Military Review

Ukrainian Foreign Minister sent an appeal to the UN Security Council to enter peacekeepers

52
The head of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine, Pavel Klimkin, said that he had already sent a preliminary appeal to the UN Security Council on the deployment of a peacekeeping force to the east of the country.

Ukrainian Foreign Minister sent an appeal to the UN Security Council to enter peacekeepers


According to him, the decision to enter the peacekeepers was approved by the National Security and Defense Council, and President Petro Poroshenko will make an official appeal to the UN after the adoption of the relevant resolution by deputies of the Verkhovna Rada.

“I have already made a preliminary appeal - as a minister I had this right after the decision of the NSDC. A formal appeal on behalf of Ukraine will be made by the president, "- quotes Klimkin RIA "News".

In addition, the head of the Ukrainian Foreign Ministry noted that the talk about entering the peacekeeping contingent took place during the many hours of negotiations in Minsk, but this was not included in the final document.

“It was discussed. It really wasn’t included in the final document, ”he stressed.
Photos used:
http://ria.ru/
52 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. avvg
    avvg 16 March 2015 06: 46
    +18
    "Ruins" wants with the hands of "a peacekeeping contingent from NATO countries," will pacify Donbass. Russia, as a permanent member of the UN Owls Beza, will not allow, dreaming of "Parasenko" is not harmful.
    1. Revolver
      Revolver 16 March 2015 06: 54
      +14
      Does Piglet know the word "veto"?recourse No. request
      1. Teberii
        Teberii 16 March 2015 07: 00
        +12
        Helmets must be prepared, polite people are needed everywhere.
        1. Alexey Boukin
          Alexey Boukin 16 March 2015 11: 56
          0
          Ukraine wants to lay its problems on the shoulders of peacekeepers. Well, let's see what happens!
          1. comprochikos
            comprochikos 16 March 2015 14: 20
            0
            You can send "peacekeepers", but without helmets, just blue.
      2. Момент
        Момент 16 March 2015 07: 24
        +11
        It’s just that Ukraine wants to legalize American, Polish, and so forth troops. They’re type peacekeepers
      3. Sunjar
        Sunjar 16 March 2015 07: 44
        +13
        I directly read the thoughts of the Ukronazis. So the UN will introduce its peacekeepers, and because of their positions we will hammer at Novorossia, and they, in turn, will cover us and with insolent mugs say that there is no shelling, and the sworn separatists will not be able to pile on us, since the "peacekeepers" will not allow us to be driven into the next "cauldron".

        But oooooooo ... Russia will break everything down again, for it will say yes, let's introduce peacekeepers, but ours too, since you are demanding from us the implementation of the Minsk agreements, although we are not party to the conflict, then our peacekeepers also need to be introduced. The Ukronazists and the UN will immediately protest and that’s the end of the matter. The tale is over.
        1. ArhipenkoAndrey
          ArhipenkoAndrey 16 March 2015 09: 52
          +3
          The Russians have already tried to break off the same way, in Yugoslavia, and where our peacekeepers ended up and where Yugoslavia is, this is a tried and tested technique for breaking off territory from the country, and in this case, the subjugation and destruction of the Southeast, in the literal sense.
          1. RUSIVAN
            RUSIVAN 16 March 2015 10: 50
            +2
            He remembered too, then Russia did not have the strength to oppose NATO.
    2. Trailer
      Trailer 16 March 2015 06: 55
      +5
      He sent to the UN Security Council a request to Russia to bring peacekeepers against Russia. Maybe a ride!
      1. Viktor Kudinov
        Viktor Kudinov 16 March 2015 06: 58
        +4
        And the contingent of peacekeepers is not from China !? Ah! wassat
        1. Egen
          Egen 16 March 2015 10: 56
          +1
          Why only to the East and to all of Ukraine?
          Quote: Victor Kudinov
          And the contingent of peacekeepers is not from China !? Ah! wassat

          The Chinese would be an ideal neutral option ... a few millionaires commercials ... :)
      2. Egoza
        Egoza 16 March 2015 07: 21
        +5
        Quote: Karavan
        He sent to the UN Security Council a request to Russia to bring peacekeepers against Russia.

