the event of the development of the conflict, and it will, they will cling precisely to it, sacrificing areas of left-bank Ukraine.
    1. Loner_53
      Loner_53 4 September 2015 12: 24 New
      +1
      Quote: Thomas
      How will Russia react? Will it be able to respond adequately?

      Only the Lord knows, in our cunningly wise plans, the devil will break his leg
    2. zombiunian
      zombiunian 4 September 2015 12: 27 New
      0
      I'm afraid they will bring democracy to Odessa under the wings of airplanes, don’t go to your grandmother
    3. ZKB
      ZKB 4 September 2015 12: 47 New
      +1
      LET'S ESTIMATE THE SETTINGS SOBERLY. in the coming years there will be no direct military clash between Russia and NATO. It is necessary to increase tension, therefore, the exercises and deployment of NATO in Europe. Well, why the hell does Odessa need, accessible to a massive strike by aviation, artillery, fleet from Crimea ??? the goal is to keep the world community in suspense and not to let the Chinese Dragon with its powerful industry make friends with the Taiga Master with its colossal natural resource base.
    4. Foul skeptic
      Foul skeptic 4 September 2015 16: 51 New
      -1
      Quote: Thomas
      But what if the Americans take the impudence, and even announce the deployment of their military contingent in Odessa

      Place-place. And the contingent in Odessa, and the radar near Kharkov. A lot of things and who will post.
      Quote: Thomas
      How will Russia react? Will it be able to respond adequately?

      Go to the next branch, see the graphs of the dependence on imports. This is practically the answer to your question.
  9. vovanpain
    vovanpain 4 September 2015 12: 26 New
    +9
    Russia has always had only two allies — the army and the navy. Someone who does not feed his army will feed someone else’s. An example of how this country really confirms this.
  10. Masya masya
    Masya masya 4 September 2015 12: 28 New
    +5
    I would be very surprised if these agreements were respected!
  11. twincam
    twincam 4 September 2015 12: 31 New
    0
    Sooner or later, military clashes will begin in the Asian region and in Europe.
  12. Prussian
    Prussian 4 September 2015 12: 45 New
    0
    Let's analyze where they can surpass us, it is obvious that in connection and target designation. The costs are minimal, saturating the leading edge with UAV artillery radars and high-quality communications is not very costly for Americans, and in a large-caliber war, the effect can be maximal.
  13. roskot
    roskot 4 September 2015 13: 04 New
    0
    Minsk agreements are only for the DPR and LPR.
    And the states use them for their own purposes. There are no places where they leave voluntarily. Such is democracy.
  14. Prutkov
    Prutkov 4 September 2015 13: 38 New
    0
    Quote: Thomas
    Yesterday I heard this news on television. And frankly, there was alarm. But what if the Americans take insolently, and even announce the deployment of their military contingent in Odessa under the slogan, for example, of stabilizing the situation in the region and supporting a priority partner?
    How will Russia react? Will it be able to respond adequately?
    It is already clear that many of their instructors, along with some military equipment, are currently in Ukraine, but the USA is becoming more impudent every day, and sooner or later they will do it anyway, and Odessa, like me already wrote, in my personal opinion, a key city. In the event of the development of the conflict, and it will, they will cling precisely to it, sacrificing areas of left-bank Ukraine.

    There will be Vietnam-2. I think that US now, during the presidential race is not necessary.
  15. Foul skeptic
    Foul skeptic 4 September 2015 16: 54 New
    0
    Maria Zakharova also did not read the Minsk agreements.
  16. Vovan 73
    Vovan 73 4 September 2015 17: 22 New
    0
    Stating this ... what is our Foreign Ministry counting on ????? The fact that someone hears and supports him from Europe ?????? The countries of NATO participants - by the way (including our former "allies" in the internal affairs department) By declaring this, our Foreign Ministry loudly declares our weakness. But if, in the OPEN PRESENCE of foreign military advisers and representatives of various PMCs, our country would have declared through the Foreign Ministry. that on the territory of the DLNR, in response to the machinations, etc. Russia is forced to place ...... and then an impressive list of military missions would follow ..... That would be a worthy answer to Cheberlein. We are an aggressor for them. advance to blame for everything. so what beads before throwing pigs. Or do the tops consider a decent option (for themselves) in the subsequent surrender ?????
  17. Thompson
    Thompson 5 September 2015 16: 18 New
    0
    Quote: Thomas
    Yesterday I heard this news on television. And frankly, there was alarm. But what if the Americans take insolently, and even announce the deployment of their military contingent in Odessa under the slogan, for example, of stabilizing the situation in the region and supporting a priority partner?
    How will Russia react? Will it be able to respond adequately?
    It is already clear that many of their instructors, along with some military equipment, are currently in Ukraine, but the USA is becoming more impudent every day, and sooner or later they will do it anyway, and Odessa, like me already wrote, in my personal opinion, a key city. In the event of the development of the conflict, and it will, they will cling precisely to it, sacrificing areas of left-bank Ukraine.

    Remember, give a finger, a bite on the elbow. So here! Just let them catch on ...
    In vain ours play diplomacy. The conspiracy against Russia is clearly visible!