Under the Tula are tested new BTR-MDM

50
At the Slobodka 106 training ground, the divisions of the Airborne Forces, located near Tula, began factory and military testing of the BTR-MDM Rakushka, which will replace the BTR-D, which has been in service since 1974.

Under the Tula are tested new BTR-MDM


“In the course of army-controlled operation, regular crews of subunits, under the control of representatives of the manufacturer’s factory, are testing the latest technology in conditions close to combat ones. This will allow the paratroopers to maximally assess the capabilities of combat vehicles before launching them into mass production, ”quotes the representative of the press service and information department of the Russian Defense Ministry for the Airborne Forces, Lieutenant Colonel Yevgeny Meshkov. "Russian newspaper".

In tests at the site of the Tula division involved 8 machines.

“In essence, the only thing that remains with the old technique is the presence of two machine guns. And then - one machine gun remained the same with a radius of fire just 30 degrees, and the second is now installed on the armor and can spin on all 360. (...) Besides, now you can shoot, without getting up from your seats - electronics are almost like on airplanes, ”the journalist notes. "Rossiyskaya Gazeta"who watched the test.

New armored personnel carriers will be supplied not only to the Airborne Forces, but also to anti-aircraft missile and anti-tank batteries, for which they will be equipped with the appropriate weapons.

“The weight of the machine is a new model 13 tons, the old - 8. On the new engine stands horsepower 500, on the old 240. The speed of this car 70 kilometers an hour on the highway, afloat - up to 10 kilometers per hour ", - said the senior officer of the armored service Vitaly Selishchev.

Tests of the new machine will go until July 2015. However, according to the paratroopers, it is possible that the prototypes will appear on the anniversary parade of Victory.
50 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    16 December 2014 10: 04
    Judging by the photo, the loading and unloading of the crew and the landing can be problematic on the go ... but the rest is good news
    1. +4
      16 December 2014 10: 06
      Let's hope that the new technology will satisfy all the requirements of the military.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +4
      16 December 2014 10: 07
      Yes you are right. I would add some folding ladder. Well, or the steps welded on the edge. It costs a little, but how much benefit would be!
      1. Viktor Kudinov
        +2
        16 December 2014 10: 12
        It’s good that the second machine gun can control the entire horizon. good
        1. +2
          16 December 2014 10: 20
          The paratroopers are certainly more visible, but the photo is more similar and looks like a replacement for MTLBU.
      2. +5
        16 December 2014 10: 21
        that’s why they are tested so that they can make constructive improvements based on their results.
      3. +13
        16 December 2014 10: 21
        BTR-MD "Shell" (GBTU Index - Object 955) - Russian amphibious armored personnel carrier. Created in the design office of the Volgograd Tractor Plant. Sometimes unofficially called BTR-D-3, BTRD-3.
        The armored personnel carrier "Object 955" was created on the basis of the BMD-4 airborne combat vehicle. The main purpose of the armored personnel carrier is to replace the BTR-D troops. Dimensions and weight of the machine provide air transport and rapid overcoming of water barriers.
        Tactical and technical characteristics of the BTR-MD ("Object 955")
        Crew + assault, cel 2 + 15
        Carrying capacity, kg 2000
        Air transportation - by IL-76 type (M, MD), An-22, An-124, Mi-26 helicopter
        Parachute landing with IL-76 (M, MD), An-22, An-124 airplanes
        Landing with the machine, cel 3
        Combat weight, t 13,2
        Armament:
        - machine gun, number x caliber, brand - 1х7,62-mm, PKT
        - installations for assault weapons - Course for 5,45-mm machine gun РПКС74, two airborne and aft for 5,45-mm machine gun АКС74
        Engine:
        - Four-stroke diesel with turbo power, 2В-06-2
        - number of cylinders, cooling - 6, liquid
        - power 450 hp (at 2000 rpm)
        Transmission - Hydromechanical, with differential turning mechanism, with hydrostatic transmission
        Water jet, type - Hydrojet
        Maximum movement speed;
        - on the highway, km / h 71
        - afloat, km / h 10,5
        Average speed on a dry dirt road, km / h 45-50

        1. Timur
          +1
          16 December 2014 13: 21
          It does not look so hot. not pleasing to the eye. used to be more aesthetically designed.
        2. 0
          16 December 2014 13: 39
          Something from this angle, the good old M113 recalls. smile

