Military Review

Putin answered questions about Ukraine: on the deployment of troops, Yanukovych and the situation in Crimea

63



Russian President Vladimir Putin on Tuesday, March 4, gathered Russian and foreign journalists to state his position on events in Ukraine. The conversation took place in the presidential residence in Novo-Ogarevo. The live broadcast of the meeting was conducted by the Russia 24 channel.

In Ukraine, there was an anti-constitutional coup and the seizure of power

Vladimir Putin regards recent events in Ukraine as an anti-constitutional coup and an armed seizure of power.

“There can be only one assessment: it is an anti-constitutional coup and an armed seizure of power,” Putin said. “Nobody argues with this. Who argues with this? There’s a question for me, which neither I can answer, nor my colleagues, with which, as you know, I have been discussing the problem of Ukraine by phone a lot lately. The question is: why was this done? "

Ignoring the 21 arrangement of February, the Ukrainian opposition achieved the opposite effect and only rocked the situation in the country, Putin said. “They wanted to humiliate someone, show their strength. I think they achieved a result opposite to expectation. Because these actions have largely swung the east and south-east of Ukraine,” Putin said.

According to the Russian president, Viktor Yanukovych is the only legitimate head of the Ukrainian state, although in fact he has lost real power. “It is clear that he has no power, but I have already spoken about this and I want to repeat: only Yanukovych is legally the only legitimate president,” he stressed.

Yanukovych has no political future

Putin also said that he saw Yanukovych two days ago in Russia. “He was alive and well, and so he wishes,” the president said in response to a request for comment on rumors about the possible death of Yanukovych. "He will still catch a cold at the funeral of those who spread this information," the president joked.

At the same time, the president said that he had no sympathy for this policy. “No, I have other completely sentimental feelings,” he said, answering the question of whether he sympathizes with Yanukovych. Nevertheless, the president did not specify what exactly he feels. According to him, a person who bears on his shoulders the duties of the head of state should fulfill the will of those people who entrusted him to the country. At the same time it is necessary to act within the law. “It’s necessary to analyze whether he did everything from what the law and the mandate of voters gave him,” the president said.

The reason for the introduction of troops can only be an extreme case.

Vladimir Putin also told reporters that Russian troops in Ukraine can only be used as a last resort. Speaking about the legitimacy of this step, Putin recalled that "Russia has a direct appeal from the legitimate president of Ukraine, Viktor Yanukovych, about using the armed forces to protect the life, freedom and health of the citizens of Ukraine."

At the same time, he expressed confidence that the Russian and Ukrainian military personnel would not enter into confrontation and would be on one side of the barricades.
Changes in the republics of the former USSR should take place strictly within the constitutional framework, Putin stressed. “In the post-Soviet space, where there are very fragile political structures, a very weak economy, you need to act exclusively by constitutional means,” the Russian president said.

"The people, of course, wanted a change, but illegal changes should not be encouraged," he continued. At the same time, the radical elements, according to him, “still do not require some repair of the facade of power on the Maidan, but require radical changes.”

“I understand their demands, because they are already accustomed to changing swindlers for some swindlers,” Putin said.

At the same time, Putin noted that if lawlessness begins in the eastern regions of Ukraine, Russia reserves the right to use all means at its disposal to protect the people living there.

If such a decision is made, Putin said, then it will fully comply with international law.

Russia only strengthened the protection of its military facilities in the Crimea

Putin believes that the tense situation in the Crimea, under which it was possible to use the armed forces, was averted. He drew the attention of journalists to the fact that not a single shot has yet been sounded, there have been no casualties.

“The only need was that we increased the security of our military facilities, because they were constantly receiving threats, and we saw that militants from nationalist organizations were pulling up in the Crimea,” Putin said. "We did it - and did it right and in a timely manner," the Russian president stressed.

He also promised that Russia would provide financial assistance to the Crimea. “We have decided to organize the work of the regions of the Russian Federation to provide appropriate assistance to the Crimea, which turned to us for humanitarian support. And we, of course, will do it,” said Putin.

Situation in financial markets is temporary

The reaction of financial markets to events in Ukraine is a temporary phenomenon, the Russian president said. "Politics always affects markets one way or another. Money loves silence, calmness and stability. But it seems to me that this is a temporary phenomenon and a temporary influence," he said.

Vladimir Putin was asked what would happen if a number of countries impose sanctions against Russia. He replied that those who are going to introduce them should think about the consequences, and warned that the damage would be mutual.

Russia is preparing for the G8 summit, but if the partners do not want, then do not

Regarding the upcoming G-8 summit, Putin said that Russia is still preparing. Earlier opinions were expressed that some Western countries may refuse to participate in the summit.

“As for the G-8, I don’t know,” Putin said. “We’re preparing for the G-8, we’ll be ready to host our colleagues, but if they don’t want to come, don’t.”

Vladimir Putin also said that Russia will withdraw the ambassador from Washington only as a last resort. "This is an extreme measure. But if necessary, it will be used," he said. "But I really would not want to," the Russian president stressed. According to him, not only Russia with its partners is interested in cooperation at the international level "in the sphere of economics, politics, international security, but also our partners are interested in cooperation with us."

Gazprom intends to fix the debt of Ukraine for gas at the old price

In the course of communication with journalists, Putin said that Gazprom was talking about fixing Ukraine’s debt for gas supplies at the old price, and not about ending the provision of discounts from April. He noted that earlier, Gazprom had agreed with Ukraine on a discount on the price of gas and a loan to pay off debts for the fuel already supplied, while Ukraine pledged to regularly pay for gas supplies. Putin stressed that, despite the provision of discounts and loans, however, Ukraine’s debt for gas supplies to Gazprom already amounts to 1,5-1,6 billion dollars, and if it does not receive a payment for February, it will already reach two billion. "Under these conditions, Gazprom says, if you don’t pay anyway, then let's fix at a normal price, not at a reduced price," the Russian president said. He stressed that this is not connected with the events in Ukraine or with politics. “They gave money, they lowered gas prices, but there are no payments. Naturally, Gazprom says: that will not work,” Putin concluded.
63 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. kind
    kind 5 March 2014 06: 53
    +8
    ... “Under these conditions, Gazprom says, if you don’t pay anyway, then let’s fix it at a normal price and not at a reduced one,” the Russian president said. He stressed that this is not related to either the events in Ukraine or politics. “The money was given, gas prices were lowered, but there were no payments. Naturally, Gazprom says: it won't work like that,” Putin summed up.

