We will end badly, and our children will be jealous of how we lived. We are controlled by puppets. Who benefits from war? ("Parlamentnilisty.cz", Czech Republic)
The European Union expects the same fate that befell Ancient Egypt, says famous Czech lawyer Miroslava Hustáková to the portal ParlamentníListy.cz. After the collapse of the EU, she said, we will find ourselves in a good company. Our politicians, whom she calls the puppets of those in power, should not forget that the Czechs are descendants of the Hussites and can again arrange a defenestration.
ParlamentníListy.cz: It's been seven years since the beginning of a massive economic crisis that began with the collapse of American banks. During this time, critics of the current system tried with the help of such actions as Occupy Wall Street to convince the public that billionaires and “banksters” rob people with the help of the financial system. Many professionals, such as the former Greek Minister of Finance and Economist Varoufakis, have branded the financial system as something based on bubbles, on the dominance of dollars and on the constant decrease in real wages. What have we come to in this discussion about modern capitalism over the past seven years? What to say about the success of the concepts of capitalism, globalization and the free market? And what is their future, like the future of the economic organization of the world?
Miroslav Gustakova: The world is developing unevenly, and according to what conditions exist in a given territory. Socialism brought a lot of positive to ordinary people, but still lost in competition with capitalism. Why - it is clear. Humanity as a whole and man as a person in their essence have preconditions for development, for knowledge. If this basic principle of life begins to be suppressed, then restrictions will be possible as long as there is some worthy substitute. For example, a guarantee of employment, provision in old age, in illness, free education and others. Unreasonable restrictions, such as travel abroad, are unacceptable for human nature. If you want to know what awaits you, refer to the causes of the death of past civilizations, which were at one time the most progressive. Everything is simple: most often they were destroyed by the violation of one of the main principles of the harmonious development of mankind. People took to the detriment of others more than they needed, and the management of these possessions led to the dominance of the bureaucracy, which hampered the further development of the whole society. And since the carps themselves will not lower their pond, for them it was made by those who were the most advanced at that time.
A typical example is the end of the golden age in Egypt, when after the death of Queen Hatshepsut and the assassination of Vizier Hapuseneb, Thutmoses III came to power, who had so far violated strict property and spiritual laws that ensured the prosperity of all of Egypt. Everything was based on the fact that God gave them this land, which they should manage and protect well, and other territories should interest them only as neighbors. The successful expansive wars of Thutmosis III brought the occupied territories, where the Egyptians, however, did not seek to move, and managing lands with subdued peoples demanded such expenses that the growing bureaucracy stopped the development of Egypt itself. The same thing happens today. Under the pretext of protecting human rights, European values, promoting democracy, developed countries seek to subdue those who are less developed, dictate what is good for them, and force them to do something that no one would voluntarily do. This disharmony takes a lot of energy - costs that are sometimes higher than the profits from parasitism on the weaker. This principle of the EU violates long ago, and, unfortunately, the end will be the same as those who made this mistake in the past. The bureaucracy has already reached such proportions that I am only waiting for the monthly quota for toilet paper to be reported to us. And the one who exceeds it will be obliged to pay a fine. Those who actually control the world economy know this fact and undoubtedly are preparing for the period of the collapse of the EU.
France, Italy, Austria, Slovakia, Hungary are good countries and we will be in good company. Poland, Romania, Hungary and Bulgaria have chosen a different path. NATO bases will not allow them to develop independently even after the collapse of the EU. Germany has not yet decided: look at George Friedman’s YouTube “Tell me what Germany will do, and I will tell you what Europe will look like in the next 20 years”. The rest of the world is on a more favorable economic path. The three-day summit of leaders of the BRICS and other countries in Ufa, recently ended and completely ignored by the Czech media, not only brought huge investments in the BRICS countries, but also demonstrated its readiness to connect other states. Bank BRICS will give the first loan in the spring of next year. I was surprised, for example, by Thailand, who wants to invest 600 million dollars in agriculture in the Russian Bashkortostan. India has signed oil supply agreements with Rosneft. Other major investments are expected from China. Pakistan and India expressed their desire to join the SCO. The Shanghai Cooperation Organization already today represents 1,6 billions of people without India. Successful was the Economic Forum in St. Petersburg. Russians will build 16 NPPs in Saudi Arabia. About the huge investments in 10 billions of dollars from Saudi Arabia to Russia, the channel ČT reported.
