Malaysian authorities say that a fragment of the Boeing that disappeared in March 2014 was found on Reunion

July 31 2015 60

Malaysian Deputy Transport Minister Abdul Aziz Kapraoui said that a piece of aircraft found on the shores of Reunion Island (a colony of France in the Indian Ocean) belongs to the very same Boeing-777, which disappeared in March 2014. This is a flight MH-370 - Kuala Lumpur - Beijing.

Malaysian authorities say that a fragment of the Boeing that disappeared in March 2014 was found on Reunion

It should be recalled that a few days ago, fishermen on Reunion discovered a piece of aircraft, which was chosen by hundreds of mollusks, which proved its long stay in the water. After inspecting the island, the local gendarmerie did not find any other wreckage of the aircraft, but allegedly stated that it had found a bottle of detergent with inscriptions in Malay. On the TV channel BFM stated that the bottle may have nothing to do with the wreck found on Reunion, but the Malaysian Minister of Transport said that the piece “on 100% belongs to Boeing, which disappeared in March, because the corresponding serial number was found on it”.

The Independent writes that in this way "conspiracy theory was exposed." We are talking about the version according to which the aircraft could be on the American military base Diego Garcia or even in the area of the Baikonur cosmodrome (Kazakhstan).

Meanwhile, the French authorities today sent a piece for examination from Reunion to Toulouse.

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

Dezinto

+24

31 July 2015 16: 28

Does a piece of iron float for a year and be washed ashore?

I'm still a supporter of theories ...
1. Lord of the Sith
  
  +25
  
  31 July 2015 16: 35
  
  I would take the increased seashells for examination, you can make an analysis of what part of the world's oceans they can be found. Water and habitat are different everywhere.
  1. Baikonur
    
    +8
    
    31 July 2015 16: 37
    
    This is a version according to which the plane could be at the American military base Diego Garcia or even in the area cosmodrome "Baikonur" (Kazakhstan).
    Generally - nishtyak!
    They also said on the news that the suitcase had surfaced!
    1. dmi.pris1
      
      +1
      
      31 July 2015 18: 28
      
      In general, a wonderful option to arrange our space center at the Amer’s base ...
      Quote: Baikonur
      This is a version according to which the plane could be at the American military base Diego Garcia or even in the area cosmodrome "Baikonur" (Kazakhstan).
      Generally - nishtyak!
      They also said on the news that the suitcase had surfaced!
    2. torp
      
      0
      
      31 July 2015 21: 47
      
      Gypsies took the suitcase!
    3. SeAl2014
      
      0
      
      1 August 2015 08: 18
      
      Baikonur, Russia, Putin .... Again, these Russians shot down a Boeing. Maybe they had a very warship there in the ocean. You give the UN investigation of the Russian trace!
      1. sgazeev
        
        0
        
        1 August 2015 14: 32
        
        I suspect the paddling pool, they shot down and buried, clamped coxae, rednecks. It's time to organize a tribunal.
  2. Grandfather bear
    
    +7
    
    31 July 2015 16: 43
    
    a fragment of the Boeing that disappeared in March 2014 was found on Reunion
    
    Why is it so shy?
    Not contagious yak?
    According to gruffland, Bobing is still not a rumor, but here rrrraz! And they said! Rrrraz and found out! And not what you closed and secret consequences!
    Interesting yes ?!
  3. APASUS
    
    +5
    
    31 July 2015 18: 10
    
    Quote: Lord of the Sith
    I would take the increased seashells for examination, you can make an analysis of what part of the world's oceans they can be found. Water and habitat are different everywhere.
    
    If a person was able to turn off most of the Boeing 777 aircraft transponders and leave the tracking zone of military locators, then I think I’ll guess how to arrange another riddle with the appearance of shells, for example, from a freshwater zone.
    The main obstacle in this tragedy is time. Now only a random geographic vessel scanning the bottom under the next cable can for example accidentally give answers to questions about the place of the disaster.
  4. torp
    
    +1
    
    31 July 2015 21: 48
    
    Where do seashells come from in Baikonur?
2. The comment was deleted.
3. evil partisan
  
  +4
  
  31 July 2015 16: 36
  
  Quote: DEZINTO
  I'm still a supporter of theories ...
  
