Day of Military Glory of Russia, the Battle of Borodino, August 26 (September 7 in a new way)

30
Day of Military Glory of Russia, the Battle of Borodino, August 26 (September 7 in a new way)


In August, 1812 of the Borodino field was confronted in a fierce clash by two opposing armies: the Russian army under the command of Infantry General Mikhail Illarionovich Golenishchev-Kutuzov and the Great Army of the French Emperor Napoleon Bonaparte.

About 300 of thousands of people with 1200 artillery guns participated in this grand battle on both sides.

24 August a fierce battle broke out in the area of ​​the village of Shevardino. 11-thousandth detachment under the command of A.I. Supported by units of the 36 Grenadier and 2 S Combined Grenadier Divisions, Gorchakov with 2 guns was repeatedly attacked by superior enemy forces. On the part of Napoleon, about 40 thousands of people participated in this battle with 186 guns. Before the onset of darkness, the Russians held a position at the Shevardino Redoubt, which had been erected the day before as the forward strong point for the defense of the left flank of the Russian army. Already in the night, by order of the Commander-in-Chief, Lieutenant-General Gorchakov led the remnants of their troops to the main position near the village of Semenovskoye. Losses in this battle on each side amounted to 6 thousands killed and wounded.

25 August in the area of ​​the Borodino field of active hostilities was not conducted. Both armies were preparing for a decisive, general battle, scouting and building field fortifications.



According to the disposition signed by M.I. Kutuzov 24 August, 114 thousands of soldiers of the regular army with 624 guns, along with 9500 Cossacks and almost 22-thousandth Moscow and Smolensk militias located on the front 8 km from northeast to south from the confluence of the river Kolochy in the Moscow River to the village Utitsa .The position of the right flank, consisting of the troops of the 1 th Western Army (about 86 thousand people) under the command of the General of Infantry MB Barclay de Tolly, passed from the Moscow River along the high right bank of the Kolocha River through the New Smolensk road and ended at the Raevsky battery in the center of the Borodino field. The left flank, consisting of compounds of the 2 of the Western Army (about 34 thousands of people) under the command of the Infantry General from I.I. Bagration, started from the Rayevsky battery (inclusive) and ended in the Utitsky Forest, where the Old Smolensk Road ran. Main apartment M.I. Kutuzov located in the estate Tatarinovo east of the village of Borodin.

Napoleon decided to deliver the main blow to the left flank of the Russian position. The role of auxiliary strikes was assigned to attacks on the village of Borodino and on the corps of General Tuchkov-1, who defended his position on the Old Smolensk Road.



26 August already by five o'clock in the morning the French army, having in its composition about 135 thousands of people and 587 guns, is located as follows. On the right flank, in the Utitsky Forest on the Old Smolensk Road, is the Polish Corps of General Poniatowski, between the Utitsky Forest and the Koloch River - the corps of Marshals Davout and Ney, General Junot, the Old and Young Guards, and three reserve cavalry corps of Marshal Murat. On the left flank, across the river Kolochya, there is the Italian corps of the viceroy Eugene Beauharnais, the stepson of the emperor Napoleon, two infantry divisions and the cavalry corps of General Grusha assigned to him on the day of the battle. Napoleon's headquarters is located near the village of Valuev in the north-western outskirts of the Borodino field, and the command post is located at the Shevardino Redoubt.

Around 6 in the morning of August 26, the famous battle of Borodino began. The division of General Delzon from the corps of Beaugarna suddenly attacked the village of Borodino and by 7 hours of the morning ousted the defenders of this village - the Life Guards Jäger regiment, which retreated and took up a position on the right bank of the Kolochi River. Three Jaeger regiments arrived in time for the help of the rangers, and all the enemy’s attempts to break through the Russian defenses were unsuccessful.
Almost simultaneously, the main attack was inflicted on the Russian left flank, on the Semyonovskiy (Bagrationov) flushes, which were the advanced fortifications of the general defense system of the left flank. Fierce fighting in this direction lasted almost until noon.
Marshal Murat in the Battle of Borodino. Lithograph of fig. H.V. Faber du Faure. 1830-s.