Given these gigantic projects, it is easy to imagine how important a third unit of the Temelin NPP is for Russia. Our citizens, thanks to the Czech media, may believe that the EU is the navel of the earth, but unfortunately this is not the case. The world has long been moving in a different direction, as evidenced by the fact that previously such loyal US partners like Saudi Arabia began to make huge deals with Russia, that Putin accepted an invitation from Japan, and the only one who still catches every word of the United States and playing out a comedy about Russia, the enemy, this is the EU. The world continues to evolve, and we are thinking about what to impose sanctions, so that instead of us, someone else will carry out transactions with Russia, even if the partners are loyal to the United States or even the United States themselves. The weakness and failure of European politicians will lead to the fact that Europe is no longer the hegemon of the developed world, although our country is likely to be among those who can develop independently.
- For many years, the concept of “war” has been associated almost by 100% with Russia. If we put aside the emotions and the "foam of days", what is the state of relations between Europe and Russia today? Was Ukraine just a misunderstanding, or was it the start of Russian aggression against Europe, or was there such an opinion, was it a deliberate step by the West to weaken Russia?
“If more and more funds are allocated from the state budget to the military-industrial complex, this must somehow be explained. That is, you must always create an enemy. Russia was a nuclear power under Yeltsin, that is, when there was complete lack of law there, the army decayed. But then nobody was afraid that some crazy general would send missiles to Europe? If Russia invites us to the Peace Security Conference, then many defense ministers from all over the world are sent there, but the supposedly peace-loving NATO ignores the invitation. Do you think that security can be ensured by refusing to communicate, negotiate with a partner, whom we openly call the enemy? Who paid for the Maidan in Kiev is probably already clear to everyone who wanted to know the truth. Even the “maydanovtsy” themselves complained that in the end they were not paid for some days.
Now about 2500 people are trying to do the same in Yerevan. In 2010, they also paid revolutionaries in Belarus Minsk. But then Lukashenko expelled the US ambassador because he grossly violated the Vienna Convention, which prohibits diplomats from interfering in the internal affairs of the host country. Several dozen people were sent to prison, who attacked the presidential palace. And all-Maidan ended. The desire to lure all the states of the former USSR or to surround Russia is obvious, and who does not see him, he will never see again.
- Russia is modernizing its armament, is increasing its military presence in the border areas. How can this end? It is believed that Russia will attack one of the countries of Europe. Friends of Russia, on the contrary, claim that it is the United States that is preparing a war ...
- A year ago, the politician Zhirinovsky called on the Russian government for the so-called “war of advance”. He reproached Putin for being the same as Alexander I and Stalin. Say, Russia always knows that it will be attacked, but, not wanting to be an aggressor, it does only what its partners force it to do: it gives in to attack, and as a result millions of people die. If, they say, Stalin would listen to advisers and move to Europe in the middle of June 1941, tens of millions of Soviet people would not have died. Then Putin immediately responded, saying that the opinion of Mr. Zhirinovsky and his personal views do not correspond to the position of the government. I wonder how this media of Zhirinovsky did not immediately take advantage of our media to scare the people of Russia, how it has been done for many years now.
