Submarine B-262 "Stary Oskol" handed over to the Russian Navy

53
Today (June 25) the Stary Oskol diesel-electric submarine in St. Petersburg has been handed over to the Russian Navy the fleet. More precisely, the Black Sea Fleet of the Russian Federation. B-262 "Stary Oskol" - the third boat of project 636, which is introduced into the Russian Navy. Information Agency TASS publishes data from a source in the Main Committee of the Russian Navy:

Today in St. Petersburg, the acceptance report of the third submarine of the 636 project for the Black Sea Fleet was signed. Officially, the submarine will enter the fleet combat only after raising the flag of St. Andrew. The ceremony will be held as part of the International Naval Salon in St. Petersburg, tentatively July 3. The 4 series boat, the Krasnodar, will be handed over to the Russian Navy in November of this year. The fifth and sixth submarines - Veliky Novgorod and Kolpino fleet will receive in November 2016 of the year.


Submarine B-262 "Stary Oskol" handed over to the Russian Navy


Multipurpose submarines of the 636.3 "Varshavyanka" project are being built by Admiralty Shipyards of St. Petersburg. The designer of submarines of this type is the Rubin Central Design Bureau of Marine Technology (chief designer is Nikolai Kvasha). The construction of the B-262 "Stary Oskol" was launched in 2012.
53 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +18
    25 June 2015 18: 52
    HOORAY!!! Another submarine as part of the Black Sea Fleet of the RF Armed Forces, which means our border has become more reliably protected
    1. +3
      25 June 2015 19: 05
      The news is just great. Interestingly, is the infrastructure ready?
      1. +4
        25 June 2015 19: 07
        All hands on deck ) drinks
        1. +21
          25 June 2015 19: 18
          Everything is a reason to go to the store. The submarine named after my city introduced the composition of the Navy. fellow drinks
      2. +4
        25 June 2015 19: 45
        Quote: Hauptmann Emil
        The news is just great. Interestingly, is the infrastructure ready?

        I think it will not stand on the raid. In Novorossiysk base submarine should be built in 2016 year
        1. 0
          25 June 2015 19: 51
          Well, if so. And it may turn out that the boats are being built, but they forgot about the infrastructure or didn’t get the money.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. Alex_NW
      -5
      25 June 2015 21: 09
      messed up on the marshal
  2. Alex_NW
    -29
    25 June 2015 18: 55
    what tasks will she solve? expensive analogue of the bastion?
    1. +13
      25 June 2015 19: 00
      The scarecrow function is also very important for military equipment. A submarine looks much more menacing in the eyes of our partners. In addition, the submarine can enter the Mediterranean Sea to strengthen our very weak group there.
      1. +3
        25 June 2015 23: 49
        Multipurpose submarines in the territorial seas solve, first of all, the problem not of "going somewhere", but so that no one would go there. Incl. and other people's submarines - this is about a kament about an analogue of "Bastion".
    2. +9
      25 June 2015 19: 14
      don't take it seriously, it's more about Russophobic representatives of one nation:
      1. Alex_NW
        -23
        25 June 2015 19: 54
        For me, apart from the nuclear submarine’s strategists, they’re also able to dabble in a puddle. Remember Tsushima-if they don’t let out
        1. +8
          25 June 2015 22: 03
          NPS IN THE BLACK AND BALTIC SEAS CANNOT SOLVE THEIR PROBLEMS IMPOSSIBLE TO THEM!
          with all due respect.
        2. +1
          26 June 2015 00: 37
          I advise you to study the matter more thoroughly, before drawing conclusions, by the way in the USA, boats of this class cannot be built, and let it be released from which direction!
    3. +3
      25 June 2015 19: 49
      what tasks will she solve? expensive analogue of the bastion?
      And safety will always be expensive! This only unexpected danger is always free!
      1. +2
        25 June 2015 19: 53
        you don’t understand the eccentric! he who does not want to understand does not understand at all!
        1. Alex_NW
          -15
          25 June 2015 19: 58
          The Bosphorus will be locked and all
          1. +3
            25 June 2015 22: 57
            The Bosphorus will "lock" our mines and our diesel submarines.
            with all due respect.
          2. +2
            25 June 2015 23: 23
            And the cruise missiles in her launch mines are the same?
          3. +2
            25 June 2015 23: 38
            Quote: Alex_NW
            The Bosphorus will be locked and all

            The Montreux Convention prohibits the closure of the Bosphorus even in wartime. Of course, if we are not fighting against Turkey. That is, to close the straits, this means to declare war on Russia. Does the Turks need this?
            1. +2
              25 June 2015 23: 54
              Conventions end with the first shot.
              And that's why the fleet is in the Black Sea Fleet, in order to prevent the deployment of a strike group of "partners" there ...
          4. +1
            26 June 2015 04: 01
            Quote: Alex_NW
            The Bosphorus will be locked and all

            How to explain clearly. In peacetime, this is a "case for Bella", and in wartime, there were a couple of plans in the USSR, in which the coasts of the "straits" turned into scorched earth for 30 km in all directions.
    4. The comment was deleted.
    5. +2
      25 June 2015 23: 10
      Quote: Alex_NW
      what tasks will she solve? expensive analogue of the bastion?

