Military Review

Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine will consider a bill on the denunciation of the agreement with the Russian Federation on the Sea of ​​Azov

67
Deputies of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine will consider a bill that provides for the denunciation of the Russian-Ukrainian agreement of 2003 on the use of the Kerch Strait and the Sea of ​​Azov, reports "RosBusinessConsulting". Among the authors of the initiative are the First Vice-Speaker of the Ukrainian Parliament, Andrei Paruby, who represents the party "The Popular Front".

Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine will consider a bill on the denunciation of the agreement with the Russian Federation on the Sea of ​​Azov


The contract between Moscow and Kiev provides that merchant ships and warships of both states can move freely in the Kerch Strait and the Sea of ​​Azov. One of his articles notes that all disputes that arise should be resolved “through consultation and negotiation, as well as through other peaceful means.

It is worth noting that in early July of this year, Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko signed five bills on the denunciation of agreements between the Russian Federation and Ukraine: an agreement on cooperation in the military field, an agreement on the transit of Ukrainian troops temporarily on the territory of Moldova, an agreement on mutual protection of secret data, agreements on military interstate transportation and agreement on cooperation in the field of military intelligence.

At the end of May, Prime Minister of Ukraine Arseniy Yatsenyuk announced that Kiev had decided to stop military-technical cooperation with Moscow because of its actions in the Crimea and the Donbas.

“It illegally annexed Crimea, carried out military intervention on the territory of Donetsk and Lugansk regions and represents a danger to Ukraine and its territorial integrity,” he stressed.

The words of the Ukrainian politician were commented by a member of the public council at the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation Igor Korotchenko, noting that they sound rather strange against the background of the statement of Moscow about the termination of cooperation with the Ukrainian defense enterprises, made several months before.
Photos used:
http://top.rbc.ru/
67 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Lord of the Sith
    Lord of the Sith 17 July 2015 08: 27
    +20
    Today, the fighting began as usual in the evening, when the OSCE went to hotels to dine.

    The evening, in principle, was practically no different, from the other hundreds of evenings in shelling, with the exception of persistence of fighting.

    APU at 19:00 began as a standard with mortar attacks. Mines of 120 mmm flew through the Kiev region, p. Oktyabrsky and the Airport. Apparently they realized their mistake that you can’t leave your parts without art support. Although, again, mines flew over the heads of the militia and lay in the rear among peaceful neighborhoods.
    VSN artillery with a force of up to six carnations of the Carnation from 19:30 to 19:40 fired 18 shots at three mortar batteries ukrov. So to speak, they demobilized them. As a result, the upcoming punishers were left without artillery support. After that, numerous attacks began, which I don’t remember since the capture of the airport in late January and the attempts of the Ukrainian Armed Forces to return it.
    19:32 APU attack with forces before platoon from p. Sands of the position of the DNI guard at the traffic police post
    19:37 attack from the Opytnoye settlement at the position of the Somalia brigade at the Airport
    19:37 the attack also began on the position of the "Vostok" battalion in Spartak
    19:49 mortar shelling of the Kiev region (Tochmash)
    20:20 Donetsk. Fighting with mortars in the area of ​​Staromikhailovka.
    20:30 Donetsk. Spartak, Putilovka, Yasinovatsky checkpoint under artillery fire from the positions of the Ukronazists from the direction of Tonenky, Avdeevka.
    20:34 mortar shelling of militia positions on the defense line between Krasnogorovka and Staromikhailovka began.
    At 20:36 attacks at the same time began from the village of Pesky to the traffic police post, from the village of Experimental attack on the Airport and one more on the village of Spartak.
    20:49 the long-suffering Kiev district (Partizansky Avenue) underwent mortar shelling
    20:50 was also subjected to mortar shelling. Spartak village was subjected. The objectives of these attacks are not clear.

    At 21:26 p.m. the BCH artillery launched an artillery raid on the positions of ukrov who had been prepared for the attack on the southeastern outskirts of Peski. Two self-propelled guns Carnation 122-mm fired on the punitive 12 shells. Despite the losses suffered during the shelling, the Ukrainians did not give up their intention to attack and at 22:01 started the third battle from the side of Peski towards the traffic police post.

    Artduels have been going on for two hours. Although what kind of artduels are they, when the punishers shoot at peaceful neighborhoods, and the militia batteries at the APU batteries.

