Is there currently a threat of the collapse of the Russian Federation?

After the collapse of the Soviet Union, 15 of new independent states was created, but after 20 years it is quite obvious that almost all of them did not pass the test of time, being completely artificial formations. Created only to weaken Great Russia - the core of the Russian civilization. Economically, the Baltic countries are bankrupt, people from there massively flee to other European countries. Politically, their only sense of existence is the various dirty tricks of the Russian Federation.

The countries of the South Caucasus also show their inconsistency, their citizens live and work in the Russian Federation to feed their relatives left at home. Georgia in general has already managed to fall apart, having lost South Ossetia and Abkhazia, on the turn Ajaria, which it attracts to Turkey. Azerbaijan has lost Nagorno-Karabakh, and there is no chance to return it, only by war and the universal deportation of Armenians from there, which is currently impossible to do. The world is not yet so destabilized. The fate of Baku is to become a “satellite” of Turkey, with a gradual loss of identity. Only Armenia in the South Caucasus has retained a certain understanding that only in union with Russia can it save itself. Apparently, the reason is that Armenians were so often slaughtered that they understood at the genetic level that they could not survive alone.

Central Asia, with a decrease in the percentage of the number of Russians, is slipping into medieval obscurantism and degrading more and more. Already in the medium term, it will face interethnic conflicts of great bloodshed and cruelty - for water, for pastures, for agricultural land, for mines, and so on. The same example of the Osh massacre is just a harbinger of future, even larger clashes. Moreover, this will not necessarily happen in 5-10 years, it can begin at any moment. All these countries, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, have a lot of socio-economic, national problems. Their fate is a further slide into the world of feudalism, with khans, beys, beys, slave trade, drug sales (the example of neighboring Afghanistan and the profits of local drug businessmen is more and more tempting); further deterioration of the infrastructure inherited from the Soviet Union, the degradation of education and medicine, and intellectual potential. Against the background of the introduction of Western disintegrating stereotypes of behavior, the radical currents of Islam will become even stronger, and the threat of an Islamic revolution will grow. As a result, the whole of Central Asia will fall into inferno, becoming like Afghanistan. This will not harm the interests of Western corporations and China; they can defend their economic investments with the help of military private companies. Against their modern communications, intelligence, drones, the mobile capabilities of neo-basmachi mercenaries will not be able to do anything.

With Moldova, everything is also clear - will be absorbed by Romania at the earliest opportunity, with further de-Russification of the population. Belarus turned out to be the most resistant to degradation, but it is not self-sufficient, therefore its outcome will be sad - Lukashenko will be eliminated sooner or later, the new pro-Western regime will arrange “privatization”, the Soviet industrial and agricultural enterprises will be ruined, the army will be “optimized”, the population will be die out even faster.

Small Russia is just a bunch of problems ready to blow up a country at any moment. It can be blown up with the help of the Crimea. Remember Syria, unlike a more stable regime than the Ukrainian one. And he was rocked up to the storming of cities with the help of artillery and armored vehicles. Turn Ukraine into ruins will be much easier. You can start in the Crimea, on the border with Romania, Hungary, Poland. You can play the card of Galicia, the radical sentiments of Western Ukrainians (many of them believe that the south-east of Ukraine is stopping them on their way to United Europe). Plus, the degradation of the army, the country's infrastructure, the mass of socio-economic problems.

It turns out that all the republics of the former USSR are artificial formations created after the defeat of the Red Empire in the Third World War, or, in a different way, in the “cold war”. And in Moscow it is already time to adopt a law “on a divided united Russian people” (Great Russians, Little Russians, Belarusians), “on a divided big Russia”. A new union of our peoples is needed, otherwise it is impossible, all nations alone are doomed to be victims of the globalization of the West or, as an option, of China or the Islamic world.

