Military Review

Churkin: UN vote is Russia's moral victory

125
Before the vote in the UN General Assembly on the resolution on Ukraine, the country was subjected to enormous pressure from the West, but the results of the vote prove the groundlessness of statements about Russia's international isolation, said Russia's permanent representative to the UN, Vitaly Churkin.


Churkin: UN vote is Russia's moral victory


“Very many countries complained that they are under tremendous pressure from the Western powers in order for them to vote in support of this resolution,” he said, ITAR-TASS reports.

“The result is quite good for us, we won a moral and political victory. Of course, there can already be no talk of isolating Russia in this situation, ”he noted.

Churkin had previously stated at a meeting of the organization that Moscow opposes the draft resolution of the General Assembly. And Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Gennady Gatilov regarded the resolution as anti-Russian, as an attempt to distort the essence of the Ukrainian events, reports vz.ru.

The UN General Assembly adopted a resolution on the territorial integrity of Ukraine. The resolution, in particular, states that the referendum held in the republic has no legal force and cannot be the basis for changing the status of the Crimea and Sevastopol.
Originator:
http://ria56.ru/posts/543457547354.htm
125 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. The comment was deleted.
  2. Samaritan
    Samaritan 28 March 2014 06: 18
    +72
    Vitaly Ivanovich, strength and patience! The Cold War is in full swing ...
    1. Civil
      Civil 28 March 2014 06: 32
      +19
      Technically, the United States pushed the UN
      1. dimdimich71
        dimdimich71 28 March 2014 06: 37
        +9
        Bent down, yes they are no stranger to pi ...
        1. polite people
          polite people 28 March 2014 09: 09
          +8
          Everything. The end of the UN. Quickly.
        2. Alekseev
          Alekseev 28 March 2014 09: 26
          +2
          Quote: dimdimich71
          Bent down, yes they are no stranger to pi ...

          Well, that many UN member states are afraid of the US is far from news.
          But ... 11-against, 24-abstained (i.e. they do not know exactly, legally or illegally, and 58-did not vote at all, i.e. there is nothing to do crap yes )
          in general, the voting results, given the influence of s in the world, are rather positive.
      2. Retribution
        Retribution 28 March 2014 07: 56
        +8
        The UN is a pocket organization created at the time by the United States to justify the emergence of the State of Israel in Palestine ... so, for general development
    2. domokl
      domokl 28 March 2014 06: 35
      +29
      Something interesting is planned ... Germany voted against fellow What is Abama insisting on in Europe?
      1. W1950
        W1950 28 March 2014 06: 39
        +22
        Voting is advisory in nature, so it is a side to us.
        1. avg
          avg 28 March 2014 11: 08
          +1
          Quote: W1950
          Voting is advisory in nature, so it is a side to us.

          While many of those who voted "for", were habitually intimidated, but those who abstained had already decided to show "a fig in a pocket" to mattresses.
          I agree with Churkin that this is our victory, and with each such victory, the voting score will change in our favor.
      2. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 28 March 2014 06: 54
        +6
        Quote: domokl
        Something interesting is planned ... Germany voted against

        Sanya hello! What makes you think that Germany is against it, together with the United States for.
        1. atalef
          atalef 28 March 2014 07: 37
          +1
          [quote = Alexander Romanov]
          Hi San, how are you?
          With this work, I missed so much interesting wassat
          1. Alexander Romanov
            Alexander Romanov 28 March 2014 07: 43
            +4
            Quote: atalef
            With this work, miss so much interesting

            Sasha is healthy, but you didn't miss it, the most interesting is yet to come. wink
            Quote: atalef
            Greetings to Alexander and Alexander

            Hello, Sergey! Domokl is also Alexander laughing
          2. dmitrij.blyuz
            dmitrij.blyuz 28 March 2014 07: 50
            +2
            They managed to minus me on another thread on this topic.
      3. Canep
        Canep 28 March 2014 07: 17
        +1
        Greetings to Alexander and Alexander! hi
        Quote: domokl
        ..Germany voted against
        Where did you get this look carefully:
        3rd column 5th row
        1. atalef
          atalef 28 March 2014 07: 35
          0
          Quote: Canep
          Greetings to Alexander and Alexander! hi
          Quote: domokl
          ..Germany voted against
          Where did you get this look carefully:
          3rd column 5th row

