Military Review
Sign In Register

At the shipyard STX France, the process of docking of "Sevastopol" has begun

51
Strategy and Technology Analysis Center Blog reports that on July 21, the French shipbuilding enterprise STX France began the process of docking of the stern and fore parts of the amphibious assault ship Sevastopol under construction for the Russian Navy.



"Sevastopol" is the second ship of the "Mistral" type, which is being built for the Russian Navy in Saint-Nazaire under a contract signed on June 17 2011 of the year. The stern of the ship was built in St. Petersburg at the "Baltic Shipyard - Shipbuilding." She was launched on 30 on April 2014 of the year and towed to Saint-Nazaire on July 14.

The process of docking and finishing the hull in the dry construction dock of the STX France shipyard will last until October 2014, after which the finished hull of the Sevastopol will be lowered into the water. The contract provides that the ship will be transferred to the Russian Navy 1 on November 2015.
Photos used:
http://bmpd.livejournal.com/
Military Reviewin Yandex News
Military Reviewin Yandex Zen
51 comment
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. inkass_98
    inkass_98 22 July 2014 13: 22
    +8
    Let’s take a look, in the light of recent events, certain doubts arise regarding the timing of the transfer of this ark to Russia.
    1. mamont5
      mamont5 22 July 2014 13: 23
      +24
      Quote: inkass_98
      Let’s take a look, in the light of recent events, certain doubts arise regarding the timing of the transfer of this ark to Russia.


      The French clearly hope that by November next year all problems will resolve. In short, either the emir will die, or the donkey.
      1. Roman1970
        Roman1970 22 July 2014 13: 27
        +1
        Quote: mamont5
        Quote: inkass_98
        Let’s take a look, in the light of recent events, certain doubts arise regarding the timing of the transfer of this ark to Russia.


        The French clearly hope that by November next year all problems will resolve. In short, either the emir will die, or the donkey.

        I think it will be so, but for now you can chat with your tongue, appease the USA ...
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. Russ69
        Russ69 22 July 2014 13: 56
        +5
        Oland said today that Vladivostok will be handed over, and Sevastopol is already in question. They will look at how much GDP will be obedient ... And, given our current weak-willed policy, we will most likely get ... smile
        1. K-50
          K-50 22 July 2014 15: 03
          +5
          Quote: Russ69
          Oland said today that Vladivostok will be handed over, and Sevastopol is already in question. They will look at how much GDP will be obedient ... And, given our current weak-willed policy, we will most likely get ... smile

          Then France gets on not weak money, while its industry is not loaded and will receive an increase in unemployment.
          And taking into account the possibility of building two more such troughs, the voters will not be very happy, and I also put it mildly, and they will have elections soon.
          1. vladmetro
            vladmetro 22 July 2014 15: 27
            +3
            With the current round of the crisis in Europe, I think you shouldn't worry about the Mistrals.
            They will give, they will not go anywhere.
            To fall for such money is equal to suicide.
            And NATO, as expected-France’s horseradish will boil them :)
          2. voliador
            voliador 23 July 2014 00: 27
            0
            Not just not happy. Thousands of skilled workers - no wages! And go ahead of us, explain to them that this is what they need! laughing
        2. Gomunkul
          Gomunkul 22 July 2014 16: 16
          +1
          Oland said today that Vladivostok will be handed over, and Sevastopol is already in question. Will watch


          "The deal was signed in 2011, the ship is almost ready and should be handed over in October," François Hollande said at a meeting with reporters. There can be no question of disrupting the delivery of this helicopter carrier, the French leader noted, adding that otherwise France would have to pay a penalty of 1,1 billion euros.

          But as for the construction of the second Mistral-class helicopter carrier, "it will depend on Russia's behavior," the French president said. "I say this very clearly," added François Hollande. "However, at this stage, no decisions have been made on sanctions that could force us to abandon this."
          According to the president, if such restrictions on Moscow are nevertheless introduced, this "will have to happen at the level of the European Union and will only concern future supplies of equipment," ITAR-TASS reports.
        3. The comment was deleted.
      4. inkass_98
        inkass_98 22 July 2014 14: 31
        +1
        Quote: mamont5
        In short, either the emir will die, or the donkey.

