According to the news agency Rex 5 in May, an expert hearing “Humanitarian perspectives of Nazism” took place in Moscow at the Hotel National, which were eventually devoted to the coup d'état and the civil war in Ukraine.
In this regard, it is indicative of the fact that no other Russian news agency reported on this event, despite the urgency and relevance of the current situation in Ukraine. And this in itself testifies that these “expert hearings” were nothing more than yet another campaign meeting between a group of people with a predetermined biased position, trying to get a new portion of PR and mental agony in the crest of a wave of public interest to the problem of the Russian and Russian-speaking population of Ukraine. transactions. If there was something else, then the pro-Kremlin television channels and publications would surely spread the news of these experts to the whole world, but for some reason they did not show the slightest interest to them, which clearly reflects the level and quality of the content of this event, as well as the attitude to him by the official authorities of Russia. It is for this reason that the participants of these “expert hearings” have to be content with the fact that their personal opinion is distributed by the Rex news agency, and not by the leading Russian and world media.
And how could it be otherwise? Ponder the title of this event - “The Humanitarian Perspective of Nazism”. Does Nazism, condemned by the International Nuremberg Tribunal back in 1946, have at least some kind of “humanitarian perspective”? And is it not blasphemous to seriously discuss this topic in Russia, which 70 years ago defeated Nazism during the Great Patriotic War. Moreover, to raise and discuss such a discourse on the eve of the Victory Day? I think that the organizers of these permissions to say “expert hearings” are not all right with common sense and historical memory. If it were different, they would have come up with some other name more appropriate to the reality and realities of modern Russia for their event. In the meantime, it turns out that they not only welcome the resuscitation of Nazism in Ukraine, as well as in other parts of the post-Soviet space, but also “with a scientific look of a connoisseur” absolutely seriously discuss whether he has and what kind of “humanitarian prospects” not only closest to Russia abroad, but also in Russia itself. Is this the reason why the event fell under the complete information blockade or “ignore”, speaking the modern content language of the Internet, from the official mass media of our country? Even the foreign policy opponents of the current Russian leadership, ready to cling to every word, just to blacken the plans and actions of our country, even the pro-Maidan Ukrainian media, have ignored the fact of this “expert hearing”, since even it seemed to them absurd and deliberately brutal. And only IA Rex, fulfilling the will of the organizers of the discussion of the “humanitarian prospects of Nazism”, was forced to inform the world about what happened.
The backstage and even closeness (in the Hotel National, right at the very walls of the Kremlin) of expert hearings “The Humanitarian Perspectives of Nazism” are not in doubt. Had the Russian public been aware of them at least a little, our patriotic fellow citizens would surely ask for participation — various kinds of antifa, Cossacks, searchers, Afghans, young activists of the pro-Putin groups Nashi, Molodaya Gvardiya, and United Russia. ”And so on, which are necessarily and very intelligibly, what is called“ on the body ”, would explain to the representatives of the“ expert community ”gathered there and the journalists of the Rex news agency who joined them, what kind of“ humanitarian perspectives ”does Nazism have today and in Russia. But this event, I repeat, was closed, almost “for the elect”, and there the questions of the “humanitarian perspectives of Nazism” discussed how, in the Soviet years, it was customary to speak ironically about backstage actions and decisions of the party-communist nomenclature, “a narrow circle of limited people".
The intellectual limitations of the representatives of the “expert community” who gathered at the National Hotel for a hearing can be clearly illustrated by the example of the speech of the representative of the “national liberation movement” of the Talysh people Fakhraddin Aboszoda, the text of which is published on his portal IA Rex. It begins with a very unambiguous verbal passage about the need to introduce a totalitarian regime in Russia. How else to interpret the following quotation of the author: “I can hardly be accused of a special love for“ 1937 year ”, but at the same time it is obvious that without 37 there would not have been 9 of May! Therefore, the leadership of Russia should immediately begin to address a number of urgent measures in order to “clean up” the internal field of the country in order to consolidate all sectors of society in the face of the impending external threat. ” We will not play wordplay and will not ask this person what exactly "special love" differs from "just love" in intensity of expression and perception. However, taking this opportunity, we remind him that every manifestation of nationalism, and Fakhraddin Aboszoda himself, without even hiding it, is a Talysh nationalist, in 1937 was a qualifying sign of “bourgeois counter-revolutionary activity”, punished in accordance with the notorious 58 article of the Criminal Code RSFSR imprisonment for a term of 3-s to the death penalty inclusive. At the same time, he should remember that he did not provide for the sanction of this article for additional qualifying signs differentiating punishment. In other words, the punishment measure depended not on the composition of the criminal act, but on the personality of the person against whom criminal repression was applied. Simply put, since Mr. Aboszoda spoke aloud about Talysh nationalism or about the self-determination of any territory on a national basis, in 1937, only one prospect waited for him - shooting, as happened that year with many leaders of the Soviet government in Transcaucasia, whose political roots went back in time to the activities of national socialist parties, ranging from the Azerbaijani “Gummet” to the Armenian “Gnchak”, not to mention the overtly nationalist “Musavat” or “Dashkantsut youn.
Therefore, before calling on the political leadership of the Russian Federation for the restoration of the 1937 regime of the year, Fakhraddin Aboszoda should have thought several times with his (and not someone else's) head that after his speech at 5 on May at expert hearings about the “humanitarian perspectives of Nazism” in specifically, the historical conditions of 1937, he would not even have been sent to air the brains of nationalist nonsense to logging or gold-bearing mines in the area of Magadan, but simply to knock them out with a soft revolver bullet in the basements of Lubyanka . Probably, Mr. Aboszoda never in his life read the words of Georges Jacques Danton, spoken to him before the execution of the guillotine, that “the revolution devours its children”, which in the years of the Great French Revolution, read. Otherwise, he, relying on someone else's historical experience, would not have called for preventive reprisals on the heads of other people, remembering that the situation could change drastically, and he himself would fall under the flywheel of ““ cleaning ”the internal field. But this is not the point, this author has more interesting “revelations”.
