Military Review

"Binding of the ruble to the dollar - the neo-colonial method of financial policy"

43
"Binding of the ruble to the dollar - the neo-colonial method of financial policy"



Kudrin left, but his case lives, the expert states

A draft federal law “On Amendments to the Federal Law“ On the Federal Budget for 2014 Year and for the Planning Period of 2015 and 2016 ”was promulgated. The essence of the document is that the government does not intend to abandon the “budget rule”.

We appealed to State Duma deputy Vyacheslav Tetyokin with a request to comment on the budget and financial policy of our country.

Power simply uses the euphoria associated with the annexation of the Crimea

- Kudrin resigned as finance minister, but his business lives on! The same policy continues, and moreover, the Gaidarism remains. Today it is fashionable to say that in 90, wood was broken, and this is audible at the highest level. But the same team actually continues to remain in the economic block of the government.

By itself, pegging the ruble to the dollar is the neo-colonial method of financial policy. In addition, the refinancing rate of our Central Bank is so much higher than in Western Europe that it is impossible to get a loan at low interest rates. This ruins the manufacturing industry and Russian entrepreneurs are credited abroad.

As for the budget, that is obvious the line of power to cut social spending. Expenditures on health care, science, education and housing and utilities are consistently reduced. This means that the lack of budget funds to support utilities will be “compensated” by rising prices, that is, at the expense of the average person. There is a paradox: the economy is stagnating, but United Russia remains popular.

Power simply uses the euphoria associated with the annexation of the Crimea, in order to tighten the nuts for the population. And they say that the return of the Crimea will require additional costs, and in fact, spending is low, and this is just an excuse.

By the way, I think that at the construction of a bridge across the Kerch Strait, "skilled" hands will even really profit!

We must create competition for the West in high-tech goods markets.

Meanwhile, there are plenty of ways to fill the budget.

The first is the progressive taxation of the super rich. I emphasize: it is not the middle class that should be taxed on a progressive income scale, but those who are in the 1% of the wealthiest population.

The second. In many oil-producing countries, natural rent is owned by the state, which also redistributes it throughout society.

The third is a reduction in corruption. I am sure that many investment projects are being embarked on to steal, and not to build something for society. I will not name specific projects, but I see that the construction there is clearly not necessary for the country.

The fourth source, known from time immemorial for the authorities, is the monopoly on the sale of tobacco and alcohol. And if they consider that monopoly is too radical a method, then they would open in parallel with private shops, the state trade in alcohol and tobacco.

By the way, the ruble invested in agriculture, brings ten rubles, given the entire chain of related industries. So this is not a “black hole”, but also a potentially profitable area, but this is a topic for another conversation.

But the development of the manufacturing industry is the fifth way to fill the budget, including by exporting, for example, airplanes. That is, we must create competition for the West in high-tech goods markets.
Author:
Originator:
http://www.km.ru/economics/2014/05/20/ministerstvo-finansov-rf/740439-vtetekin-privyazka-rublya-k-dollaru-neokolonial
43 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. roman72-452
    roman72-452 22 May 2014 18: 50
    +6
    It’s necessary to leave the peg to the dollar, but it’s better to leave gradually so that we ourselves lose as little as possible on it, although we would already talk about it well.
    1. Sakmagon
      Sakmagon 22 May 2014 20: 12
      +9
      The authorities simply use the euphoria associated with the annexation of Crimea in order to tighten the screws for the population

      Somehow I read to entoy phrases, and realized that I did not understand anything.
      I decided to get into the "primary source". Nuuuu ... you could have guessed ...
      Vyacheslav Nikolayevich Tetyokin (born 2 on October 1949, Chita) is a Russian political figure, deputy of the State Duma of the Russian Federation of the sixth convocation from the Communist Party.
      Okay, probably a financier? Yeah ....
      - Translation Department of Minsk State Ped. Institute of Foreign Languages ​​- employee of the Office of External Relations of the State Committee of the USSR - employee of the Organizing Committee "Olympiad-80" - employee of the Soviet Committee of Solidarity of Asian and African countries - consultant of the apparatus of the deputy group "Democracy" - executive secretary of the State Duma Commission on compiling information on NATO crimes against Yugoslavia belay - Member of the editorial board, deputy chief editor of the newspaper "Soviet Russia" ...
      Okay! Maybe he studied in his spare time from service? Or in the Duma? ...
      On 21 on March 2012, at the Institute of Africa of the Russian Academy of Sciences, he defended his doctoral dissertation on the subject “Mass Democratic Organizations of South Africa in the Struggle Against the Apartheid Regime (1976 — 1991)So there!
      Legislative activity of a deputy: participated - either in the development, or in the discussion - you’ll understand the hell -
      1. Law of the Russian Federation on the amendment to the Constitution of the Russian Federation "On the Federation Council of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation"
      2.On amendments to the Federal Law "On the Calculation of Time" laughing
      3.On amending the Federal Law "On Labor Pensions in the Russian Federation"
      4. On measures of influence on persons involved in violations of fundamental human rights and freedoms, rights and freedoms of citizens of the Russian Federation.
      Place in the overall rating of Deputies (from 450) - 394.
      ... Meanwhile, there are plenty of ways to fill the budget! ...