        That's it! The deputies and Petya specifically stipulate that there should be no Russians among the peacekeepers. "Let the rest make peace!"
    3. Skif83
      Skif83 16 March 2015 07: 12
      +10
      Obviously, the Yugoslav version is being played out.
      Elzin then surrendered to the Serbs, despite the assault rush.
      We will look at what Comrade will tell us. Putin ?!
      In my opinion, I apologize for recognizing the DPR and LPR as independent states.
      Regarding South Ossetia and Abkhazia, they also spoke out and shut up, and again our "partners" were "friends".
      And here the question is of principle, either we will protect the Russians, wherever they are, or we will let our sworn "friends" understand that not all Russians are our own! This is fraught!
      1. SALLAK
        SALLAK 16 March 2015 08: 34
        +2
        Abkhazia and Ossetia are on the heels of pockets and the size is quite modest, and the people there are generally unpredictable ... And then consider Europe, it will be a big booze, otherwise they would have recognized ...
    4. venzim
      venzim 16 March 2015 07: 16
      +4
      The logic is obvious, peacekeepers are standing, supposedly from the militia side an attack has gone, and NATO countries are legally entering Ukraine.
      Most likely a message from Saakashvili, an attack on our peacekeepers in 2008. caused a violent reaction, which ended in Tbilisi
    5. Finches
      Finches 16 March 2015 07: 34
      +9
      The thing is that there are no professionals in the leadership of Ukraine! There is a swindler-swindler - the president, simply ambitious - d-ak primier, sick in the head, a swindler with a capital letter - the head of the NSDC, some Varangians with a murky past - various ministers, an exceptional id ... from a vacuum - the minister of defense, a leaky clown - the murderer is the Minister of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, some kind of half-criminals and the gravest village in the Rada ..., no less flawed Klimkin ..., but they perfectly understand that they cannot do anything, but they need to do something, so the peacekeepers are from the opera: "Master , we spin as we can, just don't leave us! "
      1. kodxnumx
        kodxnumx 16 March 2015 07: 47
        +1
        It’s better that the head of the Ukrainian Foreign Ministry goes to shoot himself, soon Russian peacekeepers will patrol pebbles at the border and shoot banderlogs like plague hares in the woods!
        1. sannych
          sannych 16 March 2015 09: 14
          +1
          Foreign Minister Ruins is generally an "extremely interesting" person. He thinks that under the cover of "peacekeepers" (preferably from the EU and the US), it will be possible to continue to destroy Novorossia?
          1. Throw
            Throw 16 March 2015 14: 39
            0
            The whole world should think what it can do for Ukraine

            Again, the whole world has something to them .. Think and do for xoxlov, and they will eat vodka and ride on the Maidans for "living more beautifully usih". Parasites ...
        2. evgmiz
          evgmiz 16 March 2015 11: 13
          0
          An ardent follower of Vlasov, and suddenly he will shoot? .. Give him to the people of his native Kursk region, and let him decide what to do with this traitor!
      2. SALLAK
        SALLAK 16 March 2015 08: 38
        +4
        Do not underestimate the enemy, they had a script that they could not fully play out, now there is an improvisation. The CIA simply does not have time to refine the details; everything is changing too quickly, but the war has not yet been won far. For the United States, to lose here is to permanently lose face and weight.
    6. The comment was deleted.
    7. theadenter
      theadenter 16 March 2015 08: 27
      +3
      If there will be no Russian peacekeepers in the peacekeeping contingent, there is nothing even to discuss its entry. After all, this does not meet the interests of all parties to the conflict.
    8. SALLAK
      SALLAK 16 March 2015 08: 29
      +2
      Russia will not veto ... otherwise it will be accused of unwillingness to end the armed conflict. After all, everything is superficially white and fluffy. What is possible in this situation is to insist on a contingent from countries loyal to Russia ...
      1. GRAY
        GRAY 16 March 2015 08: 50
        +2
        Quote: SALLAK
        What is possible in this situation is to insist on a contingent from countries loyal to Russia ...

        The bourgeois will never go for it; the question will definitely hang in the air. You don’t even have to veto.
    9. dobrjak
      dobrjak 16 March 2015 08: 48
      +1
      But is the OSCE missing? Let them dream. This is not harmful.
    10. The comment was deleted.
    11. Giant thought
      Giant thought 16 March 2015 09: 02
      +2
      Empty chores are for Ukraine.
    12. The comment was deleted.
    13. Maks111
      Maks111 16 March 2015 14: 08
      0
      Damn, but look, literate move. If Russia blocks and vetoes, then they will raise a howl that the bloodthirsty Russians are killing Ukrainians and do not want peace. And if we support, then on the border with the Belgorod region we will get NATO bases, because you don’t think that the peacekeepers will be from Russia)) They will most likely be from the NATO bloc. Is it not for this input of the NATO peacekeepers that all this was planned in the Donbass? Fork gentlemen sad
  2. Alexander Romanov
    Alexander Romanov 16 March 2015 06: 48
    +3
    Not just asking, maybe we can introduce their own.
    1. Revolver
      Revolver 16 March 2015 06: 58
      +2
      Quote: Alexander Romanov
      Not just asking, maybe we can introduce their own.

