On the "imperial burden" of Russia

51

There is a black myth, or rather a negative program that “all empires collapsed” They say the USSR was the Red Empire and therefore died, in turn its largest fragment was the Russian Federation. This statement is not true.

Empires do not disappear completely, as long as there is a people carrier of the "imperial program." So, China has experienced more than one fall of its empires, but it has always been reborn, and now we see a new revival of the Middle Kingdom. In recent years, signs of a resurgence of two more empires can be noted - the Iranian and Ottoman. Empires like historical the phenomenon does not arise by chance or certain political factors, but because of the existence in the world space of regions for which the form of an empire (great power) is the most optimal option. In addition, the empire is based on one great people - Russians, Chinese (Han), Persians, English, Germans, etc. The collapse of one empire formed in this space is only a prologue to the formation of another great power. This process can only be stopped in one way - to destroy the "imperial people." In the new empire, there may be another elite, power institutions, ideology. But it will continue to unite territory economically and historically gravitating towards unity.

So, in the same Europe, we can note the successive change of empires that tried to unite the entire peninsula: Roman Empire - the Empire of Charlemagne - "Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation" - Napoleon’s French Empire - Third Reich - European Union, in which due to the global crisis the German nucleus, paralyzed by the defeat of 1945, sharply intensified. Germany already at the economic, financial priority dictates its will to European countries. As the crisis develops, the political pressure of Berlin will only increase.

It should be noted that in Europe there is a noticeable thirst for merging with the Mediterranean region. This fact has been noted since the times of ancient Greece, the empire of Alexander the Great, then Rome and its eastern part, Byzantium. Currently, North Africa is in the zone of influence of Spain, France, Italy.

Russians need to understand that “empire” is not a swear word, but a feature of our historical development. We must take the "burden of the empire" and bear it, or our people are doomed to gradual destruction. Our territories will be occupied, absorbed by neighboring geopolitical players - the West, Turkey, China, Japan. This is our code, the program, we execute it or die, it is not given otherwise. Those who dream of a cozy “Russian Holland,” let them go there and continue to radiate empty and harmful illusions.

What is the difference between an empire and an ordinary state? She has several distinctive features: the presence of her big Idea, a political project; strong centralized power; a large territory and its sphere of influence on the planet; the desire for expansion (military, economic, demographic, political, cultural); the presence of the "imperial people" - the core of the empire. Some empires have a global project, the desire for full supremacy on the planet. The need to become the "king of the mountain." Currently leading Western project. In principle, this process, globalization is logical. The unification of the planet will happen sooner or later.

But globalization can go two ways. The first is an empire, where expansion is parasitic in nature, the elite want to ensure the existence of the metropolis at the expense of the provinces-colonies. The second is an empire, where expansion has the character of the approval of such a world project, which enables small nations not to be victims of the “global vampire”, but to preserve their identity, to become junior partners in building a new equitable world order.

The West has always been an empire of the first type, the expansion went at the expense of the resources of the murdered victim. That is why modern Europe and the Americas can be called "cemeteries of nations." Apparently, it is not for nothing that films with vampire themes are so popular in the West. The essence of the West, if in one word - it is a ghoul, bloodsucker.

Russia-Russian civilization has always been formed, as the empire of the second type. Even the name “Russian” extended to all who accepted the Russian way, Russian culture and Russian. For Russians, all small nations were “people”, and not human material, people of second, third grade. Over the 20 century we suffered two defeats - the collapse of the Romanov empire and the Red Empire. The main cause of death - the degeneration of the elite, managerial class. It was not possible to create a stable subculture of reproduction of a patriotic, people-oriented elite.

Now the Russian people have been deprived (at the level of politics, ideology) of its imperial nature, but since this is its program code, the Russian Federation is doomed to the restoration of the empire - the world needs a Russian globalization project. A lot has already been said about another variant, it is a further degradation and death of our people. Therefore, the ideas of Dmitry Medvedev and K., like the national democrats speaking of the “Russian national state”, are a mistake or a deliberate sabotage. To deprive the Russian people of this imperial beginning means to deprive the foundation that builds their self-consciousness, this program can be eliminated only with the last Russian Man.

