Does Russia have a “B” plan for Ukraine?
Plan "A" was, apparently, to protect the Russian and Russian-speaking in the east of Ukraine by military means, not allowing the executions and killings of civilians. He was refused, fearing either sanctions or acute nationalism of the rest of Ukraine’s inhabitants, especially among young people. It seems that the fears of a big war played a role. And now what?
Civilians are shot and killed, the troops of the eastern regions are retreating, unable to resist the heavy machinery of the enemy. Long they are unlikely to hold out.
Russia is imbued with the desire to stay away, wants to stay white and fluffy. Maybe Russia hopes that the war, lack of money and rising prices in Ukraine itself will turn Ukrainians away from the war and they will sit at the negotiating table? If so, then Russia is mistaken in the quality of those forces that are moving the war forward.
The more clearly we imagine our opponents and their intentions, the more we can say how they will act. The clearer will be our own actions.
В stories there are moments when its flow acquires a completely new stream, guided by new, unexpected forces, fed by unusual ideas. At first, everyone takes aback, and everyone refuses to believe that movement has other sources. Neglect this reality. Only a lot of victims of this, they regret that they did not appreciate in time, did not understand and did not take urgent, correct measures. At first, Hitler underestimated many and did not understand. So it is now: the arrival of the Nazis in Ukraine is a new and very dangerous reality.
1. The intentions of the Americans.
Does Russia truly understand the main actor of this theater - the USA? America wants hegemony. Without Eurasia, this will not work. She needs control of her. Therefore, the dreams of the Russian elite that their close ties with American firms will lead to a plexus of elites, and the Americans will no longer disturb Russia, are frivolous. This is the naivety of Gaddafi, who hoped that by sharing his oil riches with America, he would save the country and get a quiet life. They took everything from him.
Support for anti-Russian sentiments in all formerly formerly friendly republics, building missile defense around Russia, organizing orange revolutions in the post-Soviet space, supporting fundamentalists in the Caucasus, forming and supporting nationalist radicals in Ukraine ... Doesn't all these approaches indicate that there are bad intentions towards Russia? America in Russia needs chaos, that is, unrest, and war is better.
The war will draw on huge resources, tighten sanctions, and all this will overthrow the economy and exhausts the country. Prices will rise, there will be a shortage of many goods, there will be wounded and dead, there will be provocations, arson. A regime that is not able to cope with all this quickly will start to cause discontent among people, and even mistrust. You can play with this - to organize one or another version of the Orange Revolution, a coup, raise a minority through provocations and, as a result, divide, break Russia so that it will never have its voice again.
Nationalist Ukraine is an American project. They raised Ukrainian Nazis just as they had previously cultivated Muslim fundamentalists in the Arab world. And who else can be cultivated, who himself would have sought to go to war? Only such radicals.
Obviously, by putting only Ukraine under the rule of the fascist radicals, America is not closing its project on this. Why did American advisers occupy a whole floor in the house of the Ukrainian government? Maybe their desire to lead Ukraine to prosperity? Not? Then what for? Chaos in the face of the nationalists should go to Russia, and America confidently promotes this plan.
Look: at that moment, when peaceful protest rallies began to gather in the east of Ukraine in connection with the ban of the Russian language, and Russia warned that military methods of resolving the conflict would cause its violent opposition, the nationalists did not immediately overcome their timidity. It was also possible to resolve controversial issues peacefully, and who would like to get involved in a military conflict with Russia? At that moment, the Americans did not declare that they would withdraw their recognition of the Ukrainian regime back, God knows what sanctions would be imposed on Ukrainians, and so on; just so that there is no military conflict, so that the dispute can be resolved peacefully. In this direction, they did not even think about taking decisive steps.
