Central Asia: Russia's place in the region

18


The region of Central Asia is a zone of historical clash of interests of world powers. It was in this direction, many centuries ago, Alexander the Great organized his campaign; it was here that the bloody battles unfolded related to the conquests of Tamerlane. Central Asia is the center of the world. The one who controls this region is able to largely determine the fate of the continent and even of all mankind.

Who is fighting for presence in the region now, when the USSR is a long time ago, and the existing forms of economic and military-political integration of the countries of Central Asia with their neighbors are based on the so-called "multipolar" principle, declared, for example, by Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan, whose soldiers accept participation not only in the exercises of the CSTO countries, but also of the NATO countries, taking on their territory their airbases (Manas) and reforming the armed forces according to the patterns of their Anglo-Saxon "partners"?

We will not say anything new, stating a very strange policy of the leadership of the Central Asian states in terms of compliance with their allied obligations, which, although not openly declared, definitely have a place to be, as soon as we have a military-political bloc called the CSTO. At the same time, the leadership of Russia pretends that it does not notice anything, continuing to repeat about the "century-old friendship of our peoples", about the joint victory in the Great Patriotic War. What is it: the subtle policy of our strategists or the banal weakness of the Russian state, the recognition of their own insolvency, the final refusal of Russia from the imperial policy?

To say that Russia over the past 20 years has been very well squeezed in the region is to say nothing. If we do not talk about air bases, military exercises and other forms of military-political pressure exerted on the region by NATO and the United States, and banally analyze the situation with the Russian language in Central Asia, a lot will immediately become clear. Since the collapse of the USSR, the Russian language has lost the status of the state language in most countries of the region. The exception is Kyrgyzstan, where Russian is the second state language, although this does not fundamentally change the situation. In Kyrgyzstan, as well as in Kazakhstan, the general renaming of streets, villages, regions and regional centers continues, which in the vast majority of cases is absurd in nature, without any historical the basics. The teaching of the Russian language in all countries of the region has been reduced to the minimum permissible limits or has been completely canceled, and therefore, by now, there are practically no people under the age of 30 in Uzbekistan, Tajikistan and Turkmenistan who can write, read and speak correctly Russian. Russians can easily be convinced of this by the example of migrant workers from Central Asia working in the country. Meanwhile, along with the Russian language, the Russian mentality and culture are leaving the region, and with them the political influence of Russia disappears without a trace, giving way to pan-Turkism, nationalism and radical Islamism, which is successfully taking root in an empty place. The Russians remaining in Central Asia, despite statements by individual Russian politicians that “everyone has long left,” continue to leave. Migration sentiments are especially strong in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan, which seriously threatens demographic stability and catastrophically undermines Russia's strategic influence in these countries. As for the remaining countries of the region, there are almost no Russians left there, which is an additional factor in strengthening the positions of the USA, China and Islamists, perhaps more significant than any airbase. In addition to the traditional players that have been present in the region for a long time, recently, new powers have also become active in the Central Asian direction: Turkey, which, however, has been promoting the ideas of pan-Turkism here since the collapse of the Union, India, Pakistan and Iran.

With all this, it is not a secret to anyone that Central Asia is one of the most explosive regions of the planet, capable of catching the Afghan virus or the Arab spring virus. And alarm bells and even calls have already been. Recall the Tajik turmoil of the nineties, two Kyrgyz revolutions, fighting in the mountains of Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan in the early 2000's, the recent Kyrgyz massacre. If we analyze the situation from the point of view of overseas strategists, the region of Central Asia is the best suited for carrying out an attack on Russia's strategic interests - the local instability is quite comparable with the Middle East.

How can we avoid complicating the situation in the region? Let us quote the words of the famous writer and publicist Nikolai Starikov: “The only way to restore stability in Central Asia is to restore a single country ... Integration is, or reunion, whatever you want, so call it. Russia still in the 19 century brought peace, order, and prosperity to Central Asia. In addition to her to do it just no one. The West has always more "carried away", and not brought. He is interested in the bowels, not people. The Russian civilization is arranged differently ... ”To everything that they now claim, and that they had and have, the peoples of Central Asia, they, one way or another, are obliged to Russia, to the Russian presence. Of course, this presence was multiplied by the hospitable centuries-old culture of the Kazakhs, Uzbeks, Turkmen, as a result we had a great country. And what do we have now, proudly speaking about our independence?