      Do not give Obama a reason to raise the stench. And the militia will deal with dill without peacekeepers. It wouldn’t be bad to fit the militia’s thread of shooting snacks, and let them prove that this wasn’t from the Ukrainian army stores.
      1. SveTok
        SveTok 16 March 2015 12: 06
        0
        They jumped, were left without money, without draftees, they would soon turn to the UN for humanitarian aid for Kiev.
  3. Mikhail m
    Mikhail m 16 March 2015 06: 50
    +2
    The veto is still valid.
  4. Imperialkolorad
    Imperialkolorad 16 March 2015 06: 52
    +3
    As Serdyuchka used to say to one masochist: "I cannot refuse when they ask me for a long time."
  5. Loner_53
    Loner_53 16 March 2015 06: 52
    +1
    “This was discussed. It really was not included in the final document, "

    We’ll guess on coffee grounds or on daisies, it wasn’t discussed, he forgot that someone might veto it. They’ve already shaken half the world of kakly am
  6. Lyton
    Lyton 16 March 2015 06: 52
    0
    Quote: Alexander Romanov
    Not just asking, maybe we can introduce their own.

    It’s possible to the east, where our people live, otherwise I feel that these orcs will not calm down.
  7. b.t.a.
    b.t.a. 16 March 2015 06: 55
    +2
    What's the use? Peacekeepers were also brought into Serbia, and the Albanians took advantage of this. And in the end, Kosovo was taken away under the guise. Already the militiamen would have finished the banderlogs and the case was over.
  8. Ursidae
    Ursidae 16 March 2015 06: 56
    +2
    In principle, they came up correctly. Or who suggested ...
    Peacekeepers are brought into the line of contact, thereby releasing their troops. In the light of the promised demobilization and the high cost of maintaining troops - it is very reasonable. They will shift the expenses to the UN in the main areas, thereby they can concentrate on others and force.
    They have good advisers, you won’t be denied this.
    1. Viktor Kudinov
      Viktor Kudinov 16 March 2015 07: 03
      +1
      Peacekeepers sometimes need to be pacified themselves. Recently, in Africa, peacekeepers sometimes begin to fight on the sides they like. Where is the guarantee that there will be no such thing !!? what
  9. Drmadfisher
    Drmadfisher 16 March 2015 06: 59
    +2
    just watched the film "Crimea. The Way to the Homeland". Many thanks to the authors hi
  10. Rurikovich
    Rurikovich 16 March 2015 07: 04
    +6
    What peacekeepers !? For the introduction of peacekeepers, official recognition of war is necessary. If there is official recognition, then questions arise to the IMF. And if the IMF gives money to a country officially in a state of war, then this is open sponsorship of the war. Then the founders of the IMF should be raised and raise the question of whether this organization meets its charter ...
    1. Gardener91
      Gardener91 16 March 2015 07: 17
      +1
      War can be formulated as armed conflict. A play on words, but the meaning is different.
  11. Gardener91
    Gardener91 16 March 2015 07: 06
    +1
    To begin with, they at the UN must deprive the Russian Federation of veto power, otherwise the peacekeepers will be ours, if such a decision is made. Tyagnibok recently crucified about depriving the Russian Federation of veto power at the UN. We wanted to play ahead of the curve. Not a ride.
  12. wolf1968
    wolf1968 16 March 2015 07: 07
    0
    The peacekeepers gathered to defend themselves from their scumbags!
  13. cergey51046
    cergey51046 16 March 2015 07: 11
    0
    Well, stupid. Russia at the UN has the right to veto.
  14. bmv04636
    bmv04636 16 March 2015 07: 13
    +2
    Well, as I understand it, they recognize that in Ukraine it’s not a ATO, but a civil war
  15. jPilot
    jPilot 16 March 2015 07: 15
    0
    Well, what a nature, do not wash so by rolling, but be sure to try to "deceive" and "outwit" everyone. angry Where did "these" have such confidence that they are the smartest and most cunning. request belay
  16. Tima
    Tima 16 March 2015 07: 23
    0
    Kakly so actively destroy thousands of Russian paratroopers !!! Why do they need peacekeepers? And do they dig a ditch at the border so that these paratroopers do not run back to Russia?
    They don’t hear themselves!
  17. andrei332809
    andrei332809 16 March 2015 07: 31
    0
    without Russians, nobody will climb there; they shoot request
  18. Tankograd
    Tankograd 16 March 2015 07: 45
    +2
    I'm going to paint the helmet in blue. Who will tell you, the coat of arms of Russia on the helmet from which side to draw? soldier
    1. Gardener91
      Gardener91 16 March 2015 08: 12
      +1
      Not a coat of arms, but a blue circle with inscribed yellow letters MC.
  19. valokordin
    valokordin 16 March 2015 07: 51
    0
    In principle, peacekeepers can be introduced, for example, from China. If Putin does not agree, he will be accused of unwillingness to peace in Ukraine. But peacekeepers should be introduced after the complete liberation of the Lugansk and Donetsk regions from ukronatsistov. Klimkin can be called the Kursk Ribentrop.
  20. boa constrictor
    boa constrictor 16 March 2015 07: 53
    0
    What they want is what they do !! Peace Creators, from the derivative - World Creatures, it seems like a yokelamene !! Petroshenko and others like him (spratoto Armada for example or PshekoStaya) - really from this pack !! yes
  21. Zomanus
    Zomanus 16 March 2015 08: 03
    0
    Peacekeepers in this case are not interesting for the West. For this will lead to a calming of the conflict. And the West needs the destruction of the ruins. So there will be no peacekeepers. There will be only loans and the OSCE.
  22. strelez
    strelez 16 March 2015 08: 03
    0
    laughing quite this dill rabble fucked lol already afraid of their own people .... protection for these bandits and fascists was needed ..... and what is there to protect ???? wassat
  23. Pomah
    Pomah 16 March 2015 08: 24
    +1
    Their brains completely flew from the coils - such nonsense has recently been carried that at the time to talk about preparing the FULL end.
  24. Stinger
    Stinger 16 March 2015 08: 29
    0
    Why peacekeepers. It is enough to bring a set of muzzles and straitjackets to Kiev.
  25. takeoff
    takeoff 16 March 2015 08: 33
    0
    The head of the Ukrainian Foreign Ministry noted that talks about the deployment of the peacekeeping contingent were conducted during the many hours of negotiations in Minsk, but this did not fall into the final document.