    Well, where are the cries about the capture of Ukraine by Russia ??? What do the self-proclaimed think about their people there? Something the EU with mattresses are in no hurry to help. Likely another scum of a ponder.
    1. mojohed2012
      mojohed2012 5 March 2014 08: 07
      0
      I saw in YouTube a video of the Ukrainian program Schuster, in which this comrade ranted in the presence of spectator students of Ukrainian universities, who hardly have any idea of ​​the situation in the country and clearly can not mind.
      So, this person several times argued that Ukraine and the Russian Federation are at war and there are already clashes, that the Russians annexed Crimea and that the Russian media are not objective. I read the oath of Hypocrates converted to the oath of a journalist.
      1. elmi
        elmi 5 March 2014 09: 35
        +2
        Quote: mojohed2012
        I saw in YouTube a video of the Ukrainian program Schuster, in which this comrade ranted in the presence of spectator students of Ukrainian universities, who hardly have any idea of ​​the situation in the country and clearly can not mind.
        So, this man several times argued that Ukraine and the Russian Federation are at war and there are already clashes that the Russians annexed Crimea and that the Russian media are not objective. I read the oath of Hypocrates converted to the oath of a journalist.

        Such figures should be banned from entering Russia, you look at others, these measures should be sobering because he used to work in Russia for sure with time hopes to return. But somehow we quickly forgive anti-Russian attacks, I mean when Verka Serdyuchka sang an anti-Russian song at Eurovision. We were indignant for about a year, threatened not to let him perform in Russia, but as a result, everything was forgotten and he still rakes money here.
  2. Bigriver
    Bigriver 5 March 2014 06: 56
    +10
    Confident, clear, simple.
    In his own style :))
    +
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 5 March 2014 07: 06
      -4
      Quote: BigRiver
      Confident, clear, simple.

      If you don’t take into account that our military is not in the rogue. Although there are a lot of videos with machine numbers of 21,90,76 on the network. Why lie? He would say they entered and still introduce if chaos continues.
      And what is being turned into in the West now, we will stand behind the backs of women and children. Considering that our channels are being cut down, the southeast news will get this very info with the coolest sauce.
      Talk about the integrity of Ukraine and create a Defense Ministry in Crimea ??? Yesterday I said that Putin was better silent and today I’ll say it.
      1. click80
        click80 5 March 2014 07: 25
        +5
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        If you do not take into account that our military is not in the rogue


        Sasha welcome hi . how is it that our troops are not in the Crimea? But did someone deduce the Black Sea Fleet of the Russian Federation? eg
        102nd SDSS PDSS (according to Wikipedia smile )
        810th Marine Brigade of the Black Sea Fleet
        1. Duke
          Duke 5 March 2014 07: 36
          +2
          And ma in the Crimea under international agreements can have up to 25000 people.
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. atalef
            atalef 5 March 2014 09: 23
            -6
            Quote: Duke
            And ma in the Crimea under international agreements can have up to 25000 people.

            And then what do they do the same under an international treaty? Well then, what are we generally blaming Americans for?
            1. Alexander Romanov
              Alexander Romanov 5 March 2014 10: 29
              0
              Quote: atalef
              Well then, what are we generally blaming Americans for?

              In the overthrow of power. This is the answer flew laughing
            2. Max_Bauder
              Max_Bauder 5 March 2014 12: 17
              0
              And at least the fact that Russian drones do not strike at civilians both in Iraq and Afghanistan.
        2. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov 5 March 2014 07: 46
          +1
          Quote: click80
          810th Marine Brigade of the Black Sea Fleet

          Hello, Sergey! I have not seen you for a hundred years (read) laughing Have you ever seen one INFANTRY on the news? I saw only soldiers without identification marks. Here we are talking about them.
          1. click80
            click80 5 March 2014 10: 18
            0
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            Have you ever seen one INFANTRY on the news?

            For example:
            http://www.sobytiya.info/news/14/38983
            1. Alexander Romanov
              Alexander Romanov 5 March 2014 10: 31
              0
              Quote: click80
              http://www.sobytiya.info/news/14/38983

              And look at the video network, there are no insignia. Everyone knows the names, they know that the infantry, but .... request
              1. click80
                click80 5 March 2014 10: 46
                0
                Quote: Alexander Romanov
                And look at the video network, there are no insignia. Everyone knows the names, they know that the infantry, but ....

                Well, it’s normal practice, in any special operations, one can say in the territory of an unfriendly state (do not throw slippers at me, I mean Ukraine, whose power is currently the enemy of Russia), at the direction of the commander, remove the identification marks so as not to give out belonging to the RF Armed Forces
                1. The comment was deleted.
                2. atalef
                  atalef 5 March 2014 11: 42
                  0
                  Quote: click80
                  Well, it's normal practice, with any special operations, one can say in the unfriendly territory

                  So Ukraine is rightly accused of aggression?
                  1. sniper
                    sniper 5 March 2014 18: 25
                    0
                    Quote: atalef
                    So Ukraine is rightly accused of aggression?

                    What kind of aggression are we talking about ???? Am I missing something? Under an agreement between Russia and Ukraine on the Black Sea Fleet, 25000 Russian troops can be based in Crimea, now there are about 14000 of them, what’s wrong ????
          2. Max_Bauder
            Max_Bauder 5 March 2014 12: 24
            0
            Deceit for the sake of good is not considered a sin, but in a political game it’s generally a wise move.

            "A good diplomat improvises on what should be said and carefully prepares what should be kept silent." - Talleyrand (French diplomat of the era of the Napoleonic wars).
        3. The comment was deleted.
        4. atalef
          atalef 5 March 2014 09: 02
          0
          Quote: click80
          for example, the 102nd PSD PDSS (according to Wikipedia) the 810th Marine Brigade of the Black Sea Fleet

          And on the basis of what they are doing, what they are doing (unknown armed groups). In general, in a normal language, this is called --- well, you yourself know laughing
          1. sniper
            sniper 5 March 2014 18: 30
            0
            Quote: atalef
            And on the basis of what they do, what they do (unknown armed groups)

            So who is doing something ??? Russian military personnel or unknown armed groups ??? Do you have facts, evidence? In the studio plz ... Well, if there is nothing to prove, then do not lie on the site ...
      2. Riperbahn
        Riperbahn 5 March 2014 08: 23
        +2
        Well, you really want him to say everything directly and acknowledge. What for? The GDP said - the language was given to the diplomat to hide his thoughts. So it is in politics. Everyone already sees the license plate numbers in the Crimea, but there is nothing to present to the president! Competently.
        1. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov 5 March 2014 08: 40
          +1
          Quote: Riperbahn
          Well, you really want him to say everything directly and acknowledge. What for?

