Military Review

Dobkin took his passport and opened a criminal case on him

12
Dobkin took his passport and opened a criminal case on himMikhail Dobkin, former head of the Kharkiv Regional State Administration, lost his passport at the border control post at the Kharkiv airport. The Security Service of Ukraine opened a criminal case against the former governor.


“I think that maybe one of the ways out of the situation that they invented themselves, it was today a quick initiation of a criminal case. Please, if you have something to present, I am ready to respond. I have nothing to fear,” said Mikhail Dobkin.

The former head of the Kharkiv region regarded the withdrawal of a Ukrainian passport as a violation of his rights. “I officially declare that I am not trying to leave the country anywhere. I am in Kharkiv,” Dobkin emphasized.

An official warning was issued on behalf of the Security Service of Ukraine to Mikhail Dobkin about the inadmissibility of committing a crime under Article 109 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine (“Actions aimed at forcibly changing or overthrowing the constitutional order or seizing state power”).

Criminal proceedings against Dobkin. The Central Investigation Department of the State Security Service of Ukraine began 27 February with regard to 2, part of the 110 article of the Criminal Code of Ukraine ("Infringement on the territorial integrity and inviolability of Ukraine, committed by a representative of the authorities").

Such a reaction of the Security Service of Ukraine followed Dobkin’s public calls for a change in the territorial boundaries of Ukraine in violation of the procedure established by the Constitution.

Interior Minister Arsen Avakov, on his Facebook page, said that Mikhail Dobkin, in response to a request from a border guard officer to wait to “clarify something,” dropped his passport. And then allegedly broke through the border control point at the international airport of Kharkov and disappeared in an unknown direction.

Mikhail Dobkin stressed that he was not going to hide anywhere.
Originator:
http://www.vesti.ru/doc.html?id=1355094
12 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Combat279
    Combat279 8 March 2014 05: 01
    +9
    Prosp (r) al he has his own region, as well as Yanukovych's country.
    Action and movement are life, and he was afraid of the responsibility for making a decision. Yes, and let people down. "POLITIC" of the Square - a coward, a traitor and a selfish person - is a characteristic feature of the modern political elite of Ukraine.
    1. sergey32
      sergey32 8 March 2014 06: 38
      +3
      There is no politician, so full of shit. Like all their independence.
      1. vladimirZ
        vladimirZ 8 March 2014 07: 18
        +2
        Losing and criminal punishment, this is what awaits politicians, officials of the South-East of Ukraine, if they take a position of passivity and neutrality. Only an active struggle with Bandera is able to bring salvation and peace to South-East Ukraine.
        The people of the South-East of Ukraine must be replaced by passive, and therefore Pro-Bandera governors, by people actively fighting their supporters in power.
  2. VADEL
    VADEL 8 March 2014 05: 13
    +6
    a crime under Article 109 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine ("Actions aimed at forcibly changing or overthrowing the constitutional order or at seizing state power").

    Maydonoti initiate criminal proceedings on this article? Nonsense!
    1. raf
      raf 8 March 2014 07: 51
      +1
      Quote: VADEL
      a crime under Article 109 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine ("Actions aimed at forcibly changing or overthrowing the constitutional order or at seizing state power").

      Maydonoti initiate criminal proceedings on this article? Nonsense!
      Bullshit of course, it's like a thief judging a thief!
  3. SkiF_RnD
    SkiF_RnD 8 March 2014 05: 13
    +2
    Sad tendency. I communicate with Ukrainians online and I see that they not only do not want to remember what happened just a couple of weeks ago, but by hook or by crook they are protecting the Maydanuts. In Donetsk, not so, there VKontakte groups are almost the headquarters of the militia. In Lugansk, too, not everything is so bad. But in Kherson and Kharkov, I almost never met anyone who was not for Euromaidan. Even if they say that they do not like this power, they justify themselves by saying that "the situation needs to be stabilized." They say that it was possible for those to seize power, but now it is impossible for others.
  4. Kodar 75
    Kodar 75 8 March 2014 05: 20
    +2
    So it would be clever Yatsenyuk and other trash plant and judge.
  5. smith7
    smith7 8 March 2014 05: 55
    +2
    Something I did not understand ... Dubkin maydanutymi not a friend? Ahhh! This is Yanukovych’s man. Got it smile Well then, this fact is a minor personnel squabble. (Dubkin himself, of course, is not sweet) If it weren’t for the fascists in their government, BP and in fact in power, hell would be the hell with them! But now OURS there, Russian people, are threatened with almost genocide. If not for this, the Russian Federation might not have participated at that level. True unrest, the destructive as a whole have a sharply negative impact on economic relations. But Ukrainians themselves would have settled their lives over time.
  6. Zomanus
    Zomanus 8 March 2014 09: 51
    +1
    Yes, this is just the beginning. The further you go, the more they will clear the territory. And the campaign will be simple for Ukrainians. Tolerate until possible, and then manatki in an armful and to the pits. Let them feed and protect. This I say looking at the dynamics of events today. And I will be very glad if it turns out that I was wrong.
  7. APASUS
    APASUS 8 March 2014 12: 15
    +1
    So much for the first reprisals for political views !!
    The Maidan acts by the same methods as the ousted power, I think it will be even worse!
    Complex slave understand ......
  8. biglow
    biglow 8 March 2014 20: 13
    +1
    Dobkin himself is to blame, he had a chance to become the leader of the liberation movement of the southeast, but according to the old tradition, he betrayed everyone and decided to escape and, of course, to Russia ... and by deed to him ...
  9. inkass_98
    inkass_98 8 March 2014 21: 14
    +1
    And this is correct, because there is no one. There is nothing to take an example from Yanuca, sit on two chairs. We need to decide or decide on you. "When you gaze into the abyss for too long, the abyss begins to peer into you" (Nietzsche).