On the way to the Black Sea, the American destroyer Ross met with Russian BDK

71
Today, the American destroyer Ross, belonging to the sixth, entered the Black Sea the fleet US Navy. Before the arrival of Ross in the Black Sea, October 30 of this year, American warships were absent. To the Russian press, the departure of the Cole destroyer on October 30 and the absence of successor ships for several days gave reason to argue that the Americans decided to reduce the passions in the region. As it turned out, such conclusions were premature.

On the way to the Black Sea, the American destroyer Ross met with Russian BDK


On the entry of the American destroyer "Ross" in the Black Sea reports Interfax.

Meanwhile, in Twitter microblog Yörük Işık Photos are being published of how the American destroyer Ross in the Bosphorus Strait met Russian landing ships Novocherkassk and Kaliningrad on its way, which were sent to the Mediterranean.



Such a meeting Turkish blogger called "the echo of the Cold War."

The Ross is a warship of the Arly Burke project. Commissioned in 1997 year. Length 154 m, draft 9,3 m (with GUS), displacement 6,6 thousand tons. Crew 337 man. Armed with Tomahawk cruise missiles.
71 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +29
    5 November 2014 14: 14
    Such a meeting Turkish blogger called "the echo of the Cold War."

    Well, EM met with BDK, so what? Now, if the destroyer "Leader" was in place of the large landing craft, or at least frigate 22350, then yes hi
    1. +63
      5 November 2014 14: 16
      Then everything will be as usual
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. +46
        5 November 2014 14: 21
        Quote: herruvim
        will be as usual


        It pleases me more:

        Nuclear submarine Tula successfully launched the Sineva intercontinental missile
        1. +18
          5 November 2014 14: 25
          Over six months, more than 35 000 foreign anti-fascist volunteers entered the DPR
          Over the past six months, more than 35 thousand foreign volunteers have come to the territory of the Donetsk People's Republic. This was announced by the well-known Russian writer Zakhar Prilepin on his page in the social network with reference to representatives of the DPR.
          “I mentioned the figure of the militias who passed through Novorossiya - 35 thousand people. Recently, one sociologist tried to challenge it, said that the figure was too high. I had to make inquiries already in the DPR. They nodded to us: yes, in general, they stopped in for almost six months. 35 thousand people, "Prilepin wrote. According to him, most of the volunteers come to the DPR for periods ranging from two to three weeks to several months. Volunteers not only take part in hostilities, but also work in other areas.
          "These are mainly militia units, but there are many workers from other services - doctors, firefighters, specialists in various fields - for example, the thermal power plant in Lugansk is also repaired by people from Russia," Prilepin wrote.
          The total number of volunteers, Prilepin says, may be much higher, since “while the militia was gathering around Strelkov, no one kept records.” “Now records are kept both in the DPR and LPR and at the border. A militia and I were crossing the border to meet Sasha Sklyar, who was on his way to us from Rostov. The major asked us for a passport: "Sorry, guys, we have an order to scan your documents" ... at the moment they have 35 thousand scans there, a little more or a little less. What will they do with them? " - asks Prilepin rhetorically.
          Until recently, most volunteers were not paid any money, only rations were given. Now a number of militias are given salaries - $ 200 a month, the writer added.
          Source: http://rusvesna.su/news/1415184899
          1. +13
            5 November 2014 14: 47
            Quote: Colorado
            For six months, more than 35 entered the DPR

            No matter how fantastic such a figure sounds, it seems that it can even be underestimated somewhere, but I agree with such numbers because I just spoke to a person who came from there to rest and add - now people have come from Ossetia there.
      3. +7
        5 November 2014 14: 38
        And there is evidence how many amers wrote dismissal reports after this meeting laughing
        1. +3
          5 November 2014 14: 45
          Quote: Sibiryak 1975
          And there is evidence how many amers wrote dismissal reports after this meeting

          The whole crew. laughing
    2. +5
      5 November 2014 14: 16
      It would be boring without peeping NATO ships.
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. +4
        5 November 2014 14: 25
        The owners feel like .. Well, nothing .. will float up like a submarine, ours in front of the coast of Florida purely "smoke"
        1. 0
          5 November 2014 21: 50
          They feel like masters

          I think not anymore.
        2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +6
      5 November 2014 14: 17
      In the event of a collision, take the Americans on board.
      1. +6
        5 November 2014 14: 23
        Dvizhuha continues, am.ery spy and dirty tricks, and our Syria to help consumer goods driven.


