Yezidi women who are slaves to ISIS militants beg to bomb them

39
Compassion4Kurdistan activists, who arrived in Iraq to gather evidence of the persecution of representatives of the Yezidi community of ISIS militants, were able to talk with one of the young women of Yezidi, who are being held as a sex slave.

Yezidi women who are slaves to ISIS militants beg to bomb them


“If you know where we are, please bomb us!” For me, there is no more life. Anyway, I'm going to commit suicide - others have already done the same thing this morning. (...) It’s still far from dinner, and I’m already raped 30 once. I can't even go to the toilet. Please bomb us, ”quotes a woman. mignews.com.

This conversation took place just a couple of days after the UN declared the persecution of representatives of the Yezidi community by Islamists as genocide.

“We remind all armed groups that sexual violence is a gross violation of fundamental human rights, which can be considered as war crimes and crimes against humanity,” the statement of the world organization, which condemns the persecution of ethnic minorities in territories seized by Islamists, is noted.

Earlier, the results of a UN special study on sexual slavery, which includes abducted Yezidis, including minors, were published. An 13-year-old girl who escaped from captivity said that women who are not able to escape remain in captivity in the militants.
39 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +43
    24 October 2014 13: 21
    There are no words! Frantic baboons. Something else about God babbling!
    1. +22
      24 October 2014 13: 24
      Barbarians and criminals, such must be destroyed without trial.
      1. +27
        24 October 2014 13: 35
        Here are the amers - s.ki! What creatures have been fed! Democrats are dumb!
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +41
      24 October 2014 13: 33
      Quote: Akvadra
      Something else about God babbling!

      Maybe terrorism is the result of a distorted understanding of the Qur'an. But after all - it’s precisely the Koran, and not books about Winnie the Pooh. And the sources of this distortion are the most learned Islamic men (ulama), and not illiterate Arab skinheads. The Islamic world is not related to the world of terror by bad students, but by excellent and popular teachers! On such a scale, terrorist preaching is already a disease of the entire Islamic community. And for some reason, if terrorist training centers are found in Russia, Kazakhstan or Uzbekistan, then these centers are more likely to be associated with mosques and madrassas (Muslim seminaries) than with service dog breeding clubs.
      Do terrorists have no religion? But they undoubtedly and firmly believe in the continuation of life after the explosion of their own body. They glorify a very definite God (and this is by no means the name of the great Witzley-Putzli). And the names of their organizations indicate their readiness to fight for Islam, and not for football.
      They can be considered bad Muslims. But these are Muslims
      1. Natalia
        +7
        24 October 2014 14: 07
        Quote: Region 23
        Maybe terrorism is the result of a distorted understanding of the Qur'an. But after all - it’s precisely the Koran, and not books about Winnie the Pooh.

        Well, for the most part, as you rightly pointed out, in general, yes. Most terrorists are alas, Muslims (faithful / infidels, which are not important), but Muslims. It is in the east.

        But in the west there are terrorists - they are fascists, Bendera, neo-Nazis.
        So in general and in general - in every nation there are rotten currents.
        But since it is the Muslim countries that are the most technological backward, the greatest currents of radicalism are from there.

        By the way - this is also the result of not only technological, but especially moral backwardness. Take at least women. Yes, they are in Muslim countries and no one can call - a thing. The subject with which you can do everything. And I don’t know from what religious sources this flows, but it’s disgusting.
        1. +3
          24 October 2014 14: 36
          I would also add that the policies pursued by the Anglo-Saxon elites will be better than radical Islam both in scale and cynicism. Yes, they do not cut their heads into cameras in squares, but when the heads and bodies of objectionable fly to pieces as a result of bombing from the air - the essence does not change
        2. +2
          24 October 2014 16: 56
          Moreover, which is characteristic, in Iran, which is no less than a fully theocratic country - which, it would seem, should lead to even greater religious radicalism - there are practically no such terrorists and radicals. Why? Very simple: among Muslim countries, it is Iran that is the most technologically developed, with the largest (percentage) educated population (including a very large number of women with higher education - according to the latest estimates, there are more women engineers in Iran than men engineers, emnip). So there really is a strong dependence on education and technical development.
          1. +1
            25 October 2014 01: 51
            And in Iran there is a dictator.
            Both in Libya there was a dictator and in Iraq. The Syrian is still fighting.
            And if there is no Dictator in the east, then there is radicalism.
      2. 0
        24 October 2014 14: 37
        The United States has pushed and nurtured radicalism for many years. In the case of Muslims, this is radicalism; in the case of dill, it is fascism. To each his own, each nation has its own weak points on which you can put pressure. Nazism, territorial disputes, dissatisfaction with the economy, corruption, etc.
      3. wanderer_032
        +3
        24 October 2014 16: 14
        Quote: Region 23
        But these are Muslims


