Experts: Britain should protect Eastern Europe from Russia

Britain must deploy its troops in Eastern Europe on an ongoing basis in order to protect its allies from "aggressive" Russia, experts at the Henry Jackson Society believe.




The authors of the report titled “After the Crimea: Towards a New British Geostrategy for Eastern Europe” accused Moscow of “aggressive foreign policy” and “provocations”.

"The current regime in Russia poses a serious threat to the allies of Britain in Eastern Europe, and therefore the UK itself," quotes analysts RIA News.

Such a situation "will probably require the military presence of Great Britain in Eastern Europe, including the permanent deployment of British troops in allied countries under threat, to ensure the European continent - a key component of the British geostrategic defense system - prosperity and security," the report says.

The agency recalls that relations between the West and the Russian Federation have deteriorated due to the situation in Ukraine. Western politicians accuse Russia of annexing the Crimea and supporting the militia in the Donbas.
Photos used:
http://www.globallookpress.com/
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

60 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Roman1970 2 September 2015 08: 31 New
    • 10
    • 0
    +10
    The authors of the report titled “After the Crimea: Towards a New British Geostrategy for Eastern Europe” accused Moscow of “aggressive foreign policy” and “provocations”.
    Aggressive ... Yes, about this "aggression" only the lazy in Europe did not say. Loot is mastered, that's all. They were already looking for a submarine, they were afraid of our planes. Now, apparently, they will look for undermines under the border.
    1. kodxnumx 2 September 2015 08: 38 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Shaving as always in his repertoire!
      1. svetoruss 2 September 2015 08: 52 New
        • 7
        • 0
        +7
        The current regime in Russia poses a serious threat to the allies of Britain in Eastern Europe, and therefore the UK itself ”
        Based on this phrase, they are valid for the last 400 years ...
        1. comprochikos 2 September 2015 09: 56 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          They would first protect themselves
          1. Andrey NM 2 September 2015 10: 31 New
            • 5
            • 0
            +5
            They already defended Czechoslovakia in 1939, and in France they defended everyone so that they barely carried their feet from Dunkirk. Let them say thanks to Hitler for the fact that the “main Aryan” took a pause in the offensive. They fled so that they abandoned all equipment and weapons, and at the same time their allies. And the flight operation was called Dynamo. In this title, the whole essence of the Anglo-Saxons.
      2. lelikas 2 September 2015 09: 10 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: kod3001
        Shaving as always in his repertoire!

        Yeah, and the report itself, began with the words - "British scientists have proven .."
        1. WKS
          WKS 2 September 2015 09: 55 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          And where will the soldiers be recruited? And what kind of shisha? What remains of the British Empire have neither one nor the other.
        2. RUSIVAN 2 September 2015 22: 47 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          British scientists-British tankers have proved ...
      3. Vend 2 September 2015 09: 15 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Quote: kod3001
        The current regime in Russia poses a serious threat to the allies of Britain in Eastern Europe, and hence the UK itself

        Quote: kod3001
        Shaving as always in his repertoire!

        But if you read their words in a different way, it becomes clear that the British understand aggression as the growing influence of Russia and Russian ideas and the weakening of British influence and British ideas.
      4. CALL. 2 September 2015 09: 20 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Great Britain must deploy troops in Eastern Europe on an ongoing basis

        Sign the petition - Close the fake Polish memorials in Mednoye (Tver region) and Katyn (Smolensk region) 843 votes left
        https://www.change.org/p/%D0%B3%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%B4%D1%83%D0%BC%D0%B5-%D1%80%D1%84
        -%D0%B7%D0%B0%D0%BA%D1%80%D1%8B%D1%82%D1%8C-%D1%84%D0%B0%D0%BB%D1%8C%D1%88%D0%B8
        %D0%B2%D1%8B%D0%B9-%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BC%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%B0%D0%BB-%D0%BA%D0%B0
        %D1%82%D1%8B%D0%BD%D1%8C
      5. CALL. 2 September 2015 09: 26 New
        • 5
        • 0
        +5
        The authors of the report titled “After the Crimea: Towards a New British Geostrategy for Eastern Europe” accused Moscow of “aggressive foreign policy” and “provocations”.