Having deprived the Russian people of this basis, they want to turn us into biomass, which lives only with animal joys.
51 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +11
    19 September 2011 08: 57
    globalization can go two ways. The first is the empire, where expansion is parasitic in nature, the elite wants to ensure the existence of the mother country at the expense of the provinces-colonies. The second is an empire, where expansion has the character of approving such a world project that enables small nations to be not victims of the “global vampire”, but to maintain their identity, become junior partners in building a new fair world order.
    The West has always been an empire of the first type, expansion went at the expense of the resources of the killed victim. That is why modern Europe and the American continents can be called "cemeteries of peoples." Apparently, it is not in vain that films with vampire themes are so popular in the West. The essence of the West, if in a word is blood ghoul.

    Very rightly noted ...
    1. +4
      19 September 2011 09: 54
      Interesting article, thanks to the author, I do not want to be biomass
    2. Ivan35
      +1
      19 September 2011 18: 21
      This time, Samsonov avoided all sorts of stupid things - I agree with the main idea

      1. The Russian empire differs from the "western" ones because it is not "vampiric!" - everything is correct - all peoples joined as equal - and the Georgians Bagration and Kazakhs, General Momysh Uly and Chokan Valikhanov were patriots and heroes of Great Russia - perhaps even more Russian than some current "nationalists"

      2. If the Russians forget their "imperial" essence, then they will not be able to sit out in a small democratic Russia - geography, climate and geopolitics doom Russians or be strong and great - to be an empire! - or perish as a people under the thumb of the "behind-the-scenes world government"

      Every Russian should strive for the revival of the Great Empire - which is not afraid of either the Pendos, the Chinese or the "world masons"
      1. Marat
        +2
        20 September 2011 23: 07
        A good article is right! Or we will all be together and strong - or we will be defeated one by one!
        And the only people who can unite others are Russians, if only because they are the most numerous in Eurasia
        Therefore, the enemy strikes first of all at the Russians - Russian culture and Russian history - they will not be - then it will not be difficult to "sort out" with us all
        1. +2
          21 September 2011 04: 45
          Quote: Marat
          A good article is the right one! Either we will all be together and strong - or we will be defeated one by one! And the only people who can unite others are the Russians - if only because there are more of them in Eurasia Therefore, the enemy hits first of all on Russians - on Russian culture and Russian history - they will not be - then it will not be difficult to "sort out" all of us


          I support, like Russian! wink Marat, you are some kind of direct amazing Kazakh / Kipchak! smile Do many Kazakhs also think in Kazakhstan itself?
          1. Marat
            +2
            21 September 2011 08: 14
            Thanks for the compliment, I will answer the question
            1. According to my feelings - by occupation I communicate a lot - probably more than half of Kazakhs share patriotic views regarding the Union of Belarus, Russia and Kazakhstan. The percentage is higher in the north and west. There is more cultural dependence - good or bad - but many of us are "Russified" - bicultural. - fortunately, our leadership in most

            2. But even those Kazakhs who do not feel much patriotism with regard to Russia - are unanimous on the issue of an alliance with Russia because of security - the threat of China and threats from the south question the future of Kazakhstan in the future - this is already clear to everyone. For this group (smaller in number), an additional factor is the residence in Russia of related peoples (Tatars, Bashkirs, Altai peoples, etc.)

            To take an anti-Russian position for the Kazakhs is both stupid and criminal in relation to themselves.

            There is, of course, an insignificant handful of "nationalists" - - now they are almost invisible - by the way, in Russia there are "their brothers" - Russian nationalists - working in the same direction. Of course, there are problems of the "reverse pendulum" in the language issue - here on the site we also discussed this - many Kazakhs have forgotten their native language and the government is trying to revive it - there may be excesses somewhere - but nothing critical is happening yet
            1. Marat
              +2
              21 September 2011 08: 45
              And Beil88, in general, I'm not alone here - there are Kazakhs who come and support - and here I am on duty from all of us smile
              1. +2
                21 September 2011 13: 21
                Quote: Marat
                There is, of course, an insignificant handful of "nationalists" - - now they are almost invisible - by the way, in Russia there are "their brothers" - Russian nationalists - working in the same direction. Of course, there are problems of the "reverse pendulum" in the language issue - here on the site we also discussed this - many Kazakhs have forgotten their native language and the government is trying to revive it - there may be excesses somewhere - but nothing critical is happening yet


                Yes, we have enough nationalists. All different. There are those who, in all seriousness, consider Hitler a "liberator". But even despite the manifestations of everyday racism, the idea of ​​a Great Empire is still closer to us, Russians. Personally, it seems to me that it is gaining popularity every year.

