The Pentagon complains about the "barbaric" interception of the RC-135U reconnaissance aircraft by the Russian Su-27 in the sky over the Baltic

400
American edition Washington Free Beacon writes about the incident that occurred over the Baltic Sea with the American reconnaissance aircraft RC-135U and the Russian Su-27. The publication refers to representatives of the Pentagon, who claim that the Russian fighter pilot acted "unprofessionally", approaching the American plane at an "unsafe distance", and performing an "unsafe maneuver."

The Pentagon complains about the "barbaric" interception of the RC-135U reconnaissance aircraft by the Russian Su-27 in the sky over the Baltic


Pentagon spokesman Mark Wright:

On the morning of April 7, the American aircraft RC-135U, making regular flights in international airspace, was intercepted by the Russian Su-27 at an unsafe distance and in an unprofessional manner, making an unsafe maneuver. The United States will raise this issue for consideration through diplomatic channels.


In the US media, the interception was called "barbaric" ...

Washington Free Beacon writes that the plane of the Russian Air Force approached the American reconnaissance aircraft at a distance of 6 meters, "putting at risk the lives of the American crew." At the same time, the publication, again referring to the Pentagon, reports that the RC-135U was performing a "duty flight to observe the movements of Russian military aircraft." So if the flight was "on duty", and yes even on the observation of Russian aircraft, then why then complain? - on the contrary, thank you, you need to say that “Drying” flew so close, allowing the American pilots to twitch to see themselves from all sides ...
400 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +153
    April 11 2015 07: 57
    The American crew complained that the Pampers were not taken. The Russians do not allow American crews to fly without "diapers," the US will raise this issue for consideration through diplomatic channels.
    1. +71
      April 11 2015 08: 01
      If cowards are what fly anywhere laughing
      1. +125
        April 11 2015 08: 29
        Quote: fiction
        If cowards are what fly anywhere laughing

        just unlike Iraq or Libya, they can bring down the Baltic Sea without looking that the American and that glavnyuk angry
        1. +83
          April 11 2015 08: 33
          For wisdom, it has long been necessary. Then you can always apologize.
          And you can not apologize.
          1. +41
            April 11 2015 08: 43
            thank you need to say that "Drying" flew so close, allowing the American jerking pilots to examine themselves from all sides ...

            Yes, our pilot just wanted to shoot a smoke, otherwise he forgot his people on the ground, and that's all. smile
            1. +6
              April 11 2015 10: 30
              compare our whitefish with bourgeois
              1. +9
                April 11 2015 22: 03
                It’s time for the Americans to immediately turn on the psychologists in the crew of the aircraft, so on the spot they will begin to calm the poor frightened pilots ...
                1. +2
                  April 12 2015 11: 36
                  Instead of psychologists in the cockpit of bourgeois planes, a "boob" is provided for especially impressionable ....)))))) sucked and set off ..)))
                  1. +5
                    April 12 2015 16: 53
                    And one! in turn))))))))
                  2. horizont05
                    0
                    April 14 2015 05: 50
                    Better "pussy".
                2. +4
                  April 12 2015 13: 35
                  And who will reassure the poor, deadly frightened psychologists?
                  Probably our valiant pilots !!! After all, it was for this that our plane flew up to theirs by 6 meters, although it could certainly be closer !!!
                  1. +1
                    April 13 2015 13: 56
                    - And what's the point, everything jumps out of your head, as you will see this fool
                    1. Seawolf
                      0
                      April 13 2015 14: 35
                      Good, great movie.
                      It is based on real events.
              2. +1
                April 11 2015 22: 03
                It’s time for the Americans to immediately turn on the psychologists in the crew of the aircraft, so on the spot they will begin to calm the poor frightened pilots ...
                1. +5
                  April 12 2015 10: 55
                  Yes, apparently the Americans do not know that our pilots have a battering ram - it’s in the blood. Even Nesterov rammed a German airplane in World War I in 1, and during the Second World War there were many of his followers. Know the Americans, our pilots can fight without weapons. tongue soldier
                  1. +3
                    April 12 2015 11: 37
                    if it’s impatient, ours can refuel directly from the American side in flight ... note ..)))
                    1. horizont05
                      0
                      April 14 2015 05: 52
                      Every Russian man knows how to drain gasoline through a hose laughing
            2. +13
              April 11 2015 10: 34
              intercepted by the Russian Su-27 at an unsafe distance and in an unprofessional manner


              Wrong Washington Free Beacon writes ... the prefix "not" was put before the word "professional." request
              1. The comment was deleted.
              2. +37
                April 11 2015 11: 50
                It is urgent to punish the drying pilot by presenting with a medal! wink
                1. +37
                  April 11 2015 14: 16
                  ..approached. at a distance of 6 meters


                  5-6 meters - distance in a combat rhombus, Drying just professionally kneads before group aerobatics at MAX-2015 laughing
                  1. +7
                    April 11 2015 14: 23
                    next time let the air defense flex and the dog will howl that the Russian missiles flew 6 meters from the plane.
                    she’s not yet aware of the bombing.
                    1. +1
                      April 12 2015 16: 55
                      Here's another, translate ammunition ......
                  2. 0
                    April 13 2015 09: 54
                    For them, this is an incomprehensible format .... And what will happen in a real battle ... And if there is a ram? ...
                2. +41
                  April 11 2015 15: 54
                  According to Konashenkov, on 7 on April 13: 18 Moscow time, an unknown aerial target was found by air defense duty personnel over the Baltic Sea, which was heading towards the Russian state border.

                  As a result, a Su-27 fighter was lifted, which flew up to an unknown aircraft, flew over it several times, identified as the US Air Force RC-135U reconnaissance aircraft and its aircraft number, which was reported to the command.

                  After the flight of the American scout by a Russian fighter, the US Air Force aircraft changed course and left the Russian border

                  He also noted that the reconnaissance aircraft was moving with the transponder turned off. At the same time, according to Konashenkov, there were no extraordinary situations during the flight.
                  The head of the Federation Council committee on international affairs, Konstantin Kosachev, called on the United States to stop pumping up the atmosphere around flights of Russian military aircraft in the Baltic region.

                  "In connection with the incident over the Baltic, we must remember one detail: Russia is a Baltic country, but the United States is not," the senator added.
                  1. +1
                    April 11 2015 18: 11
                    Quote: Siberia
                    As a result, the Su-27 fighter was raised

                    Aviators, please enlighten. But aren’t they intercepting in pairs?
                    1. +19
                      April 11 2015 22: 05
                      But it will not be bold - a couple of Su-27s for a dozen cost ... p ... dosov? Enough and one for annual enuresis.
                    2. +2
                      April 12 2015 11: 39
                      whom was there a couple to intercept?
                      Usually a couple ...
                      But if necessary, then it is possible for half the time ..))
                    3. +2
                      April 12 2015 18: 09
                      THERE AND ONE EYE
                  2. +28
                    April 11 2015 18: 25
                    Exactly. Yes it is they approached "at a dangerous distance" well and got snot. This is not Africa with Kalash and RPGs, although this is also present;) Poor Americans, near the Russian border, were bent by the Russian Air Force ..... Lawlessness - what is going on in the world? ))))
                  3. +8
                    April 11 2015 20: 14
                    and how to intercept our tanker in the same place, so they are masters and we are aggressors
                    1. +1
                      April 11 2015 20: 50
                      so it’s gasoline (I know but it’s easier) and it is not covered by a fighter
                    2. +2
                      April 12 2015 11: 40
                      Maybe I don’t know what? When was our refueling station intercepted? It’s good if they managed to catch up .... there it didn’t even reach ... the flyer didn’t consider it necessary to change the course ..)) so let them learn how to intercept.
                  4. +5
                    April 11 2015 21: 21
                    Quote: Siberia
                    As a result, the Su-27 fighter was raised

                    ... flew up to the enemy in invert, knocked on the lantern with the binding of his lantern ...
                    Apparently such an action is considered professional, but nothing, ours simply did not know, next time they will definitely do everything "professionally" laughing
                    1. +1
                      April 12 2015 11: 42
                      it is necessary for Americans to issue a sledgehammer on a long handle in flight .. let the cap open and try to drive away our interceptors ..))) we can at least be calmer ..)))
                  5. 0
                    April 13 2015 07: 47
                    Siberia, well done!
                    I did not know about this from the media.
                    Thanks for the "info".
                  6. 0
                    April 13 2015 14: 07
                    They will answer for the Kursk ...
                    1. Seawolf
                      0
                      April 13 2015 14: 36
                      Type for Sevastopol already answered? wassat
                3. +6
                  April 11 2015 21: 16
                  I propose to punish the pilot with a three-ruble note in the center of Moscow, so that it would be inconvenient for others, to give 30 hectares of land, to break my head, what to do with it, to give an expensive car, to go bankrupt and get a ticket to the Maldives, that would understand in a month, how bad he is without a homeland ...
                  1. +3
                    April 12 2015 11: 43
                    Guys .. believe me ... OUR pilots are not capable of this for their homeland. So you can already liberate the center of Moscow .... Yes, and rent the Maldives ... completely and indefinitely.
              3. The comment was deleted.
              4. gjv
                +4
                April 11 2015 16: 39
                Quote: Kibalchish
                Wrong Washington Free Beacon writes ...

                Wrong Washington Free Beacon is spelled.
                Must Washington free Beawith write. laughing
                1. +4
                  April 11 2015 18: 30
                  Quote: gjv
                  It’s necessary to write Washington Free Becon. (Fixed by me)

                  This is more relevant to the Ukrainian Embassy laughing . With respect.
              5. +3
                April 11 2015 18: 26
                it was necessary to intercept professionally from a distance of launching missiles, with subsequent apologies lol
              6. +1
                April 12 2015 18: 04
                And PROFESSIONALLY, IT IS NOT AS TAKEOFF. OUR TRAINED SO PLUS CONFIDENCE IN YOUR OWN
              7. 0
                April 13 2015 11: 13
                Occupational - it was necessary to roll away kilometers after 100 missiles? wink So wait.
            3. avg
              +23
              April 11 2015 12: 37
              But what nasty these Russians are - they are getting closer and closer to the NATO border, then they are flying unprofessionally to the American intelligence officers near Kaliningrad. It's just some kind of shock and horror! belay
            4. North Wind
              +6
              April 11 2015 14: 23
              well, if you’re scared, then it’s business - they hid under water - you’ll find FIG
            5. +4
              April 12 2015 07: 12
              Yes, it’s the young who have seized themselves, show off. the Americans probably also calmly reported (although hell knows the current ones), but at the top PR managers in uniform started to blow up the blizzard. In Soviet times, everything was much calmer, for life questions were asked, who has how many children, congratulated each other on his birthday. Pilots on both sides are the same people and are not divided into devils and angels.
            6. +1
              April 12 2015 11: 35
              Our Fighters do not smoke or drink in flight .... because even Mityaev himself said: "an aviator does not fly while drunk"))))))) I'm wondering .. in case of war, we will have time to answer the notes of protest with the amerikosov sides or they will flood us with papers. for we fly and do not go out for a walk. In case of war, our right angle can reach 100 degrees, if anything ..))
            7. +1
              April 12 2015 21: 00
              Quote: СРЦ П-15
              Yes, our pilot just wanted to shoot a smoke
              But the enemies have sniffed out! Indeed, our plane had to land on a reconnaissance plane. Refuel your plane for free and take some shpien devices, purely for a souvenir. BUT, at a height of 6 meters, the on-board computer canceled the planned landing, as the smell (stench) emanating from the RC-135U was classified by it as a "dung heap". Currently, Air Force programmers are working on transferring the file "manure heap" from the folder "danger" to the folder of classification "friend or foe".
            8. The comment was deleted.
          2. zzz
            zzz
            +64
            April 11 2015 08: 45
            Quote: Cheshire
            For wisdom, it has long been necessary. Then you can always apologize.
            And you can not apologize.