        Nasruddin is still forgotten laughing .
      5. Alekseev
        Alekseev 22 July 2014 15: 00
        +4
        Quote: mamont5
        hope that by November next year all problems will resolve.

        Yes, and eat a fish, and ... Mistral to cash in.
        F. Holland probably already got the unwanted Russian no good.
        I went to the trick: they say, we will give one in any way on time, the second, they say, we'll see.
        Ours must answer: we will definitely pay for one, if you transfer the second on time. laughing
    2. nikrandel
      nikrandel 22 July 2014 13: 26
      +6
      It is necessary to return all military production to Russia, and then no one will doubt the execution of defense orders, plus thousands of jobs.
      1. svetlomor
        svetlomor 22 July 2014 13: 37
        +5
        Quote: nikrandel
        It is necessary to return all military production to Russia, and then no one will doubt the execution of defense orders, plus thousands of jobs.

        There are pros and cons, during the Union such ships were built in in Nikolaev, now you have to actually start from scratch, thousands of jobs, only where to get workers, then the gastors won't roll.
    3. volodyk50
      volodyk50 22 July 2014 13: 50
      +5
      There, penalties are prescribed in case of deadlines, and the French said that the implementation of this contract should be unconditional.
    4. makarick
      makarick 22 July 2014 13: 54
      +1
      Today it was announced on TV that the French President said the transfer of the second ship would depend on Russia's attitude (position) to the conflict in Ukraine.
    5. Alexan
      Alexan 22 July 2014 16: 09
      +2
      As one clever man said: “If they pass it on, it's good, but if they don't pass it on, it's even better!
      The money is more complete and it is nice to receive a fine for non-fulfillment. "Competent military men, even under Taburetkin, proved the dubious need for a" barn. "
  2. Vreonosec
    Vreonosec 22 July 2014 13: 22
    +5
    A good ship ... but damn it, he’s French to us .. I myself think I could do better and cheaper .. the main thing =)
    1. Meckajiuhe
      Meckajiuhe 22 July 2014 13: 29
      +12
      But it turns out very well, because of this boat to arrange srach in all sorts of Britain-France-iah there.
      1. Vreonosec
        Vreonosec 22 July 2014 13: 34
        +1
        The only plus of its acquisition =))
    2. series
      series 22 July 2014 13: 37
      +3
      A "good ship" is not a fishing boat or two oars, but a whole high-tech complex. So, for this they took them to get technologies, domestic analogues of which were successfully developed in the 90s ...
    3. lelikas
      lelikas 22 July 2014 13: 47
      +12
      Quote: Vreonosec
      A good ship ... but damn it, he’s French to us .. I myself think I could do better and cheaper .. the main thing =)

      And they would have done! , but so in 10-15 years. It would take three years to design, then seven to eight years to build. We have a poor "Gren" still can not master him.
    4. Billy Bones
      Billy Bones 22 July 2014 13: 49
      +7
      This topic has been raised five times already. Of course they can do it, maybe they can do it better, but the question is: can they do it at least as fast ?. Two ships in three years ... We have as many landing craft being built !!!
  3. Yellow white
    Yellow white 22 July 2014 13: 23
    +2
    The main thing now is that L.yah.g.s.a.t.s.p.i and keep their word given the day before, but as a courtesan, I will not give request
    1. nikrandel
      nikrandel 22 July 2014 13: 32
      +1
      If they do not hold back, it will be worse only for them, minus authority at the international level, plus the title of bedding of America.
      Hollande - think carefully, we are neither warm nor cold from the loss of this ship, we will build it ourselves, and you will pay fines and loss of confidence in the business sphere.
  4. Arh
    Arh 22 July 2014 13: 23
    +10
    France will sell the helicopter carriers of the Russian Federation to evil !!!)))
  5. 75 hammer
    75 hammer 22 July 2014 13: 23
    +5
    It’s good to work with capitalists, they are ready for anything for the benefit, and everyone has their own benefit, but the rest of the allies are about the USA!
    USA must be destroyed !!!
  6. Giant thought
    Giant thought 22 July 2014 13: 23
    +2
    Will there be any performance of the contract by the French at all, it was too painfully pressed by mattresses.
    1. Duke
      Duke 22 July 2014 13: 30
      +5
      Quote: Giant thought
      Will there be any performance of the contract by the French at all, it was too painfully pressed by mattresses.