        But I wonder what did the arrogant Saxons do in Libya and Iraq? They stopped the Russian aggression.
        1. 0255 2 September 2015 10: 15 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: Z.O.V.
          The authors of the report titled “After the Crimea: Towards a New British Geostrategy for Eastern Europe” accused Moscow of “aggressive foreign policy” and “provocations”.

          But I wonder what did the arrogant Saxons do in Libya and Iraq? They stopped the Russian aggression.

          Rather, they stopped the lives of the people of Libya am
      6. Mareman Vasilich 2 September 2015 09: 32 New
        • 5
        • 0
        +5
        Anglo-Saxons are kidding. They always fought with the wrong hands, to the last ally.
      7. st25310 2 September 2015 09: 33 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Britain itself needs to be protected, for example, from refugees.
      8. marlin1203 2 September 2015 10: 47 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Well, yes ... loudly declare their participation in the war and wait until the Americans harness for them laughing
    2. Truth 2 September 2015 08: 49 New
      • 10
      • 0
      +10
      Quote: Roman1970
      to protect allies from “aggressive” Russia

      Well, here it’s actually something else, if you look closely and deeply ...
      In the East of Europe they are already beginning to seriously scratch their turnips - but have we laid down under those?
      And it’s not politicians who comb, Fabington holds them firmly for Faberge, ordinary people already talk loudly about it - it's expensive to buy everyone, but you can pin down and shut up.
      So that the Britons there need not a defending force, but a police force, for God forbid, whoever slipped towards the East or some other "wrong" side.
      1. KazaK Bo 2 September 2015 09: 25 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Truth
        Quote: Roman1970
        to protect allies from “aggressive” Russia
        Well, here it’s actually something else, if you look closely and deeply ...
        In the East of Europe, they are already beginning to seriously comb their turnips - but have we laid down for those? ...

        All true Americans already understood that the vector of political assessments and measures, both in the world, and especially in Europe ... towards Russia began to change dramatically not in their favor ... Everyone is already tired of the arrogant dictate of Obama and K *. .. begin to really think about the interests of their countries ... Washington really doesn’t like it .. here and place their Watchdog to watch for the "NOT FULL" ALLIES ... "Taskmaster" from the "tanned" war prize winner and all current troubles must ensure the former power of the overseas master over his already rebellious vassals ... return them, to Obama's place, in the American stall ...
        Well, let’s “protect” ... 15-20 minutes ... because if we are “driven” into a corner ... no more time is needed to “tell” those who came to us with weapons ... how they are wrong! But Europe already understands that "they just threw it" ... and there is hardly any need for such radical "stories" about ... WHAT IS GOOD ... WHAT IS SO PAIN !!!
    3. vodolaz 2 September 2015 08: 53 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Well, the British need to somehow explain the modernization of their submarine fleet in the amount of as many as 4 pieces.
    4. just exp 2 September 2015 08: 55 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      there is not only loot, here we are lined up on all sides.
      Well, you need to understand how cynical they are, if they understand that we also understand that they are lying, that is, they look into our eyes, they know that they want to destroy us, but they still pretend that in fact we are dangerous, and not they.
      along the way, they learned about conscience only in the cinema; they had nowhere else to watch it.
    5. Alexey-74 2 September 2015 09: 09 New
      • 8
      • 0
      +8
      Cool Britons gathered to defend Eastern Europe, and who will protect Britain itself from "aggressive Russia" ...... laughing
    6. little girl15 2 September 2015 10: 22 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Will Britain not tear herself from such an overwhelming burden? Will not all bushes in the geyropa get numb?
  2. Tanais 2 September 2015 08: 33 New
    • 26
    • 0
    +26
    IN, Events
    Experts: Britain should protect Eastern Europe from Russia


    I ask you not to draw VIA CHUR DIRECT direct analogies between my post and historical processes, but I want to note that Great Britain once defended France, and indeed Poland, Norway, Czechoslovakia ...

