The ideological Internet battles around Ukraine did not begin yesterday. They have their history and its dynamics. Watching how the nonrossia homunculus grows year after year can be a very exciting sight. Not once or twice he recalled Stanislav Lem's Thirteenth Journey of Yon the Quiet. But, as a person who has been studying the phenomenon of svidomism for quite a long time, I must warn you: you should get pleasure in high rubber boots and gas masks. Sometimes there is such an amber ... Sort of intellectual diggery, you know.
Without going into unnecessary details, I will note that the ideological struggle around Ukraine went through the following stages: 1) ideological discussions; 2) ideological stamps; 3) trolling; 4) attacking whoops; 5) screech of frustration. That is, from year to year discussions on Ukrainian websites consistently reduce the intellectual component in favor of an uncontrolled release of emotions. Ask how this can be? Very simple.
Freedom fighters - pravdoruby with Galitsayschiny - fighting not with specific people, but with some kind of virtual image created by the Cunning Enemy. This is the image of the ideal enemy. And the ideal enemy is this: he is stupid, cowardly, not educated, lacking initiative, prone to suicide, wakes up and falls asleep with the name of Putin on his lips. He stole from his neighbors territory, history, industry, space, religion, science, language, writing and culture, in short - everything. He even villainously changed his genetic code from Finnish to Slavic by decree of Peter 1 in 1721. Such an insignificant and worthless enemy is doomed to defeat.
Ideologically and morally, the Treacherous Enemy has long been destroyed. The fact that we see the last 300 years is agony, and Russia itself will inevitably fall into gangster enclaves in
In short, the enemy of separatist Ukraine got obviously weak. Svidomity all say so. And what intellectual discussions can be with such an insignificant enemy? The depth of the discussions is drastically reduced by the fact that the young generation of independent “ukrovs” is entering the warpath, catastrophically losing in intelligence and erudition to their fathers, who received a totalitarian education in the USSR.
If you start reading books, then there will be no special time for skirmishes on the Internet. On the other hand, deep knowledge is not only unnecessary for quarrels, they are even harmful.
And here on the agenda come homework, brief in content, but capacious in meaning - a sort of cheat sheet on a given topic. I will not describe anything, the topic is well known to all. Experienced Internet fighters are well aware that, using a set of clichés, it is impossible in principle to lose the intellectual discussion, because in such a discussion there is no intelligence.
In those cases when certain cliches become too widespread and take possession of the masses, we can no longer talk about folk art. This is the purposeful activity of specially trained citizens in fooling the population. And this, in turn, implies a certain methodology and, accordingly, the presence of guidelines for agitators-propagandists, not sufficiently savvy to compile coherent texts.
In those cases when it is possible to dissolve such an exposer of imperialism into an abstract exchange of opinions, while using the inconvenient ideas of Ukrainians for facts from history, geography and economics, the discussion usually turns off and the common phrase goes: “Your training manual is outdated”.
After these words, the Russian Soul-Eater is considered humiliated morally and destroyed intellectually, his despicable essence is exposed, and the place of work (KGB) is revealed.
That is, an independent disputant a priori assumes that the opponent does not use his own knowledge gained over many years, but uses pre-prepared text written by Natemost himself.
I have repeatedly tried to find out what is this outstanding training manual such and where it can be seen at least one eye? And in general, what is it? Most often, in response, I receive contempt silence. And sometimes they arrogantly advise - ask your chief.
I asked my wife, but she does not know anything about the manuals.
The question is, why is the pravdorub so sure of the availability of the manuals for Russians? Isn’t it because he himself has such a training manual in his hands and doesn’t imagine that someone can give reasoned thoughts just like that, impromptu?
The words about the manuals would probably have remained a brilliant polemical trick, laying on both shoulder blades of any Russian, envious of Ukrainian freedom and democracy, but some time ago, vigilant comrades found something and presented it to the general public.
Very, very good training manual, taken from a very, very reliable source. It is absolutely universal for both Ukraine and the Russian progressive public. A good manual has only one flaw. It is not written for us, and we are unlikely to use it. But I still suggest to read. Many will easily recognize the arguments with which agents of the Forces of Good constantly operate.
Explanations on the situation in Ukraine (March 4 2014)
Statement: The opposition has violated the agreement concluded with Yanukovych 21 February.
Answer: within the framework of this agreement, the Rada adopted a law on the return of Ukraine to the Constitution of 2004. In accordance with the terms of the agreement, Yanukovych had 24 hours to sign this law, after which the protesters had to release a number of government buildings and take other steps to reduce tensions. Instead of signing, Yanukovych left Kiev and disappeared. It was Yanukovych who failed to comply with the February 21 agreement. The party of Yanukovych also went further, voting for the law to remove him from office and approving the new government.
Permanent Representative of the United States to the UN Power: "It was Yanukovych who violated the terms of this agreement, having left Kiev, and then Ukraine."
The statement: the government of Ukraine is illegitimate or does not represent the people of Ukraine.
Answer: The new government was approved by the Ukrainian parliament (Rada) 371 with votes in favor, that is, by an overwhelming majority, with the support of all political parties, with the exception of the communists. Even the Yanukovych Party of Regions voted for the new government literally in a few days after its disappearance. Although the Party of Regions is not represented in the current government, it was a political decision and it does not indicate a lack of support for government policies. In fact, almost all laws passed by parliament after Yanukovych’s departure enjoy the support of the majority of the Party of Regions.