      I think France will withstand the onslaught of the United States.
  7. Vreonosec
    Vreonosec 22 July 2014 13: 24
    0
    Do not give up under the contract, we will take it by force =)
    1. mamont5
      mamont5 22 July 2014 13: 30
      +3
      Quote: Vreonosec
      Do not give up under the contract, we will take it by force =)


      What for? Start a war because of this. If the Franks do not give us the ship, they will lose much more than we. And we, as already mentioned above, will be able to build even better, and not one with this money.
    2. creak
      creak 22 July 2014 14: 08
      +3
      Vreonosec.
      Do not give up under the contract - we will take it by force ...

      First, we will throw hats, and then we will take away, easily, with one left, as in a shooter fellow
      1. The comment was deleted.
  8. Wolka
    Wolka 22 July 2014 13: 29
    +2
    I think the French will nevertheless fulfill their contractual obligations, build and hand over the enti arks of Russia, now this is a matter of honor for them ... Yes
    1. Wiruz
      Wiruz 22 July 2014 14: 02
      +2
      it is now a matter of honor for them

      This matter of honor is not so much for the French as a whole, but personally for Monsieur Hollande. And it’s not a matter of honor, but ... so to speak ... unwillingness to lose confidence on the part of the electorate. Now many predict the victory of Madame Le Pen in the upcoming presidential election, and the disruption of the sale of the Mistrals will only aggravate the situation for the still-president of France.
  9. 22Alex
    22Alex 22 July 2014 13: 30
    0
    let them keep it.
    1. Wiruz
      Wiruz 22 July 2014 13: 55
      +2
      Well, yes, and then Russia 10-15 years later do not have UDC in the fleet. And the penalty is stolen. Well done, well thought up good
  10. VPO
    VPO 22 July 2014 13: 30
    +2
    They have already announced today that they will give the first one, and the second one .. here's the question.
    1. Wiruz
      Wiruz 22 July 2014 13: 57
      +2
      As far as I know, ONE contract for TWO ships has been drawn up. There was no half team contract. And what will they do then with the stern of Sevastopol?
    2. g1v2
      g1v2 22 July 2014 14: 54
      +2
      The second ship will be completed a year, so they want them to be behind them for a year. And after a year, the conflict will either end or become of no interest to anyone, and they will calmly transfer the ship to us. Moreover, all that we needed was already received by us - one ready-made ship, project, documentation, personnel and crew training. Initially, we needed one ship, but the Franks did not want to put their systems on it, and to squeeze them we increased the number of ships under construction to 2. In general, the Franks hope that they will be left behind for a year and they will calmly fulfill the terms of the contract.
  11. vlad-ns
    vlad-ns 22 July 2014 13: 31
    +2
    Now would be Stalin. Poroshenko would surely have become a bucket, and his entire team - a bunch of bucket.
    1. series
      series 22 July 2014 13: 55
      0
      1. Under Stalin, there was no Internet and such a level of technology in zombifying the masses (Even Goebbels, at one time, complained about the absence of anything like that).
      2. Under Stalin there was not so much "democracy" and "freedom of speech"
      3. Under Stalin, the mentality of the people of the country (and in the world) was completely different (society still was not so spoiled by consumerism).