  Are there any options?
  1. sgazeev
    
    +2
    
    1 August 2015 14: 54
    
    http://vse-krugom.ru/upavshij-na-ukraine-boeing-777-byl-podstavnym/ Ссылка о первых предположениях о сбитом самолёте.
    1. Shurik70
      
      +1
      
      1 August 2015 23: 51
      
      Quote: sgazeev
      http://vse-krugom.ru/upavshij-na-ukraine-boeing-777-byl-podstavnym/ Ссылка о первых предположениях о сбитом самолёте.
      
      O F I G E T b! ! !
4. Styx
  
  +2
  
  31 July 2015 17: 19
  
  I support, also such a thought pursues
5. Revolver
  
  +4
  
  31 July 2015 18: 14
  
  Quote: DEZINTO
  A piece of iron floats a year
  
  A piece of aluminum with air cavities inside.
  
  Quote: DEZINTO
  and thrown ashore?
  So the currents and winds ordered.
  
  Quote: DEZINTO
  I'm still a supporter of theories ...
  Your right is now not 37 years old.
  1. Gilev georgy
    
    0
    
    2 August 2015 12: 39
    
    There are sealed cavities, deliberately so as not to drown, right?)
6. dmi.pris1
  
  +3
  
  31 July 2015 18: 26
  
  Well, it’s kind of ....: An ax is floating along the river from the village of Kukuev. Yes, well, let a piece of iron float for itself ... In short, it was found, it brought in a wave. It is clear that they died without theories, they just were not looking there.
  Quote: DEZINTO
  Does a piece of iron float for a year and be washed ashore?
  
  I'm still a supporter of theories ...
7. Rus2012
  
  +2
  
  31 July 2015 19: 23
  
  Quote: DEZINTO
  I'm still a supporter of theories ...
  
  on 100% it belongs to the Boeing that disappeared in March, since the corresponding serial number was found on it
  
  ... well, in the first place they did not find the serial number on the wreck, but there is, as it were, part of the partnumber, i.e. the individual number of the part item is B777go, and hell knows them riveted.
  
  Secondly, who prevented from "breaking off" a piece of the wing and bury it in the right place?
  
  Therefore, I do not believe it!
  Too many naglo-Saxons "misled" the good-natured ...
  1. SRC P-15
    
    0
    
    31 July 2015 19: 38
    
    Quote: Rus2012
    Secondly, who prevented from "breaking off" a piece of the wing and bury it in the right place?
    
    And what if he was "reclaimed" from a Boeing shot down over Ukraine? Immediately upon the arrival of the wreckage in the Netherlands, this part of the wing was transported to the Indian Ocean. Then the question is understandable why the investigation is dragging on for so long: the Americans needed time for the fragment to take the form it should have after a long stay in the ocean. I am still inclined to the version that this is the same plane. The Americans are hastily covering their tracks.
    By the way: did they do the calculation of the found parts of the Boeing in the Netherlands?
    1. Rus2012
      
      +4
      
      31 July 2015 19: 57
      
      Quote: СРЦ П-15
      By the way: did they do the calculation of the found parts of the Boeing in the Netherlands?
      
      With a full calculation of all the assembled parts - No!
      Details (material evidence) -selected selectively.
      This is one of the worst, if not tougher, violations of the investigation ...
      The second jamb of the investigation is that material evidence dared (!?) "Cut" (count - destroy material evidence) for ease of transportation ...
      1. SRC P-15
        
        +2
        
        31 July 2015 20: 08
        
        Quote: Rus2012
        Details (material evidence) -selected selectively.
        
        Maybe they were "selected selectively" just for their own needs, and not for investigation?
        And they cut the evidence rather than for transportation to the Netherlands, but so that it could be delivered, as discreetly as possible, to Malaysia.
        I think they will find more debris soon. It cannot be that the Americans are not safe.
        
