"Army-2015". Polygon Alabino. Photo report

Unfortunately, the display of technology at the Alabino test site was somewhat reduced that day. But that was, that was.

I am sure that everyone who got into the frame does not need a presentation, therefore there is no point in the comments.

I do not know how much here "Shell" gave in a straight line, but ran away from the camera.








That kind of old horse. But - combat.


















And on the "Abrams" weak so sign? Nothing will fall off?




Having rolled back, the crews moved to the shore of the water sector and watched what was happening there.






















That seems to be the 21 century. Technology and all that. But a stick, two ropes - and Iskander is ready.




As the rocket men later said: "But nothing will break suddenly."

Thanks to everyone who liked my photos. Thanks to those who put a minus. I wish you to continue to korezhil from what we have equipment. Fighting and strong. Photos will still be a lot. And combat vehicles - even more.

Comments

[Tatar-in]

I wonder if Armata is also able to jump without consequences?

[Manul]

Quote: Tatar-in

I wonder if Armata is also able to jump without consequences?

Tanks with torsion bar suspension jump without consequences. But those who have hydro-pneumatics can change their ground clearance (Octopus, for example, was also made with hydro-pneumatics - half a meter of variable clearance, it can fall on the belly!). But Abrams seems to have a combined suspension - the 1st and 7th rollers are hydraulic, the rest are torsion bars (that is, jumping is contraindicated). But the information on the Internet is somehow vague. Specialists need to be asked. Maybe the professor knows? Although he probably doesn’t look at our pictures
PS Thank you Roman for the selection! We look forward to continuing!

[Forest]

All tanks jump, even the 70-ton Leo 2A7, except for the T-64 - it has a very delicate suspension.

[jjj]

Guys at these pictures look love-expensive. Not all naked aunts to look at. Here even emotions are stronger

[Vasek]

Quote: jjj

Guys at these pictures look love-expensive.

Add a picture from my collection.
Of course, this is not Alabino, and not a tank, but let the bourgeoisie try to repeat:

[Firstvanguard]

And on the "Abrams" weak so sign? Nothing will fall off?

The vertebrae of the driver.
Everyone can jump, jump 2 times, far from all

[cth; fyn]

M1A1 Abrams could still jump, there are photos and videos in nete. Subsequent modifications are already heavier and a bit, quite a bit falling apart. But it should be borne in mind that there is still a lot of M1A1 on the mainland of the USA, and M2 and M2sep they are mainly abroad in expeditionary buildings.

[prosto_rgb]

My favorite photo reports !!!
The author is huge as always thank you

And on the "Abrams" so weak leap?

Siganut is Not weak, but only then it is dragged on a tank carrier for overhaul of the chassis.

[ILIA]

Equip ordinary sea containers with missiles))) and carry them around the world on a container ship))) for the time being ... it is most likely already implemented ..

[416D]

Roman, thanks for the photo report. Yesterday I read that there seemed to be modernized "Terminators" exhibited there. Did not notice ?

[eplewke]

The Terminator stood alone at the UVZ stand, modernized. But this is in the showroom at the "Patriot" Exhibition and Convention Center. I was not noticed in active actions at the Alabino training ground.

[inkass_98]

Thanks to those who put the cons.

Yes, there seems to be no downsides? Or is it for past reports? So this is from an excess of feelings, "beats means loves"

[fzr1000]

What kind of tank is in the caponier on the 22 photo, next to the springboard?

[Aleks tv]

Quote: fzr1000

What kind of tank is in the caponier on the 22 photo, next to the springboard?

?
Sergey, on 24 photo:
- on the T-72Б3 springboard.
- in the trench target T-62M.
...

Novel:

So in Moscow there is now an analogue of Tagil ...
Only in the Urals is it more "Polygon-exhibition", where the demonstration of driving at the tankodrome and shooting at the headmistress is main the event, and the exhibition is an additional one (although now it is already on the same level).

How is it? Just curious...
Is the exhibition the main feature of the event?

[rubber duck]

The exhibition, that is to say, the Patriot Kvc is the main action, all the clusters are "secondary", the tank museum is among them.

[wanderer_032]

Quote: Aleks tv

Only in the Urals it is more of a "Polygon-exhibition", where the demonstration of driving at the tankodrome and shooting at the headmistress is the main event, and the exhibition is an additional one (although now it is at the same level).

Hi Alexey!

Right on target. About the director.

[Aleks tv]

Quote: wanderer_032

Hi Alexey!

Darova, Sasha.


Ours gathered again in Tagil ...
It seems like how many times he was, it’s a little boring, but ... FSE is equal to hotz.