          Against - in the sense - for the UN resolution against the annexation of Crimea. The question is not correct
    3. Babon
      Babon 28 March 2014 07: 39
      +1
      Everything on Euronews is already showing with a bias to the side, well, there was a referendum, well, Crimea went to Russia. But we will not let Russia go further! In order not to surprise people at once, they explain that we are NATO! Who do you want to break teeth! In general, they are slowly preparing the ground.
      They say no Odessa and Transnistria of Russia. And the Baltic states will certainly be protected.
      1. Angry reader
        Angry reader 28 March 2014 08: 00
        +3
        Uh-huh ...) tyaf-tyaf reminds
        1. Babon
          Babon 28 March 2014 08: 06
          +1
          Immediately they cannot give back what kind of agitation they had against Russia and the referendum, then there will be window dressing, until people forget about the word Crimea at all, gradually so))) Looks like they decided to bargain with us so that Russia does not put much pressure on economically, Yaytsenyuk now I have to push through the Rada.
          1. Angry reader
            Angry reader 28 March 2014 08: 15
            +2
            They can't, but already ... Merkel opposed the sanctions, the British gas workers, with their statement on the direct purchase of gas, politely sent Cameron to Elizabeth's grandmother (an epidemic of direct courtesy), the French-mainlines do not count !!, well ... bombardier ... so it is for the best)
            1. Babon
              Babon 28 March 2014 08: 39
              +2
              That's how I mean, just a few days ago, they thought that in all seriousness Russia would leave the Crimea and threatened with sanctions. Lavrov said, he got tired of asking, changed his mind to stay in Crimea? And now they do not even think about it, the meaning of the sanctions, if they agreed that Crimea is Russian? So they give a neat back, well, so that the ratings do not fall))
      2. mirag2
        mirag2 28 March 2014 08: 50
        0
        Well, I don’t know, but what about “100 countries on their part, 58 abstained, but only 11 supported us”?
        1. Alex
          Alex 28 March 2014 09: 08
          +1
          24 more did not vote (100 3a, 11 against, 58 abstained, in total 169, and 193 on the list)
    4. Coffee_time
      Coffee_time 28 March 2014 08: 17
      +6
      I sincerely want to thank those countries that voted for, for the fact that they found the strength to say no to the West and give a political rebuff! Thank you, we believe in you.
    5. The comment was deleted.
      1. I do not care
        I do not care 28 March 2014 09: 05
        +1
        who does not know - film blue copybook 1963 of the year
  3. Riperbahn
    Riperbahn 28 March 2014 06: 19
    +5
    What kind of isolation is there? Whoever tries to isolate us - we ourselves isolate from the world community :) Respect to Churkin!
    1. Samaritan
      Samaritan 28 March 2014 06: 27
      +10
      well, if the USA, Canada and all the EEC countries are counted as one country,
      since they are all occupied by one US country, the score is not in favor of the Yankees.
      ...... Occupied against the Free World!
    2. domokl
      domokl 28 March 2014 06: 40
      +18
      Quote: Riperbahn
      What kind of isolation is there? TO

      This decision doesn’t say anything to anyone ... We just sat down, talked and broke up ... But yesterday’s speech of Putin to the members of the Federation Council is really serious. I mean the creation of the Russian payment system ... This blow is really strong.
      And this will cause a serious reaction from the United States. A very serious one ... The decision is not about Ukraine (most Americans don’t know where it is). The decision is about the United States. Taking a huge amount of money out of circulation will hit the economy very hard.
      We look forward to today's statement by Abama ...
      1. Salamander
        Salamander 28 March 2014 08: 35
        +1
        Quote: domokl
        But yesterday Putin's speech to the members of the Federation Council is really serious. I mean the creation of the Russian payment system ... This blow is really strong.
        And this will cause a serious reaction from the United States, very serious ...


        The creation of a national payment system is a question of more than one year, and it is a little annoying that the Russian card is planned to be issued on the basis of a universal electronic card. There are not so many people who want to get this card so far, so this step is a kind of incentive to acquire it ....
      2. Polevik
        Polevik 28 March 2014 10: 05
        0
        Quote: domokl
        creation of a Russian payment system

    3. GRune
      GRune 28 March 2014 07: 26
      +13
      They don't have enough tape to isolate us!
  4. Name
    Name 28 March 2014 06: 19
    +7
    Yes, and h.r.e. with this resolution, and with the corrupt UN, OSCE ... winked
    1. Samaritan
      Samaritan 28 March 2014 06: 25
      +1
      Officially, the resolution is advisory ... So in any case, do not care ...
      1. alexng
        alexng 28 March 2014 06: 39
        +3
        And howl, howl! World blathers and re-singers emanate their bile due to the fact that there is nothing to squeeze Russia for its independent policy. Hota, Russia can simply play away with the United States by abandoning the petroleum-dollar binding agreement and offer all its customers to pay with whatever they want, but besides the dollar, the hypocrites will immediately come to fruition.
    2. vadson
      vadson 28 March 2014 06: 58
      +1
      Quote: name
      Yes, and h.r.e. with this resolution, and with the corrupt UN, OSCE ... winked

      Greetings, I have a sidekick, he likes to repeat one saying: yes, even if an angry dog ​​is eating her and not an eagle like me))))
  5. mamont5
    mamont5 28 March 2014 06: 19
    +7
    Vitaly Churkin - brilliant as always! Shame on American women ... deputy!
    1. Coffee_time
      Coffee_time 28 March 2014 08: 23
      +7
      This is the essence of the present
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. The comment was deleted.
  6. kwazarik
    kwazarik 28 March 2014 06: 20
    +19
    Frozen Europe
    And do not “swing” your rights!
    You are with RUSSIA - just w *
    And you think that the head.
  7. Ilja 22
    Ilja 22 28 March 2014 06: 21
    +8
    We are going the right way, Comrades, we put on the UN and their resolutions, no matter how the Americans push, nothing else will come out of the water like a bubble that pops up from under the water
  8. ambiorix
    ambiorix 28 March 2014 06: 21
    +7
    It is very funny when Americans and Europeans scream about "world isolation and condemnation of Russia."
    India + China = already 2/5 of the world's population.
    In general, it is necessary to organize a powerful anti-West Atlantic coalition under the leadership of Russia.
    1. Name
      Name 28 March 2014 06: 30
      +6
      BRICS - this is enough for now, just spend payments bypassing the dollar. hi
  9. user1212
    user1212 28 March 2014 06: 27
    +3
    Can close space for them for 10 years? The Americans will not make their missile faster
    1. Name
      Name 28 March 2014 07: 45
      0
      Quote: user1212
      Can close the space of years on 10 for them?