          Why lie when everyone already knows the truth?
          1. Riperbahn
            Riperbahn 5 March 2014 08: 43
            +3
            He is not lying again. He makes it clear by the methods accepted in politics - we know what you know, but we will not give a reason to blame us!
            1. atalef
              atalef 5 March 2014 09: 04
              +2
              Quote: Riperbahn
              He is not lying again. He’s using the methods accepted in politics to make it clear that we know what you know, but we won’t give a reason to blame us

              And they answer him in diplomatic language - we know that you know what we know - therefore
              nothing to lie
            2. The comment was deleted.
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. atalef
          atalef 5 March 2014 08: 59
          -1
          Quote: Riperbahn
          Well, you really want him to say everything directly and acknowledge. What for?

          Then, it’s so stupid to lie to the first person of the state that you certainly don’t watch hostile channels, but everyone just laughs there - whether you like it or not, but if everyone knows the truth --- why push such a desu misuse - all the more so to the president .
      3. Ustas
        Ustas 5 March 2014 08: 31
        +1
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        Although the network has a bunch of videos with car numbers 21,90,76. So why lie?

        Yesterday, on the Sevastoplya website, I saw a video from YouTube, there is one deputy com company of the Crimean militia (militias are standing with the military), gave an interview to the correspondent of the Tatar television of Crimea. And there were questions, who are these military men and why are Russian car numbers? To which he replied, the military are Crimean citizens, and sponsors allocated vehicles with Russian license plates to them (militias). And in the end, he added, soon you will find out everything and it will be a surprise for you.
  3. ikken
    ikken 5 March 2014 06: 56
    +1
    Wait, wait, what have not been posted by the successes of the "nationalization" of the army? The Supreme Commander-in-Chief reported:
    Quote: Vladimir Putin
    By the way, when I looked at the certificate yesterday, what did they take there, it’s just some kind of fortified area. There are several dozen S-300 installations, several dozens of Bukovs, 22 thousand military personnel, and other weapons. But, thank God, all this now, as I said, without a single shot is in the hands of the people of Crimea.
  4. major071
    major071 5 March 2014 06: 59
    +17
    hi Good morning everyone!
    Yesterday, after watching the speech of V.V. Putin climbed to Ukrainian sites. This is a complete paragraph! Everything that Putin said is turned upside down and served with another sauce. For example, Putin’s phrase about Yanukovych that if he had stayed in Kiev he would have been killed was filed as Putin is going to kill Yanukovych. How many are there blinded with brainwashed, and trolls generally heaped. At first I tried to explain something, I was sent to x .., then I started to fight with their own weapons. Here, b ... b, there was a squeal. After 10 minutes of war I was banned. Reluctant to hear the truth.
    1. Pit
      Pit 5 March 2014 07: 13
      +1
      Quote: major071
      After 10 minutes of the war I was banned. Reluctant to hear the truth.

      Not right a little bit. It’s just that someone doesn’t want anyone to tell this truth, that’s banned. And if they just didn’t want to hear, then they would have lit the srach for a week.
    2. atalef
      atalef 5 March 2014 07: 24
      +1
      Quote: major071
      hi Good morning everyone!
      Yesterday, after watching the speech of V.V. Putin climbed to Ukrainian sites. This is a complete paragraph! Everything that Putin said is turned upside down ..... They don’t want to hear the truth.

      I don’t understand why lying there is no Russian troops, well, now it’s not the 19th century, it’s clear, I’m not saying that in my understanding Crimea was always Russian and did not identify with Ukraine, I say that the first person didn’t states so lie
      1. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 5 March 2014 07: 27
        0
        Quote: atalef

        I don’t understand why to lie that there are no Russian troops

        Hi Sanya! Get ready to get a bunch of minuses, I grabbed them yesterday for my misunderstanding, they’ll stick again laughing
        But why lie, no one will answer. He asks permission to enter the military, then says that they are not there. Where is the logic ????????????????????????? ??
        1. philip
          philip 5 March 2014 07: 31
          +1
          I will try to explain. There they are. Yes, everything is under the agreement, in CRIMEA.
          1. Alexander Romanov
            Alexander Romanov 5 March 2014 07: 42
            +1
            Quote: Philip
            I will try to clarify

            Mutually it was about "Polite people" who do not have identification marks. Why say that someone bought our uniform somewhere. Everyone, including YOU, perfectly understand that these are ours. So why deny it, what are we afraid of? Let the Eggheads come in fear, so that polite people would not come to them.
            This is the first and second. In the news they are constantly talking about the transition of parts to our side. At least one part was shown on the news. After yesterday’s Ukrainian campaign to Balaklava, I won’t believe more without video confirmation.
            1. philip
              philip 5 March 2014 07: 50
              0
              I agree that the zhurnalugs are not squeezing, on the one hand they are talking about moving to the Crimea side of the PART, and on the other, about its disarmament and blocking.
            2. LeXXSkAt
              LeXXSkAt 5 March 2014 08: 02
              0
              Quote: Alexander Romanov
              Quote: Philip
              I will try to clarify

              Mutually it was about "Polite people" who do not have identification marks. Why say that someone bought our uniform somewhere. Everyone, including YOU, perfectly understand that these are ours. So why deny it, what are we afraid of? Let the Eggheads come in fear, so that polite people would not come to them.
              This is the first and second. In the news they are constantly talking about the transition of parts to our side. At least one part was shown on the news. After yesterday’s Ukrainian campaign to Balaklava, I won’t believe more without video confirmation.


              As for the Polite people ... Officially, this is Crimean self-defense, but the fact that they were equipped with the Russian Federation, well, what people asked for help helped them.
              1. Alexander Romanov
                Alexander Romanov 5 March 2014 08: 22
                0
                Quote: LeXXSkAt
                Officially, this is Crimean self-defense, but the fact that they were equipped with the Russian Federation, well, what did people ask for help and helped them.