      I’ll skip ... something is not very comrade for me authoritative in the subject of finance ...
      1. aksakal
        aksakal 22 May 2014 20: 22
        +13
        Quote: Sacmagon
        I’ll skip ... something is not very comrade for me authoritative in the subject of finance ..
        “Well, you don’t have to be a dokoy in finances in order to understand the essence of this new colonial policy.” Well, just an educated person can see the big picture, while the specialist in finances can already see the details. Look into the story ... There is no conspiracy theory, there are facts. In 1694, the Bank of England was established in Great Britain - this is a fact. Its owners were private individuals / bankers, including the KING - this is also a fact. In 1913, a similar structure was organized in the USA ... The Federal Monetary System has private owners ... i.e. main ... the main currency of the world is issued by unknown individuals - this is a fact. There is no conspiracy or conspiracy theory. Further, a natural logical continuation of the uncontrolled printing of money is an attempt to establish its power ANYWHERE wherever possible. Simple logic of events ... If you had the opportunity to have a machine for printing money at home, what did you start to do? Buy everyone! What is being done ... Politicians are being bought, a powerful army is being created, the media is being bought and ALL attempts to create alternative financial centers, which can call into question your power, your right to print money from the air, are being destroyed. Is it not so? And the situation will be tense, strained until a monopoly happens. This is what it is all about. And so gradually, step by step, the WORLD government is created ... this is a consequence, and there are attempts to take control of political, economic, etc. aspects of the global process. This is a logical continuation of the fact that once bankers got the opportunity to make money from the air. By the way, what have Russia and China agreed on? Under all new contracts, will the countries be settled solely in rubles and yuan? There will be no petrodollar! It is a fact! US bankers (not the public) are deeply unpleasant ... What can they do? They cannot break the contract ... BUT, they can try to destabilize the situation. By the way, a powerful terrorist attack has already occurred in Urumchi, the Amer special services are working very quickly, it seems that Russia and the Chinese have come close to Kashchei’s egg. Weaken the state not at the economic level, but at the political level. Further, logical circuits can be expanded in different directions. I won’t write anymore. Too long and too much.
        1. samuil60
          samuil60 22 May 2014 22: 15
          +2
          Conspiracy theory you say? How is it not, if you yourself are talking about the World Government? How could it have come into being, if not as a result of a worldwide conspiracy? When ALL Western countries, together with the United States, pounced on Russia, did they fear Black Obama, or what? The conspiracy theory was first voiced by Ahad Haam at the World Zionist Conference in Basel in 1898, if I am not mistaken, the year. These are the world famous "protocols of the Elders of Zion". Some of these protocols were announced 60 years later by the CIA director regarding the USSR. As you can see, everything came true. When the late Metropolitan of St. Petersburg John was asked by a journalist of the Jewish Newspaper: "Do you think that the" protocols "are just an invention of anti-Semites," the Metropolitan replied: "I would also think so, but the events of world history, especially of recent times, confirm their authenticity with inexorable certainty. " Regarding the terrorist attack in China - the truth is. This American warning to China is serious and, alas, not the last.
          1. aksakal
            aksakal 22 May 2014 23: 38
            0
            Quote: samuil60
            How is it not, if you yourself are talking about a world government?
            - I will not argue here, this question requires observation, analysis, and study. Therefore, I tried to build a version here, but for now I will limit myself to stating a fact. Thank you and respect.
      2. 11111mail.ru
        11111mail.ru 22 May 2014 20: 50
        -6
        Quote: Sacmagon
        The authorities simply use the euphoria associated with the annexation of Crimea, in order to tighten the nuts for the population
        Somehow I read to entoy phrases, and realized that he didn’t understand anything.

        Probably read "in another reality" or another article, because the article does not contain the words quoted by you. It turns out that you read just an introduction...
        I attach the verification picture.
        1. Mihaylo Tishayshiy
          Mihaylo Tishayshiy 22 May 2014 21: 11
          +1
          Quote: 11111mail.ru
          Probably read "in another reality" or another article, since the article does not contain the words you quoted. It turns out that you only read the introduction ...
          I attach the verification picture.

          Open your eyes. Read the paragraph right above the "window" of your request (not "notepad", but "find") in the verification picture you attached.
          1. 11111mail.ru
            11111mail.ru 22 May 2014 21: 32
            -3
            Quote: Mihaylo Tishayshiy
            Open your eyes.