      So after all, requests have already been received: America asks Russia not to close her space
      see http://www.politonline.ru/rssArticle/20966664.html So America can and:
      1. tolancop
        tolancop 28 March 2014 10: 12
        +1
        And I would close. America has banned the sale of dual-use goods, and Russia should cover space for the West ... Space is also a dual-use thing. They promise 70 million for each launch of Soyuz in the interests of the United States. But I think that it is in the interests of the United States, not in the interests of the Russian Federation. Energomash (and its subcontractors) may have a tough time due to the reduction in production volumes, but nothing to lose - nothing to have.
  10. DAYMAN
    DAYMAN 28 March 2014 06: 37
    +12
    I like our Foreign Ministry lately ... Churkin and Lavrov are professionals. good
  11. KOH
    KOH 28 March 2014 06: 39
    +4
    We close space, we shut off all pipes and raw materials, and we are engaged in purely our own economy, for now for 90 days ... bully
    1. user1212
      user1212 29 March 2014 06: 54
      0
      Do you want to bring them to a heart attack? laughing This is the genocide of the European population lol
  12. Quantum
    Quantum 28 March 2014 06: 40
    +9
    Umora! Does the UN give us a recommendation to leave Crimea?
    admitted that their spy satellites did not confirm the entry of Russian
    troops in the Crimea. That is, they missed the education of polite guys and further
    scenario of development of events. Now, puzzle over the problem
    an increase in the number of spy satellites. I wonder what will happen when
    will this happen in the south-east of Ukraine?
    1. serzhserzh86
      serzhserzh86 28 March 2014 08: 27
      +1
      But how will they increase the number of satellites, if Russia suddenly decides to "close" space for the pseudo satellites ??? winked
  13. sigizmund472
    sigizmund472 28 March 2014 06: 40
    +14
    USA bent the UN ??? Can not be! You cannot bend something that has long been bent and there is no place to bend further.
  14. Oml
    Oml 28 March 2014 06: 40
    +5
    Well done Ch. In his place.
  15. Lk17619
    Lk17619 28 March 2014 06: 41
    +5
    Resolution on Russia ... Non-recognition of the results of the referendum in Crimea .... Well, they completely lost their scent. If Crimea is not recognized, then at least the issue of a referendum in Kosovo should be raised and how they will react.
  16. San_aa
    San_aa 28 March 2014 06: 43
    +2
    The UN is no longer an international organization, but a pocket organ of the United States. Russia needs a policy of internal development based on the domestic market.
  17. Keeper
    Keeper 28 March 2014 06: 43
    +2
    YES, our ambassadors and representatives are now on the front flank!
    But to win, you need to make Russia perceived as a humane country, not seeking to bend anyone! And accordingly, in this light, to expose the United States as it is - arrogant and aggressive ...
  18. kondor-espada
    kondor-espada 28 March 2014 06: 44
    +2
    The West began to fear us. This is clear ! Crimea is now ours, but what about the Russian-speaking population in the south, southeast, they are being pressed there, in the Donbass workers began to be fired from enterprises for pro-Russian sentiments, and for speaking at rallies. Let's see what will happen this weekend, whether there will be demonstrations, rallies, whether the people will be able to unite against the Kiev fascist lawlessness - in general. I don't know what we are waiting for, what Russia is waiting for, but we obviously don't need blood!
  19. Kulneff2009
    Kulneff2009 28 March 2014 06: 45
    +3
    Quote: ambiorix
    In general, it is necessary to organize a powerful anti-West Atlantic coalition under the leadership of Russia.

    I completely agree with this! And Churkin-Clever !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  20. Veter
    Veter 28 March 2014 06: 45
    +3
    Churkin is a man !!! One has only to guess how hard it is for him there, amid the rot of UNO. Obamka has already turned gray.
    1. KOH
      KOH 28 March 2014 07: 40
      +4


      The stump is clear, they threaten, hysterical, spit, wave their hands. Well, it's not a mental hospital ... wassat
      1. Veter
        Veter 28 March 2014 08: 05
        +1
        Quote: CON
        Well, it's not a mental hospital ...