                Who are you now hanging noodles on my ears, me? And they also bought tigers with numbers 21, trucks with numbers 90 and 76. Probably, self-defense units drove to the Urals for 76 cars.
                1. sniper
                  sniper 5 March 2014 18: 40
                  0
                  Quote: Alexander Romanov
                  ? And tigers with numbers 21,

                  Alexander, even under the Union, numbers on military equipment were changed like gloves, especially during exercises ... So I would be more convinced by the lack of numbers ...
            3. atalef
              atalef 5 March 2014 08: 05
              0
              After yesterday’s Ukrainian campaign to Balaklava, I won’t believe more without video confirmation.

              Sanya, this is a well-known tactic and no one will be able to oppose it, surrounded by journalists, the Ukrainian military (note the faithful oath), and not Berezovsky (believe in the relocation of souls) - they will go without weapons, I want to see the first one who shoots them.
              The officer takes the oath once, or is faithful to her until the end or resigns, what are they seeking? Exalt what is a shame to any man of honor?
              I like these comments, collecting 100 (+) - such as how to explain to my son that the hero of Ukraine killed his father’s officer (I don’t quite understand who they are talking about), but I would send them to the Russian hero Kadyrov, he probably has experience what to say when asked about the killing of RA officers - a hero of Russia
              1. Alexander Romanov
                Alexander Romanov 5 March 2014 08: 24
                0
                Quote: atalef
                this is a well-known tactic and no one can oppose it

                Three hundred soldiers would have been called, America would have been screaming with us. The journal aside, the cameras were taken and sent. It seems that Crimea is no longer subordinate to Kiev, and Kiev and overseas journalists need to receive new accreditation. There’s a kick in the ass and no video.
              2. FiremanRS
                FiremanRS 5 March 2014 08: 33
                0
                Dear, then there is now neither the Ukrainian nor the Russian senior officers in the army with honor. They all swore allegiance to the USSR. I am grateful to my father for showing me how it should be with his example. He came to the retirement, but neither the Ukrainian took the oath, and when from there they gently asked, neither the Russian. Russia at least has not driven out. Although the ordeals received enough for such principles.
            4. sniper
              sniper 5 March 2014 18: 37
              0
              Quote: Alexander Romanov
              it was about "Polite people" who do not have identification marks. Why say that someone bought our uniform somewhere. Everyone and YOU, including you, perfectly understand that these are our

              Well, it seems so to us .... And who are they really ???? Maybe you have the exact data, so share ... Surnames, ranks, etc., etc. ... Well, in another case - these are our speculations that do not need to be passed off as the ultimate truth ... Something like this, in my opinion ...
        2. LeXXSkAt
          LeXXSkAt 5 March 2014 07: 35
          0
          Alexander, a hundred times in all topics has surfaced and the GDP does not deny this, but the Russian Federation has strengthened the protection of its bases in the Crimea. We did not send troops; we guard our bases and weapons on them. It’s completely normal from my point of view to maintain order ...
          1. atalef
            atalef 5 March 2014 08: 09
            -1
            Quote: LeXXSkAt
            Alexander, a hundred times in all topics has surfaced and the GDP does not deny this, but the Russian Federation has strengthened the protection of its bases in the Crimea. We did not send troops; we guard our bases and weapons on them. It’s completely normal from my point of view to maintain order ...

            Oh, well, you just need to hang noodles, I have seen quite a bit in my life and know how to turn on my brain a bit, then tell me tales. You understand everything yourself, here it’s not the editors of the Red Star and you are not the mouthpiece of Russia Tudey- here you can tell the truth
          2. atalef
            atalef 5 March 2014 09: 27
            0
            Quote: LeXXSkAt
            We did not send troops, we guard our bases and weapons on them

            Are Ukrainian bases the same? And why were weapons taken out of there? In general, why are we lying to ourselves?
          3. The comment was deleted.
        3. atalef
          atalef 5 March 2014 07: 57
          +1
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          Quote: atalef

          I don’t understand why to lie that there are no Russian troops

          Hi Sanya! Get ready to get a bunch of minuses, I grabbed them yesterday for my misunderstanding, they’ll stick again laughing
          But why lie, no one will answer. He asks permission to enter the military, then says that they are not there. Where is the logic ????????????????????????? ??

          hi Sanya!
          Yes, what is the logic? Where from? Block Ukrainian units - so that the right sector does not enter Crimea? I would understand if they controlled the crossings, stations, settlements - yes, why block the Ukrainian units - which in theory should protect the Crimeans from the same? Why should they give out Russian citizenship? Should the goal be protected from the right sector?
          My sister-in-law lives in Semfiropol - if she says ......... that everyone already knows whose troops are coming from, and she also says that the greatest fear of Crimeans is that Crimea will not be annexed to Russia , but will be left in a position like Transnistria or Abkhazia. That they will be in a position of unknown people, suspended - and not Ukrainians and, in general, not full-fledged Russians. Do you think Crimea will be attached?
          1. Alexander Romanov
            Alexander Romanov 5 March 2014 08: 27
            0
            Quote: atalef
            why block Ukrainian units

            If the new state is standing, then blocking or disarming parts of the old is understandable.
            Quote: atalef
            . Do you think Crimea will be attached?

            I think there will be a new country, the Crimean Republic, with its army and everything else. Russia certainly recognizes, but so far I think it will be like Abkhazia. Billions of infusions and all that.
            1. atalef
              atalef 5 March 2014 09: 35
              +1
              Quote: Alexander Romanov
              I think there will be a new country, the Crimean Republic, with its army and everything else. Russia certainly recognizes, but so far I think it will be like Abkhazia. Billions of infusions and all that.

              Sanya is right because Putin does not need Crimea as part of Russia; he needs Ukraine with a territorial conflict, which automatically blocks its road to NATO and the EU. This is what Crimeans most of all are afraid of, that they will be thrown, and they will be thrown and left in a position of an unrecognized state - so half Russians on the one hand and passports of the Crimea (like Abkhazians, for example, that the edges of Vinisuela, Nicaragua and Tuvalu are nowhere you will leave) - they will block the dig - exit only through Kerch. airport - local lines, train - no train. People will be thrown as always for the sake of politics, only Crimeans are not Abkhazians, and even Tatars in addition. The problem will be in the future.
              This is what is most afraid of in Crimea. Crimea as a separate state is soon an uprising and internal conflict already in Crimea. So in any case, says the brother-in-law's sister.
              Either joining Russia or staying in Ukraine already - no one needs a semi-state there.
              1. Alexander Romanov
                Alexander Romanov 5 March 2014 10: 39
                0
                Quote: atalef
                he needs Ukraine with territorial conflict