So, according to the latest Rosstat data, a bunch of anti-social, anti-people states were formed on the place of the USSR: “Almost three-quarters of the population of Russia are poor or most needy citizens. The situation is even worse in Kazakhstan, Ukraine and Azerbaijan, and a little better in Belarus. ”

And one more fact: during the conference “20 years after the USSR: what’s next?”, Deputy Chairman of the State Duma Security Committee Gennady Gudkov said that there was a threefold increase in the export of capital from the Russian Federation. That is, the modern "elite" cares only about their personal interests, it does not connect their future with the future of Russia and its peoples.

In such a situation, a social revolution is only a matter of time ...

The only thing that can save the peoples of the Russian Federation, the former Soviet Union from non-existence is a new global project, globalization in Russian, a new union. Taking into account the mistakes of the past, for example: no distortions in the development of the regions, so that the Baltic States or the regions of Central Asia are equipped at the expense of the central regions. And for this, Russia needs a new elite, ready to fight for its people, to defend only its interests.

Sources of:
http://svpressa.ru/economy/article/44482/
http://www.ng.ru/economics/2011-06-02/4_antisocial.html

Comments

[Rico1977]

Where can I get it, this new elite? At the top, it’s definitely not there, but at the bottom it’s good to talk about the fate of Russia in the kitchens, but when they go up, they’ll start to take out the capital ...

[Berislav]

The article is valid according to all the canons of social magic.

It seems like they say positive, but the fact of the collapse of Russia into spare parts lies in the head. And the author kind of writes how to resist this.

As a result, after reading the article, everyone is SURE that the collapse of Russia is an EXISTING fact, and not an illusion that the author of the article painted on. Those who understand a little will eat and will here pour arguments in the comments on how to protect Russia. Thus, spinning the flywheel of the information spell, the ultimate goal of which is the collapse of Russia.

))) Everything that is not done is not just. Randomness is the concept of a person who does not have the knowledge to perceive the causal relationship of subjective and objective processes.

[frame5]

By the way, really recently, and especially on this site, the theme of the collapse of Russia has been constantly discussed.

[Berislav]

frame5, the illusion of Stalin’s coolness is launched on this site (I personally don’t treat him like a killer, but I also consider it senseless to regard a savior), the coolness of his path, the coolness of the USSR under Stalin’s control, the figurativeness of the current leadership that wants (sleeps and sees) ruin Russia.

This site is a special project for "patriots". Unleashing Nazis and patriots for action.

Nothing new.

[frame5]

The "Patriots" came running here afterwards.
Forty-year-old reactionary hamsters are the main audience.

[Superduck]

I finally cook from these pretentious hatches to the public like "globalization in Russian, a new union." etc. Everyone rushes with these words to the right and to the left, these words were uttered when they shouted that Chechnya should be returned to its place, these words are pronounced when they say that it needs to be fenced off with a thorn and given independence, when Ukraine needs to close the valve and then when Ukrainians are our brothers and we are one people ...
Do you know what gentlemen hollow-headed patriot you have achieved?
THESE WORDS ALREADY DO NOT MEAN ANYTHING EVEN FOR YOU!
No one bothered to say what he means by this globalization, this third Rome and other crap. No one tried to think in what form it all seemed, did not try to show respect for their future allies, only cliched fuckers (Ukrainians, Bulbashs, chocks, etc.). Only arrogance attributed to himself the glory for the exploits of others, such as WE combined, WE freed, We gave. Who are "we? Me and GDP?
Here is this abortion article in the same topic. Everyone is inferior, everyone wants the evil of Russia, they only know how to dig gas and oil, but we will capture and enslave them and on this we will build a society of universal prosperity and equality. Doesn't it remind anyone? Let me tell you - look in Germany at the end of the 30s of the last century. Really the people in Russia do this?

[atheist]

there will be no collapse of Russia — the Caucasus — well, even if they unite in the Islamic world (as they previously wanted), then the struggle for power will begin, and their oil from Chechnya and Dagestan is not so important,
Siberia, too, people will not fall off a little, a lot of money,
and so on, there will be no collapse, it will only be the capture of our east by China, but it’s only in 5-7 years, and then maybe we will sell it so that there is no war, but from the west, their population dies

[Sergey M.]

