Military Review

Of the Russian Federation in the UN: Yanukovych asked Putin to engage the Russian troops in Ukraine

132
President of Ukraine Viktor Yanukovych appealed to the Russian authorities to use their armed forces to ensure constitutional order in his country. This was stated by the Permanent Representative of the Russian Federation to the UN Vitaly Churkin, speaking on Monday, 3 in March, at an open meeting of the Security Council on the situation in Ukraine.


Churkin read a letter from Yanukovich, dated March 1, to Security Council members. He, in particular, writes that "the events on Maidan, the illegal seizure of power in Kiev led to the fact that Ukraine was on the verge of a civil war." "In this regard, I appeal to Russian President Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin with a request to use the armed forces of the Russian Federation to restore law, peace, law and order, stability and protection of the population of Ukraine" (quoted in ITAR-TASS).

After that, Churkin showed members of the Security Council a photocopy of the original appeal of Yanukovych.

Addressing Security Council members, Churkin stressed: Russia calls on Western countries to take a responsible approach to the situation in Ukraine, postponing geopolitical calculations, and be guided by the interests of the Ukrainian people.

According to the diplomat, “those who try to interpret the situation almost as aggression threaten with all sorts of sanctions and boycotts” are the same countries that “consistently and persistently encouraged political forces close to them to ultimatums and refusal of dialogue, to ignore the concerns of the south and eastern Ukraine, and ultimately to the polarization of Ukrainian society. "

The diplomat stressed that the Russian position on the situation in the neighboring country "was and remains consistently open." "If for some Western politicians, Ukraine is only a territory of a geopolitical game, then for us it is a fraternal country with which we are associated with a common centuries-old history"he said, adding that Russia is interested in a stable and strong Ukraine, in which" the legal rights and interests of Ukrainians, our compatriots and all citizens are ensured. "

"In the extraordinary situation that has developed through no fault of our own, when the life and safety of the inhabitants of Crimea and the southeastern regions are in real danger because of the irresponsible and provocative actions of Bandera and other ultranationalist elements, we would like to emphasize once again that Russia's actions are completely adequate and legitimate "- said the diplomat.

An example of US actions in Grenada

At the same time, according to Churkin, Russia will not allow the repetition of events in the Crimea in central Ukraine and other regions of the country. “Do you really think that Russia can allow the repetition of what was in central Ukraine in these regions? In eastern, southern Ukraine and in the Crimea, where millions of Russians live?” - He turned to the audience at the meeting.

He recalled that in 1983, the United States had deployed troops to Grenada. "At the same time, President (Ronald) Reagan said that the United States protects American citizens who live there. There are one thousand people there. And there was no threat from the Grenadian authorities. And we have millions of citizens in Crimea who fear such atrocities "- said the permanent representative of the Russian Federation.

At the Security Council meeting, Western countries, including the United States, Britain, France, and with them Ukraine, stated that Russia's fears about the fate of the Russian-speaking population of Crimea cannot serve as an excuse for activating the armed forces on the peninsula.

The permanent representative of Ukraine, Yuriy Sergeev, declared on behalf of the Russian-speaking community of the country that he does not feel any threat and does not see the need for conducting "peacekeeping operations."

Russia insists on returning to February 21 agreements

Russia insists that in order to resolve the situation in Ukraine, it is necessary to return to the agreements from February 21, the Permanent Representative of the Russian Federation said at a UN Security Council meeting.

"It is necessary to ensure the fulfillment of the obligations enshrined in the agreement of 21 February, including the beginning of the process of constitutional reform with the participation and full consideration of all regions of Ukraine," Churkin said, according to Interfax.

At the same time, Churkin noted that this reform subsequently "must be approved at a national referendum in order to form a legitimate government of national unity, taking into account all political forces and regions of the country."

US Permanent Representative: Russia Has Alternative Alternatives to Military Intervention

The possible military intervention of Russia in the situation in Ukraine may indicate that Moscow does not intend to resolve the Ukrainian crisis through diplomacy, said US Permanent Representative to the UN Samantha Power at a meeting of the World Organization’s Security Council.

“When a military operation seems to be the main way to resolve such a crisis situation, it’s hard not to come to the conclusion that Russia does not want peace and a diplomatic solution,” she said, as Interfax reports.

At the same time, Power noted that "Russia has a large number of opportunities to protect the Russian-speaking population (in Ukraine), in addition to military intervention."

"Why does Russia not support international mediators? Why does it not support the idea of ​​sending a mission of international observers? Why not enter into direct negotiations with the Ukrainian authorities who want to resolve this crisis peacefully?" - asked Power.

The US insists that so far there is no evidence that the population of Crimea is threatened by the new Ukrainian authorities, the US Permanent Representative to the UN continued. "Military intervention cannot be justified by non-existent threats," Power said. According to her, "the mobilization of the Russian military is a response to a fictional threat."

The UN Security Council has already met twice in connection with the situation in Ukraine last week. On Friday, the members of the Security Council held a closed meeting, and on Saturday they held discussions in open mode. Both times, the permanent representative of Ukraine to the UN, Yuri Sergeyev, was invited.
Originator:
http://www.newsru.com/world/04mar2014/pismo.html
132 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. MolGro
    MolGro 4 March 2014 06: 37 New
    23

    Let the general people go through the forest !!
    1. mirag2
      mirag2 4 March 2014 06: 46 New
      +8
      And who asked to send troops to Poland:
      1. bomg.77
        bomg.77 4 March 2014 06: 58 New
        +6
        Quote: mirag2
        And who asked to send troops to Poland:
        The Poles have quieted down, but the Americans are twisting into the Black Sea.
        US Navy may enter the Black Sea
        We are talking about the nuclear carrier “George W. Bush” and the escort group of 16 ships and three nuclear submarines
        A group of ships of the 6-th fleet of the United States entered the Turkish straits. About this on his Facebook page wrote the head of the Center for Military-Political Studies Dmitry Tymchuk.
        We are talking about the newest nuclear aircraft carrier George W. Bush and the escort group of 16 surface ships and three nuclear submarines. Unofficially, the flotilla enters from the Aegean into the Dardanelles.

        It is expected that on March 7 the group will begin the passage of the Bosphorus and access to the operational expanse of the Black Sea. Ahead of the flotilla is one of the destroyers.

        Earlier it was reported that the Taylor missile frigate and the Mount Whitney control ship of the 6 fleet entered the waters of the Black Sea. According to the Montreux Convention, they were obliged to leave the Black Sea waters before the end of February.
        1. Name
          Name 4 March 2014 07: 15 New
          +4
          Quote: bomg.77
          US Navy may enter the Black Sea

          Sorry for Fenya: clumsy pont ... bully
        2. Tersky
          Tersky 4 March 2014 07: 17 New
          +6
          Quote: bomg.77
          The Poles have quieted down, but the Americans are twisting into the Black Sea.

          WASHINGTON, 4 MAR - RIA Novosti, Peter Martynychev. The U.S. Department of Defense is suspending cooperation with the Russian military in connection with events in Ukraine, Pentagon spokesman John Kirby told reporters. US forces in Europe and the Mediterranean remain at their locations, Kirby said.
          "Some media speculate about the possible direction of ships to the region. There were no changes in the deployment of our troops in Europe and the Mediterranean. Our Navy continues daily, previously planned operations and exercises with allies and partners in the region.", - he said.
          RIA News Alex, hi !
          1. bomg.77
            bomg.77 4 March 2014 07: 34 New
            +1
            Quote: Tersky
            The US military in Europe and the Mediterranean Sea remains at their locations, Kirby said.
            Tersky hi they then say a lot that I can, the one who believes them)) the Poles are pulling up armored vehicles. I understand the Ponts, but still! There are a lot of infa and everyone is lying, his head is spinning!
        3. both s69
          both s69 4 March 2014 07: 18 New
          +3
          Quote: bomg.77
          US Navy may enter the Black Sea
          We are talking about the nuclear carrier “George W. Bush” and the escort group of 16 ships and three nuclear submarines
          A group of ships of the 6-th fleet of the United States entered the Turkish straits. About this on his Facebook page wrote the head of the Center for Military-Political Studies Dmitry Tymchuk.
          We are talking about the newest nuclear aircraft carrier George W. Bush and the escort group of 16 surface ships and three nuclear submarines. Unofficially, the flotilla enters from the Aegean into the Dardanelles.

          It is expected that on March 7 the group will begin the passage of the Bosphorus and access to the operational expanse of the Black Sea. Ahead of the flotilla is one of the destroyers.

          Earlier it was reported that the Taylor missile frigate and the Mount Whitney control ship of the 6 fleet entered the waters of the Black Sea. According to the Montreux Convention, they were obliged to leave the Black Sea waters before the end of February.