                Yes, no, stability will be better. He needs his own pro-Russian power in Ukraine to the fifth point. It will not work, well then you can leave or recognize the independence of the entire eastern region of Ukraine in suspense. Westerners will then get into the loot. EU and USA stupidly will fulfill their budget.
                Quote: atalef
                This is what Crimeans most of all are afraid of, that they will be thrown, and they will be thrown and left in the position of an unrecognized state

                Russia recognizes and that's enough.
                Quote: atalef
                Either joining Russia or staying in Ukraine already - no one needs a semi-state there

                In general, there is an option if the people in a referendum vote in favor of reunification with Russia ..... the slow-witted people came up with some kind of law on the accession of new lands to Russia. In short, one can see the hell.
            2. The comment was deleted.
      2. philip
        philip 5 March 2014 07: 41
        0
        Sorry for the guy from the video hesitated, confused. And the answer is simple. To protect the base of the Russian Navy from fascist gangs.
        1. atalef
          atalef 5 March 2014 08: 12
          +1
          Quote: Philip
          Sorry for the guy from the video hesitated, confused. And the answer is simple. To protect the base of the Russian Navy from fascist gangs.

          These formations would have shown at least once, or something like that in the Crimea in a second, self-defense was organized with all the equipment from Special Forces weapons to the Tigers - and long-trained and paid gangs in the west with some kind of pots on their heads ran across the Maidan, where are the gangs? from whom are we defending ourselves? Blocking Ukrainian units? Or protecting them from banderlog?
        2. Ustas
          Ustas 5 March 2014 08: 53
          0
          Quote: Philip
          Sorry for the guy from the video hesitated, confused. And the answer is simple. To protect the base of the Russian Navy from fascist gangs.

          I obviously missed political activities, so I don’t know what to answer.
      3. nemec55
        nemec55 5 March 2014 07: 43
        0
        Yes, and the question arises WHAT nafig this descendant of Genghis Khan was put there to talk. EPT where the instruction is where the mouth is shut. We would put the prepared political officer in each unit.
        1. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov 5 March 2014 07: 56
          0
          Quote: nemec55
          Yes, and the question arises WHAT nafig this descendant of Genghis Khan put there to talk

          This is Tuva, what to take from him.
          1. Ustas
            Ustas 5 March 2014 08: 55
            0
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            This is Tuva, what to take from him.

            Maybe Tuva, but he had to say that he was a Crimean Tatar.
            1. nemec55
              nemec55 5 March 2014 12: 55
              0
              So I’m talking about if we were already preparing to lie so beautifully. I am a local dressed in a warehouse, I will defend my house EVERYTHING. And also <GO Nafig>
        2. atalef
          atalef 5 March 2014 09: 06
          -1
          Quote: nemec55
          Yes, and the question arises WHAT nafig this descendant of Genghis Khan was put there to talk. EPT where the instruction is where the mouth is shut. We would put the prepared political officer in each unit.

          It seems that this is the first Mongol who revealed the great secret - yes, the tube is full of commercials. You don’t even have to be a spy here - everything is laid out on a plate. Why should the Russians lie?
          1. wasjasibirjac
            wasjasibirjac 5 March 2014 15: 22
            +1
            probably a soldier is needed not to speak beautifully, but to accurately shoot enemies. and in this Tuva is much better than Moscow
        3. The comment was deleted.
          1. Alexander Romanov
            Alexander Romanov 5 March 2014 10: 41
            0
            Quote: atalef
            . Why should the Russians lie?

            And hell knows. I generally got the impression that Putin, giving interviews to our media, actually spoke to the media of the West. Otherwise, I can’t explain all this insanity.
            1. nemec55
              nemec55 5 March 2014 13: 10
              0
              Alexander’s answer is simple. Most of the Russian population is vegetables — no matter how rude they sound, they only need Internet for Vkontakte. Odnoklassniki and all sorts of crap. I talk a lot with people about my work. Such nonsense in my head, one with foam at the mouth proved that it the Americans, seeing this number on the Tiger, say that this is a hammer. The 90s is just a guard. Here’s an interview for them from Vladimir Vladimirovich. And for you, Alexander, you are not a stupid person to give an interview and you know everything yourself.
  5. svp67
    svp67 5 March 2014 07: 05
    +2
    Russia only strengthened the protection of its military facilities in the Crimea
    It did more - by removing weapons from the army depots, it deprived the "opposition" of the opportunity to immediately arm its "hundreds", which could seep onto the peninsula ...
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. atalef
      atalef 5 March 2014 09: 12
      +1
      Quote: svp67
      It did more - by removing weapons from army depots, deprived the "opposition" of the opportunity to immediately arm their "hundreds", which could seep onto the peninsula

      that is, are you sure that the Ukrainian army would have so easily taken and distributed these weapons to them?
      Where are the gangs? Show at least one.
      Here self-defense that arose within one day, trained and equipped with the last word (even a pixel shape - which turns out to be straightforward to buy in any store) and the Tigers apparently are freely sold - appeared from nowhere. With headquarters (as I understand it), or as they are coordinated, with communications, supplies, automotive equipment and fuel and lubricants.
      Is all this self-defense? If it’s self-defense, then it’s more like pre-trained, trained and equipped illegal armed groups, and if not, it’s not given to the armed forces of the Russian Federation. laughing
      1. Igmail
        Igmail 5 March 2014 10: 08
        0
        Even if so, how do you hint that something will change from this? Everything is correct, the time will come and everything will be explained, what to shout ahead of time.
      2. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 5 March 2014 10: 44
        0
        Quote: atalef
        , trained and equipped - illegal armed groups

        Russian Federation laughing
  6. The comment was deleted.
  7. visitor
    visitor 5 March 2014 07: 26
    +6
    Putin is an alpha male. He hasn’t entered anything yet, and some are already fighting in ecstasy.
  8. nemec55
    nemec55 5 March 2014 07: 32
    +5
    Annealed out Putin <THERE BEHIND THE BIG PUD> laughing In general, well done, eloquent as always. But it is necessary to crush these reptiles as not legitimate and lead to the overthrow of the invaders. Otherwise, the trouble will be in eastern Ukraine and in the future when they spread their wings there will be blood.
    1. svp67
      svp67 5 March 2014 07: 40
      +1
      Quote: nemec55
      Annealed out Putin <THERE BEHIND THE BIG PUD>