    This is about her ability to "protect."

    Dunkirk...
    1. Penetrator 2 September 2015 08: 39 New
      • 7
      • 0
      +7
      Quote: Tanais

      I ask you not to draw VIA CHUR DIRECT direct analogies between my post and historical processes, but I want to note that Great Britain once defended France, and indeed Poland, Norway, Czechoslovakia ...

      This is about her ability to "protect" ...

      They could protect themselves solely because of their insular position.
      1. SSR
        SSR 2 September 2015 08: 47 New
        • 5
        • 0
        +5
        Quote: Penetrator
        Quote: Tanais

        I ask you not to draw VIA CHUR DIRECT direct analogies between my post and historical processes, but I want to note that Great Britain once defended France, and indeed Poland, Norway, Czechoslovakia ...

        This is about her ability to "protect" ...

        They could protect themselves solely because of their insular position.

        Only these snobs are forgotten, now is not the 37th and not the 19th century))) and Russia can protect itself and the Irish without crossing the borders of the Nagliya with the boot of a Russian soldier and that their "tridents" in Scotland will not help.
        Anglo-Saxons are akin to the virus infecting entire continents and islands.
    2. smart Fox 2 September 2015 08: 40 New
      • 6
      • 0
      +6
      And how she protected America from the Indians everyone knows !!!
      1. Tanais 2 September 2015 09: 15 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: sly fox
        And how she protected America from the Indians everyone knows !!!

        Well, there, shaving, were only at the source of "glorious deeds."

        In general, the continent "protected", but really cleared of the Indian tribes, already its "offspring", USA ...
    3. Roman1970 2 September 2015 08: 45 New
      • 6
      • 0
      +6
      Retreat in the Ardennes
      Ah, how fun we were
      When toss us off!
      Life weighed nothing
      Death meant nothing.
      There were five of us
      In a dank dugout.
      The command is crazy
      And already draped.
      We are from a can
      In a circle they drank whiskey
      Destroyed forms
      Orders, cards, lists,
      And, distant hearing the battle,
      I am a miserable servant of the Lord -
      For the first time I was myself
      For the first time was free!
      I was free, God sees
      From all doubt and anxiety
      I got caught on the net.
      I was free damn
      From your vain fuss
      And from everything in the world! ..
      I will forget the wet forest
      And that dawn, - he was whitish, -
      And like amid ghostly trunks
      Flowed human mess,
      But I will never forget
      How we plucked the wires
      Like in a dugout, orders were burned,
      How they ruined everything they could
      And how fun we were!
    4. Zoldat_A 2 September 2015 08: 48 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      Quote: Tanais
      I want to note that Great Britain once defended France, and indeed Poland, Norway, Czechoslovakia ...

      This is about her ability to "protect."

      Dunkirk...

      For some reason, it was this “protection” that occurred to me. And also how they protected India from the Indians.
      1. Scoun 2 September 2015 11: 23 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        Quote: Zoldat_A
        For some reason, it was this “protection” that occurred to me. And also how they protected India from the Indians.

        the list of atrocities of these parasites is huge (I will attach a link)
        A large part of the Irish population, including women and children, was turned into white slaves and taken to English colonies in the West Indies. People at that time in Ireland cost less than wolves - for example, English soldiers were paid 5 pounds for the head of a “rebel or priest,” and 6 pounds for a wolf’s head.

