About falsifiers of Russian history
It sometimes amazes how people can look at one fact in a different way, at one phenomenon. In Russian stories You can find a lot of iconic figures, broken around and break spears in disputes. So, Stalin, for all his shortcomings (and which person doesn’t have them?), Is recognized even by his enemies, Churchill and Hitler, the greatest statesman in the history of not only 20 centuries, but the whole history of mankind. And some people believe that he is an insignificant person, "scum" is actually accidentally in power.
Back in the 19 century, they noted that the Russian liberal, from the liberal of their beloved France, or England, is distinguished, above all, by the hatred of their Fatherland. European liberals, despite their views, love and respect their homeland. The liberal of Russia hates him and wants to "rebuild" to the ground, that is, to destroy.
Alexander Yaroslavich for the Russian people is a hero, a magnificent commander who could defend the north-western borders for Russia, who broke the most powerful and cruel enemy, who became holy. But according to Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences Yuri Pivovarov, the author of more than 200 works on Russian history, political science and law, “Alexander Nevsky is one of the controversial, if not stinking figures in Russian history ...”. He was the "mercenary warrior" of the Horde, the Battle of the Neva and the Battle of the Ice - "small border conflicts." In addition, “Nevsky behaved like a gangster, attacking with a large number of a handful of border guards. He did the same ignoble in the Battle of the Neva, ... ”
About the fact that the German "handful of border guards" committed massacres in Pskov, Brewers did not recall, as well as the fact that the Swedish "handful of border guards" received the blessing of the Vatican for the Crusade.
For us, Mikhail Kutuzov is the embodiment of the deep Russian spirit, a disciple of the great A. Suvorov, inspiring a soldier who had fought along with his soldiers by personal example. So, 23 July 1774, the battle of Alushta 29-year-old M. Kutuzov Grenadier battalion commander first broke into the fortified village of Noises, while pursuing a fleeing enemy was seriously wounded by a bullet in the temple. In 1788, during the siege of Ochakov, already being a general, Kutuzov was twice seriously wounded. In 1790, during the famous assault of Ismail Kutuzov, commanding the shock column, he captured the enemy bastion and first broke into the city itself. Field Marshal Mikhail Kutuzov was a full gentleman of the Order of St. George, there were only four such people in the history of the Russian Empire. Kutuzov worked hard all his life, fought, proved himself an excellent strategist in World War 1812, the highest understanding of the interests of the Russian people, when he spoke out against the liberation of hostile Russia of Europe from Napoleon. He was a wonderful husband and father of six children. He was loved by officers and soldiers. Just a role model for any Russian person, officer.
For Yu. Pivovarov: “Kutuzov was a bummer, an intriguer, an erotic man who adored fashionable French actresses and read French pornographic novels.” Minin, in the opinion of this “historian,” sold part of the population of Nizhny Novgorod into slavery in order to help with the money raised to create a militia for the liberation of Moscow from the Poles. Stalin is “scum” for him, the USSR is an “evil empire,” and the entire Soviet period of history is “Russia's greatest tragedy in the 1000 years of its existence.”
His views on the current period in the history of Russia are also interesting, according to the academician, Russia needs to abandon Siberia and the Far East, and for optimal entry into Europe, Russia's population should be 80-90 million people. And this person lives quietly, expresses his opinion on television channels, in print media, spits on the Russian saints, this is the wrong side of "freedom of speech".
It is clear that he is not an “outcast” historian who writes and speaks only his thoughts that have little in common with historical truth. He and the whole cohort of brewers, mlechins, Svanidze, poznerov, Radzinsky are engaged in a holistic work on the falsification of our past, as part of the holistic concept of the information war of the West against Russia. In fact, these are “internal enemies” who are engaged in the destruction of our foundations, on which our statehood, Russian self-consciousness stands. Russia is striving to disintegrate, to establish a regime of external control. For this, the US State Department through the system of so-called non-governmental organizations sponsors various Russian universities, academic institutions, individual departments, various “independent” scholars and experts. Mostly foreign financial support is enjoyed by Russian humanitarian and economic universities, departments, and institutes. In the West, they are well aware that it is from Russian education and science that the stability of the entire Russian state largely depends.
There is a selection of the most distinguished students, graduate students, they are sent for training and internship abroad. Then, young masters and doctors with “brainwashed” and embedded values of the West, with the help of lobbying systems, are actually being introduced to key positions in Russian education, business and politics, becoming “agents of influence” in Russia. It looks Russian, speaking our language, but the enemies of their homeland, history, Russian civilization.
These people are allowed to the learning process of our children, create educational standards, write textbooks, represent the Russian Federation at the international level.
Sources of:
http://www.tvkultura.ru/page.html?cid=8084
http://www.sorokinfond.ru/index.php?id=528
http://mywebs.su/blog/polemics/5124.html
Information