        The word A.me.ry is now also considered not politically correct on our website))) It turns into Americans
        1. +5
          5 November 2014 15: 19
          Quote: viktorrymar
          and our Syria to help consumer goods driven.

          The Syrian Express continues its work.
    4. +9
      5 November 2014 14: 20
      Quote: Wiruz
      Well, EM met with BDK, so what? Now, if the destroyer "Leader" was in place of the large landing craft, or at least frigate 22350, then yes

      It would be better if the Khasan training ship was in place of the large landing craft. He has experience - what to do with NATO ships (in the Sea of ​​Marmara, in low visibility conditions). laughing
      1. +27
        5 November 2014 14: 40
        On the way to the Black Sea, the American destroyer Ross met with Russian BDK
        From this whole article, only one conclusion can be drawn - our ships are the most beautiful. Even the Project 775 BDK is prettier than the "Arlie Burke". smile
        1. +5
          5 November 2014 15: 20
          This BDK was photographed in Sevastopol, and it is not known when ... Konstantinovsky ravelin is like a print on the forehead, you won’t wash it ... Our drift, and in our port! Painted recently - there are no scuffs and rust deposits around the clus.
      2. +2
        5 November 2014 14: 59
        From such a distance and the weapons of the BDK would be enough to pile Arly)))
      3. +2
        5 November 2014 15: 30
        Quote: Alexey RA
        Quote: Wiruz
        Well, EM met with BDK, so what? Now, if the destroyer "Leader" was in place of the large landing craft, or at least frigate 22350, then yes

        It would be better if the Khasan training ship was in place of the large landing craft. He has experience - what to do with NATO ships (in the Sea of ​​Marmara, in low visibility conditions). laughing

        And more fog. recourse
    5. +3
      5 November 2014 14: 33
      Quote: Wiruz
      Such a meeting Turkish blogger called "the echo of the Cold War."

      Well, EM met with BDK, so what? Now, if the destroyer "Leader" was in place of the large landing craft, or at least frigate 22350, then yes hi

      Well, at least you can lean over laughing
    6. +5
      5 November 2014 14: 44
      In, damn it, a sensation! Yes, such dozens go to the World Cup all year round. What is a schucher? laughing
      1. +3
        5 November 2014 15: 34
        Quote: siberalt
        In, damn it, a sensation! Yes, such dozens go to the World Cup all year round. What is a schucher? laughing

        In the beginning we made a flyby of the "drying", now they will fly over the "carcasses". You will not envy the gringo. laughing
      2. 0
        5 November 2014 22: 35
        Not quite a schukher, for some reason it doesn’t bother anyone that the mattress grazes in the World Cup and is present year-round .....
    7. Ataman
      +3
      5 November 2014 15: 11
      Quote: Wiruz
      Well, EM met with BDK, so what? Now, if the destroyer "Leader" was in place of the large landing craft, or at least frigate 22350, then yes

      Or at least a USET-80 torpedo
    8. +1
      5 November 2014 15: 53
      Wiruz
      Such a meeting Turkish blogger called "the echo of the Cold War."

      Well, EM met with BDK, so what? Now, if the destroyer "Leader" was in place of the large landing craft, or at least frigate 22350, then yes


      Yes? :-) And what would happen then?
    9. The comment was deleted.
    10. +1
      5 November 2014 17: 03
      And they parted like ships in the sea, thank God that there is peacetime now.
    11. The comment was deleted.
    12. +6
      5 November 2014 18: 50
      It would be nice if the American meets the good old German mine
    13. Denis fj
      +4
      5 November 2014 20: 56
      met and passed by? Why didn’t they send to the bottom?

      release the kraken !!!
  2. +20
    5 November 2014 14: 15
    The Ross is a warship of the Arly Burke project. Commissioned in 1997 year. Length 154 m, draft 9,3 m (with GUS), displacement 6,6 thousand tons. Crew 337 man. Armed with Tomahawk cruise missiles.


