Solid foam against fire

30
Solid foam against fire


How Russian chemists became revolutionaries in fire fighting

Fire fighting is a complex and responsible area, and it seems even more surprising to see how slowly technologies are developing in this area. The extinguishing foams, the use of which began more than a century ago, have changed little over the past time - but, perhaps, a real revolution will soon begin in this area. In any case, the new development of the Petersburg chemists of the ITMO University and the NGO “SOPOT” looks revolutionary from all sides, from the idea to the environmental safety. Alexander Vinogradov, Deputy Head of the Laboratory “Solution Chemistry of Advanced Materials and Technologies” at ITMO University, answered the questions of the Russian Planet.

- Alexander, where did the idea of ​​creating a new fire extinguishing foam come from? From your chemistry classes, from business order or something else?

- There will need a little insight into the current situation in the market of extinguishing materials. Such materials should always be evaluated on three main parameters: the effectiveness and versatility of extinguishing various materials, including solid and liquid combustible materials; the cost of the foam itself; finally, the environmental safety of the application. And if we analyze all these parameters in the complex, we will see that the market itself is huge, but at the same time it is rather poor in terms of choice. There are not so many truly universal, effective and safe fire-fighting foams in the world.

Russia in this regard is a very interesting market. Our largest consumers, oil and gas giants, use fire extinguishing equipment and technical equipment supplied from the USA and designed to work with mixtures based on fluorine-containing synthetic frothers (AFFF). Indeed, the ability to localize and eliminate the source of ignition AFFF are the most effective among all similar drugs. On the other hand, they have to be purchased in the same America either in finished form or in the form of raw materials. And most importantly, AFFF toxic and extremely negative impact on the environment.

Their half-life in nature is at least 40 years. The products of semi-decomposition fluorosynthetics accumulate in plants and animals, enter the human body. In short, it is not possible to use AFFF-based foams, unless then a whole set of measures is being taken on utilization of residues and restoration of ecosystems.

Therefore, a convention banning the use of fluorosynthetic drugs was adopted a few years ago both in the USA and in Europe. The use of AFFF is virtually stopped everywhere, but is still allowed in Russia. In the rest of the countries, they took the path of banning AFFF, there they use similar drugs - if not so effective, but not so dangerous.

So, when last year we opened our laboratory in ITMO and got acquainted with the company SOPOT, the task arose almost by itself. This company is the largest developer of fire extinguishing agents and a leader in the production of foam generating devices; it is active not only in Russia, but also in some foreign markets, for example, in China and Cuba. They have their own staff who develop and implement new technologies in this area.

However, SOPOT does not develop and produce its own frothers preparations. Therefore, when our team of chemists spoke with colleagues from this company, we immediately noticed that all existing blowing agents — and their production has been going on for more than 100 years — are derivatives of organic substances.


The microstructure of silica foam. Source: Alexander Vinogradov / ITMO University

From the point of view of thermodynamics, carbon – carbon, carbon – hydrogen and other bonds existing in organic compounds are unstable at high temperatures. It is impossible for them to remain intact when heated above 300 ° C, but inorganic substances in this sense give much greater freedom. So the idea to try inorganic foam arose almost immediately.

- And how does this foam look like? What is she like?

“Our material is two-component, consisting of the most common foaming agent, plus a new composition based on silica nanoparticles, which ensures the curing of the foam, translating it into a ceramic phase.

Silica is a common silicon oxide (IV), which is familiar to everyone, for example, in the form of quartz. Its particles can polymerize in a matter of seconds (we can vary this time from 5 to 30 seconds) and force the foam to adhere quite firmly to any burning surface. Experiments have shown that our foam can even be fixed on ordinary polished glass and harden, turning into something like a porous ceramic sponge, which reliably isolates the surface from fire and high temperatures. Nothing of the kind has ever been offered close to it, and no one has done anything of the kind.

The effectiveness of fire extinguishing with such foam is easy to understand. Imagine that your room is on fire, and you pour ordinary wall and ceiling over the foam. Foam quickly flows down, no more than 5% lingers on vertical surfaces, and even if you extinguish these surfaces, they soon risk burning again. Firefighters have to “spill” the building again and again. The hardening effect here can play a key role.