            Surely no need to apologize! Afraid - don’t do it, but done - don’t be afraid. You need to stop making excuses. Moreover, for our pilots such a distance is not considered dangerous, so to speak!
            1. +2
              April 11 2015 08: 52
              The main idea - for the order it is high time to land a couple of birds. I hope you understand that apology is a banter. You can always attribute everything to the emotional stress of the pilot, shaking hands, etc. Well, the type so accidentally happened (a couple of missiles and a line from the gun for control). bully
              1. +20
                April 11 2015 10: 48
                Quote: Cheshire
                Well, the type so accidentally happened (a couple of missiles and a line from the gun for control).


                shot down in the international space of a plane of a foreign state ???? my friend, yes you are raving. there’s a lot of hemorrhoids with the downed Ukraine boeing, and if you shoot someone down now, and even in the INTERNATIONAL space, you won’t get isolation ...
                1. +2
                  April 11 2015 10: 54
                  "here you can't get off with isolation ..." I wonder your opinion, but what?
                  1. 0
                    April 11 2015 14: 54
                    Quote: provincial
                    "here you can't get off with isolation ..." I wonder your opinion, but what?

                    Destruction by a combat aircraft in a neutral airspace of a military aircraft of another state is war. And there can be no other reaction. Here you can’t get off with diplomatic notes. Is the reconnaissance price too high ?!
                    1. +7
                      April 11 2015 16: 05
                      Quote: sanych
                      Destruction by a combat aircraft in a neutral airspace of a military aircraft of another state is war. And there can be no other reaction. Here you can’t get off with diplomatic notes. Is the reconnaissance price too high ?!

                      If this is necessary, then yes, and it will be a scandal, apologies, compensation, notes of protest, recall of ambassadors for consultations, etc. ... It’s another matter that no one will bring down any weapons over neutral terra, but as in in this case, fly up to the closest possible distance or demonstrate weapons that are on alert, so that the adversary understands the seriousness of the situation and begins to lay bricks, that's what it takes.
                    2. +1
                      April 12 2015 11: 58
                      so war? - and Kursk?
                      1. 0
                        April 12 2015 22: 22
                        That's it .. they’ve removed it from the language, practically ..
                    3. +6
                      April 12 2015 16: 32
                      Quote: sanych
                      Destruction by a combat aircraft in a neutral airspace of a military aircraft of another state is war. And there can be no other reaction. Here you can’t get off with diplomatic notes. Is the reconnaissance price too high ?!

                      Our plane made a fly-over of the reconnaissance and with its maneuver warned of his shooting down while crossing the air borders (the border was not far). I'd like to add that American reconnaissance aircraft are such a "piece" brand. Very expensive, special engines, special fuel, special design, special preparation for the flight, almost assembly before takeoff.
                      If such an aircraft is well shaken by the air flow from the Drying engines, then the aircraft will always be forced to go to the nearest airfield capable of receiving it. Because Surely the glider will be broken by Drying and when flying at super speeds, the scout will simply fall apart. This is one of the ways (non-combat) to interrupt reconnaissance flight.
                      And just to bring down a scout - Drying is unnecessary. One air defense missile is enough. But if you haven’t entered the borders of Russia, then you cannot shoot down. And so, Drying caused damage to many months of repair and control of the scout's parameters.
                      Keep it up so that aggressors do not meddle!
                      1. +1
                        April 12 2015 18: 34
                        Perhaps I'm wrong, but isn't the aforementioned reconnaissance aircraft a modification of the banal Boeing? Not a U-2 or a blackbird, never.
                      2. 0
                        April 13 2015 11: 17
                        Sure. Judging by the title - the brother of the one allegedly "shot down" in 1983 in D.Vostok. RC-135. Yes, the usual Boeing.
                    4. 0
                      April 12 2015 17: 02
                      What if his bolt was unscrewed? And they say, the Russians shot down ...... tongue
                2. +14
                  April 11 2015 11: 20
                  Quote: Kostoprav
                  Quote: Cheshire
                  Well, the type so accidentally happened (a couple of missiles and a line from the gun for control).

                  shot down in the international space of a plane of a foreign state ???? my friend, yes you are raving. there’s a lot of hemorrhoids with the downed Ukraine boeing, and if you shoot someone down now, and even in the INTERNATIONAL space, you won’t get isolation ...

                  No, I'm fully conscious. Hemorrhoids with a downed Malaysian Boeing are now not among Russia, but among the democrats led by the United States. Is isolation of Russia really frightening you? Already imagined how they will punish us, no longer at ease. Advice - when they beat you, do not brush it off - it will get less.
                  In war as in war.
                3. +10
                  April 11 2015 12: 34
                  no need to shit, pindos love strength, so you need to keep the idiots in good shape, they are not afraid to create a "northern fist", and we will train them
                4. 0
                  April 11 2015 13: 06
                  And then what will happen?
                5. The comment was deleted.
                6. The comment was deleted.
                7. +1
                  April 12 2015 00: 01
                  Why shoot down missiles? Turn on the electronic warfare - and no trace .. The scout flew, but it broke .. The devices refused - so he fell, some kind of pity ...
              2. 0
                April 11 2015 18: 43
                Oh, I agree. Shoot down, catch the pilot, wash, feed and solemnly, showcase to the states, send the dough to Hollywood, make a film for an Oscar and praise our Russia to the whole world!
            2. +15
              April 11 2015 09: 25
              Tell these animals what is dangerous (for aerobatic teams, wassat belay but this is not necessary to say) a distance of less than 1 meter is considered.
            3. +7
              April 11 2015 10: 17
              Quote: zzz
              Quote: Cheshire
              For wisdom, it has long been necessary. Then you can always apologize.
              And you can not apologize.

              Surely no need to apologize! Afraid - don’t do it, but done - don’t be afraid. You need to stop making excuses. Moreover, for our pilots such a distance is not considered dangerous, so to speak!

              I agree, there’s no need to apologize .... I’m not saying: before WHO ??? if we have such a piloting style, we need to get used to it already, because in aviation there has been more than a decade of purely RUSSIAN PROFESSIONALISM of piloting .... we have never equaled the worst in military affairs .... but to equal ourselves - they have a small intestine ( does not hold) ....
            4. +22
              April 11 2015 10: 59
              zzz
              Surely no need to apologize!

              They just need to apologize, we are cultural people. Knock down and apologize, knock down and apologize, knock down and apologize, knock down again and apologize again .... Then for the apologies, you look, they will not fly.
              1. +4
                April 11 2015 14: 02
                Quote: EwgenyZ
                Knock down and apologize, knock down and apologize, knock down and apologize, knock down again and apologize again .... Then for the apologies, you look, they will not fly.

                Nonsense! But it doesn’t occur to us that then they will start to knock ours and drown. Can immediately arrange a nuclear duel, will there be fewer fools on Earth?
                1. +8
                  April 11 2015 19: 51
                  Bayonet
                  Nonsense!
                  And to shoot down a potential enemy’s plane in such a difficult and explosive time without apology is not nonsense?))) Do not you understand the joke? I don’t think that woodpeckers are sitting here on the site, the people are quite adequate. Someone joked, someone supported, and you immediately explain the political situation. Relax ...
              2. 0
                April 11 2015 21: 15
                simply put the lyuley once to
          3. WKS
            +7
            April 11 2015 08: 45
            thank you need to say that "Drying" flew so close, allowing the American jerking pilots to examine themselves from all sides ...
            If flew once, then showed only one side. At the next meeting, it is necessary to show the remaining not inspected parts.
          4. +42
            April 11 2015 08: 53
            Quote: Cheshire
            For wisdom, it has long been necessary. Then you can always apologize.
            And you can not apologize.

            Well, I think it’s not worth spending a rocket ... but it’s quite possible to send a jet into a corkscrew, and there it’s not our headache to plop down. It’s sure that they will fly only at night and only in California. hi
            1. +17
              April 11 2015 10: 02
              So in Soviet times, they did so, sharply emerging from under the reconnaissance aircraft
              1. +8
                April 11 2015 12: 40
                in Soviet times, naval aviation in Bykhov TU-22M3 kept the reins in check and no one barked, although our asses loved to bite creatures
              2. 0
                April 13 2015 01: 54
                Quote: The Cat
                So in Soviet times, they did so, sharply emerging from under the reconnaissance aircraft

                besides, this NATO intelligence officer flew with the TRANSponder turned OFF! That is, without the recognition system turned on. So it was not an identified target, something forgotten at our borders. And how could this be done? Even if I shot down this plane, On the LEGAL side, everything within the framework of international law, as the pilots of the NATO intelligence, flew with the identification system turned off.
                1. 0
                  April 14 2015 00: 09
                  Quote: NEXUS
                  Quote: The Cat
                  So in Soviet times, they did so, sharply emerging from under the reconnaissance aircraft

                  besides, this NATO intelligence officer flew with the TRANSponder turned OFF! That is, without the recognition system turned on. So it was not an identified target, something forgotten at our borders. And how could this be done? Even if I shot down this plane, On the LEGAL side, everything within the framework of international law, as the pilots of the NATO intelligence, flew with the identification system turned off.


