The Public Chamber will file thousands of claims against Ukraine with the ECHR

The Public Chamber (OP) of Russia gathered 17 thousand claims to Ukraine, which it intends to file with the European Court of Human Rights, reports RIA News with reference to a member of the OP Georgy Fedorov.

“The Public Chamber of the Russian Federation and other human rights organizations have collected materials on 17 of thousands of lawsuits against the state of Ukraine and intend to file them with the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). Each lawsuit tells about the violation of the rights of one person or one family during military operations in the east of Ukraine ", - said Fedorov.

About 500 lawsuits have already been filed, of which around 400 has been accepted. As a rule, victims require compensation in the amount of 300 thousand rubles.

“Therefore, if the ECtHR satisfies all 17 thousands of lawsuits, Ukraine will cost around 5 billion,” the publication calculated, specifying that lawsuit sessions could begin as early as this year.

Comments

[Alexander_K]

What will you take from a bankrupt?

[siberalt]

Yeah. ECHR now works years on 50

[Ist]

Quote: siberalt

Yeah. ECHR now works years on 50

Remember Chechnya, too, there were claims only no one would pay them. This is a simple concussion and translation of paper. And of course, for lawyers

[Andrea]

Quote: Ist

Remember Chechnya, too, there were claims only no one would pay them. This is a simple concussion and translation of paper. And of course, for lawyers

Here you are not right. The decisions of the Strasbourg court in relation to private individuals are binding (speech on the prestige of the state)

[Ist]

Quote: Andrea

Quote: Ist

Remember Chechnya, too, there were claims only no one would pay them. This is a simple concussion and translation of paper. And of course, for lawyers

Here you are not right. The decisions of the Strasbourg court in relation to private individuals are binding (speech on the prestige of the state)

Yes of course:

Russia should execute decisions of the ECHR and other international courts only if they do not contradict the Constitution and Russian legislation, Federation Council Speaker Valentina Matvienko said at a press conference following the spring session. "If we are imposed on alien postulates that do not correspond to the Constitution, then we have no right to fulfill them. Violation of the Constitution is the biggest sin in legislation," she said.
The speaker noted that the Strasbourg court "is increasingly beginning to make decisions of a politicized nature under certain pressure." She expects this trend to grow.

It will also be from the Ukrainian side, where the ASU laws are stamped only by the rustle of the buttons

[aleks 62]

..... (we are talking about the prestige of the state) ....


... And what prestige does Urkaina have ???? ..... They are in my opinion - everything is purple .... And prestige including ....

[GUS]

Quote: siberalt

Yeah. ECHR now works years on 50

You do not know the gay-gay fagots - they will reject 16900 for formal or far-fetched reasons.

[twigs]

Quote: siberalt

Yeah. ECHR now works years on 50

So let him work, and not suffer garbage.

[siberalt]

Yeah. ECHR now works forward for 50 years

[Shick]

The ECHR acts in the interests of Europe and the United States. So without illusions, gentlemen

[Andrea]

Quote: Shick
The ECHR acts in the interests of Europe and the United States. So without illusions, gentlemen

You can’t argue against the facts, nor what standards will help, it’s bad that they will be considered for several years. By that time, an adequate government may come and the country will become completely different, but you’ll have to pay anyway. By the way, I think the lawsuits will be tens of times more.

[novobranets]

Quote: Shick

So without illusions, gentlemen

Nobody harbors any illusions. The fact of filing claims is important. Well, if at the same time it turns out to tear a tuft of wool with a lousy Svidomo sheep, then the victims, I think, will not mind, in the ruined shelling of Donbass, every penny counts.

[kostiknet]

Quote: Aleksandr_K

What will you take from a bankrupt?

Analyzes only, and even those with worms ...

[jdcjd]

Quote: Aleksandr_K

What will you take from a bankrupt?

Territories. And banderlog for meat.

[WKS]

Quote: Aleksandr_K

What will you take from a bankrupt?

With a black sheep, even a tuft of wool ...

[twigs]

Quote: Aleksandr_K

What will you take from a bankrupt?

there is overseas property the court will arrest and sell will refund

[EGOrkka]

Alexander_K
What will you take from a bankrupt?

Land to the people, traitors to the gallows, money to the country, bullies in Europe .....

[Decathlon]

And does anyone on the site have information from the court practice of the ECHR on actually compensated damage ?!

[oleg-gr]

Right. It’s time to get Euroopeichev to work against the Ukrobandera. Maybe then their brains will turn on and learn a lot.

[Vadim12]

I read the recipe for filling the Ukrainian budget: you need to run a lottery with a super prize: a lifelong repose from serving in the Armed Forces. Money to the treasury will flow like a river!

[ALEA IACTA EST]

The point of messing with this ECHR? Anyway, this puppet organization will not make a decision against Ukraine.

[avvg]

That's right, we must be realistic The European Court will not decide anything. Donbass can achieve freedom and human rights, only with arms in hand.

[zurbagan63]

To the heap and to Yukos sue)

[ya.seliwerstov2013]

Each lawsuit describes a violation of the rights of one person or one family during hostilities in eastern Ukraine, ”Fedorov said.

