"Pugachev"

33


240 years ago, 10 (21) January 1775, Yemelyan Ivanovich Pugachev was executed in Moscow on Bolotnaya Square. Calling himself "emperor Peter III," the Don Cossack raised the Yaik Cossacks to revolt. Soon the uprising turned into a fire of the Peasant War, which swept a huge region and caused panic in a part of the ruling class of the Russian Empire. They even called Alexander Suvorov, but managed to put out the fire of the war before his arrival. After a series of defeats, Pugacheva betrayed the Cossack officers, hoping to win a pardon from the government.

The main prerequisites of the Peasant War were two. First, in the XVIII century, the Romanovs created the classical serfdom. The Russian elite was divorced from the people, Europeanized. In fact, there are two “people” in Russia - the Europeanized nobility, speaking German and French better than Russian, and the people themselves, living their lives, very far from balls, masquerades and nobility living through life. Peter I tightened serfdom, and the “patriot” Elizaveta Petrovna legalized the sale of serfs. At the same time, after Peter Alekseevich, who, despite some of his negative traits, knew how to work, the nobility dissolved (though not all: people like Rumyantsev, Suvorov and Ushakov supported the honor of the empire). In St. Petersburg, balls and holidays rolled in a continuous succession; luxury fashion was quickly introduced. Provincial nobles tried to follow the fashion of the capital. That squeezed out of the serfs all that is possible, or sold them, lost, laid. Millions of rubles, survived from the peasantry, went on entertainment, on luxury items, not invested in the development of the country.

The factory (“assigned”) peasants, who were assigned to factories by entire villages, were given a particularly difficult situation, putting the industrialists and their clerks under the authority. The convicts, fugitive, local clerks had the opportunity to hide them or give bribes to the authorities in the factories of the Urals. In addition, the most active peasants still sought to hide in the Cossack regions, which had a certain autonomy. The atmosphere of general injustice created an opportunity for a large-scale fire, a broad social base for a possible uprising. The serfs hated landowners, factory workers — clerks, townspeople — embezzlers and officials who abused power.

Secondly, the difficult situation was in the Cossack troops. On the one hand, the Cossack troops were subordinated to the government, having lost their former independence. On the other hand, the central government was not particularly interested in the affairs of the Cossacks, letting them run by chance. The Cossack officers conversed with the authorities, which within the Army received almost uncontrolled power. This led to serious abuse. So, in the Don Army, the government usurped the "family" of the atamans Efremov. She seized military and stanitsa land, uncontrollably spent military money, installed exactions in their own interests. Looking at the “Tsar” by Stepan Efremov, the foreman was also enriched. Those who complained were beaten by ataman henchmen.

A similar situation exists in the Yaik Troops. Despite the preservation of self-government, the government assigned a Cossack officer, who manipulated the votes of the circle. Troop office has become virtually irremovable. Cossack foremen kept their salaries in their favor, introduced taxes on fishing and selling of fish, and other trades. Complaints of ordinary Cossacks did not give any results, since the officials sent in the office communicated with the elders and took bribes from them. As a result, the Cossacks split into the lured "ataman" and "folk" parties. Riots flared up. Even before the Pugachev uprising, a number of uprisings occurred, which were brutally suppressed. Cossacks were hung, impaled, and quartered. Thus, the ground for the uprising was prepared. Simple Cossacks were angry. Needed only a leader.

On the Don, the uprising was prevented. The government remembered, drew attention to the complaints of the Cossacks. Ataman Efremov summoned to St. Petersburg. However, he was in no hurry, he found reasons to get out. He began to dispel rumors among the Cossacks that they were going to be written into a “regularity”, scaring Petersburg with the possibility of insurrection. In order to deliver the chieftain to the capital, General Cherepov was sent, but his assistants beat him. Only from the second attempt Efremova was taken to Petersburg. From the capital to the Don, a commission was sent to investigate the complaints of the Cossacks, which was personally controlled by Potemkin and the Empress. The lands illegally seized by Ephraim were confiscated. Ataman was sentenced to death, but Catherine, in memory of the past participation in the palace coup, softened the sentence to exile.

On Yaik, the situation is out of control. An investigation commission was established in Yaitsky Town, but its decisions were not implemented. Cossack delegates sent to the empress were arrested, declared rebel and imprisoned. A rumor was spread about the army about enrolling in regular troops, which caused new unrest. When the western branch of the Kalmyks, which was in the citizenship of Russia, moved to the borders of China (the Khan wanted to occupy the lands devastated by the Chinese massacres), the Yaik Army received an order to chase and return the fugitives. However, the Cossacks refused to execute the order. In January, the Cossacks in Yaitsky Town, 1772, moved to the house where General Traubenberg and Captain Durnov were staying at the investigation commission. They demanded the removal of the Military Chancellery and the payment of a salary. Traubenberg, in response, led a military team with guns. Cossacks rushed to the attack and won. Traubenberg was killed; the ataman Tambovtsev was hanged. People were again sent to the capital to explain the situation. However, the authorities responded with a punitive expedition of General Freiman. The rebels broke. Hundreds of people were exiled to Siberia and recorded as soldiers. Troop self-government was abolished, the Army was subordinated to the commandant of the Yaitsky town.

