Nuclear submarines of Russia (2015)

Current photos of the composition of nuclear submarines in Russia:

1. Strategic missile submarine cruiser K-535 "Yuri Dolgoruky" of the Borey project 955. Year of entry into the fleet - 2012


2. Strategic missile submarine cruiser K-550 "Alexander Nevsky" of 955 "Borey" project. Year of entry into the fleet - 2013.


3. Strategic missile submarine cruiser K-551 "Vladimir Monomakh" of the 955 "Borey" project. Year of entry into the fleet - 2014


4. Strategic missile submarine cruiser Prince Vladimir of the Borey project 955. Laid - 2012 year.


5. Strategic missile submarine cruiser "Prince Oleg" of the Borey 955 project. Laid - 2014 year


6. Strategic missile submarine “Generalissimo Suvorov” of the Borey project 955. Laid - 2014 year


7. Multipurpose nuclear submarine torpedo with cruise missiles K-560 "Severodvinsk" project 885 "Ash" Year of entry into the fleet - 2013


8. A multipurpose nuclear submarine torpedo with K-561 Kazan klyant missiles of the YN project 885. Laid - 2009 year


9. Multi-purpose nuclear submarine torpedo with cruise missiles K-573 "Novosibirsk" project 885 "Ash". Laid - 2013 year


10. Multipurpose nuclear submarine torpedo with cruise missiles K-173 "Krasnoyarsk" project 885 "Ash". Laid - 2014 year


11. Strategic missile submarine cruiser TK-208 "Dmitry Donskoy" of the 941UM "Shark" project. Year of entry into the fleet - 1981


12. Strategic missile submarine cruiser TK-17 "Arkhangelsk" of the 941 "Shark" project. Year of entry into the fleet - 1987. Status - awaiting disposal


13. Strategic missile cruiser missile TK-20 "Severstal" project 941 "Shark". Year of entry into the fleet - 1989. Status - awaiting disposal


14. Strategic missile submarine cruiser K-223 "Podolsk" project 667BDR "Kalmar". Year of entry into the fleet - 1979


15. Strategic missile submarine cruiser K-433 "St. George the Victorious" of the 667BDR Kalmar project. Year of entry into the fleet - 1980.


16. Strategic missile submarine cruiser K-44 "Ryazan" of the 667BDR Kalmar project. Year of entry into the fleet - 1982. Status - is under repair


17. Strategic missile submarine cruiser K-51 “Verkhoturye” of the project 667BDRM “Dolphin”. Year of entry into the fleet - 1984


18. Strategic missile submarine cruiser K-84 "Ekaterinburg" of the project 667BDRM "Dolphin". Year of entry into the fleet - 1985


19. Strategic missile submarine cruiser K-114 “Tula” of the project 667BDRM “Dolphin”. Year of entry into the fleet - 1987. Status - is under repair


20. Strategic missile submarine cruiser K-117 "Bryansk" of the project 667BDRM "Dolphin". Year of entry into the fleet - 1988


21. Strategic missile submarine cruiser K-18 "Karelia" of the project 667BDRM "Dolphin". Year of entry into the fleet - 1989


22. Strategic missile submarine cruiser K-407 "Novomoskovsk" project 667BDRM "Dolphin". Year of entry into the fleet - 1990


23. Nuclear submarine with cruise missiles K-132 "Irkutsk" project 949A "Antey". Year of entry into the fleet - 1988. Status - is under repair


24. Nuclear submarine with cruise missiles K-119 "Voronezh" project 949A "Antey". Year of entry into the fleet - 1989


25. Nuclear submarine with cruise missiles K-410 "Smolensk" project 949A "Antey". Year of entry into the fleet - 1990


26. Nuclear submarine with cruise missiles K-442 "Chelyabinsk" project 949A "Antey". Year of entry into the fleet - 1990. Status - is under repair