Tens of thousands of people with the endless rumble of 800 guns came together in bloody combat. In a united effort to defeat the enemy, Russian infantry, artillery and cavalry repulsed several attacks; while flushes repeatedly passed from hand to hand. After the injury of Prince Bagration, at around 10, in the morning, Lieutenant-General P.P. takes command of the troops. Konovnitsyn, who, assessing the situation, gives an order to leave flushes and their defenders to leave Semyonovsky ravine for gentle heights.

In the afternoon, Napoleon, obsessed with striving to break through the defenses of the left flank of the Russian troops at all costs, threw the Latour-Mobour and Nansuti cavalry corps into attack. At that time, on the orders of Kutuzov, Lieutenant-General DS received command of the forces of the left flank. Dokhturov, as he was called in the Russian army, was an “iron general,” who managed to organize the defense of the Semenovsky heights on time and competently.
At some village, Semenovskoe was in the hands of the enemy, but his attempts to break through the defense of the left flank were not crowned with success. The Life Guards Izmailovsky, Lithuanian and Finnish regiments, supported by the Life Guards of the Artillery Brigade, valiantly repelled the fierce attacks of the enemy, "covering themselves in the sight of the whole army with unfading glory."

The center of the Russian position — the Raevsky battery (the “Big Redoubt”) —was attacked twice by the foot soldiers of Beauharnais and Davout in the first half of the day, but both enemy attacks were repulsed.

In the battles for Utitsky kurgan on the left flank of the corps N.A. The 1 Tuchkov courageously restrained the onslaught of the Polish corps of General Poniatowski, who was trying to bypass the tip of the left flank and enter the rear of the Russian army.

By noon, when the tense situation was created in the center of the Russian position and on its left flank, the Guards Cavalry Corps of Lieutenant-General F.P. Uvarova and parts of the Don Ataman MI Troops Platov on the orders of Kutuzov made a raid on the left flank of the enemy. This sabotage diverted part of Napoleon’s army from the main attacks, providing a temporary respite for the forces of the left flank that were exhausted from the attacks of the enemy.
In the afternoon, the Rayevsky battery again became the epicenter of events. The cavalry of General O. Kolenkura collapsed to the central height and occupied it. Trying to develop success, the enemy attacked the Russian regiments east of the captured battery, behind Ognik stream. But the Russian dragoons and cuirassiers, including the Life Guards Equestrian and Cavalry Guards regiments, overturned the French.



The fighting continued until 9 hours of the evening. In the final part of the battle, Russian artillery distinguished itself, which "silenced the French artillery." By the end of the day on August 26, both armies remained on the battlefield.

The battle of 26 in August 1812 was the bloodiest in the military stories that time. The losses of each side amounted to thousands of people killed, wounded and missing in 40. This day to solve the most important strategic task - Napoleon Bonaparte failed to smash the enemy's army in one general battle. The Russian army was still a formidable force. By order of M.I. Kutuzov early in the morning of August 27, Russian troops began to leave the battlefield in order to rally new forces to drive the enemy out of the homeland.

The emperor Napoleon later recalled: “Of all my battles, the most terrible thing that I gave near Moscow. The French have proved themselves worthy of winning, and the Russians are called invincible. ”