As a result, the Cossacks, having received no justice, became angry. Moreover, the military foreman was also dissatisfied because of the liquidation of the local government, which gave them the opportunity to enrich themselves. It was then that Emelyan Pugachev appeared. The Don Cossack had experience of the Seven Years, the Polish and Russian-Turkish wars. He was a great fighter, served to the cornet. However, different adventurism, propensity to vagrancy. In 1771, Pugachev fell ill and was sent home for treatment. The Cossack went to Taganrog, to visit his sister. In a conversation with his son-in-law, Pugachov found out that he and several comrades were dissatisfied with the order in the regiment and wanted to desert. Pugachev helped Pavlov escape to the Kuban. But soon Pavlov changed his mind, returned and repented. And for helping to escape, Emelyan Pugachev was outlawed. Pugachev was forced into hiding, was repeatedly arrested and fled, trying to escape on the Terek. Been in the schismatic monasteries.

During the wanderings, Pugachev was on Yaik. At first, he wanted to incite a group of Cossacks to enter the service of the Ottomans like Nekrasovs. Here he was noticed by rich Cossacks, who did not want to leave the farm, but they wanted to organize a rebellion. They planned to scare the government, to return self-government. As a result, Pugachev turned into “Peter III Fedorovich”, becoming an impostor. 18 September 1773, a small squad of Pugachev appeared at Yaitsky town. It was not possible to take the fortress and Pugachyov and the army headed up the Yaik. The seizure of the Yaikskaya line fortresses — the Alluvial, Nizhneozernaya, Tatishcheva, and Chernorechenskaya lines — took place according to a similar scenario. The garrisons of small fortresses, consisting of soldiers and Cossacks who had been written off as disabled, mostly went over to the side of the rebels. The officers were killed.

In Seitovaya Sloboda, a decree was issued to the Mishars (meshermen) and the Bashkirs with a call to join the "sovereign" army, in return they promised gunpowder and salt, possession of forests and rivers. Began active accession to the uprising of the Bashkirs, Tatars and Kalmyks. October 5 1773 of the year 7-th. Pugachev's detachment approached Orenburg. The siege lasted until mid-March 1774 and did not lead to success. As a result, the main forces of Pugachev were linked with the siege of Orenburg, which allowed the government to take retaliatory measures and not allow the Cossacks to revolt in the central provinces of Russia, which could sharply complicate the situation.

Pugachev still portrayed the king, arranged feasts, tried to take Orenburg. However, his colonels, Cossack officers, had real power. Zarubin, Shigaev, Padurov, Ovchinnikov, Chumakov, Lysov, Perfilyev and others jealously followed Pugachev, did not allow new people to appear around him who could influence the decision of the “tsar”. Thus, several officers were killed, who took the oath to the “tsar”, his beloved Kharlov, the widow of the commandant of Lower Lake Fortress who was hanged the day before. Cossack officers had several options. Could try to ignite a new Troubles. However, this scenario was broken by a protracted siege of Orenburg, which led to the loss of a strategic initiative by the Cossacks. In addition, one could simply “take a walk”, intimidate Petersburg, forcing him to make concessions, and then surrender Pugachev for reprisal. In fact, the rebels did not have a positive program, so the Peasant War was doomed to failure.

In the spring of 1774, the situation of the rebels was complicated. Reliable troops began to be deployed from the Turkish front. The pacification was entrusted to the experienced general Alexander Bibikov. The Pugachevists began to suffer defeat, losing one by one the fortresses on the frontier lines. The siege was lifted from Orenburg. 22 March in a battle near the fortress Tatishcheva Pugachev were defeated. April 1 suffered another heavy defeat at the Sakmara town. However, the death of General Bibikov caused a pause in the fighting, among the generals began to intrigue. The rebels, defeated and scattered across the steppe, were able to regroup their forces by gathering in the Upper Urals. 5-6 May rebels were able to take the Magnit Fortress. The Ural peasants and the Gornozavodsk workers filled up the detachments of Pugachev.

The army of Pugachev becomes peasant in its composition, losing its combat capability and the ability to oppose government forces in open battle. The war took on the character of flight and pursuit. Pugachev suffers another defeat, runs, on the way new crowds of insurgent peasants, workers and foreigners adjoin him. The estates are burning, the nobles and clerks are killed, their families. Again defeat and flight.