                  Until the plane has crossed the border, you cannot shoot it down. And even when crossed they should try to plant him first. Yet not a war yet.
                  1. 0
                    April 14 2015 00: 39
                    Quote: The Cat
                    . Yet not a war yet.

                    forgive me, but do you think that the war ended in 45? Hmm ... I will probably greatly surprise you if I say that the war did not end in 45, but only changed its appearance. Look who went to the CIA, the Pentagon is working. SS, Abwehr ... and to this day, in one form or another, this war was waged, sometimes manifesting itself in a "hot" form, such as in Vietnam, Korea or in Yugoslavia ... and now they are waging a cyber war against us, information and economic war, and in the Donbass and with shelling and bombing a war ... so do not think that the United States is so kind and fluffy, placing bases on the borders of Russia and sending reconnaissance planes to our borders. THE WAR DIDN'T STOP.
                    1. 0
                      April 14 2015 22: 53
                      It doesn't matter what I think. No matter what you think. While there is no officially declared war, an attempt to bring down a plane of a foreign state, especially in international airspace is equivalent to declaring war. And let's look realistically, without the use of nuclear weapons, it’s hardly possible to win a war now. Only winners will not be anyway.
            2. The comment was deleted.
              1. +3
                April 11 2015 13: 43
                The defeat of an aircraft belonging to another state located in international airspace threatens a military conflict. Any aircraft can be in international airspace, it is his right not to do it. I think hoo-patriots at heart do not want war. Of course you need to train, but do not violate the rules of air traffic. Moreover, there is no need to approach to destroy the target by 6 meters.
              2. +2
                April 11 2015 14: 49
                their gut is thin such a mentality is not the same!
                1. The comment was deleted.
                2. +2
                  April 11 2015 19: 26
                  All this is great - sitting on the couch writing hurray-patriotic slogans, where the keywords are: "s", "geyropa", "mattress", "diapers", "gut is thin", etc. You sit, type sentences with keywords and - get a rating (pluses). A few commentators express their thoughts without fear of minuses. Take a close look and see.
                  In Soviet times, the actions of such a pilot could be considered a violation of the rules of aircraft control (if not a provocation of war).
                  The military power of the state is manifested in patrolling the Air Force in strategically important areas of the world, the presence (flag display), the navy in the oceans. Naturally without violating generally accepted international laws and regulations.
                  1. +6
                    April 11 2015 19: 37
                    Quote: bolat19640303
                    All this is great - sitting on the couch writing hurray-patriotic slogans, where the keywords are: "s", "geyropa", "mattress", "diapers", "gut is thin", etc. You sit, type sentences with keywords and - get a rating (pluses).

                    In some ways, you’re right about slogans, sofas, etc. ... but tell me, what is the current relationship between Russia and NATO, and with the United States in particular? Do you think we have friendship forever or they introduce sanctions, bases build from the big love for us?
                    Quote: bolat19640303
                    In Soviet times, the actions of such a pilot could be considered a violation of the rules of aircraft control (if not a provocation of war).

                    in Soviet times, what do you think would the USSR react to the war in Ukraine, bases in Romania, Bulgaria and Poland, Donald Cook’s entry to the Crimea?
                    Quote: bolat19640303
                    The military power of the state is manifested in patrolling the Air Force in strategically important areas of the world, the presence (flag display), the navy in the oceans. Naturally without violating generally accepted international laws and regulations.

                    you take a look at the history of relations and incidents, both at sea and in the air, take a look between the Air Force and the Navy of the USSR and the USA. hi
                    1. 0
                      April 11 2015 20: 34
                      [/ Quote]
                      In some ways, you’re right about slogans, sofas, etc. ... but tell me, what is the current relationship between Russia and NATO, and with the United States in particular? Do you think we have friendship forever or they introduce sanctions, bases build from the big love for us?
                      Yes, they have a lot of love for us and we haven’t and don’t have (and most likely never will). We have different views on the world order.
                      [/ Quote]
                      in Soviet times, what do you think would the USSR react to the war in Ukraine, bases in Romania, Bulgaria and Poland, Donald Cook’s entry to the Crimea?
                      In Soviet times, the war in Ukraine would be a war with the USSR. Naturally, NATO bases would not exist in the Warsaw Pact countries. Provocations of NATO ships in the Black Sea were, it is a fact.
                      [/ Quote]
                      you take a look at the history of relations and incidents, both at sea and in the air, take a look between the Air Force and the Navy of the USSR and the USA. hi[/ Quote]
                      You were right such facts and quite a lot. Sometimes we could cross the line and start a nuclear war. Tell me honestly, what is the practical goal of approaching the plane (albeit a likely enemy) by 6 meters (as they say)? Demonstration of what - remove, skill, fearlessness or ...
                      1. +4
                        April 11 2015 20: 44
                        Quote: bolat19640303
                        Tell me honestly, what is the practical goal of approaching an airplane (albeit a likely adversary) at 6 meters (as they say)? Demonstration of what - remove, skill, fearlessness or ...

                        this is psychological pressure and a demonstration of the fact that the actions of a likely enemy are closely watched. Do you think the Americans and NATO pilots in general are not doing the same with our planes?
                        Look at the stench that the Americans lit up about our planes that are refueling in Vietnam.
                        And the Baltic is a territory of Russia's personal interests. And therefore, flying in those parts, the Americans should understand this well and clearly.
                        All these cases and messages to a potential adversary can be called one phrase, DO NOT GET ANYWHERE OTHERWISE IT IS POSSIBLE AND RECEIVED IN THE NEXT.
                      2. +2
                        April 11 2015 22: 48
                        SU-27 in a rhombus fly with an approximation of 4 (four) !! meter. This is not only skill. It is also the technical characteristics of the aircraft that allow approaching the enemy’s aircraft at a minimum distance.
                        P.S. To shovel out of my pants with a shovel fellow such.
                      3. +4
                        April 12 2015 11: 36
                        bolat19640303
                        You were right such facts and quite a lot. Sometimes we could cross the line and start a nuclear war. Tell me honestly, what is the practical goal of approaching the plane (albeit a likely enemy) by 6 meters (as they say)? Demonstration of what - remove, skill, fearlessness or ...


                        And what practical purpose did the bulk of the Soviet ship have on American Yorktown (1988)? That's right - throw him out of the Black Sea. For nefig impudent - not at home.

                        The pilot showed nothing. He performed a combat mission.

                        the reconnaissance aircraft flew with the transponder turned off, "which our NATO colleagues have been so fond of declaring recently." As a result of the flight, according to Konashenkov, there were no emergency situations, the plane of the US Air Force changed course and left the Russian border.
                        http://lenta.ru/news/2015/04/11/su27/


                        The officer completed his task. So, I see no reason to blame him for something.
                      4. The comment was deleted.
                  2. Seawolf
                    0
                    April 12 2015 10: 34
                    And you take an interest in interest. How many Americans lost planes in such situations. More than 350 and rightly so, there was nothing to suvat us.
                3. 0
                  April 11 2015 21: 19
                  Quote: croche
                  their gut is thin such a mentality is not the same!

                  yes noooo, smooogut, villains they have many times more
              3. +2
                April 11 2015 19: 05
                Quote: Antonov
                Here you are, let’s say so - a narrow-minded person. You write for the most part anything ... You get points, and I think this is your only goal here. They give you the same advantages as you ... And it doesn’t even come to your mind (though, what am I?):

                Dear, you are for me? I don’t graze the cows with you, so that we switch to "YOU." and everyone expresses their point of view on the topic. And how is your statement about points? Or do you measure everyone by yourself?
                With regards to


                Quote: Antonov
                But what if they do the same with our airplanes as you advise ...

                since the times of relations between the USSR and the USA, this practice has been on both our and Amer’s side. Not only in the sky, but also at sea. For example, the ram of the US cruiser was a Soviet watchman.
                1. Antonov
                  -3
                  April 12 2015 10: 36
                  Quote: NEXUS

                  Dear, are you this to me?

                  No, damn it, Ivan Fedorovich Kruzenshtern - a man and a ship. Of course you.
                  Quote: NEXUS
                  I don’t graze cows with you, so that we switch to "YOU"

                  It's true. When choosing who will graze the cows, I refused.

                  Quote: NEXUS
                  With regards to your "mental vyser" in the form of this post, so I may tell you a big secret, saying that there is a forum, discussion, and each expresses his point of view on the topic.

                  Well, I expressed my point about your mental vyser. What is the problem?
                  Quote: NEXUS
                  And what side is your statement about points? Or do you measure all by yourself?

                  I would measure by myself - I would write the same near, without any attempt at least a little understanding of the situation urapatriotic blizzard.

                  Quote: NEXUS

                  With regards to
                  Quote: Antonov
                  But what if they do the same with our airplanes as you advise ...

                  since the times of relations between the USSR and the USA, this practice has been on both our and Amer’s side. Not only in the sky, but also at sea. For example, the ram of the US cruiser was a Soviet watchman.

                  I kept waiting for you to give just this example. Tell you the difference in the case of the plane or will you come up with it yourself?
                  since the times of relations between the USSR and the USA, this practice has been with both ours and amerovskaya parties. And not only in the sky, but also at sea.

                  Such a knowledgeable person, I think, won't get into your pocket for examples?
                  P.S. And please learn how to write the word "moreover" correctly, otherwise it hurts your eyes.
                  1. 0
                    April 12 2015 12: 16
                    Quote: Antonov
                    No, damn it, Ivan Fedorovich Kruzenshtern - a man and a ship. Of course you.

                    so contact him. Liberasts like you are not interesting to me at all.
                    Quote: Antonov
                    Well, I expressed my point of view about your mental vyser. What is the problem?

                    but in the fact that you probably know how to be rude only by sitting at the clave. In real life, you would sit and in a rag were silent with your mouse. The culture is clearly not disfigured, but learn to sit spelling.
                    Quote: Antonov
                    I kept waiting for you to give just this example.

                    I repeat, with such terry liberalism as YOU, I did not graze cows and I will not graze.
                    Quote: Antonov
                    P.S. And please learn how to write the word "moreover" correctly, otherwise it hurts your eyes.

                    You will teach your children tact and culture, a hamlo liberal. Regarding the cheers of patriotism, personally to you -WIPE YOUR EYES, DAMAGE. You where you can see the cheers of the patriot. Paranoia, you are respected. Go to a psychiatrist, check yourself.
              4. 0
                April 12 2015 21: 51
                And we must shoot down and apologize, we are polite !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! But about our plane and shoot down, hmm, it will even be interesting, but how will they try to do it? I would say let them try, and instruct our pilots accordingly. However, I am not the commander of the Russian Air Force, so I’ll just watch what happens, because our opponents, I think, have such thoughts too. And in the international airspace it is slightly uncultured. I think first you need to drive him to us, and only then .......
            3. 0
              April 12 2015 17: 08
              .... AND ONLY ON THE SIMULATOR ....
          5. +6
            April 11 2015 09: 44
            Quote: Cheshire
            For wisdom, it has long been necessary. Then you can always apologize.