“This day will remain an eternal monument of courage and excellent courage of Russian soldiers, where all the infantry, cavalry and artillery fought desperately. The desire of everyone to die on the spot and not give in to the enemy, ”MI gave such a high assessment to the Russian army on August 26. Kutuzov.
30 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. raf
    +8
    7 September 2011 08: 49
    Even if the opponent recognizes you as invincible, then you are truly invincible! Glorious were the warriors! An example to follow at all times!
    1. ballian
      -4
      7 September 2011 10: 17
      In fact, Napoleon did not say this - this phrase was composed by the then pre-revolutionary Potsreots.
      In his memoirs, Napoleon directly calls the battle of Borodino his victory.
      1. LESHA pancake
        +3
        7 September 2011 10: 26
        AGA THIS NAPALEON IN RUSSIA DEMOCRACY DECIDED TO ESTABLISH OUR VICTORY. DO NOT MIX PEOPLE.
        1. ballian
          -1
          7 September 2011 10: 43
          What "don't you laugh"? The fact that Napoleon in his memoirs called the battle his victory, and the phrase attributed to him - "Of all my battles, the worst thing is that I gave near Moscow. The French showed themselves worthy of winning in it, and the Russians - to be called invincible" - Napoleon does not belong - Is that funny to you?
          .
          But what about the battle - a fact - the French troops captured almost all of the Russian fortifications, displacing the Russian troops from the battlefield - Kutuzov did not dare to continue the battle and retreated - left Moscow to the French - and who won the battle?
          1. LESHA pancake
            +5
            7 September 2011 10: 48
            WHO DOES NOT MATTER AND WHERE HE PUSHED OUT. THE RUSSIAN ARMY DID NOT GIVE UP AND CONTINUED RESISTANCE TO THIS INVASOR. THE TOTAL IS A COMPLETE DESTRUCTION OF THE Crusader Leader.
            1. ballian
              +2
              7 September 2011 11: 40
              It's just that it always surprised me - for example, if Moscow were created in December 41 - would they call the Moscow defensive operation a victory, or a "draw"? - of course not, but the fact that the Russian army withstood and continued the war until victory - no one argues with this.
              1. -1
                8 September 2011 11: 17
                any state, any army at all times even tried to put defeat in a more favorable light. Not to mention such essentially no-man battles. By the way, Napoleon personally whispered to you that he did not say that?
                1. ballian
                  0
                  9 September 2011 07: 37
                  Where did you find the "no-man's" battle there? The army was knocked out of defensive positions, having suffered heavy losses, retreated, and built Moscow.
                  The question about Napoleon - is that what you decided to pare?
          2. +1
            8 September 2011 13: 23
            The one who completed his task won. Napoleon had to defeat the Russian army and thereby force the Russian emperor to capitulate, the Russians, therefore - not to allow it. So draw conclusions.
      2. Sanzyro
        +6
        7 September 2011 10: 28
        And how did it end for him? It is important to win not one battle, but a war! He then pissed off, I apologize for the bad French ...
      3. raf
        +6
        7 September 2011 10: 38
        Even if Napoleon did not say this, the Russian soldiers showed themselves to be excellent warriors! And this is really a good example to follow!
      4. irony
        0
        20 September 2011 22: 36
        Is your surname not Novodvorskaya?
  2. Crazyzy
    0
    7 September 2011 11: 27
    "Should we leave the sacred and ancient capital of Russia without a fight or defend it?" Bennigsen believed that Moscow must be defended without fail. Kutuzov, however, remained alone in his unshakable decision to save the army and in order to leave Moscow without a fight.
    "Having lost Moscow, we will lose the city, having lost the army, we will lose the country"
  3. +3
    7 September 2011 13: 36
    Glory to the Russian soldiers!
  4. +3
    7 September 2011 13: 56
    How much blood our soldiers shed for their homeland, how many examples of courage happened on our land, the elite of the country fought and died. The current elite is not worthy of this name even compared to the past!
  5. dimarm74
    +5
    7 September 2011 14: 29
    ceded to Moscow, a fact, but Moscow was not the capital at that time, and state administration was not lost, so there is nothing wrong with that. Strategically, Kutuzov outplayed Bonaparte one hundred percent ... and this is also a fact.
    Just do not understand why Napoleon is considered great? Shamefully lost the war, which he himself unleashed.
  6. +2
    7 September 2011 14: 49
    As far as I remember the story, it used to be thought that if the enemy left the battlefield, then the one whose troops remained in place defeated. But to be honest, I didn’t read anywhere how long it was necessary to stand there. Napoleon could not win in one general battle. He succeeded throughout Europe. Of course, if Kutuzov hadn’t withdrawn his troops, and accepted the continuation of the battle, it wasn’t a fact that the French would have won. But it seems to me that the great losses during the battle on both sides were more discouraged by the French. I think he was glad that ours had retreated. After such battles, the army needed some time to rest. And Kutuzov simply outplayed him or, in my opinion, changed his mind. Mother Russia is big, there are a lot of places for battle, and if you exhaust the enemy, then you don’t need major battles. In my opinion, the Russians have one not very good quality for the enemies, leaving to destroy almost everything. And the supply of troops in the vast territories of our country is still a problem. oddly enough it is necessary to feed and to feed well. This is only the Russian army can eat what God sent. The truth and combat readiness of it, too, is not very.
    But this battle always provoked and makes me PRIDE for the Russian army and our people. ALL RUSSIA ABOUT BORODIN'S DAY WILL NOT REMEMBER FOR FREE. And not only this battle. By the way, Frederick 2, even in those battles in which he was defeated, always sent news that the victory remained with him. Well, like you won, you’re a goat.
    1. +1
      7 September 2011 16: 08
      Your truth! The war with Russia for the invaders has always turned into something unimaginable. All plans collapsed, the strategy turned into smoke, and the initiative, slowly but surely, passed on to our ancestors.
      They definitely noticed about Friedrich ... He was beaten under Kunnersdorf even under Zorndorf, and he still lied to Europe about his victories over the Russians.
      1. ballian
        -1
        9 September 2011 07: 40
        Under Zorndorf there was a "no-man's" battle, and the Russians suffered much greater losses than the Germans.
        1. -1
          9 September 2011 08: 09
          You here about the "battlefield" at Borodino proved something, so at Zorndorf the battlefield remained with us, by the way. But even without this, Friedrich lost! He was beaten for the first time in front of all of Europe. Moreover, this was done by the Russian soldiers themselves, whose commander, Fermor, fled during the battle! If Europe found out about this, the authority of the Prussian king would be undermined completely. After the battle, the king retreated to Saxony, because Rumyantsev was coming from the north to join Fermor and things were taking a very bad turn for the Prussians, given the phenomenal staunchness of the Russian infantry.