        They’re not Muslims, but ... brainwashed zombies.
        Let's look at an approximate verbal portrait of these same zombies who call themselves Orthodox Muslims.
        If these are inhabitants from the regions of the Middle East, Central or Southeast Asia, then these are mainly the dregs of local society. Poverty and the wimps, that is, immigrants from the lower strata of society who live at the very bottom, due to uncontrolled fertility.
        Most of them have no education (except for the training courses that they take in the militant training camps), many of them do not even know how to read, let alone be able to analyze something in their brains.
        It is not surprising that anyone can be sculpted from this uneducated biomass.
        So at least tell me, they will take everything at face value.
        Of course there is a layer of people from quite prosperous families with education, but they are brainwashed in educational institutions (schools, colleges, universities)
        "svidomye" teachers, or agitators specially sent to them.
        Such as a rule occupy command positions of the lower and middle level, if they show sufficient ingenuity for this of course.
        If these are immigrants from Western Europe, then as a rule they are also immigrants from the social bottom. Mostly immigrants from Asia and Africa or their children.
        Among Europeans, these are "amateurs" to seek adventure on their ass, as a rule, snotty young people who have already gotten fed up (or rather zazhralis) the benefits of democracy and other delights of "civilization".
        Talking with the children of immigrants from Asia and Africa, they are recruited by this muck.
        It is possible that the "branches" of radical pseudo-Islamic organizations pay good money for every "shaved" European, to the families of these very immigrants.
        There are quite a few drug addicts among the so-called "faithful", which, combined with pseudo-religious propaganda and training in militant camps, finally transforms the remnants of the embryo of the human mind into the consciousness of super-animal sadism and super-cruelty, which we can observe from the garbage video that pours continuous flow in the vastness of the global Internet network.
        What kind of religious faithfulness can be discussed here, if these mutants kill everything and everything that they meet on the way before their eyes.
        Regardless of age, gender and belonging to one or another people.
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. +3
          24 October 2014 16: 52
          Mark Gabriel

          ISLAM AND TERRORISM

          (According to the book “Circles on the Water” of the Veer Publishing House, 2005, Charisma House, 2002)

          In 1980, as a freshman at Al-Az-Khar University, I attended the Interpretation of the Qur'an course. Twice a month, we gathered for lectures given by a blind sheikh, who became famous among students for his radical views.

          Each time the Qur'an mentioned Jews or Christians, he called with deep satisfaction the first children of pigs, and the last - infidels. He did not hide his desire to resort to jihad as a means in the struggle for the power of Islam.

          One day he invited us to ask him questions. I asked a question that has been worrying me for a long time: "Why do you give such an important place to jihad, if many verses of the Koran speak of reconciliation, love and forgiveness?" The instructor immediately blushed. He seemed to barely control his anger. However, instead of yelling at me, he again tried to clarify his understanding of Islam. “My brother,” he turned to me, “one of the suras of the Koran is called“ Prey ”, but there is no surah in the Koran called“ Reconciliation ”. Jihad and violence are at the core of Islam, and therefore are an integral part of it. "
          A Muslim has only one surefire way to secure heavenly bliss, which explains the actions of Islamic extremists, in particular martyrs. A Muslim will gain eternal life in paradise if he participates in jihad and gives his life in the name of Allah.

          Jihad is a holy war with the enemies of Islam, which will end only when either all infidels or all Muslims are exterminated. The word jihad translates as struggle. Fiqh gives jihad the following definition:

          Jihad means fighting with everyone who opposes the spread of Islam or refuses to accept Islam.
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. +1
            24 October 2014 16: 54
            For the sake of spreading Islam, its adherents are ready to lie and preach that which they themselves do not believe. They are devoted to their religion, and not to the country in which they live.
            Many may challenge my last statement and cite the example of patriotic Muslims living in the United States and Europe. I can only repeat that Muslims do not recognize the power of peoples and states that do not obey the laws of Islam.