                My name is Yura laughing So you have a whole Kazakh combat post? :) Say hello to the guys!
  2. nickname bj
    +5
    19 September 2011 10: 10
    The disadvantage of democratic governance lies in the fact that the ruling elite has no vital interest in passing on a strong "fiefdom" to its direct heirs. Cosmopolitanism prevails.
  3. +4
    19 September 2011 10: 39
    "... this is a mistake or deliberate sabotage." That’s something I don’t believe in a mistake after everything that the Russian rulers have done in 20 years.
  4. +7
    19 September 2011 11: 28
    The article is interesting and truthful, now it is necessary to get people off their knees, get up while there are still people who are carrying some kind of culture, otherwise soon there will be redneck youth with brainwashed brainworms ... There was a military action yesterday, unfortunately I didn’t get it because learned late about it, but this is already one of the main bells, showing that the PEOPLE and the ARMY are ready to stand up against the GHOLES of the West who are in our leading posts .... and in the president’s chair too ... look what they did ... the education system has almost been destroyed, children are becoming ... an institution of family and marriage, forcibly vaccinates girls aged 14-16 !!! that would not multiply ... and this is only the beginning of the list .... where is our agriculture? where is the medicine? I hope you don’t know about the army by hearsay ... where are our combat veterans and Heroes of Russia now ??? how much can you drink the blood of the Russian people? when we say PLEASANTLY and Proudly Having straightened the SHOULDERS, SAY WITH PRIDE, I AM RUSSIAN AND I AM Proud OF IT !!!!
    1. +1
      21 September 2011 08: 58
      Yes, and now I'm proud of it.
      And bydomolodezh already blooming. This is beneficial to the state, but fortunately, there are still those who carry out normal work to restore the brains of young people.
      Here about forced vaccination did not hear.
      1. 0
        21 September 2011 09: 45
        vaccination is carried out under the pretext of preventing cervical cancer ... based on my knowledge of human biology and physiology ... it is impossible to treat and vaccinate cancer, and the vaccine makes rejection of the fetus in the late stages of pregnancy, which causes mental trauma and can lead to physical infertility .. .. even if this did not happen, fear is born ... which keeps the girls from being pregnant again.
    2. 0
      21 September 2011 09: 00
      Yes, and now I'm proud of it.
      And bydomolodezh already blooming. This is beneficial to the state, but fortunately, there are still those who carry out normal work to restore the brains of young people.
      Here about forced vaccination did not hear.
  5. Max
    Max
    -8
    19 September 2011 12: 01
    * Now the Russian people have been deprived (at the level of politics, ideology) of their imperial essence *

    Laughing)))) Ask at any world resort about the behavior of Russian. Well, they spit on everyone and look down on ... The imperial essence remains, but there is no empire at all ....
    1. +7
      19 September 2011 14: 05
      The imperial essence remained, that's just the empire and there is no mention ....

      As they said in Rome, the Empire and Rome will exist as long as at least one legionary has survived ... something like that.
    2. Tyumen
      +2
      19 September 2011 18: 41
      You have a primitive concept of empire. The modern cattle spit on everyone, and Soviet people thought about leaving a good impression of themselves abroad. This is imperial essence.
      1. LESHA pancake
        +1
        19 September 2011 18: 44
        FOR DEMOCRATES ALL WHO WERE BORN IN THE USSR.
      2. Tyumen
        -1
        19 September 2011 19: 07
        I wrote this to Max.
    3. Alf
      0
      15 June 2012 00: 01
      In these resorts there are no RUSSIANS, there is trash that speaks Russian, but they are not Russian people.
  6. +5
    19 September 2011 12: 57
    having your big Idea