- How does the process of formation of such a solid foam?


- Imagine: we have the first component, which is responsible for the formation of foam, a multitude of air-filled bubbles. The second component is injected into the first one, just before being applied to the burning surface, and makes the foam harden.

So, the foam enters the burning object, the temperature of which repeatedly exceeds its own. As a result, it cools it sharply - to a temperature below the pyrolysis stage - and after a couple of seconds it hardens, preventing the re-ignition from developing. Roughly speaking, we envelop the burning object with a “ceramic coat”. In comparison with the same AFFF, our efficiency is higher by more than 20 times.


On the left, field tests of a new extinguishing foam, on the right, the polymerization of its microstructure. Source: Alexander Vinogradov / ITMO University


Unlike conventional foams, which due to the enormous temperatures evaporate in a matter of seconds, our foamed silica does not collapse. When water evaporates, crystallization of the amorphous silica particles only intensifies, the crystal frame is compacted - and the foam, like a brick in an industrial furnace, becomes only stronger and more reliable protects our object.

- But what will be the result of such a quenching? Not burning, but generally useless lump of solid foam?


“Although we are talking about solidification, polymerized foam is not solid in the household sense of the word. Rather, it resembles a gel, which in principle can be removed from the surface. On the subject she can last a week or two, in fact, until the first rain. Such foam has a powerful ability to adsorb water, therefore, having absorbed it, it softens and is easily subjected to mechanical destruction. As a result, even once in the drain or sewage system, it will not last long and will disintegrate to silica particles with a diameter of 100 – 150 nm.

- And do these particles themselves have no toxic properties?

- Silica - the material is extremely resistant and chemically inert, its safety has been repeatedly proven. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), as well as the European Medicines Agency (EMEA), whose findings are largely guided by our Ministry of Health, prohibits only intravenous and intramuscular use of silica. But orally it is completely safe. You are probably familiar with such a popular drug like Enterosgel? It consists of silica nanoparticles.

We have already managed to get a certificate of compliance with the first class of biodegradability - in general, for the first time in the world for such drugs. Although it is worth noting that such a certificate would more accurately be called a “biocompatibility certificate”: silica particles in nature will not decompose, they are only absorbed and carried by microorganisms without any harm for them, and therefore for the environment.

- It turns out, no restrictions on the use of such a silica foam is not expected?

- Exactly! And this is one of its great merits. Not so long ago, in Surgut, we conducted tests on the use of our preparation for the creation of felting strips. Now for this purpose using phosphate-based products, which are considered quite inexpensive. However, phosphates are water soluble, so they are easily carried away by rain and soil moisture. In addition, phosphates are important fertilizers, in the forest they are quickly recycled plants. Therefore, after such a band has been created, it will not last long.

Our tests showed that the barrier with the use of "hardening foam" lasts much longer, allowing you to localize the fire in the forest and prevent the spread of fire: through such a barrier a few meters wide no fire will "jump". Ideally, firefighters will have up to two weeks in order to arrive at the scene, deliver equipment and organize fire fighting.

- How was your role in creating a fire extinguishing foam distributed? What part of the decisions did you, ITMO chemists, and which part - the developers of the company "Sopot"?

- There was no strict division of labor, although, of course, we were more concerned with solving chemical problems, because this is our profile. They concentrated more on the technological part, which also found a huge number of problems.


Test results: hardened foam reliably protects the object. Source: Alexander Vinogradov / ITMO University

It can be noted that technological adaptation has become a key issue for the possibility of generating hardening foams. That is why NPO SOPOT, being a leader in the field of creating foam generating devices in Russia and possessing a huge baggage of experimental experience, was able to solve all the issues that arose, ensuring the stable operation of devices for generating hardening foams. It would be correct to say that 90% success was in the hands of the company that ordered this research and today is the copyright holder of the technology.