The war is gaining momentum. The Pugachev men take the fortresses of Karagai, Petropavlovsk and Steppe. 20 May ended the assault on Trinity Fortress. However, on May 21, the camp of the rebels was defeated by the troops of General I. A. Dekolong. Most of the rebels were captured or scattered. Pugachev again with a small group runs. His squad reinforce Bashkirs Salavat Yulaev. 10 June Pugachyov joined Krasnoufimsk, then took the town of Osu. The Pugachevs moved to the right bank of the Kama, took in 20-s of June Christmas, Votkinsky and Izhevsk plants. July 12 was taken most of Kazan. There was almost no troops here, everyone left for Orenburg. Here Pugachev was overtaken by General Mikhelson. The rebels suffered a cruel defeat.

Pugachev fled with a detachment to 500 and a man crossed the Volga. Here serfs began to join the rebels. The peasants joined the "king" or made up separate units. Most of the Bashkirs refused to follow the “tsar” and returned to the Ufa region, where the uprising continued into late autumn 1774. Pugachev did not dare to go to Moscow. I turned south, decided to go through the Volga cities, then raise the Don or go to the Kuban.

Volga cities - Kurmysh, Alatyr, Saransk, Penza, Saratov, actually surrendered without a fight. The impostor was greeted with bread and salt, and "priests - with crosses." Pugachev again gathered a large force - up to 10 thousand people. The government had to send additional forces to suppress the uprising. They threw on Pugachev and the famous Suvorov.

Pugachev, having reached the Don Cossack Army, understood that it would not be possible to raise the Don Cossacks. Tsaritsyn failed to take. 25 August 1774, General Mikhelson defeated the rebels at Black Yar. In one battle, more than 8 thousand people were killed and captured. Among the dead was a prominent ally of the impostor Andrei Ovchinnikov. Pugachev fled the Volga with a small group of Cossacks. The impostor offered the Cossacks to flee further, to the Zaporozhye Cossacks, or to Turkey, like Nekrasovs, or to go to Bashkiria or Siberia. However, the Cossack colonels decided to hand over to the authorities of Pugachev and get a pardon. September 8 Pugachev was tied up and September 15 was taken to the town of Yaitsky.

4 November convoy team delivered Pugacheva to Moscow. December 31 announced the verdict: “Emeruka Pugachev quartered, head stuck on a stake, spread the body parts in four parts of the city and put on the wheels, and then burn in those places.” The sentence was enforced on 10 (21) on January 1775 on Bolotnaya Square. Standing on the scaffold, Pugachev said: “Forgive me, Orthodox people, let me go, what I have sinned before you ... Forgive me, Orthodox people!”

The village of Zimoveyskaya, where Emelyan Pugachev was born, was renamed Potemkinskaya. At the end of 1775, Empress Catherine II announced a general forgiveness to the surviving participants in the uprising and ordered her to be forgotten forever. For this, the Yaik River was renamed the Urals, the Yaitsky town - into Uralsk, and the Yaitsky Army - into the Urals. At the same time, the management of the Ural troops was reformed on the model of Donskoy, general circles were canceled, and the military atamans became appointed.
33 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    12 January 2015 06: 07
    I already forgot ... in which museum the "cage" in which Pugachev was taken is exhibited ... when the first time he was with his father in Moscow, probably at the age of 14, he took me to this museum, I remember touching the bars of the "cage", quietly said: "yes, Emelya, this is not a bullpen, you won't run away, but it's a pity ..." (father worked in the Ministry of Internal Affairs)
    1. +9
      12 January 2015 06: 58
      The cell in which Pugachev was directly taken was wooden and not preserved.
      But the cast-iron cage in which Pugachev was kept after his arrest was in the Pugachev Museum in Uralsk.
      Pugachev personally escorted Suvorov, at that time a lieutenant general specially recalled from Turkey. So the authorities were afraid of Yemelyan.
      1. +2
        12 January 2015 07: 31
        Quote: Hairy Siberian
        But the cast-iron cage in which Pugachev was kept after his arrest was in the Pugachev Museum in Uralsk.