          By the way, if they had not cut the stern, they could have installed the ramp. But then it would definitely be M113.
          1. +1
            16 December 2014 14: 05
            With all the seeming flaws, the car should be good.
          2. The comment was deleted.
    4. +12
      16 December 2014 10: 37
      It is immediately clear that none of the commentators served in the Airborne Forces))

      This is a loading and disembarkation system traditional for all BMDs - disembarkation, disembarkation occurs when driving in first gear) 0

      How do you tell me
    5. +2
      16 December 2014 13: 31
      Loading and unloading remained at the BTRD level, that is, the same inconvenient. In order to climb. you must jump to a meter high (this is the cover of the engine compartment).
      A simple BTRD was taken, the ceiling was raised slightly (that is, the height of the silhouette increased) and electronics with an unknown working capacity were crammed.
      Interestingly, the reservation remained from magnesium alloys, or steel was added
    6. +7
      16 December 2014 13: 33
      Quote: LevITon
      loading and unloading of crew and landing can be problematic on the go ...

      On the old BMD / BTR-D, the principle of landing and disembarkation was the same ... not used to it. On the aft sheet is the mounting bracket of the CSB (center. Power unit) for landing, relying on it - in one fell swoop Yes
      Quote: LevITon
      Yes you are right. I would add some folding ladder. Well, or the steps welded on the edge. It costs a little, but how much benefit would be!

      An extra protruding part can sometimes cause a parachute crash. There can be no compromise - the car in the air, when it is separated from the plane, first goes nose down, the details of the parachute system are not yet stretched ... the hook - and the car crashed. On our coveralls, even all the buttons were hidden, the trouser legs were inside the boots, the trunk of the machine with the protruding front sight was hidden in a bag for shops, nothing more, there should be no reason to hook.
      An unpleasant feature of the BMD-1/2 was the tendency to swing the car on the move, this was facilitated by the layout and soft hydropneumatic suspension. The BTR-D had a 6-roller base, was more confident in this regard, but also tougher. Judging by the video, "Shell" runs through potholes without swinging and does not bite.
      Jacking (2)

      Loading and unloading remained at the BTRD level, that is, the same inconvenient. In order to climb. you must jump to a meter high (this is the cover of the engine compartment).

      Do not scare people stop the training technique for landing in BMD and BTR-D does not provide for any dizzying tricks laughing
  2. +6
    16 December 2014 10: 08
    These tests have already been shown on TV: the landing party is really happy. Well, if they like it, then even more so!
    As for the short flight of stairs: I think there will be other wishes - this is a test, no matter how.
  3. +2
    16 December 2014 10: 08
    Have a good test! And a big series. The main thing that the car did not fail!
  4. +2
    16 December 2014 10: 10
    Oh, to run them somewhere in the Donetsk region, that would be a test.
    But for the news, thanks. Good luck.
  5. +2
    16 December 2014 10: 10
    "Shell" is intended to replace the BTR-D in the airborne troops, which was put into service in 1974. The armored personnel carrier was created on the basis of the BMD-4 airborne assault vehicle, capable of landing from an aircraft and swimming, adapted for the evacuation of the wounded. The BTR-MD holds 13 paratroopers and is armed with two 7,62 mm machine guns. The crew is two people.
  6. FACKtoREAL
    +4
    16 December 2014 10: 11
    I do not like this caterpillar canned box with protection against a bayonet knife ..
    What about the all-army platform unification?
    1. Jovanny
      0
      16 December 2014 10: 25
      I'm shocked too .. nafik armor without a gun? any Khattab will approach it with a 400 meters granotometr
      1. +3
        16 December 2014 10: 39
        Prefer to ride in tented shishigami?

        I can arrange)))
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. +2
        16 December 2014 10: 59
        In Afghanistan, various systems were attached to the equipment all in place, while serial equipment did not have a high degree of barrel lift. We didn’t think that we would fight in the mountains.
        1. +1
          16 December 2014 11: 40
          On MTLB better Zushka sits))
    2. +2
      16 December 2014 11: 16
      Quote: FACKtoREAL
      How about the all-army unification of platforms ?
      For the Airborne Forces, this is the platform - BMD-4M, SPRUT-SD (unified with BMD-4M) plus BTR-MDM Rakushka (on the basis of Rakushka it is possible to make carriers of ATGM or light anti-aircraft missile systems). Actually, the T-72 / T-90 chassis has also been used for as long as a platform for a whole family of combat vehicles. For six years, they could produce the T-95 and use its base in the same way, instead of "saving" and creating a single "platform" called "Armata", which entailed a loss of time, huge costs for new development and deterioration of characteristics, due to cramming conflicting requirements in one component. As for the "tin box", yes, it is not "Mouse", which, however, would rather get knocked out than this "tin box".
    3. +1
      16 December 2014 13: 15
      Quote: FACKtoREAL
      I do not like this caterpillar canned box with protection against a bayonet knife ..