          Wait for the "guests" - edrena louse!
          Now what? Tactical Aviation - Readiness # 1? request
        4. Nayhas
          Nayhas 4 March 2014 07: 24 New
          +9
          Quote: bomg.77
          US Navy may enter the Black Sea
          We are talking about the nuclear carrier “George W. Bush” and the escort group of 16 ships and three nuclear submarines

          Stupidity. Turks will not let them through the straits. Throughout history, not a single aircraft carrier passed Turkish straits, by the way, this is the answer to the question why the USSR did not build aircraft carriers, it was possible to build only in Ukraine, and it could not be brought out of the Black Sea. Negotiations on Kuznetsov for a very long time were convincing that Kuzya was not an aircraft carrier, but a cruiser. Even on the Varangian there were problems, the Turks did not want to let him out either.
          1. bomg.77
            bomg.77 4 March 2014 07: 42 New
            0
            Quote: Nayhas
            Stupidity.
            Eugene hi Is there an agreement on the prohibition of the atom in the Black Sea?
            1. Nayhas
              Nayhas 4 March 2014 08: 28 New
              +1
              Quote: bomg.77
              Eugene hi Is there an agreement on the prohibition of the atom across the Black Sea?

              I don’t know, there is a Turkish ban on the passage of ships from nuclear power plants in any direction, but who will prevent us from operating ships with such a power plant in the Black Sea? It will not go beyond the Black Sea alone, therefore there is no point in this ...
            2. alone
              alone 4 March 2014 19: 28 New
              0
              Quote: bomg.77
              Eugene Is there an agreement on the prohibition of the atom across the Black Sea?

              There is an agreement that Russia, the United States and Great Britain are the guarantor countries for the security and territorial integrity of the Ukrainian Republic. For this, the Ukrainians abandoned the nuclear arsenal. Budapest accords. Now I think it is clear why the ACG goes to the Black Sea.
          2. alex-s
            alex-s 4 March 2014 09: 06 New
            +6
            It’s a pity that at one time we did not press the Turks! Now we would control the straits ourselves! winked
            1. stroporez
              stroporez 4 March 2014 11: 12 New
              +2
              Quote: alex-s
              It’s a pity that at one time we did not press the Turks! Now we would control the straits ourselves!
              --17 km did not reach ..............
        5. demel2
          demel2 4 March 2014 07: 25 New
          +3
          Quote: bomg.77
          Head of the Center for Military-Political Studies Dmitry Tymchuk.

          A source trustworthy? What fairy tales alone are not told, visionaries, are being bullshit, dear.
          1. bomg.77
            bomg.77 4 March 2014 07: 38 New
            0
            Quote: demel2
            A source worthy of respect?
            I’m counting on the fact that experts will dispel this duck!
        6. Per se.
          Per se. 4 March 2014 07: 40 New
          +6
          Quote: bomg.77
          US Navy May Enter Black SeaIt is about George W. Bush nuclear carrier and 16 escort group and three nuclear submarines
          A U.S. aircraft carrier, especially an atomic one, cannot enter the Black Sea. This will be a gross violation of all agreements on the straits, and in fact mean declaring war on Russia. The fact that the United States has long been a country of Satan, as well as the fact that the UN seems to be repeating the fate of the League of Nations, is a fact from which to draw conclusions. It is urgent to end the rebels in Kiev, otherwise they will already ask for military assistance from NATO. The duplicity and meanness of the West, when any gangster will be an advocate of freedom and democracy, is evident in Kosovo and Syria, so that the Bandera Nazis are friends and brothers for the United States.
      2. Name
        Name 4 March 2014 06: 59 New
        14
        Poland does not move without a command from the owners, and since Poland is a MEMBER laughing NATO, then crossing the border of Ukraine, the Polish Armed Forces untie the arms of RUSSIA ... will the Poles go to this ... repeat
        1. Tersky
          Tersky 4 March 2014 07: 20 New
          11
          Quote: name
          times Poland is a NATO MEMBER

          You are mistaken, Poland is a NATO circle ...
          1. Name
            Name 4 March 2014 07: 45 New
            +7
            Quote: Tersky
            You are mistaken, Poland is a NATO circle ...

            So, if I express my opinion about Poland .... it will not work, however, according to the ethical standards of the site, I have to "pervert" ..
        2. AVIATOR36662
          AVIATOR36662 4 March 2014 07: 40 New
          11
          The Poles can only go to Kh. Since the legitimate president of Ukraine (Yanukovych) has already asked Russia to send Russian troops into Ukraine. Our obvious victorious march through Ukraine (the offensive) and their obvious shameful flight do not smile at them, so they will be just loud hiss at home in Polonia.
        3. stroporez
          stroporez 4 March 2014 11: 15 New
          +1
          Quote: name
          ... will the Poles go to this?
          - they will become ........ there is such a Polish disease ----------- when the laver turns on ambition, then the brain completely turns off ......
      3. VADEL
        VADEL 4 March 2014 07: 03 New
        +4
        Is it those cracked from Iraq painted? laughing
      4. stroporez
        stroporez 4 March 2014 11: 06 New
        0
        Quote: mirag2
        And who asked to send troops to Poland
        well ........ they are, as it were, among the "universal people", so they think they can .....
    2. Horde
      Horde 4 March 2014 06: 49 New
      +4
      President of Ukraine Viktor Yanukovych asked the Russian authorities to use his armed forces to ensure constitutional order in his country.


      Yanukovych, who didn’t want to give an order to use force now means he decided that Putin should do this? YANUKOVU-ANATHEMA for such things, politician th.
      Now the troops of Russia must disperse both Bandera and the Russian separatists and return Ukraine on a silver platter with a blue border to Yanukovych?
      1. Semen Semyonitch
        Semen Semyonitch 4 March 2014 07: 41 New
        +2
        Quote: Horde
        Now the troops of Russia must disperse both Bandera and the Russian separatists and return Ukraine on a silver platter with a blue border to Yanukovych?


        Why do you think so?
      2. Hudo
        Hudo 4 March 2014 07: 46 New
        +3
        Quote: Horde
        Now the troops of Russia must disperse both Bandera and the Russian separatists and return Ukraine on a silver platter with a blue border to Yanukovych?

        Russia is not going to return Yanukovych to power
        [March 4, 2014 | 02:42]

        The Russian side doubts that Viktor Yanukovych will be able to return to power, said Vitaly Churkin, Permanent Representative of the Russian Federation to the UN.

        "Our task is not to return Yanukovych to power, we understand that he will not return to power and will not rule the state, although we believe that at the moment he is the legitimate president of Ukraine," he told the UN Security Council, report "News."

        http://zadonbass.org/news/all/message_77186
        1. alone
          alone 4 March 2014 19: 32 New
          0
          "Our task is not to return Yanukovych to power, we understand that he will not return to power and will not rule the state, although we believe that at the moment he is the legitimate president of Ukraine," he told the UN Security Council,

          what Where is his Majesty the Logic? Can someone explain to me what this means? According to Churkin, Russia has fulfilled the request of President Yanukovych, has sent troops, but Yanukovych will not be able to rule Ukraine anymore and will not return to power.

          Could the Foreign Ministry come up with anything else? Don’t be offended of course, but it all looks ridiculous and illogical !!
    3. Dyatko Nebatko
      Dyatko Nebatko 4 March 2014 07: 30 New
      0
      Right! Get over there!
    4. Dyatko Nebatko
      Dyatko Nebatko 4 March 2014 07: 31 New
      +1
      Indeed, son of a bitch, painted a flag !!! laughing
  2. dmitrij.blyuz
    dmitrij.blyuz 4 March 2014 06: 40 New
    16
    emphasized Power. "" Maybe she’ll give her a marker? As usual, everything under and the mattresses squeal off-topic. Although Churkin and don’t get used to “cutting” their verbal respect for him! One is fighting against the unbridled spite of the ghouls.
  3. Name
    Name 4 March 2014 06: 42 New
    +8
    The first lines of the article:"President of Ukraine Viktor Yanukovych asked the Russian authorities to use his armed forces to ensure constitutional order in his country."-prove that Russia's actions are adequate in the current situation. hi . And it will corner the whole BIOMASS FROM Amerikosov.
  4. Potin
    Potin 4 March 2014 06: 43 New
    +6
    It would be nice to remind them of Kuzkin’s mother.
    1. Semen Semyonitch
      Semen Semyonitch 4 March 2014 07: 39 New
      +3
      Quote: Potin
      It would be nice to remind them of Kuzkin’s mother.


      Wait ... your mom .... Wait ... your mother laughing
  5. shyler
    shyler 4 March 2014 06: 47 New
    +9
    Churkin always pleased with his straightforward and accurate statements. But after 08, after Syria, the UN seems to me to have completely lost its objectivity!
    1. Penzuck
      Penzuck 4 March 2014 07: 19 New
      +2
      There was such an organization, the League of Nations, which existed after the First World War and before the Second World War, to explain why and who destroyed it?