Well, what kind of anti-Russians showed up here.

The Russians gathered land. And with a sword and at the request - for example - Georgia.

And who when acted otherwise?
Examples, please!

Only the Russians, having annexed other peoples in one way or another, rendered them all kinds of support, and their princes were recognized in the courtyard, on an equal basis with everyone - this is the 18-19th century.

As the USSR collapsed, all local elites reached out to restore their former khanates.

It turned out that over the 70 years of the USSR - the teip structure of many republics - has not been erased, clans are everywhere - Brezhnev's speech - "We have formed a UNIFIED MULTINATIONAL SOCIETY - SOVIET PEOPLE" - this is dust and lies.

The USSR has never owned a part of the CPSU — the entire space.

And loyalty has ALWAYS BEEN PURCHASED by donations and non-interference.

I personally, under the current government, cannot imagine preserving the Russian Federation in its previous form.

The power buys everyone and looks at everything through her fingers - she herself is head over heels in the toilet.
All bureaucrats bought a ticket and money and real estate over the hill.
Waiting for hours H.

I do not believe in the upcoming elections.
Although I’ll go.

And for whom, for the prostitute girik?
No, it’s better for Zyuga .. Although, since 1991, he has not voted for the Communists.

Other parties DO NOT REGISTER, including patriotic ones.

[mitrich]

There is always a threat of collapse of the Russian Federation. That's just: DO NOT WAIT!

[datur]

mitrich, well done.

[His]

Normal article. I fully support. Only one thing: in these parts there is no longer a Russian population, and modern Russia is gradually becoming a self-sufficient country, and now it is difficult for people to explain why we need annexation, for example, of Modavia, Georgia, or Tajikistan with Kyrgyzstan ...

[Eric]

hmm ...

[Bob]

Putin called the collapse of the USSR a tragedy. Medvedev this year presented the award to Gorbachev for "services" to his homeland. So they are in the same boat ?! And what will happen in the next 2012 election year ?!
Undoubtedly, with the collapse of the country, major problems began in the economy, social sphere, and now security is under threat. Moreover, all the Soviet republics have problems. Russia inherited from the USSR received the status of an outcast country. NATO bases are located in the former fraternal republics, exercises are conducted directly at our borders (in the Black Sea in June, in the Baltic States exercises with NATO forces also in June). In accordance with the strategy of the Global Strike, Russia at any moment may be threatened by a group of forces, which is operatively deployed in the strategic direction. What is it like the beginning of the end ?! How to resist this? And why is there a question at all - to unite in a new Union or to put your head in the sand like an ostrich and wait for pleasant sensations in one place. Only together, only under the cover of our S-400 and Iskander, as well as the Voevod and strategic TUShek, keeping their submarines and missile carriers at a decent distance (and not as the cruiser Monterey is now allowed into the Black Sea) with the help of submarines and aircraft, can to solve the main task for all - to survive (SURVIVE) in these new conditions (CRISIS OF CIVILIZATION), when states in the Middle East collapse one after another, when a new big war for resources flares up. What questions can there be? Or should you first experience "pleasant" sensations, and then, having understood the obvious, sober up and make the right decision towards each other? It is urgently required to restore the destroyed military and economic system for the benefit of the peoples inhabiting the country. Are you not tired of dividing everyone according to ethnicity - are you a Belarusian or a Ukrainian, a Mari or a Tatar? What should we share? But the elite, of course, is different, the "big" bosses have become ... The problem is in them (the elite is the word), and not in us. However, the general threat of course will dot all the points, and it will be necessary to restore the lost at a frantic pace. Will there be time for this?

[Ragnarek]

any country has a threat of collapse belgium or ukrainian for example so what? What is the meaning of the article? There are no special prerequisites for the collapse of the same Caucasus (at least in words) with all limbs for being part of Russia. (because they understand that alone will be a series of wars)

[Stefano]

This is exactly

[imjrek]

just as the union was collapsed ARTificially, so Russia can be collapsed ARTIFICially. just HELLO look at the politics of the ruling Russian elite, how else can this policy be called as not preparing for the collapse, just compare what Gorbachev was doing and the current solid parallels are doing.