      And in vain ... laughing good car! Very necessary good
  7. +1
    16 December 2014 10: 14
    It’s difficult to say something from the photo, God forbid, that this technique glorify Russian weapons.
  8. +2
    16 December 2014 10: 15
    However, according to the paratroopers, it is possible that prototypes will appear at the anniversary Victory Parade.
    I already can’t wait for the parade of this! They have already promised so many new products starting from Almaty and BTR-MDM and other latest technology. No matter how it was another window dress. They rivet a couple of copies for the parade and then, with a clear conscience, these projects are wrapped. Of course I would like to believe in the best.
    1. octopus52
      0
      16 December 2014 14: 00
      BTR-MDM is a modification of the same shell in a medical machine up to the modern operating room at the forefront
  9. 0
    16 December 2014 10: 16
    Something too much fighters are vulnerable to shelling, during "embarkation and disembarkation"
    1. Jovanny
      0
      16 December 2014 10: 27
      that's for sure, you need to go up there, so their sniper will be removed without problems. (the entrance must be done below. But you see there this thing should float, maybe for tightness therefore the entrance is high
      1. 0
        17 December 2014 17: 54
        BMP also floats, but her landing is much more convenient.
  10. +1
    16 December 2014 10: 20
    It will not be easy to screw a wounded man into it, even if it is possible - then there is nowhere to put, the landing seats there are across, like in a Gazelle. About 8-9 years ago, I had the "pleasure" to get to know these "new military-industrial complex" closely, although then BMD-4 and Rakushka had a chassis and an engine compartment from Volgograd.
    1. octopus52
      0
      16 December 2014 14: 04
      6 stretchers on the sides and 1 in the middle in the BTRM model for the removal of wounded from military operations
      1. 0
        16 December 2014 21: 09
        "model btrdm for the removal of the wounded from combat operations" ????

        Right! And it will be reset by parachutes with the main machines))))

        In general, as far as I remember, the shell section of the assault force - it is not clear where to place the "6 stretchers on the sides" there.
  11. +2
    16 December 2014 10: 26
    Of course, I apologize for the children's question, but what are the tasks of this machine? It seems we have an armored personnel carrier and infantry fighting vehicles. And judging by the photo, the side armor plates in the entrance area would not be in the way.
    1. INFOLegioner
      -2
      16 December 2014 12: 17
      Judging by the weight and size - this pepelats is ONLY designed to be ONLY for very quick transfer to the airport and discharge from airplanes. On this, his advantages end and blood pressure begins for the fighters - in the form of cardboard armor and a pair of machine guns in the form of weapons. Unfortunately, he apparently continues the tradition of cheapness in the life of a Russian soldier. Such an impression
      1. +4
        16 December 2014 13: 30
        It's not about the cheapness of a soldier's life. The Airborne Forces are actually "golden" troops.

        This pepelats continues the tradition of airborne airborne vehicles. And in hard MGH parachute throwing normal armor and weapons to push it is almost impossible.
        At the same time, the question "and how to parachute in general in the current conditions and do we really need airborne descent"for some reason not worth it.

        Even in Soviet times, subject to the mobilization of GA aircraft, the VTA provided airborne assault landing operations, the EMNIP, and only one VDD with standard weapons and equipment. This required complete dominance in the air in the landing zone and on the way to it + suppression of air defense on the route and in the zone. Given the spread of MANPADS and other mucks, providing the latter is now hardly possible.
        Yes, and the Airborne Forces are now mainly used in the airborne manner. The maximum is the parachute throw of advanced light parts, and then the transfer of the bulk of the equipment in a landing way. Moreover, to strengthen parts of the Airborne Forces, they even had to give army armored vehicles.
        And why do we need airborne landing forces of the Airborne Forces? Isn’t it easier to equip the landing forces with more protected army infantry fighting vehicles and armored personnel carriers, which cannot be dropped, but can be transported by air. Moreover, some of the airborne units are already riding on army equipment.
      2. +2
        16 December 2014 14: 02
        Quote: INFOLegioner
        ONLY ONLY for a very quick transfer to the airfield and reset from aircraft

        This is a transporter !!! His task is transportation. Ammunition, grub, water, wounded, junk ... this is not a front line machine. This is a technical closure machine, this is a machine of a battalion doctor, anti-aircraft gunners ...
        Quote: INFOLegioner
        Unfortunately, he apparently continues the tradition of cheapness in the life of a Russian soldier.