      PS: And if you do not understand, then the UN is an organization in which it is possible by lawful international agreements to besiege the presumptuous hooligan of the USA.
      1. Tersky
        Tersky 4 March 2014 07: 27 New
        10
        Quote: Penzuck
        And if you do not understand, then the UN is an organization in which it is possible by lawful international agreements to besiege the presumptuous US hooligan.

        In this "organization," only Papuans can call for liability for the illegal collection of coconuts on a neighboring island.
      2. Semen Semyonitch
        Semen Semyonitch 4 March 2014 07: 37 New
        +3
        Quote: Penzuck
        PS: And if you do not understand, then the UN is an organization in which it is possible by lawful international agreements to besiege the presumptuous hooligan of the USA.


        Mixed up nothing?
      3. Walk
        Walk 4 March 2014 09: 25 New
        +4
        Only recently, the UN is more and more like a US attorney. Trying to come up with "legitimate" excuses for their "pranks."
      4. abrakadabre
        abrakadabre 4 March 2014 11: 51 New
        +2
        The UN is an organization in which it is possible by lawful international agreements to besiege the presumptuous US
        To do this, you must first move the UN headquarters somewhere from the United States. It is best to build in neutral waters such as a giant oil platform or a town from such platforms. So that the territory does not belong to any country.
    2. seller trucks
      seller trucks 4 March 2014 07: 23 New
      10
      Quote: shyler
      But after the 08 year, after Syria, the UN seems to me to have completely lost its objectivity!


      that I beg you, what objectivity, in the organization where the votes are bought for glass beads. You would still remember the Hague court. "universal values" apply only to the powers that be.
    3. demel2
      demel2 4 March 2014 07: 32 New
      +5
      Quote: shyler
      , after Syria, the UN seems to me to have lost all objectivity!

      The UN has lost not only objectivity and authority much earlier than Syria, which Yugoslavia is worth.
      1. Penzuck
        Penzuck 4 March 2014 10: 37 New
        0
        I beg you, the UN and the UN Security Council are two different things, the first "rabble of the Papuans," as you put it, and the second world elite. Or do you think that the legal successor of the USSR does not have superpower status, or did you decide to review the results of the Second World War? Russia is beginning to win diplomatically lost positions LEGALLY, and not like a certain Adolf Schickelgruber, in the common people of Hitler. I dare to notice the Hague trial of Milosevic when Russia was weak, let them now try to convict someone.
        1. Tersky
          Tersky 4 March 2014 18: 48 New
          +1
          Quote: Penzuck
          I dare to notice the Hague trial of Milosevic when Russia was weak, let them now try to convict someone.

          Well, not really? Where to hide Libya? Iraq? Georgia? You quickly forgot the barking of the West with the tacit consent of the tacitly-pleasing consent of the UN Security Council. Contradict yourself, the UN and the UN Security Council should not depend on how strong or weak this or that state is. In the meantime, the UN goes on as a whore, who pays more, he dances. Or do you recall the corruption scandal at the UN in 2005?
  6. ia-ai00
    ia-ai00 4 March 2014 06: 56 New
    20
    ... Western countries, the USA, Great Britain, France, and with them Ukraine, stated that the fears of the Russian Federation about the fate of the Russian-speaking population of Crimea cannot serve as an excuse for activating the armed forces on the peninsula.

    In 1983, the United States sent troops to Grenada. "At the same time, President (Ronald) Reagan said that the United States is protecting the American citizens who live there. There are one thousand people there.

    There are no words ... So, because of one thousand people, the introduction of troops is a justifiable measure, and a threat to millions of people can’t serve as an excuse ... JUDAH. I do not understand how these "partners" manage to be blind and deaf to someone else's pain, whose eyes are thirsty, to spoil Russia as much as possible, even DOCUMENTAL facts - they DO NOT SEE at point blank range, DO NOT WANT TO RECOGNIZE. Any NIT will be planted on Bozhnichka and protect her in order to bring to the end the conceived meanness.
    1. Nayhas
      Nayhas 4 March 2014 07: 25 New
      -13
      Quote: ia-ai00
      No words ...

      It is strange to hear this from a citizen of Kazakhstan ...
      1. Semen Semyonitch
        Semen Semyonitch 4 March 2014 07: 36 New
        +5
        Quote: Nayhas
        It is strange to hear this from a citizen of Kazakhstan ...

        ************************
        And what so confuses you in his position?
        1. Nayhas
          Nayhas 4 March 2014 08: 35 New
          +1
          Quote: Semen Semenych
          And what so confuses you in his position?

          On the topic of Ukraine, the forums in Kazakhstan are categorically anti-Russian. Having a large Russian population in the northern regions, the Kazakhs are trying on the situation in Crimea for themselves. Moreover, Kazakhstan is sandwiched between Russia and China and there are fears that Russia will take the north, and China the southern regions. Of course you can laugh at it, but that’s not funny for them. Analyzing the situation in Ukraine, everyone usually looks at messages from Russia, Europe and the USA, while skipping the frank silence of our allies in the CU of Kazakhstan and Belarus ...
          1. ia-ai00
            ia-ai00 4 March 2014 08: 48 New
            11
            On the topic of Ukraine, the forums in Kazakhstan are categorically anti-Russian.

            Many of my employees, Kazakhs, fathers or grandfathers fought with the Nazis, they have the same attitude towards unbridled Banderaism as NORMAL people, and they can write comments and provocateurs on forums.
          2. Clegg
            Clegg 4 March 2014 09: 13 New
            +2
            Quote: Nayhas
            Moreover, Kazakhstan is sandwiched between Russia and China and there are fears that Russia will take the north, and China the southern regions.

            The most pessimistic scenario

            Quote: Nayhas
            It is strange to hear this from a citizen of Kazakhstan.

            She's Russian

            Quote: Nayhas
            at the same time they miss the frank silence of our allies in the CU of Kazakhstan

            Last week there was a meeting of the Security Council of the Republic of Kazakhstan. One can only guess what they were talking about.
          3. Semen Semyonitch
            Semen Semyonitch 4 March 2014 10: 00 New
            +3
            Your position is clearly one-sided. For no reason Russia made a decision on the POSSIBLE troop entry? Or were there good reasons for this? And, I repeat, with whom the Crimeans should be their personal and sovereign right.
      2. andrey_kz
        andrey_kz 4 March 2014 08: 52 New
        +7
        Only yesterday I recalled Grenada, as far as I remember there locals piled on a drunken crowd of students from the United States, and this served as a reason for the landing and the displacement of power.
        It is strange to hear this from a citizen of Kazakhstan ... [/ quote]
        And how are we different from the rest? And there are Nazis here, yesterday they tried to arrange a rally against the Russian troop deployment. But Kazakhstan is not Ukraine, they were quickly transported by polite comrades.
        1. Clegg
          Clegg 4 March 2014 09: 09 New
          0
          Quote: andrey_kz
          And here there are the Nazis, yesterday they tried to arrange a rally against the Russian deployment of troops.

          Is this Mukhtar Taizhan a Nazi?
  7. major071
    major071 4 March 2014 06: 58 New
    20
    Oh, Americans churkin poked his nose into Grenada, reminded that they never paid attention to other countries, but always applied everything that they needed, and not others. Already tired of these arrogant Saxons.
    1. Nayhas
      Nayhas 4 March 2014 07: 28 New
      -17
      Quote: major071
      Oh, Americans churkin poked his nose into Grenada, reminded that they never paid attention to other countries, but always applied everything that they needed, and not others. Already tired of these arrogant Saxons.

      Well, in addition to GRENADA, the United States has a lot of facts of getting into other people's affairs, here are Iraq and Afghanistan, and Serbia, and Panama ... BUT. Climbing somewhere, the United States did not annex the alien territory. The state remained sovereign within the same borders.
      1. Semen Semyonitch
        Semen Semyonitch 4 March 2014 07: 34 New
        13
        Quote: Nayhas
        Climbing somewhere, the United States did not annex the alien territory.


        Is Russia annexing something?
        1. Nayhas
          Nayhas 4 March 2014 08: 38 New
          +1
          Quote: Semen Semenych
          Is Russia annexing something?

          Not yet. But the question of the annexation of Crimea to Russia is already open. Yes, and read any comments on this resource, almost 99% speak for it, but for some it is almost a fait accompli. The same is true for the eastern regions of Ukraine.
          1. Semen Semyonitch
            Semen Semyonitch 4 March 2014 09: 24 New
            +7
            Quote: Nayhas
            Not yet. But the question of the annexation of Crimea to Russia is already open.



