Sailors scolding a new uniform from Yudashkin: "it’s easier to drown" than to take it off in water

20
Sailors scolding a new uniform from Yudashkin: "it’s easier to drown" than to take it off in waterSailors are dissatisfied with the new form developed by a group of fashion designers led by Valentin Yudashkin. According to them, it gives too much attention to appearance and too little attention to comfort and functionality, writes Novaya Gazeta.

Designers replaced working robes from coarse material and bell bottoms, traditionally worn by sailors, with light blue suits made of straight cut jackets, narrowed trousers, or, alternatively, shorts and caps with caps (baseball caps).

“What Yudashkin did was apparently made from the point of view of overall beauty. Something so narrow, tight, and tight. But there’s no point to this. Clothing should be functional,” says second-rank captain, submariner and writer Alexander Pokrovsky.

He explained that wide-cut trousers, firstly, create a layer of water between the body and clothing, if a person falls into the water, and therefore, helps avoid hypothermia. Secondly, if the clothes will interfere in the water, then wide trousers are easy to throw off, while narrow ones should be tied off, taking off your shoes.

"No. Completely remove the pants in the water failed. You can begin to shoot. But it is impossible to completely pull off. Especially difficult - in the area of ​​the ankles, even with absolutely bare legs you can’t pull them off. And if you still have shoes on your feet ... shoes ... In short, it is easier to drown, "- noted Pokrovsky.

"Or here's a different situation. On a submarine, a fire, oddly enough, is worse than water. First of all, ships are burning. And only then they drown. The fact that burning clothes can be easily torn off can save a person’s life. ship ", - added a submariner.

He also commented on poor-quality cloth complaints in the media: "If the threads are rotten, then this is to Menshikov. When he first put the cloth on the fleet, Peter I noticed during the inspection that the cloth was rotten. This is to theft."

"Of course, the sailor cannot be in danger of it - but this form will decay very quickly. We have everything designed for a certain amount of use. If something has exploded and the time must not be written off, then they will not give anything we’ll have to wear rags. Well, if the supply was rotten, it means such an army, "says the submariner. In the past, according to him, sailors dressed in working robes, which were almost impossible to tear.

"Perceived as a scarecrow"

In general, Pokrovsky noted that sailors are extremely conservative in all that relates to appearance: "New clothes are perceived as" scarecrow. "You get used to it with difficulty. But if the form is functional, of course, it is accepted." As an example, he cited the replacement of leather soles for rubber, as the leather slipped.

"Everything that is connected with external signs is perceived as bayonets - some kind of stickers, stripes. Everyone hates sewing them. Mostly they are outraged because of convenience. If you can't run, jump and work in new clothes, then there is no sense in it. The main thing is that the form should be functional, but it will be Yudashkin or someone else - without a difference, "concluded Pokrovsky.

Defense Ministry does not believe that the soldiers are freezing because of Yudashkin

Recall that earlier the scandal because of the new form broke out last winter among the soldiers-conscripts. Then in Siberia mass colds of soldiers stationed there army units were noted. One of the possible explanations for what was happening was the use of a new military uniform designed by fashion designer Valentin Yudashkin, which some people suspected was unable to protect soldiers from frost. But later the Ministry of Defense stated that the “form from Yudashkin” was not related to outbreaks of catarrhal diseases.

