Military Review

Ammunition for "Almaty" and "Kaolition-SV" will be tested at the Nizhny Tagil test site

21
The landfill of the Nizhny Tagil Metal Testing Institute (NTIIM) was reequipped for testing ammunition intended for machines on the Armata platform and self-propelled Coalition installations, reports TASS report of the Institute Director General Nikolai Smirnov.

Tank "T-90MS" at the site of the Nizhny Tagil Metal Testing Institute

“We are participating in ammunition testing tank Armata and Coalition-SV installations. Now we will re-equip the firing range for firing from 30 to 50 km. The equipment that can record the test results for hundreds of parameters - external and internal ballistics, range, accuracy, speed, we are in working condition "- said Smirnov.

He noted that "due to the increase in the state defense order this year, the number of firing from the institute has increased several times." According to the director general, “the whole range of artillery weapons and ammunition of medium and large caliber, unguided rockets, multiple rocket launchers and aerial bombs are being tested at the test site.” In 2014, more than 2-x thousand shots were fired.

Help Agency: “STIIM is the base organization of the Ural-Siberian Center of the Russian Academy of Rocket and Artillery Sciences. The institute’s test facility is considered the most equipped in the ammunition industry, and its 1,5 combat field per 50 km is the largest in the world. ”
Photos used:
TASS
21 comment
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. corn
    corn 27 July 2015 15: 50
    -10
    I can’t follow two articles about ammunition and baking text at once .. But I read very quickly, I immediately two ska
    1. corn
      corn 27 July 2015 15: 55
      -2
      I don't see the text I printed.
      1. inkass_98
        inkass_98 27 July 2015 16: 55
        +10
        Quote: corn
        And I read very bstroak-io at once two ska

        Yes, what for generally to read, it is better to press the comment right away.
        1. corn
          corn 27 July 2015 17: 11
          +5
          Quote: inkass_98
          Yes, what the hell to read,

          Personally, I need less than a minute to read this text. You somehow put up with people who simultaneously lift 250 kg on the bar or you can do it yourself, I don’t (it's about 250 kg).
          Just read about the new American shells, opened the site news. And here: Our shot and ripened here. It was a sin not to leave a comment on this. And the site for some reason does not allow this to be done normally.
          You shouldn't have believed what I read, and not for the sake of the "first night" right.
          1. Days
            Days 28 July 2015 01: 05
            0
            Oh well. But now you have checked the theory about the first comment.
  2. Snake AAA
    Snake AAA 27 July 2015 15: 54
    +3
    :))) and here is the answer to the previous news, I hope our shells will be a secret for everyone so that they do not come up with an antidote !!!
    1. just exp
      just exp 27 July 2015 16: 35
      +3
      There is a semi-antidote. because if even if it bypasses the DZ, then the maximum is a relic, and the new DZ will stand on the armature. Well, it’s worth considering that KAZ on armature will work on BOPS.
  3. Logical
    Logical 27 July 2015 15: 56
    -4
    О smile I asked the question five minutes ago, and the answer is already, promptly! It’s a pity there’s nothing concrete about the shells themselves. crying
    1. engineer74
      engineer74 27 July 2015 16: 08
      -7
      In the style of the "yellow" press: "To test the shells of the T-14" Armata "tank, a 50 km long range was needed!" fellow Draw your own conclusions ... wassat
      1. Logical
        Logical 27 July 2015 16: 23
        +6
        Quote: engineer74
        In the style of the "yellow" press: "To test the shells of the T-14" Armata "tank, a 50 km long range was needed!"

        Extremely, but the journalists gave the right information, you’re just a little inattentive smile
        “We are participating in the testing of ammunition for the Armata tank and the "Coalition-SV". Now we will re-equip the firing range for firing from 30 to 50 km.
        1. engineer74
          engineer74 27 July 2015 16: 33
          +4
          I noticed everything, I wanted to joke about what conclusions "humanitarians" journalists draw from such information, it seems unsuccessful ... sad
          1. Logical
            Logical 27 July 2015 16: 46
            +2
            Quote: engineer74
            seems unsuccessful ..

            It happens to everyone?!
    2. Cat man null
      Cat man null 27 July 2015 17: 32
      +1
      Quote: Logical
      It’s a pity there’s nothing concrete about the shells themselves. crying

      Do not change positions, you have already left laughing

      They are secret shells ... and will remain so for a long time.
      1. Logical
        Logical 27 July 2015 17: 40
        0
        Quote: Cat Man Null
        Do not change positions, you have already left

        What?
        Quote: Cat Man Null
        They are secret shells ... and will remain so for a long time.

        Shaw there to secret ??, the Americans outlined everything out there, but we, as always, everything is "secret", even needles for "filing" wassat
        1. Albert1988
          Albert1988 27 July 2015 21: 32
          0
          Quote: Logical
          Americans outlined everything in general

          The fact is that the described American shells began to be developed quite a long time ago and now their tests are coming to an end when everything was just beginning or was in full swing - everything was secretly healthy too, so after a year, another and our shells are more specific info will appear.
          1. Vohman
            Vohman 28 July 2015 02: 27
            0
            they are secret because there is nothing to write about ..
            there would be something innovative and unique - they would have painted in all the colors of the rainbow
            1. Cat man null
              Cat man null 28 July 2015 10: 25
              0
              Quote: Vohman
              there would be something innovative and unique - they would have painted in all the colors of the rainbow

              And this is said by the person whose profile says "System Analyst" belay

              "... what are you, nafig, tan-kist", inspired, call ..
              1. Vohman
                Vohman 28 July 2015 19: 16
                0
                Quote: Cat man null
                "... what are you, nafig, tan-kist", inspired, call ..


