Russia's image suffered in the wake of the “Arab Spring”

13
Russia's image suffered in the wake of the “Arab Spring” While the Gaddafi regime is writhing in death-cramps, the rebels, who have become the new owners of Tripoli, promise that the contracts signed under Gaddafi will not be revised, but Russia's reputation as a reliable partner has been dampened. The Kremlin’s forced consent to a NATO-organized regime change and the introduction of an arms embargo on Libya in the eyes of the Arab world discredited Russia as a reliable supplier.

“This is irreversible ... You can forget about Russia's reputation as a reliable supplier of weapons. Its reputation has been damaged not only in the Middle East, but throughout the world, ”said the director of the Center for Analysis of Strategies and Technologies Ruslan Pukhov.

A permanent clientele of the Russian defense industry will now probably turn away from it and turn to China, which has evaded support for NATO actions, adds Pukhov.

In addition to Libya, Russia has serious business interests in other Arab countries, so the Kremlin’s reaction to the snowball events of the Arab Spring is being watched very carefully. This, in particular, is true of Syria, where President Bashar Assad brutally suppressed the protests, of which about two thousand people became victims.

The US has already imposed sanctions on Syria, and the European Union is likely to impose an embargo on the import of Syrian oil next week. Oil exports to Syria give about a third of Syrian revenues.

If Tunisia and Egypt - whose governments were the first to fall during the events of the “Arab Spring” - were economically of little interest to Russia, then Syria is very important.

According to the Moscow Defense Brief magazine, the total value of existing contracts for the supply of Damascus weapons and military equipment significantly exceeds 4 billion dollars, while it is simply impossible to accurately estimate the volume of at least five main contracts.

In the Russian-Syrian business council, headed by Dmitry Pumpyansky, the head of the producer of steel pipes of the Pipe Metallurgical Company (TMK), refused to comment on The Moscow Times. Among other member companies of the Council with significant interests in Syria are oil-producing Tatneft, gas Itera and the national air carrier Aeroflot.

When asked about the possibility of imposing an international arms embargo on Syria, the head of Rosoboronexport last week declared that Russia was “obliged” to fulfill all agreements with this country. However, if the “Arab Spring” overwhelms Syria, all business agreements will lose force.

Libya’s western neighbor, Algeria, which had no significant popular unrest, along with Syria, is one of the five main importers of Russian military products and is also a vital customer for the MTC.

Under Gaddafi, Russian business interests were very significant and suffered as a result of the civil war.

Russia's participation in the arms embargo against Libya, introduced at the initial stage of events in this country, cost 4 billion dollars, the Rosoboronexport state intermediary for military-technical cooperation said at the time.

Railways built a railway branch in Libya under a contract worth 3,1 billion dollars, while oil and gas companies invested millions in exploration. Gazpromneft’s oil subsidiary, Gazpromneft, was going to acquire, along with Italian Eni, for 170 million dollars a stake in the Elephant oil field just before the massacre. The document was never signed.

Supporting the rebels, the Russian business could hope for more bright prospects in Libya. The Transitional National Council (PNS) insists that all contracts signed with Gaddafi will remain in force.

“Due respect will be shown to all legal contracts,” Ahmed Jehani, who is responsible for rebuilding the infrastructure, told Reuters on Tuesday. "The issue of contract revision is not worth it."

Russian companies even declared that they were ready to return to work in Libya after the end of the fighting.

Eurasia Drilling Company, one of the largest Russian drilling companies, said on Tuesday that it intends to return to the Libyan market with the onset of stability in the country, reported Bloomberg.

However, the support provided by the Kremlin to the rebels - hesitant, doubting, retarded - did not win much sympathy in the PNS. Many representatives of business and analysts believe that this kind of weak enthusiasm will lead to Russia's defeat in the competition with the West for business opportunities in Libya after Gaddafi.

Reuters quoted the words of the representative of the rebel oil company AGOCO Abdeldzhalil Mayuf, who said at the beginning of the week: “With the West - Italian, French and British companies - there is not the slightest problem. But political friction with Russia, China and Brazil is possible. ”

The Russian ambassador in Tripoli, who was dismissed in March, said at the time that Russian interests in Libya were "betrayed."

Considering the threats to the economic ties between Russia and the new Libya and the eroded confidence in Russia in bilateral relations with other Arab countries, some analysts speak of a general decline in Russia's prestige in the region.

“We are losing the Middle East,” said Viktor Mizin, deputy head of the Independent Institute for Strategic Assessments.
13 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. zczczc
    +1
    28 August 2011 17: 05
    Because one needs to be supported. You can’t rush around and catch up with the situation - either Gaddafi, then the rebels. This position is not serious.
    1. LESHA pancake
      -3
      28 August 2011 17: 19
      THE CONSECUTIVE NEED TO BE, IN THIS YOU CAN LEARN FROM CHINA.
  2. 0
    28 August 2011 18: 26
    And, actually, what they wanted? For political prostitution will have to pay four times against the usual. Hopefully, having gotten a kick in my pocket, our importing exporters will get together with a big Kahal and explain to the lady that it’s not worth depriving them of money ... The good will not end. Though so, you know ...
  3. 0
    28 August 2011 18: 48
    We are constantly stepping on the same rake. Our highly respected tandem is not always consistent in making this or that decision. And practical actions directly according to Vladimir Lenin are a step forward, two steps back. we suffer not only economic, but also political losses, and these friends, who are not friends at all, are absolutely unreliable. When we learn to look a few steps ahead, Russia's prestige decreases. We are becoming not entirely reliable partners. And this is fraught.
    1. Mesniy
      -3
      28 August 2011 22: 42
      The trouble is that we just do not go in the wake of the United States and NATO, and attempts are made to play in a superpower. It is ridiculous and expensive, but the main thing is stupid and not realistic.
  4. voin-xnumx
    -1
    28 August 2011 19: 18
    As our helmsmen behave in foreign policy, one cannot behave uniquely. We have no priorities and our interests, everything is going by gravity. We lose bundles of friends and just comrades, potential partners turn away. As if not to stay with a broken trough and with a naked jo ... th.
  5. cVM
    cVM
    -4
    28 August 2011 19: 27
    “We are losing the Middle East,” said Viktor Mizin, deputy head of the Independent Institute for Strategic Assessments.