Generally speaking, there were a lot of difficult "trifles", it is even surprising that they were solved so quickly. Only 26 November, 2014, the first discussion of our idea took place - and on March 15 a patent application was sent. In May, the development was demonstrated to the Minister of Emergency Situations Vladimir Puchkov and his colleagues from Belarus and Mongolia at the exhibition "Integrated Safety" in Moscow. And already in June, the forest fences were tested using a specially converted MT-LB (light armored multipurpose transporter. - RP.).

- What is the continuation of this stories?


- The market is gigantic, the potential is mad, I can say for sure. And from the business side, the interest in our development is huge. There are proposals for the use of such a two-component foam for specialized applications, such as fire extinguishing in mines and at oil loading stations.

As far as I know, in the company “Sopot” the prospects of this invention were taken very seriously. A specialized chemical laboratory has already been equipped, a fire test capsule has been created, new developments are underway, and the launch of the production of both components is being prepared. But we have nothing to do with it.

Our task is not commerce. We are doing science, and the main focus of our laboratory is basic research, some of which can be quickly turned into practical, practical solutions. This is exactly what we are doing: two-component hardening foam is not the only one of our practical developments.

In the near future, we are planning to register our own startup InnoColloids, it will be engaged in the release of innovative colloidal substances that will find the widest application - from holography to medicine and solar energy. It is difficult to promise something, but I think it will be just a bomb: I can say that now we can increase the brightness of liquid crystals by 20% without any serious efforts, suggest a new technology for printing nanoconstructions, present unique non-invasive biosensors ... It will be a project completely focused on foreign markets. But this is a topic for another conversation.
30 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. The comment was deleted.
  2. +5
    17 July 2015 14: 13
    And then the motolyga was noted. smile
    1. 0
      17 July 2015 14: 51
      This is MTL-nano, you need to understand! feel Development of scientific research institute BTT named after Chubais, dear, to the impossibility ... belay
      1. For Russia
        +1
        17 July 2015 17: 53
        God grant that technology works.

        And about the high cost, if it reduces the damage from fires and the cost of restoration, it’s good.
        1. +1
          18 July 2015 03: 53
          This is a giant breakthrough, judging by the text, extinguishes anything in 5 seconds and absolutely without harm, very impressive.
  3. +11
    17 July 2015 14: 21
    ... "This will be a project entirely focused on foreign markets."
    Why completely? Will such innovations not be in demand in Russia?
    1. +7
      17 July 2015 14: 27
      Also interesting. As if we do not need anything, although given the strength of neoliberal clans, the choice is clear here, such ideas are usually suppressed in our country, so the manufacturers of "curiosities" have to sell their technology to the West for its development and improvement. And there, according to the classical scheme, they will be rolled over to us in the form of a "miracle-European-technological-thought".
    2. 0
      17 July 2015 15: 14
      Quote: Igor Polovodov
      Why completely? Will such innovations not be in demand in Russia?

      Duc ours will buy for rubles, but give them all the currency and more.
      1. +1
        17 July 2015 17: 48
        It is commendable that the inventors of such products did not change with us. Only the author did not answer one important question: what will happen to the living creature that this foam will harden and accordingly harden? This moment is very important and must also be taken into account.
    3. +1
      17 July 2015 20: 04
      Quote: Igor Polovodov
      ... "This will be a project entirely focused on foreign markets."
      Why completely? Will such innovations not be in demand in Russia?

      There is no doubt how much time has passed, and no one has shown interest in the ASP-500 fire-prevention bomb of the FSUE GNPP Basalt. The Ministry of Emergency Situations, the Ministry of Defense, and who else can buy as not a foreign customer.
    4. 0
      17 July 2015 21: 19
      A crap that many can succumb to, bought with clever words.
      1) AFFF blowing agents are not at all as common as the author interprets.
      2) Silica, about the wonderful properties of which the inventor has been propagating for so long - the essence of ordinary sand (it cannot melt and melt under given conditions - well).
      3) There are no results of either full-scale or model tests, only words about the absolute superiority of the new technology.
      For a charlatan author, allaverds, so to speak, should not, when working on this topic, call firefighters firefighters.
  4. +1
    17 July 2015 14: 23
    urgently to submarine repair plants !!! and surface ships !!! good
    1. +2
      17 July 2015 14: 53
      Quote: kimyth1
      urgently to submarine repair plants !!! and surface ships !!!