        it may very well be ... there was probably a copy, I won’t argue, I don’t have information ... what
  2. +4
    12 January 2015 07: 26
    interesting, informative article ... good
  3. +12
    12 January 2015 07: 40
    It is fashionable now to call Emelyan Pugachev differently, but the fact remains that the people got their rights trampled upon, the cries of noble liberties somehow overshadowed the lawlessness of the serfs.
  4. +13
    12 January 2015 07: 53
    Catherine II gave "free" to the nobles did not give the same free to the peasants - which gave rise to a slowly smoldering time bomb, which exploded in 1917. and destroyed the entire Romanov dynasty - the tsar and his family were shot ... the reigning Romanovs were gone.
    It was for this reason that the authorities could not cope with Pugachev for so long - the people supported him, believing that the German Katka and her nobles - accomplices were hiding the free peasants. The mentality of the peasantry was structured as follows:
    1. There is a Tsar - his authority is from God and he is the Father of the people, the Tsar-priest. The Church helps him.
    2. There are nobles - royal servants. These servants may not belong to the people, but they should be beneficial.
    3. is the World - the people.
    And the World, on the council’s code, recognized it fair to process the nobles so that they would fight and give their lives for the Tsar-Father and therefore for Peace. And the nobles served, and all their lives. Catherine II violated this balance, giving the nobles free: henceforth, they could serve and could not serve - to be parasites from the point of view of the World.
    1. +22
      12 January 2015 08: 12
      They didn’t shoot the tsar, but citizen Romanov, who abdicated the throne, why many officers, not the court slime-men, but the military ones, supported the Bolsheviks. In general, the situation before the uprising is very reminiscent of ours today. A bunch of bogey nouveau riche call themselves elite.
      1. +3
        12 January 2015 11: 44
        Supported by a smaller part and mostly minor ranks
        1. 0
          13 January 2015 14: 27
          The February Revolution (which deposed the Emperor) is a typical "general conspiracy". What are the lower ranks.
          Yes, and October supported many of the highest generals. Surnames Brusilov, Samoilo, Bonch-Bruevich (not Lenin's comrade-in-arms, but his brother), Fedorov, Ignatiev (count!) - they don’t tell you anything?
      2. 11111mail.ru
        +3
        12 January 2015 18: 45
        Quote: k1995
        A bunch of bogey nouveau riche call themselves elite.

        1. ... frantic ...
        2. ... name (see "heap", ie singular number).
    2. 0
      12 January 2015 11: 46
      Do not forget that in the first place it is important to preserve the state and not cataclysms. It is not known yet who would eat us))) from Western friends if the civilian began
      1. +4
        12 January 2015 16: 06
        Quote: Siberia
        Do not forget that in the first place it is important to preserve the state and not cataclysms. It is not known yet who would eat us))) from Western friends if the civilian began

        With the irresponsibility and greed of the elites, cataclysms are inevitable, as evidenced by this historical excursus. Under unfair and stupid rule, people's discontent accumulates as a charge on the contacts of the capacitor. In Russia, this charge has been accumulating for a long time, but it is so powerful that it can destroy the state itself. So the patience of the Russian people is a double-edged sword and should not be abused in any case.
    3. 11111mail.ru
      0
      12 January 2015 18: 43
      Quote: Smoke
      Catherine II gave "freedom" to the nobles

      Quote: Smoke
      Catherine II violated this balance, giving the nobles free: henceforth they could serve but could not serve - to be parasites

      You, sir, ascribe to "Pugachev's wife" what Emperor Peter III actually did.
      1. +1
        12 January 2015 21: 36
        Hubby did not rule her for long, so Katerina 2 was the answer. She was elevated to the throne with the condition of preserving these liberties. But she could not give a damn about such conditions - the tsarina of the Orthodox is not obliged to observe the conditions imposed by force, but did not, she was afraid to aggravate.
    4. 0
      14 January 2015 12: 38
      "Catherine II gave" freedom "to the nobles did not give the same freedom to the peasants -
      what gave rise to a slowly smoldering time bomb, which exploded in 1917 "/////

      The free peasants were given by Emperor Alexander II "Liberator" in 2.
      Before the revolutions of 1917 there was another one - 1905, which was hardly suppressed
      for 2-3 years.
  5. +3
    12 January 2015 07: 57
    A good article .. Objective .. Then on the web I came across an article about the Pugachev uprising .. like the last battle of Tartaria .. I have not read such nonsense ..
    1. 0
      12 January 2015 22: 12
      Quote: parusnik
      A good article .. Objective .. Then on the web I came across an article about the Pugachev uprising .. like the last battle of Tartaria .. I have not read such nonsense ..

      and you read carefully!
      it’s not that they write the truth there! is that what you call true
      Good article .. Objective ..

      you can write anything, but the truth is somewhere nearby! and what you call
      Then on the web I came across an article about the Pugachev revolt .. of the type the last battle of Tartaria .. I have not read such nonsense ..
      He does not deny the story presented by this article; there is an event, but interprets it differently!
      you know! by and large you take it on faith and without a doubt "Hollywood", this is almost the same thing that happened in Paris, like there is a mention of alkaide, but now they are focusing on isis ...
      although in my opinion, I was not there, and hence all this confusion in Paris, "Hollywood", where the special services of France, controlled by pin.dos.tan, may be with the participation of supporters of the alkaida (although for me it was then inserted a photo, brought the testimony of some eyewitness, who, by the way, fell out of the script, announcing the alkaid, instead of the igils, he probably confused! , and now they start some kind of scenario for which the action was created! or even just read the information they need in order to spread some kind of nonsense in the media ...
      sorry for the rude comparison, but the truth is not what they show you! even if you yourself see, but not a participant, even if a participant, but cannot find a problem, then you will never know the truth! especially after many years!
      there was a film in which the phrase was exaggerated: the truth is somewhere nearby!
      but there is one true rule, the axiom: the truth is not something you were given to see! especially if you yourself have not seen and have not been a participant, even if you were a participant, then you can see only part of the truth! even the scriptwriter, after the script is executed, improvises to fit the result or make it better if the situation allows it !!! ...
  6. +2
    12 January 2015 08: 09
    Short, detailed and clear. Thank you for the historical portrait of an interesting historical person!
  7. +4
    12 January 2015 09: 44
    I'll add it myself. Since the days of Pushkin's "The Captain's Daughter", it is customary for us to represent Pugachev as a simple man, but a person who has reached the rank of officer is hardly so simple.
    1. avt
      +7
      12 January 2015 10: 24
      Quote: Gardamir
      I'll add it myself. Since the days of Pushkin's "The Captain's Daughter", it is customary for us to represent Pugachev as a simple man, but a person who has reached the rank of officer is hardly so simple.