                Well, once inspired smile
                I'm certainly not a tanker, but in this case I was surprised by the statement:
                the tank itself is considered somewhat secret, but nevertheless it was rather actively presented in the media, on the Internet, and especially after the show. At the same time, we are still discussing, let’s say, still illusory technologies and operating modes, as well as performance characteristics, which, if they exist, are not worked out. This is if everything is in order.
                if you continue from far away, then the same thing was and is (although it has recently calmed down and is not easy - there are serious problems) with the PAK FA T-50. The same presentations, the same pathos, the same demonstrations in the media of a technological breakthrough, etc.
                I can also name offhand a couple of developments that have so far been heard about, but in reality are not visible (by and large). And again with the "declassification" of some "piquant" details wink What are the headlines like "The first reconnaissance and strike drone has been secretly developed in Russia" ... Why secretly? - Well, okay. But why are there no test demonstrations, as is done, for example, in the USA - they are not afraid that someone will see something too much, they demonstrate their capabilities. And not on paper, and not in words, but in a real demonstration of their real developments in action. And such actions really speak about something. And not "secret" ammunition, the work of which could simply be beautifully demonstrated in a short presentation video clip. Or not?

                So, the question is: Why did these developments actively advertise? Because they believed or believe that the technologies used in them, although not worked out to the end, can be implemented in the next 5-10 years. Go for other, not so transparent, reasons ..
                And I do not take into account that when advertising such serious projects, a certain amount of "not truth or half-truth" always exists for advertising purposes. The question is: Why did advertising of the same promising ammunition for Armata and the Coalition pass them by? Really, having "secret" developments (and developments) in this area, would not give some "advertising" information about them? After all, all these machines are worthless if there is no decent ammunition for them.

                Based on the established scheme in promoting its products of the military-industrial complex of the Russian Federation both on the external and domestic markets, I can assume that with these new ammunition, either everything is not all right, or development at the very initial stage, or it’s just wishful thinking - what do I incline first of all in this situation.
                My conclusions are based on the "habits" of advertising military products in the Russian Federation, even if not everything is working well yet, or "so far" does not even work! That's all. I did not offend anyone, I hope, with my reasoning in this matter (advertising).

                And thanks, Cat man null, and everyone elsethat paid attention to my profile hi I really am not a tanker.
                1. Styx
                  Styx 29 July 2015 12: 27
                  0
                  Link to NORMVideo at least one flight of the vaunted F-35, plyyyz! And then, panimash, the whole Internet was digging up and down, but I didn’t find the Fu-35, maybe I have some kind of Internet looped from the world? But there is still the F-22, the F-18 is not uncommon, and with 35 something is not rushing. Don’t refuse, throw the link here.
    3. Albert1988
      Albert1988 27 July 2015 21: 30
      0
      Quote: Logical
      It’s a pity there’s nothing concrete about the shells themselves.

      And as they say, secret information)))) and that's it)
  4. sv68
    sv68 27 July 2015 16: 04
    +1
    the length of the polygon is 50 km, and the maximum flight range of the coalition projectile is like 70ki? Where are the projectiles then going to be cast? and yet, could it be possible to simply conduct tests without a self-PR?
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 27 July 2015 16: 16
      +3
      And who said that the Coalition will fire 70 kilometers?
      1. sv68
        sv68 27 July 2015 16: 23
        +3
        Vadim 237, why then test the projectile without firing at its maximum range? Dispersion of projectiles, deviations at the maximum range and striking characteristics at the maximum range you already know in advance?
        1. Vadim237
          Vadim237 27 July 2015 18: 29
          +1
          Most likely, the self-propelled guns will shoot at a maximum range of 50 kilometers.
      2. Izotovp
        Izotovp 27 July 2015 16: 24
        +1
        There is such information ... that allegedly shot some kind of experimental shell ... while rumors
      3. EFRSTR
        EFRSTR 27 July 2015 17: 03
        +1
        Coalition! That sounds!
    2. Snake AAA
      Snake AAA 27 July 2015 16: 24
      +1
      ))) yeah spies with butterfly net, catch shells)))))
  5. Izotovp
    Izotovp 27 July 2015 16: 13
    +3
    The projectile will unfold at the border of the landfill so as not to violate reporting.
    1. Locksmith
      Locksmith 27 July 2015 18: 26
      +1
      and its battlefield measuring 1,5 by 50 km is the largest in the world


      In a spear, the battlefields are 200 * 200 km, and nothing takes a steam bath
  6. The comment was deleted.
  7. aleksandrs95
    aleksandrs95 27 July 2015 18: 16
    +2
    at the expense of 70km, information slipped past the coalition that there was an experimental shot from Pion. At that time the Coalition wasn’t there yet. But the question of the explosive power in the shell, of course it was not enough and guidance. and stomp at a range of 20 km. Work on all topics is proceeding positively, but the question is when will the finished product and its price? Excalibur with 100000 went to 70000 and with a large batch of data there will reach 50000. This will be a big fight.