War is needed to those who benefit from it. It is not surprising that people are already completely confused: no one is obliged to watch foreign servers from morning to evening in order to get at least some objective information. Even among university professors one can find giants of thought, who, even under socialism, claimed that World War II had seriously strengthened the economy of the USSR. At the Faculty of Law in Brno, I met one such scientist from the military department who taught us the subject of “Defense of the State”. Then I naively believed that he was checking our attentiveness, and joked that I didn’t understand why Stalin was in such a hurry to go to Berlin if he could continue to strengthen the economy for several more years. I had no idea that Mr. teacher is serious. I was very unpleasant. Fortunately, he began to tell everyone how he would deal with me in the exam, and I wrote a statement about the exam before the commission. Because of this, I was preparing for the exam much longer than my classmates. I had no idea how much trouble I had raised, and after successfully passing the exam, I had to promise the head of the course that I would be more restrained in my speeches. The truth is that it never happened to me. With this example, I wanted to show that there were always ambitious, educated fools, and if their situation allows you to be intimidated, then you should not be surprised that many people believe God knows what.
Russia will arm itself - NATO will not leave it alone with its bases around its territory. On the other hand, Russia is not in the top ten countries in terms of debt - the first United States with their 18,3 trillions of dollars. Russia has a normal debt of about 94 billion dollars. She has sources, and she needs Europe to buy raw materials from her. Our crisis affects it more negatively than a possible war. Who wants war, to whom it can be profitable, it becomes clear when parsing. It is clear that for Europe as a whole, including Russia, war cannot be profitable. Benefit is gained only by the state on whose territory there are no battles.
- We, if we talk about the defense of the country, rely on NATO. Is this a sufficient guarantee for our defense? What does our army, so reduced since joining NATO, need? What can our army protect us from? What is the danger of current and new forms of war? How should our country and its allies prepare for them?
- The Czech Republic is not better protected by treaties than during the period of the First Republic, and even then all this did not come in handy for us. Once I have already discussed in detail the agreements of that time in comparison with the current one with NATO on my page on the Internet, and our affairs are even slightly worse than before the Second World War. What happened to us then, we all know. So that story clearly indicates what can be with us today in the event of a conflict. A military alliance works in conditions of peace, and in the event of a war, countries behave as they currently benefit. So it was and always will be.
No one is obliged to help us in case of an attack. According to Art. 5 Washington Agreement, each of the NATO countries will decide whether to help or not. Any other interpretation that we hear from our politicians is a lie, like a lot of other lies. But solidarity does not work even today. Brussels decides that NATO will ignore the Peace Conference in Moscow, but all the same, the French and German defense ministers are sent to one of them and bring contracts to their countries. I do not believe in a regular war in Europe, as the majority understands it. But it is clear to me that there is a great desire to cause unrest, the purpose of which is to build new NATO bases, including in those countries where it has so far been possible to defend elementary sovereignty, particularly in the Czech Republic.
- The Russian threat is now surpassed by the so-called Islamic state, which destroys the states indicated on the world map, and instead of them establishes an order based on the most extreme interpretations of Islam. There is a map of the desired territory of the state that the IG wants: half of Africa, Western Asia, and Southern Europe. And some scholars say that Islam as such is obliged to conquer the world in its fundamentals. President Zeman compares the IG with Nazi Germany and encourages us to wake up. Does our world face serious danger from this expansive public entity?
- The Islamic state is very similar to Nazi Germany. But it is even more cruel. During the inspections of the concentration camps by the Red Cross, the Germans at least tried to create the impression that they were at least humane to the prisoners. They used the spiritual world thinner than the Islamic state, and in such a way that ordinary citizens did not even notice. They did not go to the masses with this, but used spiritually gifted people. Those who refused to serve them, they killed. Karel Weinfurter and Jan Kefer, for example, were removed from us this way, for example. The Islamic state, by contrast, enjoys the primitiveness and ignorance of believers. It uses for its own purposes the words of the Quran, which, however, can be found in any Holy Book, because they should be there. What, is it not written in the Bible that if you die for Jesus, you will live forever?