            When their NATO singers "intercept" Russian planes, they do everything according to NATO rules, at a safe distance. Otherwise, they will not receive insurance on occasion. And I never heard them apologize.
            1. -3
              April 11 2015 11: 36
              Quote: Hedgehog
              When their NATO singers "intercept" Russian planes, they do everything according to NATO rules, at a safe distance. Otherwise, they will not receive insurance on occasion. And I never heard them apologize.

              I meant not to intercept, but to bring down.)))
          6. +8
            April 11 2015 10: 52
            Quote: Cheshire
            For wisdom, it has long been necessary. Then you can always apologize.
            And you can not apologize.

            How is it not to apologize? Yet they serve in the Russian army polite people! wink
            1. 0
              April 11 2015 11: 01
              Quote: Nick
              How is it not to apologize? Yet polite people serve in the Russian army!

              and who will say about the Russian pilots? request ... it's all either a UFO or the Baltic, the second Bermuda Triangle has appeared, in which only NATO planes and ships will disappear selectively.hi
          7. 0
            April 11 2015 11: 43
            Precisely, you need to "accidentally" hook the rocket. And declare that the mattress deliberately ran into her.
          8. 0
            April 11 2015 11: 45
            It was necessary to cut down his electronics, like on the Black Sea ...
            Let them fly ... wassat
            1. 0
              April 11 2015 20: 14
              The most realistic offer of all previously published. We are not responsible for other people's electronics.
          9. +1
            April 11 2015 12: 29
            what else apologize to whom, to pigs throw beads
          10. +3
            April 11 2015 12: 42
            and as they did with the Tu-95 bears, there were touches. Your method is not to your taste?
          11. +3
            April 11 2015 13: 54
            Quote: Cheshire
            For wisdom, it has long been necessary. Then you can always apologize.

            In neutral waters, like pirates? An apology will then not be accepted, then response actions will be taken. Surprisingly a lot of positive feedback on such a proposal, this is suggestive ...
          12. +18
            April 11 2015 13: 59
            Quote: Cheshire
            Then you can always apologize.
          13. +2
            April 11 2015 14: 49
            Konstantin Kosachev picked up a very good word: "... Stop hysteria!"
          14. +4
            April 11 2015 15: 50
            Russia is threatening not only with nuclear weapons, but also with conventional ones. This conclusion came from the influential American magazine The National Interest.

            According to journalist specializing in military affairs, Dave Majumdar, some types of Russian weapons cause serious concern to the Pentagon. In his opinion, their characteristics are in many ways superior to those of their American counterparts. For example, 5 provides the top types of weapons and equipment that the US military should be especially wary of.
            The leader of the rating is the Su-35 multirole fighter. The aircraft is extremely fast, can rise to great heights and has a huge combat load. One of its main advantages is the combination of advanced capabilities to intercept high-altitude targets with lightning speed and a unique engine with increased traction. And really, there is something to be afraid of. Su-35 is capable of speeds up to 2,4 thousands of km / h and can fly non-stop flights at a distance of up to 3,6 thousands of km. It has powerful bomb, missile and cannon weapons. At the same time, the Su-35 is as versatile as possible - it feels equally confident both as a fighter, and as a long-range interceptor, and as a bomber-bomber.
            1. +4
              April 11 2015 15: 51
              The non-nuclear submarine Amur is ranked second in the Pentagon's fears rating. Although the autonomy of diesel-electric submarines is much less than that of nuclear submarines, non-nuclear submarines move very quietly and pose a huge danger to surface ships. The Amur hull is also designed to minimize noise, the units are mounted on shock absorbers that damp vibration, and four torpedo tubes and ten anti-ship missile launchers are capable of scaring any army in the world.
              The third place was given to the T-90 tank, which combines modern fire control systems, surveillance, communication and navigation equipment and an effective defense system. Moreover, their cost is much lower than the western Leopard 2 or M1M2 Abrams.

              Recall that the T-90 is equipped with a complex of guided tank missile weapons "Reflex-M", which according to the classification of the USA and NATO is aptly called Sniper. This fire control system is based on the coordination of a projectile using a laser beam, due to which an amazing accuracy of projectile hits is achieved at a distance of up to 5 thousand meters. Moreover, the indicated distance the rocket flies in just 17 seconds.
              1. +6
                April 11 2015 15: 52
                The fourth position, according to the American magazine, is the P-800 Onyx universal anti-ship missile, on the basis of which the Russian Federation and India have jointly created the BrahMos missile system. It was originally created only to defeat surface targets, but it is also capable of working on ground targets. Moreover, in the second case, the affected area, which is 300 kilometers above the water, increases several times. These characteristics are many times higher than those of the American Harpoon missile, the publication says.

                The top five are closed by anti-ship steam-gas torpedoes "53-65". Created in Soviet times, they are equipped with an active acoustic homing system with vertical tracking of the wake. There is no defense against these torpedoes in the United States, making them extremely dangerous to the American fleet.

                At the end of the article, it is noted that most of the above types of weapons are successfully exported by Russia, and the number of countries wishing to acquire them is constantly increasing. So, India intends to buy two Amur submarines and is already using the BrahMos complex, China plans to purchase a batch of Su-35 and has already purchased 53-65 torpedoes. And the T-90 tanks are in service with India, Algeria, Uganda, Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan and many other countries.

                Igor Korotchenko, head of the Center for Analysis of World Arms Trade, in a commentary for RG, noted that soon the American military will become even more afraid, since the next generations of many of these weapons are almost ready. "The T-90 is being replaced by the Armata, the Su-35 is being replaced by the 5th generation T-50 fighter, and the Amur is being replaced by more modern non-nuclear submarines of the Lada class," he said. In general, according to the expert, the list of Russian weapons that the Pentagon should be wary of is much more extensive than the listed 5 items.
                1. Alf
                  +4
                  April 11 2015 18: 25
                  Quote: Siberia
                  There is no protection against these torpedoes in the USA,

                  Why doesn’t exist? There is such protection. You just have to find a torpedo 53-65 abruptly fall into a drift and the seeker’s torpedoes are just nothing to cling to. True, then the flying P-800s will be very happy ...
                  1. +1
                    April 13 2015 11: 53
                    Well, imagine how long it would take to go to the drift of the 12 driveway five-story building?
                2. +1
                  April 12 2015 00: 29
                  Thanks for the info!
                  One misfortune: we sell our wonderful weapons - wherever you are .. We lose our advantage
                  They kill ours from him (Afghanistan, Chechnya, Tskhinval, Donbass)
                  To fight with the wrong hands - that’s what pin dos need to be adopted
              2. Alf
                -1
                April 11 2015 18: 22
                Quote: Siberia
                and four torpedo tubes and ten anti-ship missile launchers can scare any army in the world.

                Tell me, technically illiterate, but how can torpedo tubes and anti-ship missiles scare an ARMY-structure, by definition, LAND? Or is the Amur submarine capable of moving on the ground? Then great glory to our designers, who created the world's first land-based submarine. Now Russia will be able to send a submarine fleet to the shores of Belarus to intercept the 6th American fleet.
                1. +2
                  April 11 2015 18: 29
                  Quote: Alf
                  Tell me, technically illiterate, but how can torpedo tubes and anti-ship missiles scare the ARMY structure, by definition, DRY?

                  the fact is that the most developed, equipped and "advanced" component of the US Army is the Navy. They invest not commensurably more there than in the development of ground forces. Therefore, the Amur submarine was named in the list of threats to the US Armed Forces as dangerous. hi
                  1. Alf
                    0
                    April 11 2015 19: 52
                    Quote: NEXUS
                    "part of the US Army

                    Actually, the US Navy is organizationally part of the US ARMED FORCES, not the army. Although, the American author is forgivable, they are the same as the "class of the ship", that the "type of ship" is absolutely monochromatic.
                    for US forces

                    Here. Not for the US Army, but for the US Armed Forces.
          15. +2
            April 11 2015 16: 42
            Last time, the stump ... the tagon complained about the unprofessionalism of the Russian Air Force, when, after flying over the "Donald" Su-24, sailors wrote 27 letters of dismissal. laughing They say something to us ... wink
          16. 0
            April 11 2015 20: 12
            Quote: Cheshire
            And you can not apologize.

            So oh well !!! Here they are not here, and they are not here! And the point is not iron.
            A good gift for the Air Defense Day! Happy Holidays !!!!
          17. +1
            April 11 2015 20: 28
            They will calmly take pictures of everything, and we will look at them with a "trough" mouth with a finger in our mouth. Let them say thanks for not "banging".
          18. +2
            April 11 2015 23: 21
            For wisdom, it has long been necessary. Then you can always apologize.
            And you can not apologize.
            lol What apologies ???? And to whom ??? Before assholes ??? !!! I think not worth it !!!! And bzdat gentlemen "SPECIAL" after the Black Sea incident with the destroyer "Donald Cook" !!! The general slack and noises in the rear axle began with the "demigods" from an unexpected visit of courtesy - our DRY !!! Then on the trail of fical masses it was possible to trace the further swimming of the Yanok vessel !!!! Keep it up, let them know who is the boss in the forest !!!!!!!!!!! hi
          19. 0
            April 12 2015 18: 19
            It became even a pity the American military. Again deceived. How long to?
        2. +4
          April 11 2015 09: 01
          Why knock it down? He himself could fall with a fright.
          1. +5
            April 11 2015 09: 33
            Apparently Russia should provide an air corridor over the Baltic for American spies. No! to the perpindos, they were shown that their place in the bucket ...
        3. +36
          April 11 2015 09: 13
          Quote: NEXUS
          , in the Baltic Sea they can also bring down, without looking that the American


          They can, but not yet needed, but excellence is necessary to demonstrate. Yes
          1. +4
            April 11 2015 09: 29
            It’s you just not in the eyebrow, but in the eye! laughing drinks
          2. +18
            April 11 2015 09: 44
            On the Su-27 MAN!
            Beautifully trumped by cosmonautics day!
            We need for him at the front 100 grams for health!
          3. +2
            April 11 2015 11: 17
            Slogan to board the interceptor. And duplicate in "English" to read.
        4. +17
          April 11 2015 10: 29
          For mattresses, not "barbaric" behavior is when you launch a missile at a target from a distance of 50-100 km, and aerobatics and maneuverable air combat is definitely "barbaric and not professionalism" =)))
          How right was M. Zadornov.
        5. +3
          April 11 2015 11: 27
          I can’t understand how much you can complain, or they thought they would pat them on the head, let them watch their planes
        6. 0
          April 11 2015 12: 38
          That's for sure, it's not natives to hypnotize! In the expense of 3 minutes and boxes "black" will not find!
        7. 0
          April 12 2015 00: 05
          ++++++++++++++++++++++++
        8. Andrew
          0
          April 12 2015 00: 08
          I completely agree. There is nothing to add.
      2. +27
        April 11 2015 08: 40
        flies without diapers