    23:07 Ukrainians launched a fourth attack from the village of Sands at the militia position defending themselves near the traffic police post
    23:27 mortar shelling of the Kiev region again
    23:41 Kiev region under fire, but another quarter fell under fire
    23:40 attack of the punitive from the side of p. Sands choked
    The last half hour from ukrov distinctly working two 120-mm mortars
    23:50 fighting and shelling ceased
    00:00 mortar shelling resumed, arrivals every 4 seconds.
    00:02 Ukrainians again resumed attacks on Spartak, the battle for this village has been erupting for the third time this evening
    00:30 Ukrainians launched a drone, the militia is trying to bring him down from the memory
    There have been no such stubborn people for a long time, as they say "on the eve of events."
    1. Lord of the Sith
      Lord of the Sith 17 July 2015 08: 34
      +8
      Gorlovka ... waiting for the arthur ...
      1. saturn.mmm
        saturn.mmm 17 July 2015 08: 51
        0
        Quote: Sith Lord
        Gorlovka ... waiting for the arthur ...

    2. Trailer
      Trailer 17 July 2015 08: 50
      +3
      What a saturated Minsk-2 however.
      1. Trailer
        Trailer 17 July 2015 08: 51
        +11
        And under the agreement - let it be canceled. And do not miss them in Azov ... and a mustache.
        1. aleks_29296
          aleks_29296 17 July 2015 09: 08
          +9
          With the return of Crimea to the Russian Federation, this agreement, in principle, is outdated, because The Kerch Strait completely came under Russian control.
        2. Rostovchanin
          Rostovchanin 17 July 2015 09: 38
          -7
          I wouldn’t be so happy ... what then would it hinder them from loading the barge in Mariupol full of TNT and blowing up the bridge already built, after 2018?
          1. brelok
            brelok 17 July 2015 09: 55
            +2
            Quote: Rostovchanin
            I wouldn’t be so happy ... what then would it hinder them from loading the barge in Mariupol full of TNT and blowing up the bridge already built, after 2018?

            And who will let them go?
            1. Rostovchanin
              Rostovchanin 17 July 2015 10: 05
              +1
              [quote] And who will let them go? [/ quote
              want to say that now barges do not go across the strait towards the cargo port of Mariupol? in the same way they will be walking in three years, but already under the bridge ... remember the battleship Novorossiysk, I think the ambition of the Ukrainians is no less than that of the Italians.
              1. Karayakupovo
                Karayakupovo 17 July 2015 10: 37
                +2
                Do you know the pass system through the Kerch Strait? I think no. Application for passage, payment, if there is no SOL, then an application for a pilot through an agent. There are many nuances, + AIS control, etc.
                1. Rostovchanin
                  Rostovchanin 17 July 2015 11: 34
                  0
                  Do you know the pass system through the Kerch Strait? I think no. Application for passage, payment, if there is no SOL, then an application for a pilot through an agent. There are many nuances, + AIS control, etc.

                  If you set a goal to arrange a terrorist attack and the money will be found to pay for the passage of the ship, and the pilot will be substituted at the request of the State Department to discredit Russia, I could arrange everything ... desire on September 11, trained planes also directed at the shopping center in New York .... do not be naive . To concoct such a terrorist attack for the CIA - just spit ... So you need to be prepared for everything ...
                  1. Karayakupovo
                    Karayakupovo 17 July 2015 12: 07
                    0
                    You forgot the most important thing to mention - the captain and crew. This is the hardest problem. You will not recognize everyone. Secondly, it will be necessary to blow up at the abutment of the bridge, and the abutments will probably not be near the fairway of the Yenikali Canal.
                    1. Rostovchanin
                      Rostovchanin 17 July 2015 12: 18
                      0
                      You forgot the most important thing to mention - the captain and crew. This is the hardest problem. You will not recognize everyone. Secondly, it will be necessary to blow up at the abutment of the bridge, and the abutments will probably not be near the fairway of the Yenikali Canal.

                      Judging by the events of the last year, it’s possible to find those who are stubborn for this, all the more the bulk carrier is not so big ... God forbid, of course, that this is my sick imagination, but I think it’s technically possible ... again a directed explosion into the ceiling. .. I think over the channel it will be the weakest point, in terms of material stress. I want to note ... this is the version.
                      1. Karayakupovo
                        Karayakupovo 17 July 2015 14: 16
                        +1
                        In Russia, in order to be assigned to a ship, it is necessary: ​​1. A certificate is issued to the captain of the OK Ministry of the Interior and the FSB. 2. The crew needs a sea of ​​documents and some of them are also through the Ministry of Internal Affairs and the FSB. I think in other countries as well. Before approaching from the south to Cape Takil, border guards ask for a vessel, well, from the north to area 455, too. Technically not feasible. I’m talking like the captain of a ship.
                      2. veksha50
                        veksha50 17 July 2015 19: 39
                        +1
                        Quote: Rostovchanin
                        I want to note ... this is the version.