      In principle, yes, only away from the coast of the Motherland.
      Andreevsky flag on "Stary Oskol" has not yet been raised, and the Yankees have already dubbed this boat the main threat to NAVY
    6. +1
      26 June 2015 03: 57
      Quote: Alex_NW
      What tasks will she solve?

      Set by the command. When training, and when fighting ...
      But the presence of submarines at sea will greatly irritate our "NATO partners". While their "Bastions" are frightening away, but aviation is scaring, and now it is not yet known from what point of the sea missiles from submarines can go to them. In short, we "lock" the Black Sea
  3. +2
    25 June 2015 18: 58
    Well, another count has arrived ...

    Only now when it really goes into operation on the Black Sea - that's the question ... It would be nice, at least by the fall ...

    When there are at least three of them at the Black Sea Fleet, the NATO scumbags will have to hang more nervously along the Black Sea ...
    1. +1
      25 June 2015 19: 02
      Let the NATO scams itch in the most indecent places ...
    2. 0
      25 June 2015 22: 50
      What an autumn, what are you talking about, "Novorossiysk" for the second year already at the Northern Fleet has been undergoing all in-depth tests, "Rostov-on-Don" has been there since spring. Earlier next year at the Black Sea Fleet Stary Oskol and do not wait
  4. +13
    25 June 2015 18: 58
    Thank! Needed! We wait ! good

  5. +5
    25 June 2015 18: 59
    Let's be nice, come on. Black Sea Fleet, these boats are now urgently needed.
  6. +3
    25 June 2015 19: 00
    Seven Feet Rod Keel Brothers!
  7. +2
    25 June 2015 19: 00
    Another splinter for NATO ....., happy!
  8. +3
    25 June 2015 19: 00
    But the tasks are simple - protecting the borders of Russia and protecting its interests. soldier
  9. +2
    25 June 2015 19: 01
    Well, at least something for the fleet is being built on time. Let's hope that in the construction of large surface ships in a few years we will reach the same pace.
  10. serdjo871
    0
    25 June 2015 19: 06
    the more boats the better
  11. +6
    25 June 2015 19: 08
    We do not have submarines. Well, except that the atominars of political worker Cherkashin. And everything else is submarines.
    1. 0
      26 June 2015 07: 09
      But at least how else to name the main thing that it fulfills its goal!
  12. +1
    25 June 2015 19: 11
    meaning our border has become more secure
    what tasks will she solve? expensive analogue of the bastion?

    svp67, alex_NVV. I will answer both of you at once (sorry for such a compilation). Straits !!! There are no weapons in the Black Sea, so that no infection can enter better than boats! Just as with Japan, the question of passing our fleet "back and forth" through the shallow Far Eastern straits is now being resolved by personal presence.
    Seven feet under the keel, you!
    1. +2
      25 June 2015 19: 15
      Just as with Japan, the question of passing our fleet "back and forth" through the shallow Far Eastern straits is now being resolved by personal presence.

      I did not understand your idea ...
      1. 0
        25 June 2015 19: 38
        Let me explain. With Japan, as with the "unsinkable US aircraft carrier" we have big problems. Our Pacific fleet is actually locked in shallow straits, which are controlled by the "great minke" by means of "self-defense type" forces, and the Sashiks in the straits (and this is from Kamchatka to the south of Kyushu and a little further south) have enough of their own to even block our nuclear submarines completely in these waters, which means that the Sashiki consider the blow from there to be ineffective. IMHO - GDP in Japan will agree not on gas supplies (there is Miller for this), but for straits and a pass or not a pass. Since the time of Nicholas II (who received a saber in the head from a Yupponian policeman), VVP is the first Russian at this level.
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. 0
            25 June 2015 23: 44
            Hint - Bering Strait laughing
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. +6
          25 June 2015 20: 40
          Quote: NDR-791
          Yes, and their funds at the Sashiks in the straits (and this is from Kamchatka to the south of Kyushu and even a little to the south) is enough to even completely block our nuclear submarines in these waters, which means that the Sashiki consider the impact from there to be ineffective.

