Dahl is calling! ..
The closer the revival of conscription service in Lithuania, the more details about this appear in the Lithuanian media. Moreover, some details are of such a nature, which gives reason to doubt the seriousness of the undertaking of Mrs. Grybauskaite and Defense Minister Olekas. Before considering the details of the draft service reanimated in Lithuania, it should be recalled that officially young Lithuanians (aged from 19 to 26 years) will be recruited into the Lithuanian army from September of the current year. The initiative of the Ministry of Defense was supported by President Dalia Grybauskaite, and the initiative is also welcomed in Parliament.
So, about the details and problems of the lit-conscription, which the head of the defense department of the Baltic republic Juozas Olekas shares.
It turned out that more than others, the resumption of conscription service (for the term of 9 months) was attended to, no, not even mixed rights defenders, but banks. In Lithuania, the situation is such that the majority of financial and credit organizations operating in the country are structural elements of large and not quite large European banks. So, these same banks, as soon as they learned about the plans of the Lithuanian Ministry of Defense, immediately stated that if the draftee had an outstanding loan, then the financial institution was not going to delay payment. Like, let him serve, but only either relatives should pay for the young man, or after nine months of service he will have to repay not only the loan with interest, but also fines for late payments.
Based on the fact that one of the first pitfalls of the lit-appeal was banking institutions, it can be stated that Lithuania is “completely in the European Union”, and Vilnius, which seems to care about its security, should put money above all. The banking message is: here’s how Lithuanian loans, if he has them (and judging by statistics, they have about 38% of potential recruits), pay off, so let the uniform of a conscript soldier put on…
Minister Olekas is trying to justify himself and states that negotiations were underway with the banks, but it was not possible to persuade the financiers to postpone payment of loans and interest. Lithuanian banks agreed to wait for the repayment of the debt on the loan itself, but the interest of the draftee (potential draftee) is still required to pay even during the service.
And what about the credit obligations of the recruit (if there are such obligations for the recruit) are things in Russia? In the Russian case, there is also no official delay provided by the bank, whether by the military registration and enlistment office for a person who becomes a draftee and in fact loses to repay the loan debt. However, in Russia, statistics on “pre-conscripts” - debtors are different than in Lithuania. If in Lithuania there are those of 38%, then in Russia there is about 14%. Not at all ... But in Russia, people who are faced with such a situation have the opportunity to take advantage of Article 451 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation "Amendment and termination of the contract due to a significant change in circumstances."
From paragraph 1 Art. 451 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation:
In other words, if the bank did not manage to register the corresponding section in the font of the 7 th point on the 67 page of the 125-page contract, then the recruit has every chance to achieve the termination of the contract. There is, however, an option in which the court can take the side of a conscript, even if the bank has managed to push through the corresponding element in the loan agreement.
The 4 clause of the same 451 article reads:
This item, as it turns out, helped tens of thousands of Russian draftees, who were not afraid of going to court, to achieve a review of the loan agreement with simultaneous debt restructuring.
Returning to Lithuania and its appeal-credit peripetias, which prevent Mrs. Grybauskaite from knocking together “an efficient army of recruits” (and there are already thousands of them planned for 3,5), it can be stated that Vilnius has a much more significant problem. Mr. Olekas states that if suddenly a draftee (and in Lithuania young men of military age around 90 thousand) evades the “military service”, then a truly “terrible” punishment awaits him from the state. The whole “horror” of the punishment is that the court will oblige the court to pay a fine in the amount of 144 to 289 euro.
Not thousands of euros, but just euros ... This raises the question: how does Defense Minister Olekas consider whether potential Lithuanian conscripts will bother if they have the opportunity to save the required amount at school lunches, pay the fine and forget about the need to "resist Russian aggression" ... And even more so, will recruits think about how to postpone payments for a loan taken to buy, for example, a car for 10 thousand euros, if you can from Mr. Olekas along with his call to get rid of LaToya some 150 euros ...
But the minister, not without pride, reports that now the literary conscript cannot say that he did not appear at the military registration and enlistment office, since he did not receive the summons. The agenda will be handed to his relatives and employers with a “strong request to transfer”. This Olekas is ridiculous, really ... And why does the minister think that a potential draftee will not say that neither the parents nor the employer handed him the summons? Well, they lost the agenda, and that’s all ... Grandpa accidentally went to the toilet with her ...
Further more! In the Lithuanian Ministry of Defense, they are pondering over how to deal with young people of military age who went to work outside the country to work.
From the law “On Conscription”:
This item commented on the Minister Olekas (quote portal Delphi):
Address from London or address in Taurage? If it’s still in London, then the recruit can leave the address in the style of “Baker Street, 221B” ... Olekas himself will go to look for him, or send someone? does he leave Lithuania forever? Will they not let him out, or will again “people in black” come to the address in a “difficult moment for the country”? Will Lithuania have enough "people in black" for all those leaving the country ... And does this mean that Lithuanian embassies will now receive a directive to track the movement of potential recruits with Lithuanian passports on the territory of foreign states? For the euro 144 fine, this is certainly true ...
Well, and in order for the Lithuanian army to reach out for volunteers, the minister announces that financial rewards are waiting for conscripts: Euro 2633 for those "who showed themselves very well", Euro 2291 for those who served well, and 1949 (why for the Baltic, the number in 1940?) euro for "those who served satisfactorily". And if he served “badly” and tried to sing “Katyusha” on an evening walk, did Olekas provide for responsibility? Or in the Lithuanian army "Losers" will not be? ..
So, about the details and problems of the lit-conscription, which the head of the defense department of the Baltic republic Juozas Olekas shares.