    That’s what’s in the first place. But you haven’t come up with this yet. And this is very bad.
    1. Volkhov
      +1
      19 September 2011 13: 33
      Freedom and justice, access to knowledge. As always. You just need to learn a lot and yourself, but now even the basics are distorted.
      1. +3
        19 September 2011 19: 37
        Well, these are words from a crappy west.
        The poem used to be popular:
        "We spoke in the days of Batu
        And in the fields of Borodin:
        "May Russia be exalted!
        May our names disappear! "
        Lenin was right: "An idea only becomes a material force when it takes over the masses!" And abstract freedom, justice, access to knowledge are for the individual, but for the masses, the idea should be significant and global, capable of captivating an intellectual with 3 diplomas, including some Cambridge, and a guy with 8 grades!
        By the way, in the 18th - 20th centuries Russia became an empire without universal secondary education, "for the idea", although the role of education is enormous, it was not for nothing that Stalin introduced universal in order to build his empire. But the filthy role of the elite, who does not care for the state, is an inhibiting factor.
  7. karnics
    0
    19 September 2011 13: 01
    It is necessary to understand that the term Russian is an adjective belonging to the nation of Rus, and the Rus are both Russians and Belarusians and Ukrainians, the "elite" divided us to make it easier to rule us ...
  8. Andrey2302
    0
    19 September 2011 14: 06
    The first time I read that at the resorts, the Russians look at everyone from high and spit. "Maybe you confused the Russians with the Germans, the Americans? I personally saw the" Burger Men "throw tips like dogs. And the Turks, Egyptians run in front of them like dogs Russia had a period when we were without "Belarusians and Little Russia" And there was nothing and the Empire was expanding. And now we need to do the same. To gain strength and return our "Brothers" to the bosom of the Motherland. voluntarily.
    1. 0
      19 September 2011 19: 42
      but selectively! Enough, in 1939 the "brotherly western Ukraine" was annexed and got a nest of Bandera trash, which has a vile influence on politics and Kiev. Well, if they someday want to be a part of Russia, then admission only by the method of developing Siberia, so that no more than 1 Bandera (ki) per 100 sq. Km., Then they will dissolve in the Russian population (I include both the Yakuts and the Chukchi, etc.) and will not stink
      1. 0
        21 September 2011 09: 01
        Oh ... Yakuts and Chukchi for what you are? Than they have done something wrong, they already have a difficult life, and you also propose to send something like that ...
    2. Gosta
      0
      21 September 2011 01: 29
      Yes, you look please
      http://rutube.ru/tracks/596273.html?v=354f8ab129f78663c8c4e85057ab89ec
      http://prikolnoe-video.ru/publ/ugarnye_videoroliki/kak_vedut_sebja_russkie_turis
      ty_za_granicej_na_otdykhe / 20-1-0-150
      RUSSIAN CATTLE
      1. walter_rus
        0
        15 June 2012 00: 59
        Those who are shown in that video like to call decent people "cattle", thinking that this definition refers to the amount of "bubble". Although in reality a sign of "cattle" is arrogance, disrespect for others, boorish behavior.
  9. 0
    19 September 2011 14: 43
    I agree with the author of the article on all points. Except one -
    Therefore, the ideas of Dmitry Medvedev and K., as well as national democrats talking about the “Russian national state”, are a mistake or a deliberate sabotage
  10. 0
    19 September 2011 14: 46
    I agree with the author of the article on all points. Except one -
    Therefore, the ideas of Dmitry Medvedev and K., as well as national democrats talking about the “Russian national state”, are a mistake or a deliberate sabotage

    This is a temporary state of Russia, necessary to restore the very "core" of the empire. You have to take strength somewhere. Therefore, the Russians will have to think more about themselves for a while, and not about expansion.
  11. huraken
    -14
    19 September 2011 16: 32
    "There is a black myth, or rather a negative program that" all empires fell apart "Like, the USSR was the Red Empire and therefore died, next in line is its largest fragment - the Russian Federation. This statement is not true."

    The Russian empire collapsed, the USSR collapsed, and the RF-federation, that is, the commonwealth of legally equal states. While the federation lives, since at least legally the reputation is observed. As soon as they imagine themselves to be an "empire", then kirdyk will come.

    "Empires do not disappear completely as long as there are people who carry the" imperial program "


    Empires do not disappear? Mongolian for example? Macedonian, Incas, and still others.


    "Our territories will be occupied, absorbed by neighboring geopolitical players - the West, Turkey, China, Japan. This is our code, a program, we execute it or die, nothing else is given."


