Military Review

"The best reaction of the Russian Federation to the State Department material is the absence of any reaction"

32
"The best reaction of the Russian Federation to the State Department material is the absence of any reaction"



The material on the US Department of State website "Vladimir Putin's fiction: 10 of false statements about Ukraine" is nothing more than "emotional provocation" by the states. Nevertheless, it is extremely doubtful that such antics of Washington would achieve their goal - even Europe gradually realizes the logical behavior of Putin in the Ukrainian question. All that is required of the Russian leadership now is not to pay attention to such American “tricks,” experts say Alexey Martynov and Pavel Svyatenkov, “Vladimir Putin’s Fiction” - the statement by the US Department of State, which gives 10 supposedly false statements by the Russian leader, came out like that. about the situation in Ukraine. The American authorities, in particular, refuse to recognize the current government of the country as illegitimate, do not recognize the humanitarian crisis, and prefer not to notice the flow of refugees and the facts of attacks on churches and synagogues in southern and eastern Ukraine.

Alexey Martynov, Director of the International Institute of the Newest States, told Golos Rossii how Russia should relate to such behavior in the West.

- How do you comment on these "10 myths", which, according to the White House, have no basis?

- I read the article - there is even nothing to comment on. This article is clearly propaganda. If it were published, for example, on the site of a famous publication that is involved in the information war, one could still find some logic in it. But when such materials are published on the US Department of State website, an attentive reader is only perplexed. There is an attempt to personally insult the president of Russia. I think this is counterproductive and, moreover, unacceptable.

- It is puzzling that the facts that are confirmed are directly denied. For example, the information that the Russian-speaking population of Ukraine is being persecuted. It either closes its eyes, or it is directly refuted.

- Of course. Here the meaning is not in the search for truth. This is a clear agitation, and in the tone of the Cold War. But as a reader, I am asked questions, what do these people want to achieve when the US Department of State, that is, the US Department of Foreign Affairs becomes the author of the information war? Who is the object of this new "cold war" that they want to unleash, taking advantage of the occasion or the situation that they also inspired in Ukraine? These questions are worth considering.

- Who, from your point of view, can be the target audience of this material? After all, a person who more or less follows events is so easy to refute one or other myths. If, for example, talking about refugees, this is also a fact, even though the United States does not recognize it.

- I am convinced that, first of all, the target audience is not limited to listeners or readers in Ukraine or a certain part of Russian or American society. I think that the main target audience is the whole world. All people in the world who are interested in and understand such issues, who are professionally involved in these procedures, understand perfectly what is happening in Ukraine.

The meaning of this message is that America is not worried about Putin’s opinion and, he says, do not listen to what he says, because we will do what we want. This is a kind of declaration of war. Frankly, this is a provocation of emotional reaction, primarily personal from Vladimir Putin as president of Russia, as well as from the Russian state, insulted in the person of its president.

I am sure that Russia will not be “led” to such provocations. By going this way, the Americans will lose. They touched on such things that were not worth affecting, they are trying to play on some deep-seated contradictions (Ukrainian nationalism). There are internal understatements within the family of the Slavic peoples. The United States cannot imagine and does not fully understand the meaning of our common millennial stories.

People who do not have their own thousand-year history cannot think in such categories and evaluate what is happening around them. We and Ukrainians can. I am more than confident that the public, expert Russian-Ukrainian dialogue will definitely be restored, despite the fact that the Americans managed to embroil us.

There is a second component in this article - a kind of signal to Europe: Europeans, do not listen to Putin. And Europe Putin heard and thought. Now we see the reverse process. Europe says, it can be seen in many leading mass media that Putin is right: let's say, we will help establish the Ukrainian state so that the wishes and aspirations of all people, all national, social and regional groups are taken into account. “Let's help return Ukraine a legitimate field,” says Europe with Putin’s words. I am sure that in the case of Europe the United States will not achieve its goal.

- What should be the reaction of the Russian side from your point of view to such a provocation?

- The best reaction in such a situation is the absence of any reaction. You just need not notice what happened. If someone in the West continues to urge, we have the appropriate structures, in particular the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. I think that the Foreign Ministry can quite adequately respond to the US State Department in the spirit of Andrei Andreyevich Gromyko.

- How can you comment on these statements of the US State Department?