27. Nuclear submarine with cruise missiles K-456 "Tver" project 949A "Antey". Year of entry into the fleet - 1992


28. Nuclear submarine with cruise missiles K-266 "Eagle" project 949A "Antey". Year of entry into the fleet - 1992. Status - is under repair


29. Nuclear submarine with cruise missiles K-186 "Omsk" project 949A "Antey". Year of entry into the fleet - 1993.


30. Nuclear submarine with cruise missiles K-150 "Tomsk" project 949A "Antey" "Dolphin". Year of entry into the fleet - 1996. Status - is under repair


31. Nuclear submarine torpedo B-388 "Petrozavodsk" project 671РТМК "Schuka". Year of entry into the fleet - 1988.


32. Nuclear submarine torpedo B-414 "Daniel of Moscow" project 671RTMK "Schuka". Year of entry into the fleet - 1990


33. Nuclear submarine torpedo B-138 "Obninsk" project 671РТМК "Pike". Year of entry into the fleet - 1990


34. Nuclear submarine torpedo B-448 "Tambov" project 671 RTMK "Pike". Year of entry into the fleet - 1992. Status - is under repair


35. Nuclear submarine torpedo K-322 "Sperm Whale" project 971 "Pike-B". Year of entry into the fleet - 1988. Status - is under repair


36. Nuclear submarine torpedo K-391 "Bratsk" project 971 "Pike-B". Year of entry into the fleet - 1989. Status - is under repair


37. Nuclear submarine torpedo K-331 "Magadan" project 971 "Pike-B". Year of entry into the fleet - 1990


38. Nuclear submarine torpedo K-317 "Panther" project 971 "Pike-B". Year of entry into the fleet - 1990


39. Nuclear submarine torpedo K-461 "Wolf" project 971 "Pike-B". Year of entry into the fleet - 1991. Status - is under repair


40. Nuclear submarine torpedo K-328 "Leopard" project 971 "Pike-B". Year of entry into the fleet - 1992. Status - is under repair


41. Submarine nuclear torpedo K-419 "Kuzbass" project 971 "Pike-B". Year of entry into the fleet - 1992. Status - is under repair


42. Nuclear submarine torpedo K-154 "Tiger" project 971 "Pike-B". Year of entry into the fleet - 1993


43. Nuclear submarine torpedo K-295 "Samara" project 971 "Pike-B". Year of entry into the fleet - 1995. Status - is under repair


44. Nuclear submarine torpedo K-157 "Vepr" project 971 "Pike-B". Year of entry into the fleet - 1995. Status - is in conservation


45. Nuclear submarine torpedo K-335 "Cheetah project 971" Pike-B ". Year of entry into the fleet - 2001


46. Nuclear submarine torpedo B-239 "Carp" project 945 "Barracuda". Year of entry into the fleet - 1984. Status - is under repair


47. Nuclear submarine torpedo B-276 "Kostroma" project 945 "Barracuda". Year of entry into the fleet - 1987


48. Nuclear submarine torpedo B-534 "Nizhny Novgorod" project 945A "Condor". Year of entry into the fleet - 1990


49. Nuclear submarine torpedo B-336 "Pskov" project 945A "Condor". Year of entry into the fleet - 1993. Status - is under repair


50. Special purpose nuclear submarine АС-31 of the 10831 “Wicket” project. Year of entry into the fleet - 2010


51. Special purpose nuclear submarine АС-35 of the 18511 Nelma project. Year of entry into the fleet - 1995


52. Special purpose nuclear submarine АС-21 of the 18511 Nelma project. Year of entry into the fleet - 1991


53. Special purpose nuclear submarine АС-23 of the 18511 Nelma project. Year of entry into the fleet - 1986. Status - is under repair


54. Special purpose nuclear submarine АС-13 of the project 1910 "Kashalot". Year of entry into the fleet - 1986. Status - is under repair


55. Special purpose nuclear submarine АС-15 of the project 1910 "Kashalot". Year of entry into the fleet - 1991. Status - is under repair