    Why do you think that living in the occupied territories will be bad? I suspect that on the contrary. The Russian empires have always been very poorly managed and life in them has always been unsweetened, the people fled to Lithuania, Poland, Siberia, Persia. Of course, if you think of the realities of Stalinism "let us die but the enemy will not let us in" everything is awful. what's the difference, really?

    “Rus-Russian civilization has always been formed as an empire of the second type. Even the name“ Russian ”extended to everyone who accepted the Russian way, Russian culture and Russian language. For Russians, all small peoples were“ people ”, not human material, people of the second, third grade "

    Lord, what a lie .... The heroes of all the peoples of the Russian Federation fought with the Russians, from Salavat Yulaev to Vasily Manchara. Why did they expel the Russians from Tuva? There Tuvans used to be forbidden even to travel in buses, in the front seats, as in Alabama. Well, the answer came in the 90s.

    "Now the Russian people have been deprived (at the level of politics, ideology) of their imperial essence, but since this is its program code, the Russian Federation is doomed to restore the empire - the world needs a Russian project of globalization"

    Russia is high time to go about their business, on their own land. World domination is a myth. Colonizers without pants.
    1. Joker
      +2
      19 September 2011 16: 39
      Quote: huraken
      Why do you think that it will be bad to live in the occupied territories? I suspect the opposite.


      Example Pindos occupied country in which he lives well. Could it be better in the former Yugoslavia? Or in Afghanistan they all had gas?
    2. walter_rus
      0
      15 June 2012 01: 53
      It turns out that you sleep there and see how to make us happy, like Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, and others. And about Tuva "where it was like in Alabama" - can you link to the source? Before talking about lies, look in the mirror. How Americans know Russia - there are already jokes about this. And we never needed world domination. These are from your dreams.
  12. Tyumen
    0
    19 September 2011 17: 33
    The main cause of death is the degeneration of the elite, the managerial class. It was not possible to create a sustainable subculture of reproduction of a patriotic, people-oriented elite.

    Sasha, look at the root. Who didn’t succeed? * Elite * ceased to be reproduced not by itself, but in the absence of the Leader. Peter, Elizabeth, Catherine, Nikolai, two Alexandra, Stalin - with patriots, Russia was strong. Nikolay2 - the collapse of the empire, Gorbachev - the collapse of the empire. At the first - terrifying bribery, betrayal, stuffing pockets of those in power. When the second is even worse, the empire was simply killed. Today, too, have not gone far.
    1. -2
      19 September 2011 17: 55
      Well, just do not blame Nicholas 2 for the collapse of the Empire. Nicholas 2 was a great man, but the years after the Soviet regime trampled his name in the mud ... and began to teach that he was spineless ... The empire was destroyed by the BAGS that were funded by England, the USA, France, Japan ... because they were afraid ... that having won the First World War, the borders of the Russian Empire would have passed so near France .... so read all the same the original story and not the one that is broadcast on every corner ...
      1. Tyumen
        -1
        19 September 2011 18: 52
        Read the diaries of Nicholas, then maybe add up your opinion about him.

        THE SCUMBARS WHICH WERE FUNDED BY ENGLAND, USA, FRANCE, JAPAN ..- they were ALWAYS, but only Nikolai and Gorbachev allowed the collapse of their empires. They are very similar - cowardly, weak-willed, incapable of tough decisions, mumbled with the gigantic influence of their wives. God forbid Russia from such rulers.
        1. -1
          19 September 2011 21: 33
          well. your point of view is clear. please your sources in the studio. So that the majority could get acquainted, just keep in mind that the entire Soviet history presented tsarism as "Bourgeois bourgeois freedom" ... therefore, please, without links to the wiki where any illiterate can publish any nonsense ...
          1. Tyumen
            -1
            20 September 2011 17: 29
            Read the atlas * Romanovs. 300 years of service to Russia *. I warn you, this is a book, and whether it is online, I do not know. I love real books.
      2. -1
        19 September 2011 19: 44
        Aha - "great!" "The regiment can manage, the empire - not capable!" one of his close and great real! said
  13. 0
    19 September 2011 17: 46
    huraken, another troll appeared. I saw it was offended in childhood, these bastards were not allowed to ride in the front seat by the Russian invaders.
    1. Tyumen
      -1
      19 September 2011 17: 57
      Just a narrow-minded person with brainwashed. This is even reluctant to dissuade. And it’s useless, this tribe is more stubborn than rams.
  14. +5
    19 September 2011 17: 52
    huraken - that's why you haven't left yet?

