Military Review

Dark future

17
The text below is a logical continuation of the article “World or civil? ”Some of its moments caused questions from readers, so it makes sense to create some expansion of the topic in explaining what, in fact, is the crisis of the American way of development.



Today, American politicians and observers are talking directly about reducing the role of the United States in the world. It would seem - why so? The numerous and high-tech fleet of the United States fully dominates all oceans. The dollar is strong - especially against the background of cataclysms connected with Europe, Japan and China. Major internal unrest has not yet been observed.

But the crisis really is - it is a crisis of management. When representatives of clans of the next Kennedy, Bush or Clinton are sitting in high positions for decades. Such a new nobility, when only the first generation has outstanding achievements, and the descendants at best show only a pale shadow of the past. The collapse of many great countries from the Golden Horde to the Soviet Union began with the degradation of the elite. That is, the economy is still functioning, the army is strong, and the discord is already evident. But the elite, as a rule, does not notice the destructive process. Either notices, but nothing can or does not want to do. Only a truly wise politician can see such a crisis in advance.

The bottom line is that the modern American model of management can demonstrate the highest efficiency only when the whole world is burning with the fire of wars and crises. In conditions of calm and relatively fair competition, it turns out that America is far from being the most attractive country. High taxes, low social guarantees, ethnic crime, and many other points force qualified professionals and investors to increasingly choose the countries of Europe or even Asia, but not the USA. Absurd, if you think about it - to concede to your own satellites, on whose politics and economics you have a decisive influence. However a fact.

Losing in a fair competition (with a tangible advantage), Washington decided to dishonest. And the more acute the domestic political issues are within the United States, the more desperate the White House will behave in the international arena, deciding on the most insane adventures. According to the old American tradition, such provocations usually occur with ships. Cruiser “Maine” (war with Spain), Atlantic liner “Lusitania” (World War I), Pacific Fleet in Hawaii (World War II), Tonkin Incident (invasion of Vietnam) and others. In all these cases, the enemy is either provoked to attack, or some kind of event takes place, in which the other side is accused.

In 2000, a ship was also chosen for the attack. Specifically - the destroyer class "Arly Burke" USS Cole ("Cole"), which was attacked in the port of Aden by two suicide bombers on a motorboat. The explosion killed 17 sailors, and the ship kept afloat - obviously not enough to cause the necessary shock in American society. Something more ambitious was required. Or the sinking of a whole aircraft carrier or the explosion of a whole skyscraper. The number of casualties in both cases would be the same - several thousand - but the aircraft carrier is too expensive, complicated, and there are already too many skyscrapers.

Actually, it’s not even a non-original method of provocation, but how it was used. As in the case of Vietnam, a model for creating an excuse was chosen, followed by a military invasion ... But the next military campaign no longer expanded the spheres of influence. Neither in Vietnam, nor in Iraq with Afghanistan. Rather the opposite. Also, the war no longer brought streams of wealth - only endless losses and expenses. It was here that the American strategists should have realized that the old patterns of behavior no longer work, but they continue to be used with a stubbornness worthy of a better use.

There is also a psychological point that the American elite and its highly paid analysts did not calculate. In a world where the Internet brings new sensations every day, it is no longer enough to surprise anyone with yet another banal act of terrorism or shelling, let alone raise a nation to fight the enemy. If a hundred and twenty years ago, in order to create a wave of indignation in American society, one cruiser was sinking, today for a similar effect, you need to destroy about fifty such ships at a time. So here's your dead end.

The arrival of President Obama’s White House was an attempt to dilute the kaleidoscope of the same persons and names. And at the same time announce the final victory over racial prejudice. But in the end, with black Obama, the result was worse than with the white bush. We will not dwell on what specifically the first African-American president did wrong in domestic politics, but both black and white citizens were dissatisfied with them as a result: all, naturally, for various reasons. Obama's recent curtsy to the LGBT community seems almost the last chance to improve the rating.

Obama and his team today are reminiscent of Alexander II, who wanted to carry out reforms that would satisfy all sectors of society, but in the end everyone just pissed off and turned against himself. Obama offered nothing revolutionary, and his successor is unlikely to offer it. As none of them can answer simple questions. For example, to the following: why did the powerful army, which at one time occupied both Western Europe and part of Asia, now not be able to cope with Iraq and Afghanistan?

With such initial data, it is a bit scary to imagine who the next president of the United States might be and what recklessness he will agree to go to correct the situation. After all, both Bush and Obama, by their frankly inadequate actions, have already shaken the trust in the federal government. Everyone loves the winners, but so far no victories on the external front are visible, and on the internal, the States are increasingly drifting towards the dictatorship. So there is a crisis. He has not yet taken the explicit forms, but there has been very clearly.