      Those. (theoretically) come back today Stalin (exactly the one we know), he would have behaved in much the same way as Putin. Just as Putin would have thrown to the beginning of the 20th century, with his current politics, there he would have felt freer and more relaxed, i.e. about the same as Stalin (IMHO)
  12. Vik.Tor
    Vik.Tor 22 July 2014 13: 37
    +2
    The French would have received money, and didn’t quarrel with the states, as they say, it’s possible to get on the tree and don’t rip the ass off.
  13. propolsky
    propolsky 22 July 2014 13: 40
    0
    It is high time not to look in the direction of America, but to live your own mind.
  14. series
    series 22 July 2014 13: 40
    +2
    It makes no sense for the French to keep the Mistrals for themselves. technologies (for which all these "dances") have already been transferred to the Russian side. Those. in the event of a breakdown of the contract, francs, not only have the technology been transferred, but also the money will have to be returned (+ fines) ... It must be 100% a fool to do this ...
    1. lelikas
      lelikas 22 July 2014 13: 48
      +3
      Quote: S-17
      It must be 100% stupid to do this ...

      Well, or an American.
      1. series
        series 23 July 2014 10: 00
        0
        I am talking specifically about the French and Europeans in general. It is clear that it’s profitable for Amers to bring together profitable ...
    2. tlauicol
      tlauicol 22 July 2014 13: 58
      +1
      Well, the Franks were already doing this: they did not give the ordered and paid missile boats to the Jews. Well, the Jews are not Russian - they did not bother with Chinese warnings and notes of protest, but simply ... they hijacked boats from Cherbourg to Israel!
      so that's it! weak to us?
      1. series
        series 23 July 2014 10: 02
        0
        Apparently not. What, nevertheless, they promise to deliver the Mistrals (they can smell how it can end). At least one was confirmed, and on the second, they hope so that until the fall of 2015 everything will resolve ...
  15. Thompson
    Thompson 22 July 2014 13: 52
    +1
    Quote: mamont5
    Quote: inkass_98
    Let’s take a look, in the light of recent events, certain doubts arise regarding the timing of the transfer of this ark to Russia.


    The French clearly hope that by November next year all problems will resolve. In short, either the emir will die, or the donkey.

    Well, I don’t feel like losing the loot, taking into account the current state of the economies !!!
  16. Wiruz
    Wiruz 22 July 2014 13: 53
    +4
    And yet, Mistral is a good ship. The Russian Navy needs such. It's a shame of course that he is French, but you have to be reasonable: such ships were not built either in the USSR or in Russia. There were two projects, not bad enough for those times, but things didn’t go beyond drawings and dreams about project implementation. But France has a finished project, and the Mistrals already built by then have shown themselves well, and French shipyards are able to implement such an order in such a short time. Give 4 ala-Mistral as part of the Russian Navy! (we only build the second pair ourselves) hi
    1. dr.star75
      dr.star75 22 July 2014 19: 15
      +1
      WE have already learned how to make "asses" and quickly (we screwed our z-s). With the appropriate documentation, they can do it before. Doubts about the docking.
  17. Ofitser_V
    Ofitser_V 22 July 2014 13: 55
    +3
    Vanga about Russia "Everything will melt like ice, only one thing will remain intact - the glory of Vladimir, the glory of Russia. Too much has been sacrificed. No one can stop Russia. It will sweep everything out of its way and not only remain, but also become the ruler of the world." ... soldier
    Before they wondered what Vladimir was talking about. They remembered Lenin, Prince Vladimir Svyatoslavovich's "Red Sun", even Zhirinovsky. But now it’s clear who Wang meant.

    http://www.kp.ru/daily/26218.3/3101144/
  18. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 22 July 2014 13: 57
    +2
    Well, the Americans are not risking their money. and strangers as much as they want ...
    But the boats are good, come in handy.
  19. Finches
    Finches 22 July 2014 13: 57
    +1
    The devil knows why Russia needs such ships — we don’t have overseas colonies, and hang around like pens ... all over the globe with expeditionary corps, so the doctrine is somewhat different!
    The long-suffering ships of the commander genius Serdyukov!
    But once paid, they should be in the port of registry, regardless of the cries of the world community!
  20. Dezinto
    Dezinto 22 July 2014 13: 58
    -1
    Requires 40 types of grease .....!