    "The Russian empires have always been very badly managed and life in them has always been hard-hitting, the people fled to Lithuania, Poland, Siberia, Persia."

    Go to Persia pliz ...

    I was born in Sevastopol, lived in the north, in the family it was mixed from Tatars to Poles, with admixtures of Ukrainians, Russians, even Jews.

    I am Russian!
    By the attitude of the world, by the fact that I do not care what happens to these people / peoples.
    Because for me, Ukrainian, Russian, Belarusian - OWN (then nationality)

    And that is precisely the essence of the Russian imperial essence.



    Ehay to Persia, my friend ...
  15. jamert
    +1
    19 September 2011 20: 08
    So, in the same Europe, one can note a successive change of empires that tried to unite the whole peninsula: Roman Empire - Empire of Charlemagne - “Holy Roman Empire of the German nation” - French Empire of Napoleon - Third Reich - European Union,


    Europe, it turns out to be a peninsula ...
  16. His
    +2
    19 September 2011 20: 38
    Russia was originally created as an empire
  17. +1
    19 September 2011 21: 28
    A Russian is someone who at heart considers himself Russian. In our country, he can be a person of any nationality who considers himself Russian. And abroad we are all called Russians. And the Russians are Yeltsin's invention, and a very unfortunate one. Now say something out loud in defense of the Russians, so they will be accused of nationalism, chauvinism, extremism and inflating interethnic contradictions. Now we, Russians, in our places of traditional residence do not feel safe. The point is ruled by those who changed yesterday's donkey in their aul to a cool "Merc" or "Behu" and dictate how we should live in our house. Zhirinovsky is right: Russia, Great Rus should be divided according to the territorial principle, and not according to the national principle. Then the peoples of Russia of all nationalities will be equal to each other. And Russia will only become stronger from this.
  18. +2
    19 September 2011 22: 26
    Or maybe the very idea of ​​restoring the Russian Empire, as a creative principle for normal people from normal (not infringed upon the imperial greatness of Russia) peoples, will become the unifying principle that should be laid in the foundation of the revival of the GREAT RUSSIAN EMPIRE? The author is right, Russia belongs to the second, creating type of empires, so why look somewhere for a national idea if it is on the surface and a huge number of people (not to be confused with trolls) want to restore the CREATING LIGHT EMPIRE! Honestly, I really want her to be reborn. I am imperial, like most on this site. And I see nothing wrong with that. Thanks to the author for the article!
  19. +1
    19 September 2011 22: 44
    Thanks for the article, join!
    1. ballian
      -4
      20 September 2011 13: 06
      Well - and someone else wonders why NATO believes that Russia is a potential adversary :)))))))))
      1. borkovn
        -4
        20 September 2011 15: 56
        The enemy of Russia is the lack of communism, and the enemy is China. NATO does not have ANY COMBAT AIRCRAFT in Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia. And Belarus and Russia on this "front" together have more than 600! Who calls whom enemy or enemy, you need to know and after this, think and write. It's true. Other vidums and ideas near the partisan fire are the past and do not take place when there is a serious dialogue. Russia is a great country, but the ratio is 600: 0. Talking is not in the crawl of the world.
        1. hundert
          0
          21 September 2011 11: 30
          would you first learn Russian wink , and NATO commitments given during the withdrawal of the SA from Europe, remembered.
          maybe then it would become clear why these aircraft.
  20. sol
    +3
    20 September 2011 13: 33
    It is believed that the Russian Empire is the heir to the name of Genghis Khan. Therefore, the unification of Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan into a customs union carries something more. By the way, the descendants of all clans who lifted Genghis Khan on a white cloth were included in the composition of the modern Kazakh people. Therefore, we are Kazakhs, also for the Empire.
  21. Dovmont
    -2
    20 September 2011 17: 32
    How I missed Mr. Ballyan’s comments !! wink
    1. ballian
      +2
      20 September 2011 19: 04
      Dear Dovmont, do you disagree with my comment? Please comment and refute.