      Well, now you can safely declare the existence of the MADUAL-UNITED STATES - ZSS lol
  9. Igarr
    Igarr 5 March 2014 07: 59
    +11
    Like, do not like Putin ....
    Finish rotten bazaar - what for lying? Let's tell the truth ...
    Let's.
    Did you see Keri on the Maidan yesterday? Seen it. Did you hear what he was saying? Heard.
    So why aren’t you screaming that he is lying, and Alexander?
    Ten, twenty soldiers, one company, three companies entered into a foreign country - THIS IS NOT A WAR! These are the soldiers.
    And here is the tactical unit for BU introduced in another country - this is PRECEDENT.
    The tactical unit is the battalion.
    It is necessary to separate one from the other. And to understand what lies and what doesn’t.
    US strengthened embassy security in Kiev? Well, at least there was information. Why aren’t we screaming - did the Americans send troops? And what we, as normal people, understand - it is necessary, they protect themselves.
    We alone, damn it, dohren honest ......
    I put big and fat on world opinion. A. Romanov - not so long ago he himself spoke about the same thing.
    Let Putin lie to their eyes fifty times, and even spit - I will only welcome you.
    Because he stands for Russia. And not for some kind of truth, mythical.
    The truth is where we are. I will stand on that.
    .
    But inside the country - it’s another matter.
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 5 March 2014 08: 31
      0
      Quote: Igarr
      And here is the tactical unit for BU introduced in another country - this is PRECEDENT

      And they saw what Churkin said-the United States introduced to Grenada or wherever there, an army to protect the 1000 Americans living there.
      So, if we deny that our soldiers are not our soldiers, then there is nothing to ask for a request for the introduction of the military. Moreover, Yanukovych, whom we consider the president, asked for the introduction of the military. What are the problems?
      Kerry has problems, well, these are Kerry's problems.
      1. Igarr
        Igarr 5 March 2014 08: 49
        +4
        Our soldiers bear the sign of belonging to the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation.
        And if they don’t wear it, then who is it?
        And why should Putin fit in for them?
        ..
        Who forbade soldiers to wear the sleeve flag? Let's ask that.
        ..
        There was an interview yesterday with the company’s chief of staff, at least he introduced himself like that, Vasily from the self-defense units in the Crimea (he didn’t make out his name, like Yavorsky, or something).
        The interview was given by APR, the Crimean Tatar television.
        So .... this is clearly our friend. At the level of Major Special Forces. I give a tooth.
        But how he parted everyone for sure, the tyutelk to the tyutelk.
        And I remember how there the prisoners voted when he recalled the repair of the embankment at the expense of Turkey. Exposure, our Crimean Tatar comrades, refused a fly.
        Our officer, not recognized. Honor and praise be to him.
        ...
        If only it were that simple. Honestly.
        ...
        Atalef is perplexed. And what is there to bewilder. Israel can be honest. And on its own. And because America is looming behind him. Behind the plug hides.
        But there is no one behind Russia!
        But around, and around, and inside .... mom do not worry.
        1. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov 5 March 2014 10: 47
          0
          Quote: Igarr
          And if they don’t wear it, then who is it?

          That is, if I am a soldier and they order me to leave at such a point, without insignia, after that I will cease to be a soldier in Russia?
          Quote: Igarr
          ..
          Who forbade soldiers to wear the sleeve flag? Let's ask that.

          Well, just don’t have to crush the loaves of Putin laughing
          Quote: Igarr
          But there is no one behind Russia!

          Here I am about the same. Then we are deceiving whom-ourselves?
      2. svp67
        svp67 5 March 2014 09: 12
        0
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        So, if we deny that our soldiers are not our soldiers, then there is nothing to ask for a request for the introduction of the military. Moreover, Yanukovych, whom we consider the president, asked for the introduction of the military. What are the problems?

        The funny thing is not what. Diplomatic subtleties - you don’t even have to send our troops into the territory of Crimea, they are already there and under the agreement we are allowed to have 25 troops in Crimea, and we have 000, and 16 (read a division or several brigades) we can’t enter, but to bring ... What they did in the past exercises.
    2. Ustas
      Ustas 5 March 2014 09: 01
      0
      Quote: Igarr
      The truth is where we are. I will stand on that.

      I support a hundred times. And I don’t give a damn, Russians are military men from Russia or Russian Crimeans, the main thing is that they protect themselves and their right, the right of Russians to live, speak, and choose on their land.
      Crimea is Russian land!
    3. atalef
      atalef 5 March 2014 09: 14
      0
      Quote: Igarr
      Ten, twenty soldiers, one company, three companies entered into a foreign country - THIS IS NOT A WAR! These are soldiers

      But at least the branch - what is it called in the official language? And then why are the insignia removed?
      1. Igarr
        Igarr 5 March 2014 09: 24
        +1
        Why the insignia is removed - I have no information.
        So this is an airsoft team. May be.
        Or - a sports team. On shooting in ammunition. Probably.
        What kind of questions.
        When you (Israel) had to extinguish the Arabs after Munich - no one bothered. Where, by whom, with what stripes. Have done. For which I like you. For decisiveness.
        When Mengele had to be bridged, huh ?, from Argentina. Dragged and did not blink an eye. No stripes, no caps. Maybe even without panties. But - fired.
        And here .... soldiers go, don’t understand what, don’t understand what. N I C E G O do not do. They stand like columns.
        A screech - Russia is fighting with Ukraine.
        Sash, is that honest?
        You are together, for honesty ....
        So tell me.
      2. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 5 March 2014 10: 48
        0
        Quote: atalef
        as it is called in the official language

        Partisan detachment named after V.V. Putin's wassat
    4. The comment was deleted.
  10. riding
    riding 5 March 2014 08: 01
    +3
    Of course, our troops in Ukraine are. Why does Putin tell the whole world about it? Does the United States admit about the presence of its soldiers and instructors, about new training among the right sector? Everything has its time. There is no need to publicly acknowledge this fact. But since in Kiev and in the USA they know about it, it means that they will think ten times whether to go to the Crimea.
    In Putin’s speech, the possibility of including new territories in the Russian Federation was not excluded (in any case, the subtext was clear). So further it is possible to wait for everyone.
    1. atalef
      atalef 5 March 2014 09: 17
      0
      Quote: koni
      Is the USA recognized about the presence of its soldiers and instructors in Kiev, about new trainings among the right sector

      Only this sector with pots on his head ran across the Maidan and with wooden shields. They shot from slingshots and threw Molotov - and here? If self-defense? Where did the advanced weapons and training come from, in two days all parts of Ukraine with their faces on the floor and disarm?
      1. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 5 March 2014 10: 49
        0
        Quote: atalef
        in two days, all parts of Ukraine face to the floor and disarm?