The next US president will have to go out of their way to prove that he is better than his predecessors. That is, to present the public with either stable economic growth or loud foreign policy victories. Obama at one time put the public head of bin Laden. The current candidates explicitly state that they are ready to show voters at least Bashar al-Assad’s head, at most Vladimir Putin. What can the whole world lead to such statements, no need to explain. Especially if the actors expressing them and the truth believe that they are capable of it. Elections are scheduled for November 8 2016.

Total. At some stage, any system ceases to respond to the challenges of time, and then falls into complete madness, destroying everything around them. This is true for Russia, as well as for Japan, Germany, China and anyone. This postulate is also fully valid for the United States, although the American ideologists themselves reject it in every way, claiming that their union has reached the highest form of government. However, the rush preparation of a network of concentration camps across the country directly indicates that at least part of the elite is well aware not only of the fact that any holiday ends sometime, but also of the specific dates for its completion.
Author:
17 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Penetrator
    Penetrator 22 July 2015 06: 00
    +9
    I rarely agree with Igor Kabardin, but now I fully share his opinion. The United States, in its current state, is like a riotous man of enormous complexion and with a dangerous razor in his hand. And it’s scary to try to stop such a citizen, and you cannot leave him in such a state - it can do a lot of trouble. One hope is that in his mental breakdown, he will slam his throat with the same razor.
  2. kimyth1
    kimyth1 22 July 2015 06: 05
    +5
    A hole to them from a donut and not V. Putin !!! The fight is serious !!! But V.V.P. wrestler both in sport and in life !!! hi
  3. candy wrapper13
    candy wrapper13 22 July 2015 06: 30
    +3
    *Today, American politicians and observers directly talk about the declining role of the United States in the world. It would seem - why so? The large and high-tech fleet of the United States fully dominates all oceans. The dollar is strong - especially against the backdrop of cataclysms, related to Europe, Japan and China. Major internal unrest has not yet been observed.*- request ?-U.S.: Pacific Northwest will be destroyedand tens of thousands will die warns the Federal Emergency Management Agency[i] -In preparation for such a disaster, Oregon’s Emergencies Ministry called on everyone to participate in Oregon’s largest earthquake exercises on October 15, 2015. The event is part of the largest federal exercises. In Oregon last year, more than 390000 people". [/ I] A colossal earthquake and tsunami will destroy the region, explains Fox News Channel.
    [i] "The disaster is approaching. There is full confidence in this [...] more than ten thousand will die," [/ i], - said the news anchor Fox News.
    [i] "Our operational assumption is that everything that is located to the west of highway No. 5 will be" fried ", [/ i] - said Ministry of Emergency Situations spokeswoman Katherine Schulz from New York.
    "When the next rupture of the Earth's plate occurs, we are seeing the worst natural disaster in North American history," Schultz wrote of the projected future mega-earthquake.
    [I]"The worst natural disaster in American history is approaching [...] if I were living in the Pacific Northwest now, I would rather leave this area - seriously ", [/ i] - warned his audience Shepard Smith, Fox News presenter, before explaining that [i] "colossal earthquake"and [...] tsunamis "are likely to strike the Pacific Northwest in too distant future. "[/ I]
    1. Belousov
      Belousov 22 July 2015 08: 13
      +1
      Rather, but it's hard to believe in all these "predictors".
    2. The comment was deleted.
  4. blizart
    blizart 22 July 2015 06: 48
    +2
    At the end of 80 in the newspaper "Top Secret" I read an essay by the famous writer (in my opinion Yu. Semenov) in which he presented a fantastic situation at that time; The USSR completely disappears physically, where there was its territory a white salt-like surface extends. Then there was a description of the consequences that were then perceived as a revelation, but much later was confirmed in an even more terrible form. It would be interesting to see in literary form the same forecast of the disappearance of America.
  5. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 22 July 2015 06: 56
    +6
    States drift more towards dictatorship

    Judging by the domestic policy of the United States, they are not just drifting toward the dictatorship, but are already running in a jump. This is the total surveillance and prosecution of dissenters (dissidents, of which there are only a few) and the revival of racial discrimination. But what is the result and when the states are waiting is difficult to predict.
  6. Sergey Sitnikov
    Sergey Sitnikov 22 July 2015 07: 37
    +6
    I don’t know some complacency, or false merit, or the gloating of an inexperienced observer ... We are glad that the neighbor bears the symptoms of leukemia or astrocetoma, or something else, they say, he already CARES further than he sees and is sick of him all the time, I'm afraid that Mr. .. we’ll not be exhausted, or he will think up suicide for himself NUCLEAR
    1. washi
      washi 22 July 2015 11: 57
      +2
      Quote: Sergey Sitnikov
      I don’t know some complacency, or false merit, or the gloating of an inexperienced observer ... We are glad that the neighbor bears the symptoms of leukemia or astrocetoma, or something else, they say, he already CARES further than he sees and is sick of him all the time, I'm afraid that Mr. .. we’ll not be exhausted, or he will think up suicide for himself NUCLEAR