- The United States acts on its own advantage. It is clear that in a different situation, what happened in Kiev would have been declared a coup d'état. But since the coup was more pro-Western, and the current Ukrainian leaders are looking in the direction of the European Union and the United States, the United States is rather soft towards them and considers the current Ukrainian leadership to be legitimate, although this is far from the case.

- What do you think about the statements that there is no large flow of refugees or that there is no humanitarian crisis?

- Naturally, there is a diplomatic struggle, a struggle of rhetoric. I do not think that the number of refugees is huge. But it is clear that if the company starts total de-Russification in the south-east of Ukraine, then the refugees will definitely be. Russia in this case also acts as a warning to a similar situation. The United States says that there is nothing supposedly. But in fact, there is a problem.

- But the Russian authorities are already fixing the flow of refugees. Maybe it does not look so terrible compared to the flow of refugees from other conflict zones, but nevertheless it already exists.

- It is possible that there is an influx of people willing to move from Ukraine to Russia, but so far it is not very large. However, the fact is that if it comes to a serious civil confrontation in Ukraine, it will increase.

- In addition, the US State Department refuses to recognize the facts of an attack on a church or a synagogue. Nevertheless, the Russian side has evidence.

- If there is evidence, they need to be made public more widely. It is known that there were calls to start seizing the temples of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate. These calls were not implemented. New Ukrainian authorities do not seek to interfere in church affairs. Nevertheless, they almost immediately went to the abolition of the law, which gives the Russian language the status of a regional one.

The church question for the Ukrainian authorities is not very significant yet, the language predominates, while the illegitimate authorities were not afraid to go into conflict, were not afraid of the threat of civil confrontation. It is clear that the abolition of this law is a program step. Everyone knows that when a new leadership comes to power, the first steps it takes are symbols of what will be done in the future. The American president tried to turn his first decrees into some symbolic acts.

- It seems that the US State Department deliberately closes its eyes to some facts. Why do you think the US State Department considers the current Ukrainian government legitimate?

- If the current government in Ukraine was anti-Western, then, of course, it would have found a huge number of flaws and accused her of much worse crimes. But since the West believes that the current government is pro-Western and that it is leading Ukraine towards an alliance with the EU, naturally, closing its eyes to existing conflicts, it still says that the government is legitimate and its actions are justified.

- For some minor flaws, from the point of view of the West, you can close your eyes in this situation?

- Depends on which side to take. The same event can be served either as an accidental excess, which does not allow talking about the general picture, or as a terrible crime, which testifies to the fact that, say, the Ukrainian government needs to be overthrown. Since the West believes that everything that happened in Kiev is a plus for him, he idealizes the current Kiev leadership. Although it is clear that Yanukovych was overthrown, and no one particularly hides.
Originator:
http://rus.ruvr.ru/2014_03_06/Luchshaja-reakcija-RF-na-material-Gosdepa-otsutstvie-vsjakoj-reakcii-5275/?print=1
32 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Siberian19
    Siberian19 9 March 2014 07: 33
    +9
    Sabaka barks the caravan is coming!
    1. waisson
      waisson 9 March 2014 07: 42
      +22
      don't take it to heart hi
      1. AVV
        AVV 9 March 2014 08: 45
        +1
        Quote: waisson
        don't take it to heart hi

        Yes there is not a sheep, the State Department is a barn, and it is full of sheep !!!
    2. shibi
      shibi 9 March 2014 10: 09
      +1
      The State Department still imagines itself to be the navel of the earth.
      But he does not understand that Russia has revived.
      And a new belly button is tied up.
      And the baby still just jumped leg.
      And when it stirs, it will closely appear to its enemies.
    3. 222222
      222222 9 March 2014 10: 42
      +1
      "The best reaction of the Russian Federation to the State Department material is the absence of any reaction"
      New anecdote: "On March 17 this year, Russia issues an invoice to Ukraine for the use of Crimea"
      1. S_mirnov
        S_mirnov 9 March 2014 11: 34
        +2
        Quote: 222222
        "The best reaction of the Russian Federation to the State Department material is the absence of any reaction"

        A very stupid and harmful misconception is voiced in the title of the article. Type they gave you in the face, and you are 0 reactions and proud of it, you were offended, and you are zero!
        Do not do this if you want to be respected.
        And then you will be poured mud.
        1. alicante11
          alicante11 9 March 2014 12: 04
          0
          What kind of reaction do you expect? "Slowly rockets float away", or "myself"?
          1. S_mirnov
            S_mirnov 9 March 2014 16: 42
            0
            Quote: alicante11
            What kind of reaction do you expect?