I hope they will not judge me if I explain why these words are written there. This message is mystical, not theological, and it tells us that those who follow the path of Truth, that is, self-knowledge, will survive the so-called mystical death, and its symbol is the cross. This has nothing to do with the actual death of a person in a form known to us. These are certain inner spiritual states of a person, which confirm that he has really embarked on a mystical path that will end in a mystical wedding. Yogis call this Samadhi, and Christian theologians, this statement from the Bible, which they understand as they can, is much more pleasant for others, arguing that those who believe in Jesus will go with him to heaven. I do not want to argue with this. Let everyone believe what he wants, if he does not harm others. Unfortunately, in the case of the Islamic state this is exactly the case. This is the open cruelty of the largest caliber that only a person can inflict on a person. For several years now, the legitimately elected president of Syria has been fighting the rebels that the US has supplied. Assad is not going to obey the United States, and those in turn are not interested in his mandate from its own citizens. There is a desire to eliminate it, and for this purpose Islamic radicals are used.
So what does Europe want? We do not have enough of Yemen, Iraq, Syria, Libya and other African countries? Will we allow this revolution to bring on barges to thousands of young guys who have good clothes, expensive mobiles and no passports? If there were politicians in the Czech Republic who put our country at such a risk, then in their place I would start to fear. The Czechs experienced not only February 1948 of the year and a well-prepared velvet revolution. We are descendants of the Hussites, who in the rooms where politicians of the time were, loved to open the windows.
“When we talk about the difference between Europe and the Islamic world, we note that if we Europeans have learned to live without God and faith, then religion intervenes in the life of Muslims in a very serious way, it supports them and makes them think that they are higher than us - those who do not have God, who instead of him alcohol, porn and stuff. Is this the correct interpretation?
- I do not agree with this interpretation. Anyone who is engaged in the spiritual world knows that he who does not recognize the faith of another does not have it himself. If you really are on a spiritual level, then you must respect that someone believes that there is no God. Why? Because every soul has the right to develop itself, to gain experience and to know the truth. If an unprepared person is told more truth than he is willing to hear, it is like pouring heavy liquid into a thin vessel. The vessel will burst. The same with people. They can only get as much information from the spiritual world as they are willing to accept. Otherwise, their ordinary world will collapse. If I knew 30 years ago that I know today, I would never marry, I would not have a daughter, and I would regret about everything I did and did not do before, if I wanted to live at all. About the Czechs say that we are the most atheistic people on Earth. But it is not. I consider my people one of the most spiritually developed nations, because thanks to Jan Hus, my people are looking for the truth without priests, who often mumble Bible passages without understanding their true content themselves. When I was still working in Brunthal, one nun told me that during prayer she left her body more than once, looked through buildings and did not understand what was being done with her. I explained to her that she was able to concentrate in the way that she was able to do after many years of yoga practice, and thus received an opportunity which is called contemplation. This is a great reward for her efforts, and I am surprised that this is not taught in the faculty of theology. She told me that she would not dare to mention that there.
- Migration is the central theme of modern times. For example, according to Professor Miroslav Bart (Miroslav Bárt), another million refugees will inevitably come to us, who are driven from Africa not by war, but by drought. Can this be asserted with confidence? And as long as Europe manages to deal with the current, much lower migration wave? Liberally oriented people blame society for not wanting to accept refugees and immigrants. They accuse society of insensitivity and even extremism. On the contrary, a significant part of the society makes it clear that it does not want to share its remaining resources, that it is afraid of culturally different migrants and Islamic radicalism, and that it does not want to “pull” poverty into Europe. Who is right?
- The recipe is one here. Let the liberals stop running around with banners of solidarity with the refugees, prepare rooms for them in their homes and take care of them. Your portal has already published many interviews with such people. So let them, like in that tale of Baba Yaga and Ivan, sit on a shovel and show how to climb into the oven. Since they are liberals, they cannot force others. They themselves should be an example and prove that they do it not for the money of another country or because of stupidity, but go for it because of mercy. Otherwise, as a personal victim, it can not be proved.