Moreover, the Americans and pushed the situation to the conflict, saying that Ukraine has the right to maintain its integrity by military means. It was good to use force. It is also clear that without the consent of America, the nationalists would not dare to conflict. Someone had to cover their backs. And great uncle Sam agreed, and the henchmen rushed to fight. Even without attempting any negotiations, they invited their own heads of the eastern regions for the sake of appearance, but did not invite the leaders of the protesters.
Notice, Uncle Sam lets the fascists into the eastern regions of Ukraine in the full understanding that the chances of a Russian force repulse are very high. This is America arranged. Why? How can a war arrange? Mind is incomprehensible! Such a serious matter as a war can suit, if there is an important reason in it. There must be an important reason, a certain serious intention. So what? No other intention is visible. Through the war between Ukraine and Russia, this would bring chaos and the weakening of Russia.
Chaos to Russia! For this, the Ukrainian Nazis are very convenient - they are so furious in their hatred of the Russians, and every day of the war they will scream about the Russian atrocities, enrage the Ukrainians and recruit more and more new supporters into their ranks - you can make a big mess with them. In the Crimea, you can also make provocations with the Tatars, and they will start to worry and fight, then you can try to raise their brothers from the Volga region. You can try to raise so all Muslims in Russia. It’s not bad to kill some Russians, to shove it at the Muslims, so that in Russia their own nationalists would rise. In the Russian media, however, to demand the resignation of the regime that allowed such chaos, to set in motion the fifth column and to revive the clans' struggle for power, promising them anything. The prospects for Russia are unenviable.
Bringing war to Russia is not scary for America: Americans do not fight themselves, Ukrainians are fighting. If now the nationalists smash the militias, then the Americans will make another attempt - they will move them to the Crimea. As moved to the east of Ukraine. Or something does not suit them in this?
In thoughts of this can not be allowed? On the contrary: is it possible in politics to allow such children's thoughts that the Americans, who for many years nurtured the nationalists in Ukraine, brought them with hard labor, breaking everything and everyone, shutting up the entire world press, to power, without any doubt, threw them into bloody with all the horrors, the slaughter in the east against the Russians (!) already, and now, having a legal and such bloated reason for discord between Ukraine and Russia as the Crimea, will suddenly become moral and good and stop? Where did you see the Americans stop halfway? Nowhere was this. They persist, like ants, roll the wheel of their intentions to the end.
From this it is necessary to proceed.
2. The intentions of the nationalists of Ukraine.
So who will have to confront Russia? The Russians, like all normal people, poorly understand the nationalists, they do not even understand them at all. Meanwhile, the Nazis are special people; because they have their own particular idea. She sent all their actions. See ...
Why did the war start? Because of the unwillingness to provide the state status of the Russian language with Russian and Russian-speaking eastern regions. The nationalists do not want to have anything Russian in Ukraine — this is the point and foundation of everything.
This must finally be fully realized.
To admit Russian as the state language means to recognize the existence of Russians on equal rights in Ukraine, and this is Nazi as a bone in the throat, which is why in the Rada nationalists fought against this for years.
The Russians in the east started talking about their rights, about some kind of federalization - at last there is a reason to drive and fight them. Issues such as federalization, delineation of rights, taxation could be calmly and thoroughly resolved through negotiations, all the more so since the east did not refuse it. But this was just not necessary, but it was necessary to start chasing the Russians. None of the Nazis wanted real talks, that was what was seen. And the nationalists are fighting. They are fighting according to their racist, misanthropic doctrine - they shoot heavy weapons at residential areas of civilians, use forbidden phosphorus bombs, finish off the wounded, leave cities without electricity and water, do not allow any humanitarian corridors.
There is not a single gram of high in Nazi ideas. The Nazis are not patriots. Was Hitler a patriot? No, I was not. He brought the destruction of Germany and the death of millions of Germans. Many people say that if Hitler did not burn the Jews, did not go to war with other countries, he would have remained with his successes in uniting Germany, and at its rise would have been honored by a great man. If ... Such people forget that the essence of Nazism and the aspirations of Hitler was just to destroy the Jews and put the Germans over other nations; conquer them, and strong Germany was only a condition for this.
