Exercises with the use of heavy flamethrower systems TOC-1A

33
According to the press service of the Southern Military District, special tactical exercises with live firing of the modern heavy flamethrower system (TOC) Buratino and the upgraded Shmel-M infantry flamethrower (RPO) were planned for 23 on April.

Exercises with the use of heavy flamethrower systems TOC-1A


A total of 50 launches of 220-mm unguided rockets with a thermobaric warhead on 40 targets at a distance from 2 to 6 kilometers, as well as more 100 shots from RPO Shmel-M were planned.

The main task of the exercises is to train the crews and combat crews of actions on the march, as well as fulfillment of standards for the deployment and occupation of firing positions, their disguise and engineering support.

It is worth noting that the use of thermobaric projectile increased the firing range of the TOC-1А almost twice.
33 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    April 24 2014 14: 11
    Pinocchio is a thing, the Americans have nothing and nothing like that and will not be in the near future.
    1. +5
      April 24 2014 14: 25
      Bumblebee is awesome stuff too. And it was the "bumblebee" that the dushmans in Afghanistan called the "Shaitan-pipe"
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +5
      April 24 2014 14: 59
      But the MLRS "Smerch" also has such ammunition.

      9M55S - rocket with thermobaric warhead 9M216 "Excitement". One shell explosion creates a thermal field diameter not less 25 m (depending on the terrain). Field temperature - over 1000 ° C, lifetime - not less than 1,4 s. Designed to engage manpower, open and sheltered in open type fortifications and objects of unarmored and lightly armored military equipment. It is most effective in the steppe and desert, a city located on a non-hilly area. Ammunition tests were completed in 2004. By Order of the President of the Russian Federation No. 1288 of October 7, 2004, 9M55C was adopted by the Russian Army.
  2. +2
    April 24 2014 14: 12
    Wow! What a terrible thing!
  3. +12
    April 24 2014 14: 13
    It's time to teach with Pinocchio! Not going to visit Duremar? South District!
  4. -36
    April 24 2014 14: 14
    Quote: maks-xnumx
    Pinocchio is a thing, the Americans have nothing and nothing like that and will not be in the near future.


    wake up, they have a more complicated system .. Pinocchio this is the last century.
    1. +23
      April 24 2014 14: 24
      Which ones? It is possible in more detail. Especially about Western developments in terms of heavy flamethrower systems. Also, do not tell me which more or less significant systems of volley fire. If the troll is somehow more detailed.
    2. +7
      April 24 2014 16: 03
      And by the way, padskazhika please 290980, why do the majority of trolls have a number instead of a nickname? Is it bad with imagination, or is it such a salary?
      1. +3
        April 24 2014 19: 07
        This is the bot number. smile
      2. +1
        April 24 2014 20: 23
        Quote: serega.fedotov
        And by the way, padskazhika please 290980, why do the majority of trolls have a number instead of a nickname? Is it bad with imagination, or is it such a salary?

        And there is no name.
    3. +1
      April 24 2014 18: 16
      probably "papa carlo" and "cat basilio and olis forests"? enlighten if you can mister 290980
  5. tnship2
    +4
    April 24 2014 14: 15
    It is worth noting that the use of a thermobaric shell increased the firing range of TOS-1A almost twice. I didn’t understand anything, how does the firing range and thermobaric charge fit? And the weapon is really impressive.
  6. JoylyRoger
    +1
    April 24 2014 14: 15
    Such exercises are needed not only for the sake of combat work, but also as indicative for fans to rattle with weapons. And it would be nice to show on TV the destructive effect of CBT. Well, the article +
  7. +15
    April 24 2014 14: 16
    (CBT) Pinocchio
  8. +2
    April 24 2014 14: 17
    Flamethrowers are an excellent weapon, if applied in the case. So this weapon is even very necessary in our troops.
  9. -25
    April 24 2014 14: 32
    Quote: Buran
    Which ones? It is possible in more detail. Especially about Western developments in terms of heavy flamethrower systems. Also, do not tell me which more or less significant systems of volley fire. If the troll is somehow more detailed.

    The tactics of modern combat have changed, there will not be classic battles as in the 19th century, the crowd against the crowd, and therefore the MLRS have outlived themselves as a type of weaponry.
    1. +12
      April 24 2014 14: 38
      Well, you give a pancake !!!! DON'T KEEP OUT !!
    2. +7
      April 24 2014 14: 40
      Quote: 290980
      Quote: Buran
      Which ones? It is possible in more detail. Especially about Western developments in terms of heavy flamethrower systems. Also, do not tell me which more or less significant systems of volley fire. If the troll is somehow more detailed.

      The tactics of modern combat have changed, there will not be classic battles as in the 19th century, the crowd against the crowd, and therefore the MLRS have outlived themselves as a type of weaponry.

      You were asked a question, please answer it, and not talk about what will happen and what will not!
    3. copper49
      +6
      April 24 2014 14: 48
      Why "crowd against crowd"? A strike by the Buratino battery on the entrenched detachment of militants - and all that remains is to bury the rest of them. No wonder the small Kazakh army bought them. By the way, and "terminators" - for approximately similar purposes, the fight against terrorists in populated areas.
    4. +4
      April 24 2014 15: 35
      Quote: 290980
      The tactics of modern combat have changed, there will not be classic battles as in the 19th century, the crowd against the crowd, and therefore the MLRS have outlived themselves as a type of weaponry.