            Here is a piece of the article from the beginning to the title (section) indicated by the opponent:
            "Binding of the ruble to the dollar - the neo-colonial method of financial policy"
            Kudrin left, but his case lives, the expert states
            A draft federal law “On Amendments to the Federal Law“ On the Federal Budget for 2014 Year and for the Planning Period of 2015 and 2016 ”was promulgated. The essence of the document is that the government does not intend to abandon the “budget rule”.
            We appealed to State Duma deputy Vyacheslav Tetyokin with a request to comment on the budget and financial policy of our country.
            Power simply uses the euphoria associated with the annexation of the Crimea
            The words "to tighten the screws for the population" are not contained in it! Pay attention to your comment.
            1. Sakmagon
              Sakmagon 22 May 2014 21: 43
              +2
              The words "to tighten the screws for the population" are not contained in it!

              Dear "Two educations, two specialties"!
              I won’t swear. I suggest - after Power simply uses the euphoria associated with the annexation of the Crimea - fourth paragraph.

              To guarantee mutual understanding - showing: hi
              1. 11111mail.ru
                11111mail.ru 23 May 2014 07: 02
                0
                Quote: Sacmagon
                To guarantee mutual understanding -

                Do not understand each other means ... Well then, please apologize! crying
      3. joum
        joum 22 May 2014 21: 08
        0
        Also, at once there was a desire to see what kind of philologist reflects))
    2. Recon
      Recon 22 May 2014 21: 12
      -3
      The ruble is pegged to the dollar simply because all our goods are traded for the dollar, which changes into rubles. That’s all. What conclusion can be drawn from this?
    3. Sterlya
      Sterlya 22 May 2014 21: 24
      +2
      Said nothing. The economist. pancake.
    4. Penzyac
      Penzyac 22 May 2014 23: 36
      +1
      Quote: roman72-452
      It’s necessary to leave the peg to the dollar, but it’s better to leave gradually so that we ourselves lose as little as possible on it, although we would already talk about it well.

      Well, that’s good, but you need to leave the buck immediately and without warning, so as not to give the enemy the possibility of counteraction.
  2. ia-ai00
    ia-ai00 22 May 2014 18: 53
    +10
    So I never cease to wonder why the "persons" who ruined the country's economy and subordinated it to the interests of the United States still "rule" the Russian economy, and not sit where traitors and thieves of the Motherland are supposed to sit?
    1. Troitsky
      Troitsky 22 May 2014 19: 01
      +5
      Well, Menshikov sat with Peter, and Litvinov with Stalin for the time being. The untouchables.
      Some answers are given by Evgenia Pismennaya's book "Sestem Kudrin". I recommend to read.

      http://www.ozon.ru/context/detail/id/20907002/

      What is this book about
      The book of Evgenia Pismennaya is the story of the Russian government and the Russian economy, told on behalf of the people who created it: ministers, deputies, economists and entrepreneurs. This is a story about the unknown side of Putin's economic and political course, his unexpected alliance with the liberals and the collapse of this strange alliance.

      After reading the book, you will learn:
      - how key economic decisions were made in post-Soviet Russia: from liberal reforms to the default of the 1990s, from the first reforms of Putin to national projects and the Olympics in Sochi;
      - what is behind the high-profile cases of the 2000s - the case of Yukos, Sergei Storchak, the sale of the Bank of Moscow;
      - which people controlled and continue to manage our economy;
      - who really is Aleksey Kudrin - the main economist of the Putin era. Why does he continue to enjoy influence in the government, even after leaving it.
      1. ia-ai00
        ia-ai00 22 May 2014 19: 50
        0
        Thank! I will definitely read it.
  3. Signaller
    Signaller 22 May 2014 18: 55
    +1
    Real estate tax is generally a non-negotiable item, and things are still there. Apparently interferes with someone from the government. There are a lot of real estate.
  4. Friday
    Friday 22 May 2014 18: 55
    +1
    Doodles, make machines and print dollars!
  5. soyuz-nik
    soyuz-nik 22 May 2014 18: 55
    +2
    Good health, I wish! hi

    I can’t understand what time we live in: either in the era of feudal oligarchy, or in the era of oligarchic feudalism ....

    People under patriotic cheers-euphoria is ready to applaud and tighten their belts .... The gap between the incomes of the rich and the poor is off scale .... The oligarchs, unfortunately, will not touch anyone .... They know too much ....

    It is possible that if the economy of the Russian Federation becomes tight, maybe then - a small victorious war? .......
  6. Arh
    Arh 22 May 2014 18: 56
    +1
    The Ruble Should Be The World Currency !!!
  7. DanSabaka
    DanSabaka 22 May 2014 18: 57
    +1
    Yeah. Take and share! like Sharikov ...
  8. Same lech
    Same lech 22 May 2014 19: 01
    +1
    Need to go from pegging to the dollar

    We’ve been leaving for 20 years.
    The team of MEDVEDEV is liberals in the economy and they will not let anyone change their previous Gaidar policy.
    An erected monument in Moscow to HAIDAR ... TO THE LOVER OF SHOCK THERAPY IN THE ECONOMY says a lot.
    1. Karabin
      Karabin 22 May 2014 22: 57
      +1
      Quote: The same LYOKHA
      The team of MEDVEDEV is liberals in the economy and they will not let anyone change their previous Gaidar policy.