The idea of patriotism is to unite all forces, all peoples of the country for its good and prosperity, and the idea of the Nazis to persecute, destroy “strangers”, whatever the cost: let even your whole country go to fire, come to ruin or fall into tartar.
No matter how incomprehensible and inhuman such a philosophy of nationalists is for a normal person, it is the place to be in our time. As a rule, it is armed with impaired people, with complexes. Without having in themselves normal, human virtues, which they could show to people and thus assert themselves, it remains for them to appeal only to their nationality, recognizing its exclusivity. They see the exclusivity of their nation in that it is stronger than other nations, so they claim its superiority by starting to drive and destroy other “subhumans”. The more they drive them, the better they do it, the more their self-affirmation, the more they are satisfied with themselves. That is their meaning. Hence all their abominations - irrationality of behavior, inhumanity, war and the cruelties that they do on it.
3. Danger from the state of the nationalists.
In Ukraine, a nationalist state is formed, which is exclusively hostile to the Russians and is ready to fight them. Nazi in Ukraine is not really so little. Some people believe that the Nazis are only those that were organized into paramilitary units in the camps of western Ukraine and that they go with Bandera banners deployed. No, it is not. All large, formerly opposition parties, are nationalist parties. What did they do, what did they live with? Look carefully at each step of these parties, and you will see that it is dictated by nationalist doctrine, and not by considerations of patriotism, humanism or gain.
They fought against the state status of the Russian language. To speak your own language is a legitimate, important right of self-identification of a person. It is clear that the more the scope of the native language is narrowed, the more a person is afraid of losing his language and the membership in his nation. Therefore, whenever possible, multinational states give the greatest freedoms to languages. In any case, very carefully and gradually approach the changes in the scope of languages, where it is really necessary. Switzerland, where there are four state languages, could not survive if the infringement of some languages in favor of one of them began. Yet the efforts of the nationalists went to the infringement of the Russian. That Russians will feel at the same time infringed upon — so this is the goal of the Nazis.
From their submission, Bandera became a hero of Ukraine, but they changed the school curriculum, where in the textbooks they exhibited Russian enemies. Now they are in a hurry to re-elect the parliament, since it still has deputies from other parties who have a cold skin from the measures proposed by the government of the national radicals, and they are trying to object. Such a Nazi parliament is not needed, just as the Communists were not needed in it, which they had already driven out. It only needs its guys. Who else did in history? For whom were the principles of democracy not so holy? This is the mood of these parties, their ideas, that they lived and live. They will not say: fascism is good, but they will say - beat Moskal, that is, Russian. But beat Moskal-this is fascism.
That's who we are dealing with.
In fact, how many Nazis in Ukraine, a lot or a little - is not so important, but it is important that they are at the helm and determine the policy of the country. All actions of a country are determined by their interests, and all people fulfill their requirements. There are liberals and other dissenters in Ukraine, but they don’t even try to proclaim any moderate policy, knowing that they will be immediately accused of non-patriotism and sympathy for the Muscovites. They are forced to support all ultranationalist measures, and this will continue until the Nazis are in power. In Hitler's Germany, too, not all were convinced Nazis, but acted as demanded by Hitler and his henchmen. Therefore, the country was characterized as Nazi.
Unfortunately, Russia’s turn away from the ideas and goals of the Nazis, including from the war, now has no way. See:
mothers are not allowed anywhere in the war of sons, so it is at first, then the feeling of fear for their sons will be replaced by a feeling of revenge and there will be no maternal pickets.
But the Ukrainian sons are already going, fighting, attacking, and even occupying cities. Ukrainian sons confuse nationalism with patriotism. But the Germans also fought with Russia - not for the ideals of Nazism, but for the defense of Germany - they were inspired by the danger of Russian Bolshevism. Ukrainians instilled the danger of Russian despotism.