      Uh-huh ... and who will then remove this "crystalline foam" from the compartments and interbody space, from cables and pipelines? And if she gets into the mechanisms?

      At one time, it was proposed to lift ships by pumping two components inside, which formed a foamed polyurethane foam when connected. The benefit, it seems, is obvious: there is no need to carefully seal the case as when injecting air - the composition itself will find cracks, squeeze out in them and freeze.
      Then they figured out how much it would cost to remove a solid array of polystyrene foam from a surfaced ship ... and buried this idea.
      1. +1
        17 July 2015 15: 24
        Quote: Alexey RA
        At one time, it was proposed to lift ships by pumping two components inside, which formed a foamed polyurethane foam when connected. The benefit, it seems, is obvious: there is no need to carefully seal the case as when injecting air - the composition itself will find cracks, squeeze out in them and freeze.
        Then they figured out how much it would cost to remove a solid array of polystyrene foam from a surfaced ship ... and buried this idea.

        what and if you stupidly download hundreds or thousands of small balls? When lifting, it seems that the main danger is breaking the ship into parts due to uneven lifting force, the foam can be easily cleaned with gasoline or acetone what
        1. +1
          17 July 2015 15: 40
          Quote: Corsair
          and if you stupidly download hundreds or thousands of small balls?

          But this was just the next proposal - instead of polystyrene. smile
  5. +3
    17 July 2015 14: 26
    "- The market is gigantic, the potential is frantic, I can say that for sure. And from the business side, the interest in our development is simply enormous.

    They must hide behind patents, certificates, etc. from all sides.
    The sharks of developed capitalism will not tolerate such competition, especially the Americans, who find it like a sickle in the balls.
    Interestingly, and ours offered Kiev such when the tank farm was burning there? It would be very good show, product advertising, well, in-kind tests in combat conditions.
  6. 0
    17 July 2015 14: 27
    The good news is, just do not merge the secret of development to the west. Although ... there, too, are not fools and they will pick up the idea.
    And the market is actually really huge.
  7. 0
    17 July 2015 14: 46
    About focusing on foreign markets. There is such a tendency in science. It's like fashion. Large corporations "without looking" buy everything imported. It is easier for them to sell our product by "wrapping" it in an import wrapper. You set up a joint venture "horns and hooves", headquartered in Cyprus, and sell our product to Russian consumers in beautiful foreign packaging.
  8. 0
    17 July 2015 14: 47
    Congratulations - cool development. Maybe now they will put out forest fires faster and will not disappear so much good. It will be economically justified.
  9. +3
    17 July 2015 14: 56
    Interesting news and good. It is only a pity that such mental potential is in little demand in the Russian Federation, judging by the fact that the main developments are aimed at foreign consumers ... Of these moments, our technological lag is unpleasant. But! The road will be overcome by a walker! It would be better to ride ...
  10. 0
    17 July 2015 15: 31
    If we objectively consider what fire is and what processes contribute to this, then a foam can be a very effective method of extinguishing fires, and certainly not water, and indeed not matter. Creating a space with a certain potential magnetic fluxes. It is as a dynamic process, the initial in the organization, which will be the movement of air, but will be used its ionizing ability to create potential for the so-called. the turbine blades and, accordingly, an alternating magnetic field will be created, which in terms of parameters will resist the creation of conditions that interfere with the formation of fire as a plasma between the contours of space with potential. In fact, the principle is the same as in jamming devices in electronic warfare devices
    1. +2
      17 July 2015 16: 00
      EW devices for energy consumption and energy release are comparable to radio sources, and often forced to be much more powerful. What energy must a magnetic field source have to fight a fire of 1000 degrees over an area of ​​1 hectare? I think something comparable ... such a small, portable nuclear power plant?
      1. +1
        17 July 2015 16: 02
        You understood correctly. It is precisely about such possibilities that are spoken of.
        1. +1
          17 July 2015 20: 24
          This is not serious...
          For example, in transport it is much more efficient to inert the atmosphere of fire hazardous systems, or to separate fireproof barriers from living quarters, cheaply and cheerfully. Energy sources of such power simply cannot be established there. And using such systems, as indicated in the article, is much more promising. Not only using as a fire extinguishing agent, but also a preventive measure. From these technologies to the creation of cheap non-combustible protective coatings is one step.

