Independent Ukraine: 20 years on the path of crisis and collapse

21
Independent Ukraine: 20 years on the path of crisis and collapseModern Ukraine was created as a result of Bolshevik and earlier Austro-Hungarian propaganda.

What, son, help you your Poles?
N.V. Gogol, "Taras Bulba"

Yesterday, Ukraine celebrated 20 years since gaining “independence.” 24 August 1991, it was proclaimed by the Supreme Council of the Republic. Since then, Ukraine has come a long way. Let's be frank: it was a way of crisis and collapse. As part of the USSR, Ukraine was the most powerful and influential republic. It's no joke, 50 million people lived in it! Ukraine had a huge industrial potential. She was called the breadbasket of the USSR, for she also had a highly developed agriculture.

Immigrants from Ukraine occupied a leading position in the leadership of the USSR in the period after Stalin's death. This was explained both by the structure of the CPSU, which ruled the Soviet Union, and by the power of Ukraine as a republic. As a Soviet republic, Ukraine had its own Communist Party - the Communist Party of Ukraine, headed by the first secretary. Russia, the only republic stronger than Ukraine, did not have its own Communist Party, its regions were directly subordinate to the CPSU Central Committee. As a result, the Central Committee of the Communist Party, of course, had more influence than the Moscow City Committee: after all, only 8 million people lived in Moscow against the 50 million in Ukraine. The Russian regions, taken separately, were weaker than Ukraine.

If in the initial period of Soviet power the Jews had a significant influence on state power, then after Stalin’s death, it passed to the Ukrainians and immigrants from Ukraine. Do not believe?

Nikita Sergeevich Khrushchev, first secretary of the Central Committee of the CPSU from 1953 to 1964, was for a long time the first secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Ukraine (1938 - March 1947, December 1947 - 1949). Even after moving to Moscow in 1949, he, as secretary of the Central Committee, continued to “monitor” Ukraine.

His successor was Leonid Ilyich Brezhnev, who also worked for many years in Ukraine as the first secretary of the Dnipropetrovsk regional committee of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Ukraine. The closest associate of Brezhnev was Nikolai Podgorny. In 1965-1977 he served as the formal head of the Soviet state — chairman of the presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR. In 1957-1963 Podgorny was the first secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Ukraine, in other words, he also came from Ukraine.

1953 to 1982 The highest posts in the Soviet state were occupied by people very closely connected with Ukraine. The first secretaries of the Ukrainian Communist Party were also honored and enjoyed considerable influence. As a rule, they were part of the Politburo of the Central Committee of the CPSU. For example, a member of the Politburo was Peter Shelest, the first secretary of the Communist Party Central Committee in 1963-1972. Vladimir Scherbitsky, who replaced him in this post, was not only a member of the Politburo, but was also considered at the beginning of the 1980s. as one of the possible successors of Leonid Brezhnev as general secretary of the CPSU Central Committee.

As we see, under the late Soviet regime, Ukraine lived well. Rather, even good. For example, the standard of living in Ukraine was higher than in Russia, and everyone knew that. Of course, Ukraine did not live as well as the republics of Transcaucasia showered with Soviet money, but, nevertheless, it was “cooler” than Russia.

What happened over the past 20 years? Ukraine went the same way as all the republics of the former USSR. And, like them, she did not find anything good on the path of independence. Industrial potential lost. Agriculture is in decline. The population has declined from 50 million to 45 million people, and its number continues to fall. Moreover, in terms of per capita GDP, Ukraine has overtaken China. Yes, according to the latest data, in China, $ 7519 is accounted for a person, and in Ukraine only $ 6712 is accounted for. And despite the fact that the population of China is 1,3 billion people, in other words, it surpasses the Ukrainian one almost 29 times.

The economic decline and population decline led Ukraine to the loss of the status of a major European power, which it had 20 years ago. Indeed, at the time of independence, the Ukrainians had a “weight category” comparable to France, Italy, and Britain. These countries also had more than 50 million of population, and now they even crossed over 60 million. But the Ukrainian population was declining. And now, given the weakness of the economy, Ukraine is in the same weight category with Poland (38 million people) and even Romania (21 million). In any case, the Romanians, taking advantage of the favorable position of the European structures, are trying to rob the Ukrainians of Snake Island, which occupies a strategic position near the Danube Delta. 20 years ago it was impossible to conceive of this.

In short, Ukraine is stuck in the quagmire of independence, so much so that the tractor does not pull out. The powerful European power, as it was at the beginning of 90's, turned into a decrepit and weak “post-Soviet country”. However, it was good. At the beginning of the “zero” years, the Ukrainian economy showed high rates of economic growth. She grew at an average of 7% per year. But unstable progress “slammed” the “orange revolution”. Confusion in the government led to a halt in development. Now Ukraine’s GDP is only 65% of the year available in 1990. In other words, Ukrainians still cannot recover 35% of their economy.