There are a lot of deserters in the Ukrainian army, this is also not an indicator. There are always deserters - do they run away from weakness from war and the dangers of war? But there are few of those who run from what they consider wrong to fight against their own people, against the Russian brothers. This mood is massively not. The war is still perceived as a defense of the Fatherland from the separatists and Muscovites. There is no general escape, as in the Russian army in the 17 year of the last century. Despite the desertion, the army of Ukraine is growing.
Perhaps the difficulties of an economic nature — rising prices, interruptions in heating, a shortage of products, increased unemployment, will turn people away from war, make them look for peace? Also no. Indignation will pour out on the government, but not on war. Government can change. But new leaders will come, the same nationalists, and the war will continue. All the warring nations at all times tightened their belts, but the war continued. She was a matter of honor, and this is what victims of war and Ukrainian propaganda do.
Perhaps, with all the hatred of the nationalists, it will be possible to negotiate with them for peace on some rational conditions? Convince them? Don't they see that by pushing Russia away from themselves, they lose a lot of benefits and create great difficulties for their country and people? But the Nazis throw profit and rationality overboard - they tear all ties, all contracts with Russia, they don’t even want to discuss the gas contract. Hurry up to introduce economic sanctions. Act on the principle - let us be worse, but we will make you bad. Obviously, this is a matter of principle for them. And this is true - this principle of hatred towards others is dictated to them by their ideology, which requires, for the sake of the superiority of their own nation, to hate others and act irrationally. This horrible ideology everywhere turns the Nazis into something terrible. With them it is impossible to agree on anything, unless by force. If in Germany today you approach the Nazis and start a conversation with him about the rights of Turks to reside in Germany, he will not talk to you, but will simply strike you with a fist. And in Germany, no one talks to them. Already in today's Germany, “civilized” fascists also throw Molotov cocktails into the Turks' houses without any repentance and trepidation, as Bandera in Ukraine burn people and throw phosphorous bombs. The Nazis are the same everywhere. They hate the idea that people are equal, and therefore do not want to negotiate on equal terms.
Not only this, since even with the support of America, this state will also be directed by an external force to war with the Russians. In the war with the Russians, America will tie many Ukrainian generations with a special hatred of Russians. The Nazis hated and hated Russia and so, without war. But war will infuse this poison of hatred into all of society. Every day, Ukrainian mothers will receive funerals, which will be accused of damned Muscovites who create atrocities and who want to break Ukraine. Russia can try not to interfere in Ukraine as much as it does — it will not help it. No one will believe that she is not at war. Even if the opinion is such that Russia itself is not at war, it definitely supports the accursed separatists and therefore must be hated. Funerals and propaganda will do their work.
Ukrainians will turn away from war only when people start to believe that war is unfair, is not needed. But there is no way to convince the Ukrainians. They have no Russian propaganda.
Russia has no chance to change the attitude to the war and to itself inside Ukraine either by its mild behavior, neither by propaganda, nor by conviction. Do not change this and the economic situation of the Ukrainians.
There are no chances to change the mood for the war in Ukraine, so the Ukrainian Nazis have a confident game in their hands - wherever they want, they can finally take revenge from Russia. In the language. In history. In the culture. In the domestic business. In the external business. In submission to the east of Ukraine. In Crimea. The path is free - the people are with them. And they are eager for everything, act, and they act. If only it was infringement of Russia. If only it was Russian pain. Look at how they are fighting in the east of Ukraine, no matter how inhuman and fierce they wage hostilities, using all illegal ammunition and weapons of mass destruction against the civilian population, what they have at hand, not allowing any humanitarian corridors.
Seeing such sentiments, it is unnecessary to ask whether they want to take revenge from Russia for the Crimea. Yes, they do. Burn with desire.