          PS
          It is not yet known how Mother Earth will relate to the magnetic fields of such powers ...
          1. +1
            17 July 2015 23: 12
            Of course not seriously! But sooner or later it is necessary to begin to research and use. Nothing happens right away. But you need to start!
  11. AUL
    +2
    17 July 2015 17: 48
    The article carefully addresses the issue of the cost of this method. This causes some doubts. If the cost is high enough - we don’t have such a tool, we will extinguish it with water, as with Tsar Peter Alekseevich.
  12. +1
    17 July 2015 20: 38
    At one time, in graduate school, he was engaged in studying methods of extracting this very silica from grain production wastes. Now it would probably come in handy. And in those years it was nafig nobody needed. And the pictures from the electron microscope are almost the same, even nostalgia surged. Now the main thing is to be patented and do production. Because if China grabs this, ours will forget about the benefits of this discovery.
  13. 0
    17 July 2015 21: 00
    The thing is worth it. But will she get to ordinary fire departments !?
  14. +2
    17 July 2015 21: 06
    You will not find foaming agents based on fluorosynthetics (type AFFF) in the afternoon with fire. They stand - like heroin, coupled with cocaine. They are necessary only for extinguishing specific liquids that are not particularly common in everyday life and in production. Particularly retarded companies are armed with it, but do not let ... use it, even a liter, in the classroom or exercises.
    All major fire engines in cities and other populated areas are refueled with blowing agents on a completely different basis (even biodegradable, according to manufacturers). Oil and all its products are stewed satisfactorily with their help (if the hands of the combat crew from where it is needed). So - we do not need either what is being offered or what we are going to exchange for.
    Already slowly, in the old way, on horse-keg draft.
    In fact, a lot of different blowing agents (PO), both for general use and highly specialized (for extinguishing alcohols), have been developed and are still successfully used both in the practice of units and in automatic installations. The fluorinated foaming agents indicated in the article show themselves very well in extinguishing LVH and GF, but themselves are expensive to disgrace.
    PS. And in the 40s - 80s there was a foaming agent PO-6K (based on bovine blood). Stewed well, kept sucks.
  15. 0
    18 July 2015 08: 42
    A state prize to give people? Since they are not in business all the more. Minds need to be encouraged!
  16. +2
    18 July 2015 11: 32
    Oh, experts!
    "Foam extinguishes awesome!" - this is a mess for a professional!
    And the water quenches awesomely, and neutral, inert gases. There are only a few maaaaalenky nuances:
    - what class of fire are we extinguishing, in fact,
    - what should be the intensity of the supply of extinguishing agent,
    - what is the range of the compact part of the jet of this OTV,
    - what is the extinction area by one generator of this OTV,
    - What should be the performance of this generator?
    It would be interesting to hear the opinion of Professor Abduragimov on this topic or Saushev, and indeed fire specialists. Abduragimov, by the way, was very successful in extinguishing Kuwaiti wells after the war with Iraq, much more successfully than the "partners", mainly using powder extinguishing vehicles. A powerful thing - he personally took part in extinguishing a fire in the turbine hall of the Exhibition Center of the Kirov Railway. AP-5 was used, I don't remember the brand of powder. Localization and liquidation took just over a minute. The area of ​​the fire, as far as I remember, was approx. 200m2, room height -3m. The only negative - after the fire, it was necessary to vacuum immediately so that the powder does not crumble. By the way, in the Soviet Union there was another powerful tool - a gas-water extinguishing vehicle.