        The comment was deleted.
        
        sgazeev
        
        +1
        
        1 August 2015 14: 46
        
        http://vse-krugom.ru/upavshij-na-ukraine-boeing-777-byl-podstavnym/Упавший на Украине Boeing-777 был подставным.1. В Марте 2014 бесследно пропал аналогичный Boeing-777
        The Boeing 777 Malaysia Airlines, flying from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing with 227 passengers and 12 crew members, including one passenger from Russia, disappeared from the radar screens on the night of March 8. Before that, he did not give any signals about problems. The last time the aircraft crew contacted 220 km from the east coast of Malaysia. Most likely, he was distilled to an American or NATO military base.
        Source: http://vse-krugom.ru/upavshij-na-ukraine-boeing-777-byl-podstavnym/
8. Gilev georgy
  
  0
  
  2 August 2015 12: 01
  
  As soon as mh17 was shot down in Ukraine, I immediately thought about the "disappeared" Malaysian Boeing.
Ze Kot

+1

31 July 2015 16: 40

On TV, the proposed route was shown. The direction is the southern part of the Indian Ocean.
svp67

+3

31 July 2015 16: 41

One fragment is not the whole plane, and a fragment that is not informative, so when the "black boxes" are found, then it may be possible to reveal this secret.
kil 31

+1

31 July 2015 16: 42

It seems they said they found a colored chip, it should be chrome plated. The number found on it simply belongs to the same Boeing model. So let them make requests for factories, which plant produced the spare part and which Boeing was delivered. The Minister of Transport needs to do his own thing, and not arrange a show in front of the press.
1. clidon
  
  +3
  
  31 July 2015 19: 16
  
  The rooms on the details are unique. That is, it is a specific part for a particular machine.
  1. Rus2012
    
    +2
    
    31 July 2015 19: 30
    
    Quote: clidon
    The rooms on the details are unique.
    
    There are a partnumber, i.e. it’s just the part number of the B777 part, and their weight is riveted ...
    
    By the way, not so far from Diego Garcia ...
    
    PS: all very reminds virgin whole
    passports of "terrorists from liners" 09.11 on the ruins of "twins"
    1. clidon
      
      +2
      
      1 August 2015 00: 02
      
      By the way, not so far from Diego Garcia ...
      
      "Not far" is 2,4 thousand kilometers. Similarly, we can say that flight MH17 was shot down near Moscow. Just six hundred kilometers.
  2. kil 31
    
    +4
    
    31 July 2015 19: 45
    
    Quote: clidon
    The rooms on the details are unique. That is, it is a specific part for a particular machine.
    
    You are a little wrong, a specific part for a particular machine begins to be considered, documents when the aircraft leaves the fully assembled workshop and passes the tests. Because when testing it is necessary to change the nodes, not only we have a marriage. Part of the letter is what model, part of which plant (if they have several), part when produced. Then it’s simple, you make a request for a complete assembly plant and they will provide complete information there everything is registered, in case of a catastrophe it will be clear which plant or which assembly shop is to blame. Remember WWII search engines, even in those days everything was numbered. Having found at least a part of the chassis, they easily determine from the archives when, where, which squadron was made, and who was at the helm.
    1. sabakina
      
      +2
      
      31 July 2015 22: 04
      
      Well, well ... It's like in the Union, one thread from socks, you could find out where these socks were made ... But did you see that each pair of socks would be given a separate number according to the nomenclature and who bought them? that is, you just recognize the place of production and nothing more ...
    2. Dizzpet
      
      0
      
      31 July 2015 22: 17
      
      I apologize, minus accidentally pressed. wanted a plus ...
Abbra

+1

31 July 2015 16: 44

Tossed up with Chumadan ... I do not believe. The thing is dark ...
1. Styx
  
  +1
  
  31 July 2015 17: 25
  
  especially there is a darkish group of American programmers who disappeared with the airplane. And the company to which they belonged also seems to be sooooo dark. Indeed, for some reason, the sun was digging the earth right down to the core of the earth in search of this bird
Begemot

0

31 July 2015 16: 52

I also do not trust that
"conspiracy theory exposed."
. the plane can be banged into the ocean in a couple of days or months, it will also collapse and grow into shells.
Yuyuka