56. Special purpose nuclear submarine АС-33 of the project 1910 "Kashalot". Year of entry into the fleet - 1994


57. Scientific research nuclear submarine BS-64 "Moscow region". Year of entry into the fleet - 1986. Status - is under repair


58. Special nuclear submarine "Belgorod" project 949А \ 09852. Laid - 2012 year


59. Special nuclear submarine "Khabarovsk" project 09851. Laid - 2014 year

60. Large submarine of special purpose project 09786 KS-129 "Orenburg". Joining the fleet - 1982 year

Comments

[ps-1972]

Thank you for the article. It’s a pity, many boats are under repair (

[Bombardier]

Quote: ps-1972

Thank you for the article. It’s a pity, many boats are under repair (

It’s more correct to say that it’s a pity that the period in our history that brought our boats (almost new at that time!) To a state of unsuitability, and the fact that they are already under repair, can be said to be saved, our submarine fleet is resuscitated. But your idea is clear and I join her.

[Arberes]

Quote: Bombardier

and the fact that the repair is already good, we can say that they are being saved, our submarine fleet is reanimated.

The variety of projects presented by the author amazes me! Submarines of all stripes (I apologize for the rough comparison), maybe you shouldn’t do this? Two or three projects and good? Here on the topic of repair! It turns out that almost every submarine needs parts of this particular project, I doubt that they can be interchangeable or am I wrong?
Thank you very much for the photo review!
Large nuclear submarine of special purpose project 09786 KS-129
"Orenburg" this is the first time I saw this boat!

[silver_roman]

and "under repair" - is it a literal meaning or is it just idle? work is going on? and then half of the nuclear submarine is under repair!

[Tigr]

Quote: silver_roman

and "under repair" - is it a literal meaning or is it just idle? work is going on? and then half of the nuclear submarine is under repair!

K-114 "Tula" pr.667BDRM from December 15, 2014 arrived at the Zvezdochka CS to carry out scheduled factory repairs according to the technical condition and extend the service life.
B-336 "Pskov" pr. 945A - restoration of technical readiness in 2011-15. inclusive (launched in March 2014) at the Nerpa shipyard.
B-276 "Kostroma" pr.945 in the technical reserve of the 2nd category, awaiting medium repair and modernization (according to the 2015-17 plan at the Zvyozdochka CS).
B-448 "Tambov" pr. 671RTMK - restoration of technical readiness from 2011 at the shipyard "Nerpa".
K-266 "Orel" pr. 949A in average repair from 15.11.2013 to 2016. inclusively at the Zvezdochka CA
B-388 "Petrozavodsk" pr. 671RTMK in technical reserve of the 2nd category since 04.2013, "donor", awaiting write-off.
K-461 "Wolf" pr. 971 in average repair and modernization from 14.08.2014 to 2017. inclusively at the Zvezdochka CA;
K-328 "Leopard" pr. 971 in medium repair and modernization from 29.06.2011 to 2015-16. inclusively at the Zvezdochka CA;
K-154 "Tiger" pr. 971 in the technical reserve of the 2nd category, awaiting medium repair and modernization at the Zvyozdochka CS;
K-157 "Vepr" pr. 971 restoration of technical readiness from 21.08.2012 to 2015. inclusively at the Nerpa shipyard;
K-335 "Gepard" pr. 971 restoration of technical readiness according to the plan until early 2015 at the Nerpa shipyard.
TC-20 "Severstal" pr. 941 - as of 18.03.2015, a decision was made to dispose of;
TC-17 "Arkhangelsk" pr. 941 - as of March 18.03.2015, XNUMX, a decision was made to dispose of;
B-239 "Karp" pr. 945 - mothballed since 1994; On May 14.05.2014, 20.03.2015, a contract was signed for medium repair and modernization at the Zvezdochka CS; On XNUMX, the work was suspended.
K-44 "Ryazan", pr. 667BDR, awaiting mid-term repairs and modernization from 2011 at the Zvezda shipyard.
K-150 "Tomsk" pr. 949A in medium repair until the end of 2014 (according to plan) at the "Zvezda" DVZ;
K-442 "Chelyabinsk" pr. 949A in the technical reserve of the 2nd category since 2008, from 07.09.2014 in medium repair and modernization at the DVZ "Zvezda";
K-295 "Samara" pr. 971 in the technical reserve of the 2nd category at the Belomorsk naval base since 29.09.2014, awaiting medium repair and modernization in 2015-17. (according to plan) at the Zvezdochka CS;
K-319 "Bratsk" pr. 971 in conservation since 2003, medium repair and modernization from 29.09.2014/2017/XNUMX to XNUMX inclusive at the Zvyozdochka CS;
K-419 "Kuzbass" pr. 971 - restoration of technical readiness from August 17.08.2009, 2014 to the end of XNUMX (according to plan) at the Zvezda Far Eastern Plant;
K-331 "Magadan" pr. 971 - restoration of technical readiness from 28.09.2012 at the "Zvezda" DVZ.
K-132 "Irkutsk" pr. 949A pending repair from 11.2001, average repair and modernization from 05.12.2013 to 2017. DVZ "Zvezda";
K-332 "Kashalot" pr. 971 in conservation since 2003 at the Amur Shipyard. There is information about the possible transfer of the Indian Navy.