Maybe they will be afraid? Not. The Nazis are irrational in their hatred of Russia, this one thing. The other, with America, with the support of the entire West, and there really is one, the Nazis are not afraid of anything. The West will give guarantees of support, has already given. Why not give it, because the West itself is not going to fight; it will give mercenaries and equipment, the benefit of both is full.
4. Europe is a weak map for us.
Can Europe have a big business with Russia, including gas, to contribute to the pacification of the parties? That is unlikely. Europe is strategically linked with America in terms of geopolitical goals - it supports the weakening of any country capable of somehow resisting the United States. Acting according to the rule - a big partner will get a lot, but something will be transferred to us.
In this bundle, Europe does not have independence. If America has serious intentions for someone, then none of the Europeans, no matter how great the short-term benefits would be, will not challenge America and will not oppose. Individual countries have deviations from the line set by Washington, but not opposition.
But most importantly, Europe looks at Russia in geopolitical terms with the same eyes as America, here they have no differences. Europe sees Russia as a rival, and it will be satisfied if Russia disintegrates into a number of small states. For this, she agrees to survive the loss of part of her business with Russia, so the chances of promoting the Old World to the peaceful outcome of the Ukrainian war dissolve into haze.
Europe, if she suddenly wants to keep her business in Russia, that is, with the best scenario for Russia, can only ask the Americans to keep her gas contract with Russia, and to do this reconcile the parties to the conflict, but insist on it with real means not. America will not listen to her, and the nationalists of Ukraine are instigated by America and only obey her.
Nationalists, as was noted, are not patriots, otherwise they would have become friends with Russia, this is beneficial. But the main thing for them is to drive and shoot Russians, and therefore the gas business is not an argument for them. For the Nazis for the sake of gas to put up with the Russians - do not respect yourself. The nationalists are planning to sell this gas business to Americans and Europeans altogether, but on the stormy run-up to the war, this business looks risky and unattractive to these businesses.
Still, there is a very small chance that Europe will persuade America and the Nazis to leave the gas business to her is - too good business for her. We must still keep in mind that America has no direct interest in gas for Europeans. Therefore, America, and especially the Nazis, if they come down to Europe, will do it only so that for Russia this business is the most minimally profitable. America and the Nazis know that in Europe there are more expensive gas substitutes, diesel fuel, for example, let it take them, Europe can live without gas, why indulge it? Therefore, Russia cannot use gas, blocking its access as an ultimatum.
We must be aware that the era of a good gas business has already gone through Ukraine, and if the gas business continues, it will be an era of difficult, low-profit contracts. Only in this way Russia will save this business.
It should be noted that if Russia had the idea that its non-intervention in the east of Ukraine would be appreciated by Ukraine, would remove the motives of angryness, cause location and the gas business would be saved, then Russia miscalculated. Such an idea should be considered childish; if it was, then because of the misconception of the nature of the opponents and their intentions.
Nazis as Nazis grew angry with Russia and pacify them - only to give them back their heat. Trying to defend the former gas business by some kind of negotiations in the context of the new reality in Ukraine is already unrealistic.
5. The main interests of Russia.
When you do not see active assistance from Russia for Novorossia, you think that Russia wants to stay away from the conflict. The question is, what are Russia's real interests in relation to Ukraine?
With a strong aggressively hostile state on its border, which also enjoys the strongest international support in its claims, Russia fundamentally cannot. It already cost her the whole business there and the thousands of Russians killed. But it could cost her her own existence.
Russia must finally give up the illusions and see the nature and intentions of the forces that came to power in Ukraine - the Americans and the Nazis. Give yourself an account of what they want and will fight with her. And this, combined with the speeches of internal enemies, can lead to the loss of the former statehood and the dismemberment of Russia. She needs to act accordingly and decisively.