- With some exaggeration they say that as much information as a medieval person has received in his entire life, we receive in one day. Is it true that the flow of information about events around us is more intense than ever. And is it good? Do modern people know how to navigate the world better than, say, two or three generations before us? Do we know how to properly select information? Are we able to more correctly and more consciously relate to decisions in politics?
- The absolute majority of people in the elections decides the issue, guided not by reason, but by feelings - fear, first of all. The powers that be are aware of this, and this allows them to play the comedy, which they call democracy. This process was reviewed in detail by David Icke. Once having awakened fear in people before the country's debt grows to the detriment of the future, you can thoughtlessly make them choose the so-called rightists. If, instead of their third chakra, they turned on the brain, they would understand that they choose those who had previously placed the biggest debt on the country. And then people are unhappy with the government, so the puppets are changed. The next election campaign awakens the fear that unemployment will increase, people will not have social guarantees, and thanks to this, the so-called leftists win. This genius theater in this form arose in parallel with the development of capitalism. The old model, which worked for thousands of years, has ceased to organize, because it is impossible to manage the factories and engage in politics every day. Therefore, the capitalists put their people, who are given, above all financial, assistance in the election campaign, so that they would be chosen and started to serve. A witch begins when the puppets become so insatiable that one of the puppeteers is indignant and becomes on a par with them. Today, this is happening in the Czech Republic, and all who closely follow the events should see the helplessness of these puppets. One puppeteer directly in parliament is able to rein in the 280 puppets, which are called legislators.
As for the awareness of citizens, general education is not exactly improving: 30 years ago, a graduate just wouldn't have answered that Pushkin was the inventor of vodka. There is no interest in the education of people, because fools are easier to manage, and if you play on their ego: they say real intellectuals choose Karel, then half of Prague will put on an icon with his image. The biggest blessing for uncensored information is the internet. He has no boundaries, as evidenced by the fact that after each interview on your portal I receive letters of gratitude even from Slovakia. The Internet cannot be controlled like other media. Puppeteers do not like it, so they seek to limit it. We have not had this happen yet. People will be able to make the right decisions when most of them understand which comedy is involved in. So far, unfortunately, most of them argue that they are left or right, and vote accordingly.
- The role of political marketing and advertising as such is increasing. The psychological tricks that we do with them are becoming more and more ingenious. Is it easier for us, the generation fed up with information, to be “fooled”? How do you evaluate the work of the media in the modern world?
- Recently, at a festival in Karlovy Vary, one senior manager of the ČT channel talked about how stupid people we are if they think that the twin towers of September 11 were blown up. Like, if someone had written to them on Facebook that the elephants had broken the towers, they would have believed it. So he, unwittingly, gave two facts. He does not suspect that an intellectual should doubt everything, whereas a fool is always sure of everything. The second fact is that even state-owned media have lost credibility among the public, and no one believes them. This loan cannot be earned by stupid criticism of people who probably know a lot more about this issue than this publicist. Over the centuries, the Czechs have become accustomed to the fact that their bosses are lying, so we have an advantage over other nations. We are able to find ways to verify information. We listened to “Free Europe”, “Voice of America”, and now we are listening to Russian sources. The media is a lot, and they often rewrite each other, including utter nonsense. Sometimes the situation is not clear - there are many sources. Probably, to avoid completely false information is impossible. For example, I try to publish and translate on Facebook only those articles, in the veracity of which I am sure. But with all the caution it was several times already the case that I had to delete articles, because the reality turned out to be different.
- We live between the West and Russia. We experienced good and bad with both sides of the world. What should be our attitude towards Russia? We have those who claim that the Russians want, if not to attack us, then at least gradually bend under them, to spread the worst from us and to use for the division of Europe. Others argue that the future of Europe is in alliance with Russia, either because of Europe’s collective security, pan-Slavic ideas, or because Russia is part of BRICS, which is, in their opinion, the political-economic alliance of the future. Where is the truth?