      what request "The history of the Pugachev revolt" which was written by the same Pushkin and which in ALL full editions was printed from you from childhood, hid! ??? laughing In fact, he wrote it with the permission of the king to travel to the places of events and collect material on the ground from a wide range of people. Of course, the general outline is sustained in the form of a riot, but it is quite possible to draw up the scale of the events taking place - an almost full-scale civil war and an underlying reason. By the way, the most interesting question arises for the "defenders of Orthodoxy", the support ", but what is the" support "- the direct" builders "of the Russian State. How does it happen that the Cossacks really become the main fighting force of any major mess in large-scale hostilities against this particular Orthodox state? Not - of course, oppression there, but how is it all dashingly develops - "to fight the oppression", the defenders of Orthodoxy and the Fatherland "begin in the most difficult years for this very Fatherland ?? Well, let's leave aside the Time of Troubles with the siege of the Trinity Lavra by the Poles together with the Cossacks. But what about the mutiny of Stepan Timofeevich in the midst of Lesha Romanov's hack with Poland for a kind of liberation from the Poles of the Orthodox brothers in Ukraine, at their request? Kondrat Bulavin's mutiny on the Don again? Well, the classic of the genre - Emelyan, who came from the front of the Polish company, organized a large-scale Civil War so famously? Further, as in the knock-down Krasnov with "Cossack" caught in the end, whom the Germans dragged with his comrades in the train of the SS tank corps, despite the SS oath, the Cossack corps was never ranked, in contrast to the Galicians - proven lackeys, in the SS troops and The tendency, however, is how it develops that under a strong central government, the Cossacks really serve themselves faithfully, but if you only weaken the state system under ANY social system - save and save Christ from such, defenders "and Orthodoxy and the fatherland. One confusion and vacillation and ultimately rebellion and blood.
      1. 11111mail.ru
        +1
        12 January 2015 18: 56
        Quote: avt
        but one has only to weaken the state system under ANY social system - save and save Christ from such "defenders" of both Orthodoxy and the fatherland. One confusion and vacillation and ultimately rebellion and blood.

        From 1991 to 1993 ... "When all the ... the Cossacks revolted, a coup took place in Birobidzhan" ... And in the civil war, the Cossacks were the most efficient and staunch fighters against the "internationalists": the Don, Kuban, Ural, Semirechenskoe, Transbaikal , Ussuriysk. Why, huh?
        1. avt
          0
          12 January 2015 19: 11
          Quote: 11111mail.ru
          ... And in the civil war the most efficient and staunch fighters against the "internationalists" were just the Cossacks: the Don, Kuban, Ural, Semirechye, Transbaikal, Ussuriysk. Why, huh?