[silver_roman]

Thank you True, the terms are not small: for 4-5 years, repair and modernization. Although it all depends on the level of repair and modernization. This would be more detailed.
That probably affects the workload of enterprises

[Tigr]

Quote: silver_roman

This would be more detailed.

And for this is an article.

[Gans1234]

Yes, nothing, hands itched for a long time.
I won’t patch up the surface composition of the fleets, although I promised

[jjj]

Photo 21 depicts BDRka, not BDRM

[Gans1234]

Isn't she ??
It seems that the steering depths are on the same level as the contour of the protrusion of the rocket mines.
The BDR has lower rudders

[KakoVedi]

BDR from BDRM is best distinguished by the bow. In the latter, it is "spready" ... As in RTMs. There are differences in the rocket "humps" and in the fencing of the cabin, but they cannot be seen from every angle.

[Argon]

Very interesting photos, especially, "special" ships.

[NEXUS]

especially pleased with the "Titanium" boats ... they did not cut them on needles, they did not write off ... something in repair, something in the ranks ... I read about the project 945B (Mars), which was dismantled on the stocks ... eh, how it was necessary not to love your homeland, so that such ships, on pins and needles

[gispanec]

Quote: NEXUS

especially pleased with the "Titanium" boats ... not cut on needles

before the collapse of the ruble exchange rate there was a DECISION about their (945) modifications with repairs + immediately after the other two (945A) the same thing .... the joy was, but now they say that everything has stalled ... and the boats are in many ways unique in their acoustics communication and shock complex to change and the song)) will be ...

[NEXUS]

Quote: gispanec

and the boats then, in many respects unique to them the acoustics of communication and the shock complex, and change the song)) will be ...

these "eternal boats" are already a song ... to give them everything new, but to arm them, they will serve Russia for another 100 years.

[Dog of war]

"They say it's stalled" has already been denied by the Zvezdochka press center.

[A1L9E4K9S]

How much Russia lost in twenty-four years of troubled times, it was destroyed in an instant, and it will take decades to restore and the glory of God and the people of Russia, which at last came to its senses from the madness imposed by evil friends over the years and began to recover gradually recovering what had been destroyed.

[Barboskin]

And I feel sorry for the Sharks. At the word, recycling scraped as much as a heart.

[gispanec]

Quote: Barboskin

And I feel sorry for Sharks

I agree, but there is no main caliber for them .... missiles were made in Dnepropetrovsk .... it was just expensive to keep it .... on D. Donskoy they were able to re-open one mine under a mace .... they left it ..... True, 2 others could be reprofiled, but apparently the government is sorry for the money .... the decision is made, both will be cut .....