Fedorov said that the ECtHR rejected the first lawsuits against Ukraine for far-fetched reasons, but now it accepts complaints for consideration.

“For example, we were returned a lawsuit claiming that there was no applicant’s signature. And then we checked - both the signature, and everything that is needed is there, ”the human rights activist recalls. - But now, when claims are being received by them in droves, they are not rejected. Moreover, now we compose them absolutely flawlessly. ”

At the same time, according to a member of the expert council under the Commissioner for Human Rights, lawyer Karina Enko, the European Institute can consider the claims of Ukrainians against the government for more than one year.

However, the lawyer Vadim Klyuvgant told the publication that the complaints are homogeneous, and the ECHR can combine them. “There is such a category as priority, but the applicant must justify why his complaint should be considered on a priority basis,” the lawyer said, adding that no specific deadlines, even for “priority” complaints, have yet been established.

[Dies Irae]

That is, we, Russia, are ready to ignore the decisions of the European courts in the decision on the Yukos case, for example, but are we ready to file claims against Ukraine in a European court? Guys, this is hypocrisy and "double standards" for which we despise both America and Europe. Let's be consistent?

[Andryukha]

On the other hand, we are forced to implement a politically motivated decision. Why can't we enforce international standards? It is necessary to somehow counter the inhumane actions against the population. By the way, we should expect that type-officials of the country U will yell that they are ready to sue millions of cases. But! Only yell.

[Dies Irae]

Quote: Andryukha

On the other hand, we are forced to implement a politically motivated decision. Why can't we enforce international standards?

Because we ourselves declared this "decision" - "politically motivated". Because it is beneficial for us. And I agree with that. I do not agree with the fact that after such a decisive demarche I myself go to European courts with claims.

Quote: Andryukha

It is necessary to somehow counter the inhumane actions against the population.

This is not our population.
This is not our country.
We should not get involved in other people's squabbles, but should think only about the welfare of their own state.

Quote: vitaliy.rnd

Or maybe let's act as it is beneficial to us? You cannot play by the rules with those who ignore these rules.

Let's. I am only "for" - with all hands.
It's just that in this case, it was we who ignored the "rules" that we voluntarily accepted a little earlier.

Quote: udincev

The suit of Yukos is a political, executed order in the war (remember the informational situation when the decision was made).

Taste. Unproven statement. There is only one truth - it is a decision extremely disadvantageous to Russia.

Quote: udincev

Let's remember the Malaysian Boeing. Investigation "open and operational" under the crocodile tears and threats to the designated culprit - the top of "democracy, integrity and justice"

The threats were not voiced by the commission of inquiry - the joint commission - but by individual states that used the incident for their own purposes. It is logical and predictable.

Quote: udincev

Compare with the violated rights and lives of citizens U.

They interest me in a million times less rights, lives, well-being my fellow citizens.

Quote: udincev

Top of the "sequence" of Democracy.

"Democracy" - what is it? Form of government or a separate state? Many completely democratic states did not support the persecution of Russia. Or do they have the "wrong" democracy? Czech Republic, Spain, Italy, Greece ... no, I don't understand you.

Quote: imugn

Citizens have the right to file lawsuits against Ukraine and it does not matter if the state, whose citizens they are, recognizes any decision of this court in another case. No double standards.

That's right, with one exception - Ukrainians not citizens of Russia.

[vitaliy.rnd]

Or maybe let's act as it is beneficial to us? You cannot play by the rules with those who ignore these rules.

[udincev]

Quote: Dies Irae

Let's be consistent?

Let's.
Yukos' lawsuit is a political one, a fulfilled order in the war (remember the information environment when the decision was made). Let's remember the Malaysian Boeing. Investigation "open and operational" under the crocodile tears and threats to the designated culprit - the top of "democracy, integrity and justice"
Compare with the violated rights and lives of citizens U.
The conclusion about double standards does not even need to be voiced! All clear.
Top of the "sequence" of Democracy.

[imugn]

Citizens have the right to file lawsuits against Ukraine and it does not matter if the state, whose citizens they are, recognizes any decision of this court in another case. No double standards.

[provincial]

"The Public Chamber will submit thousands of claims against Ukraine to the ECHR" - the officials of the ECHR will carry these claims to the toilet for use as toilet paper. The holy simplicity of our citizens. That the West is so blind and did not see what is happening in Ukraine?

[Andryukha]

In chess, this is called a fork. Do not recognize the lawsuit - you lose the credibility of the international court, the basis of the Western worldview and money in the lawsuit of Yukos and others. You admit - you admit that Europe supports the monsters. Those. these claims will be as long as possible. But I think this is not the last blow both from our side and from the enemy.

[udincev]

Quote: provincial

ECHR officials take these claims to the toilet for use as toilet paper

Which is unsafe.
It is easy, following the lawsuits in this case, to the ECHR officials to go after the toilet paper.