          Because the history of the Civil War has been poorly studied, or judge it not by specific facts, but by the legends of the newly-minted “Cossack historians.” If they had not been too lazy, we would have learned why General Kaledin on the Don shot himself out of shame and with whom Kornilov went to, Ice campaign ", and at the same time they would have learned how Krasnov began to build the" Cossack "and his real participation in the" White movement ", and not only about the breakthrough of the Shkuro and Mamontov corps, liquidated by the Budenny corps, later deployed to the Red Cavalry 1. about where and how the ataman Semyonov came from and how he miraculously became a general and “valiantly” fought with the Bolsheviks together with similar formations of “whites”. Here are the Ural Cossacks - yes, for which they paid, unlike the same Donets and Kubans - everyone was wiped out, as well as, for a moment of attention, the Ural WORKERS from Pepelyaev's division, who under the RED flag went to the Bolsheviks in a psychic attack - there were no cartridges, well, they did not put weapons to Kolchak, the Japs gold Rali, but they "forgot" to put the weapon. Then, in the film, "Chapaev" became entirely gold-driven officers.
  8. +2
    12 January 2015 09: 44
    It is written interestingly and fascinatingly. For a foreigner who does not know the history of Russia in detail, Pugachov does not look like a national hero, then someone is very close to this. And a couple of months ago here I was reading an article about Pugachev, where he looked like a creature of hell. Remarkable historical figures are always ambiguous.
  9. +6
    12 January 2015 10: 35
    You should not idealize Pugachev and look at his deeds from the point of view of Marxism. There are a number of interesting facts about his reign. For instance ; a large number of exiled officers, by nationality Poles, served with Pugachev. I really don't believe that the Poles, out of love for the Russian people, went after Pugachev. Pugachev skins off the living from people (not only officers) who did not want to recognize him as a "tsar". There were more than one case of robbery of peaceful peasants by his army. The article very well indicates the reasons for the uprising, but very poorly shows the forces of the rebels and where the funds came from. Pugachev minted his own coin, several barrels of coins were found, where and who printed? Not all peasants and Cossacks supported Pugachev. Don, some of the Yaik Cossacks did not support Pugachev, and moreover, some of them opposed his troops. The timing of the uprisings is especially surprising, pay attention. Bolotnikov and Zarutsky during the "turmoil", Kondraty Bulavinov raised an uprising on the eve of the Battle of Poltava, Pugachev during the Russian-Turkish war and Razin during the Russian-Polish war and the war with Turkey (he started the uprising because of the execution of his elder brother Ivan by Prince Dolgorukov ). All the leaders of the uprisings were not from the poor part of the Cossacks, they were quite wealthy people. In Russia, all uprisings begin, as a rule, in difficult times for the state. Interestingly, they are usually headed not by poor people, but by those offended by the authorities. If timely measures were not taken to suppress, then Russia either lost what it had won or was forced to make big concessions.
    1. +4
      12 January 2015 18: 57
      Captain: "Several barrels of coins were found." Dear Yuri, I would add, if you allow.
      After an investigation, not only Polish officers were found in Pugachev's troops, but also documents of English origin about the rules of warfare and financial documents of this state. With the uprisings in Russia, not everything is so simple. I can also add that my maternal ancestor was an officer and defended the Orenburg fortress. A.S. Pushkin even in "The Captain's Daughter" gave his name. Pugachev's wife languished for many years in Priozersk (this is near St. Petersburg). She was kept in a cave that was heated only by a fire. In my youth I saw these places. Yes, the peoples of Russia got it from the tsars and from the system that they supported. I have the honor.
    2. +1
      12 January 2015 18: 57
      Captain: "Several barrels of coins were found." Dear Yuri, I would add, if you allow.
      After an investigation, not only Polish officers were found in Pugachev's troops, but also documents of English origin about the rules of warfare and financial documents of this state. With the uprisings in Russia, not everything is so simple. I can also add that my maternal ancestor was an officer and defended the Orenburg fortress. A.S. Pushkin even in "The Captain's Daughter" gave his name. Pugachev's wife languished for many years in Priozersk (this is near St. Petersburg). She was kept in a cave that was heated only by a fire. In my youth I saw these places. Yes, the peoples of Russia got it from the tsars and from the system that they supported. I have the honor.
  10. +5
    12 January 2015 10: 42
    Quote: parusnik
    A good article .. Objective .. Then on the web I came across an article about the Pugachev uprising .. like the last battle of Tartaria .. I have not read such nonsense ..


    Objective? I would not argue. As you know, access to some historical documents is limited. Most of the documents on this uprising are on these lists. Why? I do not know. Therefore, they interpret this part of the story as anyone wants. In this article, we are presented on a silver platter with the cause of the uprising - the snickering elite. They hint at a connection between Pugachev and the Ottoman Empire. This is Brad. Although if we draw a parallel, then Pugachev from this article and our pseudo-corruption fighter Navalny seem to be one person. In psychology, there is such a concept "method of associations", and so this article is nothing more than a complex metaphor, nothing more.
    And to say that Tartary is nonsense is also not worth it. The opening of the geographical society by Putin - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_k97crlKPVs, once we did not even know about such and such a word "Tartaria", but now its existence has become a fact. Considering the fact that the president does not do anything just like that, then Putin's participation in the opening of the Russian Geographical Society and the demonstration of the atlas of Tartary suggests that this is a hint of the former greatness of Russia to someone, and his intention to follow exactly this path.
    1. 11111mail.ru
      +2
      12 January 2015 19: 00
      Quote: Vyacheslav
      Putin's participation in the opening of the Russian Geographical Society and a demonstration of the atlas of Tartaria

      It is clear to us, the gray ones, that the "Englishwoman crap", but for some reason is it indicated on "theirs" maps of Tartary? "Do all the calendars lie?"
      1. avt
        +1
        12 January 2015 20: 01
        Quote: 11111mail.ru
        ? "Do all the calendars lie?"