Two paragraphs below, Fakhraddin Aboszoda writes: “... today the greatest danger to Russia is not those people whom we call champions of fascism. The real enemies of Russia in such conditions are those people who occupy high seats in the power system and special services in the center and in the localities, which can safely be classified as national traitors. ” This quote once again shows that its author is extremely poorly acquainted with the history of the Great Purge of the 1937 of the year and the essence of the charges brought against it by repressed people. Let him know that almost all the “national traitors” who were exterminated in the 1930’s by the investigation or the court were somehow caught in counter-revolutionary relations with either the imperialists or the Nazis (namely, the Nazis and not the Nazis, as Mr. Aboszoda writes because the German Nazis laid the foundation of their power in the National Socialist Party, and the Italian fascists in the unions). In those years, between the champion of Nazism (but not fascism) and the "national traitor" an equal sign was unequivocally put. The lack of understanding of this fact by Mr. Aboszod clearly indicates a true understanding, or rather, a complete lack of understanding of the most important nuances of the political and legal history of mankind.
Immediately after the passage quoted above, Fakhraddin Aboszoda writes: “With such a huge army of national traitors, the leadership can only rectify the situation with the help of the new“ McCarthy Law ”. It is difficult to understand exactly what this person has in mind when he speaks of the “McCarthy law”. Any university law graduate who more or less seriously studied the history of state and law in foreign countries is aware that supporters and followers of the ideology of the American Republican senator from the state of Wisconsin Joseph Raymond McCarthy passed two laws: in June 1952, the Bill of Restriction Bill Migration and Communist Control Act 1954. None of these US laws bore the name McCarthy, although the second of them was sometimes called that, but only in Soviet propaganda publications. Fahraddin Aboszoda should have studied better those aspects of the general history on which he wants to speak with his “expert opinion”. Ratuya about transferring the practice of McCarthyism to the political life of modern Russia, because of his own lack of education, he does not even understand how this will turn out for him personally. If necessary for the state bureaucracy of Russia, the justification for obtaining Russian citizenship, by analogy with the norms of McCaren-Walter Bill on restricting migration, can easily be questioned, after which he will be deported to his historic homeland - to Azerbaijan, where he will be provided with a comfortable single room in remand prison MNB AR. I do not think that such a “humanitarian perspective of Nazism” will correspond to the life plans and aspirations of Mr. Abosszod, but he should always remember about it when he once again calls on the “witch hunt” on the heads of Russian citizens. After all, "" cleaning "of the inner field" can begin personally with him ...
The use of the phrase “McCarthy's law” in the political science context chosen by Mr. Aboszod in relation to the realities of modern Russia is devoid of any common sense, since this law (this is the “Communist Control Act of 1954 of the Year”) will not be directed against national traitors, but against the Communist the party of the Russian Federation, which today, as you know, firmly stands on the positions of great-power patriotism, and in no way national betrayal. Essentially, Mr. Aboszoda, in his unconscious enthusiasm, unwittingly, calls for organizing administrative reprisals against Russian citizens on a party political basis, which not only contradicts the provisions of Art. 19 of the Constitution of Russia, which guarantees its citizens formal legal equality, including regardless of their party affiliation, but also forms the composition of the criminal act provided for by Art. 1 of the Federal Law No. 114-FZ “On Countering Extremist Activities”. It is difficult to guess how the leader of the Russian Communists, Gennady Zyuganov, will relate to the verbal passages of Mr. Abosszod, but the reason for initiating judicial and investigative prosecutions against this man, and at the same time regarding IA Rex and the group of organizers of the expert hearing on the theme “Humanitarian perspectives of Nazism” in him has already. And if he suddenly wants to realize such an opportunity, then the probability of being in the detention center of the Ministry of National Security of the Republic of Azerbaijan in Lankaran with Fakhraddin Aboszod after deportation from Russia increases many times.
There are already plenty of grounds for bringing him to criminal responsibility for political extremism after being deported to their historic homeland. Whoever doubts this, can see the second part of his speech at the expert hearing “The Humanitarian Perspectives of Nazism”. We will not retell all his statements and conclusions here in order not to fall under charges of extremism. At the same time, there is one more quotation in the speech of Mr. Aboszod, who did not pass by our attention, namely: “... with respect to such states as the Azerbaijan Republic, Russia should conduct a rather decisive, I would say, even aggressive policy. Such states, created artificially at a certain stage in the history of Russia, have no right to continue their existence. ” Agree strongly said. At the same time, these words, published in the electronic mass media, themselves form the corpus delicti provided for in Art. 354 of the Criminal Code, which establishes criminal liability for "public calls for the outbreak of an aggressive war." It is difficult for us to say what Fakhraddin Aboszoda was guided by, uttering these words at the expert hearings on “The humanitarian perspectives of Nazism” we do not understand why these words were decided to be posted on his portal by the Rex news agency. But it is quite obvious to us that these gentlemen, as they say, have already “got” into a criminal article regarding themselves. Russian human rights defenders of any party or ethnicity who wish to make themselves socially positive PR on this blatant fact, it’s enough to apply to the Prosecutor General's Office of the Russian Federation and the FSB of Russia to get the appropriate publicity for themselves.
We can only wonder at the nonsense, thanks to which Fakhraddin Aboszoda, IA Rex and the organizers of expert hearings “The humanitarian perspectives of Nazism” at the National Hotel themselves created an evidential base of criminal prosecution against themselves. And sincere confession, as you know, is a direct road to prison.