        Sanya, well, there’s no fat in parts, but a Ukrainian without fat, will not last more than an hour laughing
    2. The comment was deleted.
  11. LeXXSkAt
    LeXXSkAt 5 March 2014 08: 17
    +1
    Quote: atalef

    Oh, well, you just need to hang noodles, I have seen quite a bit in my life and know how to turn on my brain a bit, then tell me tales. You understand everything yourself, here it’s not the editors of the Red Star and you are not the mouthpiece of Russia Tudey- here you can tell the truth


    So this is politics .. But the line of the Russian Federation is now just that. By the way, everything is clear, you talked about relatives in Simferopol, I have relatives in Sudak and Krasnodar, and so I had to take my nephews from Sudak to Krasnodar .... Because I think that we can all include our brains and this does not mean our opinions differ that someone wants to trick you.
    1. atalef
      atalef 5 March 2014 09: 19
      0
      Quote: LeXXSkAt
      I have relatives in Sudak and Krasnodar, so I had to export my nephews from Sudak to Krasnodar

      By the way, how in Sudak? The right sector and got there?
      Talking the truth, GDP said about * unknown militias * or not
      1. LeXXSkAt
        LeXXSkAt 5 March 2014 09: 41
        +1
        In Sudak, as in 2000, the Tatars were a little naughty ... On the way from the New World to Sudak, the widow of an intruder with two children was caught by a guy’s face, he stood up, the girl managed to escape it was in December ... At the beginning of February they came to visit and promised a red rooster. This, of course, is not the right sector, but also unpleasant, so what I have is that in the Crimea self-defense units appeared, the mood only rose.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  12. biglow
    biglow 5 March 2014 08: 21
    +1
    I read Bender’s sites yesterday, I wanted to understand why they were so mad about Crimea, they won’t take it for anyone, and after Putin’s speech everything became clear ... The thing is that the most combat-ready units and armaments remained in Crimea in Ukraine all appearances simply do not exist ... That’s the whole reason Bendera’s people don’t need Crimea and the army that stayed there, including the Marines from Feodosia who promised to remain neutral and think about what they should do to relocate to Ukraine or stay in Crimea
  13. LeXXSkAt
    LeXXSkAt 5 March 2014 08: 31
    0
    Quote: Alexander Romanov
    Quote: LeXXSkAt
    Officially, this is Crimean self-defense, but the fact that they were equipped with the Russian Federation, well, what did people ask for help and helped them.

    Who are you now hanging noodles on my ears, me? And they also bought tigers with numbers 21, trucks with numbers 90 and 76. Probably, self-defense units drove to the Urals for 76 cars.


    Alexander who they really are not important, it is important how they are now positioned. And they are positioned as the Crimean self-defense equipped with the Russian Federation. And what about noodles? Our official position is that we did not enter the troops, that’s all I tried to tell you.
    1. atalef
      atalef 5 March 2014 09: 21
      0
      Quote: LeXXSkAt
      And they are positioned as the Crimean self-defense equipped with the Russian Federation. And what about noodles?

      Only despite the fact that they are members of the armed forces of the Russian Federation — do you know what the armed forces of another state are called on the territory of a sovereign state — blocking military units and authorities? Yes, even without insignia?
      1. LeXXSkAt
        LeXXSkAt 5 March 2014 09: 33
        0
        They call themselves self-defense forces - a fact. There are no insignia of the RF Armed Forces - a fact. Maybe it's Sun. Papua new Guinea ??? So they also do not recognize ...
        1. atalef
          atalef 5 March 2014 09: 41
          0
          Quote: LeXXSkAt
          . There are no insignia of the RF Armed Forces - a fact. Could it be Sun Papua New Guinea ??

          What if it’s the Americans? belay
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. Alexander Romanov
            Alexander Romanov 5 March 2014 10: 56
            0
            Quote: atalef
            What if it’s the Americans?
            Blackwaters, or whatever it is now, also exists, but so far they are running around to other cities. Here they laid out the video, it’s purely a delta. Here they are also without a distinction
        2. atalef
          atalef 5 March 2014 09: 41
          0
          Quote: LeXXSkAt
          . There are no insignia of the RF Armed Forces - a fact. Could it be Sun Papua New Guinea ??

          What if it’s the Americans? belay
          1. LeXXSkAt
            LeXXSkAt 5 March 2014 09: 43
            0
            But what's the difference even though the Indians ... The order is supported and good.
      2. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 5 March 2014 10: 52
        0
        Quote: atalef
        Do you know what the armed forces of another state are called on the territory of a sovereign state - blocking military units and authorities?

        Sanya, considering how a soldier of this country in Crimea meets people and the number of flags on the streets, they are liberators.
        1. atalef
          atalef 5 March 2014 11: 52
          0
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          Sanya, considering how a soldier of this country in Crimea meets people and the number of flags on the streets, they are liberators.

          Sanya, I have no doubt that Crimea should be Russian and the people there have never identified themselves with Ukraine. I have not only relatives there, I served in the Crimea.
          But all this does not dismiss fact as aggression. and lies - first of all to their own citizens. There is no and there was not (in Crimea) the right sector, in Kiev (you know my father-in-law and mother-in-law there) everything is calm for a long time. Nobody robs, does not kill, and does not prohibit the Russian language.
          All this lies, primarily for Russian ears. everyone else knows how and what in fact.
          1. Alexander Romanov
            Alexander Romanov 5 March 2014 11: 57
            0
            Quote: atalef

            Sanya, I have no doubt that Crimea should be Russian

            Do you think I'm against it laughing
            Quote: atalef
            . Nobody robs, does not kill, and does not prohibit the Russian language.