            A response statement by the Russian Foreign Ministry where attacks are refuted with evidence and a return move is made! How does this happen with you in dialogue mode.
  2. Name
    Name 9 March 2014 07: 35
    +3
    The reaction ... umm, I would like a reaction from the State Department to statements by Yarosh regarding RUSSIA,Firstly!
    1. major071
      major071 9 March 2014 07: 46
      +11
      And not only the statements of this idiot, but also other facts need to be shown more widely, otherwise they only seized the ban on the Russian language. If you dig a little deeper, then so much derma will come up, no America will help. It is necessary at the state level to tell the truth, to crack Western and pro-Western Ukrainian sites. That we don’t have normal hackers? Okay, I’m a complete zero in this matter, but there are normal guys who can easily crack any protection system (the same money transfers to the West Maidan).
      Something suffered me, apparently the residual effect of yesterday's holiday! hi
  3. Kodar 75
    Kodar 75 9 March 2014 07: 36
    +5
    They just have nothing to oppose to our composure and endurance on their canine bullshit, and they rage in convulsions. Lucky for them geeks - Russia knows how to endure for a long time. Respect to Putin.
  4. Same lech
    Same lech 9 March 2014 07: 40
    +8
    The US State Department was hysterical - not having the ability to somehow influence RUSSIA, they began to stoop to cheap banal provocations ... hehe and this is called a great power, but in my opinion ... WEAK GOPNIK.

    Now Russia needs to behave calmly and squeeze out the maximum possible out of the situation ....- Moreover, in the context of US hysteria, you can easily push the WEST to stupid actions after which they will be in complete heh pop ...

    In general PUTIN crush these suckers ... it's time to end the game of cheap democracy.
    1. Delink
      Delink 9 March 2014 07: 50
      +5
      -Moreover, in conditions of US hysteria, you can easily push the WEST to stupid actions after which they will be in full hehe pop ...


      Because of their weakness, they impose sanctions that cannot critically affect us.
      The main thing is that they cut off accounts in their banks. Then we can certainly write off debts.
      1. waisson
        waisson 9 March 2014 08: 31
        +15
        and to blame us for their sanctions
    2. zzz
      zzz 9 March 2014 09: 19
      +13
      Quote: The same LYOKHA
      Now Russia needs to behave calmly and squeeze out the maximum possible out of the situation ....- Moreover, in the context of US hysteria, you can easily push the WEST to stupid actions after which they will be in complete heh pop ...
      1. v53993
        v53993 9 March 2014 15: 02
        -1
        There will be no sanctions, Russia has not given a penny.
  5. Sibiryak
    Sibiryak 9 March 2014 07: 40
    +3
    The best reaction in such a situation is the absence of any reaction.

    I agree 100%, why pay attention to the "poor", time will tell who will have to drink and from which well.
    1. SRC P-15
      SRC P-15 9 March 2014 08: 54
      +3
      Quote: Sibiryak
      I agree 100%, why pay attention to the "poor", time will tell who will have to drink and from which well.

      True, she is like a pregnant woman’s belly - anyway, someday she will crawl out.
  6. Sergey7311
    Sergey7311 9 March 2014 07: 51
    0
    US double democratic standards in action ...
  7. individual
    individual 9 March 2014 07: 58
    0
    This is again to the question:
    "Who is the head in this house?"
    The answer is:
    "A ladle on the forehead."
  8. Igor39
    Igor39 9 March 2014 08: 00
    0
    There is one rule in the world now: "No rules"
    1. Dimy4
      Dimy4 9 March 2014 10: 11
      0
      Well, someone else has a multicharged gun.
      1. shibi
        shibi 9 March 2014 10: 13
        0
        Bggggygg))))))))
  9. lewerlin53rus
    lewerlin53rus 9 March 2014 08: 07
    0
    Ordinary trolling like network. The best way to fight is to ignore or mock, so far it’s not possible to ban.
  10. 11111mail.ru
    11111mail.ru 9 March 2014 08: 14
    0
    But when such materials appear on the website of the US State Department, the attentive reader is only perplexed. There is an attempt to personally offend the president of Russia. Alexey Martynov