      Even to Great Putin ?!
  9. Ivan 63
    Ivan 63 22 May 2014 19: 05
    +4
    Monopoly on alcohol, tobacco, sugar, housing and communal services, education and politics without Yeltsinoids-Gaidarites.
  10. APASUS
    APASUS 22 May 2014 19: 07
    +1
    It’s time to take up the economy, otherwise we are not far from the crisis, and Ukraine has nothing to do with it.
    It is worth taking the peg to gold as a basis, this will help to avoid the influence of the dollar on the economy. There was another proposal, for example, to make an energy ruble, its value is always equal to 6 sq. H. energy.
    And it’s time to put a dollar into the furnace!
  11. v245721
    v245721 22 May 2014 19: 21
    +2
    a lot of text but no sense from him. one thank you
  12. VADEL
    VADEL 22 May 2014 19: 26
    +1
    Third is the reduction of corruption.

    It is invincible in Russia, like fools and roads.
  13. Giant thought
    Giant thought 22 May 2014 19: 28
    +1
    Fifth pillar to stake, the only way we can get rid of pro-American henchmen, otherwise all of us will eventually be put on mattress mattresses when they come to our territories bought from our national predecessors. The deliverance of Russia from librests is the path that will lead Russia to prosperity, and accordingly, all of us.
  14. Makk
    Makk 22 May 2014 19: 34
    0
    Binding the ruble to at least gold, even to oil, will not help. The development of industry and agriculture, as well as the curbing of their show-offs, is the only way (under the current system, this is utopia).
    Now we acknowledge that WE sold the USSR for jeans and chewing gum, so jeans and chewing gum regularly arrive in the country, what are we paying for this now?
    1. Sour
      Sour 22 May 2014 20: 37
      +1
      Not minus and not plus. Together with sound thoughts I see a purely propaganda ringing.
      1. joum
        joum 22 May 2014 20: 57
        -1
        I also immediately remembered that we had already budgeted $ XNUMX for the "democratization of the Russian Federation." They begin to master funds, it seems ((
  15. Sergey Eagle
    Sergey Eagle 22 May 2014 19: 37
    -1
    Even somehow not surprising. But the situation with financial management must be changed towards the people.
  16. gandalf
    gandalf 22 May 2014 19: 49
    +1
    Finance in Russia is managed by the Central Bank. Read the law on the Central Bank. The Ministry of Finance is just bookkeeping, which records the income and makes the expenditure of funds, does not have a big impact on politics.

    You need to hit the center - the Central Bank. Nationalization of the Central Bank.

    PS Few people know that the Central Bank of the Russian Federation became private in ... 1990 a year, in December, on New Year's Eve, like the Fed in the USA ...
    1. Sour
      Sour 22 May 2014 21: 15
      -2
      Quote: gandalf
      Nationalization of the Central Bank.

      It is impossible to nationalize the Central Bank even more, because it is already a state structure. "Nationalization of the Central Bank" is something like "nationalization of the Ministry of Internal Affairs" or something like that. You may have read the law on the Central Bank, but not very carefully.
      The Central Bank is a financial regulator. It is independent both in the USA and even in China. Its independence from the government is necessary if we do not want the government to become completely overwhelmed and create complete lawlessness in the financial sphere. Of course, you can subordinate the Central Bank to the government. But you can subordinate to him the Supreme Court, the Prosecutor General, and the State Duma. Personally, I do not see anything good about it. This will be a huge step towards the elimination of a market economy. Is it necessary? It's not the same for everybody.
    2. Sour
      Sour 22 May 2014 21: 40
      0
      Quote: gandalf
      like the Fed in the USA ...

      The US Federal Reserve is a government agency, not a private shop. It has the status of a federal agency, such as NASA or the NSA.
      The head of the Fed is appointed by the President of the United States for a term of 4 years. Once a year, the Fed reports to Congress.
      The Fed Governing Council is also appointed by the President and approved by Congress.
      All the same applies to the Central Bank, in relation to Russia.
      Of course, the Central Bank and the Fed have private assets, but they were even in the Soviet State Bank. If I keep money in a bank, this does not mean at all that I am the owner of this bank. Or at least a co-owner.
      Tales about the fact that the Fed and the Central Bank are private companies were invented for fools. If you do not want to look stupid, do not repeat this nonsense. She’s not even funny anymore.
      Oh my god, how much financial illiteracy you find on the net ... horror!
  17. Repty
    Repty 22 May 2014 20: 08
    +1
    Bind the ruble to gas is a decision that will overturn amers. Why is there a petrodollar, but no gas-powered one?
    1. Sour
      Sour 22 May 2014 20: 51
      0
      Quote: Repty
      Why is there a petrodollar, but no gas-powered one?