        Churkin-Chief Physician wink
        1. KOH
          KOH 28 March 2014 10: 34
          0
          obama, where is the prosecutor? Churkin at Lavrov's, in which ward do we have the prosecutor? ... laughing
  21. kind
    kind 28 March 2014 06: 47
    +3
    The UN has long become a prostitute in the United States, and in what demand is a prostitute, she is also a venal. request
  22. major071
    major071 28 March 2014 06: 50
    +12
    I already wrote and I will repeat it again: Churkin and Lavrov, and indeed the whole Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russia must be given milk for harmfulness! laughing Well, how many nerves do you need to have to talk with stupid Americans and their singers? what
    And as for the resolution: the paper on which it was printed is more expensive than these UN statements.
  23. asv96
    asv96 28 March 2014 06: 52
    +1
    Quote: kondor-espada
    The West began to fear us. This is clear ! Crimea is now ours, but what about the Russian-speaking population in the south, southeast, they are being pressed there, in the Donbass workers began to be fired from enterprises for pro-Russian sentiments, and for speaking at rallies. Let's see what will happen this weekend, whether there will be demonstrations, rallies, whether the people will be able to unite against the Kiev fascist lawlessness - in general. I don't know what we are waiting for, what Russia is waiting for, but we obviously don't need blood!

    Let working hands come to us as never before
  24. Flinky
    Flinky 28 March 2014 06: 53
    +3
    Just a rag once again wiped the owner's dirty ass.
    Strictly do not care.
  25. VNP1958PVN
    VNP1958PVN 28 March 2014 06: 53
    +2
    But what about people's democracy? Or is the UN only the village of kratia held in high esteem?
    1. Wedmak
      Wedmak 28 March 2014 07: 40
      +2
      The UN and democracy are antonyms in general.
  26. ya.seliwerstov2013
    ya.seliwerstov2013 28 March 2014 06: 54
    +6
    Russia has always been rich in talents. Churkin is just a diplomacy guru and an example of restraint. Respect and respect !!!
  27. Bigriver
    Bigriver 28 March 2014 06: 54
    +4
    Good dynamics in our favor!
    Oh, damn it, how much headache and stress we bring to "Hegemon".
    She-she, their head will burst. They are used to having the whole World in their pocket.
    They don't understand, fools, that the more you try to bend us, the stronger we become.
  28. Sars
    Sars 28 March 2014 06: 56
    +7
    Zhirinovsky must be released to the UN site, let him tell the whole truth about the Westerners, and fight with the women of the State Department!
    1. Riperbahn
      Riperbahn 28 March 2014 07: 36
      +1
      First they will fight in the UN, and then in a more intimate atmosphere :))) Maybe they will stop hysteria then?
  29. furious
    furious 28 March 2014 07: 01
    +4
    the vote showed that the world was divided into 2 parts: into the "countries of the USA" and into the countries that are tired of the USA!
  30. Michael KG
    Michael KG 28 March 2014 07: 05
    +2
    Quote: SarS
    Zhirinovsky must be released to the UN site, let him tell the whole truth about the Westerners, and fight with the women of the State Department!


    Then this day will be the end of Russian diplomacy.
    1. Humpty
      Humpty 28 March 2014 07: 16
      +2
      Quote: Michael KG

      Then this day will be the end of Russian diplomacy.


      This will not be the end of Russian diplomacy. When Zhirik was in PACE, he trolled this whole pack of hard things, they had nothing to argue with.
  31. Humpty
    Humpty 28 March 2014 07: 12
    +7
    The result of the vote also showed how much the United States has a chain mongrel. But the mongrel only while on the chain, feels its importance. And I admire Cuba, they live half starving sideways with the Americans but they blow it.
  32. Wedmak
    Wedmak 28 March 2014 07: 13
    +6
    I don't quite understand what kind of victory we are talking about. The resolution was adopted. In a couple of weeks, no one will care who was there for, who was against. And the very fact of the adoption of this resolution will be presented by the United States as a victory of democracy over totalitarian Russia. And used in every possible way to our detriment.
    And respect Churkin, I can't imagine what nerves you need to have to butt with a hundred singing along with the United States. In general, Lavrov should be given the order, as the main one in the showdown with the United States.
  33. ken
    ken 28 March 2014 07: 18
    +18
    Great diplomat !!! Every day, as on the front line !!!!!
    1. nezabor
      nezabor 28 March 2014 07: 41
      +3
      There is still a clever laurel for 10 years already satisfied with dizziness on the penis for the West
    2. GRune
      GRune 28 March 2014 09: 44
      0
      Under these texts there is a lack of a photo of Lavrov and even Rogozin, probably, the one when NATO was the same annealed not weakly.
    3. Polevik
      Polevik 28 March 2014 10: 13
      +1
      No man is an island!


      He is not alone. He speaks for ALL of us.
  34. parus2nik
    parus2nik 28 March 2014 07: 22
    +3
    It's just the US and NATO is the UN, the UN is the US and NATO .. ​​and all this crap, how many resolutions, for example, the Assembly adopted in relation to Israel and what ..?
  35. Oleg Ivanovich
    Oleg Ivanovich 28 March 2014 07: 22
    +3
    Conduct a referendum in Cuba to join Russia.
    1. Polevik
      Polevik 28 March 2014 10: 17
      0
      By the way, yes! The Federal Republic of Cuba or the Cuban Autonomous Region. With a special status. soldier
  36. sv68
    sv68 28 March 2014 07: 25
    +4
    comrade Churkin just think that you are in the zoo and you will have more fun
    1. Riperbahn
      Riperbahn 28 March 2014 07: 37
      +2
      The pigsty is not a zoo!
    2. mvg64
      mvg64 28 March 2014 07: 38
      +4
      support! laughing
    3. The comment was deleted.
  37. johan
    johan 28 March 2014 08: 05
    +1
    One hundred states in favor, 11 against. Moral victory ...
    1. Polevik
      Polevik 28 March 2014 10: 22
      0
      Quote: Johan
      One hundred states in favor, 11 against. Moral victory ...