[Bombardier]

For me, why not cut it - maybe it’s better to put up a museum, huh? What do you think?.

[Barboskin]

Quote: Bombardier

For me, why not cut it - maybe it’s better to put up a museum, huh? What do you think?.

Nothing to think, it should be so! Museum is an important thing for the education of new generations.

[Tigr]

Quote: Bombardier

For me, why not cut it - maybe it’s better to put up a museum, huh? What do you think?.

Of course, one "Shark" must certainly be pulled ashore and left as a monument to descendants, writing on board in large red letters: VICTORY OF TECHNOLOGY OVER HEALTH.

[Gans1234]

The museum is yes, but it is better to fulfill my little dream - to remake them during the modernization from strategic submarines to submarines with cruise missiles - to stuff 100 pieces into Shark Kalibrov (or maybe more, the volumes are large for the sub), and there will be an amazing multi-purpose submarine

[Russian_Bear]

Barboskin (1) SU Today, 07: 26 New
And I feel sorry for the Sharks. At the word, recycling scraped as much as a heart.

I agree, the boats were excellent. An engineering miracle. I would like to take a look at their American counterparts. I know they have our Sea Wolf "killer". Many domestic experts also say that the Americans have created a unique boat. I would like to read about her

[Siberia 9444]

Thank you author + without further ado, everything is clear where, when, in what condition and with the photo report

[inkass_98]

Class, thanks for the trouble!

[Stiletto]

Eh, good nuclearbones! It is a pity, however, that many are under repair, but on conservation, but recycling is expected. Well, plus more unfinished ones, they would probably have brought it to mind, but let these fish out into the ocean. They are really needed there!

[Stirbjorn]

How many boats were completed in the early 90s. They were able to build in the USSR, not as now, an atomic submarine per year. According to sharks, it’s not clear a little why they should be disposed of if older squids are still in operation. Really it was impossible to redo, even under the underwater transport for the Arctic bases ...

[501 Legion]

From the article it is clear that almost the entire underwater fleet is under repair.
but for the disposal of Sharks it is extremely and extremely insulting, a formidable weapon that should be in order. I watched a documentary about Severstal and got into this car, and here they are put under the knife not well comrades oh how not good.
wonderful article +

[UzRus]

There is life in the old dog yet! Sharks, of course, feel sorry ...

[holgert]

Thank God, at least something is afloat !!!! You look, and you understand what era of betrayal we went through. The main thing is not to go back to this nightmare !!!

[bolat19640303]

If there are no missiles for "SHARKS", then maybe it would be worth re-equipping them for cruise missiles? This is exactly what the United States did with a part of "OHIO". Is it really cheaper to build a new boat?

[Gans1234]

Entirely FOR such an idea - after the modernization under Caliber, the Sharks ran for another 20 years.

[solohan]

I once read about how in Russia they reproduced the formula of smokeless powder by simply counting cars with raw materials, maybe Pikul is lying, but for analysts of potential enemies, even such photos, taking into account the scale, will say a lot ...

[sub307]

Thank you for photos....

[Vitale]

Cool post !!!

[Lyton]

Very good pictures, about the Sharks correctly noticed, the expression "awaiting disposal" hurts the eye, it becomes sad, indeed at least one museum would be made. And special purpose boats, what exactly are they intended for, I would like to know?

[cobalt]

What a fruitful year 1990 was, it’s a pity that now we cannot build boats and ships at the same time.