    So what, but the BDK 775 has a length of 112,5 m, a width of 15 m, a draft of 3,7 m, the horseradish is put into operation, knows what terry year, and the crew is 87 people. Of the weapons there are as many as 25 paratroopers and 10 tanks that remained at the base to rest. To all this, there is still (MLRS) MS-73 "Thunderstorm", AK-725, MP-103, AK-176, AK-630M. - and most importantly everything works. And in general, it is not painted because it is clear that severe sailors are not up to drawing ...
    1. Bombardier
      +5
      5 November 2014 14: 19
      What kind of paint is there, the motor resource would have withstood - that’s what the concern is, because the pace of movement is not weak, and there is no replacement even on the way.
      1. 0
        5 November 2014 18: 53
        Quote: Bombardier
        What kind of paint is there, the motor resource would have withstood - that’s what the concern is, because the pace of movement is not weak, and there is no replacement even on the way.

        and the "mistrals" with the long-suffering "Gren"?
        1. Bombardier
          0
          5 November 2014 19: 21
          read the answer to your question below, at least for the "Gren" .... the mistrals will somehow please the paratroopers
    2. +16
      5 November 2014 14: 19
      Ours need not paint their own ship, but add two letters to the name of the American ship: it was "Ross", now it is "Russia". Where are our submarine saboteurs? smile
      1. +3
        5 November 2014 14: 31
        So his name was "Russia" while he set sail from his America, going to the shores of Belarus, like Nekrasov ... laughing
    3. +2
      5 November 2014 14: 21
      Our at least painted the ship did not hurt ...

      They, in fact, should soon be replaced with "Grens", so why paint in vain
      1. +3
        5 November 2014 15: 37
        The tradition is fresh, but hard to believe. How many 775s do we have? And how many "Grenovs" are included?
        I'm not even talking about how many head "Gren" is being built. But for the next "Gren" there will again be a new project - with import substitution.
    4. The comment was deleted.
    5. GRANATE-19
      +8
      5 November 2014 14: 25
      Quote: IAlex
      Our at least painted the ship did not hurt ...

      So terrible, reminds a car of Jeepers Creepers, let them be afraid ...
      piss american, I'm going!

      Well, to be honest, you need to keep the equipment in order.
    6. +6
      5 November 2014 14: 40
      Quote: IAlex
      So what, but the BDK 775 has a length of 112,5 m, a width of 15 m, a draft of 3,7 m, hell knows what terry was put into operation, and the crew of 87 people. Of the weapons there are as many 25 paratroopers and 10 tanks that remained at the base to rest. To all this there is still (MLRS) MS-73 "Thunderstorm", AK-725, MP-103, AK-176, AK-630M. - and most importantly everything works. And in general it is not painted because it is clear that sailors are not up to drawing ...

      IAlex, how did you guess that the BDK is not painted? For example, I see that it is painted and painted with the Black Sea shade of ball paint! And how to understand the words "sailors have no time for drawing"? A sailor draws his ship at least once a month and, in comparison with a nuclear explosion, a sailor with a brush is much more effective in destructive power! Well, the fact that the meetings of our ships and the Yusovsk ones are becoming commonplace makes me very happy!
      1. -7
        5 November 2014 14: 47
        The news was reprinted from another resource where the photo is of better quality ... See the rust on the starboard side?
        Anyway, it looks like it was taken from the Ukrainian garbage can, you can congratulate only Taburetkina and Shoigu, who gave all the repair enterprises to dill ...
        If they tint twice a month - that means, as I said, it wasn’t up to drawing ... And yet there is hope that the Black Sea Fleet is not all in this state ...
        1. +5
          5 November 2014 15: 26
          Strange, the red spot is exactly where the tail number should be, if I’m not mistaken ... But the cohesive rusted, and the ball faded, as if he had already wandered a lot ... If such was kicked out into the sea, then ... circumstances those more. Usually, before the trip, the ship is pretty prepared: they paint, wash, believe ...
          1. +5
            5 November 2014 18: 27
            Kaliningrad and Novocherkassk already more than 20 flights ran back this year. They are not up to painting. They are loaded to the SLC and to Tartus - a flight every week, and the BDK grouping in operations is reduced sad . To NG with BF replenishment will come in the form of BDK Korolev - and The Baltic Fleet will remain without running BDK for some time.