      You did not understand anything. With all the US pressure, only half are in favor. The rest were against, abstained, evaded. Here it is - Victory! Let it be moral. For now. wink
  38. zzzeka
    zzzeka 28 March 2014 08: 09
    +2
    The UN is an obsolete and rotten office. UN = "League of Nations" before World War II.
  39. The comment was deleted.
  40. The comment was deleted.
  41. zzzeka
    zzzeka 28 March 2014 08: 13
    +1
    By the way: the United States has been ignoring UN resolutions on sanctions against Cuba for more than 20 years. The question is where is the result, what such processes in international law does this office affect?
  42. Ural guys
    Ural guys 28 March 2014 08: 24
    +3
    Notice in the background where the US unit in Iraq is photographed against the backdrop of the American flag. Below is the flag of the SS forces! And how is this to be understood ?!
    1. operator35
      operator35 28 March 2014 09: 54
      0
      Quote: Ural guys
      Notice in the background where the US unit in Iraq is photographed against the backdrop of the American flag. Below is the flag of the SS forces! And how is this to be understood ?!

      and this is the flag of the sniper unit - "Scout Snipers". no kidding, when I first saw it, I was stunned !!
  43. Professor
    Professor 28 March 2014 08: 36
    -8
    Before the vote in the UN General Assembly on the resolution on Ukraine, the country was subjected to enormous pressure from the West, but the results of the vote prove the groundlessness of statements about Russia's international isolation, said Russia's permanent representative to the UN, Vitaly Churkin.

    Well done Churkin, he's lying and won't blink an eye.
    100 countries against Russia,
    According
    Armenia,
    Belarus,
    Bolivia,
    Cuba,
    North Korea,
    Nicaragua,
    Sudan,
    Syria,
    Venezuela,
    Zimbabwe.
    Full support of the international community because Zimbabwe is "for" wassat
    1. From Germany
      From Germany 28 March 2014 08: 57
      +2
      The qualified majority was never won, in my opinion there is more talk about "isolation". And what isolation, if almost 50% of countries have not condemned Russia, the result of the vote:
      100 - for
      11 - against
      58 - abstained
      24 - did not participate in the voting

      By the way, why was Israel afraid to vote? At least they abstained, otherwise they set up their older American brother, did not support him in difficult times.
      1. Professor
        Professor 28 March 2014 08: 59
        -2
        Quote: From Germany
        By the way, why was Israel afraid to vote? At least they abstained, otherwise they set up their older American brother, did not support him in difficult times.

        The Israeli Foreign Ministry is on strike demanding better working conditions. The embassies are closed, the UN has not come to work. So it would be 101 for.
        1. From Germany
          From Germany 28 March 2014 09: 08
          0
          History and subjunctives ... - I think you are familiar with this expression. Nevertheless, almost half of the world's countries did not condemn Russia's actions, despite US pressure. Excellent result! And where do you think Churkin lied?
          1. Professor
            Professor 28 March 2014 09: 16
            -6
            Quote: From Germany
            And where do you think Churkin lied?

            100 versus 11. Let me think, drive into Jamp, count the significance ... wassat But on the other hand, Zimbabwe alone is worth 10 Germaniums, so Churkin may be right. A great victory for Russian diplomacy. laughing
            1. From Germany
              From Germany 28 March 2014 09: 22
              +2
              11 against, 58 abstained, 24 did not vote.

              So 100 for and 93 against, or they don't care. Question: what kind of isolation can we talk about? The UN vote proved the falsity of the US statements about "isolation of Russia", which Churkin quite rightly comments: "The result is quite good for us, we have won a moral and political victory."

              I repeat my question, where do you think Churkin lied?
              1. Professor
                Professor 28 March 2014 09: 28
                -5
                Quote: From Germany
                I repeat my question, where do you think Churkin lied?

                Churkin would be right if 100 voted against, and 11. And so isolation is obvious. List of countries voted for listing? Their total GDP, etc.?

                Quote: From Germany
                "The result is quite good for us, we have won a moral and political victory."

                He would have said the same if only Zimbabwe had voted against. Well, okay, a couple of such "victories" and there will be two steps left to the food cards. sad
                1. From Germany
                  From Germany 28 March 2014 09: 40
                  +2
                  That is, 93 countries, in particular such a powerful one as China and even such a small one as Israel, did not support the United States. Half of the countries and more than half of the population (thanks to China) of the earth either support Russia or they don't care. Isolation of Russia is nonsense, the UN vote is direct proof of this.

                  Figures and facts are stubborn things, but they show only one thing - Russia is supported (or in any case has nothing against) almost half of the countries of the world.
                  1. Professor
                    Professor 28 March 2014 10: 47
                    -1
                    Quote: From Germany
                    That is, 93 countries, in particular such a powerful one as China and even such a small one as Israel, did not support the United States.