+9

31 July 2015 16: 57

Mystic!!! How he sailed on time !! moreover with a suitcase! This is a SIGN!
Bottles of Chinese water came after him ... there are still not enough noodles and the dish is ready! tokmo ears substitute
NordUral

+9

31 July 2015 17: 06

And how on time this fragment surfaced ... What with the missing side, what with the downed (exploded) - some puzzles and inconsistencies. If you drop the conspiracy theory. And if you don’t discard it, then the missing board with dead passengers was blown up or shot down over New Russia (this was indicated in the first days after the fall of МН17). Where are the relatives of the victims. Something I did not notice in the amount corresponding to the number of victims of the disaster? So conspiracy theories are often true.
1. Dezinto
  
  +14
  
  31 July 2015 17: 21
  
  So conspiracy theories are often true.
  
  Easily. Like nefig nafig.
  
  And for the most part, people are convinced that they are honestly telling them everything about the world .... I have skepticism about this.
Chicot 1

0

31 July 2015 17: 16

Malaysian authorities say that a fragment of the Boeing that disappeared in March 2014 was found on Reunion

The Independent writes that in this way "a conspiracy theory is exposed." We are talking about a version according to which the plane could be at the American military base Diego Garcia or even in the area of the Baikonur cosmodrome (Kazakhstan)

One strange thing ... They were looking for him at the time they were looking for him. Many searched ... For a long time ... And to no avail ... And here again !!! and it was found ... Mutnenko however all ...
1. clidon
  
  +2
  
  31 July 2015 19: 22
  
  It was found because a small fragment was thrown and thrown ashore.
mig31

0

31 July 2015 17: 21

I don’t even know how to condole - Kingdom of Heaven!?, Or Kingdom of Neptune!?, God bless us all, I don’t know who and for whom. Amen! ! !!!
Monster_Fat

+7

31 July 2015 17: 24

Well, actually, the fragment is not metal, but fiberglass-composite. Yes, do not be surprised, it is this type of "Boeing" - composite. But the fact that he turned out to be alone, without other debris, is strange. Oh, yes, for those who will not believe, there is also a "suitcase" with "one piece" things. It is "one".
Obviously, the CIA’s budget is being cut down considerably or ... this budget is being stolen very much ... Or maybe ... the natives let the rest of the plane sailing to their island onto their huts and flaunt their clothes found in other luggage suitcases and bags ...
1. clidon
  
  +2
  
  31 July 2015 19: 21
  
  Why be surprised? Iron drowned, the composite floats. And with other debris in the form of a suitcase and, possibly, bottles of water, which they also found. And so swept away by storms and winds it is difficult to search.
2. Rus2012
  
  +1
  
  31 July 2015 19: 47
  
  Quote: Monster_Fat
  ... Oh, yes, for those who will not believe, there is also a "suitcase" with "one piece" things. It is "one".
  Obviously, the CIA’s budget is being cut significantly
  
  ... most importantly, not so far from Diego Garcia! :)))))
  Less on logistics, more on your pocket!
sabakina

+4

31 July 2015 17: 24

Well, here’s the piano in the bushes, that is, a chip in the water was drawn according to the script ... I wonder what Stanislavsky would say about this?
VoenDok

+1

31 July 2015 17: 44

I bet that a catastrophe will be investigated faster than the second Malaysian Boeing, which crashed a week later over the DPR
1. clidon
  
  +1
  
  31 July 2015 19: 18
  
  Most likely, if it finds something, it’s still fragments that also wander in the form of garbage on the surface of the ocean. The catastrophe itself can be thousands of kilometers away.
Olegater

0

31 July 2015 18: 02

And like all the time. Chumadan Chip allegedly a previously missing plane pops up after trying to arrange a trial over RUSSIA by a downed twin bastard by the Khokhlopurdukas at the direction of a louse. The chip was provided so that in the future the Russian side would not have evidence of the criminal activity of the euro and pindo p.e.de.r.a.s.t.o.v. Namely, that the plane shot down near Donetsk is the same - or the missing one was first abducted by the ami and the purpose of the abduction or further provocations as a downed one or passengers of their own value.
fa2998

0

31 July 2015 18: 22

Quote: The Cat
On TV, the proposed route was shown. The direction is the southern part of the Indian Ocean.