[MichaelVl]

And what are they doing so that Russia is already falling apart?

[imjrek]

An example of how to prepare the collapse:
How citizens are quietly prepared for the collapse of Russia in 2 parts
http://ervix.livejournal.com/536426.html#cutid1

[DAGESTAN333]

Already openly bullied, scum ...

It will be so if we ourselves allow it.

[imjrek]

Michael, well, if you yourself are not able to elementary comparisons, then please. perestroika - modernization, corporations - privatization (not so long ago as the Medvedev demanded to accelerate this action), and so what area should not be taken, the continuation of the Gorbachev’s business is everywhere, and people like you, ADABRYAMSA accelerate these processes.

[78nek]

Everyone, save Sasha Samsonov !!! Urgently!!! Man finally falls into MARASM. It's not funny. Read the latest articles. There is a clear need for outpatient treatment. The author no longer distinguishes between reality and living, being and fiction. Anything else good will fly out into the street with a saber in his hands and let's "unite, defend the national interests", etc. Innocent people can get hurt.

[Joker]

Go to the fields yourself and wash down, shout what we (in the sense of you) are all -deleted- since you think so.

The article is pretty good.

[Superduck]

Where is it not bad? Where is the logical connection between the fact that "all except the Russian Federation are filthy lumps and losers" (4/5 written) and the fact that the Russian Federation is threatened with collapse? What did he call the composition? "Is there currently a threat of the collapse of the Russian Federation?" and where at least a paragraph that deals with this problem?
Further, since he already touched on this topic. How does globalization in Russian give advantages against the current state of things? No, not all of us, to varying degrees, guess what the advantages and disadvantages are, but when the author wrote this opus he wanted to bring us to something? He led me only to the fact that there is no life behind the cordons of the Russian Federation, then I expect to hear his opinion on how to fix everything, and here it is, everyone on the collective farm! Well, let's say, what next?
Therefore, I propose to the author to rename the essay in "Chocks against D'Artagnan or another reason to drink vodka." Read every time after the performance of the Russian national football team with any other European one to realize that somewhere is even worse.

[Joker]

As far as I understand the article, there are two development paths:

- further degradation, and when stomping on the spot it is only a matter of time.

- or the reconstruction of a great empire, under which the idea of ​​the Soviet, federal or, for example, the tsarist is not talking.

In short, any individual, community, country, etc. There are two ways, either development or stagnation, since stomping on the spot always leads to degeneration.

[Superduck]

"- either the re-creation of a great empire, under which idea of ​​the Soviet, federal or, for example, the tsarist one does not go."
With all due respect, but this is utter stupidity, this should be discussed precisely in the first place, or do you think that the main thing is an empire and everything else will follow. Remember one of the newest empires, actually the 3rd Reich. Ideology decided a lot, including its death, Hitler could not sell an attractive ideology to the world, and Uncle Sam could, do you feel the difference in the end? For example, I can’t sell any empire that hit me, and there are many like me. I will not buy the empire of Vova Putin or a racist from Australia. You damn sorry that we were born like that, but I think that mass executions will solve the problem in your empire and, as a result, the good will triumph.

[Joker]

Uncle Sam sat overseas in an Obi war and bought (well, or bent) weakened European economies under loans.

Quote: SuperDuck

You really damn sorry we were born like that, but I think that mass executions will solve the problem in your empire and the good will triumph.

- I did not quite understand what it was about, but each person has the right to a human relation to himself, provided that he does not behave like scum. Understand exactly how it is written.