        Don't talk bullshit
      3. 0
        17 December 2014 18: 00
        In principle, I agree - during the service it was fun to throw a piece of armor from the BMD and watch. how it burns (with a bright white flame that cuts your eyes. water cannot be extinguished).
        the armor provides bulletproof (7,62 or 5,45mm) protection against AK, but not from SVD or PC (board). God forbid RPG - it will burn in a minute.
  12. 0
    16 December 2014 10: 30
    Quote: GEMODOT
    About 8-9 years ago, I had the "pleasure" to get to know these "new military-industrial complex" closely, although then BMD-4 and Rakushka had a chassis and an engine compartment from Volgograd.


    It’s anyway better than the old model of 74 years. The tests are designed to identify and refine all the nuances. I don’t think that such an important aspect as loading / transporting / unloading a wounded person will be ignored.
    1. 0
      16 December 2014 10: 47
      Then some military men said - "they are forcing us to give birth to a hedgehog," no one wanted to take a sin on their souls and take it into service (then they were pushing the BTR-90 in parallel). Right now, the campaign has changed and those times have changed, and everyone is delighted with these devices.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  13. +1
    16 December 2014 10: 35
    It would be nice to foresee and have extra reservation kits. I think that this technique will not always perform the specific tasks of the Airborne Forces. war home.
  14. 0
    16 December 2014 10: 55
    Why is this car needed at all if there is a BMD? Cheap?
  15. 0
    16 December 2014 11: 06
    The old army and landing principle remains the main one - in cramped conditions, but not in insult. If, according to the performance characteristics, 15 people in equipment climb into the compartment, then it will be hot. Although the airborne squad - 7 people. In a word, it is not yet clear from the outside what and how.
  16. 0
    16 December 2014 11: 08
    yes, that made me think with a back gate
  17. 0
    16 December 2014 11: 28
    A workhorse, and even with additional power and the possibility of a platform in a line: a conveyor for delivering ammunition, wounded, manpower to the battlefield, installing anti-tank and anti-aircraft weapons, tractors, communication vehicles, commander’s, etc. etc. You need a lot of different, relatively inexpensive and powerful transport platforms for many varieties. These vehicles, like armored personnel carriers, are not intended for the first line. And for a shishig tent, there’s nowhere to take it, and why not ...
  18. +1
    16 December 2014 11: 43
    Someone can explain why, on this know-how, it is impossible to place machine guns in the stern.
    Given that the machine gun has a circular view in the bow, and the placement height, a large dead zone appears behind the stern. In this case, when one of the enemy is in the dead zone, leaving it will not be pleasant. Only if you twist the stern.
    Who is familiar with this explain. To increase horizons.
    hi
  19. 0
    16 December 2014 12: 11
    There is only one complaint to the shell - the convenience of landing. It was worth considering the option with side hatches.
    1. Vovan - prison
      +1
      16 December 2014 14: 23
      Surely they will finish later! Without side inputs and outputs, it’s also not ice! The same time (loading-unloading) landing-disembarkation is reduced by landing! Which is also of great importance in battle! soldier
  20. 0
    16 December 2014 12: 11
    And so - a worthy replacement for the BTR-D
  21. 0
    16 December 2014 12: 51
    Tests of the new machine will go until July 2015. However, according to the paratroopers, it is possible that the prototypes will appear on the anniversary parade of Victory.
    Of course I would like to quickly, these machines are needed already yesterday!
  22. 0
    16 December 2014 13: 33
    Where is the complex of additional active and passive protection of the crew ...?
  23. +1
    17 December 2014 11: 43
    Quote: Timur
    It does not look so hot. not pleasing to the eye. used to be more aesthetically designed.

    I agree. I also don’t really like the view, the good old BTR-D is much more beautiful and the view is swift! At one time I rolled on the BTR-D soldier
  24. The comment was deleted.