      Not any complacency. Just calculation, patience and maximum readiness for any development of events. It’s like in a joke: slowly, slowly, let's go and the whole herd. In Ukraine, this is already working.
      The article forgot to mention slavery legalized in the USA, in the form of private prisons.
  7. zoknyay82
    zoknyay82 22 July 2015 09: 24
    +3
    "... The current candidates directly declare that they are ready to present to the voters the head of at least Bashar al-Assad, at most - Vladimir Putin ..."
    "Do not brag about the army walking ..."
  8. verb
    verb 22 July 2015 09: 52
    +1
    It is time for Yellowstone to show his burrows. Let them think about their problems in AI, it’s enough for them to teach the whole world.
  9. Bayonet
    Bayonet 22 July 2015 12: 16
    -1
    Much has already been written and is being written about the collapse of the United States. There is no desire to argue and engage in verbiage, I just want to know the numbers - how many people leave for permanent residence in other countries from Russia and the USA? Why do our powerful and wealthy receive treatment, buy real estate and educate their children abroad? Only bare numbers, without "traitors", "renegades" and other crap - that's another topic. I think this will be an objective indicator of where to live better.
  10. Archikah
    Archikah 22 July 2015 13: 04
    +3
    Where to live better - everyone chooses for himself. If the pig is better in the mud, then who will blame her for it. Our country is multinational and having stolen a chosen nation in a hurry to get out of the line of possible fire. Well, what is happening in the country is also not a reason for pride. However, this is the Homeland of us living here, and those who leave for whom there is not and cannot be, neither the Homeland, nor holy concepts are leaving. Only comfort and money. God help them.
    The author writes politically correct about African Americans. And the people of Africa - who are they? Let's call a spade a spade - blacks. President of America Obama is an ordinary Negro. There is nothing offensive about this. If a dog is called a dog, this is not an insult to this noble animal.
    I would also like to say that the article is not bad - but there is nothing new in it. All this has already been said and in general gives only an emotional background and nothing more. drinks
    1. Bayonet
      Bayonet 22 July 2015 13: 27
      -1
      Quote: Archikah
      If the pig is better in the mud, then who will blame her for it?

      That's right, we have enough dirt. You tell me the numbers, do not fight in a patriotic hysteria. The question was simple and specific.
      1. tantalum
        tantalum 24 July 2015 17: 28
        -1
        Quote: Bayonet
        If the pig is better in the mud, then who will blame her for it?

        That's right, we have enough dirt.

        And here it’s kind of clean. And where do you actually grunt from?
        1. Bayonet
          Bayonet 24 July 2015 20: 31
          0
          Quote: Tantal
          And where do you actually grunt from?

          Actually, I'm talking! Do you like to grunt? Well grunt on health - a goose a pig is not a friend! From where - it is written together.
          1. tantalum
            tantalum 26 July 2015 17: 51
            0
            Quote: Bayonet
            If the pig is better in the mud, then who will blame her for it?

            That's right, we have enough dirt.

            Actually, these are your words, therefore the conclusion suggests itself that you better dig in the mud and grunt accordingly :)
            Quote: Bayonet
            goose pig is not a friend!

            And here you are right so I flew :)
    2. Bayonet
      Bayonet 22 July 2015 13: 47
      0
      Quote: Archikah
      And the people of Africa - who are they? Let's call a spade a spade - blacks. President of America Obama is an ordinary Negro. There is nothing offensive about this.
      .
      Explanatory dictionary of Ozhegov.
      Negro - a person who works hard and powerlessly for others, of another.
      Efremova T.F. Explanatory Dictionary of the Russian Language. Negro - Disenfranchised person performing hard work. S.I.Ozhegov, N.Yu. Shvedova. Explanatory dictionary of the Russian language.
      Negro -
      1. see blacks.
      2. trans. Man, hard and powerless
      working for another, others.

      This is how the word NEGR is interpreted in famous Russian dictionaries.
  11. Barrcode
    Barrcode 22 July 2015 22: 02
    -1
    After the Japanese Empire attacked the United States (Pearl Harbor, after numerous provocations), all US citizens who were (ethnically) Japanese were driven into pre-prepared camps. Most of them died - they were tortured by hunger, thirst and complete unsanitary conditions. Rarely anyone recalls this, but the fact remains. As for the camps built, there is only one question - for citizens belonging to which ethnic group and nation?
  12. jamalena
    jamalena 22 July 2015 22: 26
    +1
    - not a black man, but a nigga or a black-backed monkey.