            This is by the way to the question of the Mistral, why they are needed. Here on the 4 BF there are new Corvettes, there is a mosquito fleet, even both diesel-electric submarines are in line, and from 4 BDK there are 2 in operation, 2 from operation until the middle of 2015 of the year in repairs.
            1. 0
              6 November 2014 14: 22
              Who to believe? Who so photographed? In the picture attached by the author to the article, the ship is still in good condition, the clotfish is clearly colored, there are no rust streaks. Or almost none. But in the picture proposed by IAlex, the rust is noticeably visible, the bite is like an anchor chain scrubbing it for several months ... Yes, and the Bosphorus ... Unless there are similar places when entering the Black Sea ...
        2. +9
          5 November 2014 15: 51
          Quote: IAlex
          Anyway, it looks like it was taken from the Ukrainian garbage can, you can congratulate only Taburetkina and Shoigu, who gave all the repair enterprises to dill ...

          I apologize wildly, but when was this 13 SRZ given to Ukraine? The same shipyard that capitalized the Zaporozhye underwater chapel.

          Rusty large landing craft for a different reason - they are driven in the "Syrian Express" in the tail and mane. That is, if you stand on a barrel and get out into the sea every 2-3 months - then you can be beautiful. And if you shuttle continuously throughout the year, then anyone will peel off.
          1. -1
            5 November 2014 16: 32
            Is it bad with the Russian? It says "as if" ... And what claims to my comment about rust, do you not like that it is, or just run into pretend that it is not there, or if you justify why it is there, this will make the rusty ship easier? Moreover, I parallel to where they drive him, and in general, where did you get the idea that they often drive him somewhere?
            1. +7
              5 November 2014 17: 13
              Quote: IAlex
              And what claims to my comment about rust,

              The claim is one. You write:
              Quote: IAlex
              I can only congratulate Taburetkin and Shoigu, who gave all the repair enterprises to dill ...

              So I’m interested in - when is FSUE 13 SRZ PRF of the RF Ministry of Defense given to Ukraine?
              Or would you just show an active civic position by kicking the "furniture maker" and the "fireman" - it doesn't matter if your statement contradicts the facts?
              Quote: IAlex
              you don’t like that it is, or just run into the pretense that it is not there, or if you justify why it is there, will it make it easier for a rusty ship? Moreover, I’m parallel to where they are driving him, and generally why did you get the idea that they often drive him somewhere?

              Hmm ... I understood correctly that you undertook to comment on the appearance of the large landing craft, not even knowing about its service? The Syrian Express, in which they assembled the large landing craft of three fleets, has been walking for two years already (I was mistaken - it all started at the end of 2012). There is an intensity of passage of the Straits for the first 5 months: http://www.sdelanounas.ru/blogs/33962

              Specifically for 2014 and two data of the BDK:
              On September 9, 2014, the Novocherkassk (142) Black Sea Fleet and the Kaliningrad (102) Baltic Fleet returned to the Black Sea from the next flight to Syria with a load of military equipment for the Assad regime.

              September 29, 2014. The large landing ships (BDK) of the Black Sea and Baltic Fleets Novocherkassk and Kaliningrad left the permanent operational formations of the Russian Navy in the Mediterranean Sea and are preparing to enter Novorossiysk.

              October 11, 2014 Today the large landing ship (BDK) of the Baltic Fleet "Kaliningrad" left the port of Novorossiysk and headed for the Mediterranean Sea.

              October 25, 2014 BDK Novocherkassk and the hydrographic vessel Donuzlav passed the Bosphorus Strait and entered the Black Sea. This was announced on October 27, 2014 by the turkishnavy.net portal.