NOTHING NEW! In a year, the debris could swim thousands of miles. There is no crash site - of course "black boxes" are not available.
DMB3000

+1

31 July 2015 18: 48

Quote: DEZINTO
Does a piece of iron float for a year and be washed ashore?

I'm still a supporter of theories ...

they said the same. It is made of composite soft materials.
kg pv

+1

31 July 2015 19: 41

Quote: VoenDok
I bet that a catastrophe will be investigated faster than the second Malaysian Boeing, which crashed a week later over the DPR

Actually, there is a difference from March to July ...
sir_obs

+6

31 July 2015 19: 56

It’s strange that it’s not in the Moskva River. A suitcase with a wing floated
1. svp67
  
  0
  
  31 July 2015 19: 58
  
  Quote: sir_obs
  It’s strange that it’s not in the Moskva River. A suitcase with a wing floated
  
  It’s not autumn yet ... it seems then the Dutch are going to make a PRELIMINARY report ...
  1. Rus2012
    
    +1
    
    31 July 2015 20: 05
    
    Quote: svp67
    It’s not autumn yet ... it seems then the Dutch are going to make a PRELIMINARY report ...
    
    ... I think they are afraid to make it or voice it (according to the curators of the case). For it is not known what will come up in response ...
    And "UPPLY" CAN DO A LOT, for many people witnessed:
    - Germans from NATO, who were conducting exercises at that time (and "all drawing and writing" what was around).
    - Radar recording of the situation of our air defense.
    - "involved" from the ruin can speak and present the docks (especially if you offer "protection and future")
    1. svp67
      
      +1
      
      31 July 2015 20: 16
      
      Quote: Rus2012
      ... I think they are afraid to make it or voice it (according to the curators of the case). For it is not known what will come up in response ...
      
      The fact that we have SOMETHING that we can "cover" any accusations with is not a fact, although even the very threat of its presence already frightens our opponents, that's why "reconnaissance in force" is going on, in all sorts of ways, including provocations, they try to understand how much information we own.
      And all the rest, including the Germans, can simply be silenced. Moreover, the Germans have their own great interests in this conflict.
      And something tells me that a lot of interesting things are in the recordings of conversations of dispatchers of Dnepropetrovsk with the board. I won’t be surprised at their appearance on the net closer to the fall ..
iouris

+1

31 July 2015 21: 34

A strange state is this Malaysia. And why no one asked to create an international tribunal on this issue?
1. sabakina
  
  +3
  
  31 July 2015 22: 13
  
  Quote: iouris
  A strange state is this Malaysia. And why no one asked to create an international tribunal on this issue?
  
  It is difficult to refuse to run for beer when asked to buy one can, and give money for three ...
Radical

+2

31 July 2015 21: 57

Quote: iouris
A strange state is this Malaysia. And why no one asked to create an international tribunal on this issue?

That's when information appears that the plane was shot down by the Americans in the area of their naval base on Diego Garcia Island, and then the question can be raised.
provincial

0

1 August 2015 08: 52

What will they turn to the Security Council to create an international tribunal?
1. iouris
  
  0
  
  1 August 2015 22: 51
  
  I am sure: they themselves will not turn. But family members of passengers have every reason to have complaints against the carrier, which too often turns out to be a participant in strange air accidents with the deaths of hundreds of people, and to the investigation authorities.
  It can be statistically proved that two strange accidents in half a year with airplanes of the same type of one airline are almost an incredible coincidence. It’s like when firing at 20 km with two shells the second shell gets into the funnel from the first shell.
Signaller

0

1 August 2015 18: 40

First, in my opinion, the beach cleaner found it, not the fishermen.
The second seems to believe that this is a piece of Boeing's flaperon.
The third - apparently the board went into the water smoothly, on the last drops of kerosene. There is no fuel spot from here and the hull didn’t fall apart, but drowned gently with the entire crew and pesengers. Only easily connected elements came off in the form of the same flaperons.
Fourth, according to the box, they said that the pilot had large debts to the bank for a loan. Perhaps he decided to take his own life scores. The disaster analogy in the Alps that year.