          Not quite clear. The entire chain of the Kuril Islands from the southern tip of the Kamchatka Peninsula (Cape Lopatka) to the southern tip of the Kurile Island of Kunashir and the Habomai Islands are the territory of Russia. Up to the large Japanese island of Hokkaido. And all the straits in this ridge are controlled by Russia. And its military means and the Russian Navy. These Russian straits are to be calculated at least 20. And the length of this island Russian arc is 1160 kilometers in a straight line. On the Google map I measured, look. And this is very, very much !!! So how can sashiks (i.e. the USA) lock up the Russian Pacific Fleet through the Kuril straits ??? Russia and Russians, if in the future there is enough mind, then, of course, they will not give way to Japan and the cliffs of a separate one, 0,03 km. sq. in this archipelago. Not to mention the transfer to Japan of 325 km square. land of the Small Kuril ridge (225 km. sq. Shikotan + 100 km. sq. Habomai). According to the joint memorandum in 1956 (prelude to the peace treaty). Although this is only 7% of the claimed claims of Japan to the South Kuril Islands. And no more than 3% of the land area of ​​all the Kuril Islands, which are completely under the control of Russia.
        4. +1
          26 June 2015 04: 08
          I explain to your explanation. The submarine base is located on the Kamchatka Peninsula. There are no shallow straits. Direct access to the Akean Sea. And the Straits are not an obstacle in the Kuril Islands.
    2. Alex_NW
      -2
      25 June 2015 22: 17
      In the Black Sea, so that no infection comes in better than boats there are no weapons! And do we or Turkey decide who will come or not? And where does so much confidence come from that we will have the initiative of actions?
  13. 0
    25 June 2015 19: 17
    Good news! smile
    Novorossiysk base of the Navy is waiting! soldier
    1. 0
      26 June 2015 09: 01
      It is rather Varshavyanka waiting for the base)))
  14. +1
    25 June 2015 19: 27
    Hooray, hooray, hooray! drinks Question to experts: when to wait for them in the Black Sea?
  15. +3
    25 June 2015 19: 56
    And here is the missile cruiser "Marshal Ustinov" What power! Rumor has it that next year he may replace the "Moscow" while she is under repair, as the flagship of the Black Sea Fleet! In my opinion, there is a reason for this. Interestingly, onyxes will be on "Ustinov"?
  16. 0
    25 June 2015 20: 23
    Good luck!
  17. 0
    25 June 2015 20: 52
    All surface ships are cannon meat. For 15 minutes sovromennigo battle. It is not all. The main thing would have had time to work out on targets. But the submariners are zealous force. The Black Sea belongs to Russia by right.
    1. Alex_NW
      -2
      25 June 2015 22: 22
      For what, searched, did not find
  18. +5
    25 June 2015 21: 23
    happy sailing Stary Oskol !!! good
  19. +2
    25 June 2015 21: 29
    Modern multi-purpose boats with cruise missiles have become a terrible weapon. Previously, only surface and underwater targets could be destroyed, now missiles and the coast will be cleared.
  20. 0
    25 June 2015 21: 50
    Seven feet under the keel!
  21. 0
    25 June 2015 22: 09
    Quote: Hauptmann Emil
    Well, if so. And it may turn out that the boats are being built, but they forgot about the infrastructure or didn’t get the money.

    92 billion rubles were allocated for the construction of the Novorossiysk naval base until 2020.
  22. +1
    25 June 2015 22: 34
    I welcome everyone! Good news, and that the number of dives should be equal to the number of ascent!
  23. 0
    25 June 2015 22: 36
    How will submarines be transferred to the Black Sea? Around or along the rivers?
  24. +2
    25 June 2015 22: 48
    Quote: Alex_NW
    For what, searched, did not find

    By right of the strong, did not hear? It is ours for almost 300 almost.
  25. +2
    25 June 2015 23: 31
    Quote: w3554152
    How will submarines be transferred to the Black Sea? Around or along the rivers?

    And no difference. They can both along rivers and through straits
  26. +1
    25 June 2015 23: 36
    Quote: KnightRider
    Interestingly, onyxes will be on "Ustinov"?

    Most likely. At least there were persistent rumors that at least the Vulkan-Granit anti-ship missiles would be replaced with onyx on both the Atlant and nuclear cruisers in the process of repair and modernization. how true - hz
  27. 0
    26 June 2015 03: 07
    I think that for the Black Sea Fleet and the existing fleet there will be enough. One Bastion closes the entire water area practically. In Novorossiysk, there will be one more Bastion, and in general it will be under our supervision. And new ships and boats at the Black Sea Fleet are being introduced to form the Mediterranean squadron. That would be something to go out into the open sea, so to speak ... And the base in Novorossiysk is now possible to build under this squadron.
    1. 0
      26 June 2015 08: 56
      The base in Novorossiysk was built because of the unreliability of the "Ukrainian partners". Could have trampled from Sevastopol. As well as THREAD in the Kuban instead of the Crimean.
  28. 0
    26 June 2015 05: 20
    the faster this boat embarks on combat duty at the World Cup the better ...
  29. 0
    26 June 2015 10: 30
    BE HEALTH RUSSIAN SEAFARERS AND SHIPS !!!!!! SEVEN FEET UNDER THE KEEL !!!!!!!!!!!! drinks
  30. +1
    28 June 2015 16: 42
    great news! Radar "Monolith" - "will highlight the target", and Varshavyanka from the most unpredictable place will strike.
    already 3 boats in the Black Sea Fleet i.e. BC at least 36 cruise missiles + torpedoes.