[Superduck]

No, empires are not built like that. Empire suppresses dissent by definition. This I mean that the idea should be as attractive as possible for the target audience with maximum coverage, or the second option is when the empire is built on ideas of a radical kind, like, for example, the same 3rd Reich, but then massive repressions cannot be avoided by definition. That's why I say that the idea needs to be sold. For example, let's take the hypothetical idea of ​​great Russia. Well, we take the ideology of Russianness (Nazi / nationalist, that is), we have Jews in the minuses (well, very few people care about it now), "zapadentsy" and not only in Ukraine, Tatars, the notorious North Caucasus Federal District, Kazakhs? On their Solovki? The same garbage with Orthodoxy, Stalin. Consider a civil war guaranteed.
Well, you can try to pedal the idea of ​​the Anglo-Saxon confrontation against the Slavs. But this dooms the empire to live in economic isolation that death is similar until at least China becomes a force equal to the United States (but for now this is an illusion).
Well, what do we have left. The revanchist idea of ​​the goodness of the USSR, it cannot be sold to the majority of the population. Even many "young" pensioners do not believe in it, young people will laugh at it at all.
First come up with an idea that will unite people, I don’t know, maybe I just forgot something from fashion trends.

[Joker]

The article simply talked about what is needed, but the topic we raised is interesting.

Quote: SuperDuck

Here, for example, take the hypothetical idea of ​​a great Russia. Well, we take the ideology of Russianness (Nazi / nationalist that is)

- It’s not necessary that the idea of ​​Great Russia should be brightly nationalist, the rule of law is sufficient all.

Quote: SuperDuck

The Revanchist Idea of ​​the Goodness of the USSR

- I do not agree to call it that, in one way or another, the socialist system has given a lot not only to the Russian people and members of the union, but also to many others.
Example, after the revolution in Russia in Europe, a 5-day work week, an 8-hour work day, etc. were introduced.

In any case, at the moment, any thoughts about a strong Russia look somewhat utopian, but that is if in the near future.

[Superduck]

Quote: Joker

Not necessarily the idea of ​​Great Russia should be brightly nationalist

Not the idea of ​​Great Russia is nationalistic, but the idea of ​​Russianness (if taken for its ideological content) is, by definition, nationalistic.

Quote: Joker

I do not agree to call it that, in one way or another, the socialist system has given a lot not only to the Russian people and members of the union, but also to many others.

Well, you see, how to call it the second question there, then what you want as it sounded may not completely correlate with the terms and definitions of political science, I'm not talking about flags but about essence. I just make a reservation once again that the idea of ​​socialism is really close to the souls of many residents b. The Soviet Union also seems ugly and discredited to others. Again, looking at what to talk about, if we talk about socialism according to Marx or the model of socialism built in the USSR, these are 2 big differences.

Quote: Joker

Enough legality for everyone.

Sounds good, but just too vague.
The only thing that seems to me now can massively unite people is the destruction of the existing government, but even that with serious opposition. In United Russia, someone is the same, Seliger goes to the camp, and attends meetings of Our and Young Guards. But the concept of destroying power and then see also nothing but a long civil war will lead.

[Joker]

Quote: SuperDuck

Not the idea of ​​Great Russia is nationalistic, but the idea of ​​Russianness (if taken for its ideological content) is, by definition, nationalistic.

Well, you don’t need it, so you need the idea of ​​Great Russia (Russia) regarding nationalism, I repeat once again, total compliance with the rule of law is necessary, but at the moment this is utopia.

Quote: SuperDuck

I just make a reservation once again that the idea of ​​socialism is really close to the souls of many residents b. The Soviet Union also seems ugly and discredited to others.

I do not say that this is a panacea, but as an option it should not be discarded.

I repeat, in any case, in these conditions this is utopia, and the second revolution is not needed, in view of the high probability of the coming to power of even greater abomination.

[viktor_ui]

Very not bad - a hammer

[imjrek]

in general, it is necessary to talk about the probability of an event, and the trend of processes.
therefore, exaggerating the semblance of the eighths is not worth it, since the topic is serious and concerns the fate of the country and people.
over the past 100 years, this has happened TWICE, history does not teach anything only to the last MISTAKES, since they are not a priori capable of learning.