            Here many write and from Kiev there is, not everything is as smooth as you say. Let the mother-in-law call the cops wink
        2. The comment was deleted.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  14. Riperbahn
    Riperbahn 5 March 2014 08: 31
    +6
    GDP does not lie - it makes politics. And makes the methods adopted precisely in politics. If you play this game, then you need to play by the rules, like all other dancers of this Marlezon ballet !!! And do not tear the vest on your chest and fall into tears of sympathy for the fraternal people! Flies separately, cutlets, respectively. I'm not a great fan of Putin, but IMHO - he did everything right. Minus one.
    1. atalef
      atalef 5 March 2014 11: 58
      0
      Quote: Riperbahn
      GDP doesn't lie - it makes politics

      The second President of Ukraine (1994-2005) Leonid Kuchma once again discussed by telephone the problems of resolving the current situation around Ukraine with the President of the Republic of Belarus Alexander Lukashenko. The latter spoke out for the territorial integrity of Ukraine, according to the press service of the charitable organization Leonid Kuchma's Presidential Fund "Ukraine".

      “The leader of the neighboring state unambiguously confirmed the position of his country: Belarus speaks out for the territorial integrity of Ukraine. The solution to all complex internal political and international problems must be found only peacefully. Lukashenko also said that he intends to express such a position on Wednesday during a trilateral meeting of the Presidents of the Republic of Belarus. Of the Russian Federation and Kazakhstan in Moscow, "the message says.


      Lukoshenko understands what it is about, in Belarus there are quite a few Russians - what if tomorrow they will not be happy? Lukashenko nowhere to run laughing
    2. atalef
      atalef 5 March 2014 11: 58
      0
      Quote: Riperbahn
      GDP doesn't lie - it makes politics

      The second President of Ukraine (1994-2005) Leonid Kuchma once again discussed by telephone the problems of resolving the current situation around Ukraine with the President of the Republic of Belarus Alexander Lukashenko. The latter spoke out for the territorial integrity of Ukraine, according to the press service of the charitable organization Leonid Kuchma's Presidential Fund "Ukraine".

      “The leader of the neighboring state unambiguously confirmed the position of his country: Belarus speaks out for the territorial integrity of Ukraine. The solution to all complex internal political and international problems must be found only peacefully. Lukashenko also said that he intends to express such a position on Wednesday during a trilateral meeting of the Presidents of the Republic of Belarus. Of the Russian Federation and Kazakhstan in Moscow, "the message says.


      Lukoshenko understands what it is about, in Belarus there are quite a few Russians - what if tomorrow they will not be happy? Lukashenko nowhere to run laughing
  15. Igmail
    Igmail 5 March 2014 10: 11
    +1
    Quote: Igarr
    Like, do not like Putin ....
    Finish rotten bazaar - what for lying? Let's tell the truth ...
    Let's.
    Did you see Keri on the Maidan yesterday? Seen it. Did you hear what he was saying? Heard.
    So why aren’t you screaming that he is lying, and Alexander?
    Ten, twenty soldiers, one company, three companies entered into a foreign country - THIS IS NOT A WAR! These are the soldiers.
    And here is the tactical unit for BU introduced in another country - this is PRECEDENT.
    The tactical unit is the battalion.
    It is necessary to separate one from the other. And to understand what lies and what doesn’t.
    US strengthened embassy security in Kiev? Well, at least there was information. Why aren’t we screaming - did the Americans send troops? And what we, as normal people, understand - it is necessary, they protect themselves.
    We alone, damn it, dohren honest ......
    I put big and fat on world opinion. A. Romanov - not so long ago he himself spoke about the same thing.
    Let Putin lie to their eyes fifty times, and even spit - I will only welcome you.
    Because he stands for Russia. And not for some kind of truth, mythical.
    The truth is where we are. I will stand on that.
    .
    But inside the country - it’s another matter.

    Similar to +++++
  16. LeXXSkAt
    LeXXSkAt 5 March 2014 10: 48
    0
    Quote: Alexander Romanov
    Quote: atalef
    . Why should the Russians lie?

    And hell knows. I generally got the impression that Putin, giving interviews to our media, actually spoke to the media of the West. Otherwise, I can’t explain all this insanity.

    But how could it be otherwise ... He could not say exactly what our partners so desire to hear from him. And since he answered, there’s nothing to get to the bottom of the matter.
  17. Ross
    Ross 5 March 2014 11: 25
    0
    Quote: elmi
    Quote: mojohed2012
    I saw in YouTube a video of the Ukrainian program Schuster, in which this comrade ranted in the presence of spectator students of Ukrainian universities, who hardly have any idea of ​​the situation in the country and clearly can not mind.
    So, this man several times argued that Ukraine and the Russian Federation are at war and there are already clashes that the Russians annexed Crimea and that the Russian media are not objective. I read the oath of Hypocrates converted to the oath of a journalist.

    Such figures should be banned from entering Russia, you look at others, these measures should be sobering because he used to work in Russia for sure with time hopes to return. But somehow we quickly forgive anti-Russian attacks, I mean when Verka Serdyuchka sang an anti-Russian song at Eurovision. We were indignant for about a year, threatened not to let him perform in Russia, but as a result, everything was forgotten and he still rakes money here.

    It was not in vain that he and Kiselyov were transferred to Ukraine. Appreciated chain dog provocateurs.
  18. Shefango
    Shefango 5 March 2014 12: 21
    0
    Young people are zombified. They were brainwashed for 20 years. From the very beginning, television channels praised only the Maidan. Any television materials are served mounted to whitewash the Western proteges. And we get aggressive as a result in previously quiet areas of Kiev:

    [media=http://www.yapfiles.ru/show/816813/ecc753562a4e64310e7ab2d48301f65a.flv.h
    tml]
  19. yvk-evg
    yvk-evg 8 March 2014 13: 22
    0
    Saying: "At least piss in the eyes - all God's dew!" - Russian. So ours must act in accordance with this old saying! In everything !!! Especially with the West, which has been behaving in the same way for a long time, but without such a long-established folk wisdom (perhaps this proverb was formed in Russia after close contacts with the West). So there are no Russian troops in Crimea - and even with ... look in the eyes - everything is God's dew !!! And the locals took the "Tigers" for a ride from the Russian marines (not for free - all a penny in the regimental treasury) - and even with ... look in the eyes - all God's dew !!! ETC.
  20. TurboSloN
    TurboSloN 9 March 2014 21: 46
    0
    You guys want to minus me, if you want to tell me that I am wrong, that I am a "putinophil", but I will express my opinion ... At all times when Russia was faced with grandiose, insurmountable enemies and circumstances, Turks, Swedes, French, fascists
    Stskaya Germany ... Always at the "helm" was a charismatic and worthy leader, and in our time this leader is Vladimir Putin, whatever one may say, this is a person who is ready to respond with an action for every word ... minus.