        Human life is cheaper than a wolf.
        - The first large-scale concentration camps were also created by the Anglo-Saxons - during the Inter-State Civil War. The first concentration camps, in the modern sense of the word, were created by the British Lord Kitchener in South Africa for Boer families during the so-called Boer War of 1899-1902

        In the years 1769-770. in Bengal, plundered by the British, a famine broke out, which claimed one third of the inhabitants - 7 million people [Great Soviet Encyclopedia 1953: 60]. (According to other estimates, it’s 10 million [Antonova, Bongard-Levin, Kotovsky 1979: 283; Ghosh 1951: 20; Bosch 1935: 17].) In the 1780-1790s, the tragedy in Bengal repeated itself: this time it died out of starvation already half the population is 10 million people [Huber, Kheifets 1961: 55].

        By the way, the people of Tasmania ...
        How the British exterminated the Tasmanians
        ... Are we dealing with smart monkeys or very underdeveloped people?
        Oldfield, 1865
        The only reasonable and logical decision regarding the lower race is to destroy it.
        G.J. Wells, 1902

        “A lot of blacks with women and children gathered in a ravine near the city ... men were sitting around a big fire, while women were busy preparing food for dinner. The natives were taken aback by a detachment of soldiers who without warning opened fire on them and then rushed to kill the wounded. One soldier pierced with a bayonet a child crawling near his murdered mother, and threw him into the fire. " This soldier himself spoke about his “feat” to the traveler Hull, and when the latter expressed indignation at his cruelty, he exclaimed with sincere surprise: “It was only a child!”

        PS
        for some reason we are all talking about the atrocities of bearded men, Islamists and other riffraffers ... and the British somehow manage to distance themselves ... these jackals in sheep's clothing.
        link with photo
        and another RF link is not inserted into ru-an.info (with links) the gibberish is obtained.
        http://masterok.livejournal.com/1035943.html
        1. Zoldat_A 2 September 2015 23: 44 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Quote: Scoun
          and the British somehow manage to distance themselves ... these jackals in sheep's clothing.

          The map is especially successful - "the sun never sets over Britain" ... I would be with the map in place of Churkin as with a flag — I would go to UN meetings and as soon as someone blundered to me about Russian aggression ... am
  3. avvg 2 September 2015 08: 33 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Without the Anglo-Saxons, the world in Eastern Europe will begin to collapse; they position themselves as "the navel of the earth."
  4. Das Boot 2 September 2015 08: 35 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    b / \ I, they are there the savior of eastern Europe when will the thread finally be appointed ??? And then -
    1. Albert1 2 September 2015 08: 44 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Right to the point! wassat In general, it has long been necessary to stop responding to this kind of news, even if at least everyone in the trenches dug up there.
  5. Name 2 September 2015 08: 36 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    Britain has long ceased to be Great ... Navel will tear apart deploy troops in Eastern Europe on an ongoing basis.
    1. VseDoFeNi 2 September 2015 08: 43 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Amery, by the way, too. Especially with their scale cut dough. So much of the military budget is sawn so much every year that Russia had enough for almost the entire rearmament program until 2020.
    2. Tanais 2 September 2015 09: 06 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Quote: name
      Britain is no longer Great ...


      But slavish inferiority does not give them the opportunity to make claims against those who actually threw them off the pedestal of the metropolis ...

      They forget that it’s not even the "British Lion on an American Leash", but this:
  6. Diviz 2 September 2015 08: 38 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    UK is a small island which may not exist in the near future. What is written in the article is agony.
  7. Siberia55 2 September 2015 08: 41 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    Closer, closer banderlogs ...
  8. Wolka 2 September 2015 08: 42 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Torri has the same disease as the Yankees, in short, do not try to solve other people's problems, first solve your ...
    1. VseDoFeNi 2 September 2015 08: 47 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      This is a technique to solve other people's problems. And these decisions, we must pay tribute to the arrogant Saxons, end up with big problems for their rivals.
  9. rotmistr60 2 September 2015 08: 42 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    Great Britain must deploy troops in Eastern Europe on an ongoing basis in order to protect allies from “aggressive” Russia

    England missed the colonies. And here, under the guise, you can get into Eastern Europe, without shooting and casualties. These experts understand that Russia is not threatening, and therefore it will not be necessary to protect its partners and sacrifice its soldiers. Soon, Eastern Europe will be divided into spheres of influence.
  10. veksha50 2 September 2015 08: 44 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    "" The existing regime in Russia poses a serious threat to the allies of Britain in Eastern Europe, and therefore the UK itself "" ...