            What does it mean bye? Annexation is forcible accession, and there will be a referendum in Crimea, and if, on the basis of the free will of the people of Crimea, it becomes part of Russia (a triumph of justice, you will agree), I personally, like any patriot of my country, will not have anything against it.
            1. Clegg
              Clegg 4 March 2014 09: 31 New
              +4
              Quote: Semen Semenych
              Annexation is forcible accession,

              Annexation is the unification by a state of all or part of the territory of another state.
              1. Semen Semyonitch
                Semen Semyonitch 4 March 2014 09: 54 New
                +1
                Quote: Clegg
                Quote: Semen Semenych
                Annexation is forcible accession,

                Annexation is the unification by a state of all or part of the territory of another state.


                ... I repeat-FORCED ...
                1. Clegg
                  Clegg 4 March 2014 10: 03 New
                  -1
                  Quote: Semen Semenych
                  I repeat-FORCED ...

                  Not necessarily violent
                  1. Deniska
                    Deniska 4 March 2014 11: 58 New
                    +1
                    Clegg (2) KZ Today, 09:31 ↑ New
                    Quote: Semen Semenych
                    Annexation is forcible accession,
                    Annexation is the unification by a state of all or part of the territory of another state.


                    And in the one-way, is it not violent? Then annexation is a voluntary joining of another state.

                    France in the Second World War was annexed and then it turns out not forcibly !! ;)
                    1. Clegg
                      Clegg 4 March 2014 12: 12 New
                      0
                      Quote: Deniska
                      France in the Second World War was annexed and then it turns out not forcibly!

                      There was occupation, not annexation. You either do not understand anything or are trying to troll.
                  2. Semen Semyonitch
                    Semen Semyonitch 4 March 2014 12: 33 New
                    0
                    Quote: Clegg
                    Quote: Semen Semenych
                    I repeat-FORCED ...

                    Not necessarily violent


                    Under international law, annexation is a form of aggression. Aggression may not be violent?
                    1. Clegg
                      Clegg 4 March 2014 14: 28 New
                      0
                      Quote: Semen Semenych
                      Under international law, annexation is a form of aggression

                      not always, the example of annexation of Austria was non-violent.
          2. Midshipman
            Midshipman 4 March 2014 09: 32 New
            +6
            Question to whom is open? If the inhabitants of Crimea want it, why not? Forcibly Russia will not join anyone, and giving people the opportunity to self-determination is a holy thing. The same applies to the eastern regions.
          3. demon184
            demon184 4 March 2014 10: 01 New
            +1
            Ukraine itself must voluntarily return the Crimea to Russia, as it once received it.
            1. Clegg
              Clegg 4 March 2014 10: 09 New
              0
              Quote: demon184
              Ukraine itself must voluntarily return the Crimea to Russia, as it once received it.

              North Kazakhstan do not want?
          4. Deniska
            Deniska 4 March 2014 11: 55 New
            0
            Are you against the accession of Crimea and South-East of Ukraine? With their consent without pressure from Russia?
            1. Clegg
              Clegg 4 March 2014 12: 15 New
              0
              Quote: Deniska
              Are you against the accession of Crimea and South-East of Ukraine? With their consent without pressure from Russia?

              I am for territorial integrity and respect for the principles of international law.
              1. Semen Semyonitch
                Semen Semyonitch 4 March 2014 12: 36 New
                +1
                Quote: Clegg
                Quote: Deniska
                Are you against the accession of Crimea and South-East of Ukraine? With their consent without pressure from Russia?

                I am for territorial integrity and respect for the principles of international law.


                Autonomy has no right to decide how to live on? Is that not their right? Notice, the conversation about Donbass or Odessa is not going on ... yet ...
                1. Clegg
                  Clegg 4 March 2014 14: 33 New
                  0
                  Quote: Semen Semenych
                  Autonomy has no right to decide how to live on? E

                  If this is contrary to the Constitution of Ukraine, then yes, it does not have the right.
                  1. Semen Semyonitch
                    Semen Semyonitch 4 March 2014 17: 12 New
                    0
                    Quote: Clegg
                    Quote: Semen Semenych
                    Autonomy has no right to decide how to live on? E

                    If this is contrary to the Constitution of Ukraine, then yes, it does not have the right.


                    The very fact of the transfer of Crimea to Khrushchev can be considered not legitimate, as in the film: -Kemska volost? Yes, let him take it.

                    In the framework of the USSR, this did not practically matter. And now we have what we have. For example, would you like to fall asleep in your country, and wake up, say, in China?
                    1. Clegg
                      Clegg 4 March 2014 17: 45 New
                      0
                      Quote: Semen Semenych
                      The very fact of the transfer of Crimea to Khrushchev can be considered not legitimate, as in the film: -Kemska volost? Yes, let him take it.

                      Can you prove that the transfer was illegitimate?
                2. alone
                  alone 4 March 2014 19: 37 New
                  0
                  Quote: Semen Semenych
                  Autonomy has no right to decide how to live on?


                  No! They don’t have. Here is an article from the Crimean constitution.

                  According to Art. 1 “Status of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea, Verkhovna Rada of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the Council of Ministers of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea” The Autonomous Republic of Crimea is an integral part of Ukraine and within the powers defined by the Constitution of Ukraine, decides issues related to its jurisdiction.
                  In accordance with Article 2 of the Crimean Constitution, in the event of a conflict of provisions of the regulatory legal acts of the Verkhovna Rada of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and acts of the Council of Ministers of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea of ​​the Constitution of Ukraine, the provisions of the Constitution of Ukraine and the laws of Ukraine shall apply to the laws of Ukraine.
      2. sergey32
        sergey32 4 March 2014 07: 37 New
        12
        Tell that to the Serbs in Kosovo.
        1. Nayhas
          Nayhas 4 March 2014 08: 40 New
          -4
          Quote: sergey32
          Tell that to the Serbs in Kosovo.

          Is Kosovo the new state of the USA?
          1. Semen Semyonitch
            Semen Semyonitch 4 March 2014 09: 27 New
            +2
            Quote: Nayhas
            Quote: sergey32
            Tell that to the Serbs in Kosovo.

            Is Kosovo the new state of the USA?


            And what, there are 60% of Americans and a common border?
          2. HollyGremlin
            HollyGremlin 4 March 2014 09: 33 New
            +4
            That is, a war of annihilation, for the sake of economic gain, is much more noble and better than stabilizing the situation? I doubt that in the event of the annexation of Crimea to Russia, hemp fields will begin to be sown there and run around with machine guns. I think there will even be a bridge, and in the cities they will begin to build ice arenas at the expense of the state. The United States does not annex land, because after that it is necessary to invest money there and take into account the opinion of new citizens. Have the Americans built anything in Kosovo or in Agan, or maybe in Iraq?
            1. demon184
              demon184 4 March 2014 10: 03 New
              +2
              Military bases were built.
            2. Deniska
              Deniska 4 March 2014 12: 01 New
              +1
              The United States does not annex land, because after that it is necessary to invest money there and take into account the opinion of new citizens. Have the Americans built anything in Kosovo or in Agan, or maybe in Iraq?


              But what about !!! Military bases. bully
          3. Deniska
            Deniska 4 March 2014 12: 00 New
            0
            Unfortunately this is now do not understand what.
      3. AVIATOR36662
        AVIATOR36662 4 March 2014 07: 52 New
        +7
        When Russia existed for many centuries as a strong state, only wild Indians and bison with smelly skunks ran across the territory of today's USA. And the inhabitants of many territorial entities in Ukraine will determine in referenda where to enter and whom to send. And what is a referendum, everyone knows if literate. So Russia doesn’t take anyone by force, as is evident with Abkhazia, South Ossetia, Transnistria. Only the will of the peoples!
        1. Nayhas
          Nayhas 4 March 2014 08: 53 New
          0
          Quote: AVIATOR36662
          When Russia existed for many centuries as a strong state, only wild Indians and bison with smelly skunks ran across the territory of today's USA.

          Absolutely crazy analogy. With the same success, it can be said that while Russia did not exist and there were rabbits running along the Central Russian plain in Afghanistan, there was a powerful state, now called Sogdiana with its capital in Samarkand (then just Markand). The first mention of it dates back to the 6th century BC, but this state is still ancient. Does this mean that Afghans are superior to us?
          1. Semen Semyonitch
            Semen Semyonitch 4 March 2014 10: 13 New
            +1
            It doesn’t matter how long this or that statehood or civilization arose. It is much more important which way she went and what she gave to the world. The "powerful" state of Afghanistan remained in that century, in which hares ran across our plain. But American ideology has adopted extremely perverted forms of its own uniqueness and superiority, which we see in imposing our point of view around the world on the principle that there are two positions — one is mine, the other is wrong.
          2. Deniska
            Deniska 4 March 2014 12: 04 New
            +1
            Absolutely crazy analogy. With the same success, we can say that while Russia did not exist and hares ran across the Central Russian plain ...