        - "... the bullet flew by and yeah ..."
        - Nefig sleep at the helm.
        - It is necessary to follow the "road".
        “He did not give way to our priority aircraft.”
        - Everyone flies here ...
        (select the appropriate option)
        1. Job
          +5
          April 11 2015 10: 12
          -I bought a plane, but did not buy a fly
          -All of them buy rights here
          -Look where you are
          1. +2
            April 11 2015 21: 34
            - your documents, please
      3. +17
        April 11 2015 08: 56
        It is necessary to bring up an unconditioned reflex in Amer’s pilots - I saw Sushka, immediately loose stool.)))
        1. Job
          +2
          April 11 2015 10: 13
          No, it’s better to plane to the ground and catapult
        2. 0
          April 13 2015 10: 25
          Airplane to the sidelines. And - your documents, first aid kit, fire extinguisher. And then in response, well, maybe we’ll agree ????
      4. +6
        April 11 2015 09: 40
        Quote: fiction
        If cowards are what fly anywhere

        Well, after all, they also have battle tactics mainly: shot from behind the horizon and rather feet, sorry, wings do away. And with ships the same way. I sensed radar radiation and a 180-degree turn.
        1. Alf
          +2
          April 11 2015 18: 29
          Quote: Hedgehog
          I sensed radar radiation and a 180-degree turn.

          As they said in the film "Crimea" - "The Black Sea has not yet seen such a" eight ", which was laid by" Donald Cook ", when he realized that his electronics were completely crushed, and he himself was accompanied by" Bastion "."
      5. +4
        April 11 2015 10: 30
        This is an unsafe distance for you, and our falcons are used to flying in a close-knit group. What to be indignant, we need to learn from our pilots. This is not "barbaric interception", but flying skills. Just remember to take plenty of diapers on board.
        1. Alf
          0
          April 11 2015 18: 30
          Quote: Alexey Bukin
          This is an unsafe distance for you, and our falcons are used to flying as a close-knit group.

          That's right, the crowd and the Old Man are not afraid to beat, but God himself ordered these.
      6. +1
        April 11 2015 10: 53
        "... by approaching an American aircraft at an 'unsafe distance' and performing an 'unsafe maneuver'."

        Quote: fiction
        If cowards are what fly anywhere


        Yeah ... the Americans got it!
      7. +2
        April 11 2015 11: 31
        It’s strange, as usual, small but proud probalts intercept us! And immediately in all news portals infa. And then the little guy was intimidated by the mattress cover, we have a mess, but the fascintonpost immediately published a sensation!
        1. 0
          April 11 2015 14: 52
          you see the difference between the balts and mattresses
          1. Alf
            0
            April 11 2015 18: 32
            Quote: croche
            you see the difference between the balts and mattresses

            We see. The sprats still didn’t understand who flew up to them, and the overseas warriors took off at the approach of the 27th.
      8. +3
        April 11 2015 13: 59
        It’s just that no one DROPPED THEM into HEAVEN for a long time (since the collapse of the USSR) and there is a PANIC THAT WHO DID THAT dare fly so close to them! The crew must have filed a report on Dismissal from the army, that such an NON-ADEQUATE REACTION by the US command, so they will remain without the Air Force!
      9. +4
        April 11 2015 17: 07
        “I would like to emphasize that the flight of the US Air Force RC-135U to the Russian borders was carried out with the transponder turned off, which our NATO colleagues are so fond of declaring lately. As for assessing the professionalism of our pilots, this is exclusively the competence of the Russian command. And American reconnaissance aircraft can carry out "ordinary" flights only near the US borders, - said the representative of the Russian Defense Ministry. "

        There is nothing to add. Yes and no need.
      10. 0
        April 11 2015 18: 53
        ... they are not cowards, just their panties are wet ....
      11. 0
        April 12 2015 22: 25
        He also explained to the RF Ministry of Defense that their usual flights are off the coast of America.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +36
      April 11 2015 08: 02
      Second "Donald Cook". More reports about full pants. crying Ugh.
      1. +25
        April 11 2015 08: 07
        Pentagon spokesman Mark Wright:
        And where is the Pentagon? That the coast is "beguiled"? Well then, OH!
      2. +9
        April 11 2015 08: 17
        Quote: Cheshire
        Second "Donald Cook". More reports about full pants. crying Ugh.

        Strugatsky. "The Second Invasion of the Martians". "... I hate these memories. Solid full pants." laughing
    4. +15
      April 11 2015 08: 05
      "Mum would still complain."
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. 0
        April 11 2015 10: 21
        Piggy Biting ...........
      3. +4
        April 11 2015 11: 37
        This example clearly shows the work of the propaganda machine of the West. When our aircraft make reconnaissance flights in the international space and NATO fighters fly out to "intercept" them, it is a defense of democratic values. When our fighters take an interest in their scouts near our borders, this is aggression. By the way, American pilots are the most greyhounds of the NATO countries with regard to our aircraft. So: whose cow would bellow about a dangerous approach ...
    5. +18
      April 11 2015 08: 09
      Quote: avvg
      The American crew complained that the Panpers were not taken.


      Yes, they took, they took ... But who knew that in such a LOVELY chair, they are not designed request

      Reason for revising "NATO standards" Yes But there guys are big-headed, they’ll come up with something
    6. +14
      April 11 2015 08: 12
      was intercepted by the Russian Su-27 at an unsafe distance and in an unprofessional manner, performing an unsafe maneuver.

      If so, why is everyone alive and no one crashed ?!
      It was not necessary
      approached the American reconnaissance aircraft at a distance of 6 meters

      and pass OVER the scout at such a height and make a "slide" above him!
      Maybe the "ears and eyes" would blow off the scout!
    7. +17
      April 11 2015 08: 19
      Quote: avvg
      The American crew complained that the Pampers were not taken.
      They don’t fly without diapers, just when they saw the Su 27 at a distance of 100 meters, the diapers were already full, and then, as the Su27 approached, everything flowed with an arithmetic progression. Will be ordered for large volumes.
      1. +3
        April 11 2015 08: 38
        Then it’s easier to design a pilot ejected toilet seat with automatic vacuum removal of contents. At the same time, they will also be sawing R&D.)))
      2. ded10041948
        +1
        April 11 2015 11: 40
        Here are the boobies! They wanted to give them toilet paper, but they are indignant.
    8. +15
      April 11 2015 08: 21
      , how are they going to fight if so many bricks are piled up from the usual interception? smile
    9. Atanda
      +12
      April 11 2015 09: 13
      Americans fly like birds - fly and crap, fly and crap!
    10. +5
      April 11 2015 09: 20
      Mattresses are bold only with the defenseless, and when they show them a fist, then these actions will immediately be called barbaric, in general, the psychology of the punks from the gateway.
    11. +14
      April 11 2015 09: 23
      Distance between Riga and Washington is 7075 kilometers
      Distance St Petersburg Riga in a straight line - 491 km.
      So WHO SHOULD RETURN ?????
    12. +1
      April 11 2015 09: 57
      So what's unprofessional? If they collided, then yes, it was unprofessional.
    13. +5
      April 11 2015 10: 08
      We are glad to return to the normal times of confrontation with the world's evil! And then - "partners, partners ..."
      1. Alf
        +7
        April 11 2015 18: 38
        Quote: Baron Ungern
        And then- "partners, partners ..."
        1. +1
          April 11 2015 20: 46
          laughed photo class conveys mood
    14. +4
      April 11 2015 10: 27
      American planes need to guard the American border and the peace of its inhabitants, and not stagger near the territory of Russia, and not provoke its pilots. And what they got in the teeth is right, and there’s nothing to complain like a woman. They know little Russian, and how far they can go defending their homeland. It is time to start a little to study the Russian character and begin to draw conclusions for the future, otherwise it will be too late.
    15. +1
      April 11 2015 11: 21
      For Americans, unprofessional, what they themselves do not know how? Well, then envy in silence, why tell about your shame to the whole world!
    16. 0
      April 11 2015 11: 42
      He flew to the base and wrote a report on dismissal, he does not want to be on duty anymore. That's it.
    17. +1
      April 11 2015 12: 35
      Quote: avvg
      The American crew complained that the Pampers did not take

      Another American crew will go on demobilization ahead of schedule
      laughing laughing laughing
    18. +2
      April 11 2015 13: 48
      They had pampers, they just turned out to be small and leaked. That's what they complain about.
    19. +1
      April 11 2015 16: 18
      Quote: avvg
      The American crew complained that the Pampers were not taken. The Russians do not allow American crews to fly without "diapers," the US will raise this issue for consideration through diplomatic channels.

      It was necessary to give a turn in front of the nose of an aircraft gun. Then say that the type accidentally clicked wrong ...
    20. +1
      April 11 2015 16: 40
      Yes, the question of diapers is relevant for them, and even very, very much stinks from them ...
      making a regular flight in international airspace, it was intercepted by the Russian Su-27 at an unsafe distance and in an unprofessional manner, performing an unsafe maneuver

      This is precisely what speaks of the high professionalism of the Russian pilot, and ... the syk.plosiveness of the vaunted Pin.dos "ases."
    21. gorge1945
      0
      April 11 2015 18: 00
      All diapers were used by sailors from Donald Cook, after flying around our dryer
      their troughs.
    22. 0
      April 11 2015 18: 27
      Quote: avvg
      The Russians do not allow American crews to fly without "diapers," the US will raise this issue for consideration through diplomatic channels.