            These laws divide countries into two types - Islamic and enemy. Everyone knows that the United States, like most European states, does not recognize the laws of Islam, which means they are considered enemy states.

            Not a single faithful Muslim observing the laws of Islam will defend his homeland contrary to his laws. In this case, the Muslim has no choice. He is obliged to obey only the laws of Islam.

            As an example, many Egyptians, as well as residents of Algeria, Sudan and Saudi Arabia, who, having joined the ranks of extremist groups, refused to fulfill their civic responsibilities. Extremists consider Islam their "blood and flesh."

            All fundamentalist movements prohibit their members from military service. Their leaders believe that countries that refuse to apply Islamic laws to all areas of government should not be protected.
            Mark Gabriel

            ISLAM AND TERRORISM

            (According to the book “Circles on the Water” of the Veer Publishing House, 2005, Charisma House, 2002)
            1. wanderer_032
              +2
              24 October 2014 17: 28
              Quote: Region 23
              For the sake of spreading Islam, its adherents are ready to lie and preach that which they themselves do not believe. They are devoted to their religion.


              If they do not believe in it themselves, they are apostates (infidels-giauras) and are subject to destruction themselves.
              That's it.
              I will add to the above that many so-called "faithful", in fact, do not follow any other dogmas and commandments that Islam preaches, except for "jihad", and even then only because in their understanding, "jihad" is a stupid collective farm robbery, robbery and slave trade , and not a struggle with their inner vices.
              A truly faithful Muslim can only be considered one who, through his example of a righteous life, conducts jihad, turning even giaurs to Islam. The only way.
              And everything else is from Shaitan.
      4. 0
        24 October 2014 17: 01
        Islamic terrorism, in my opinion, arose as a consequence of the aggressive influence of the Christian world on the Arab world. Since the Crusades, when the more progressive Arabs were attacked by the barbarians by the Crusaders, this state of the Arabs was maintained continuously afterwards. The British, the French, and in the twentieth century the Germans and s regularly "bombed" any of the Arabs in the Middle Ages. We continue this glorious tradition in the present century. Drawing an analogy with Christian religions, Islam is in the Middle Ages (remember the extremely humane Inquisition among Catholics and the super-tolerant attitude towards the Old Believers in our country, and if you remember about the baptism of Russia ...) and from this Middle Ages this religion is not allowed to grow, making injections into the cerebellum democratic bombing.
        1. +1
          24 October 2014 22: 03
          Quote: DmitriyDonskoj
          Islam is in the Middle Ages (recall the extremely philanthropic inquisition among Catholics

          Absolutely true thought: Islam is 1200 years old, Christianity at this age was extremely aggressive. We need to wait another 800 years - and everything will settle down (but this is not easier for us).
          While living in a partially Muslim region (in Kazan), I have repeatedly heard from local unkillable Muslims the following version of the faithful’s communication with infidels: a lie for a Muslim is a terrible sin, worse than murder, but a lie in relation to an infidel is not a sin, because the infidel is not a full-fledged person. And from this conclusion: any allegations by Islamic leaders should be questioned, at least (although ours lie just as much, but at least they don’t call for cutting)
      5. +1
        25 October 2014 01: 43
        It’s not true. You don’t have to equalize Islam and terrorism. The Anglo-Saxon corporate identity: Butch is organized in the right region. As long as there is a conflict, radical teaching, sectarianism is being introduced into the local religion, then it is developing and expanding. Wahhabism was introduced by the British to the Arabs. It was done in Galicia where Orthodoxy and the Russians were cleansed. It is not in vain that all the leaders of the Bandera movement and the Fathers and brothers were Greek Catholics, that is, Uniates. If Russia decides to return to Ukraine, then it will be necessary to clean out the Uniate sectarians otherwise it makes no sense to return Ukraine.
        PS anyone interested, http: //communitarian.ru/publikacii/vakhkhabiti/istoriya_sauditov_i_ikh
        _svyazi_s_evreyami_ / http://www.islam.ru/content/analitics/1233
        1. +1
          25 October 2014 07: 44
          Quote: Dilshat
          There is no need to equate Islam and terrorism.