                    For those who are in the tank I repeat for the last time: the Israeli Foreign Ministry is on strike.

                    Quote: From Germany
                    Figures and facts are stubborn things, but they show only one thing - Russia is supported (or in any case has nothing against) almost half of the countries of the world.
                    And now the numbers. 100 countries condemned Russia, 11 interceded, and the rest did not even take the side of Russia. Great victory for Russian diplomacy, Cuba is on the side of Russia. Hurray comrades !!! Churkin Hero's Star. Out of 198 countries, 100 actively condemned Russia - Victory of Russian diplomacy. I'll go smoke bamboo, maybe, like the rest, the brains will dry out, otherwise I can't see the victory.
                    1. From Germany
                      From Germany 28 March 2014 11: 07
                      +1
                      Okay, let’s leave Israel, even if there is a strike, even a general diarrhea. And now again for those who are especially dull:

                      Given: 100 countries against Russia's actions
                      93 countries either for Russia's actions or they don't care what Russia does

                      Question: When is a country considered isolated?

                      Answer: When the overwhelming majority do not want / do not have any business with a given country.

                      Fact 1: 93 countries (well, let it be 92, since Israel, as luck would have it, amers force majeure) will continue to do business with Russia (both economic and diplomatic).
                      Fact 2: You should be aware that many of the 100 countries that are against Russia's actions and will continue to trade with it, no one has recalled their diplomats from Moscow.

                      There is no insulation, it doesn't even smell close. Only 100 out of 193 (you gave the figure 198) condemned the actions of Russia, and this is just over 50%.

                      We can continue to pour from empty to empty, but this will not change these facts in any way.
                      1. Professor
                        Professor 28 March 2014 11: 24
                        0
                        Quote: From Germany
                        Answer: When the overwhelming majority do not want / do not have any business with a given country.

                        100 out of 198 are not the majority. I'm going to kill myself against the wall. wassat

                        Quote: From Germany
                        We can continue to pour from empty to empty, but this will not change these facts in any way.

                        Fact: 100 against 11, the rest aside. Victory.Uraaaaaaa.

                        Quote: From Germany
                        You should know that many of the 100 countries that will continue to trade with Russia against Russia's actions, no one has recalled their diplomats from Moscow.

                        He did not recall diplomats, did not declare war ... Victory.
                        I remember how Putin complained that America is not canceling the Vinnik Johnson amendments. She really bothered him. From what? In order to understand who will trade and who will not and what the consequences may be, take an interest in the incident with Mitutoyo.
                      2. dmitrij.blyuz
                        dmitrij.blyuz 28 March 2014 11: 52
                        0
                        Oleg! Don't go against the wall! Better about the ottoman! Not so expensive. Your comments often make you think. So, we are waiting for ideas for logical thinking. hi
                      3. Professor
                        Professor 28 March 2014 20: 52
                        0
                        Quote: dmitrij.blyuz
                        Don't go against the wall
                        The wall received a concussion. fellow

                        Quote: saturn.mmm
                        I'm wondering how the American Congress, at the end of the year, will increase the national debt by two trillion

                        And at least 10 trillion. While their green papers are quoted all over the world, not rubles or yuan. And the economy there is not worth exporting hydrocarbons, but in real production. I myself worked there and I know what I'm talking about.

                        Quote: saturn.mmm
                        Your opinion is very interesting, how will this whole situation in Ukraine end up?

                        answer in PM
                      4. Demon0n
                        Demon0n 29 March 2014 01: 10
                        0
                        Professor
                        Is everything all right with logic?
                        1) The state represented by the authorities (hereinafter, simply "state") makes a decision "to break off economic and other relations with state N" (hereinafter, the decision "on isolation"). What are the possible solutions? ...: "Isolate" or "Not Isolate". Do you agree?
                        2) There is a vote with the wording: "Isolate". Do you agree?
                        3) Those who voted "FOR" agree to isolate. Do you agree?
                        4) Those who voted "AGAINST" do not agree to isolate. Do you agree?
                        5) Those who did not vote or abstained, do not agree to isolate (unless there are force majeure circumstances that prevented the vote). Do you agree?
                        It is a simple dual / binary logical chain. So the question was posed.
                      5. The comment was deleted.
                      6. user1212
                        user1212 29 March 2014 07: 46
                        0
                        Quote: Professor
                        And the economy there is not worth exporting hydrocarbons, but in real production.

                        Can you give more details? Are you an economist? Can you name the exact percentage of the "financial sector" in the US economy?
              2. user1212
                user1212 29 March 2014 07: 12
                0
                The glass is half empty or half full. 100 countries supported the resolution against Russia, 98 did not support the resolution against Russia. These 98 do not need to vote AGAINST, they just need not vote FOR. The resolution was passed against Russia, half did not support this resolution. As if our Foreign Ministry thinks so. Although there is no effect from this vote. Even if all countries voted against Russia, it would not change anything. Well, so what? Will we feel ashamed? It will be a tragedy laughing

                In fact, the independence of the state does not depend on recognition or non-recognition sixes usa the world community. It depends on the state, which can defend this independence (by force or diplomacy)

                What food cards did you talk about? Overheated in the promised sun?