              That is, the previous exit in the direction of the Straits and the Mediterranean at "Kaliningrad" was in early October (when the BDK returned to the World Cup - alas, I did not find it). But on the "Novocherkassk" data is: on October 25, he passed the Straits towards Novorossiysk.
              And here they are again in the Bosphorus. I wonder how the GEC has not yet been killed at the BDK.
              On the other hand, for these 2 years, the BDK crews were at sea, probably more than in the previous 20 years.

              For reference: the Kaliningrad large landing craft is the ship of the DKBF. He left Baltiysk on December 24, 2013. On October 22, 2014, the large landing craft "Alexander Shabalin" left Baltiysk. PMSM, until it reaches the Mediterranean, "Kaliningrad" once again has time to run back and forth.
        3. VOLKHOV
          +1
          5 November 2014 17: 00
          Cool Ukrainian spaceport?
          1. +1
            5 November 2014 17: 01
            Rather, dreams related to the reality of an inverted horseshoe ...
        4. +3
          6 November 2014 06: 16
          Strange, IAlex, for some reason I always thought that the Crimea pros.ral everyone respected Boris Nikolaevich !? Moreover, of the three shipyards, the 13 was miraculously left for Russia, and the Novorossiysk Shipyard is a serious office, I’ll tell you wink . So, Taburetkin and Shoigu, whom you loved, couldn’t give the ship repair plants to Ukraine.
      2. +6
        5 November 2014 15: 04
        Quote: Serg65
        It is painted and painted with a Black Sea tint of ball paint!

        Two submarines emerge in the Persian Gulf, ours and the American. Captains climbed out to the logging. The American cap waves its claw and shouts:
        - Hello, rushen!
        Our answers:
        - Cheoooo! Hu @ woo painted ?! Attention! From first to fourth torpedo tubes tovs! Start!
        laughing
      3. +1
        5 November 2014 18: 56
        Quote: Serg65
        Well, the fact that the meetings of our ships and Yusovskys are becoming commonplace, I am even very happy !!

        if in the Atlantic or in the Pacific, then yes, but not in the Black Sea ... am
        1. +3
          6 November 2014 06: 23
          Quote: PSih2097
          if in the Atlantic or in the Pacific, then yes, but not in the Black Sea ...

          Alexander, do not rush things! Everything has its time bully
        2. 0
          6 November 2014 16: 02
          Quote: PSih2097
          if in the Atlantic or in the Pacific, then yes, but not in the Black Sea ...

          The oceans are large, so why not meet in the Caribbean Sea or even in the Gulf of Mexico? drinks
  3. +9
    5 November 2014 14: 16
    Eh ... It's a pity the Tsar Bosphorus and Dardanelles did not have time to take control ... There wouldn’t be non-Russian ships there now hi
  4. +5
    5 November 2014 14: 16
    "Moscow" seems to be under repair? It's a pity.
    1. +1
      5 November 2014 14: 20
      Just about Moscow, does anyone know what exactly it will be armed with after renovation? "Volcanoes" will change?
    2. Bombardier
      +5
      5 November 2014 14: 21
      "Kerch" during the holidays burned in the engine compartment of 80 sq.m. - something that was not written anywhere or I missed?
      1. +2
        5 November 2014 14: 48
        There was info in the news in the runner
  5. +1
    5 November 2014 14: 17
    No one there with Ross quit fear yet, no? laughing
  6. FACKtoREAL
    +15
    5 November 2014 14: 17
    Sir, I did not understand the warning signal of the Russians ... "USA - FSO!" belay
  7. +3
    5 November 2014 14: 19
    Did they call the guys from aviation to the regiment where the Su-24 is based? ... laughing
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. GRANATE-19
      +2
      5 November 2014 15: 05
      Quote: nvn_co
      Did they call the guys from aviation to the regiment where the Su-24 is based? ... laughing