          This is not how the question is posed. If you noticed, the inscription on the picture: not all Muslim terrorists - but - most terrorists are Muslims. Of course, there were (and are) terrorists - the Basques, the Irish, the Red Army (not to be confused!) In the FRG, but these are people who consider terror as a means of political struggle. They organize terrorist acts on the principle: "nothing personal, this is business" (it is clear that this is politics). In the case of Islamic terrorism, we see (I emphasize: we see, since the ulterior motives can be more varied) the execution of terrorist acts motivated by hatred of the "infidels." In both cases, terror is a crime, but in the first it is a crime of a political group and its members (and this group is quite small), in the second, we see (I emphasize again) the millions of supporters and sympathizers behind the terror. Hence the transfer to all of Islam, although this is incorrect.
    4. Gluxar_
      +8
      24 October 2014 14: 35
      Quote: Akvadra
      There are no words! Frantic baboons. Something else about God babbling!

      You need to destroy this mass. But so as to make money on it. My old fix idea is to create a Russian PMC with the possibility of subsequent transformation into an "independent state."
      I believe that in Russia, and in general in the CIS, you can find a lot of sick people with an awl in one place. Including people with military experience who could not find themselves in a peaceful life. To form new "crusaders" out of such people and, by agreement, for example with the Syrian or Iraqi authorities, give them a complete carte blanche to destroy all radicals ... moreover, those who "accepted" the power of these radicals. So to speak, a wedge with a wedge, so that nothing remains but scorched earth. Which will then become the property of this PMC with all that it implies ... and of course there may be sponsors of such a PMC who can arm them with anything and whatever. In my opinion, the time has come ... and over time, such a PMC will be able to work against all kinds of black wooters ...
      1. 0
        24 October 2014 17: 33
        I put you minus. In general, the idea has the right to life. But what you offer is endless warriors, where both sides will be recruiting people using all sorts of methods, such pogogandish technology will work for it! But this is not the worst thing. All this will only lead to the fact that it will become another multi-billion dollar businessless project. And very many on both sides will be interested so that such a warrior doesn’t end when they do not. And for this they will create regulations, laws, and ask for nonsense, which will have to obey.
        and young guys will die and believe what kind of idea. What a world peace. But in fact, they will die for another figure on someone's bank account.
        1. 0
          24 October 2014 20: 47
          There can be no peace without war.
  2. +12
    24 October 2014 13: 21
    And the basis of this, the policy of mattresses - Satan rules America, but wants the whole world.
  3. +11
    24 October 2014 13: 22
    Inhumans. Poison, extinguish, kill - the only way to deal with them.
  4. +8
    24 October 2014 13: 23
    Welcome to the Middle Ages, tolerant European bbs. The time will come and your wives and daughters will get. There is no other way!
  5. +10
    24 October 2014 13: 25
    And who arranged all this ???
    Not a laugh, but better remembered.
    Bastards and ...
  6. +8
    24 October 2014 13: 25
    Even wild animals with their females do not behave this way. In Russia, for such a thing, they tied two bent birches by the legs .. The client said: "grunt" and never again offended the weak.
  7. Viktor Kudinov
    +2
    24 October 2014 13: 27
    And who will not fail to bomb! You can't kill innocents! And not to fulfill the request to "bomb" is also a sin. But these scumbags should be rewarded in full. am
  8. +3
    24 October 2014 13: 28
    This is the real problem for geyrops and mattresses, which urgently needs to be solved, how to stir up politics in dill. Moreover, it is necessary to solve tough, not to take anyone prisoner.
    1. 0
      24 October 2014 17: 21
      This is not a problem for them, and it will not be difficult for them to adopt a law that legitimizes slavery. They will find thousands of reasons, they will create some sort of fashionable group of people who PR it. Then the debate in all media. The song will begin somewhere youth movement, showing that being a slave is cool, they love you, cherish, cherish. The same property, on the principle of who will break an expensive car out of a whim, they take care of it. After 5 years they will legalize on a voluntary basis. I signed a contract to be a slave and that’s it. And in 15-20 years, contracts will not be needed.
  9. +6
    24 October 2014 13: 28
    Righteous anger, what can I say. However, the American public stubbornly ignores such crimes in Donetsk and Lugansk.
  10. DPZ
    +1
    24 October 2014 13: 40
    Yeah. in what century did slavery end? that's horrible.
    1. +8
      24 October 2014 13: 53
      slavery has not ended yet:

      if there is no official slavery, this does not mean that it remained in past centuries, another question is how to deal with it.
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. +2
        24 October 2014 16: 11
        Amazing fate! And where are the writers with filmmakers? Where are human rights organizations?
  11. -8
    24 October 2014 13: 58
    Quote: Region 23
    Maybe terrorism is the result of a distorted understanding of the Qur'an. But after all - it’s precisely the Koran, and not books about Winnie the Pooh. And the sources of this distortion are the most learned Islamic men (ulama), and not illiterate Arab skinheads. The Islamic world is not related to the world of terror by bad students, but by excellent and popular teachers! On such a scale, terrorist preaching is already a disease of the entire Islamic community. And for some reason, if terrorist training centers are found in Russia, Kazakhstan or Uzbekistan, then these centers are more likely to be associated with mosques and madrassas (Muslim seminaries) than with service dog breeding clubs.
    Do terrorists have no religion? But they undoubtedly and firmly believe in the continuation of life after the explosion of their own body. They glorify a very definite God (and this is by no means the name of the great Witzley-Putzli). And the names of their organizations indicate their readiness to fight for Islam, and not for football.

    This is an ordinary Islamic sect, Christians are also full of such sects, just Christian sects take property by deception, not kill. Yes, even look at the Russian Orthodox Church, in large cities it has long been a business. Isil fights not for Islam, but for money. If we go through history, then Christians started the war, Muslims fought among themselves and rarely climbed onto Christian lands. And the abolition of slavery went from the Islamic states. And you’ve just been intimidated already.
    1. +2
      24 October 2014 15: 16
      Quote: Leo7777
      And the abolition of slavery went from Islamic states

      Do not la la, only during the Soviet era, after the war, slavery in the Central Asian republics was practically eliminated.
  12. Jovanny
    +2
    24 October 2014 14: 03
    So girls, enough to chase for moneybags, they won’t save you, the usual ruffles - men, will go to defend their homeland.
  13. +2
    24 October 2014 14: 27
    Yes, everything is so, but you forgot about your neighbors, ours doesn’t even turn out to be called Christians, women and girls are being raped in Ukraine, and this two-faced community is silent, I don’t want anyone to know grief, but I would like so much for these scumbags and those who sponsor them deservedly deserved regardless of creed
  14. +3
    24 October 2014 15: 22
    it is a pity that fools with light brown and red and other hair covered with hijabs do not read it. it’s impossible so that everyone is not legible in their desires and suddenly a hijab. Muslims - Pravorvernye Do you believe these inkwells? !!! I am not ... I am Orthodox (different faith - God is one) inshallah smile
  15. 0
    24 October 2014 16: 40
    Comrade Sukhov, there urgently!
    In general, comrades, there’s only one thing in mind:
    It was the second decade of the 21st century ...
  16. 0
    24 October 2014 16: 53
    yes, bestial customs in the east, since they make such requests.
  17. 0
    24 October 2014 17: 40
    Yeah, really tin as it is, it is not surprising that among women there are suicides-self-demolition workers destroying IS fighters
  18. 0
    24 October 2014 18: 13
    "... what can be considered as war crimes and crimes against humanity", ... "
    And why is the verb "possible" and not "necessary"?
  19. +2
    24 October 2014 18: 58
    The beasts are kind! The Satanists of the West and the World Shaitanat are the enemies of a good person. The wicked one through the mouth of the materialists (Allah punish them!) Imposed the word "atrocity" instead of devilry, obsession and Satanism.
  20. 0
    27 October 2014 08: 50
    Quote: Humpty
    Quote: Leo7777
    And the abolition of slavery went from Islamic states

    Do not la la, only during the Soviet era, after the war, slavery in the Central Asian republics was practically eliminated.

    the abolition of slavery began and eliminated are two different things wink read the story hi