                And tie with bamboo. wink
          2. saturn.mmm
            saturn.mmm 28 March 2014 12: 08
            0
            Quote: Professor
            Well, okay, a couple of such "victories" and there will be two steps left to the food cards.

            Why two steps, not one or three.
            I'm wondering how the American Congress, at the end of the year, will increase the national debt by two trillion.
            Your opinion is very interesting, how will this whole situation in Ukraine end up?
      2. The comment was deleted.
  44. The comment was deleted.
  45. Alexander Romanov
    Alexander Romanov 28 March 2014 09: 37
    +4
    Quote: Professor
    ... So it would be 101 for.

    Don't tell the professor, you know perfectly well that Israel said, it's none of our business. And those 58 who abstained were also not standing on the sidelines. Hi Obama, tell me and think for what they don't like you so much on the website wink
    1. From Germany
      From Germany 28 March 2014 09: 46
      +1
      And let it turn, it is already moving to GDP, laughing it off at the expense of Zimbabwe. It is clear that in fact he has nothing to say, he starts to play up.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. Professor
      Professor 28 March 2014 10: 40
      -4
      Quote: Alexander Romanov
      Don't tell the professor, you know perfectly well what Israel said is none of our business.

      Israeli Foreign Ministry: everyone is on strike
      Don't fantasize. The Israeli Foreign Ministry is on strike.

      Hello Obama, give it and think about why they don't like you so much on the website

      Only a urapatriot and a complete idiot can represent 100 "for" and 11 "against" as a diplomatic victory.
      1. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 28 March 2014 11: 42
        +1
        Quote: Professor
        Israeli Foreign Ministry: everyone is on strike
        Don't fantasize. The Israeli Foreign Ministry is on strike.

        And why, Israel didn’t talk about non-nitrality on this issue? How many times has the UN condemned you that you are not isolated, can you give a damn? Probably yes, just like us hi
        Quote: Professor
        Only a urapatriot and a complete idiot can represent 100 "for" and 11 "against" as a diplomatic victory.

        Yes, it’s not for those who voted against, but for those who did not support the United States and abstained, and count such half of the world by population. And it’s difficult to call Churkin an idiot. So don’t write nonsense professor, sometimes you know that you’re playing, but keep doing it, why? Although it's not very interesting to me. It's hard to imagine a bigger idiot than Obama, and the fact that 100 rams go to the butt of one main ram is idiocy. Therefore, I can personally congratulate you, Israel was not included in the number of the bad hundred laughing
        1. Professor
          Professor 28 March 2014 12: 16
          0
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          And why, Israel didn’t talk about non-nitrality on this issue?

          Let's link

          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          Yes, it’s not for those who voted against, but for those who did not support the United States and abstained, and such half of the world count by population.

          Let's see and count those who supported Russia:
          Armenia,
          Belarus,
          Bolivia,
          Cuba,
          North Korea,
          Nicaragua,
          Sudan,
          Syria,
          Venezuela,
          Zimbabwe.
          Where are your closest friends in the CSTO? Where is Iran? Where is China? They don't talk about Russia, but they beat them with the whole crowd, and they peacefully observe from the sidelines? Victory, Russian diplomacy.
          1. Alexander Romanov
            Alexander Romanov 28 March 2014 12: 21
            +1
            Quote: Professor
            Let's link

            Atalef Sanya didn’t lend it to me, ask him. "Do not get into this mess"
            Signing
            Israel takes a neutral position on the issue of Crimea
            Earlier, Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman spoke about the situation in Crimea. Speaking last week on the "Hero of the Day" program on Israel's Ninth TV Channel, Lieberman noted that he believes it is right to contact both sides.
            "For us, the correct conclusion is not to get into this mess - where we are not asked to. We have very good relations with the Russian side, with the Americans, and we also maintain contacts with the Ukrainian leadership," Lieberman said.
            http://www.bbc.co.uk/russian/international/2014/03/140318_ukraine_crimea_israel_
            reaction.shtml
            Quote: Professor

            Let's see and count those who supported Russia:

            Did they support the United States?
          2. The comment was deleted.
  • Gvozdovsky
    Gvozdovsky 28 March 2014 10: 06
    0
    Professor, what kind of sadness do you have? Your Israel has been in a similar situation more than once! So what? It is not noticeable that Israel liberated the occupied territories. wink
    The dog barks, the caravan is coming! laughing
    1. zaazua
      zaazua 28 March 2014 19: 57
      0
      http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9E%D0%BA%D0%BA%D1%83%D0%BF%D0%B8%D1%80%D0%BE%D0
      %B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8B%D0%B5_%D1%82%D0%B5%D1%80%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%
      80%D0%B8%D0%B8
  • The comment was deleted.
  • Polevik
    Polevik 28 March 2014 10: 28
    +2
    Quote: Professor
    Well done Churkin, he's lying and won't blink an eye.


    Already posted but I will repeat.