            1. Etruscan language is closest to Old Slavic.
            2. The higher the caste in India, the closer the genotype to the Slavs.
            3. Read the ancient Vedas "The Book of Veles" or is the recognition by archaeologists of antiquity of these plates also absurd?
          3. 11111mail.ru
            11111mail.ru 4 March 2014 17: 20 New
            0
            Quote: Nayhas
            in Afghanistan there was a powerful state now called Sogdiana with its capital in Samarkand (then just Markand). The first mention of it dates back to the 6th century BC, but this state is still ancient. Does this mean that Afghans are superior to us?

            Does not mean! For your information:
            http://www.liveinternet.ru/community/2138116/post168904139/
            "Sogdiana is an ancient region of Central Asia, located in the Zarafshan and Kashkadarya river basins (the modern territory of Uzbekistan and partly Tajikistan)."
            http://otvet.mail.ru/question/20012252
            "Sogdiana lay north of Bactria, between Oks (Amu Darya) and Yaksart (Syr Darya), and occupied the fertile lands of the Zerafshan valley.
            Sogdian (New Sogdian) language is still in use among the small yagobi people (according to various estimates from 2 to 12 thousand speakers) in the Sogd region of Tajikistan and in the vicinity of Dushanbe. "
            Sogdiana did not have independent political significance. At some point, it included Bactria (according to the modern Paktiya in Afghanistan). So the Afghans have a very indirect attitude towards the Sogdians, which is practically reflected by the Russian proverb "their second fence is second wattle." Therefore, the conclusion: Afghans are not superior to us (expression in your format). Your example refers to the case, again defined by the Russian proverb: "heard a ring, but don’t know where he is".
      4. skifd
        skifd 4 March 2014 08: 07 New
        +4
        Quote: Nayhas
        . BUT. Climbing somewhere, the United States did not annex the alien territory. The state remained sovereign within the same borders.


        Well yes . Only more often than not getting a puppet government, essentially acquiring a suzerain in the form of the United States. If for some reason this was not necessary, the country was simply turned into a garbage dump, loading it to the limit with the so-called "democracy."
        1. Nayhas
          Nayhas 4 March 2014 08: 42 New
          -5
          Quote: skifd
          Well yes . Only more often than not getting a puppet government, essentially acquiring a suzerain in the form of the United States. If for some reason this was not necessary, the country was simply turned into a garbage dump, loading it to the limit with the so-called "democracy."

          And where are the puppet governments? In Iraq? In Afghanistan? They planted democracy there?
          1. skifd
            skifd 4 March 2014 09: 14 New
            +3
            Quote: Nayhas
            And where are the puppet governments? In Iraq? In Afghanistan? They planted democracy there?


            There is just a dump.
            Are you a "democrat" ??
          2. igor36
            igor36 4 March 2014 09: 34 New
            +5
            Quote: Nayhas
            And where are the puppet governments? In Iraq? In Afghanistan?

            That is where the puppet governments are.
          3. demon184
            demon184 4 March 2014 10: 05 New
            +1
            There, 100% of non-intrusive deposits are controlled by the United States.
          4. Walk
            Walk 4 March 2014 10: 06 New
            +2
            Those. when the US decides to leave its base on the territory of the country without listening to the president, as is happening in Afghanistan now, then such a government is not puppet, in your opinion?
      5. Dazdranagon
        Dazdranagon 4 March 2014 08: 56 New
        +4
        Quote: Nayhas
        The state remained sovereign within the same boundaries.
        - within the same boundaries - yes, sovereign - no.
      6. andrey_kz
        andrey_kz 4 March 2014 08: 56 New
        +6
        BUT. Climbing somewhere, the United States did not annex the alien territory. The state remained sovereign within the same borders. [/ Quote
        And where did the southern states come from? They bought part, and part won from Mexico
      7. vlad.svargin
        vlad.svargin 4 March 2014 08: 59 New
        +3
        Nayhas (3)
        Well, in addition to GRENADA, the United States has a lot of facts of getting into other people's affairs, here are Iraq and Afghanistan, and Serbia, and Panama ... BUT. Climbing somewhere, the United States did not annex the alien territory. The state remained sovereign within the same borders.

        On the other hand, they established “their government”, their bases and their financial corporations, which on “legal” grounds “milked” the resources of the conquered countries.
      8. alex-s
        alex-s 4 March 2014 09: 14 New
        +5
        BUT. Climbing somewhere, the United States did not annex the alien territory. The state remained sovereign within the same boundaries.

        And Mexico gave them California! fool
        1. Semen Semyonitch
          Semen Semyonitch 4 March 2014 10: 15 New
          +1
          Quote: alex-s
          BUT. Climbing somewhere, the United States did not annex the alien territory. The state remained sovereign within the same boundaries.

          And Mexico gave them California! fool


          Texas...
      9. igor36
        igor36 4 March 2014 09: 28 New
        +5
        None of these countries was a historical part of the United States, unlike the Crimea and Ukraine in general, which were part of Russia. If the United States had a situation as it is now in Crimea, they would have long ago resolved the issue through accession, in spite of anyone's squeals and screams.
      10. demon184
        demon184 4 March 2014 09: 59 New
        +2
        And the meaning of annexation? after the annexation of the local Papuans, they will have to feed, and so he took the assets and let the population cut each other.
      11. stroporez
        stroporez 4 March 2014 11: 22 New
        0
        Quote: Nayhas
        The state remained sovereign within the same borders.
        ------ The state --- this is, first and foremost, PEOPLE. and the number of their Pts staffs has even been reduced.
      12. stroporez
        stroporez 4 March 2014 11: 26 New
        +1
        and more -------- In 1845, the United States annexed the Republic of Texas and recognized Texas as the 28th state of the united state. besides, what can we call land otter among the indigenous population of America ?????? we can safely say that the United States is a state on a stranger land ........
      13. Deniska
        Deniska 4 March 2014 11: 54 New
        +1
        Nayhas (3) RU Today, 07:28 ↑ New
        Quote: major071
        Oh, Americans churkin poked his nose into Grenada, reminded that they never paid attention to other countries, but always applied everything that they needed, and not others. Already tired of these arrogant Saxons.
        Well, in addition to GRENADA, the United States has a lot of facts of getting into other people's affairs, here are Iraq and Afghanistan, and Serbia, and Panama ... BUT. Climbing somewhere, the United States did not annex the alien territory. The state remained sovereign within the same borders.


        You are right they did not divide the territory. BUT they simply set up a howling government and started pumping from the country what they could !!!

        P.C. Crimeans themselves want to secede ... And if they vote in a referendum it is their LEGITIMATE RIGHT TO SELF-DETERMINATION !!!
  8. dmitrij.blyuz
    dmitrij.blyuz 4 March 2014 06: 59 New
    +3
    The UN has lost its objectivity much earlier. Even to Yugoslavia yet. At present, this bunch of inadequate only does everything to try to humiliate and tear Russia apart.
    1. Penzuck
      Penzuck 4 March 2014 07: 24 New
      +2
      While Russia was one big Ruin there is nothing to think about the objectivity of the UN, and now (membership in the Security Council as a pass to the club of superpowers) we can crush them, and it’s a sin to refuse such a cool privilege. And only the Estonian Empire from Lisbon to Vladivostok can humiliate Russia. wink
      In addition, if you consider the time when the Americans, under the UN mandate, invaded one notorious Asian-Pacific country, (Korea), then Attention the SOVIET envoy was boycotting the UN Security Council, and China, in my opinion, was included in the UN only in 1971. And as you know, a single veto is not enough, and all the other members of the Security Council were and still remain US puppets.
  9. Pit
    Pit 4 March 2014 07: 02 New
    11
    "Why does Russia not support international mediators? Why doesn’t it support the idea of ​​sending a mission of international observers? Why doesn’t it enter into direct negotiations with the Ukrainian authorities who want to solve this crisis peacefully?" asked Power.

    What intermediaries? Whom will they represent? What is a cross-national observer mission? What kind of authorities?
    What is she talking about?!?!?
    There is no legitimate authority there !!!
    Intermediaries, missions and others, but only because of them it is necessary to send troops so that this assault landing does not rush and spoil everything completely.
    Do not consider me a racist or someone else (I basically do not like all people), but the United States and England, you need to bomb in the Stone Age. It will be easier for everyone.
    1. Deniska
      Deniska 4 March 2014 12: 20 New
      0
      (I basically do not like all people)


      Even smiled bully
  10. indiggo
    indiggo 4 March 2014 07: 03 New
    11
    this is actually just a show. for us it is such an advantage. AUG is just a shooting gallery for us in the Black Sea ... really
  11. bomg.77
    bomg.77 4 March 2014 07: 03 New
    +8
    Why not enter into direct negotiations with the Ukrainian authorities, who want to solve this crisis peacefully? "- asked Power.
    Russia is talking with the Ukrainian authorities, and these in helmets with shields and smelling of burns are not the Ukrainian authorities.
  12. Ural guys
    Ural guys 4 March 2014 07: 06 New
    +5
    http://www.obltv.ru/news/incidents/naprotiv_konsulstva_ssha_v_jekaterinburge_pro

    gremel_vzryv / - Opposite the US consulate in Yekaterinburg, an explosion occurred.
    Interesting, and who will believe now that gas cylinders exploded?
  13. 528Obrp
    528Obrp 4 March 2014 07: 12 New
    -1
    Hera se

    http://lb.ua/news/2014/03/04/258054_poyavilos_soobshchenie_smerti.html
    The death of Yanukovych. Duck???
    1. Semen Semyonitch
      Semen Semyonitch 4 March 2014 07: 30 New
      0
      Quote: 528Obrp
      Hera se

      http://lb.ua/news/2014/03/04/258054_poyavilos_soobshchenie_smerti.html
      The death of Yanukovych. Duck???