- Europe will split itself from the inside and without the participation of Russia. I do not see my country as a vassal neither the United States, nor Russia, nor China. Soon we will have such an opportunity, and whether we use it or not is unclear. For the development of our country, it is necessary to take independent decisions on the basis of mutual benefit, and not the dictates of one of the powers to which we are subordinate. This is the basis for the normal existence of the Czech Republic and the lives of our children. In the history of Europe, three monarchies have always played leading roles: French, Austrian and Russian. If they could not agree, the war always began. The largest countries in the world can ignore a small country, and so they, in fact, do. And we, thanks to political puppets, have made room in the Russian market for other countries.
As for Russia, we are no longer talking about whether we want to deal with it, but about whether it wants to have something in common with us. The Czech Republic has no concept of independent development: the current political elite cannot have it. Politicians do not defend primarily the interests of the Czech Republic. Remember how the EU behaved when Canada introduced visas to us? Damage to the national interest of the government justifies the supposedly necessary solidarity, which, however, the member countries towards us do not have. On the contrary, they use our stupid servility in front of Brussels.
- And what about relations with Germany? Everything is already painful, and we should not be afraid of the Germans?
- On the axis of evil were Berlin, Rome and Tokyo. There is such a joke about Italian fascism. Czech asks Italians, how is it possible that Germans are reproached for war, but Italians are not? The Italian replies: "And we have already forgiven them." I, unlike Ukraine, do not see in Germany any open version of Nazism, much less that the government would close its eyes to this. Most likely, Merkel will be replaced, but I do not think that the other leadership will want war. Germany does not need it.
“After all that we have said about the world and the unfavorable tendencies in it, one might get the impression that future generations are only waiting for the bad. War, drought, need, the lag of our civilization from the East. As in 80, parents did not predict what had come to their children, it is just as difficult to do this today. Nevertheless, we will try. What will our life be in 20-30 years?
- Life is changeable. The Ptolemies in Egypt would also prefer to live in the past - during the golden age. Modernity has given us the past, and we do the future ourselves. We may disagree with this fact, be indignant, but this is so, and nothing can be done about it. I have good reason to fear that our children will envy how we lived. We do almost nothing to change this.
Since we have touched on the issue of future international alliances ... The United States invites Europe into an agreement in the TTIP (Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership - Ed.) That would consolidate a strong alliance. Russia, China, India and other countries joined forces in BRICS. What is the future of these alliances, and what does the US dollar expect? Where should we join our country? Is a world war threatening a possible multipolar world, or rather the world of several alliances?
I'm sorry, but the situation is against the United States and Europe. We are the most indebted part of the world. It is as foolish to despise others as to boast a BMW car in front of a Škoda driver, having a loan around your neck and not having money to pay it. Sooner or later, BMW will be taken away - as well, Europe’s debt cannot grow indefinitely. From the 70s, when dollars are no longer tied to gold, they are today only pieces of paper that are printed day and night, and the moment will come when they need to be reduced to a measure that will be fatal for the United States. The American dream will end.
The favorable way for the world is this: all states will cooperate with each other, and not only large countries, but, above all, those where there is a regularly elected government. The economic relationship between them - and this is logical - will temper the desire to wage wars, which are the worst way to resolve conflicts. Each country should be represented by such politicians who love it, who are not paid by any other country, which can make independent decisions. It is impossible to impose a way of life, which we are used to, to other countries, but nobody can force us not to eat pork.
The principle of non-interference in the internal affairs of other states and the consistent defense of one’s own interests should be at the core of the actions of any politician in power. This is an interweaving of the spiritual and material law of a successful life in practice, without which it is impossible to positively develop the world. I think the citizens of the Czech Republic will welcome such politicians, since their future will depend on their choice.
Information