      Because the global gas market is not comparable with the oil market.
      But that's not the point. There is no "petrodollar", there is just a dollar. And do not get hung up on the fact that it is being traded. As far as I know, even the latest gas deal between Russia and China is in dollars, not rubles and yuan. There are reasons for this. And don't think that trading is for cash dollars. More often than not, the dollar is just a unit of account.
      The ruble is now impossible to compete with the dollar, regardless of the patriotic fervor. Because the Russian economy is less than a third of the US. This is an objective reality. If anything, the USSR also sold oil for dollars, and this was no accident.
      To make your currency global, you need to raise Russia's level in global GDP, and not just threaten with a skinny fist to the whole World, as some here offer.
      Quote: Repty
      Snap ruble to gas is a decision that will overturn amers

      It will not overturn them. Russian oil and gas trade is very significant (especially in Europe), but not so much as to determine the entire world economy. The vast majority of the World (including the United States) does not depend on the Russian trade in hydrocarbons.
      And then, decide what is most important for you - to develop the Russian economy or "overthrow the United States." They are not the same at all. In the first case, you are a patriot of Russia. In the second case, you are no different from the Bandera, who do not care about their country, just to do a small dirty trick for a foreign country. Your "topple the United States" is no different from Bandera's "destroy Russia." Well, if you overturn them, but what about the Russian people?
  18. vesti010
    vesti010 22 May 2014 20: 20
    0
    Yes, what is the point of discussing the 5th column, the Central Bank, the United States, if our government has a shit! Putin is good at geopolitics, but he doesn’t restore order in the country's leadership.
  19. Makk
    Makk 22 May 2014 20: 32
    +1
    Before minus, answer WHAT NOW DO WE PAY FOR JEANS AND GUM? THEY ARE VERY NEEDED TO US?
  20. kaa1977
    kaa1977 22 May 2014 20: 58
    +1
    The fact that the Central Bank is boring has long been known to everyone.

    The fact that in the social sphere and education less and less dough is already evident ...

    Nothing new.

    Well, and what we should do there - yes, but to those who should - they are poher. They take care of their places and pockets. Caring for the neighbor - now it’s not fashionable with us. Only business and nothing personal is the anthem of modern bouroisia.
    1. Sour
      Sour 22 May 2014 21: 19
      0
      Quote: kaa1977
      The fact that in the social sphere and education less and less dough is already evident ...

      Appropriations for expenditure budget items are allocated by the State Duma, and not the Central Bank. To whom to give money - it is described in the Budget Law.
      You poorly imagine the functions of the Central Bank. It will be much more interesting to read your comments when you understand these issues.
  21. siberalt
    siberalt 22 May 2014 22: 09
    -1
    The detachment from the dollar cost Gaddafi you know what. Russia is embedded in the dollar-based global economy. And there is no way without a reserve currency. Russia alone cannot change anything. These are realities. The euro has not changed anything here either. And there are half a billion of them, which are in euros. Let's wait for China to mature. Here "twitching" is fraught.
    1. topicrange
      topicrange 3 August 2015 12: 51
      0
      These are the generals-marshals who betray the interests of Russia in favor of the United States, because there are much more such traitors-marshals in Russia than normal ones who need to twitch, you need to resist the dollar system, but judging by how quickly you got the marshal, Russia there is no chance of winning over the dollar. And now you scare the national leader of Putin the fate of Gaddafi? Yes you are real treacherous junk.
  22. Stalnov I.P.
    Stalnov I.P. 22 May 2014 22: 14
    +1
    I will not comment on the article, there are simply official statistics, GDP 2013, a little more than 1%, the first quarter of 2014 is about the same, while China gives more than 7% of GDP, it turns out that CHINESE rulers are 7 times smarter than ours, while we are a country possessing more than 30% of the world's natural resources and it turns out either they are mediocrity or this crime against my people I do not see otherwise.
  23. Sergg
    Sergg 22 May 2014 22: 22
    -1
    Do not touch the dollar - this is the best weapon against America, it is the dollar that will kill them without any war. Overproduction of the dollar sounds ridiculous, but this is how the international financial bubble is built, leads to the depreciation of the dollar and ultimately to the collapse of the credit system due to which the world economy exists.
    Also, let's not forget that the dollar does not belong to the United States, but is the property of the Fed not a state commercial structure. Therefore, it is better to spit on foreign currency and strengthen your ruble, for this it is necessary to raise our economy - this is the main thing, and not the fall or rise of the dollar there.
    1. Saratoga833
      Saratoga833 23 May 2014 08: 00
      +1
      But how to strengthen the economy if the ruble directly depends on the dollar? Why in the days of Stalin, without any dollars, the country was raised from ruins? Why does the central bank report to the Fed? There is only one answer - our large-capacity thieves, called oligarchs, are tied only to the dollar. You listen to the Muscovites. They have all prices and calculations only in dollars. I know firsthand that he was in contact with Moscow doctors and economists.
    2. topicrange
      topicrange 3 August 2015 12: 53
      0
      The key to your treacherous essence is this saying do not touch the dollar. Seen to save up in bucks? I hate the corrupt ones, and those who became corrupt only because they have stock in dollars. Thanks in advance for the cons, I do not chase the ranks.
  24. 54RG3
    54RG3 22 May 2014 22: 38
    +3
    Quote: Sour
    Quote: gandalf
    like the Fed in the USA ...