      It would be necessary for the SU-34 unit, before them in the wing-to-wing team, and then on the way - they dispersed, and preferably a squadron ...
      In general, one type of plane flies, but on the approach after scattering several ...
      Then the Americans would fill the diapers.
  8. +3
    5 November 2014 14: 22
    US sailors are on foreign territory for several thousand miles from their country and are trying to advance US interests in RUSSIA ....
    Sailors of RUSSIA are near their borders and defend their home, their country ... and this is the fundamental difference between the situation in which the US Navy is obviously doomed to defeat.
  9. +2
    5 November 2014 14: 23
    Well met, then what? Having a narrow spill, it’s hard to miss each other, especially since Turkey regulates the penetration of ships at its discretion. We stood on the roads for two days, while the Turks overtook our submarines.
    By the way, we can help our partners and expand the strait by reducing the territory of Turkey, if something does not suit them. At the same time, we will try the Mace again ...
    1. +1
      5 November 2014 14: 26
      Having a narrow spill, it’s hard to miss each other, especially since Turkey regulates the penetration of ships at its discretion.


      From a military point of view, this strait is very vulnerable ..... one good raid of strategic aviation and this strait will cease to fulfill its functions for a long time.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +3
      6 November 2014 06: 46
      Quote: s30461
      Well met, then what? Having a narrow spill, it’s hard to miss each other, especially since Turkey regulates the penetration of ships at its discretion. We stood on the roads for two days, while the Turks overtook our submarines.
      By the way, we can help our partners and expand the strait by reducing the territory of Turkey, if something does not suit them. At the same time, we will try the Mace again ...

      On May 14, 1986, the Bosphorus Strait was saved from expansion by a small inaccuracy, the captain of the bulk carrier "Captain Soroka" missed only a couple of meters when aiming at the board of the KSK "Berezina"; For a time Alah was merciful to the Turks, as well as to our sailors.
  10. igorche
    +2
    5 November 2014 14: 24
    And then, an Amer sailor somewhere at home in Oklahoma will show off to local simpletons, as he abruptly opposed the reckless Russian paratroopers laughing
    1. +3
      5 November 2014 15: 09
      Quote: igorche
      in front of local simpletons, how he abruptly resisted the reckless Russian paratroopers

      And at night, shake under the covers, and remember what pile heaped. belay
  11. hard
    +8
    5 November 2014 14: 25
    We fly to the An-2 with the Khibiny. That will be joke.
  12. +2
    5 November 2014 14: 27
    We then left the house "for a walk", and where are they? Surely test new waterproof diapers! laughing
  13. +6
    5 November 2014 14: 30
    He went in and went in ... Cruise missiles ... so the first one launched in our direction will be the last for him ... From the Crimea, everything Black is shot through, and that, exactly, is unsinkable.
  14. The comment was deleted.
  15. +5
    5 November 2014 14: 31
    Wait a moment, they will tryndet that Russian ships maneuver dangerously close to US ships and behave very boldly.
    1. +2
      5 November 2014 14: 36
      Wait a moment, they will tryndet that Russian ships maneuver dangerously close to US ships and behave very boldly.

      Why are you taking bread from Psaki? laughing
      1. +2
        5 November 2014 16: 43
        Nah, psaki with all the desire you will not surpass laughing
  16. +1
    5 November 2014 14: 37
    since in the Crimea antitumor systems have already been deployed, this fragile shuttle of the United States has good chances of becoming attached to a drowned one, if something is wrong. angry
  17. +2
    5 November 2014 14: 37
    It seems that the exchange of dreadnoughts took place in equal proportions, but each has its own tasks! Why bother with the pages of a transparent network.
  18. +2
    5 November 2014 14: 47
    Probably we need some kind of thread destroyer to enter the Gulf of Mexico ... so that the Americans finally understand something.
    1. Viktor Kudinov
      +2
      5 November 2014 15: 37
      A submarine floating in the middle of the Great American Lakes - that would be nice too.
  19. +4
    5 November 2014 14: 48
    Quote: Aleksey11
    Wait a moment, they will tryndet that Russian ships maneuver dangerously close to US ships and behave very boldly.