      Well, at least the pilot did not threaten his fist, otherwise they, as the Finns, would need the help of a psychologist as a defibrillator. laughing With respect.
    23. +1
      April 11 2015 19: 01
      Most likely, he flapped and slightly on the lantern wingtip, so he with round eyes returned to the base.
    24. +1
      April 11 2015 20: 05
      should be so glad that the pilot of the SU27-ki did not turn on the afterburner in front of the mattress, otherwise he would fry the diapers last)
    25. The comment was deleted.
    26. 0
      April 11 2015 21: 07
      They didn’t professionally discover the African Iroplane, unprofessionally forced the partners to crap, which made it possible for the goat-bearded Uncle Sam to shave professionally.
    27. 0
      April 12 2015 09: 52
      What to take from a cadet, he acted unprofessionally, flew up to an unsafe distance, a professional would simply sit on his back.
    28. ZKB
      0
      April 12 2015 22: 36
      let them say thanks for not knocking down or forcing us to land. Absolutely bewildered.
    29. brdr
      0
      April 13 2015 07: 19
      Will have to resign again
    30. 0
      April 13 2015 10: 23
      Yes, yes, but "brown notes" were sent over the radio, the dispatcher could not understand - is it English or what?))
    31. -2
      April 13 2015 19: 58
      You're a bastard, Colomb, - I’ll tell you honestly.
      As for me,
      then i would
      in person -
      I would have closed America, slightly cleaned,
      and then
      opened again -
      secondarily.
      V.V. Mayakovsky "Christopher Colomb"
    32. 0
      April 13 2015 20: 27
      ........................
  2. +18
    April 11 2015 07: 58
    Here p.indos vzdzdili that.
    1. 0
      April 11 2015 10: 41
      Our pilot acted just professionally enough. If it were unprofessional, it would be both on land or in the water where they flew there.
  3. +28
    April 11 2015 07: 58
    Everything is correct, there is nothing for the Amers to do there, let them be afraid. And our aces brave, keep the falcons.
    1. +22
      April 11 2015 08: 10
      I remember that even in Soviet times, our pilots "trolled" the Amerovsky fleet, easily opening the AUG protection

      And more recently: after the "joke" in the Black Sea, allegedly hellish sailors refused to serve in the striped fleet - HA! what are psychologically stable

      Now the Baltic

      And don’t run around wherever you go, don’t stick your nose where the dog is ... am
      1. +5
        April 11 2015 08: 20
        "... well, what else do you want, little fune!" laughing laughing laughing
  4. +20
    April 11 2015 07: 58
    Would you like to get to know each other better? Are you satisfied? Or need another, hot intimacy? This is our border, and it will be far from yours.
  5. +49
    April 11 2015 07: 59
    the pilot of the Russian fighter acted “unprofessionally”, approaching the American aircraft at an “unsafe distance” and performing the “unsafe maneuver”.


    If it weren’t professional, then your RC-135U has long been at the bottom of the Baltic Sea. Strange people want to conduct reconnaissance, but they are afraid to meet our planes.
    1. +5
      April 11 2015 08: 04
      So, after all, the right to professionalism is, after all, reserved for the whole of Americans. Something like this. request
    2. mad
      +14
      April 11 2015 08: 31
      Quote: rotmistr60
      Strange people want to conduct reconnaissance, but they are afraid to meet our planes.


      A man went hunting for a bear. Found a lair shot a doublet, crawls into it, and there the bear is alive.
      - Cho man wanted to kill me?
      - Yes...
      - Well then, choose either bullies or rape ...
      The man thought and agreed to the second. He returned to the village, took a more powerful gun and more rounds of ammunition, returned to the den and shot him all. He climbs into it, and there the same bear is alive and everything repeats. A very angry man returns home, takes grenades, a machine gun returns to the den, throws grenades, shoots from a machine gun. He climbs up again, and there a bear sits in the smoke and asks in surprise:
      - Man, I can’t understand, are you a hunter or a homosexual?
    3. lord
      +1
      April 11 2015 08: 38
      So they want to eat a fish and not choke on a bone! (read not justified ... sya!)
    4. 0
      April 11 2015 11: 38
      if you yourself are afraid to fly, let the Ukrainian cyborgs land!
  6. +6
    April 11 2015 08: 00
    Why in the photo of the Su-35? Also not professional!
    1. +1
      April 11 2015 08: 01
      Probably for color.
    2. sims2000
      -1
      April 11 2015 08: 04
      This is not a SU-35 ... This is a Su-30, it seems.
      1. +6
        April 11 2015 08: 14
        Quote: siMS2000
        . This is the Su-30, it seems.

        Su 30 here, with plumage
        1. +2
          April 11 2015 08: 27
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          Su 30 here, with plumage

          Su30 is also without plumage-Amur, and in the photo article su27cm
          1. +2
            April 11 2015 08: 36
            Quote: twviewer
            Su30 is also without plumage-Amur

            This one?
            1. +2
              April 11 2015 08: 42
              Quote: Alexander Romanov
              This one?

              he doesn’t have a straight keel yet, but here it is beveled
              su30m2su30m2
              1. +6
                April 11 2015 08: 46
                Quote: twviewer
                he doesn’t have a straight keel yet, but here it is beveled

                And there is a MUZHIK, and TREE, Wo-o-o-o fellow ! --------------- lol
                1. +5
                  April 11 2015 08: 50
                  Quote: Corsair
                  And there is a MUZHIK, and TREE, Wow, fellow! --------------- lol

                  good
                  1. +1
                    April 11 2015 17: 03
                    Quote: twviewer
                    good

                    Man ... tree ..
                    su30m2su30m2
                    1. +2
                      April 11 2015 23: 14
                      Man .... two !!, tree ... three, no ... five !! smile
            2. +9
              April 11 2015 10: 04
              Not...............................
              1. 0
                April 12 2015 08: 06
                Kysh from our Baltic!
          2. 0
            April 11 2015 17: 00
            Quote: twviewer
            on the photo article su27cm

            in a google search for this photo, you can find the original in high resolution there you can see the "welded" air brake hatch, but it is not known on the su35, that is, in the photo to the article, the modernized 27th.
      2. 0
        April 11 2015 09: 14
        Yeah. Board 05 instead of Averyanov's wrecked saloon 04.
        1. 0
          April 11 2015 10: 38
          Correct you. The first Su30MKI fell at a salon in Bourges, and 04 (Su30MKI-4), thank God, successfully completed its flight life, from 2001 to 2009, from 2006 becoming Su30MKM-01, but after the same on-board 04. From 2009 it was transferred to SibNIA for ground tests.
          1. 0
            April 12 2015 23: 14
            intercepted the komesk, about the flight of the scout it was known in half a day ... He actually hangs there constantly, such things ...
  7. +15
    April 11 2015 08: 02
    Just the pilot of SU 27 acted professionally, let the Yankees know that you should not mess with the Russian Air Force
    1. +4
      April 11 2015 08: 26
      Quote: kursk87
      let the Yankees know that you should not mess with the Russian Air Force

      Exactly: otherwise it will come even closer, and with one grub, it will charge America in the eye! laughing
  8. +18
    April 11 2015 08: 02
    Six meters is cool, probably the point broke at the Amer pilots lol
    A separate hello to the Pentagon, fly more often winked
  9. +38
    April 11 2015 08: 02
    Here's the video for the article ... Jokes are bad with Russians (we love to play a trick))) good
    1. +17
      April 11 2015 08: 20
      This is not hooliganism, but politeness! We are polite. And curious. lol
      1. +7
        April 11 2015 09: 14
        And the curious.

        Let me correct you - we are LOVELY.
        Make the difference hi
    2. +3
      April 11 2015 08: 20
      MIKHAN. thank! Good video posted!
    3. +6
      April 11 2015 08: 54
      So here we are talking about a distance of 100 feet, and this is already 30 meters, not six ...
      1. +2
        April 11 2015 08: 58
        Quote: andj61
        So here we are talking about a distance of 100 feet, and this is already 30 meters, not six ...

        Six meters from fright)))) ... it seemed to the mattresses! Although everything can be .. Hooligan damn it! bully drinks
        1. +3
          April 11 2015 09: 57
          I have a strong feeling that our pilots have an unspoken task from the command:
          to promote the filling of diapers by our "partners" in every possible way. lol
      2. +1
        April 11 2015 14: 35
        You are not an American?)) You know, unlike them, that between Russia and the Sea of ​​Okhotsk and the Baltic Sea, in fact, it stretches out)))))) you just didn’t notice that these are two different incidents in two different seas of the same our immense?)) then it was 100 feet ... now apparently they decided to reduce it to 30 ... if it does not reach the pentagon, then they will start anal lubrication on the wing apparently ...
  10. +31
    April 11 2015 08: 03

    in the morning, as soon as I read the news, I was not too lazy to get an atlas and measure the distance from Yankosia to the Baltic request and immediately the question arose, what x ... do you need there?
    1. +1
      April 11 2015 09: 52
      This friend is quite satisfactory

      LOL
  11. +20
    April 11 2015 08: 03
    At such speeds, 6 meters, and is it unprofessional?
    1. +6
      April 11 2015 08: 47
      It’s just that they expected that upon reaching them a kilometer our pilot would ask them for permission to fly, but instead they would have gotten cracks at all. Here they are poor and offended. They are used to take-off and landing with a minimum of movements in their bucket, and here such a bully flew in neatly from the seats.
    2. Seawolf
      +4
      April 11 2015 09: 34
      It seems ours fly in formation, a distance of about 3 meters.
  12. +8
    April 11 2015 08: 03
    Quote: SAM 5
    Here p.indos vzdzdili that.

    Here are the bastards, they spoiled the whole Baltic with shit. Little Cook?
  13. +15
    April 11 2015 08: 03
    The pilot "su" is handsome! I wiped the snot on the yankers. Let them know - next time - kick the ass.
  14. +17
    April 11 2015 08: 03
    If they complain, then we are doing the right thing. Keep it up! And no crap for all p ... am fly in our sky. And if they fly into our space, then you need to shoot down without any. We have already passed "Do not open the fire", "Do not give in to provocations". This never stopped the aggressor and will not stop it.
    1. +11
      April 11 2015 08: 28
      Quote: Alexander72
      If they complain, then we are doing the right thing. Keep it up! And no crap for all p ... am fly in our sky. And if they fly into our space, then you need to shoot down without any. We have already passed "Do not open the fire", "Do not give in to provocations". This never stopped the aggressor and will not stop it.

      Exactly, we must succumb to provocations, so much so that no one is new to provoking us.
      It’s necessary to beat the provocateurs and then let the pentagons whimper, diplomats will fend off, as if by notes.

      1. +2
        April 11 2015 09: 31
        Cool bomb.
  15. +8
    April 11 2015 08: 04
    Drying after a reconnaissance plane flyby was forced to move away, so
    how the smell is about .......... I am American pilots was very unpleasant!
  16. +7
    April 11 2015 08: 05
    The bourgeoisie sawed down the schedule, about how the evil Russian Boeing was being fucked up.
  17. +12
    April 11 2015 08: 07
    The "non-professional" pilot has been awarded another military rank!
  18. +9
    April 11 2015 08: 08
    nothing to fly American planes not on their own continent. or they think that everything is allowed to them, nevermind
  19. +17
    April 11 2015 08: 08
    Americans simply cannot imagine themselves as victims.
    1. HAM
      +4
      April 11 2015 08: 23
      But it’s necessary. Although, they are already victims, and what O. Bender specified ....!
  20. +21
    April 11 2015 08: 17
    Not understood. Our unprofessional maneuver, and they professionally managed?
    1. +2
      April 11 2015 08: 32
      Quote: Stinger
      Not understood. Our unprofessional maneuver, and they professionally managed?