[imjrek]

I think that it’s not just necessary to defend and not only protect the weak, it’s self-evident and this is according to the Gospel: there is no longer that love how to give your soul for your own.
but you need to set a goal - RESTORATION OF THE ORTHODOX RUSSIAN EMPIRE (to make this slogan a Russian idea). and unite under this slogan, so we connect the earthly with the heavenly (Russia is the holy foot of the throne of God — John of Kronstadt), not only personal salvation, but also the salvation of all Orthodox (and not Orthodox) people of the world.
in the Russian Empire, Russians were called Russians - Little Russians (Ukrainians), Belaros (Belarus), Great Russians (Russians of Greater Russia), as well as Cossacks. In Soviet times, the Russians were SUSILED to one group - the Great Russians and began to identify Russians only with them, but this is fundamentally wrong, the concept of Russians is much broader - malorosy, Belarosy, great-born, Cossacks, this is Russian. And it unites us along ethnicity, culture, mentality, and the fact that we are the IMPERIAL PEOPLE, the people who build the EMPIRE !!!

[KHAN]

I know and believe one thing: in 20 years, Russia will completely fall and new states will be created: in Siberia, the Far East (the Far East can become Chinese) and in the Caucasus. Now Russia is covered by gangs and the mafia and no one wants to invest capital, investment. But to feed Russian soldiers, to arm will be nothing! and pood leads the country here!

[Victor]

KHAN,
Who are you? Chinese? Fuck you, not the Far East and the Caucasus! We got to Berlin, not far to Beijing!

[DAGESTAN333]

KHAN is not physically able to comprehend that here for the sake of a soldier, if necessary, they will give the last shirt.

In this case, KHAN runs the risk of dying of old age, on the banks of the river, where he was going to wait for the corpse of his enemy.

[Victor]

KHAN,
Yes, and here's another thing, more often the Chinese need to remember Damansky, when some rubber sneakers were left from a couple of divisions.

[KHAN]

the case of Daman passed a long time ago, about 60 years ago. Then the Soviets had money for arming. Seichas Russia does not have then Kazakhstan as a free warehouse. And after Damansky, a peace agreement was not signed between Russia and China and there are no guarantees that China will not attack Russia. And the Far East, even soon in 10-15 years, will become Chinese since there are already many Chinese who live there and Russia has a powerful Chinese Army armed with the latest technology, and Chinese soldiers with good ovuchenie than the Russian. One old Russian tanks against 20 Chinese new tanks! against 1 Russian aircraft 20-30 Chinese! 1 Russian soldier 1000 Chinese! Against Russian Nuclear Missiles against an even more modern Chinese Missile like Dongfen! 2009, the Chinese army repeated the offensive maneuver! against whom? Against Kazakhstan? Against Kazakhstan, such maneuvers are definitely not needed! it was against Russia! then the Chinese are preparing the Russians to sleep!

[DAGESTAN333]

KHAN or pretended KHANoh someone - you’re tired ... take activated charcoal to block hallucinogens, and go to bed, I seriously KHAN

[Ienth]

After the collapse of the Soviet Union, 15 new independent states were created, but after 20 years it is quite obvious that almost all of them have not passed the test of time, being absolutely artificial formations. Created only to weaken Great Russia - the core of Russian civilization. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>))))))))
))))))))))))))))))))))) I die of laughter! says that all of them had lived for the sake of Russians before that !! look to Kazakhstan! only the last 10 years they built Astana and made the reform the first of all the CIS countries! army, economy and production! but the Russians still live with Soviet spirits that left a long time ago in the trash! while the Russians are sleeping, dreaming and reminding that when they ruled the CIS countries, they don’t understand that time is not like during the USSR! sleep Russians! buy french ships! before that you had the construction of corvettes, but where is all this if you are powerful? buy German tanks, Italian armored vehicles! Before, Russia could provide by itself! and now no! every year goes back! behind! sleep, and there the Chinese are preparing you a freebie!