    The US Federal Reserve is a government agency, not a private shop. It has the status of a federal agency, such as NASA or the NSA.
    The head of the Fed is appointed by the President of the United States for a term of 4 years. Once a year, the Fed reports to Congress.
    The Fed Governing Council is also appointed by the President and approved by Congress.
    All the same applies to the Central Bank, in relation to Russia.
    Of course, the Central Bank and the Fed have private assets, but they were even in the Soviet State Bank. If I keep money in a bank, this does not mean at all that I am the owner of this bank. Or at least a co-owner.
    Tales about the fact that the Fed and the Central Bank are private companies were invented for fools. If you do not want to look stupid, do not repeat this nonsense. She’s not even funny anymore.
    Oh my god, how much financial illiteracy you find on the net ... horror!

    Financial illiteracy is, perhaps, at your address. The Fed is NOT a government agency, it is a PRIVATE shop. Interested - here
    http://www.federalreserve.gov/aboutthefed/bios/board/default.htm
    Board members are approved by the President and the Senate (seven members for a term of 14! Years each. The Chairman and Vice Chairman actually hold office for 4 years, but bad luck - "tenure as chairman does not affect his status as a board member"). That is, he spent 4 years as chairman, elected his comrade from among seven, and the next president waved his signature. And if the president will oppose - let us recall what happened to D. Kennedy ... The President of the United States, elected for a term of 4 years, cannot in any way influence the member of the Federal Reserve Board, who is elected for 14 years!

    On the question of the Central Bank - "it is not an organ of state power, at the same time, its powers by their legal nature relate to the functions of state power, since their implementation presupposes the use of measures of state coercion." taken from here http://www.cbr.ru/today/?PrtId=bankstatus
    That is, the bank is not state-owned, I want to let Russia print money, I don’t want to, but I must follow my instructions ... You, gentlemen from the Fed and the Central Bank, have completely messed up the rams. You will be cured only by the immediate nationalization of the ruble and the Central Bank.
    "If I keep money in a bank, this does not mean at all that I am the owner of this bank. Or at least a co-owner."
    This means that your money belongs to the owner or co-owner of the bank. But you earned them with your labor, and he printed as much as he wanted. But he didn’t want to - he created a mortgage crisis, and took your property (if any) for debts ...
    Attention to the question - why the hell with the state is a bank that does not obey it, but obeys a country that is likely to be the enemy? And who needs to be cleaned out of the Kremlin to stop this chaos (I give a hint, the Great and Terrible is already engaged in you) ...
    PySy. And 30 yards, you already began to work out ... Pesho ischo - master
    1. Sour
      Sour 23 May 2014 13: 36
      0
      You have not given a single argument in favor of the fact that the Fed is a private shop. I emphasize - NOT ONE.
      It is impossible to bring them, because it is impossible to prove the unprovable.
      All you wrote is a set of quotes that proves nothing.
      The Fed is no more private than the FBI.
      Quote: 54RG3
      This means that your money belongs to the owner or co-owner of the bank.

      Go, treat your head. You need it. If I made a deposit to the bank, then this my money, they remained mine. But it didn’t my bank. To become a co-owner of a bank I have to buy his sharesand not just make a contribution.
      Once again for the dumbest idiots - You cannot become the owner or co-owner of the Fed. Because it not a joint stock company, but a federal agency. Read the law on the Fed, Mr. ignoramus.
      And the top and d and otism - to consider the independence of the Fed or the Central Bank as a private form of ownership.
      Quote: 54RG3
      Attention to the question - to hell with the state a bank that does not obey it

      Obeying the state and obeying the government are not the same thing.
      Although I admit that for komunyak this does not matter, due to their stupidity and illiteracy.
      Quote: 54RG3
      You will be cured only by the immediate nationalization of the ruble and the Central Bank.