[wanderer_032]

Novel. The photos are excellent - no doubt. But the show itself is kind of boring ...
He does not reveal the potential capabilities of this technique, at least a bit.

For example, what is the point of demonstrating the defeat of a ground target by ZRAK "Pantsir" if it is ZRAK?
Those. anti-aircraft defense, which was originally intended to defeat the targets.
I understand that launching missiles is an expensive business, but was it not possible to demonstrate how the Pantsir air defense missile system hits air targets?
Even if the drone some of the most overwhelming for these purposes would be allowed for disposal ...

Or showing the running capabilities of armored vehicles.
Wasn’t it possible to equip the track with more serious obstacles?
And the fur-water guys would only be happy to demonstrate their real skills in driving military equipment, to those whom they are called to defend and for whom they serve.
And so is boredom. They showed driving at the level of cadets from the training, which they just recently put on leverage ...

Or here shooting from a place. What could be interesting about this?
Machine commanders and gunners would show their real distance and ability to hit suddenly appearing / moving targets on the move. In a straight line, on board overcoming obstacles as in battle, this is done.
There would be a lot of enthusiasm from the public; journalists would try to make such materials - sweetie.
And the crew guys themselves would have felt differently. The status and image of the army could be raised in the eyes of the audience, especially among young boys who themselves will join the army in 3-4 years.
Is it really a pity for the MO to spend a couple of training discs or OFSs on this? And if you put a couple of barrels with a solarium under the target, then it was guaranteed to be more spectacular, all this could be done.

Again, young people could be drawn into the army.
The main one can be such a slogan at this event: "Can you do this ?!"
Or "Do you want to be able to do the same ?! - enlist in the tank troops of the Russian Federation"!

[wanderer_032]

That seems to be the 21 century. Technology and all that. But a stick, two ropes - and Iskander is ready.



But about this one in the TPM "jamb".
Could it really be impossible to deliver the hydraulic manipulator so that only one TZM operator could load missiles into the launcher?

Here, even a technique and even more advanced one is used in logging:

[max702]

For that, nothing will break ...
And it would not be bad to put "long arms" cranes on most of the "tactical" trucks of the Ministry of Defense, how much time and effort they save .. But so far the principle is Two soldiers replace the excavator! Do not be this ..

[Aleksandr1981]

The rocket is much heavier !!!!! This toy only logs can! A heavier like a rocket can not, the payload is not the same!

[eplewke]

From the stands you will not see these moving targets. The goals there are simple, where you have not beaten with quadruple. And you say. Sense ??? Such things demonstrate in private shows. And then ordinary people froze with fear when Msta-s just shot in the air ... There was enough trash, believe me.

[Andrey77]

Two ropes - for insurance. As if embarrassment in front of the audience did not work. This does not bother the troops.

[Leeder]

I saw the "Shell" live. That same "Crazy Stool"!

[31rus]

Great photos, and the last signature is generally above all praise, Roman I ask for a photo of the new technology, well, there are so many more

[Gromm]

Great photos! Yes, more pictures please! To evil adversaries!

[Banson]

MBT T-72 is especially cool. As well as PT "Sprut". Here is a video of 402m drag racing between our T-72B (840hp) and T-64BM2 "Bulat" (850hp), which once again confirmed that the Ukrainian "horses" are not real. One of our horses costs 1,5-2 Ukrainian.

[Linda]

Roman, thank you so much for the selection!
T-72B3 is great!

[Banson]

Quote: Linda

T-72B3 is great!

T-72B3 certainly need to be redone.

[cth; fyn]

http://topwar.ru/35631-t-72b3chto-eto-za-zver-chast-1.html
After this article, I have a feeling that the combat efficiency is not only not increased, but also decreased.

[Vako]

Please do not forget about the small arms shown on the forum !!!!

[Raider]

You look at the photo and you understand ... it’s better to see it once in place than to see the photo a hundred times

[Sling]

Thanks to those who put the cons

And you all. I sin, but justify. I relate to this report ..... Excellent !!! Hold the composition - open the info, but a little, guessed? Readers are constantly in awe. In short, growth in professionalism: I am in my field (young, reaching for knowledge), you are Banshee, as a journalist, in your own. Well done, what do you say?

[Noncombatant]

"I wish you will continue to get distracted by what kind of equipment we have. Combat and strong."

First of all, thanks for the report. Beautiful and interesting.
Secondly, one can feel how Mr. Skomorokhov himself “rubs”, when his articles (not this one), but where he is engaged in “analytics”, are given “minuses”. Wounded conceit. It happens since