    None of the leaders even made a single attempt to talk about such "conversations". Apparently, Mr. Klimkin believes that according to the top officials of the states, the price is one hryvnia. But he knows that !!!
  26. haustyn
    haustyn 16 March 2015 08: 57
    0
    So what happens in dill, a war with Russia or an anti TERRORIST operation? If the latter are some peacekeepers in the fight against terrorism? belay
  27. bmv04636
    bmv04636 16 March 2015 09: 41
    0
    What shall we do with Sudan? Peacekeepers only helped in this
    1. Prager
      Prager 16 March 2015 12: 32
      0
      absolutely right. if peacekeepers are introduced, it will be the same in the Donbass.
  28. Victor-M
    Victor-M 16 March 2015 09: 48
    0
    The head of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine, Pavel Klimkin, said that he had already sent a preliminary appeal to the UN Security Council on the deployment of a peacekeeping force to the east of the country.

    It’s all the same that Chikatilo will send a request to law enforcement agencies to provide him with protection in order to ensure his safety from relatives of the brutally tortured victims.
  29. Thompson
    Thompson 16 March 2015 13: 08
    0
    Quote: Nagan
    Does Piglet know the word "veto"?recourse No. request

    Let's not flatter ourselves! Once the states have already bypassed the UN! They can here too! And here a lot depends on the leadership of Russia - whether they will give them a reason for such an action or show that they do not need to disturb the Russian bear!
  30. Gunxnumx
    Gunxnumx 16 March 2015 13: 11
    0
    Deja vu. If I am not mistaken, the Americans participated in the Korean War as "peacekeepers."
  31. Curbstone xnumx
    Curbstone xnumx 16 March 2015 14: 53
    0
    It is unambiguously necessary to insist on bringing in Russian peacekeepers together with Western ones. Moreover, on an equal footing. And then the "piglet" will quickly lose the desire to send peacekeepers to Donbass. Any other options for entering peacekeepers, veto.
  32. Eltempo23rus
    Eltempo23rus 16 March 2015 16: 46
    0
    The knots worthless crap themselves, the strength was not enough, now they whine mongrel and ask for help.