    Our captain RTOs said to this that once a year he smears everything with salidol and on the way ...

    And then there are 40 species! ... and where will we buy them, and who will repair it? French people.? Well, what for us a ship that will be serviced in another country?

    Ambiguous this project has turned out. With him more gimor. Well, let it be of course. But we ourselves really could make such a barge.
    1. suomi76
      suomi76 22 July 2014 16: 28
      +1
      The commander of the MRK. And the captain of the MRK can say anything, but I doubt his knowledge of the m507a diesels, which also undoubtedly require oil.
  21. kowalski
    kowalski 22 July 2014 14: 02
    +3
    I believe that the name "Sevastopol" was prepared in advance ...?! Maybe the tradition will slowly take root?
    1. DMB87
      DMB87 22 July 2014 14: 56
      0
      That is:

      Kiev
      Riga
      Kishinev
      Berlin
      Paris
      ...
      And for the final battleship Washington? And build again the French ...
  22. raketnik
    raketnik 22 July 2014 14: 21
    +2
    THE PEOPLE, you at least say anything BUT how it will call out: THE ORDER OF THE RUSSIAN NAVY SHIPS IN THE HEAD WITH THE SEVASTOPOL HELICOPTER WENT INTO THE PORT OF SEVASTOPOL --- and what gnashing teeth will be heard from all sides
  23. Nayhas
    Nayhas 22 July 2014 14: 40
    +3
    I like their pace of construction, no words ... once and again, a ship with a displacement of 30 thousand tons ...
  24. PalSanych
    PalSanych 22 July 2014 15: 15
    +1
    Well, or an American.
    For money, a series of sanctions look through the fingers. like rocket engines
  25. His
    His 22 July 2014 15: 21
    0
    Lizzy hidden underdevelopment is not slipped. To not fall apart in swimming.
    1. Dezinto
      Dezinto 22 July 2014 15: 38
      0
      In our fleet, he should go and not swim ...

      But about the incomplete hidden, yes, there is such a question .... they can slip ...
  26. veteran56
    veteran56 22 July 2014 15: 40
    0
    It would be better if we were paid a forfeit for breach of contract, and the French would keep this monster for themselves. we are a monster.
  27. Dezinto
    Dezinto 22 July 2014 15: 43
    0
    ........................
    1. Wiruz
      Wiruz 22 July 2014 23: 07
      0
      I will disappoint you, but this is not Mistral. It is more like the Spanish Juan Carlos. Most likely this is it.
  28. Dezinto
    Dezinto 22 July 2014 15: 45
    +1
    Scary, of course ... but it will not be superfluous.
    1. kowalski
      kowalski 22 July 2014 16: 18
      +1
      I agree. Not everything is calm in the world and our affairs are IN !!! "Until October, I'm afraid we won't manage ..." (Nachoperot. "Green van") ...
  29. azbukin77
    azbukin77 22 July 2014 19: 56
    -1
    Quote: Mountain Shooter
    Well, the Americans are not risking their money. and strangers as much as they want ...
    But the boats are good, come in handy.

    Until the first torpedo.
    1. Wiruz
      Wiruz 22 July 2014 23: 09
      0
      Following your logic, EVERY ship should have an air defense system, missile defense, cruise missiles and protection from torpedoes ???
  30. Skvor
    Skvor 23 July 2014 04: 17
    0
    Sorry dear. It seems to me that this ship is needed by our aircraft. Black Sea Fleet for example. The presence of the Helicopter Attack in support of landing in the Mediterranean basin for example.