                        I read your comments ... In vain you are minus - the version has the right to exist ...

                        However, YOU will ask the question: why blow up the Kerch bridge ??? What political or economic dividends will this act bring to Ukraine ??? Or to the same CIA, as you say (that they can be done from THEM) ...

                        It seems to me that this act will be sewn with white thread specifically against Ukraine, and much worse than the thread that sewed the charges against the militia and Russia for the downed Boeing ...
              2. tolyasik0577
                tolyasik0577 17 July 2015 10: 39
                +4
                I think that by 2018 Russian or Novorossky barges will go under the Kerch bridge
          2. Lelek
            Lelek 17 July 2015 10: 58
            0
            Quote: Rostovchanin
            what then will it hinder them from loading a barge in Mariupol full of TNT and blowing up the bridge that has already been built, after 2018?


            And will there be at least one Layba from Mariupol? negative
          3. Homo
            Homo 17 July 2015 11: 00
            0
            Quote: Rostovchanin
            I wouldn’t be so happy ... what then would it hinder them from loading the barge in Mariupol full of TNT and blowing up the bridge already built, after 2018?

            Are you sure that in 2018 Mariupol will be Ukrainian?
            1. Rostovchanin
              Rostovchanin 17 July 2015 11: 38
              0
              Are you sure that in 2018 Mariupol will be Ukrainian?

              There is also Berdyansk with a port, if that.
              1. Karayakupovo
                Karayakupovo 17 July 2015 12: 22
                0
                I was in Mariupol and in Berdyansk. In Berdyansk in November 2007, they stood for 28 days due to flooding of the port after the storm on November 4. You cannot hide the loading of such a volume and cargo either from the crew, or from the port. Then you indicate in the declarations. In the AIS (Automatic Ship Identifier) ​​you score the departure and destination ports, the flag of the ship, the surname of the captain, number of crew, date, etc.
              2. Homo
                Homo 17 July 2015 19: 10
                +1
                Quote: Rostovchanin
                There is also Berdyansk with a port, if that.

                See my comment above, just replace Mariupol - Berdyansk.
          4. BAIKAL03
            BAIKAL03 17 July 2015 12: 09
            0
            Rostovites you are probably a fan of Harry Potter, you are funny laughing
          5. sap
            sap 17 July 2015 21: 31
            0
            The border guard at the port exit, or do you think they will snoop around our inland waters without inspection?
      2. Tanais
        Tanais 17 July 2015 08: 53
        -1
        Quote: Karavan
        What a saturated Minsk-2 however.

        Signatory States, satisfied yes There are no alternatives, they say what ...
    3. 78bor1973
      78bor1973 17 July 2015 09: 20
      +2
      In the course of the ukrov there was a "tactical dullness", some forces force them to go into senseless attacks, but there are no intelligent commanders on the ground along the way!
      1. Serg 122
        Serg 122 17 July 2015 10: 16
        +1
        Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine will consider a bill on the denunciation of the agreement with the Russian Federation on the Sea of ​​Azov

        So what's next? Are they preparing another "boiler" for themselves? fool feel recourse
  2. ALEA IACTA EST
    ALEA IACTA EST 17 July 2015 08: 29
    +7
    In their place, I would not bark at a country capable of abolishing Ukraine ... fool
    1. Rostislav
      Rostislav 17 July 2015 10: 34
      +1
      So it’s not they who decide whether to bark or not. The owner poked with a stick - they started yapping.
  3. Putinets
    Putinets 17 July 2015 08: 31
    +6
    Terrible. Right now they will distribute slingshots and how they will start to shoot pebbles at the ships of "quilted jackets" ... It's scary.
    1. Tanais
      Tanais 17 July 2015 08: 55
      0
      Quote: Putin
      Terrible. Right now they will distribute slingshots and how they will start to shoot pebbles at the ships of "quilted jackets" ... It's scary.