      How can you nationalize what already belongs to the state ??? I mean the Central Bank. And the "nationalization of the ruble" - what's this ??? Is this a joke? Does the komunyak have such stupid humor?
      Pesci escho, victim of the exam. It is gratifying that komunyak has so little literacy and brains. With such a shortage of gray matter, you will never return to power. And that’s great.
      1. 54RG3
        54RG3 23 May 2014 18: 37
        0
        Mr. liberalist, did I even give you a link, which is too lazy to go through?
        The Fed consists of 7 board members and 12 reserve banks -

        http://federalreserve.gov/pubs/frseries/frseri.htm

        And the ownership of reserve banks is joint-stock. There are no private banks in the US
        (http://books.google.by/books?id=BdS4AAAAQBAJ&pg=RA2-PT110&lpg=RA2-PT110&dq=%D0%
        B3%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%83%D0%B4%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8B
        %D0%B5+%D0%B1%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%B8+%D1%81%D1%88%D0%B0&source=bl&ots=mY_7xMTxe
        N&sig=NZvlOG2dinc3Y9wDDkotHMpAues&hl=ru&sa=X&ei=cld_U4jzHOewyAP84IHYDA&ved=0CEoQ
        6AEwBQ#v=onepage&q=%D0%B3%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%83%D0%B4%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B2%
        D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8B%D0%B5%20%D0%B1%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%B8%20%D1%81%D1%88%D0
        % B0 & f = false) Money. Credit. Banks: study guide
        Authors: Elena Efimova, Adik Aliev

        And you cannot become a shareholder of the Fed because the club has been closed since the founding of the Bank of England - but this is a completely different story. This is not a history lesson.

        So learn yourself for now ...

        And in the Congress Act on the Federal Reserve, what should I find? show me where it says that the Fed is an agency with a state form of ownership. This is impossible to do because you are either mistaken or intentionally distort the facts (which is more likely).

        Obeying a state or a government that is elected to govern a state on behalf of the people is not a big difference. Compared to subordinating to the interests of the financial and industrial oligarchs of another country, it’s all babble.

        The issue of nationalization of the ruble is not a simple one, I will not write a sheet of text. It is enough to say that loans for the development of production in your country should be issued at more favorable rates than foreign banks - you need to be able to issue money in your country without reference to the level of gold and foreign exchange reserves (bonds of the country of the likely opponent).

        So the question is this - first untie the ruble from the dollar. Then, the change of ownership from private to state. Do not confuse the finger and you yourself know what

        All of you perfectly understand, only confuse many. Surely your interest in this is. How much is the motherland?
    2. Sour
      Sour 23 May 2014 13: 53
      0
      Quote: 54RG3
      And the president will oppose - recall what happened to D. Kennedy ...

      What happened to Kennedy? Did the Fed kill him?
      Do not pass off your versions as facts. Moreover, do not refer to them as facts. Versions are versions, Mr. Communist dreamer.
      The Great and Terrible is already engaged in you) ...