[Ist]

Madhouse on the road! What suits? Which ECHR? Kiev does not pay for Eurobonds, even if according to Vysotsky’s testament they write to Sportloto right away

[Andryukha]

You can kill with one strong blow,
Forcing that before can be done with a few strokes, but not strong ones.
To properly educate, you need to beat constantly, but gently.
Do you catch a thought?

[vitaliy.rnd]

And you think that the ESCP recognizes Ukraine at least in one lawsuit?

[HAM]

A dead donkey has only ears!

[udincev]

Quote: vitaliy.rnd

And you think that the ESCP recognizes Ukraine at least in one lawsuit?

Then it will be a little more visible that there is an ESCP in fact.
In any case, claims are correct.

[vitaliy.rnd]

Who knows better? Us? So we already see all this for a long time. And the Europeans at least cc eye ....

[Evgeni]

Quote: Dies Irae

That is, we, Russia, are ready to ignore the decisions of the European courts in the decision on the Yukos case, for example, but are we ready to file claims against Ukraine in a European court? Guys, this is hypocrisy and "double standards" for which we despise both America and Europe. Let's be consistent?

it's not us / Russia is suing the ECHR, but the citizens of Ukraine

[Alexey RA]

The Public Chamber (OP) of Russia has collected 17 thousand lawsuits against Ukraine, which it intends to file with the European Court of Human Rights

DoS attack.

[Andryukha]

I’m also thinking that it would be nice to file lawsuits against politicians who accuse me, a citizen of my country, of aggression. For example, 5 rubles. This is just the moral trauma I received while I was reading news feeds.

[hohkn]

Quote: Alexey RA

The Public Chamber (OP) of Russia has collected 17 thousand lawsuits against Ukraine, which it intends to file with the European Court of Human Rights

DoS attack.

Do you think they hang?

[udincev]

Crush by any means.
"They" are not shy about choosing the means!

[VNP1958PVN]

Their trial is too predictable. As from overseas "advise" -so and sentenced.

[Prutkov]

Quote: Dies Irae

That is, we, Russia, are ready to ignore the decisions of the European courts in the decision on the Yukos case, for example, but are we ready to file claims against Ukraine in a European court? Guys, this is hypocrisy and "double standards" for which we despise both America and Europe. Let's be consistent?

If you do not understand, then the lawsuits are filed by citizens of Ukraine. Lawyers of the public chamber only help to draw up documents. This is not a lawsuit from Russia to Ukraine. And given that Ukraine is Tse Europe, that by signing the political part of the agreement on Euro-association, Ukraine fully recognized the supremacy of European legislation. FURTHER WILL BE MORE MORE FUN - RESTITUTION.

[Dies Irae]

Lawyers of the Public Chamber of Russia, please note.
Not the bitter fate of the fire victims, but this word - "Russia" will catch the eye of everyone and everyone.

Quote: Rods

And given that Ukraine is Tse Europe, that by signing the political part of the agreement on Euro-association, Ukraine fully recognized the supremacy of European legislation.

So we recognized the supremacy ... did not give a damn about this "supremacy" when it became unprofitable. Ugly, but practical, I personally support this.

Quote: Rods

FURTHER WILL BE MORE MORE FUN - RESTITUTION.

Restitution applies only to countries that are full members of the European Union.
Restitution never affects Ukraine.

[veksha50]

And what, they say all the time about the hybrid war - well, so, one of its elements ... Without any weapons, blood and murders, like this, a lawsuit will be brought against several lards - even if they won’t give it away, but it’s beating them nerves .. .

PS For the first time I treated the word "human rights organization" without disgust, and even with respect ... Well done, guys !!! The chicken is pecking by the grain, slowly and peck this unfinished country ...

[olimpiada15]

Claims must be formalized and filed, only while it is very small. The point is not even when they will be considered and whether these people will be able to get compensation. The presence of a massive flow of lawsuits is an undeniable fact proving a violation of human rights in relation to citizens of a country, i.e. the current regime is not so flawless.
It would be nice to add claims from those called up to the ATO zone, whose call is a violation of the Ukrainian constitution, since martial law has not been declared and their call is a violation of constitutional rights.
Here it is necessary to allocate money to lawyers engaged in carrying out work on filing claims from citizens of Ukraine at the ECHR.

[Procrust]

Let us reason logically: Ukraine is Europe? Yes. Then the decisions of the ECHR on the claims of citizens of Ukraine against part of Europe (Ukraine) are binding. And the point.
Summary: it is necessary to file claims with the ECHR! 17.000 not aisle ...

[Alexandr2637]

Where where? To the Gayropei court? Well ... They’ll blame Russia for everything.

[Tor5]

Wait and see...

[morozik]

about Ukraine ... the seer Zhirinovsky in 1998 ... as he looked into the water

[olegkrava]

And who will now say that he was wrong?

[vladimirw]

they won’t pay, but probably there won’t be a positive decision, the black barrack is strong and angry

[vsav5660]

To sue Ukraine is not to respect freedom and democracy. Do not respect America and the entire world community. Would think when sent.

[mamont5]

Quote: siberalt

Yeah. ECHR now works years on 50

Less will be engaged in any nonsense.