    I dream all about the time when the historical truth will triumph and Naglia will get in the teeth from Russia ...
  11. X Y Z 2 September 2015 08: 47 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Some kind of old imperial burp, memories of past greatness, the desire to play games that can no longer afford. Today, they themselves are not quite capable of protecting themselves, without the help of the United States. Yes, and in the past, the British infantry was not famous for its special fighting qualities and differed mainly in colonial wars.
    1. Das Boot 2 September 2015 09: 09 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: XYZ
      Some kind of old imperial burp

      right. They are trying again to act as a decider of fate. Without colonies, without West and East India companies, they are just a pathetic island somewhere between the Shetlands and Ireland ....
      The Yankees picked out all the diamonds from the crown, and they still lick their ass.
      Although, frankly, I like London. And in general, the country is beautiful. And at Guernsey they showed me a grandfather who remembered the German occupation and had never once left the island.
  12. sl22277 2 September 2015 08: 47 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Europe, what is hysterical, and membership in NATO for what then? Do the British themselves know this? I think this "concern" is due to recent events in Syria.
  13. evil partisan 2 September 2015 08: 48 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Britain must protect Eastern Europe from Russia
    And Britain must close its mouth and take apart its poop at home. For example, with a public debt. And she must host 10 Arabs and Africans. If in fairness - and even more ...
  14. vladimirw 2 September 2015 08: 51 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    the British, as usual, want a lot and always at the expense of others.
  15. morpogr 2 September 2015 08: 53 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    You cannot protect yourself from migrants, but here you decided to become the defenders of Europe.
  16. olegkrava 2 September 2015 09: 02 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: Roman1970
    The authors of the report titled “After the Crimea: Towards a New British Geostrategy for Eastern Europe” accused Moscow of “aggressive foreign policy” and “provocations”.
    Aggressive ... Yes, about this "aggression" only the lazy in Europe did not say. Loot is mastered, that's all. They were already looking for a submarine, they were afraid of our planes. Now, apparently, they will look for undermines under the border.

    The whole British strategy is to chat, take a moment, and at the right time to dump like with PQ convoys.
  17. RuslanNN 2 September 2015 09: 08 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    It is necessary to protect the world from small Britain. Already got what they are, that mattresses, forever preoccupied
  18. Neophyte 2 September 2015 09: 16 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Reign, Britain to hell! Homegrown experts forget that the British will soon become
    in the status of a minority nation. Crowds of foreigners have long prevailed in London.
    Soon, Lizka will be driven out into the street, trade hot dogs, and the Angles dream of protection
    Eastern Europe? Funny, sir!
  19. tomsk 2 September 2015 09: 20 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    needless to say ... if our submarine escort tug quietly cruised off their shores and they didn't know anything about it. crap britain. their sea dominion has long ended, and they all puff past!
  20. Tanker55 2 September 2015 09: 22 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    First, let them protect their blue-eyed ass from the beginning, and then look further.
    1. Das Boot 2 September 2015 10: 39 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Quote: Tankman55
      butt blue-eyed

      laughing cool pranking) We would have sent a film crew in full force to Sklif, I think.
  21. roskot 2 September 2015 09: 28 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    This situation "will likely require a British military presence in Eastern Europe,

    Shaw, and these preoccupied. Gathered in a hike.
  22. Nick888 2 September 2015 09: 30 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Let the Canadian Armed Forces, the Australian and Japanese, and other satellites, and the Americans themselves be pulled into Eastern Europe, and more. It will be easier to destroy one massive attack.
  23. roskot 2 September 2015 09: 30 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    “The current regime in Russia poses a serious threat to Britain’s allies in Eastern Europe, and therefore to Britain itself,”

    But from the taiga to the British seas
    The Red Army is the strongest !!!
  24. roskot 2 September 2015 09: 37 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    After Crimea: to the new British geostrategy for Eastern Europe, Moscow was accused of an “aggressive foreign policy” and of “provocations”.