In Russia, it is precisely the underestimation of the character of the forces that came to power in Ukraine. It would be possible to put up with the coming to power of the liberals or any other forces as a result of the Maidan. These forces would also be inclined to greater interaction with the West, but, because of their rationality and understanding of the benefits of cooperation with Russia, they would not break all ties and instigate Ukrainians on the Russians. One could count on some kind of acceptable interaction. But the Nazis came to power, people with the installation of "beat the Russians." It is a completely different matter. The situation unfolds in 180 degrees. These will look for harm to Russia, wherever possible, and it’s impossible to agree with that. Here intervention is required, one must forget about neutrality.
Meanwhile, Moscow’s neutrality emphasizes that it wants to reach an agreement with Ukraine and that the government is civilized there. When it comes to understanding that this is not so? What is impossible to agree and therefore there is nothing to negotiate? What other victims and misfortunes are we expecting? The sooner the correct estimate comes, the better.
The task of Russia to the maximum: to return all Ukraine to its sphere of influence, so that there is no nationalist state hostile to us on the border. Leaving it in the hands of the junta, we will always have such a state.
The more provocations and bloodshed the nationalists will do, the more they will accuse Russia of this, inciting hatred towards us of their people. The more people they have at their disposal, and the more they will be hated by Russians, the greater the troubles and provocations will be. Therefore, there remains a smaller task, if there is not enough power for the main one, it is to tear off as many Russians and Ukrainians as possible from this poisonous campaign who still want to live in peace with Russia and believe that Russia is not their enemy.
This is very important, since it will make it clear to every Russian that Russia is behind its own and will not leave them, no matter where they are. There is no difference for the Russians: are they in the Crimea or in the east of Ukraine - both are protected. The Russians held together, and if the government neglects this, it will lose credibility, will come out of trust, and the collapse of the Fatherland will be.
A buffer is created between Russia and hostile Ukraine, and chaos will not be brought to Russia immediately. The larger and stronger this buffer, the better.
This is the only way to ever make the union of Ukraine a legal way, like reunification, if the Nazi regime staggers, and not by invasion. In what form it will be possible to implement, through unitarism or federalization, the future will show.
We can not expect that NATO will not deliver its missile defense system in Ukraine over time, and subsequently troops. The further we can push it, the better.
Hence the conclusion: Russia does not want or cannot fight now, but then there should be such support for the militia to ensure that they win. Ukraine conducts full-scale army operations there, with a lot of heavy equipment, and it is possible to resist them only with a lot of heavy equipment and a large number of militiamen, and not with small detachments with small arms.
It may also happen that it will be clearly revealed that with any support from the militia they cannot stand against the Ukrainian armies, then Russia itself will have to fight. After all, if the militia will not take their cities again, the Ukrainian Nazis will come to the Crimea. We'll have to go to the Russian army to defend their territory.
6. Russia at a crossroads.
Russia does not help the militia, is afraid of the wrath of America? Apparently, it is. Because only by the fear of sanctions can one explain the proposals that came from the HSE: we must surrender Novorossia in return for promises not to conquer the Crimea, preserve the gas contracts and some acceptable mutual relations with Ukraine.
What can I say?
America knows perfectly well that Russians and Ukrainians have common roots, always with difficulties stood together shoulder to shoulder, that these are fraternal peoples and that Russia has a legitimate interest that no one Ukrainians take it from. But America bought most of the Ukrainian elite, prozombirovat nationalism brains of Ukrainians. Now that the nationalists are in power, there is an opportunity not only to tear the Ukrainians away from the Russians, but also to make them forever hostile to each other. Now the whole deal is whether the Russians will chase the junta and bring the Ukrainians back to friendship or leave the booty to America. For Americans, it does not matter whether the militia forces chase the junta or the Russian army will do it. For them, this is all Moscow. With annoyance that did not pass, they will impose sanctions to the fullest.
If Russia does not take the Ukrainians back under its influence, then America, knowing that Russia in Ukraine has its own legitimate interests and has not stood for them, will understand that Russia is weak and afraid. America will take into account the fear of Russia. Fear of sanctions and war, and try and then, and more in reaching the Crimea. Result: again sanctions on full plus war. Sanctions will be so and so, and we will lose more concessions than we will find.
