Military Review

Rosoboronexport returned $ 167 million to Iran for disrupting C-300 supplies

20
Rosoboronexport returned $ 167 million to Iran for disrupting C-300 supplies

Rosoboronexport returned $ 167 million to Tehran for disrupting the supply of C-300 anti-aircraft missile systems. This was stated by the head of Rosoboronexport, Anatoly Isaykin, writes Kommersant.


“Not such a large amount. But, nevertheless, this is a loss,” he noted.

"The financial loss was expressed in the return of the advance. This requirement is made at the conclusion of any contract with any country. That is, the contracting country, in this case Iran, sends an advance to Russia to those enterprises that manufacture military goods, and this advance serves for to start the production of this type of product ", - said Isaikin.

“But we give, in particular, Rosoboronexport, a guarantee of the return of the advance in the case of such unforeseen contractual circumstances. This means force majeure circumstances, such as the sanction of the UN Security Council. That's what happened. Therefore, we are obliged to return this amount And we returned it, "said the head of Rosoboronexport.

"All other losses are only hypothetical - the so-called loss of profits. This is, as is the case with Libya, contracts concluded, but not entered into force. That is, we have not received a penny from Libya, and therefore the production of these contracts has not yet begun “And the loss can only be considered as a lost profit, that is, we could receive this money, but we did not receive it,” said Isaikin.

The contract for the supply of Russia to Iran C-300 was signed in December 2005. However, last September, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev canceled the deal, explaining that the new package of UN Security Council sanctions makes the contract with the Islamic Republic impracticable. After that, Iran has repeatedly demanded that Russia fulfill "commitments on the supply of C-300".
Originator:
http://www.rosbalt.ru
20 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Banshee
    Banshee 23 September 2011 12: 53 New
    +2
    Oh shit!
    And even the court did not wait, immediately legs in front of the owners raised up ...
    But what is it going to happen, well, where are we so nakosyachili, do all of Nicholas the second pay off with such slegging in power?
    1. Vadivak
      Vadivak 23 September 2011 14: 29 New
      +1
      Business is business, either or (or Bushehr or S-300)
    2. Professor
      Professor 23 September 2011 17: 56 New
      -2
      What owners are in front of? There is a UN Security Council resolution prohibiting selling!
      1. Sanzyro
        Sanzyro 23 September 2011 19: 47 New
        +1
        Let's not talk about the UN ... It’s clear to everyone who this organization belongs to, and it has completely discredited itself!
      2. Vadivak
        Vadivak 23 September 2011 19: 59 New
        +1
        Professor at the UN Security Council, better not, he approved the creation of a no-fly zone over Libya and how did it end? Spielberg interprets Chekhov in his own way; Viktyuk in his own way, in general, you understand, in general, 100% agree with Sanzyro
      3. Yukon
        Yukon 23 September 2011 23: 18 New
        +1
        If Russia wanted to, it could veto this resolution
        1. Professor
          Professor 24 September 2011 09: 32 New
          -2
          If Russia wanted to, it could veto this resolution

          100%.
          But since there is already a resolution, it must be respected - we do not live in a gang.

          PS
          The USSR is gone and never will be. Enough about this smear the snot on the cheeks.
          1. PSih2097
            PSih2097 24 September 2011 22: 15 New
            -2
            The USSR is gone and never will be. Enough about this smear the snot on the cheeks.

            Another Nostradamus?
  2. DEfindER
    DEfindER 23 September 2011 13: 06 New
    0
    I don’t understand what right our Hyperliberal Pres. to break this agreement, is he an enemy to himself, and the people too ?!
  3. LESHA pancake
    LESHA pancake 23 September 2011 14: 14 New
    0
    OUR GOVERNMENT IS COMPLETED IN A FULL PROGRAM.
  4. svvaulsh
    svvaulsh 23 September 2011 15: 51 New
    0
    Another "KU" of our "beloved" leadership to American friends.
    1. Bogatir
      Bogatir 23 September 2011 17: 32 New
      0
      Write in the plural ...
  5. sancho
    sancho 23 September 2011 17: 36 New
    0
    Yes, our geopolitics is booming! Yes Our Hobbits, Yes EDRosa shit .. s!
  6. AleksUkr
    AleksUkr 23 September 2011 17: 49 New
    +1
    Interestingly, is this net debt, or with interest? And the lost profit for our figures is clearly expressed only in money. And politically, our country is becoming an unscrupulous partner in almost all matters
  7. Pole
    Pole 23 September 2011 19: 04 New
    +1
    Maybe I'm wrong, tell me, if so ... The UN resolution concerns only offensive weapons, and the negotiated C-300 PMU1 are exclusively defensive air defense systems ....
    What is the cant then ??? Really really sold out ??? Or have changed for something ???
  8. Sanzyro
    Sanzyro 23 September 2011 19: 44 New
    +1
    Deflection fixed!
  9. Matroskin
    Matroskin 23 September 2011 19: 56 New
    +1
    Bitch Selling angry
  10. kosmos84
    kosmos84 23 September 2011 20: 51 New
    0
    FOR LONG TIME WE WILL DELIVER ALLIES CHANGING THEM FOR $
  11. Ivan Tarasov
    Ivan Tarasov 23 September 2011 20: 54 New
    +3
    All this money will be reimbursed from our pocket.
    But it's not just about the money.
    Iran is a geopolitical ally of the Russian Federation.
    By weakening an ally, we weaken ourselves.
  12. Marat
    Marat 23 September 2011 23: 56 New
    +1
    Under pressure, Pendosov left the friendly neighboring country unarmed in the face of the threat of real aggression. So you can go too far - today they demand to give Iran back - and what if tomorrow it is forbidden to supply weapons to one of the CIS republics and begin a "peacekeeping action" there?

    I apologize for repeating the same idea - but the USSR would not allow this. We must unite in something similar to the Union - so that pendos could not crush and threaten - after all, from the very beginning, Russia had the intention to deliver from 300 to Iran!
  13. Che
    Che 3 February 2012 08: 22 New
    0
    Spit on pindosnya, the contract must be fulfilled, and not lick.