Passed the test tests of the updated armored SUV "Tiger A6"

Passed the test tests of the updated armored SUV "Tiger A6"

On the proving ground of the city of Arzamas passed the test tests of the updated armored SUV "Tiger A6", developed by specialists of the Arzamas engineering plant.


All-wheel-drive off-road "Tigr" is the largest and most powerful car of this class, produced in Russia. The advanced A6 model is a fusion of the latest technologies adapted to the Russian conditions of use - a powerful SUV will not be scared even by the winter streets of major cities, “cleaned” by road technology, not to mention the rural roads and other extreme conditions.

Tiger A6 differs from the basic version with improved ballistic protection, additional armor and a reinforced bottom, which made the car heavier. The novelty is intended for use in special units of the Ministry of Defense and the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation. According to the preliminary information, in the 6 year the state order will amount to 2012 units. Each car is estimated at 40 thousand dollars, it is three times less than the declared value of the main competitor of the "Tiger" - the Italian "Lynx".
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

25 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. olifus
    olifus 2 October 2011 13: 35 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    Each car is estimated at 100 thousand dollars, which is three times less than the declared value of the main competitor of the Tiger - the Italian Lynx.

    so one wonders why the hell are these "lynxes" to us, when can we put three times as many of our vehicles into the troops for the same money?
    1. Uhalus 2 October 2011 14: 47 New
      • 6
      • 0
      +6
      And not just more, but they are even better!

      And “Lynx” - so that there was something to cut, is it really not clear? :)

      And if in a boyish way, then I want myself just such a jipper! :))))))
      1. UAZ Patriot 2 October 2011 19: 55 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        +1 to the account))) but in general my opinion is that everything is done right — without our nail defenders feeling under their ass there would be no Tigers new, no Tagilov, no Typhoon, etc.
  2. Motherland
    Motherland 2 October 2011 13: 42 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    This is most likely just for comparison. As always, it’s better here.
  3. Rustam 2 October 2011 13: 52 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    so one wonders why the hell are these "lynxes" to us, when we can put three times as many of our vehicles into the troops for the same money
    ______________________
    if it weren’t for LYNX amz, he would never have made this creation and would have crammed old tiger patterns into us — HOW THE BROKEN FIRED IN THE SAME START UPDATES AND BUILDING UP THE MACHINE
    1. runway 2 October 2011 14: 28 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Rustam.
      It is advisable to add: after KAMAZ’s refusal to support Putin’s promising corruption project with his friend Berlusconi, and of course yours, Rustam, devastating comments against this project .... http: //www.topwar.ru/7294-proshli-testovye-ispytaniya -obnovlennogo-br
      onirovannogo-vnedorozhnika-tigr-a6.html #
    2. runway 2 October 2011 14: 36 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Rustam.
      It is advisable to add: after KAMAZ’s refusal to support this promisingly corrupt project of Putin’s promise with his “friend” Berlusconi, well, after yours, Rustam, devastating comments about this criminal conspiracy :-))))).
      1. Rustam 2 October 2011 18: 47 New
        • -4
        • 0
        -4
        KAMAZ has collected the first 1-0 units and is now closely involved in the typhoon

        and the production of Ivek will be moved to Voronezh !!!!!
        _______________________________
        Regarding the new tiger, I said that AMZ itself modernized its tiger without a pointer and at least approached world standards, it pleases !!!! (I put plus-cocurence)
        but even Tiger-6a still upsets me - this is a dead end option. It’s better to buy IvekU, because the mine resistance of IvekI under the bottom is 6 kg of TNT, and for Tiger-6a current 3 kg of TNT. True, the Tiger armored capsule has no weakened zones; moreover, there is anti-fragmentation protection. But all the same, the lag in the level of mine protection with a non-lateral explosion at Tiger-6a is catastrophic. And its construction reserves are exhausted. This is evidenced not only by its mine protection, but also by a loading capacity of 700 kg
        But the Tiger-6a can only be acceptable as a temporary measure, because with the mine technology in the army, excluding the BTR-82A, it is a complete problem. For the internal troops there’s nothing else, because theirs the Federal and the Highlander have no complete mine protection, moreover, the latter has a rather low
        PS-AND THE LATEST LYNX HAS PASSED TESTING AND EXPLOSION TESTS !! THE TIGER IS ONLY PREPARED (opa is already a plus BEFORE AMZ EMPLOYEES JUST FEAR THEM AS A FIRE) YES REMARK -40 pieces will be purchased in M-version in XNUMX
        1. runway 2 October 2011 20: 24 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Rustam.
          What you said about this is known.
          Comparative sea trials of the Tiger and the Lynx were shown in the video. (Lynx did not drive 5 meters in the snow). As for the demolition tests, I remember you ardently argued that the Lynx withstood a 20 kg HE blast !!!!
          I suppose you have no idea what a blast looks like under the bottom of this tin can of 122 mm ammunition (6 kg TNT)?
          Rustam, you claimed that you were always ready to admit your mistakes. What is stopping you from doing this now?
          1. Rustam 3 October 2011 23: 25 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            if that I am always with both hands
    3. Uhalus 2 October 2011 14: 48 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      It is also possible. Not a blessing in disguise.
    4. stas52 3 October 2011 06: 39 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      about iveko, I recommend reading the magazine "Technology and Armaments" issue 12 for 2010 year. Iveco and the Tiger were compared there, I tell you frankly Iveco lost
  4. kagorta 2 October 2011 14: 28 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Great kick theory for the military-industrial complex in action. Previously, the military-industrial complex said we could do it and you can buy it, but now the Moscow Region says we’ll buy what we want, and if you don’t let it, we’ll buy it in another place. But the conversation does not mean that they will buy one hundred percent.
  5. runway 2 October 2011 15: 26 New
    • 6
    • 0
    +6
    Creating a new tank, you can install 152 and a more powerful weapon on it, you can put the crew in an armored capsule, you can do anything .... You can’t just create a tank (and any type of weapon) WITHOUT A HEAD.
    The loss of our military-industrial complex will lead to the loss of the sovereignty of our state.
    If during the Great Patriotic War the country was able to organize as soon as possible the training of troops and command personnel lost in the first months of the war, then the loss of production of military equipment and weapons would be fatal for the country. The leadership of the country understood this and transferred the main production beyond the Urals.
    What our leaders are doing now indicates that they either do not understand what they are doing, or .....
  6. datur 2 October 2011 15: 44 New
    • -2
    • 0
    -2
    Well, at least some benefit from the stool lol
  7. zczczc
    zczczc 2 October 2011 15: 51 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    What rejoice?