        No . They don't lie. You have noticed correctly - the maps drawn up by Western ambassadors for OWN sovereigns are really very interesting! I somehow started to think about it in my youth, when I saw the map of Sigismud Herberstein and part of his reports - a practical intelligence report! It was especially striking then - the map in the corner was titled as the image of the Empire! It was not Tartary, she as an integral part of it, not Muscovy - as a Grand Duchy, namely the Empire! And all this was already when Petya No. 1, even in the form of a sperm, was not present in search of an egg! And later familiarization with the remaining chronicles about the Mongols "and the absence of proper" Mongolian "in the" Mongol "language, prompted an almost Nazi act - he threw out the Jan trilogy from his home library laughing But I didn't burn it - I sold it in a second-hand bookseller. By the way, I forgot to mention - there was a collection of ancient maps in the Vorontsov Palace in Crimea during the Soviet era! She disappeared at the beginning of the glorious "independence" of Ukraine! And there was a lot of interesting things.
  11. Nikolav
    +1
    12 January 2015 13: 03
    It should also be added that Pugacheva was supported mainly by the Yaitsk Cossack army and foreigners. The Orenburg Cossack army basically did not support Pugachev, and those who were on his side were considered unreliable.
    As a result, Pugachev unsuccessfully besieged Orenburg for almost six months, lost time and lost initiative.
    1. avt
      +2
      12 January 2015 13: 45
      Quote: Nicholas
      besieged Orenburg for almost six months, lost time and lost initiative.

      Well, curious about the same Pushkin a little more "Captain's daughter"! The scale and direction of Pugachev's offensive was much greater than the siege of Orenburg and its heroic defense, but Katya No. 2, again, according to the recollections of the inner circle, slept with a stash of diamonds on a case of escape with the victory of Pugachev, well, just like Churchill was preparing to evacuate to Canada.Yes, he almost reached Moscow, sometimes not hundreds of his formations - out of several thousand militants competently in the operational plan worked in different directions and only transferred regular units under under the command of the same Mikhelson and Suvorov with combat experience under the unified command of a specific character appointed by Katya # 2 in charge of the entire operation.
      1. Nikolav
        +2
        12 January 2015 15: 01
        I seriously took an interest in the question, the Orenburg horn itself. If all the details and nuances are written, it will not be a comment, but Shishkov’s novel with a famous name.
    2. +2
      12 January 2015 18: 05
      And what was the Orenburg Cossack army at that time? Please do not compare the Yaitsk army, which itself organized, had at least 3 centuries of history and its own laws and traditions, which itself decided its fate and entered the Russian state and immediately compare artificial education and called the Orenburg army
      1. Nikolav
        +1
        13 January 2015 11: 14
        I could not answer you yesterday. My answer is today. I looked, you are from Uralsk, I understood your ardor. It is understandable, each sandpiper praises its swamp. And there’s nothing to argue about. The foundation of the Orenburg Cossack army was laid by the Iset (from 1581), Ufa (from 1574) and Samara (from 1586) Cossacks. Before proceeding with the construction of Orenburg, it was decided that
        the population for colonization can be attracted from among the Cossacks, who
        live along the banks of the Volga and its tributaries, as well as from the Samara,
        Volga, Ufa, Siberian and part of the Yaik Cossacks. They were supposed to be settled in Orenburg and in the newly built fortresses. The decree of February 11, 1736, for example, announces: “For settlement near Orenburg and other cities of light troops: take you hunters from Yaitsky Cossacks up to 500 people, and from the Siberian neighboring cities of Cossack and noble children of the Never-Standing, and up to 1000 people not put in the capitation, and from the Ufa servants Meshcheryakov
        (Mishars), and upon settlement give them a salary for the construction of houses, against the Volga Cossacks. ” I.I. Neplyuyev, in 1743, forced to settle 550 Cossacks, who, together with the Berd Cossacks, made up Orenburg from Samara Cossacks, and 100 people from the Cossack Mochinsky settlement, settled in the city of Orenburg, with a special forestad, transferred from Ufa and Samara. In 1744, the number of Cossacks in the region increased to 2415 people, because the fugitives were recorded as Cossacks in the newly built fortresses. The Orenburg Cossack army, gradually growing and developing, developed its own special spirit and gained its military glory, mainly during the defense of the eastern frontier borders of the State from the invasion of the Central Asian hordes, which lasted about 300 years, and then from 1864 in Central Asia during the occupation of Turkestan Krai. Towards the end of the 1897th - beginning of the 365th centuries. The Orenburg Cossack army remained the third largest among the Cossack troops of Russia. According to the census of 1916, there were 579 thousand Cossacks. By XNUMX, the Cossack population increased significantly and amounted to XNUMX thousand people. Seniority of the Army is not defined. And the Ural Cossack army is indeed the second oldest, after the Don.
        All my childhood, youth and youth I had to spend in Orenburg, living in Forshtadt. When he was a kid, my father rented an apartment with an old Cossack, the old one was already an old man, kind one. I was somehow impressed by the memory, on May 9 he invited me to his room, opened the chest, dressed in a blue Cossack uniform, a checker was on the bottom of the chest , he did not cling to it. And on the tunic there are three George! Now I understand that the grandfather of that saber obviously did not open canned food. We went out with him, sat down on a bench, he leaned on his badik and we began to stare at the festive people passing by. The next year, my grandfather died ...
  12. 0
    12 January 2015 17: 59
    From a good life no one will fight. In Russia at that time, a slave system was established. and in its most terrible form. Rome, amid this damned Saltychikha, is just resting. What do you ........ Exile reptiles Pugachev? I am a descendant of those who destroyed tsarism and destroyed the fascist reptile.
    1. 11111mail.ru
      +3
      12 January 2015 19: 05
      Quote: Free Wind
      I am a descendant of those who destroyed tsarism and destroyed the fascist reptile.