    We lost it long ago, thanks to Israel in 1967 under the USSR
    1. Mesniy
      -3
      28 August 2011 22: 43
      That's for sure!
  6. +1
    28 August 2011 20: 16
    As there is no foreign, so there is no domestic policy. One uncertainty ...
  7. +1
    28 August 2011 22: 12
    I think our authorities took into account the lesson of deception, the West interprets any resolution as it wants, the UN is no longer authoritative, and it is clear who it will support in conflicts. It is impossible to go in the wake of Western policy, it is false and is based entirely on that.
  8. Marat
    +3
    29 August 2011 00: 53
    Quote Mesniy "The trouble is that we just don't follow the channel of the USA and NATO."

    Again, a dangerous informational stuffing - it seems just troll hooliganism - but in fact this "topic" has some kind of popularity, unfortunately (as well as the topic that there were "queues and shortages - and everything is bad" in the USSR)

    Figvam already said everything correctly - but I want to fully disclose the topic - to surrender and "they will pity us and live together without enmity" this is the approach of naive people of the generation that broke up the USSR - to my surprise I still hear in everyday life sometimes

    If "surrender" and "walk in the fairway" it means financial slavery - the stabilization fund is not just in America - it does not exist at all (as under Yeltsin), representatives of the Rothschilds and other clans (such as Khodorkovsky, etc.) rule and funds pass by the people past the defense (and why now defense? - we are all already - in the fairway) completely past the people - the game of "Putin" is over
    Borders are "open" and finances are blown out according to Parshev's model A completely

    Friendship and surrender to the mercy of the Pendos promise all the peoples of Russia death and degeneration - not because the Pendos do not particularly like them (although this moment is also present), but because the climate and geography of the earth that determine geopolitics are arranged this way - and we were born on this territory - I think that Andrey Parshev is 100% right here (his books "why Russia is not America" ​​and "Why America is coming")
    That is why (as our old people say) they are for us the "Big Shaitan"
  9. +2
    29 August 2011 11: 54
    The question of why almost all the people saw the fallacy of such a step as the support of the UN and INATO by Russia, and the Government, you see, did not see.
    Screwed up both politically and economically. But NATO has shown its filthy evil face ... they’re not afraid of anything ... the bastards .. (sorry for my literary)
    We urgently need to sell weapons to Syria, albeit retroactively, albeit in secret, even at night ... our opponents do not shy away from the choice of means.
    The step with Venezuela is correct, but as if ours hadn’t let everyone down again at the last minute. It is necessary to create an alliance, and not only within the borders of the CIS, against such opponents the world community, Cuba, Venezuela and other socialist countries are needed. of the world. I would not hurry with China. Somehow their sharp economic growth is annoying. How would the secret of the Chinese economy. growth was not the little secret of the Rothschilds, who carry contributions from the Amer.
  10. +1
    29 August 2011 12: 02
    Quote: solodova
    The question of why almost all the people saw the fallacy of such a step as the support of the UN and INATO by Russia, and the Government, you see, did not see.


    And they, apparently, were very busy with others: the Popular Front was raised. The elections are not far off, the bucket is full of shit, and in the narodf too, every kind of shit climbs (like Babakov from the CP), and the boxes are there, and obviously you can’t forge all the ballots, but you still want to take the chair, you haven’t taken everything and sold it. ..

    As one satirist used to say, "What the fuck is borscht when such things are in the kitchen?"
    What the fuck is Libya, when here they are elections!
    1. +1
      29 August 2011 12: 09
      War is war and lunch is on schedule! )))
      Maybe their own pockets were stuffed in this case. His own pocket is closer than the official one.
      Oh, how I want to think that they see everything, they know everything, we alone (the people) are unreasonable, and we think bad things about them ...
      It sometimes seems to me that our government is doing everything to ensure that we are convinced that capitalism is not ours. Maybe this is a move, such as a vaccine for capitalism? ))) I laugh myself, then Putin is the hero of the nation - sacrificing the country by saving his good name! ))))))))
      1. ballian
        -1
        29 August 2011 12: 58
        Then China was mentioned - well, so - they had no less interests in Gaddafi in Libya - and they voted in the UN as well as Russia ..
        Gaddafi did not give any preferences to other countries. He gave the civil contracts mentioned here to Russia in EXCHANGE for the forgiveness of Soviet debts and at the same amount :) The nobody is going to review the contracts.
        And the sale of our weapons to Libya (I suspect that Gaddafi didn’t really earn much here either) is also not clear.
        ++++++++++++++
        As for Syria - Russia does not create it - so there are screams about nothing.