      And not the first freshness.
    2. demel2
      demel2 4 March 2014 07: 38 New
      0
      Quote: 528Obrp
      http://lb.ua/news/

      Credible source? Like AUG in the Black Sea?
  14. Kurdalagon
    Kurdalagon 4 March 2014 07: 16 New
    13
    I apologize if it was already, but I liked it
    1. Oboz
      Oboz 4 March 2014 16: 31 New
      0
      I want a link !!!!!))))))))))))
  15. Egen
    Egen 4 March 2014 07: 18 New
    +1
    Well, really Yanukovych decided, I can’t believe it directly, I dragged on so much time; or who advised? :) It doesn’t matter, the main thing is that the legal field of action is what we are waiting for, Comrade Commander-in-Chief?
    News: US freezes military ties with Russia over events in Ukraine. This is stated in the Pentagon statement circulated by 3 on March http://news.mail.ru/politics/17224900/?frommail=1
    What exactly they themselves do not know yet :), but like we will worry about this :)))
    1. 528Obrp
      528Obrp 4 March 2014 07: 24 New
      0
      If Yanukovych’s death is not a duck, then
      Quote: Egen
      legal field of action

      already out. Is that bad. Very bad.
      Let's hope the duck. Link to this "news" and RBC is
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. siberalt
      siberalt 4 March 2014 07: 31 New
      -1
      Yanukovych has been so puzzled that he is used as they want, depending on the situation. At the press conference, he was against the introduction of any troops into Ukraine. Come on. When he was sitting in Kiev from him the west is still not such a pitchfork. So that the farm is useful. laughing
      1. scientist
        scientist 4 March 2014 08: 01 New
        +4
        Yanukovych is far from kamikaze. Bandera authorities made another mistake by frightening him with the Hague Tribunal. But even a mouse, driven into a corner, can turn into a tiger. What happened.
        1. Name
          Name 4 March 2014 08: 16 New
          0
          At present, the jurisdiction of the court (The Hague Tribunal) does not extend to Ukraine, since the country has not ratified the Rome Statute (an international treaty on the basis of which the International Criminal Court operates). hi
          1. scientist
            scientist 4 March 2014 08: 51 New
            +3
            Tell it to Saddam Hussein and Milosevic hi .
        2. alone
          alone 4 March 2014 19: 42 New
          0
          Do you seriously think that Yanukovych wrote an appeal to Putin about sending troops to Ukraine? He didn’t say such a thing at a press conference. But now it turns out that there is an appeal. Interesting. And yet, by what date is this appeal signed? And why does Putin call the Russian Armed Forces "self-defense of Crimea"? and how do you all think it benefits or harms?
    4. AVIATOR36662
      AVIATOR36662 4 March 2014 07: 56 New
      +3
      Yanukovych now jumps out of the box only when the owner of the snuff box decides. So everything goes according to plan.
  16. Sergg
    Sergg 4 March 2014 07: 19 New
    +8
    The cunning Obama drove his own awl into an ass ... wassat

    Well, that ours will come.
  17. platitsyn70
    platitsyn70 4 March 2014 07: 23 New
    +3
    the southeast should unite to create self-defense to subordinate to itself all the power structures of the Ministry of Internal Affairs, SBU, Sun, and go to Kiev. To disperse temporary patronage to hold a referendum and presidential elections, and Russia will help in this.
  18. individual
    individual 4 March 2014 07: 25 New
    +1
    I consider it a drawback of our diplomacy that it was necessary to immediately provide the public with Yanukovych’s request for the introduction of Russian troops into Ukraine.
    1. AVIATOR36662
      AVIATOR36662 4 March 2014 08: 02 New
      +2
      A request for help and a request for the introduction of troops is, as they say in Odessa: "......" So now: "I beg you!"
  19. Semen Semyonitch
    Semen Semyonitch 4 March 2014 07: 27 New
    +5
    Permanent Representative of Ukraine Yuriy Sergeev said on behalf of the Russian-speaking community of the country that he does not feel any threat and does not see the need for conducting "peacekeeping operations".

    Who is Yuri Sergeyev? And what is this "Russian-speaking community of the country" on whose behalf he makes such statements? That is, the Crimea and the Donbass is not a Russian-speaking community?
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. siberalt
      siberalt 4 March 2014 07: 42 New
      +3
      This Sergeev wanted to say that in Ukraine all the people are Ukrainian-speaking (damn, barely spoken). But in some places there are other language communities, including Russian. And the most interesting - they believe him. Well, stupid!
  20. AleksPol
    AleksPol 4 March 2014 07: 35 New
    +5
    USA got it. At one time, they always told us (and it is) that they are a potential enemy. And now the so-called partners have shown their true face. It is time for us to rely only on ourselves.




    0
    1. waisson
      waisson 4 March 2014 08: 56 New
      +5
      WE WILL SHOW THEM THERE SO
  21. Strashila
    Strashila 4 March 2014 07: 40 New
    +4
    Without a piece of paper, you are a small insect ... but with the appeal of Yanukovych you can go even to the next step.
  22. Snoop
    Snoop 4 March 2014 07: 41 New
    +3
    "Why not enter into direct negotiations with the Ukrainian authorities who want to solve this crisis peacefully?" - asked Power. "The smartest or what? Thus, then the Russian authorities recognize the power in Kiev, and it is not legitimate, which means it is illegal.
  23. sasha.28blaga
    sasha.28blaga 4 March 2014 07: 43 New
    +6
    "If for individual Western politicians Ukraine is only the territory of the geopolitical game, then for us it is a fraternal country with which we are connected by a common centuries-old history."
    why does everyone stubbornly refuse to call Ukraine Russia? Who can say the opposite, that Ukraine is not Russia. Then it becomes unclear why Kiev is the mother of Russian cities, the capital of Russia, or someone wants to say, not Russia, but Russia, so this is the same as the USSR and Russia.
    If we start to convince everyone (the world community of prostitutes) that Ukraine is Russia, then in the end it will. How can Ukraine be a fraternal country? Such a concept does not fit in my head. Ukraine for a while forgot that it is the same Russia and our task is to remind everyone without exception of this.
  24. FC SKIF
    FC SKIF 4 March 2014 07: 45 New
    +3
    Janek is now needed only in order to give legitimacy to our troops. A dumb clown, playing with multi-vector, has lost everything: power, property, money, respect. I would not be surprised if it turns out that Putin does not dictate letters to Yanyk himself, but his driver or maid. Putin openly despises him, and there is a reason. It would not be bad to entrust the golden eagle to protect the VFJ - they would come off to the full.
  25. mojohed2012
    mojohed2012 4 March 2014 07: 56 New
    +5
    If Poland invades Ukraine, If NATO enters the Black Sea with aircraft carriers and large forces, this is a clear red line for Russia, i.e. an occasion for the introduction of troops throughout Ukraine with the elimination of Yarosh and comrades.
    I believe that all this tension is an internal political attempt by the states to add brutality to Obama and his apparatus with the Senate and the State Department, they still will not stop at the show, they want to be the coolest and decisive. Only this decisiveness will lead to the third world war because of the Nazis in Kiev.
    We will not tolerate threats and muscle games. If you have to fight in the last war, we will. But to merge Ukraine is an unambiguous drain of our state.
    1. waisson
      waisson 4 March 2014 09: 06 New
      +9
      MERGING NEVER ELSE WE WILL KNIFE BEFORE THE AMER IN THE EYES OF THE WORLD AND OUR PEOPLE AND THEN OUR CHILDREN WILL PUSH US ABOUT THIS soldier RUSSIA SHOULD BE AFRAID - WILL BE AFRAID WILL BE AND RESPECT soldier
  26. Finik
    Finik 4 March 2014 07: 56 New
    +2
    pendos sy really take us for stupid I do not understand, just for ****** !!!
  27. Mazadrive
    Mazadrive 4 March 2014 08: 06 New
    +1
    It’s not too sick there for the USA to fart) so that saliva is sprayed on Our Great Russia and Slavic Peoples =)

    It won’t reach the war ... but you’ll have to shine your muscles and have to share a weighty word)
  28. ia-ai00
    ia-ai00 4 March 2014 08: 07 New
    +8
    Nayhas (3) RU
    Quote: ia-ai00
    No words ...