    Previously, they did not hesitate to do this publicly: the Fulton speech of W. Churchill 1946.
    People who do not have their own thousand-year history cannot think in such categories and evaluate what is happening around them. Alexey Martynov

    The Naglo-Saxons, however, also do not have it: the 8th, 9th and 10th centuries of our era, the so-called. "dark ages" Scaligerian chronology, so now mb. in fact, only a year 1714 A.D. http://sudar-bm-rostov.narod.ru/book4/page/page11.htm http://swordmaster.org/2008/01/21/skaligerovskaja_khronologija__istorija_s_belym
    i_pjatnami.html
    "In the XVII century. Isaac Newton devoted more than twenty years to historical research, as a result of which he" moved "the dates of many events closer to our times" where by three hundred to five hundred, and where by two thousand years. "
    We and Ukrainians can. I am more than sure that the public, expert Russian-Ukrainian dialogue will surely recover, Alexey Martynov

    I would like to believe, but the well-known rogue character heard from the electrician a clever phrase: “Consent is a product with complete non-resistance of the parties”, and looking at Bandera’s faces at the negotiating table is not very pleasant, I guess.
  11. upasika1918
    upasika1918 9 March 2014 08: 15
    +2
    In the era of the Internet, tricks with massive lies do not roll. The SGA has never had diplomacy, as such, and no. The State Department is simply the Ministry of Propaganda and Intelligence. Only competent counter-propaganda ALL! means. Only in this way can the Empire of Lies be driven into isolation. NEEDED IMMEDIATELY! to deprive our fifth column of access to any media. Odious people should be ostracized. Jewish officialdom should call its embittered fellow tribesmen to order so that hatred of individual traitors does not affect the whole mass of respectable citizens.
  12. Pesnyadv
    Pesnyadv 9 March 2014 08: 29
    0
    Quote: waisson
    don't take it to heart hi


    Hey man, does it stink out of your mouth?
    And what should smell like yours ?, if I’m in the soul with-s-rali ...
  13. psychologist
    psychologist 9 March 2014 08: 32
    +3
    it's like a fable, an elephant and a pug! ignore it all !! March 16 is not long !! then let them at least say something!
  14. borisjdin1957
    borisjdin1957 9 March 2014 08: 33
    0
    from the Don.
    How many years, Americans walked around the world with impunity, and suddenly, opa-RUSSIA! Any Obkomovites will move the roof!
  15. aepocmam
    aepocmam 9 March 2014 08: 34
    +2
    The Americans want to accuse us of violating the territorial integrity of Ukraine, which we, together with the United States and Great Britain, promised to guarantee under a treaty in exchange for Ukraine's renunciation of nuclear weapons. But they can do this only if they proceed from the fact that there was no violent coup d'etat (revolution) in Ukraine and, therefore, the real Ukrainian government is legitimate. But we, one way or another, will still send our troops into Crimea and the Americans, willingly, unwillingly, will have to admit that a revolution has taken place in Ukraine, because otherwise, the whole basis of the nuclear non-proliferation treaty (guarantees from the United States, Great Britain and Russia) discredits itself and the contract turns into an empty piece of paper. And this is what the United States fears the most. And in order to preserve the treaty, it would be more profitable for the Americans to agree with the interpretation of events with Putin - that there was a revolution in Ukraine, and a new state was formed, to which the guarantors of the "nonproliferation treaty" had no obligations. In other words, Putin is again outright outplaying the Americans. This makes them mad ...
  16. patriot123
    patriot123 9 March 2014 08: 43
    +2
    get mad !!! they are not in the first !!!! lol
  17. 111 soldier
    111 soldier 9 March 2014 08: 55
    +2
    the dog always barks .... if not dead !! float and calm down !! they have no choice!
  18. staryivoin
    staryivoin 9 March 2014 09: 23
    +1
    The US administration and the State Department are increasingly sucking into the manure they have been loading for many years. Sitting in manure "in one" is naturally unpleasant, you want to attract someone else, so at least to get out of there. But this is not about Russia. We didn’t put this pile on it, it’s not for us to rake it. Let's stand and take a look at the "Uncle Sam" cleaning ability !!!
  19. v53993
    v53993 9 March 2014 09: 36
    0
    The best reaction in such a situation is the absence of any reaction. You just need to not notice what happened. If someone in the West continues to be of help, we have the appropriate structures, in particular the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. I think that the Foreign Ministry may well adequately respond to the US State Department in the spirit of Andrei Andreyevich Gromyko.