      Tactics, of course, have changed, high-precision weapons (which for some reason often hit inaccurately) and all that, only cities usually don’t surrender until tanks appear on their streets. Naturally with infantry. And in order to provide the tanks with an offensive, artillery is needed, including and MLRS.
    5. +2
      April 24 2014 15: 42
      What it means has changed, but the destruction of the enemy’s supply bases or convoys of enemy’s manpower accumulation equipment I understand this is a very promising type of weaponry and it is too early to write it off.
      1. +3
        April 24 2014 16: 11
        The main high-precision weapon is not very effective against individual shelters! A small detachment in urban conditions on a convenient and pre-prepared position, using deep helmets and underground passages can easily survive artillery and mortar shelling with conventional and even guided shells! Nobody can survive Pinocchio (sunshine) !!!!
    6. +3
      April 24 2014 16: 14
      You tell this to the Chinese under Tamansky, or to the Georgian punishers. If you think that a bunch of local conflicts unleashed by the United States, this is a real war, you are deeply mistaken. With modern air defense, in a global conflict, where two powerful groupings are facing each other, only artillery and MLRS have the ability to reach the enemy's front line of defense. Aviation in these conditions can be used basically as a transport support, well, or targeted strikes. Its massive use, "a la Hermann Goering" is impossible without catastrophic losses. Surprise, but in Chechnya, the classic schemes of battles and fortifications were used, from the same WWII, and on both sides, both in the first and second company.
    7. 0
      April 24 2014 18: 18
      there is nothing to eat but demogogy
  10. Voenruk
    +8
    April 24 2014 14: 33
    BOO! nanananan
    RA! nanananna
    TI! nanananan
    BUT! NA NA NA
    BU_RA_TI_NO! Xd
    1. +5
      April 24 2014 14: 40
      Quote: Voenruk
      BOO! nanananan
  11. +3
    April 24 2014 14: 42
    The device is very destructive. In the application is not unique, but for some tasks just a find! I agree, the range must be definitely increased!
  12. The comment was deleted.
  13. +5
    April 24 2014 14: 47
    Pinocchio - GOOD!
    But these mafynki were guarded, oh, how carefully, when they "worked" ...)))
    wink

    Photo: uploading "chemical pencils" to Buratinka.
    Good luck guys!
    good
    1. +3
      April 24 2014 14: 53
      Quote: Aleks tv
      But these mafynki were guarded, oh, how carefully, when they "worked" ...)))

      By the way, now Pinocchio guards on BMO-T.
      What ...
      wink
      Well done, chemists! Thanks to theirs Gena for "breaking through" this machine into production.
      good
      And on BMO-T they carry "Bumblebees" at the present time, only on herwhere it stands in service.
      The best modular side protection is also put on it ... an almost finished TBTR with loading of the landing force "a la" BMP-3.

      Photo: TOS-1 on BMO-T.
      1. +6
        April 24 2014 14: 58
        Quote: Aleks tv
        They also put on it the best modular side protection ...


        This protection is just pretty.
        I would not be surprised if chemists put it on Pinocchio.
        Protection in the foreground after ... the Czech Republic.
        Well done.
        Not like ours, the tankers ... eheh.

        Photo: BMO-T in Yekaterinburg.
  14. +5
    April 24 2014 14: 51
    Quote: 290980
    Quote: Buran
    Which ones? It is possible in more detail. Especially about Western developments in terms of heavy flamethrower systems. Also, do not tell me which more or less significant systems of volley fire. If the troll is somehow more detailed.

    The tactics of modern combat have changed, there will not be classic battles as in the 19th century, the crowd against the crowd, and therefore the MLRS have outlived themselves as a type of weaponry.

    Why are you talking nonsense, how is this fatal destruction in vast areas obsolete ???
    Only in computers where you are fighting, the main defeat is carried out by small arms, and in REAL war, 60-80 percent is a mine-explosive and fragmentation defeat.
  15. 0
    April 24 2014 14: 53
    Here on Wikipedia is very informative ..
    http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%91%D1%83%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%BE_(%
    D0%BE%D1%80%D1%83%D0%B6%D0%B8%D0%B5)
  16. +5
    April 24 2014 14: 55
    About "Buratino" there was an article in Popular Mechanics under the cool title "Buratino lights up. Barabas's worst nightmare." I smiled, I remember. lol
  17. +4
    April 24 2014 15: 01
    Yes!!! This is not a Molotov cocktail, this is more serious ... wassat
  18. +2
    April 24 2014 16: 28
    It is necessary to show ... am in Kiev. Let the ardor diminish, otherwise it will be bad and Uncle Sam will not save.
  19. +2
    April 24 2014 16: 46
    Not "Buratino", but "Solntsepek"!
    1. +1
      April 24 2014 20: 08
      Quote: Dezot
      Not "Buratino", but "Solntsepek"!

      Denis:
      TOS-1 Pinocchio.
      TOS-1A Sunshine.

      One and the same crap, only Buratina has a "bow" on one side, and Solntsepёk - on the other.
      wink
      The difference in the number of guides, in b / p, TZM.
      Both those and those in service.
  20. 0
    April 24 2014 17: 06
    Quote: serega.fedotov
    And by the way padskazhika please 290980

    That is not, this is a serial number in the "fifth" column, and maybe a salary in silver pieces! soldier
  21. 0
    April 25 2014 01: 19
    Quote: 290980
    The tactics of modern combat have changed, there will not be classic battles as in the 19th century, the crowd against the crowd, and therefore the MLRS have outlived themselves as a type of weaponry.

    the author is burning, you are the two amers in Iraq, Afghanistan, tell us about your vision of modern clashes.