          "Master of the battlefield" is nonsense and show-off, it is important to achieve a specific goal. Napoleon did not achieve it - the defeat of the Russian army.
          1. ballian
            -1
            9 September 2011 22: 59
            Well, what are you talking about - what "beat"? ? Do you understand what kind of battle you are writing about? The battlefield, by the way, remained with the Germans, the Russians retreated back to Pomerania - Frederick did not allow them to capture Berlin. The Russian army lost half of its strength in the battle, the German only a third.
            After the battle, Frederick went after the battle to Saxony to deal with the Austrians.
            And in general, no one (except you!) Did not call Zondorf a Russian victory.
            1. 0
              10 September 2011 08: 04
              It was about the Zorndorf battle that I spoke about. If this was Frederick's victory, then why did he not accept the battle the next day, when our army was waiting for the continuation of the battle? Part of the Russian army, together with the heavily loaded guns and captured prisoners, remained on the battlefield all night - a retired German captain Archengolts writes about this. On August 26, the day after the battle, the king took his army to Tsicher. Taking advantage of the "golden bridge", the Russians bypass its position from the south on the 27th and stop near Gross-Kamina, covered from the side of the Prussians by a swamp. Frederick makes a flank march in front of Fermor's army and sets up a camp at Tamzel. After these dances, the armies remain opposite each other until August 30, the 31st Fermor begins to retreat to Landsberg. Under the supervision of a small corps of the Don, the Russians went beyond the Vistula in September.
              Losses: Russians - 17000, Prussians - 11000. The most efficient troops of Frederick - the "Silesian devils" - suffered such heavy losses that the king did not dare to continue direct hostilities, but preferred to evade the battle. Of course, the cowardly and weak Austrians could not pose a threat. The Russian army has not lost its combat capability. Although the losses were really heavy, I agree.
              Since no one called, I will be the first.
        2. Dovmont
          0
          20 September 2011 22: 08
          Kutuzov used the "Scythian" tactics of luring the enemy deep into his territory and exhausting him with continuous attacks. So more than once our ancestors managed to defeat a stronger enemy.
    2. +2
      7 September 2011 22: 37
      It was necessary to stand for three days. For Russians it was called standing on the bones. And the retreat of the enemy without persecution was called the Golden Bridge.
  7. dimarm74
    +3
    7 September 2011 15: 01
    Well, Napoleon, before climbing into Russia, would ask what kind of country this is ..... and what the weather is like there .... and how he will supply his army .... So there is no excuse for him ... ..none. Kutuzov turned out to be much smarter.
    So Kutuzov to the last did not want to give a general battle, in fact, he was accepted under pressure from the tsar, generals and the public. The old man understood that Bonaparte was strong precisely in the general battle, did not want to ruin the army ahead of time.
    1. +1
      7 September 2011 16: 13
      He was interested. If Bonaparte had carried out an operation to flood Russia with counterfeit money, he had already taken care of military intelligence properly. There was no amateur. Another thing is that this did not help him.
    2. Sanzyro
      +1
      7 September 2011 20: 28
      Do not forget that for that time, Bonaparte had a very large army ...
      1. +2
        7 September 2011 21: 36
        Quote: Sanzyro
        Do not forget that for that time, Bonaparte had a very large army ...