In addition, recently it became known that employees of the Federal Agency for Fishery on a par with the military will receive their own uniform and insignia "from Yudashkin." According to some data, Rosrybolovstvo developed sketches of new uniforms for its employees, together with the fashion designer, and on the other, it alone and only plans to turn to him for advice. It is also known that nothing was spent on the development of clothing, but “dressing up” would cost the budget, according to media reports, at least 113 million rubles, excluding special costumes.
20 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Leo848
    0
    6 August 2011 11: 29
    To model and sew for military practice and for a glamorous catwalk - as they say, feel the difference. Show the co-authors of the designer, put on IT and overboard, let them feel on the skin.
    1. LESHA pancake
      0
      7 August 2011 20: 52
      YUDASHKIN DOES NOT MAKE A DIFFERENCE; HE DOES NOT SWIM BEYOND YOUR POOL
  2. uncia uncia
    0
    6 August 2011 14: 02
    And what was the old form bad? Without having been in the shoes of a sailor or a soldier, you will never understand what form means. New technology is good, but not to the detriment of the cause. Just give them, they’ll already war.
  3. Owl
    0
    6 August 2011 16: 20
    what is the country, so is everything else
  4. raf
    +4
    6 August 2011 16: 22
    For these, God forgive me, it’s good for the modelers to sew for queers, so let them sew on them!
  5. mitrich
    0
    6 August 2011 16: 47
    Good girl, RAF! That was my first thought after reading the article! Moreover, in my opinion, looking at domestic fashion designers, they are buggers. Accordingly, they like it when muscular army asses stand out in tight trousers. Ugh, bl..dj!
    In my opinion, the army uniform is not a matter of pride for Russian pederasts! It should be 1) comfortable; 2) wear resistant; 3) applicable to the theater, where we can participate. Remember what, among other things, killed the Germans near Moscow in 1941? FELT BOOTS. They did not know how to wallow them, they were valued taken from our dead gold worth their weight!
    The problem is not beauty, the main thing is to wash your face in time, participating in the database, and shave whenever possible. But this is the concern of commanders, not fashion designers.
    Yes, any member of the Armed Forces will draw the form that he needs! Summarize and create, what is there to fence the garden. Well, at least they introduce shorts, the only spoon of honey in a tar barrel ...
  6. 0
    6 August 2011 16: 57
    mitrich, just these freaks and 1 and the last --- money and money again.
  7. -1
    6 August 2011 18: 17
    Brothers! Sailors and elders! Say thanks to Mr. Yudashkin for not making a uniform for you in the style of the courtiers of Catherine the Great! Then you would know how hard the share of the nobleman! Try to wallow in the water, wearing a wig with letters, a cocked hat, knickers, frill and cane!
  8. 0
    6 August 2011 18: 34
    Remember what happened at the May 9th parade. Complete humiliation of the military. Dressed so that you won’t understand where the officer is, where the other military officer. What kind of troops can’t be figured out. They thought of a single pursuit to wear on the belly. While all civil servants show off in officer uniforms, although they do not belong to the military at all.
    They don’t know what they are doing.
    1. 0
      7 August 2011 03: 24
      There are still epaulettes on the sleeves, but this is if they wear a bronler.
  9. 0
    6 August 2011 19: 21
    SorryFOR YOUR FAVORITES YOURSELVES NOTHING.
  10. mitrich
    0
    6 August 2011 19: 38
    Just like 09.05.2011/XNUMX/XNUMX - our army should look like - this is my deep conviction. It remains only to make the uniform comfortable to wear ...
    1. 0
      6 August 2011 20: 22
      Maybe on the battlefield, yes, on exercises. But not at the parade, on Victory Day.
  11. dimon34
    0
    7 August 2011 01: 27
    let it sew for fagots !!! and for Serdyukov !!!! hands off the army !!!
  12. 0
    7 August 2011 01: 28
    Guys, it’s all wrong with MO x ... If the army said-it’s secured! Yudashkin has already received his grandmothers, and the rest does not eat him ... eats.
  13. +2
    7 August 2011 03: 33
    Although I did not wear the Yudashkin uniform during the service, they started bringing in new recruits through the call after mine, but in the winter after the march-throw before the oath, when there was -30 C, I grabbed pneumonia, if I were alone, okay, but I was first, then the whole KMB got sick, and then another 1 \ 3 part, they made our barracks a ward where everyone was lying with a temperature under 40, partly they quarantined healthy people from our KMB, and this 10 man was transferred to another barracks. And this is because in -30 we were dressed in quilted jackets + pea jackets, run 6 km to the training ground, all wet as pigs came running and stood under -30 frost in an awesomely strong wind + to run back. The form is not Yudashkin, but a general disease due to the headache of the command unit.
    1. Siberian
      +3
      7 August 2011 11: 45
      In your case, Draz, the form (old or Yudashkin) is not to blame. There is the headyness of your commanders. To make march throws in a 30-degree frost in quilted jackets and pea jackets is complete insanity. I declare this responsibly, because he served (and still serve) 30 years, and not on the floor.
      1. +1
        7 August 2011 17: 56
        So we are talking about the fact that we have gnarls, but they can easily blame Yudashkin, so you need to carefully understand.
  14. +1
    7 August 2011 07: 59
    The shape must be functional. I don’t watch fashion shows, but I wouldn’t put a citizen of Mr. Yudashkin in the face. But I grabbed cabbage I think unnecessarily. Interestingly, but he was in Red?
    1. svvaulsh
      +1
      7 August 2011 14: 40
      I was not in Red, I was in Blue!
  15. +5
    7 August 2011 10: 12
    What are all the "military" here! What an old shape that's comfortable!
    So you would feel her "convenience" on your own skin! So that those who talk about "non-radio" can run around in a "comfortable" dark blue robe in the sun. Moreover, in the boots "reptiles", which are worn only by sailors and convicts. Now to the facts: pneumonia and bronchitis were the most common diseases in the summer period in the Anapa training school of the frontier troops (then the KGB of the USSR). We wore a uniform covered from collar to toe with salt streaks. Then everything is just a draft-hospital (how they treated it, a separate song). Summer dress uniforms were accompanied by "comfortable" all-season trousers made of cloth - an extremely "comfortable" thing in the heat. Do you want to vilify in the heat on Moscow avenues? Plus a soiled white long-sleeved Dutch woman, under which in any heat you have to wear a striped T-shirt, plus a perky beautiful and equally uncomfortable peakless cap. It is only in our army that a head without a "hat" is considered empty. But in the United States, they somehow give honor even without a "skullcap" on their heads. Ah, these maritime traditions ...... They must be watched.
    Probably from this attitude to the "sailor" and formed our hatred of the officers, whom we did not call other than "Hans". Therefore, go, you are a citizen of Pokrovsky Cavtorang with your traditions forest!
    PS During the entire service period, neither I nor anyone else from my "box" fell overboard. And if I fell, the first thing I did was get rid of the pood "reptiles" on my feet, if I could untie the "comfortable" laces. any pants are no problem.
  16. Makcum
    0
    19 December 2012 23: 15
    I agree, I wore it myself - honorably (brought up) gave a lot for the mind. One thing gets in the way in the dress pants, of course it's hot in summer. For the rest: is the purpose of the changes clear or not? And then house 2 of some kind turns out - tired of it, we will do that. And the "expert", of course, is also ...

    And yet, Yudashkin and others, I (if that) do not like very