      Ukro-kriegsmarine, will receive a historical order: "Drown them all!" ...
      1. Gani
        Gani 17 July 2015 11: 16
        0
        Ukro-kriegsmarine, will receive a historical order: "Drown them all!" - open kingstones! on all the remaining ships of the Navy and to cut the rubber melt composition!
  4. kimyth1
    kimyth1 17 July 2015 08: 32
    +7
    The Kerch Strait is ours !!! let them denounce even Ukraine itself !!!
    1. xxxMYSTICxxx
      xxxMYSTICxxx 17 July 2015 08: 44
      +8
      The same thought occurred to me. If the strait is ours, and the current agreement provides for the free movement of ships along it, then with a unilateral break, respectively, they will not have access to the Sea of ​​Azov and back. This is either insanity or an anticipation of an imminent defeat on the Azov coast ...
    2. 78bor1973
      78bor1973 17 July 2015 09: 23
      +1
      The fact of the matter is that in the absence of Crimea, this treaty was vitally important to us, now it is Ukraine that needs this treaty, and we are "on the side"!
    3. udincev
      udincev 17 July 2015 09: 29
      +3
      Quote: kimyth1
      The Kerch Strait is ours !!! let them denounce even Ukraine itself !!!

      But the answer is needed: to denounce the agreement on the transit of Russian gas through Ukraine. And the west urgently by the winter of 2015-16. will build both North-3 and Turkish-2 ...
      1. pv1005
        pv1005 17 July 2015 12: 02
        0
        But the answer is needed: to denounce the agreement on the transit of Russian gas through Ukraine.

        You can even cooler. Denounce the transit of Ukrainian gas (as they believe, such as bought, then ours) through the territory of Russia. laughing And let them pump the EU gas bought by the EU in Russia. fellow
  5. Bakht
    Bakht 17 July 2015 08: 34
    +26
    Unilateral denunciation of contracts is a very interesting and pleasant thing. I want to do what I want. It is high time to denounce ALL treaties with Ukraine. And about the borders too.

    And the Sea of ​​Azov is generally interesting. If there is no agreement, then the Ukrainian courts in the Sea of ​​Azov have nothing to do. They no longer have the right to go through the Kerch Strait. The port of Mariupol is losing its significance. Or gaining, but already as Russian. Closing the Kerch Strait for Ukrainian vessels and any vessels operating in Ukraine automatically turns the Sea of ​​Azov into inland sea of ​​the Russian Federation.
    1. Penetrator
      Penetrator 17 July 2015 08: 41
      0
      automatically turns the Sea of ​​Azov into the inland sea of ​​the Russian Federation.

      But in reality, the Azov Sea will turn into the inland sea of ​​the Russian Federation, by building not the Kerch bridge, but the Kerch dam. Reformatting the map, so to speak smile
      1. veksha50
        veksha50 17 July 2015 09: 20
        +1
        Quote: Penetrator
        will turn into the inland sea of ​​the Russian Federation, through the construction of not a Kerch bridge, but a Kerch dam.



        And who needs it ??? In spite ukram frostbitten ears ???

        PS You just need to physically (by the coast guard) stop any ukrov movement on the water ...
    2. udincev
      udincev 17 July 2015 09: 23
      0
      Quote: Bakht
      They no longer have the right to go through the Kerch Strait. The port of Mariupol is losing its significance. Or gaining, but already as Russian.

      It is only necessary to introduce strictness similar to Turkish ones in the passage of straits. Then who does not recognize Crimea as Russian forgets the Kerch Strait.
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. Geosun
      Geosun 17 July 2015 09: 45
      0
      The meaning of the agreement is that the Sea of ​​Azov is recognized as the inland sea of ​​Russia and Ukraine and no one can swim there without the permission of our two countries. When the agreement is broken, the sea passes under international jurisdiction. That is, the NATO fleet can theoretically be legally located in the Sea of ​​Azov. That’s how they are going to spoil us.
      1. srha
        srha 17 July 2015 10: 20
        +3
        But what about territorial waters? Will they really violate the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea and a military breakthrough in the Kerch Strait?
    5. sap
      sap 17 July 2015 21: 42
      0
      Quote: Bakht
      It is high time to denounce ALL treaties with Ukraine. And about the borders too.

      You still wake up laughing with a mine, but the UN has not registered an agreement on the establishment of borders between Ukraine and the Russian Federation and there are no demarcation cards! This has already been discussed about 18 months ago on some kind of resource.