    Yes, they are throwing maces at us. laughing
  20. +2
    5 November 2014 14: 57
    Yeh, an airborne salvo would, okay, see you in the Gulf of Mexico! bully
  21. +2
    5 November 2014 15: 11
    Amers need to be shown that a battering ram is a normal state of the Russian sailor ... then everything will turn out in my head ..
  22. 0
    5 November 2014 15: 30
    useless article !!!!! What is it?
    1. 0
      6 November 2014 10: 01
      And drink .... to eat?
  23. +1
    5 November 2014 16: 06
    Psaki’s hand, as promised, sent the sixth US fleet to the borders of Belarus
    1. 0
      5 November 2014 22: 01
      Quote: Fantazer911
      Psaki’s hand, as promised, sent the sixth US fleet to the borders of Belarus

      They gathered to demolish Ukraine. The destroyer fitted.
  24. +1
    5 November 2014 16: 09
    Bullshit is all that. In the event of a conflict, one destroyer will not do the weather. They won’t even have time to pickle
  25. sazhka4
    +1
    5 November 2014 16: 09
    Cap .. Why don't you leave the toilet ?? The Russians are above us .. That's why I don’t go out.
  26. 0
    5 November 2014 16: 17
    For a long time we didn’t collect something trophies. NATO anchored the boat without thinking that it was not the ocean. The Black Sea has one entrance. And the exit can be obtained through the anus. That would then not have to go to the Proctologist for an appointment laughing
  27. kelevra
    0
    5 November 2014 17: 40
    It was necessary to capture him as a trophy!
  28. Observer
    0
    5 November 2014 17: 46
    Interesting? Did you greet each other with beeps? After all, "Partners" as politicians say.
  29. 0
    5 November 2014 17: 56
    How many reports have been submitted this time ???)))))
  30. +4
    5 November 2014 18: 06
    It is gratifying that in order to destroy the 6th fleet of the USA (and not only it), our fleet does not need to go to the Mediterranean Sea at all. Enough White. Or the Barents ...
  31. +1
    5 November 2014 18: 30
    Kerch was finally put out. 4 compartment burned out completely, cars burned out. The ship is all. Well, at least without casualties. Preliminary - gross violation of TB l / s warhead-5.
    1. 0
      5 November 2014 18: 56
      Quote: donavi49
      Kerch was finally put out. 4 compartments burned out completely, cars burned out. The ship is all.

      If so, then a complete polar fox. Even if the building is restored, the GTU will only be in 2017. Kerch did not wait for a change.
      And there was only one large oil company left at the Black Sea Fleet - "Moscow". And to him - the ancient "Sharp-witted" and a pair of 1135 - "Ladny" and "Sweating" ... that is, "Inquisitive".

      Although the Black Sea Fleet has long been a museum: the last living Ave. 61M, the last living 1134B (was), the last half-living 641B.
      1. 0
        5 November 2014 20: 27
        Quote: Alexey RA
        Although the Black Sea Fleet has long been a museum: the last living Ave. 61M, the last living 1134B (was), the last half-living 641B.

        if you wish, you can still revive this ...
        The cruiser Mikhail Kutuzov, series 68 bis, modification 68-A.


  32. The comment was deleted.
  33. 0
    5 November 2014 20: 43
    Never mind, God forbid our time will come too! "Leaders" will walk in flocks across the straits, covering full-fledged squadrons.
  34. +3
    5 November 2014 21: 20
    Quote: viktorrymar
    The word A.me.ry is now also considered not politically correct on our website))) It turns into Americans

    Rather in "america-kantsy" wink
  35. +1
    5 November 2014 23: 37
    The presence of American ships near the borders of Russia creates tension in the region, destabilizes the situation. carries the danger of shipping in the Black Sea, scares schools of fish and harms the fishing of the Black Sea countries !!! Enough ?! KOZL.L. in.O.S.J.H.I.E., go away from our borders !!! Everything in the Gulf of Mexico !!!
  36. 0
    6 November 2014 09: 15
    But could we send at least a couple of submarines to us in the Gulf of Mexico (to protect shipping from international pirates)! It is necessary to protect the values ​​of the free world!