    I would like to answer in the spirit of Zhukov, and even better in the spirit of Stalin. But I think that they and Shoigu enough.
  20. cerber
    cerber 9 March 2014 09: 44
    +6
    .................................................. ..............................
    .................
  21. skifd
    skifd 9 March 2014 09: 51
    0
    Off topic - tell me how to embed a video !!! Thank you in advance .
  22. vvp2412
    vvp2412 9 March 2014 09: 52
    0
    Then Kerry farted into the water again: If Crimea is included in the Russian Federation, the dip relations between the US and the Russian Federation will be ravaged. Well, go ahead! We are only better! See all amers send. The fifth column will lose the opportunity to go to the embassy to receive tasks!
    Now we must specifically turn on the Crimea, no matter what! Nafig we do not need dip relations with the states. They do more harm than good!
  23. The comment was deleted.
  24. cerber
    cerber 9 March 2014 09: 57
    +1
    wassat wassat wassat love love How prepared are you?
  25. TS3sta3
    TS3sta3 9 March 2014 10: 18
    +2
    all that the State Department can do is pi ... t. as well as the State Department six. State Department six is ​​not an agent of the State Department. an agent of the State Department works for a salary, six - for the right to be a six (which brings great pleasure in the form of the illusion of fighting the "bloody empire of evil").
  26. mabuta
    mabuta 9 March 2014 10: 46
    +6
    The time will come - let's say !!! http: //topwar.ru/uploads/images/2014/952/qapi150.jpg
    1. v53993
      v53993 9 March 2014 15: 30
      -1
      Talked about, talker bird.
  27. Pesnyadv
    Pesnyadv 9 March 2014 10: 58
    0
    The present situation is very similar when a grumpy wife asks her husband a question.
    Then she answers him on behalf of her husband.
    And then he explains what the husband was wrong !!! :)))
  28. Kodar 75
    Kodar 75 9 March 2014 11: 08
    0
    Quote: skifd
    Off topic - tell me how to embed a video !!! Thank you in advance .

    Move the cursor over the square to the left of the letter A "insert media content from other services" Click and insert the link of that page on the k-th video. Next enter and add.
  29. blizart
    blizart 9 March 2014 11: 19
    +1
    A call from Stalin, he picks up the phone. Hello, Mr. Churchill.
    -Nat
    -Nat
    -Nat
    -Nat
    -Yes. Lays down the phone. Companions ask, Comrade Stalin, to which question you answered, Yes.
    -He asked if I could take him well ...
  30. Serebryakov. 75
    Serebryakov. 75 9 March 2014 11: 24
    +1
    laughing State Department is lutting laughing
  31. shibi
    shibi 9 March 2014 11: 27
    0
    Quote: 222222
    "The best reaction of the Russian Federation to the State Department material is the absence of any reaction"
    New anecdote: "On March 17 this year, Russia issues an invoice to Ukraine for the use of Crimea"

    The latest joke:
    Russia bills the United States for the use of Ukraine.
  32. Stinger
    Stinger 9 March 2014 12: 12
    0
    Something is not clear what I mean. If, starting from Kosovo, they decided to live according to concepts, then what kind of market? And, as you know, they are responsible for the bazaar. You can publish a list of honest promises of the West from the time of Gorbi to the present day. I think it will be much longer.
    1. shibi
      shibi 9 March 2014 12: 35
      0
      Polite people came to ask for the "bazaar"
  33. konvalval
    konvalval 9 March 2014 12: 33
    0
    Everything is correct, you do not need to follow the principle: "Itself d ... k". Let them yapping, let them show their true face. This is done when there are no other arguments.
  34. Serafim1983
    Serafim1983 9 March 2014 12: 39
    +1
    Let bamboo smoke and shove their sanctions into their muzzle !!! The time will come we will deal with Tan!
  35. v53993
    v53993 9 March 2014 15: 27
    -1
    [media = http: // http: //topwar.ru/uploads/images/2014/786/nobl27.jpg]
    Dokhudahlala.
  36. dobrik10
    dobrik10 10 March 2014 12: 28
    0
    All these statements from the State Department are just filling the void and declare only in order to declare something.
    Just in order not to forget about mattress mats and what they think is a "weighty" word in geopolitics, only less and less attention is paid to rustles from under the mattress.