      Ban Ki-moon made an interesting statement at the UN, and for some reason the Ukrainian media stubbornly keep silent about him! ..
      The fact is that the UN Security Council once again considered the issue of Ukraine, and experts made the following conclusion in the framework of international law: it turns out that since the collapse of the USSR, Ukraine has not carried out and did not properly register with the UN the demarcation of its borders as a state .. They remain along the borders of the administrative district of the USSR, according to the usual treaty within the CIS, which the UN does not have legal force.
      Since the country does not have its official border within the framework of international law, there is no reason to talk about its violation by anyone.
      There is also no reason to talk about separatism, i.e. forcibly changing the configuration of the border.
      You cannot change that which does not exist!
      The demarcation of the borders of Ukraine - only in the project by agreement with the EU!
  6. Decathlon
    Decathlon 17 July 2015 08: 34
    +1
    "... and warships of both states can move freely in the Kerch Strait and the Sea of ​​Azov ..."
    Well, everything is clear with our ships! And, the heavy metal-carrying cruiser "Sagaidachny" how ?! He himself + two tugs on the sides ?! fool
  7. Reserve buildbat
    Reserve buildbat 17 July 2015 08: 35
    +11
    Get in trouble ... They are denouncing the agreement, so not a single crest of a glimpse near the Kerch Strait and in the Sea of ​​Azov. laughing The strait is already controlled by Russia. So denunciation is completely pointless, although it looks like a serious step. Window dressing for owners.
    hi
  8. solovey
    solovey 17 July 2015 08: 37
    +6
    Yes, they no longer have the Sea of ​​Azov (only 12 miles of coastline further neutral waters) and the Kerch Strait is finally ours !!!!! One word .
  9. AlNikolaich
    AlNikolaich 17 July 2015 08: 44
    +3
    In the course of this bill, the Verkhovna Rada implies a complete abandonment of the ruins of the Sea of ​​Azov! With corresponding output
    Azov from her jurisdiction!
    That's all!
  10. rf xnumx
    rf xnumx 17 July 2015 08: 45
    +18
    Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine will consider a bill on the denunciation of the agreement with the Russian Federation on the Sea of ​​Azov
  11. aszzz888
    aszzz888 17 July 2015 08: 46
    +1
    They, great crocuses know at least what to do ???? By the way, we breathe one air.
    Disorder, it is necessary to separate it from us.
    Here pri.urki sick on the head !!!!!!
  12. AID.S
    AID.S 17 July 2015 08: 46
    0
    Received. Agreement on the delimitation of powers. I hope ...
  13. olimpiada15
    olimpiada15 17 July 2015 08: 48
    +1
    And it’s time to denounce the agreement, because, in the actual situation, the ruin has nothing to do with it, the Sea of ​​Azov is the inland Russian sea, and they have nothing to do there.
  14. 31rus
    31rus 17 July 2015 08: 48
    0
    Everything is right, there is no Ukraine state, what will be and how much is not clear, so the contracts need to either be reviewed (you need to have a head here) or canceled, that’s such a sense
  15. GUKTU
    GUKTU 17 July 2015 08: 50
    0
    Again blurted out without thinking laughing
  16. Alcoholic
    Alcoholic 17 July 2015 08: 59
    +1
    )))))) Clowns.
    Act that drawbar.
    And in the hands of maydanut just toilet paper.
  17. Tatarus
    Tatarus 17 July 2015 09: 01
    0
    Some kind of direct Chronicles of DurDom. Each of their decree and law the farther the funnier. And the farther the life, the worse.
  18. udincev
    udincev 17 July 2015 09: 04
    0
    One of his articles notes that all disputes arising should be resolved “through consultations and negotiations, as well as other peaceful means.

    Now how to resolve contentious issues?
    By sending the dispute of the enemy’s disputed objects (this is already taking into account all the denunciations) to the Supreme Court of Neptune? ..
  19. veksha50
    veksha50 17 July 2015 09: 06
    0
    "The agreement between Moscow and Kiev provides that merchant ships and warships of both states can freely move in the Kerch Strait and the Sea of ​​Azov" ...

    So what do they want to stop ???