      No, they managed it professionally.
  21. +20
    April 11 2015 08: 18
    And who allowed these American monkeys to fly off the borders of Russia?
    Let the filthy creatures thank the Russian pilots that they weren’t ... shot down.
    Let the Pentagon fascists fly off the coast of America, so far it’s safe there.
    1. +8
      April 11 2015 08: 38
      Quote: Corsair5912
      Let the Pentagon fascists fly off the coast of America, so far it’s safe there.

      Not anymore. There sometimes our "vidmidiki" indulge in :))
  22. +8
    April 11 2015 08: 18
    I think ours was just boring ... what will you do when work is such a routine soldier
    But amerikosovskie pilots probably now "combat" will beg ... and will sue the Russian Air Force for moral damage!
  23. +3
    April 11 2015 08: 18
    Quote: fiction
    If cowards are what fly anywhere laughing

    And here I am about the same thing, they were put on a pair of shorts, because they warned more than once that they would fly in diapers.
  24. +6
    April 11 2015 08: 19
    "Duty flight to monitor the movements of Russian military aircraft."
    Well, we watched. Point blank. Che make a scandal? And in general, recently, the US communication style has been formed from two positions: assaults and hysteria. This is "unprofessional".
  25. +8
    April 11 2015 08: 19
    Well, people are not used to fighting), what to do ... Are you used to flying over the "ants" and beating quietly, but to have a rival in the air? Well, they haven't. That's scary for dudes!
    1. +5
      April 11 2015 09: 38
      Recently I read how they fought in Vietnam. According to certain signs of aircraft behavior, they saw who was in the cockpit - ours or the Vietnamese. If ours, they shouted on the air: "Vanya! I'm leaving!" and quickly dumped, and if Vietnamese, then shot down. I also read memoirs about A.I. Pokryshkin. While escorting the bombers in radio silence, he said on the radio: "I'm the hundredth! I'm going to work!" After that, not a single honored Luftwaffe pilot took off.
      So it is with these "professionals". The whole spirit fell into diapers. laughing
      1. -16
        April 11 2015 11: 11
        Stalingrad - Stalingrad, and, after all, it is quite possible that von Manstein would have put pressure on you, if not for Pokryshkin on the "ovsky" Aerocobra, PROTECTING you. And you would not blather out of business here. For the dull graduates of the Soviet academies, I EXPLAIN that my text is, of course, an ALLEGORY, especially I ask you not to cling.
        1. +9
          April 11 2015 11: 15
          Quote: Linkor200
          if not for Pokryshkin on the "ovsky" Aerocobra, PROTECTING you

          still ovsk would not have sold Hitler fuel and bearings through Switzerland)) might not have reached it.
        2. +2
          April 11 2015 17: 33
          Quote: Linkor200
          I EXPLAIN that My text - of course - ALLEGORY, I especially ask you not to cling.

          You would not meddle with your metamorphoses Ivan Petrov and at the end of your life you would grow up to Zilberman for example
  26. The comment was deleted.
  27. +5
    April 11 2015 08: 20
    It would be better to say thanks for not knocking
  28. +6
    April 11 2015 08: 20
    Not used to such emaricans. Give them a weak opponent, better unarmed.
  29. +8
    April 11 2015 08: 21
    The pilot is a real Russian pro. certainly deserved a reward.
  30. +7
    April 11 2015 08: 21
    Russian Air Force aircraft approached the American reconnaissance aircraft at a distance of 6 meters, "endangering the life of the American crew"
    ??? I.e, americos with a tape measure climbed out on the wing, and measured the distance ?! Well then, why the accusations against the Russians? They themselves endanger their lives! lol
    In general, let them say thank you that our "falcon" did not sit on the scruff of their neck to rest wassat
    1. +5
      April 11 2015 08: 35
      No, they were with a laser tape measure from the building market. In general, an interesting claim. We are here at your borders professionally scouting your Iskander, and you are barbarously interfering with us.
    2. +13
      April 11 2015 08: 41
      Quote: avia1991
      Russian Air Force aircraft approached the American reconnaissance aircraft at a distance of 6 meters, "endangering the life of the American crew"
      ??? I.e, americos with a tape measure climbed out on the wing, and measured the distance ?! Well then, why the accusations against the Russians? They themselves endanger their lives! lol
      In general, let them say thank you that our "falcon" did not sit on the scruff of their neck to rest wassat


      This is next time. Let them get used to ... u.
  31. +5
    April 11 2015 08: 21
    The pilot of the RC-135U report on the table once he is such a spectacle. And in general it’s dangerous to get involved with barbarians.
  32. +3
    April 11 2015 08: 22
    Lost mattresses a famous joke, where an angel and a devil made men of different nationalities jump from a bridge. The more threats, prohibitions and deprivations fall on the Russian, the more the enemy has a chance to scrape off to the fullest.
  33. +5
    April 11 2015 08: 22
    ... next time we will pee on their wing, and if they still fly, then right on the lantern .... well, you know what I mean. laughing
  34. +3
    April 11 2015 08: 22
    The professionalism of our pilots revealed the instillation of the American.
  35. +4
    April 11 2015 08: 28
    They along the way and saw him, probably only at a distance of six meters, scouts. :)
  36. +4
    April 11 2015 08: 29
    Respect for our pilots hi hi hi Let them continue laughing
  37. +4
    April 11 2015 08: 29
    As we can and fly, we fly well and even very well. NATO flight on duty - interception on the Air Force of the Russian Federation, get used to gentlemen.
    1. +2
      April 11 2015 08: 39
      Yes, here’s a complete merger of the aircraft and crew! And it’s not a sin to demonstrate it.
      1. +6
        April 11 2015 11: 02
        Quote: reut.sib
        Yes, here’s a complete merger of the aircraft and crew! And it’s not a sin to demonstrate it.

        The video is not entirely in the subject, BUT, if SO we have airborne pilots flying at the little Ka-226, then we can imagine WHAT Air Force pilots can soldier
        1. 0
          April 11 2015 20: 39
          and missiles cling to him?
          1. 0
            April 12 2015 09: 04
            Quote: 71ss_man
            and missiles cling to him?

            Anything you want - the Ka-226 has a modular design, you can hang anything hi There is an option with weapons, India buys it for its border troops hi
  38. +11
    April 11 2015 08: 30
    So, I did not understand, today is already April 11th, three days have passed since April 7th, and our Foreign Ministry has not yet protested that:
    - Amerikosovsky plane did not signal a friend or foe.
    - Amerikosovsky aircraft posed a threat to civilian aircraft
    - Amerikosovskie pilots spoiled the waters of the Baltic
    It is urgent to correct this defect of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
    1. Seawolf
      +5
      April 11 2015 09: 57
      Yes, our campaign again experienced electronic warfare
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. 0
        April 11 2015 21: 01
        Fantasy! In Crimea, too, there was something. There was no connection with the command of the Armed Forces in Kuev. They even tried to deliver the order to the border guards on purpose. But he was intercepted.
    2. 0
      April 11 2015 15: 50
      Yes, they already answered ... Everything is fine www.rg.ru/2015/04/11/minoboroni.html
  39. +1
    April 11 2015 08: 32
    Probably the toilet was full and squealed. They can be without rules, but we can’t? Maybe our pilot wanted to say hello to them. Well, and probably, as it should be, he showed that under the wing, just in case, so that they would not think about nonsense.
  40. +3
    April 11 2015 08: 33
    And about 6 meters in question, if the video shows 100 feet, and this is about 30 meters. Fear has big eyes?
  41. +2
    April 11 2015 08: 33
    ah kakiya nervous)))))
  42. kelevra
    +3
    April 11 2015 08: 37
    Unprofessional, yes, this is our chip, to get on the nerves to girls from NATO and the USA!
  43. +1
    April 11 2015 08: 40
    Poor, everyone was nervous.)))
  44. Viktor Kudinov
    +2
    April 11 2015 08: 41
    And what was there to be afraid of! Our pilot just wanted to ask their pilot "Is there a smoke!" request
  45. +3
    April 11 2015 08: 43
    This is news, in the morning. Class, better can only be the surrender of Kiev obscurantism. The day was set. Thanks to our ASAM.
  46. +4
    April 11 2015 08: 46
    They are furious, because until such a "unprofessional" their pilots (and aircraft ...) still grow and grow! laughing
    Bravo to our aces!
  47. +8
    April 11 2015 08: 51
    Yes, hell there, unprofessional! Themselves bzdumo! A man well done, you look from the Air Force amersky pilots will begin to quit ...
  48. +3
    April 11 2015 08: 51
    Yes, that they are twitching, he just flew up and left without doing, nor any previous shots!
  49. BAT
    +5
    April 11 2015 08: 54
    Let them say thank you that the Russian "non-professionals" did not open "unprofessional" fire ...
  50. +9
    April 11 2015 08: 55
    Prepared for the parade, keep a distance.
  51. +2
    April 11 2015 08: 57
    WHO WILL COME TO US WITH A SWORD AND GET FUCKED!!!
  52. +2
    April 11 2015 08: 59
    How are our bears, TU-95, pinched over the English Channel and in the North Sea? I recently saw it on the box.
    Our guys just smile...: He shook his wings, they say I need to turn - they moved away. He turned and they pressed together again. Let's go normally.
    And this is all confirmed by the video. Regular work.

    And Americans are always hysterical.

    They have already written to their mistresses and wives and mothers and grandmothers about their feat. And they submitted reports on the accrual of a bonus in the amount of 10 annual salaries, as well as assistance from a personal psychologist, urologist, and proctologist for the rest of their lives.
  53. +2
    April 11 2015 09: 05
    On the morning of April 7, an American RC-135U aircraft, performing a regular flight in international airspace, was intercepted by a Russian Su-27 at an unsafe distance and in an unprofessional manner, performing an unsafe maneuver.