    You did not understand anything. With all the US pressure, only half are in favor. The rest were against, abstained, evaded. Here it is - Victory! Let it be moral. For now. wink


    PS Although, of course, I am not an international expert.
    1. Professor
      Professor 28 March 2014 10: 49
      -2
      Quote: Polevik
      You did not understand anything. With all the US pressure, only half are in favor. The rest were against, abstained, evaded. Here it is - Victory! Let it be moral. For now. wink
      And I will repeat myself.
      There are 11 countries on the side of Russia,
      On the US side 100.
      Question for the 5th grade. Who has won?
      The answer of the urapatriots: Russia, as there are 11 countries on its side. wassat
      1. Polevik
        Polevik 28 March 2014 11: 34
        +2
        I’m wondering - do you really understand what the moral victory is? Or are you just improving in discussions?
        And so the isolation on the face.

        And how is it manifested? Just don't talk about the G8, which includes (for example) Italy, but does not include (for example) China. The right thing is - Ridiculous!
        List of countries voted for listing? Their total GDP, etc.?

        Yeah. And what did it give them? I remembered anecdote
        for the 5th grade
        :
        A turmoil between an athlete - a "pitchman" and a "street child".
        Jock: "I'm bigger than you. Scatter. I'll strangle you."
        A street child: "Uh-huh. Try it. I'll rip out your throat, gouge out your eyes, break your fingers and talk."
        Who has won?


        PS By the way, they teach that Israel survived surrounded by a hostile Islamic world, because it behaved like that street child.
  • mamontoff1981
    mamontoff1981 28 March 2014 09: 00
    +1
    Churkin is a fine fellow, one against the whole western gopoty. God give Russia more of these men !!!!!!! hi
  • Standard Oil
    Standard Oil 28 March 2014 09: 02
    0
    I just want to ask after all these "resolutions": "Well, they voted and what's next?"
  • polite people
    polite people 28 March 2014 09: 03
    0
    COLD WAR 2.0 Already passed. Well started!
    1. Professor
      Professor 28 March 2014 09: 06
      -7
      Quote: polite people
      COLD WAR 2.0 Already passed. Well started!

      Not "passed", but "lost". Do you want it again?
      1. Gvozdovsky
        Gvozdovsky 28 March 2014 10: 09
        +1
        Professor, not lost (foolish delusion of weak minds), but stopped. laughing Feel the Difference!
        1. Standard Oil
          Standard Oil 28 March 2014 10: 32
          0
          No, the professor is right, you lost, you really need to look at the truth. Another question about the "start of a new cold war," the past, as we know, did not start, and we did not start a new "cold war" either.
          1. KOH
            KOH 28 March 2014 10: 48
            +1
            And they say the cold war never ended, so we won ... laughing
        2. Polevik
          Polevik 28 March 2014 10: 42
          0
          Quote: polite people
          COLD WAR 2.0 Already passed. Well started!


          Quote: Professor
          Not "passed", but "lost". Do you want it again?


          Quote: Gvozdovsky
          Professor, not lost (foolish delusion of weak minds), but stopped. laughing Feel the difference!


          If you believe the opinion popular in certain circles, then you are wrong. All three.
          They say (not loudly) that the Cold War never really ended. It just passed into a different form, but its essence, almost did not change.
          1. Gvozdovsky
            Gvozdovsky 28 March 2014 11: 08
            0
            I probably agree with you: geopolitics and state independence are inseparable concepts. And also eternal! And how to call the collision of geopolitical interests of different powers, this is the tenth case ("Cold" or some other).
          2. Gvozdovsky
            Gvozdovsky 28 March 2014 11: 08
            0
            I probably agree with you: geopolitics and state independence are inseparable concepts. And also eternal! And how to call the collision of geopolitical interests of different powers, this is the tenth case ("Cold" or some other).
        3. Professor
          Professor 28 March 2014 11: 15
          -1
          Quote: Gvozdovsky
          Professor, not lost (foolish delusion of weak minds), but stopped.

          Stopped by the termination of the existence of one of the warring parties and its devastation for 20 years. sad
      2. The comment was deleted.
  • Klim2011
    Klim2011 28 March 2014 09: 11
    0
    Quote: Professor
    Quote: From Germany
    By the way, why was Israel afraid to vote? At least they abstained, otherwise they set up their older American brother, did not support him in difficult times.

    The Israeli Foreign Ministry is on strike demanding better working conditions. The embassies are closed, the UN has not come to work. So it would be 101 for.

    Don't convincingly excuse yourself, to confirm loyalty to the overlord, the Israeli Foreign Ministry is obliged to make an official statement. Otherwise, no matter how.
  • Vtel
    Vtel 28 March 2014 09: 23
    +1
    It's time to give Churkin a Hero of Russia. Not everyone can work in this Jurassic zoo. May God grant him health and strength.
  • DAGESTAN333
    DAGESTAN333 28 March 2014 09: 42
    0
    Let us remember those who were not afraid of America and supported us at the same time. In the future, fewer and fewer countries will fear America, gaining more independence.

    The UN is bullshit. Sadly, the world is still ruled by the Force.
  • annodomene
    annodomene 28 March 2014 09: 44
    +3
    Vitaly Ivanovich - vivat !!! All Russia is with you. I wish you success in your hard work !!!