    If we talk and persuade, then the arrogant Western erysipelas will appear at our borders.
  25. Vega 2 September 2015 09: 49 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    There are few US troops in Europe, so the British must also be dragged. You might think Britain has no concerns.
  26. puppet 2 September 2015 09: 49 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    What, they want to take away bread from NATO?
  27. MATROSKIN-53 2 September 2015 09: 50 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    I do not recall from history that the English warriors anywhere and ever win ?! They can only fight with the Papuans, armed with bows and arrows and then with great difficulty. And are these bzduns trying to intimidate Russia? Yes, never! Do not touch the Russian peasant and he will not touch anyone. But if you hit him on the left cheek ... he will color the entire face of the offender in response and turn her into an asshole!
  28. Loner_53 2 September 2015 09: 52 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    This situation "will likely require a British military presence in Eastern Europe, including the permanent deployment of British troops in allied countries,

    Black forces are gathering at the borders of Holy Russia, we will be vigilant Comrades! We must be prepared for everything.
    Glory to Russia!!!
  29. pv1005 2 September 2015 09: 54 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    And what are the big-eyeers already unable to cope with this task ?? request
  30. halzan7 2 September 2015 10: 00 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Estimate did not even start, but already crap. recourse
  31. atamankko 2 September 2015 10: 31 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    They want to fool under the new colonies
    acquire, we understand nostalgia.
  32. slaw14 2 September 2015 11: 12 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    this bump in the ocean forgot about the annexation of the Falkland Islands (Malvinas) off Argentina. We should also think about protecting South America from the "aggressive foreign policy" of the Anglo-Saxons.
  33. Abakan 2 September 2015 12: 30 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: Mareman Vasilich
    to the last ally.

    to the last hoch (macha) or (la) ??? as I understand it)))
  34. sisa29 2 September 2015 13: 17 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    It would be better if sanctions were added. For example, all deposits of “Russians” in their banks would be frozen or they would stop giving us British visas.
  35. GEORGE 2 September 2015 13: 55 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: svetoruss
    The current regime in Russia poses a serious threat to the allies of Britain in Eastern Europe, and therefore the UK itself ”
    Based on this phrase, they are valid for the last 400 years ...

    And they themselves occupy the whole of Europe in a quiet one that they could not capture 70 years ago ... hi
  36. PValery53 2 September 2015 21: 45 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The hypocritical British, "defending Eastern Europe", will leave their "rear drive" naked, where they will receive unacceptable troubles ...
  37. Olegater 2 September 2015 22: 49 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    United Kingdom should post your troops in eastern europe on an ongoing basis in order to protect the allies from “aggressive” Russia, experts at the Henry Jackson Society believe. nifiga to himself, where are the impudent, and where is the eastern Europe.
    “The current regime in Russia represents a serious threat to British allies in eastern europe, and therefore the UK itself ". That's what it means for the sake of something there impudent z.o .... u. ready to tear yourself (well, at the same time allies) As the saying goes, impudent people have constant interests but no permanent friends. Yes, with friends like lemongrass and enemies is not necessary. Constantly throwing, crap and stealing - jackal.
    And still fun "This situation" will likely require a British military presence in Eastern Europe, including the permanent deployment of British troops in threatened allies to ensure the European continent - a key component of the British geostrategic defense system - prosperity and security. "" Here ... with arrogant impudent them in a door they in a window.