        It was not the largest, but the strongest army in all respects in Europe!
  8. +1
    7 September 2011 18: 40
    I also remember that the Russian army was divided into 2 or 3 parts and until they joined together what kind of battle could be discussed. But there weren’t big battles or clashes between the rear guard and the vanguard of the French. And our ancestors showed, if not Kuz'kin’s mother, then somewhere nearby, delaying and exhausting the French army. Every time it was necessary to deploy army formations for battle. And this time. It is a pity that Mikhail Illarionovich did not live to the day when ours entered Paris.
  9. +5
    7 September 2011 23: 28
    "Tell me, uncle, it's not for nothing."
    Moscow, burned by fire,
    The Frenchman is given away?
    After all, there were fighting fights,
    Yes, they say, even what!
    No wonder the whole of Russia remembers
    About Borodin's day!

    - Yes, there were people in our time,
    Not that the present tribe:
    Bogatyri - not you!
    They got a bad share:
    Few came back from the field ...
    If it were not for the Lord's will,
    They would not give up Moscow!

    We retreated silently for a long time,
    It was a pity, they were waiting for the battle,
    Grumbling old people:
    "What are we going to winter apartments?
    Do not they dare, commanders
    Strangers tear their uniforms
    O Russian bayonets? "

    And then we found a large field:
    There is a clear out where in the wild!
    Have built redoubt.
    Our ears are on the vertex!
    A little morning the guns lit up
    And the forests are blue tops -
    The French are right there.

    I scored a charge in the gun tight
    And I thought: I'll treat a friend!
    Wait, my brother!
    What's there to cunning, perhaps to battle;
    We will go to break the wall,
    We will stand head and shoulders
    For his homeland!

    For two days we were in a shootout.
    What's the use of such a trifle?
    We waited for the third day.
    Everywhere people began to hear speeches:
    "It's time to get to the buckshot!"
    And here on the terrible menacing field
    The shadow fell at night.

    I lay down to take a nap at the carriage,
    And it was heard before dawn,
    How the Frenchman rejoiced.
    But our bivouac was open:
    Whoever shaved the whole shredded,
    Who sharpened the bayonet, grumbling angrily,
    Biting a long mustache.

    And only the sky lit up,
    Everything began to stir noisily,
    Sparkled behind the formation of the formation.
    Our Colonel was born with a grip:
    Servant to the king, father to the soldiers ...
    Yes, I pity him: he is struck down with bulat,
    He sleeps in the ground damp.

    And he said, with his eyes sparkling:
    "Guys! Isn't Moscow behind us?
    Die down near Moscow,
    How our brothers died! "
    And we promised to die,
    And the oath of loyalty was kept
    We are in the battle of Borodino.

    Well there was a day! Through the smoke of the volatile
    The French moved like clouds,
    And all to our redoubt.
    Lancers with motley badges,
    Dragoons with ponytails,
    All flashed before us,
    All have visited here.

    You do not see such battles! ..
    Banners fluttered like shadows,
    In the smoke, the fire shone,
    It sounded like a bulat, sarc bittered,
    The hand of the fighters is tired,
    And the cores were prevented from flying
    Mountain of bloody bodies.

    The enemy had learned a lot that day,
    What does Russian battle mean,
    Our hand-to-hand fighting! ..
    The earth was shaking - like our breasts,
    Mixed in a bunch of horses, people,
    And the volleys of a thousand guns
    Merged in a long howl ...

    It's getting dark. Everybody was ready
    Zautra fight to start a new one
    And stand to the end ...
    Here the drums crackled -
    And the busurans retreated.
    Then we began to count,
    Comrades count.

    Yes, there were people in our time,
    A powerful, dashing tribe:
    Bogatyri - not you.
    They got a bad share:
    Few came back from the field.
    If it were not for God's will,
    They would not give up Moscow!
  10. Priest
    0
    12 September 2011 22: 38
    Heroes are not us. (Belief in a good tsar) - either the inheritance of the Russian people, or whether the climate affects.