It turned out that more than others, the resumption of conscription service (for the term of 9 months) was attended to, no, not even mixed rights defenders, but banks. In Lithuania, the situation is such that the majority of financial and credit organizations operating in the country are structural elements of large and not quite large European banks. So, these same banks, as soon as they learned about the plans of the Lithuanian Ministry of Defense, immediately stated that if the draftee had an outstanding loan, then the financial institution was not going to delay payment. Like, let him serve, but only either relatives should pay for the young man, or after nine months of service he will have to repay not only the loan with interest, but also fines for late payments.
Based on the fact that one of the first pitfalls of the lit-appeal was banking institutions, it can be stated that Lithuania is “completely in the European Union”, and Vilnius, which seems to care about its security, should put money above all. The banking message is: here’s how Lithuanian loans, if he has them (and judging by statistics, they have about 38% of potential recruits), pay off, so let the uniform of a conscript soldier put on…
Minister Olekas is trying to justify himself and states that negotiations were underway with the banks, but it was not possible to persuade the financiers to postpone payment of loans and interest. Lithuanian banks agreed to wait for the repayment of the debt on the loan itself, but the interest of the draftee (potential draftee) is still required to pay even during the service.
And what about the credit obligations of the recruit (if there are such obligations for the recruit) are things in Russia? In the Russian case, there is also no official delay provided by the bank, whether by the military registration and enlistment office for a person who becomes a draftee and in fact loses to repay the loan debt. However, in Russia, statistics on “pre-conscripts” - debtors are different than in Lithuania. If in Lithuania there are those of 38%, then in Russia there is about 14%. Not at all ... But in Russia, people who are faced with such a situation have the opportunity to take advantage of Article 451 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation "Amendment and termination of the contract due to a significant change in circumstances."
From paragraph 1 Art. 451 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation:
A significant change in the circumstances from which the parties proceeded at the conclusion of the contract is the basis for its change or termination, unless otherwise provided by the contract or follows from its essence.
A change of circumstances is considered significant when they have changed so much that if the parties could reasonably foresee this, the contract would not have been concluded by them at all or would have been concluded on significantly different conditions.
A change of circumstances is considered significant when they have changed so much that if the parties could reasonably foresee this, the contract would not have been concluded by them at all or would have been concluded on significantly different conditions.
In other words, if the bank did not manage to register the corresponding section in the font of the 7 th point on the 67 page of the 125-page contract, then the recruit has every chance to achieve the termination of the contract. There is, however, an option in which the court can take the side of a conscript, even if the bank has managed to push through the corresponding element in the loan agreement.
The 4 clause of the same 451 article reads:
Amendment of the contract due to a significant change in circumstances is allowed by a court decision in exceptional cases when termination of the contract is contrary to the public interest or entails damage to the parties, far exceeding the costs necessary to execute the contract on conditions changed by the court.
This item, as it turns out, helped tens of thousands of Russian draftees, who were not afraid of going to court, to achieve a review of the loan agreement with simultaneous debt restructuring.
Returning to Lithuania and its appeal-credit peripetias, which prevent Mrs. Grybauskaite from knocking together “an efficient army of recruits” (and there are already thousands of them planned for 3,5), it can be stated that Vilnius has a much more significant problem. Mr. Olekas states that if suddenly a draftee (and in Lithuania young men of military age around 90 thousand) evades the “military service”, then a truly “terrible” punishment awaits him from the state. The whole “horror” of the punishment is that the court will oblige the court to pay a fine in the amount of 144 to 289 euro.
Not thousands of euros, but just euros ... This raises the question: how does Defense Minister Olekas consider whether potential Lithuanian conscripts will bother if they have the opportunity to save the required amount at school lunches, pay the fine and forget about the need to "resist Russian aggression" ... And even more so, will recruits think about how to postpone payments for a loan taken to buy, for example, a car for 10 thousand euros, if you can from Mr. Olekas along with his call to get rid of LaToya some 150 euros ...
But the minister, not without pride, reports that now the literary conscript cannot say that he did not appear at the military registration and enlistment office, since he did not receive the summons. The agenda will be handed to his relatives and employers with a “strong request to transfer”. This Olekas is ridiculous, really ... And why does the minister think that a potential draftee will not say that neither the parents nor the employer handed him the summons? Well, they lost the agenda, and that’s all ... Grandpa accidentally went to the toilet with her ...
Further more! In the Lithuanian Ministry of Defense, they are pondering over how to deal with young people of military age who went to work outside the country to work.
From the law “On Conscription”:
If a person of military age leaves for another country permanently or temporarily, longer than 6 months, no later than one month after departure, the relevant defense department must be informed about the departure, indicate his place of residence, work, study.
This item commented on the Minister Olekas (quote portal Delphi):
If a person travels more than 6 months to wash the dishes in London, then he is obliged to leave his address so that he knows that he is leaving for London, and does not live in Taurage.
Address from London or address in Taurage? If it’s still in London, then the recruit can leave the address in the style of “Baker Street, 221B” ... Olekas himself will go to look for him, or send someone? does he leave Lithuania forever? Will they not let him out, or will again “people in black” come to the address in a “difficult moment for the country”? Will Lithuania have enough "people in black" for all those leaving the country ... And does this mean that Lithuanian embassies will now receive a directive to track the movement of potential recruits with Lithuanian passports on the territory of foreign states? For the euro 144 fine, this is certainly true ...
Well, and in order for the Lithuanian army to reach out for volunteers, the minister announces that financial rewards are waiting for conscripts: Euro 2633 for those "who showed themselves very well", Euro 2291 for those who served well, and 1949 (why for the Baltic, the number in 1940?) euro for "those who served satisfactorily". And if he served “badly” and tried to sing “Katyusha” on an evening walk, did Olekas provide for responsibility? Or in the Lithuanian army "Losers" will not be? ..
Information