Independent Ukraine has nothing to brag about: it never surpassed Soviet Ukraine. No wonder. Ukrainians still have not explained even to themselves why they need independence. The only intelligible ideological slogan was put forward by former President Kuchma: "Ukraine is not Russia." Well, Ukraine has already 20 years as not Russia, but where is happiness? Happiness is not and is not expected. Modern Ukraine was created as a result of Bolshevik, and earlier Austro-Hungarian propaganda, which sought to weaken the Russian people from its Little Russian branch in order to weaken the Russian people. The project was a success. And now this branch is rushing in a turbulent flow storiesbeing unable to influence her.

Of course, the highest chic for the Western powers would be to embroil Ukraine and Russia to death, so much so that they bring the matter to war. Such technologies are well known. The British managed to divide India into India and Pakistan proper, after which the two states fought several times, washing themselves with blood, to the delight of the colonialists. The situation is similar in relations between Jews and Arabs. So a war between Russians and Ukrainians would be a great joy for the Western powers. But even Yushchenko could not arrange it, although, of course, he really wanted to.

And today, the rotten Ukrainian propaganda still works to demonize the Russians, falsely claiming that the Russians are not Slavs at all, but for some reason Finno-Ugrians. The propaganda used to say that the Russians were Mongol-Tatars. Now, for some reason, she no longer actively lies about this. Perhaps because the Russians are not at all like the Crimean Tatars living in Crimea.

In short, after Ukraine was created and used against the Russians, no one needed it and hung in the air, where it hangs safely for the last 20 years. Because, together with Russia, Ukraine is a force that was reckoned with throughout the world. And separately, Ukraine is simply “Nenka Square”, which systematically receives kicks from Romania. If Ukrainians continue to think in the same way, then people will forget where Kiev is.

While the Ukrainian project should be considered unsuccessful. Part of Russian torture and the "famine" forced to declare themselves "Ukrainians". But after they did it, it turned out that, from the point of view of the “big western guys,” Ukraine is, at best, a prefix to Poland, and they will not take it to the Western world. So sadly ended at the moment the history of Ukrainian Russophobia and the war against Russia.

"And Karabas-Barabas remained sitting in a puddle in the rain." Ukraine is sitting in the same pool, and the end of the rain is not visible ...
21 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. jamert
    -3
    26 August 2011 20: 29
    And how does Ukraine differ from Russia in this aspect? You, gentlemen, must have had a lot of prosperity and "raising the knees?"
    1. -4
      26 August 2011 21: 13
      Yes, especially nothing but sizes. Therefore, Ukraine has less stolen potential, less time left ...

      Look, there are many articles on VO about the "negative" in the Russian Federation.
      For example:
      http://topwar.ru/6315-lider-rossiyskoy-kompartii-predrekaet-rf-sudbu-sssr.html
      http://topwar.ru/6271-o-suschnosti-rossiyskoy-vlasti.html
      http://topwar.ru/5397-etnicheskaya-voyna-protiv-russkogo-i-drugih-korennyh-narod
      ov-rf.html
      http://topwar.ru/5199-problema-migracii-kak-ugroza-nacionalnoy-bezopasnosti-ross
      ii.html
      http://topwar.ru/6148-nacionalnaya-ugroza-rossii-ee-tehnologicheskaya-bezopasnos
      t.html
      ...
      1. zczczc
        0
        26 August 2011 22: 51
        We also need more time for restoration. The mobility of Ukraine, of course, is higher.
    2. His
      +3
      27 August 2011 13: 29
      Russia is a great power, it is eternal. She is older than usa, england
  2. 0
    26 August 2011 23: 20
    And you can’t argue. Simple people didn’t want to separate ... This is all bureaucratic shit between the profits ... And now don’t understand what’s going on ... then they’re sharing the gas, then the radicals won’t calm down ...
    1. Sobibor
      0
      27 August 2011 00: 05
      And here they say about you: "Fuck knows what is going on in Russia - sometimes Caucasians slaughter Russians, then vice versa."
    2. Superduck
      -3
      27 August 2011 11: 25
      Quote: Max79
      .Simple people did not want to separate ...

      90% voted for secession, it is a fact
  3. 0
    27 August 2011 11: 35
    Superduck, We, too, at one time voted for EBN, for democracy, and when we got it, the majority are now in shit ... Draw conclusions ...
  4. SAVA
    +5
    27 August 2011 12: 02
    And NOW ONLY BIT AND PAIN WE ARE SAME LIKE AND THE INDIANS HAVE LOST THEIR COUNTRY, FOR BEADS AND MIRRORS ((
    1. +4
      27 August 2011 12: 14
      SAVACorrectly compared! I agree!
      1. SAVA
        +2
        27 August 2011 12: 26
        THEREFORE, IF THERE WILL BE A CHANCE TO CREATE A NEW UNION, THERE WILL BE NOT ONLY GOOD TO BUILD ROCKETS, BUT AND GOODS FOR PEOPLE, WELL AND NATURALLY PSYCHOLOGISTS AND ANALYTICS SHOULD BE LONGLY AWAY.
  5. +1
    28 August 2011 00: 31
    while Ukrainian politicians will be able to rob their people with impunity, there will be no union. and spit on us
  6. Ivan35
    +2
    28 August 2011 00: 36
    Of course there will be Sava, there will be a chance to create a new Union and I believe that for Ukraine and Ukrainians it will be both more economically and better - more comfortable in spiritual and cultural proximity with the Russian (Belarusian) people!
    And of course, if you forget about the needs of people - such a Union will soon fall apart again