    The novelty is intended for use in special forces of the Ministry of Defense and the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation.


    People bought 40 pieces to disperse for large cities. This machine with the name, like the Nazi tank, is for those who do not agree with the title of the article http://topwar.ru/7125-rossiya-dolzhna-ponyat-vvputina.html.
  8. Ivan Tarasov 2 October 2011 17: 04 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Tell me, what about the engine and transmission on a new domestic machine?
    1. borkovn
      borkovn 2 October 2011 20: 21 New
      • -1
      • 0
      -1
      Chagin-Champion Dakar could not win without an ENGINE-DETAIL-DIESEL, TRANSMISSION-ALIZON, SUSPENSION-DIMLER, TIRE-MICHEL. And this is a "real" KAMAZ. Everything else is just a dream. And the Russians like to ride on such a layout and say that do it yourself. Success!
      1. ytqnhfk
        ytqnhfk 3 October 2011 00: 34 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Read the rules of racing Dakar our friend! It clearly states that the vehicle cannot have foreign spare parts and assemblies designed or produced at a non-factory participant!
      2. ereke
        ereke 20 October 2011 09: 31 New
        • -1
        • 0
        -1
        Generally speaking correctly
        borkovn,
        And it’s not a secret to anyone that inside KAMAZA all the responsible mechanisms are the same Western French and Amer. Why are you so mercilessly minus him. He is telling the truth. And why are they trying to prove the opposite 9 times I notice and are tired of it specifically). Why is it so gone. From this whole of your Russian srach you will not become exactly great, other people will be angry at such an attitude and disrespect for them. I understand, of course, that the Great Russians want to prescribe not only spiritual greatness and historical greatness, but also technical navigating in everything and like the West is resting. But why so vilely minus him for the truth and turn everything into a srach proving the opposite. Is it possible to achieve greatness. And even the Chinese and the Amers do not do something wrong and say so and do not prescribe to themselves
  9. ZEBRASH
    ZEBRASH 2 October 2011 17: 59 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Good smile But 40 pieces a year ... belay
  10. serezhafedotow
    serezhafedotow 2 October 2011 20: 14 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    If Rustam is right, then drive ,, Tiger-6a ,, fucking broom ...
  11. UAZ Patriot 2 October 2011 22: 32 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    TIGER A6 - sounds beautiful however!), A8 when? lol
    1. PSih2097 2 October 2011 22: 49 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      A8 when?

      8 is booking a tank along the way ....
      1. UAZ Patriot 2 October 2011 23: 37 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        not 8 this is an audi camping trip lol
  12. mind1954
    mind1954 3 October 2011 05: 17 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The conversation is kind of weird. How can our country
    on which everyone licks, to buy something for
    weapons. Samples for comparison, or even for
    copying unconditionally. So it was in our history
    repeatedly. And so where was the "market" in the USSR, so it
    in the military-industrial complex. Some UC, MIG, LaGG what are they, Polikarpova
    trampled. Constantly competition.
  13. Rustam 3 October 2011 12: 09 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Good. But 40 pieces a year ...
    _______________________
    40 pieces in the TIGER-M version !!!!!!!!!!


    If Rustam is right, then drive ,, Tiger-6a ,, fucking broom
    ___________________
    It is NOT necessary in comparison with previous versions this is a breakthrough, all thanks to iveko !!! tiger6kl is the initiative development of the military-industrial complex (military industrial company), that’s what I always wanted for our people to strive for world standards
    nothing after Interpolitech - God forbid that they fire at tests 90% will be in MOSCOW !!!! (my concern is mine protection)
    KEY TO PREVIOUS PREVIOUS VERSIONS OR GIFT TO AFRICA AND TD
    And I know because my close friend works in the military-industrial complex like this !! and we constantly argue with him and curse (friendly) of course

    I BELIEVE IN OUR ARMY IN BB NEEDS !! AND TIGERS BUY AND IVECO
  14. Vulkan raven 4 October 2011 10: 15 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Rustam, why are you misleading people?

    Mine resistance Iveco LMV (Lynx) is known - Level 2a, that is, 6kg BB under the wheel and 3kg BB under the bottom.

    The LMV is blast-protected to NATO-STANAG 4569 (able to withstand the blast from an equivalent of 7 kg of TNT under the wheel and 3 kg of TNT under the body).


    http://articles.janes.com/articles/Janes-Sentinel-Security-Assessment-Western-Eu
    rope / Procurement-Austria.html

    Schutz gegen die Wirkung einer Panzermine mit 7 kg Sprengstoff unter einem beliebigen Rad oder mit 3 kg unter dem Chassis.


    http://www.doppeladler.com/oebh/lmv.htm

    Confuses loading capacity of the Tiger-6A? But the load capacity of the LMV Lynx in 900kg does not bother?

    http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/835/826ffb05624de680ad9af6b.jpg/

    And what is the result? Tiger-6A is practically not inferior to Lynx, Iveka's superiority is blown.