    For that matter, Russia has the strength to stop ALL Ukrainian vessels from moving in this area without any contracts ... Even rubber boats have no place for them ...
  20. EvgNik
    EvgNik 17 July 2015 09: 06
    0
    Let me remind you again of Cowen's axiom: The amount of reason on Earth is a constant value.
    That is, no matter how the number of people on the globe increases - there is always one rational amount. On the example of Ukraine, this is very noticeable.
  21. atamankko
    atamankko 17 July 2015 09: 09
    0
    Simulation of the seething activity of the junta and the Verkhovna Rada.
  22. sl22277
    sl22277 17 July 2015 09: 21
    0
    After that the contract is "lost". What will be the situation with the Kerch Strait? Or will Ukrainians only fish in Azov ?!
  23. angurow
    angurow 17 July 2015 09: 24
    0
    Make the Sea of ​​Azov the inland sea of ​​Russia.
  24. VSZMK
    VSZMK 17 July 2015 09: 25
    0
    Quote: veksha50
    "The agreement between Moscow and Kiev provides that merchant ships and warships of both states can freely move in the Kerch Strait and the Sea of ​​Azov" ...

    And if there are no warships, you can denounce the agreement.
  25. sgr291158
    sgr291158 17 July 2015 09: 29
    0
    I'm not happy, but some kind of house hee hee. They all have to tour the world and make people laugh.
  26. A.Anatol
    A.Anatol 17 July 2015 09: 32
    +1
    And in my opinion everything is right, because now Crimea Russia and the borders need to be reviewed in this light!
    One BUT! so as not to twitch in vain worth the wait!
    so that the head AT ALL does not hurt about someone else's The Sea of ​​Azov!
  27. Evgeni
    Evgeni 17 July 2015 09: 35
    0
    And then in the Azov Sagaidachny float, ... and again nobody loves them, only everyone mocks
    1. Sanitary
      Sanitary 17 July 2015 10: 17
      0
      Who will let the "Dachny saiga" into the Azovskoye? There our people rest (Azov, Yeisk, Temryuk). It is not appropriate in Russia to frighten vacationers with the military troughs of a "brotherly state".
  28. anfil
    anfil 17 July 2015 09: 50
    +7
    One of his articles states that all disputes arising should be resolved “through consultation and negotiation, as well as by others peaceful means.


    Well, they don’t want to resolve issues peacefully, at least there’s a count on the head.
  29. denk20
    denk20 17 July 2015 10: 03
    +1
    Those. By denouncing the agreement on the Sea of ​​Azov and the Kerch Strait, Ukraine has completely abandoned claims to the Crimea and the Donbass, and is also preparing the way for the abandonment of Zaporozhye and Kherson. Do it right.
  30. Sanitary
    Sanitary 17 July 2015 10: 07
    0
    Yaytsenyuh, as usual, plays in public. fellow
  31. ASK505
    ASK505 17 July 2015 10: 19
    +1
    Bridge security issues should be thought out to the smallest detail. Under and above and from all sides of the bridge. This is a strategic facility. One can expect anything from this galloping herd. We need to start shaking all the boats right now under the yellow-blue flag of Lower Austria in front of the strait.
  32. Clueless
    Clueless 17 July 2015 12: 51
    0
    Yes, declare the Ukrainians have us chtoli war. Quickly let this puppet government go into the mince and Ukraine will heal normally, and we too
  33. provincial
    provincial 17 July 2015 14: 10
    +1
    http://topwar.ru/uploads/images/2015/291/xfcu515.jpg
  34. tuts
    tuts 17 July 2015 18: 00
    +1
    I correctly understood that the Sea of ​​Azov will be completely closed to Ukrainian courts as a result of the denunciation of the treaty. The Government of Ukraine generally studied geography at least somehow, or they have another 6 US fleet moving to the coast of Belarus
  35. Knight Rider
    Knight Rider 17 July 2015 19: 51
    +1
    Quote: Geosun
    NATO's fleet could theoretically be legally located in the Sea of ​​Azov. That’s how they are going to spoil us.

    So I imagine the Amer destroyer in the Sea of ​​Azov what Well he immediately stranded, pull it out later
  36. pvv113
    pvv113 17 July 2015 21: 57
    0
    Among the sponsors of the initiative is the First Vice-Speaker of the Ukrainian Parliament Andriy Parubiy

    The adequacy of the vice speaker has long been suspicious
  37. Thompson
    Thompson 17 July 2015 23: 22
    0
    Quote: Rostovchanin
    I wouldn’t be so happy ... what then would it hinder them from loading the barge in Mariupol full of TNT and blowing up the bridge already built, after 2018?

    This will be their last explosion in the basics. After that, there will be no Ukrainian fleet