      Wow, how scared ... komunyaki really believe that Putin is sleeping and sees how to return them to power? Wake up, comrade communists. Putin is not as dumb as you think.
  25. sssr
    sssr 22 May 2014 23: 20
    +1
    It is necessary to keep the oligarch on a short leash, an example scenario Ukraine. The Americans invest the proceeds for the cardon, catch them on their kukan and dictate the conditions for using the funds. It has long been clear to everyone that trading for rubles will only benefit Russia. However, the lobby will not do this in the near future. And the fact that analysts argue that it will only do harm is false.
  26. Andersen68
    Andersen68 23 May 2014 06: 04
    +1
    An article with a hint ... and a good hint about the role of the Central Bank. The author mentioned it in passing, but made it clear that the Central Bank is subject to NATIONALIZATION!
  27. Sour
    Sour 23 May 2014 13: 48
    0
    Someone fired a bullet on the Internet from the fact that the Fed is a private office. This bullet continues to fly on the Internet. It’s still a mystery to me - why such a meaningless lie? Is this such propaganda against the USA? But what is the propaganda pathos? Like, since private property, is it bad?
    I leave it out of brackets.
    Again - The Fed is no more private office than the CIA or the FBI. The Fed is part of the American state, not a bunch of private bankers. The same applies to the Russian Central Bank. Only boob or conscious liar may impersonate independence from government for private ownership. The Supreme Court and the Prosecutor General’s Office are also independent of the government, but no one calls them private offices. But the Central Bank for some reason called. Either by stupidity, or it is not clear why. Only boob or conscious liar may call the transfer to government control "nationalization". Nationalization is a change in the form of ownership, not a change in subordination.
    1. 54RG3
      54RG3 23 May 2014 18: 41
      +1
      See above on the stock status of the Fed. Private ownership of a garage, house, car is not bad. The monopoly on the management of financial and natural resources in private hands is the embodiment of evil!
      1. Sour
        Sour 23 May 2014 19: 44
        0
        Where is "higher"?
        A hundred times it was said to the ignoramus that the Fed has the status of a federal agency.
        There is private infrastructure only. Plus some assets. The head of the Fed is not elected (as in joint-stock companies), but is appointed for a fixed term by the president. And the members of the board of governors are also not elected by anyone, but appointed. Yes, for a long time. To ensure the independence of the Fed as a financial regulator.
        Banks that are members of the Fed can only make a profit (and a fixed one, independent of the rate of return) in exchange for a deposit. It `s naturally. Otherwise, no one will invest money.
        But they do not participate in the selection of the Fed management, do not participate in reserve management. And their membership in the Fed cannot be sold or ceded to anyone. (Section 327 of the Federal Reserve Act). They can only log out if they want, or if their state deprives them of a license.
        The law spells out stocks of member banks ("Federal Reserve Bank shares"), not about Fed shares in general. Those do not exist.
        Once every six months, the Fed reports to a special congressional committee. Once a year, it is audited.
  28. Begemot
    Begemot 23 May 2014 16: 02
    0
    Touches naivety. Russia is a poor, I stress, a poor country. All our wealth is potential. The capitalization of the country is so low that it is comparable to the capitalization of any one large transnational financial or insurance group. And given the pile of legislation compiled from the West, our economy will remain only potentially powerful. China made a tremendous breakthrough, including because it abandoned the Western model of regulation of all spheres of the economy. Now they have an economy and it can be gradually, without straining, brought to the Western model. And our, if I may say so, the rulers want to immediately create an ideal model, where everything is at the highest world level, and then they are surprised: "Why is the economy not growing ??, if it were not for oil and gas, they would have gone all over the world! thousands of laws to pass can help our economy rise. " That is why it is profitable in China to sew shorts, T-shirts, but we do not have it, and all because our manufacturers are waving their legs and arms more and more energetically in ritual dances to comply with the law. Until it reaches the "arbiters of our destinies", no independent financial policy is possible.
    Recently, the director of a manufacturing company complained: help me find suppliers of components, got off my feet, everywhere such prices suggest that it is better to close the plant. Gave him a pair of phones of contracting firms in China. On the same day I found everything, at a price in 2,5-3 times lower than ours, and even bring it ourselves. That’s the whole financial policy.
    1. Sour
      Sour 23 May 2014 16: 45
      0
      Quote: Begemot
      That's why in China it’s profitable to sew underpants, T-shirts, but we don’t

      Was recently in "Auchan", 10 days ago. I bought a lot of cheap textiles - socks, panties, T-shirts, summer shoes, a shirt and a cap. Bought an electric kettle and a non-stick frying pan. I bought a car glass cleaner, a seat cleaner and a sewer blockage remover. And at least something Chinese. For some reason, everything is made in Russia. Even though you go and complain - after all, according to the words of the "all-spreading people", this should not happen.
      Quote: Begemot
      China made a grand leap, including because it abandoned the Western model of regulating all areas of the economy.

      Could you name the period when China followed Western standards of regulation and then abandoned them?
      Rather, China made a breakthrough by abandoning socialism, and not from Western standards.
      And we cannot copy the Chinese "leap", because there is no longer, and no longer, the surplus of the rural population, due to the low tide of which it is possible to make extensive industrialization to the cities.
  29. 54RG3
    54RG3 23 May 2014 20: 55
    +1
    Quote: Sour
    Where is "higher"?
    There is private infrastructure only. Plus some assets.


    Yeah, does private mean all the same? When they pinned to the wall. Well, at least thanks for that. And federal does not mean state, just as First National Bank was not the first ... From the federal there is only a name. Disguise it.

    When it comes to controlling the issue of the dollar and shaping financial policy, it’s a federal shop, and when it’s responsibility, it’s independent, private and inviolable. In general, everything is clear with you - the double standards of the liberals have long gotten everyone.

    And you also merged about the term, but at first you pushed everyone that they say only for 4 years, modestly silent about 14 years in the status of a member of the board ...

    To quit is ridiculous. Who refuses such assets?

    The main profit of the Fed is from the issue of the dollar, which they lend to the US government and the world through various instruments such as the IMF, as well as the formation of financial policies and the ability to periodically manage crises, buying up real assets at a cheap price. Moreover, there is a difference between hired managers, such as the head of the Fed, board members, and the US president, too, and OWNERS of this system. You will not argue that the government owns the Fed, I hope? Although it will become with you. But you yourself know all the ins and outs, it just infuriates you when all your lies are brought to clean water.

    In general, everything is clear with you, Mr. Neoliberal. Provocateur you
  30. topicrange
    topicrange 3 August 2015 12: 56
    0
    Topwar website sold to amers. No wonder. Bucks are an effective way to combat patriotism. Or with those who understand patriotism so arrogantly profits. Thanks in advance for demotion to privates, hahahaha))))