    It is strange to hear this from a citizen of Kazakhstan ...

    Somehow you PERSONALLY classify ME as aggressors?
    Your reaction is strange ... I understand if, as I, someone from the Bandera “trinity” would react to the position of the USA and Europe - Klichko, I Tsenyuk or Tyagnibok.
    I AM RUSSIAN, AND I AM NOT INDIFFERENT TO THE FATE OF THE UKRAINIAN PEOPLE!
    And the policy of double standards of the United States and GayRopa in relation to any people, any country on the planet generally kills me.
  29. scientist
    scientist 4 March 2014 08: 09 New
    +5
    Quote: Santor
    Ahead at the end of the tunnel is the military alliance of Iran, Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, China, India and possibly Turkey.

    A good motivation may be the creation of a Eurasian missile defense system. I am sure this will be a good response to Euro-missile defense and the Bandera coup. The SCO has already positioned itself as a military bloc by adopting an “Agreement on cooperation in ensuring information security.” It is necessary to deepen this direction, especially since China, as a member of the UN Security Council, has already proved that it can be a real ally (South Ossetia, Syria, Crimea), in contrast to the amorphous CSTO.
  30. Clegg
    Clegg 4 March 2014 08: 10 New
    -1
    Yanukovych is alive?
    1. Apollo
      Apollo 4 March 2014 09: 17 New
      +2
      Quote: Clegg
      Yanukovych is alive?


      And what does it matter ?! Rather dead than alive. Decaying political corpse !!!
  31. ed65b
    ed65b 4 March 2014 08: 29 New
    +3
    It is necessary to Churkin photo which teary thread to adjust. in the best traditions of the West, let her shake her from the rostrum, show a test tube with salt, a photo from Google Earth. Everything is like in Hollywood. And go ahead.
    1. Apollo
      Apollo 4 March 2014 08: 56 New
      +1
      Good morning everyone hi

      quote-President of Ukraine Viktor Yanukovych appealed to the Russian authorities asking to use their armed forces to ensure constitutional order in his country. This was stated by Permanent Representative of the Russian Federation to the UN Vitaly Churkin, speaking on Monday, March 3, at an open meeting of the Security Council on the situation in Ukraine.

      We analyze in order.
      1. I asked for help. And the gut itself was subtle in putting things in order. He, among other things, had special services, special forces were plus the Armed Forces.
      2. We remember how Prime Minister D. Medvedev publicly stated all that he thinks of Yanukovych. Briefly RAG. It turns out that the Russian government no longer considers Yanukovych to be so or does it still consider it with a reservation ?!

      3. Why Yanukovych is publicly he didn’t say requesting the entry of Russian troops into Ukraine ?!
      Questions, questions, questions. winked
      1. DMB-78
        DMB-78 4 March 2014 09: 01 New
        +1
        Quote: Apollon
        . I asked for help.

        Yes, who asked him laughing without it, GDP decided everything smile
        1. Apollo
          Apollo 4 March 2014 09: 04 New
          0
          Quote: DMB-78
          Yes, who asked him without him GDP decided everything

          One can only guess. Then I will assume that Yanukovych wrote under dictation.
          1. ed65b
            ed65b 4 March 2014 12: 08 New
            +1
            Quote: Apollon
            Quote: DMB-78
            Yes, who asked him without him GDP decided everything

            One can only guess. Then I will assume that Yanukovych wrote under dictation.

            He didn’t even write, but read, and not even he, but Maxim Galkin laughing
        2. ia-ai00
          ia-ai00 4 March 2014 09: 17 New
          0
          YaNuk asked to send troops, apparently, in protect YOURSELF, therefore, not "publicly", he probably was ashamed to shout: - "PUTIN LORD, SAVE ME, poor !!!" ...
  32. alex-s
    alex-s 4 March 2014 09: 00 New
    +1
    "Why not enter into direct negotiations with the Ukrainian authorities who want to solve this crisis peacefully?" asked Power.

    So much more direct ?! Yanukovych in Russia! And there is no other legitimate authority (except Crimea) in Ukraine!

    "The US insists that so far there is no evidence that the Crimean population is threatened by the new Ukrainian authorities, continued the US Permanent Representative to the UN." Military intervention cannot be justified by non-existent threats, "Power said. According to her, "mobilization of the Russian military is a response to a fictional threat

    That is, we need to wait until Bendera cut thousands of Russians ?! angry
  33. DMB-78
    DMB-78 4 March 2014 09: 06 New
    +1
    Quote: alex-s
    That is, we need to wait until Bendera cut thousands of Russians

    yes they at least the whole Ukraine will be cut out only l angry it will become easier
  34. AleksPol
    AleksPol 4 March 2014 09: 10 New
    +9
    Maybe not a lot of the topic, but I can’t keep silent. For all the events in Ukraine, we forgot the mournful date of February 29, 2000. Our guys from the 76th guards airborne assault Chernihiv Red Banner Division took an unequal battle and survived at the cost of life. And who is asked these gangs. Rlo.gi are going to declare war if we have such guys. They have given their lives for the honor and dignity of the Russian soldier.
  35. Flipman
    Flipman 4 March 2014 09: 12 New
    -1
    Quote: Nayhas
    Quote: Semen Semenych
    And what so confuses you in his position?

    On the topic of Ukraine, the forums in Kazakhstan are categorically anti-Russian. Having a large Russian population in the northern regions, the Kazakhs are trying on the situation in Crimea for themselves. Moreover, Kazakhstan is sandwiched between Russia and China and there are fears that Russia will take the north, and China the southern regions. Of course you can laugh at it, but that’s not funny for them. Analyzing the situation in Ukraine, everyone usually looks at messages from Russia, Europe and the USA, while skipping the frank silence of our allies in the CU of Kazakhstan and Belarus ...

    Well, in the south of Kz there are also a lot of Russians, especially in Almaty, and only nationalists who howl more and more with the year raise a howl!
    1. Clegg
      Clegg 4 March 2014 09: 14 New
      -7
      Quote: Flipman
      and howl only nationalists raise

      Here it is not necessary to lie, all against the aggression of Russia
      1. DMB-78
        DMB-78 4 March 2014 09: 24 New
        +3
        Quote: Clegg
        Here it is not necessary to lie, all against the aggression of Russia

        what aggression? where is she?
    2. demon184
      demon184 4 March 2014 10: 24 New
      0
      Our special services hike the markets and do not deal with their duties, since such things are happening here and in neighboring states.
  36. vlad.svargin
    vlad.svargin 4 March 2014 09: 17 New
    +2
    "It is necessary to ensure the fulfillment of the obligations enshrined in the agreement of February 21, including the beginning of the constitutional reform process with the participation and full consideration of all regions of Ukraine," Churkin said, as Interfax reports.

    In fact, the United States and the EU do not even remember this, because they are afraid to recognize in this way the illegality of their recognition of the "Maidan authorities." Even under such circumstances, they do not want to abandon their plans, but with pathos pour "dirt" and threats to Putin. And that Yanukovych is still a legitimate president, not a line. Of course, because of this “cat Leopold” it all started, but the people of Ukraine will deal with him in the future, but for now he is the legitimate president and has the right to get out of chaos this way.
  37. Flipman
    Flipman 4 March 2014 09: 24 New
    +5
    Quote: Clegg
    Here it is not necessary to lie, all against the aggression of Russia

    yes you quit! with whom I communicate, including educated Kazakhs believe that Russians are doing the right thing and don’t think that we can do this! remember the recent unrest in Zhanaozen quickly figured it out! and a new round of anger spilled over from Zhirinovsky about the Central Asian Federal District with the capital in the city of Verny!
  38. pensioner
    pensioner 4 March 2014 09: 25 New
    +1
    The US insists that so far there is no evidence that the Crimean population is threatened by the new Ukrainian authorities, continued the US Permanent Representative to the UN.
    Those. they will receive evidence only when they begin to kill the Russians. And then it will be necessary to prove that they are Russian ...
    1. DMB-78
      DMB-78 4 March 2014 09: 27 New
      0
      Quote: retired
      Those. they will receive evidence only when they begin to kill the Russians. And then it will be necessary to prove that they are Russian ...

      and still you won’t prove it. they will say that we ourselves ...
  39. Gagarin
    Gagarin 4 March 2014 09: 40 New
    +2
    Well, finally, the disgraced Yanukovych came in handy; he is the trump card in the lawful entry of troops FOR THE REQUEST OF THE LAW PRESIDENT.
    1. ia-ai00
      ia-ai00 4 March 2014 10: 16 New
      +1
      And you because Russia would calmly observe because of the "fence" how descendants of the Nazis they kill, mock and humiliate the RUSSIAN-speaking population and establish "their" laws that will put the Russians on their knees before the Nazis?
  40. DMB-78
    DMB-78 4 March 2014 09: 43 New
    +1
    Quote: Gagarin
    Well, finally disgraced Yanukovych came in handy,

    Yes, it generally must be protected as the apple of an eye)))))
  41. Pacifist
    Pacifist 4 March 2014 09: 47 New
    +3
    "Why does Russia not support international mediators? Why doesn’t it support the idea of ​​sending a mission of international observers? Why doesn’t it enter into direct negotiations with the Ukrainian authorities who want to solve this crisis peacefully?" asked Power.