Affirmation: Rada is under the influence of extremists or terrorists.
Answer: Rada is the most representative institution of power in Ukraine, and recent laws were passed by an overwhelming majority, including from representatives of Eastern Ukraine.
Adoption: on the streets of Kiev is dangerous.
Answer: since the security forces were allotted ten days ago and a new government was approved, calm was established in Kiev. According to the Ukrainian press and other media, there is no surge of crime, looting and settling of accounts with political opponents in the city.
The statement: in Ukraine there is a humanitarian crisis, and hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians are fleeing to Russia and seeking asylum.
Answer: we do not see any evidence of this. The best way to prevent such a crisis is to stop all provocative actions and allow observers into the region to monitor the situation and reduce tensions.
The State Border Service of Ukraine: “The migration of Ukrainians remains at about the same level as it was a week ago, two years ago, and three years ago” (http://www.unian.net/politics/892071-massovogo-vyiezda-ukraintsev-v -rossiyu-net-pogranichniki.html).
Adoption: ethnic Russian is in danger.
Answer: there are no confirmed reports that any of the ethnic Russians are threatened; there are only statements about this in the Russian press and on Russian state television. From the very beginning, the new Ukrainian government has made peace a priority and reconciliation a priority. And about. President Turchinov refused to sign a law restricting the use of the Russian language at the regional level. The United States and other countries, including those from the EU, welcomed this approach of the Ukrainian government.
US Permanent Representative to the UN Power: “There is no evidence that ethnic Russians are in danger. On the contrary, the new Ukrainian government pays priority attention to reconciliation in the country and the participation of all political forces in its life. President Turchinov - Acting President - clearly stated his rejection of any restrictions on the use of the Russian language. ”
Under Secretary Nuland: “The OSCE has the tools to resolve any legitimate concerns about local security, respect for minority rights and preparing for a democratic transition to free and fair elections.”
Zhanbolat Usenov, the official representative of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Kazakhstan: “Kazakhstan calls on all parties to abandon options that imply the use of force and to exert maximum political efforts to resolve the crisis through negotiations.”
Statement: Russian bases are under threat.
Answer: Russian military facilities were and remain safe, and the new Ukrainian authorities pledged to abide by all applicable international agreements, including those relating to Russian bases.
US Permanent Representative to the UN Power: “The main question is whether the recent change of government in Ukraine poses a danger to Russia's legitimate interests to such an extent that it justifies its military intervention, the seizure of public institutions and the deployment of military ultimatums to parts of the Ukrainian army. The answer is of course not. ”
Statement: Kiev is trying to destabilize the Crimea.
Answer: on the contrary, it was the Russian military who were withdrawn from their places of deployment in order to seize the authorities and infrastructure of the Crimea. The government of Ukraine, in contrast, acts with restraint and seeks dialogue. The authorities in Kiev immediately decided to send to the Crimea the acting head. Defense Minister to defuse the situation. Later, the deputy of the Verkhovna Rada, Petro Poroshenko, who had arrived from Kiev, was not allowed into the building of the Crimean Rada for negotiations.
The statement: there were mass attacks on churches in Eastern Ukraine.
Answer: we see no evidence of this. All religious leaders of Ukraine, including representatives of the Russian Orthodox Church, spoke in support of the new political power, calling for national unity and healing.
US Permanent Representative to the UN Power: “There is no evidence, for example, that churches in Eastern Ukraine are being or are being attacked; such charges are not substantiated. ”
Eight Ukrainian churches and religious organizations appealed for peace and against foreign aggression; their letter is posted on the website of the Institute for Religious Freedom of Ukraine: http://t.co/CF31axsK8O. In it, they "call on the Russian authorities to stop the aggression against Ukraine and immediately withdraw the Russian troops from the Ukrainian land." This letter was signed by representatives of the Ukrainian Orthodox and Catholic churches, other Christian denominations, as well as Jewish and Muslim religions.
Statement: Crimean Prime Minister called on Russia to intervene.
Answer: international law does not provide for the use of force in response to the call of regional authorities. In accordance with the Constitution of Ukraine, only the Ukrainian Rada can allow the presence of foreign troops on the territory of Ukraine. Sergei Aksenov’s appeal to President Putin to ensure “peace and tranquility” in the Crimea was a cynical gesture leading to destabilization.
Statement: Russia acts in accordance with the Treaty of Friendship between Ukraine and the Russian Federation 1997 of the year.
Answer: The 1997 Agreement of the Year requires Russia to respect the territorial integrity of Ukraine. The military actions of Russia in Ukraine are a clear violation of the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Ukraine.
Under Secretary Nuland: “We believe that Russia's actions in Ukraine are [..] a violation of its obligations undertaken in Helsinki, as well as its duties as a UN member.”
The leaders of the G-7 countries: Russia's military actions are "a violation of Russia's obligations in accordance with the UN Charter and its agreement with Ukraine on the 1997 military bases of the year."
The official representative of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the PRC, Qin Gang: “We respect the independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine” (http://russian.moscow.usembassy.gov/mobile/settingrecordstraight.html).
PS The only request. Clicking on the plus or minus, think: do you rate my article or “their” training manual?