    It was also necessary to shoot it down unsafely, that the US plane forgot over the waters of the Baltic??? It was necessary to recognize it as a UFO and end up in the water, that is, to the bottom!!!
  54. +1
    April 11 2015 09: 08
    The Pentagon is complaining

    We need to be more careful... hi

  55. +2
    April 11 2015 09: 11
    I am proud that we have such highly professional pilots, the heirs of Chkalov and Pokryshkin. Well done!
    1. Seawolf
      0
      April 11 2015 09: 37
      We watched the film "Case in Square 36-80", based on real events. And how then can one explain the action of the American pilot in relation to ours? From which ours emerged victorious and with dignity.
  56. +3
    April 11 2015 09: 12
    Quote: zzz
    There's definitely no need to apologize! If you are afraid, don’t do it, but if you did it, don’t be afraid. We need to stop making excuses.

    There's no point in flying if you're afraid! Our pilots are not Yemeni or Iraqi. The norms and rules (American ones) are shoved tightly into your ass. They are ready to fight with a strong enemy according to the rules, with a break for lunch, but with weak ones they don’t give a damn!
    In general, we need to pin.... owls in place wherever possible - in the air, at a resort, etc. So that they will always be afraid of only one mention - RUSSIAN! angry
  57. +1
    April 11 2015 09: 16
    piss)))
  58. Dudu
    +3
    April 11 2015 09: 23
    Well, he didn’t let him go ahead, didn’t bow humbly and didn’t stand on the sidelines waiting, but brazenly rubbed the Amer’s barrel until the intestines burst and the rear exhaust gases became prohibitively loud, which made the pilot in the cockpit feel faint. What an impudent fellow!
  59. +1
    April 11 2015 09: 25
    Glorious American warriors can only fight with the absolutely unarmed, the weak, women, children, and the elderly. Seeing what can really stop and destroy these “warriors”, they flee from the battlefield in fear. “And this makes me happy” “The process has begun” (Phrases of a famous American spy) and after that let them remember “Selfless”!
  60. 0
    April 11 2015 09: 38
    Damn, what if it were a MiG-31.
    The crew's waste would begin to fall into the sea from its excess.
    Then sue for pollution.
  61. 0
    April 11 2015 09: 39
    They probably screwed up again. There was no need to follow us. soldier
  62. Seawolf
    +1
    April 11 2015 09: 41
    I wonder if during the battle they will also complain that they are being shot down not according to (their) rules?
  63. 0
    April 11 2015 09: 43
    Why are they so afraid of these Sushki?
    1. Seawolf
      0
      April 11 2015 09: 46
      They are not only afraid of our dryers. They are afraid of even just the word “Russians”.
  64. +1
    April 11 2015 09: 46
    Quote: KBR109
    Tell these animals what is dangerous (for aerobatic teams, wassat belay but this is not necessary to say) a distance of less than 1 meter is considered.
    It is absolutely certain that at the 65th anniversary of the Victory, the joint flight of Swifts and VITYAZES was precisely at intervals of 1 meter. Yes
  65. Bashkaus
    0
    April 11 2015 09: 48
    But on the contrary, it seems to me that you can confidently enter the “score zone” of the C135 as much as 6m only if the pilot and the machine have merged into a single whole :/ On the other hand, if the Su27 pilot showed indecent gestures at the same time, then this is really not the case gentlemanly towards colleagues! ;)
  66. Seawolf
    +1
    April 11 2015 09: 51
    How are they even going to fight us? Or do they think that they will shoot at our planes at a safe distance? This is how our planes began to be equipped with electronic warfare.
    You'll have to fight in close maneuver combat like in WWII. And only our planes are equipped with cannons.
    1. 0
      April 11 2015 15: 40
      Why allow the adversary to fly close, there is no need to pamper.
  67. -1
    April 11 2015 10: 05
    I’m already so tired of all this (I used to tolerate everything normally, but something has changed.
    news ...America...Ukraine....America...Ukraine....fascism...sanctions.....sanctions....rub
    l-dollar......import substitution....fascism...America...Ukraine...Baltic states...

    I just don’t have the strength anymore, I deleted all the news from the browser and blocked them everywhere... I deleted news channels from cable and the Internet... I left only the culture channel and radio culture as well as widgets on cultural life. After a couple of weeks I felt like a different person. IMHO, I think I’m just tired of all this crap.... Well, VO is no exception either. IMHO the geopolitical insanity of planet earth has simply gone off scale.
  68. 0
    April 11 2015 10: 07
    Handsome guys!!! 6 meters is a master. No need for anyone to fly here
  69. +1
    April 11 2015 10: 10
    ...in an unprofessional manner, ...


    -If he had done it professionally, then the American would have been feeding the bulls for a long time.

  70. 0
    April 11 2015 10: 24
    From the memories of Private Raenn, then, son, I understood from WHICH place adrenaline is released...
  71. 0
    April 11 2015 10: 24
    From the memories of Private Raenn, then, son, I understood from WHICH place adrenaline is released...
  72. +1
    April 11 2015 10: 27
    Quote: Thunderbolt
    Not...............................

    What a beautiful car!
  73. +2
    April 11 2015 10: 36
    I am extremely glad that there are soldiers in the Russian Air Force who are capable of acting so unprofessionally. laughing Pleasantly proud of the armed forces of his native country good Why do they call them barbarians...yes, we are Asians :)))

    Zillions - you. We - the darkness and darkness and darkness.
    Try, fight with us!
    Yes, we are Scythians! Yes, Asians - we,
    With slanted and greedy eyes!


    No, no matter what you say, Blok often got to the root of it:

    Come to us! From the horrors of war
    Come in peace hugs!
    Before it's too late - the old sword in the sheath,
    Comrades! We will become - brothers!

    And if not - we have nothing to lose,
    And we are not above treachery!
    Century, centuries you will be curse
    Sick later offspring!
  74. 0
    April 11 2015 10: 40
    What do you think? Nobody died. Why yell? Or the plane cannot be restored after this pilot, because... They couldn’t wash it and disinfect it, so they had to write it off. And as far as I know, after every such incident, their pilots refuse to fly - they are cowards. Let's remember Cook.
  75. 0
    April 11 2015 10: 43
    Americans, our pilots are very “unprofessional”, so in order for anything to happen, get away from our borders! Better fly over Greenland...
  76. +1
    April 11 2015 10: 45
    You can be ironic about the phobias of your adversary. But for me it is more important that the skill of the flight crew rises to the appropriate level.
  77. 0
    April 11 2015 10: 49
    Russian fighter pilot acted 'unprofessionally'

    It looks like the Americans have another shitty crew wink
  78. RDK-Surgut
    0
    April 11 2015 10: 51
    They should have fired paint balls and let them wash them off later...
  79. 0
    April 11 2015 10: 55
    If you screwed up, then say so...))
  80. INF
    +1
    April 11 2015 11: 03
    What Russian doesn't like to fly fast?
  81. +1
    April 11 2015 11: 09
    (that the RC-135U was performing a “duty flight to monitor the movements of Russian military aircraft”) Well, the Russian Su-27 was doing the same thing, monitoring the movements of Yankee aircraft. And what to find out here through diplomatic channels is difficult for them to understand without this, apparently, or they are screwing Vanka, as they say in Russia.
  82. 0
    April 11 2015 11: 13
    [quote=Cheshire]But you don’t have to apologize.[
    I don't see a reason
  83. 0
    April 11 2015 11: 24
    The Pentagon complains about the “barbaric” interception of an RC-135U reconnaissance aircraft by a Russian Su-27 in the skies over the Baltic /
    Who are they complaining to? Lamb or the UN? their leverage over ours and the Air Force is useless.
    Let them call Putin on the direct line on April 15.
  84. 0
    April 11 2015 11: 25
    Glory to the Russian Air Force!!!!! soldier
  85. 0
    April 11 2015 11: 26
    So that they would know whose cones are in the forest!
  86. 0
    April 11 2015 11: 33
    Well, our pilots fly like this, their teachers flew under bridges in the 30s, rammed the enemy in the Patriotic War. They like to fly close and blow a kiss, and that’s what the Americans were so worried about. If you don’t have experience, invite ours to join you as an instructor.
    1. Seawolf
      +1
      April 11 2015 13: 31
      They rammed not only in WWII, but also later on jets. The same Yankees.

      The Russian ram is not a kamikaze, it’s a professional. Which, while destroying the enemy’s aircraft, keeps its own intact.
  87. 0
    April 11 2015 11: 35
    Quote: figvam
    Apparently Russia should provide an air corridor over the Baltic for American spies. No! to the perpindos, they were shown that their place in the bucket ...

    Good afternoon to you! Please pay attention to the fact that all this happened in the “international airspace zone”, so that there can be no talk of any corridor over the Baltic.
  88. 0
    April 11 2015 11: 35
    Because there's no point in spying.
  89. 0
    April 11 2015 11: 41
    Between and the edges - quarrels and abuse.
  90. 0
    April 11 2015 11: 58
    Learn mattress makers.
  91. +1
    April 11 2015 12: 01
    And how they “intercept” ours, nothing, they keep quiet. But then they got scared.
  92. +1
    April 11 2015 12: 04
    At the same time, all radio-electronic equipment on board the RC-135U was turned off.
  93. 0
    April 11 2015 12: 05
    If he had a can of condensed milk, you would actually sit down on the instruments!
  94. 0
    April 11 2015 12: 08
    “barbaric”... this is still correct... let the Amer fly and write a report of dismissal like the sailors did with Cook... and to psychologists... to psychologists...
  95. 0
    April 11 2015 12: 16
    "The Russian fighter pilot acted 'unprofessionally' by approaching an American aircraft at an 'unsafe distance' and performing an 'unsafe maneuver'"
    Or maybe, on the contrary, our pilot acted professionally. The American pilots have forgotten how to fly like that and have become lazy.
    1. Seawolf
      +1
      April 11 2015 13: 34
      Their planes are simply not capable of what ours are capable of.
  96. 0
    April 11 2015 12: 21
    Have they never heard of such a technique as an aerial ram?
    1. Seawolf
      +1
      April 11 2015 13: 35
      Ramming is a skill that is mastered by Russians.
      The point of a ram is not to die along with the enemy, but to destroy the enemy while preserving your plane.
  97. 0
    April 11 2015 12: 28
    Quote: Cheshire
    For wisdom, it has long been necessary. Then you can always apologize.
    And you can not apologize.

    And why apologize? Our plane was also over neutral waters (I don’t want to fly), there was no disaster, no photos or videos. They saw it! hi
  98. 0
    April 11 2015 12: 43
    No one is forbidden to complain and cry. soldier
  99. +1
    April 11 2015 13: 00
    Are you offended? Well, just like children! So take your “toys” and leave. Business!
  100. +2
    April 11 2015 13: 00
    The pilot performed a jewel maneuver. His actions are super professional. Soon Russian pilots will start draining fuel from American planes in the air and unscrewing the nuts))))