    1. Because precisely these international mediators, hiding behind the pathos of democracy, led to the Nazi Sabbath in Ukraine.
    2. Because international observers have proved their one-sided vision of situations in favor of the hosts and are completely useless for a real solution to the problem.
    3. There are no legitimate Ukrainian authorities, and no self-respecting country will negotiate with the Nazi gopniks, especially after they themselves have violated the agreement the next day by signing.

    And the United States, in addition to Grenada, you can recall the provocations against Vietnam that led to war, lying to the international community in the UN while accusing Iraq of producing WMDs, the war in Yugoslavia on falsified pretexts, support for the drug law barracks in Kosovo, sponsorship of drug producers in Afghanistan ... tired of writing already ... in short, you can advise them so that they put their tongue in a place where the sun does not shine ...
    1. Clegg
      Clegg 4 March 2014 09: 52 New
      0
      Quote: Pacifist
      lying to the international community at the UN while accusing Iraq of producing weapons of mass destruction,

      WMD are not only nuclear weapons, but also chemical and bacteriological. Saddam had chemical weapons, no one can deny this. But nuclear weapons did not find it true.
      1. Walk
        Walk 4 March 2014 10: 42 New
        +1
        The reason was the FORBIDDEN WMD, but one was not found. No need to juggle.
  42. tnk1969
    tnk1969 4 March 2014 09: 52 New
    +2
    In this situation, the Russian leadership itself is largely to blame. Not the people, but the leadership and elite of Russia. After all, for how many years the leadership of Russia connived the United States and its ally around the world. And only thanks to the political impotence of the Russian authorities was Yugoslavia destroyed, Iraq and Libya destroyed. But since recently, and precisely after the events in South Ossetia and Abkhazia, the tops of Russia began to listen more to the aspirations and aspirations of their people. The people felt their Pride for the country, for their History. And in order not to lose this trust, the leadership of Russia should adhere to just such a course. And do not pay attention to these political traitors in the face of the Germans, the new ones and others. Russia has already experienced such Judas (Gorbachev, Yeltsin). The shameful ally of the Russian authorities should be its own people, not the United States or Europe.
    We must also use the "legitimate" president (it would be better if he was called the Prostitute) of Yanukovych. Let him now work out for all his betrayals and crimes. But in no case do not send him to Ukraine, as many here offer. Allegedly, all opponents of the Maydanutykhs rallied around him. And if you send it only to the Crimea, and so that all Berkutovtsy unite around it. This and the protection will be for him and his overseers. And let them guard the one who betrayed them. And they will guard him ...
    And do not be afraid of sanctions from the United States and Europe. This is not a Russian contingent located in Afghanistan. You can simply block the transit of all goods through the airspace of Russia and their CSTO and SCO allies. And then they will think carefully there ...
    And Churkin needs to be shown shots at the UN Security Council where his name, Music or Bilykh, seems to be dictating to officials from the regional administration how to behave ... And how he beats up the district prosecutor ... And then show the appeal of Yarosh to Doku Omarov. I think such clear evidence will make diplomats from other countries think about it. Oh, I forgot to add. It is also necessary to show fragments from the synagogue set up ... Indeed, if you remember History, it was the shots from the death concentration camps that determined the German Nazi’s judge after the Second World War in Nuremberg. Why not return to this practice again. But it is necessary to show this not just in the media, but at the UN Security Council session and at the conference on human rights that is currently being held in Geneva. And then all means disseminate it through its channels ... After all, the Americans have done so more than once. Remember at least the shots where they are trying to prove to the UN that Iraq has weapons of mass destruction ... We must not disdain their own means ...
  43. DMB-78
    DMB-78 4 March 2014 09: 52 New
    +1
    Quote: Pacifist
    3. There are no legitimate Ukrainian authorities, and no self-respecting country will negotiate with the Nazi gopniks

    thereby recognizing their legitimacy
  44. Draz
    Draz 4 March 2014 09: 59 New
    +1
    The number of people with Internet access is huge, BUT this does not mean that everyone will write comments, most are not interested, among those who are interested, most do not want to understand the intricacies. A bunch of comments, and almost no adequate. None of the authorities read your comments, they do not affect decision making. This does not preclude the right to your opinion.

    My opinion.
    Joining any parts of Russia is not profitable as well as the Nazi government in Ukraine. Sasha Bely is more useful alive than dead. Are you daring?

    At the very beginning in Crimea there were calls for joining Russia, and now where are they (calls)? We are talking only about expanding autonomy and the possibility of the Crimea itself to choose with whom to be friends, while being part of Ukraine. Why did the opinion change so dramatically? Are you afraid? Whom? OR made it clear that it is impossible to violate the integrity of Ukraine.
    I made this conclusion from the thesis of comrades from our Foreign Ministry that Russia upholds international law, the annexation of Ukraine is behavior that is unworthy of purpose. In addition, not all Ukrainians want to be part of the Russian Federation, but they do not support Natsik. The option when Ukraine remains intact and at the same time without Nazi power is ideal.
    Ukrainians themselves will be grateful to the Russian Federation for their support in difficult times, neighbors (Kazakhs, Belarusians, Europeans) will see that the Russian Federation does not hunt for their territories and in case of trouble we will come to the rescue, we are right and we are doing everything according to the law, because it’s rude to substitute ourselves - it is the destiny of the exceptional.
  45. stroporez
    stroporez 4 March 2014 10: 04 New
    +2
    "... The secret was discovered by the assistant secretary of the US State Department Victoria Nuland, whom the journalists once dubbed" the burning cap of Washington. "In December, she admitted that her country spent" $ 5 billion on the development of democracy in Ukraine ... "from and it turns out that sho Maidan is a purely paid "tusnya" and there was no "will of the people" of "democracy" and other nishtyaks there and there ........
    1. 528Obrp
      528Obrp 4 March 2014 10: 25 New
      +1
      Quote: stroporez
      somehow dubbed the "burning hat of Washington."

      In the sense of a talkative pi ..
  46. Vesnjanka
    Vesnjanka 4 March 2014 10: 59 New
    -1
    Quote: Gagarin
    Well, finally, the disgraced Yanukovych came in handy; he is the trump card in the lawful entry of troops FOR THE REQUEST OF THE LAW PRESIDENT.

    Same thing to me, Hafizullah Amin!
  47. polkovnik manuch
    polkovnik manuch 4 March 2014 11: 00 New
    +1
    The USA has frozen military cooperation with Russia .... WELL AND WHAT?! Well, we won’t sell them badly needed rocket engines, helicopters, we’ll freeze a project with a transshipment base and something else, we have an old saying: “Century poppy did not give birth and there wasn’t hunger, "as a rule, Russia always used the imposed evil to good use, at that time all the country's internal capabilities were sharply activated, but the" fifth column "- immediately, by the will of the people, naturally" falls below the plinth ", which is now extremely necessary to do, pinched something on the neoliberals door! Yanukovych - what no, but legally elected president asked for help, we are faithful allies, here we are helping, moreover, both the Americans and the EU themselves understand that banderlogs are a very big evil, and they want Russia to "put a pig" again. All world players are well aware - Rolssia, with its natural resources, scientific (sometimes even the Soviet backlogs) can do without them and survive and, together with China, India, Brazil, a number of other countries, can continue to build a multipolar world. Well, the gunboat policy "in such an indoor pool as the Black Sea is just an empty phrase, even sorry, not PUUCH! And we will benefit from this - the personnel of the troops and the fleet will conduct additional training to test the combat readiness and coordination of actions.
  48. bomg.77
    bomg.77 4 March 2014 11: 15 New
    +1
    News: Vladimir Putin ordered the troops participating in the exercises to return to their locations
    1. Walk
      Walk 4 March 2014 12: 24 New
      0
      Where is the droushka?
  49. nod739
    nod739 4 March 2014 13: 10 New
    0
    Quote: bomg.77
    We are talking about the nuclear carrier “George W. Bush” and the escort group of 16 ships and three nuclear submarines

    if they violate the convention on the Bosphorus and the Dardonelles, then the Turks will also have to restore constitutional order
    ....
    just do it fake, the Black Sea is a puddle that shoots from coast to coast, and if aug enters there, the Mediterranean will be left without mattress control))
  50. Leshka
    Leshka 4 March 2014 13: 29 New
    0
    ours have recently become bolder