But let's see how the nationalists react to this proposal. The rebels can not claim that the whole of New Russia is firmly in their hands. But the nationalists strongly believe that the eastern regions will not last long and will soon fall into their hands. The Nazis can promise not to go to the Crimea and save gas contracts in exchange for Novorossia, but for them there will not be the subject of a contract here - they just get what they would get. Why, then, should their promises be valid? What for? These will be empty promises. The Nazis, like America, respect force and nothing else, and neither the militia nor Russia have shown any strength here yet. Such a treaty in the eyes of the Nazis is just a concession, a weakness on the part of Russia, and, consequently, a reason for even greater pressure and further advancement of armies.
Do not want Russia to war? Of course, I do not want. But if the enemy really wants to fight with you, then how to get out of it? No The enemy will get you everywhere and you will not get rid of the fight. His intention to fight dictates the course of events here, and not your any good wishes. How Russia didn’t want to fight in Chechnya against Wahhabi radicals! And even make peace with them Khasavyurt world. But the Wahhabis wanted to continue to fight and in a couple of months they attacked in Dagestan, and so what? I had to fight again. Force has to oppose force, there is no other choice. Neither America nor the Nazis want peace (otherwise it would have been a long time ago) - will they, then, choose and leave Russia a choice?
Russia's position is unenviable; she does not want war, and concessions will not cause reconciliation.
America and the Ukrainian Nazis believe that it is fighting, because they believe that Moscow is helping the militia. For them, the weakness of the militias is the weakness of Moscow. This is bad. It only provoke the enemy. But this is doubly bad, because he is Russian everywhere, and if they fight with him, then they fight with Russia, and this is clear to everyone. Like it or not, and not to support your own - this is a weakness. Inevitably there is discontent with his government, the degree of trust in it falls. This should not be neglected.
Now, if the militia circle smashed the Nazis, the situation would have looked much better. One could not hope that for some reason the enemy would deign to be propitiated, stop chasing the Russians and not make big claims, including the Crimea, but call for accountability for the victims and damage, dictate their own conditions. The only way to defend the Russians in Ukraine, their property there, the property and business of Russia in Ukraine, including gas contracts, is not to be weak. Is it not clear that no "soft" methods against such opponents as America and the Nazis will take any action?
7. Recent comments on the fight.
In the West, frankly, there are calls to influence the oligarchs to call Putin to order. Russian oligarchs-who are they for? Do they have property abroad, will they want to lose it because of Ukraine and Putin? America threatened the loss of foreign assets withdrew Ukrainian oligarchs to the Maidan — that is what overthrew Yanukovych. She will try the same move in Russia. Oligarchs should be borne in mind that, on the one hand, by overthrowing Putin, they do not make their states safer, but finally put them under the control of America, on the other hand, how much will America honor their merits, based on its geopolitical goal to take all Russia i.e. their states too? In any case, it is necessary to specifically help every oligarch at least save a part of the foreign state.
Get ready for sanctions soon, they will be complete. America will not move its troops to Ukraine. But sanctions are her war for her; and she will not stand on ceremony.
Russia will not have access to foreign loans, and will be arrested for deposits abroad. Russia will remain without the most important resource - money. Withdraw money now. There will be a ban on foreign exchange transactions - transfer dollars and euros into gold and yuan now. Take advantage of the experience of Iran.
It cannot be that there are no people inside Ukraine who would not stand for fraternity and friendship with the Russians and not hate the fascists. Help them in the organization of resistance!
There must be a discredit of the ideas of nationalism. The younger generation has no idea about this. We must show that the authorities in Ukraine do not shout about their fascism explicitly so as not to frighten foreign liberals, but each of its actions is not patriotic, but dictated by the Nazi doctrine, exclusively the interest of hostility to another nation, which is fascism.
Information