    And the article is muddy again! I already gave my opinion on a similar article (Samsonov or something) - if you just swear at Ukraine and declare something like you were not there before, etc., it does not contribute to rapprochement
  7. SAVA
    +2
    28 August 2011 00: 51
    THE MAIN PROCESS OF ASSOCIATION HAS ALREADY BEGINNED (CUSTOMS UNION), SILENTLY WE WILL TOGETHER AGAIN TOGETHER, AT LEAST TIME IS NOT VERY MUCH.
    1. zczczc
      0
      28 August 2011 01: 24
      Yes, but Ukraine flatly refused to join the CU.
      1. Marat
        +3
        28 August 2011 03: 01
        Unfortunately, the interests of the Ukrainian oligarchs did not coincide with the line for integration (as the interests of the Kazakh and Russian oligarchic clans coincided)
        Now Ukraine is "lagging behind" by 2 steps - we passed the TC stage "in a hurry" and signed the CES (again in turmoil) since 2012 it has been operating on the territory of 3 republics - a serious application for a political final unification.

        But without Ukraine, this is not exactly the Union - the only hope is to revive a strong allied state capable of defending its interests during this reunion with Ukraine

        Well, if they could then bring to power a government with great Communist influence, then the oligarchs could be squeezed out of the helm.

        I don’t see anything impossible here - I think it will be so - the main thing is to vote correctly
  8. SAVA
    0
    28 August 2011 02: 06
    I DON'T EVEN KNOW WHAT TO ANSWER, MANY VOTED FOR YANUKOVYCH IN THE HOPE OF HIS ORIENTATION TO RUSSIA, BUT IT WAS ON THE VERSATILE, WE HAVE NOT TO CHOOSE FROM WHAT THERE WAS A SPY, THIEF AND JUDGED THAT WE HAVE ROOM WHO IS NEGATIVE TO THIS UNION "WE DO NOT NEED THE CAUCASIANS, WE HAVE ENOUGH TO THE NEWS" SO IT IS WORTH DILEMA, OR HAVE BEEN HAPPENED WITH US, WE WOULD HAVE ANYWHERE ALONE WE, ALTHOUGH OUR "COPS" GOVERN ORDER BASICLY THE POSITION DOES NOT GIVE ANYONE RELAX)))
    1. zczczc
      0
      28 August 2011 02: 09
      And the Crimean Tatars? There is far from order. They on the Maidan beat their tambourines once.
      1. SAVA
        +1
        28 August 2011 02: 21
        AND CHECHEN THERE IN CRIMEA THE LAST TIME MORE APPEARED WHY THAT !? WAITING FOR YOUR HOUR
        1. Marat
          +2
          28 August 2011 02: 50
          I read from Starikov an interesting theory that the current integration of the 3 republics began with the permission of the United States - they gave it in exchange for us to stop discussing withdrawal from the dollar zone and canceling the payment of tribute in the form of a stabilization fund. It seems like Russia’s getting blanche cards and the United States ceasing to organize orange revolutions — and Russia’s getting free hands to unite several republics.

          And indeed - after all, conversations about integration have been conducted for a long time - and our very Nazarbayev was always the initiator - like Putin had something to be stubborn about earlier - and the START came about two years ago - and the CES also signed immediately for the TS — the whole package already 2012 and now the CES is already a fact - some kind of rush after a long pause - in general, his theory converges

          So it turns out that the Ukrainian leadership will be twisted out of their hands - and still integrate
  9. SAVA
    +2
    28 August 2011 11: 36
    GIVE TO UNITE!? WITH THE PURPOSE OF ONE MOT AND TO DESTROY EVERYONE, IF WE WILL BE DEFENDING TOGETHER AND THEY KNOW THAT WE HAVE NOTHING CUT EVERYTHING AND SELL SO THAT WE WILL HAVE TO JUST "MISHA" IF UKRAINE STAYS ON THE SIDE THAT WILL SURVIVE AND THIS IS EXTRA MOUTH FOR THEIR FUTURE ECONOMY WHAT WE ARE NOT ALL ABLE TO HAND, HOW MANY SLAVES DO WE NEED? 70 MILLION AND EVERYTHING !! So there is need to think WELL THAT WOULD UNDERSTAND WHAT THE THEORY, BUT WE CAN foil their plans quickly and well armed by itself, and if Ukraine will join the EU or not meet the extortionate ORDERS ON DISARMAMENT simply ignoring them may eventually play for WEST ROLE AT THE LAST BATTLE ON THE SIDE OF THEIR BROTHERS BY THE BLOOD OF THE RUSSIANS, AT THE LAST BATTLE OF THE "TROYAN HORSE" ALMOST LIKE AN OLD MAN!))))
  10. NSV
    0
    10 September 2022 16: 17
    Interesting to read in September 2022....