      Well, okay, a FASCIST reptile, that's a plus, but for four girls and a kid hemophilic in pieces and sulfuric acid for what?
  13. +2
    12 January 2015 18: 02
    one thing is certain: we are officially lying to this day.
  14. +2
    12 January 2015 19: 15
    The liberty of the nobility was granted by Peter III. That all the so-called "peasant wars" took place in the most difficult times for the Russian, Russian state, is an indisputable fact. Above, colleagues wrote about this. But back to the "Pugachev revolt". I believe that A.S. Pushkin described this turmoil quite fully. The uprising was well prepared. It is enough to remember with whom we fought. The pacification of the Poles, the conquest of the Crimea, so that Polish and Turkish money helped a lot to shake the foundations. And the ideological component. People's faith in the "good tsar", who advised Emelyan Pugachev? Genuine Holstein banner of Peter. By the way, both the cage and the banner can be seen in the Historical Museum.
    As for our greatest military genius Alexander Vasilyevich. Only, only he was promoted to the rank of lieutenant general. He commanded a corps in Rumyantsev's army, clashed with Kamensky, there were already victories, Turuktai, the capture of Prague (a suburb of Warsaw), but all the Glory was only ahead: Fokshany, Rymnik, Izmail, Finland, the Italian and Swiss campaigns. And during the "peasant war" a popular general ... And yet not the same Suvorov, whom grateful Russia and Europe know ...
    1. +1
      12 January 2015 22: 31
      That's right. I think the American State Department has not done without it. Emelya must have personally run to the American embassy, ​​where he was supplied with money by the Zhidobandera, even a video should be attached. In general, it was a conspiracy of Masons who wanted to destroy the magnificent Tsarist Russia.
  15. 11111mail.ru
    +3
    12 January 2015 19: 15
    I read in the 7th grade A.S. Pushkin "The Captain's Daughter", then in the 2nd year of the institute of his own "History of the Pugachev revolt", but the second essay will be stronger, in terms of the nobles exterminated by the rebels. Emelyan Ivanovich should not be poeticized, and his executioners should not be poetized either. But the nobility did not understand the poet's prediction: "God forbid to see the Russian revolt, senseless and merciless." The poet's words, yes "our" oligarchs in the ears ...
    1. Cat
      +2
      12 January 2015 21: 43
      I could not resist, I will insert my pearl into your polemic. I find it difficult to name the author of the quote, but it will probably complement the whole picture as objectively as possible, that distant and merciless turmoil. "Serfs with the Cossacks over and over again attacked the Shaitan plant, which was defended serf workers".
      THERE IS NO SCARY AND RAPID WAR OF CIVIL, WHEN THE BROTHER GOES TO THE BROTHER, AND THE SON TO THE FATHER.
  16. 0
    12 January 2015 21: 57
    Here are a couple more links to interesting articles about "Pugachevshchina": http: //rusplt.ru/policy/emelyan-pugachev-i-natsionainyiy
    -vopros-14017.htlm, http://file-rf.ru/analitiics/687
  17. 0
    12 January 2015 23: 52
    Quote: Grenader
    Quote: Siberia
    Do not forget that in the first place it is important to preserve the state and not cataclysms. It is not known yet who would eat us))) from Western friends if the civilian began

    With the irresponsibility and greed of the elites, cataclysms are inevitable, as evidenced by this historical excursus. Under unfair and stupid rule, people's discontent accumulates as a charge on the contacts of the capacitor. In Russia, this charge has been accumulating for a long time, but it is so powerful that it can destroy the state itself. So the patience of the Russian people is a double-edged sword and should not be abused in any case.
    And what is the Elite, and on what basis is it determined?
  18. 0
    13 January 2015 00: 29
    Any encroachment on legal authority (regardless of time and form of government) is a CRIME!
    The Pugachev revolt is nothing but an adventure, Pushkin did not investigate, but only in literary form described these events.
    Do not forget that A.S. Pushkin, allegedly such a freethinker, did not cooperate with the authorities? Yes, and in our time, any historian, even knowing the truth, will interpret this truth as it is convenient for the state.
  19. +1
    16 January 2015 16: 33
    Pugachev’s personality is unique and interesting in its own way. Thank you for the article.