[spiolist pas harp]

Many thanks for the article. A wonderful "who-where" photo report about a small part of the submarine fleet.
Me like an american spy , Interested in: What kind of bulb is in the back on pr. 945, 945A and 971? What is he for? In the photo of K-335 it is absent, although it is not written that it is under repair. But the respected Tigr indicated the K-335 in the list of repaired, for which I also thank him
As I understand it, "Ash" is pr.885. In many articles the eyes are dazzled by "885" and "855", although the conversation is only about "Ash". Question: "Was there a boy?" Is there a pr. 855?
And yet (again, an American spy is interested in ), in photo 50 the deep-diving vehicle itself? Or just a carrier? From the publicly available information, I concluded that figs we will see the "Gate" itself in the next 20 years. For - "nEfig"! Is it so?

[Tigr]

Quote: Speciolist on harp

What kind of bulb in the back on ave. 945, 945A and 971? What is he for?

It contains the manufactured low-frequency flexible long antenna designed for passive sonar for significant (several hundred kilometers) distances.

Quote: Speciolist on harp

In the photo of K-335 it is absent, although it is not written that it is under repair. But the respected Tigr indicated the K-335 in the list of repaired, for which I also thank him

K-335 "Cheetah" extreme PLA pr.971, which entered service in 1999 and was built according to an improved design (you can clearly see this by the absence of the bulba you mentioned on the stern plumage). Should be commissioned after renovation this year.

Quote: Speciolist on harp

As I understand it, "Ash" is pr.885. In many articles, the eyes are dazzled by "885" and "855", although the conversation is only about "Ash". Question: "Was there a boy?"

Of course, the project 885 "Ash" exists. So far, the only prototype is the K-560 Severodvinsk. However, 4 more submarines of this type (or rather, the improved one - 885M) are in different stages of construction: K-561 "Kazan", K-573 "Novosibirsk", K-571 "Krasnoyarsk" and K-564 "Arkhangelsk".

Quote: Speciolist on harp

Does pr.855 exist?

IMHO, we are talking about the SSBN pr.955.

[spiolist pas harp]

Tigr, many thanks for the info from an american spy

Quote: Tigr

IMHO, we are talking about the SSBN pr.955.

No ... Even in the article about "Ashes" on warfiles.ru, the designations 885 and 855 are mixed. Google, on request 855, issues the same "venigrets" about "Ashes". It is clear, then Project 855 did not exist.
By 10831 I understood: silence is a sign of consent We will continue to live in "ignorance"

[Tigr]

Quote: Speciolist on harp

By 10831 I understood: silence is a sign of consent

Take it easier: silence is not a sign of consent, but a lack of knowledge (information).

[jurikberlin]

Gorbachev a little ..., but did not almost merge the production of submarines. walked with a dissatisfied mug
on assembly shops and mumbled everything about conversion.
Thank God that in time (albeit with some delay) they managed to stop this madness.

and sharks are a pity. I'm not special, but maybe it’s better to put under conservation? because there are locomotives
in oil just in case.

[KakoVedi]

Photo 21 has nothing to do with Karelia. This is One of the BDRs.

[Tigr]

Quote: KakoVedi

Photo 21 has nothing to do with Karelia. This is One of the BDRs.

This is K-433 "St. George the Victorious" of project 667BDR "Kalmar". In the photo, the missile carrier was captured after a collision with the Donets fishing seiner in the water area of ​​Avacha Bay in 2011: http://periskop.livejournal.com/799331.html

[Gans1234]

Well, if such a special confirmed the mistake - that means the truth is a jamb - can you throw the right photo of the BDRM to replace for the 21 number ???

[Tigr]

Please, dear Gans1234!

SSBN K-18 "Karelia" project 667BDRM "Dolphin":
http://tsushima.su/forums/viewtopic.php?id=4025&p=10

[KakoVedi]

According to the last photo, "Orenburg" ... In the 82nd he was an ordinary "rocket carrier". He became a specialist much later.

[Viktor Afanasev]

Thanks to the author!
We still have a submarine fleet (not separate ships, as in a surface ship, namely the Fleet)
Modernization and repair - it is important!
But why do ASH trees take so long to build ??? In 10 years, how many multipurpose nuclear submarines remain?