The consolidation of the countries of the region around Moscow is the key to its stable development, which opens up tremendous opportunities for the peoples of Central Asia, who are even hard to imagine. And the fact that no matter what is being done by the current leaders of our countries, first of all, Putin and Nazarbayev, the Customs Union, the CES, the SCO, the CSTO are steps in the right direction, towards the revival of the Empire, no matter how pathetic it may sound. We simply have no other way.
18 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    28 October 2011 09: 45
    Central Asia - one of the most explosive regions of the planet

    True events in Kyrgyzstan confirmed this
  2. nnnnnnnnn
    +4
    28 October 2011 12: 46
    The article is messy, smearing snot. The kings of the Russian Empire perfectly understood what Central Asia was for Russia, as well as the leaders of the USSR, but in the 90s Russia not only betrayed Russian interests, but Russians in this region. CU, CSTO, T "G? So Nazarbayev spoke about this at all meetings within the CIS or in bilateral meetings with Russia. In 1991, Nazarbayev had the idea to create an army of the Republic of Kazakhstan together with the Russian Federation, to keep two strategic divisions in Zhangiz-Tobe and Derzhavinsk (armed with "Satan") on the territory of Kazakhstan under the jurisdiction of the Russian Federation, On the basis of the 40th army of the USSR deployed on the territory of the Republic of Kazakhstan, create joint armed forces and with the right of citizens of the Republic of Kazakhstan to undergo military service on the territory of the Russian Federation (by the way, all this is written in the book of General Nurmagambetov the first The Ministry of Defense of the Republic of Kazakhstan, who sat with these proposals in Yeltsin's reception room for three days, Yeltsin did not receive the delegation) and this meant that the Republic of Kazakhstan was then ready to create a full-blooded union state with the Russian Federation, you just look at Kazakhstan, one of the CIS states that celebrates independence in December As a result, a holy place is never empty, Kazakhstan, as the poorest state in the USSR, after that there was only Tajikistan, there was nothing to do but crawl out of the pit itself to lookmoney all over the world, well, and then you know the leaders have felt the taste of money and us ... for all unions, etc.
    1. Ivan35
      +4
      28 October 2011 20: 02
      I support nnnnnnnn that the article is not very. and the facts all nnnnnnn correctly leads
      In the article, the author focuses on the "strange policy of Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan" - and I think the guilty are the Russian crap - who threw Central Asia - and that it was absolutely mean and treacherous, and Kazakhstan - threw both Kazakhs and their own Russians - probably because many crap were not quite Russian

      And Nazarbayev spoke out and fought against the collapse of the Union - and then consistently for unification
      And when they threw it — as you know, Kazakhstan was the last country that did not leave the USSR — it’s called one in an empty room — that’s why I survived as I could — I live here and I can say that the republic was raised — life is normal now — cannot be compared with the horrors of the 90s
      And there is interethnic agreement here - this is not a "Nazarbayev myth" - unlike Russia - where, unfortunately, there are incomparably more such problems - right up to the war
  3. svvaulsh
    +1
    28 October 2011 13: 05
    The essence of the article in the last sentence is set out. Another PR of Putin, covered by the problem of Central Asia. I am surprised that it is not written by Samson.
  4. sol
    0
    28 October 2011 14: 08
    It is necessary to unite, but why at first the author wrote about the exodus of the Russian population from Kazakhstan is not clear. In fact, few have been leaving recently, but on the contrary, there are even hackers.
    1. Ivan35
      -1
      28 October 2011 20: 08
      I agree with you that I am angry, Nazarbay spoke recently - he cited figures (with pride, moreover) that 46 Russians returned back
      And they left mainly due to economic reasons.
      And now those who are against integration and pour water on the enemy’s mill are discussing the topic of the national question - we must already forget this and better discuss the problem of blacks in Pendostana or Arabs in France
      1. +1
        28 October 2011 22: 11
        Why did you return? Maybe because they did not receive it properly? Have you ever been in the place of a man whom officials play?
        1. Ivan35
          -1
          29 October 2011 18: 13
          As I understand it, they could not get a job - they were leaving because of the crisis - there was no work either - and then in Kazakhstan the recovery went faster - and jobs appeared - secondly, many military men returned - since the salary and security were better than in Russia
  5. lightforcer
    0
    28 October 2011 19: 03
    the revival of the Empire, however pathetic it may sound. We simply have no other way.


    Pathos and stupid. Empire means monarchy and conquest.
    1. -2
      28 October 2011 22: 12
      This is where did I find such a definition? Oh, m ...
      1. lightforcer
        0
        28 October 2011 22: 18
        And what do you think? Make people laugh and write about the Russian Empire, where the peasants tore only violets, and then the Bolsheviks came and taught them how to shit.
      2. lightforcer
        -1
        28 October 2011 22: 21
        But what, right?
  6. +2
    28 October 2011 22: 08
    Snot, not snot ... The essence of the article in the revival of the Empire. After the revolution of the 17th year, after the signing of the Brest-Litovsk peace treaty, which the Bolsheviks had to agree to, the country lost part of its territory. After World War II, Stalin almost returned the USSR to the borders of the Russian Empire. In 1991, almost the same thing happened. The country is a mess, the people are uncontrollable, almost CHAOS. The national suburbs decided to separate, a handful of small-town princes got rid of the guardianship of the Central government. I have lived all my life in Uzbekistan, once a year now I visit relatives in Tashkent. And I know firsthand how people live there. I know how they used to live in the same POWER. All these princes (Karimov, Kravtsov, Shushkevich and the like) were pathologically afraid of inspections and commissions from Moscow. And ordinary people had the opportunity to get protection from the arbitrariness of these princes. So everyone got rid of the custody of the Center for their own ambitions. But the people remained abandoned. I am a Korean by nationality, a native of Tashkent, Russian in spirit and education ... I, like everyone, was brought up in Russian literature, Russian poetry, was educated in a Soviet school as a patriot of my homeland with its capital in Moscow. Now I live and work in Sochi. And in fact, I think that enough to enjoy independence is not clear from what. It is time to restore what was ruined.
  7. -5
    28 October 2011 22: 22
    question: should these savages (see in the article on the new generation's knowledge of the Russian language) be added back? To feed them again (we and the North Caucasus have enough) to build something for them, etc. ??? They, ungrateful creatures, began to consider themselves "titular nations" (???), although apart from the Uzbeks, their civilizational deeds (before the arrival of the Russians) were reduced to the invention of the yurt. They can only be exploited (in 1991 it was a fashion brand in Asia, that the Russians used them as a colony, it was time to implement the brand), but not take them into Russia. Under Alexander III, the annexation was necessary because of the "Great Game" with England + the elimination of bandit khanates, emirates, etc., living in raids on Russia, and now it is enough to economically fasten.
  8. zczczc
    0
    29 October 2011 01: 26
    We need to more clearly and concretely formulate the conditions for the reintegration of the Union.
    The whole article.
  9. nnnnnnnnn
    -3
    29 October 2011 13: 14
    What the hell is an empire revival? Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan can join so they have no problems 90% of the adult population plows in the Russian Federation and Kazakhstan, and Kazakhstan is unlikely to have other people.
  10. Uncle Sam
    -2
    29 October 2011 21: 24
    what is the point of the empire? why laugh, raska - wretchedness is complete, empire is shabby
  11. Tolia
    0
    30 October 2011 16: 35
    Russia, as a truly Central Asian country, should recognize itself as such, and then it really will have a chance to integrate at least someone, namely the Central Asian republics that are close to it in terms of their political structure and mentality.
  12. ballian
    0
    30 October 2011 23: 27
    As I understand it, everyone was dreaming about joining Churkistan?
    In general, it's funny, against the background of how the Nazis are now marching on Russian marches with the slogans "enough to feed the Caucasus", and yelling that the chock-guest workers should be driven out of Russia is a typical schizophrenia of "imperialists".
  13. atomic
    0
    8 January 2013 16: 46
    While such articles will be printed, someone will always have their own gesheft.