Inspectors of the United States and France will perform an observation flight over the territory of Russia

27
Inspectors of the United States and France will perform an observation flight over the territory of Russia

In the period from 3 to 8 in March, within the framework of the implementation of the International Treaty on Open Skies, the joint mission of the United States and France will perform an observation flight over the territory of the Russian Federation on a US observation plane OC-135B.

It will pass along the agreed route in the presence of Russian specialists on board, who will monitor compliance with the agreed flight parameters and application of the monitoring equipment provided for by the Treaty.

Observation aircraft OS-135B refers to the type of aircraft not equipped with any weapons. The aircraft and the surveillance equipment installed on us (aerial cameras) underwent an international certification, which was also attended by Russian specialists, which precludes the use of technical equipment not covered by the Open Skies Treaty.
27 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    3 March 2014 12: 01
    Will we fly over the United States with similar missions?
    1. +6
      3 March 2014 12: 06
      Yes, we will be over Canada too.
      1. AVV
        0
        3 March 2014 16: 52
        They want to check the location of our troops on the southern borders of Russia !!! What are they already missing satellites ???
    2. +4
      3 March 2014 12: 07
      The Open Skies Treaty, DON is a multilateral international treaty signed on March 24, 1992 in Helsinki by representatives of 23 OSCE member states. The purpose of the treaty is to help build confidence between states through improving mechanisms for monitoring military activities and compliance with existing arms control treaties. The agreement establishes an open skies regime, the purpose of which is to provide an opportunity for its participants to fly over each other's territories.
      To date, the parties to the Agreement are 33 states. The Russian Federation ratified the Open Skies Treaty of 26 on May 2001.
      1. +1
        3 March 2014 12: 10
        Quote: Duke
        open skies clause, DON is a multilateral international treaty signed on March 24, 1992 in Helsinki

        Actually already. Here the Americans are threatening that soon the borders will be closed, and we are talking about the open sky.
  2. +3
    3 March 2014 12: 05
    This is a fucking legacy and that’s it.
  3. +1
    3 March 2014 12: 06
    Well, men, well, you can’t get anywhere here, of course such a situation infuriates, but there will be a huge reason for West European trolling if we refuse such overflights, especially in our presence.
  4. +4
    3 March 2014 12: 08
    It is no coincidence that a date was chosen.
    They need to inflate the thumb model, let them look at what kind of new developments Russia has in service. Yes
    1. 0
      3 March 2014 18: 04
      Not big, but medium - so it will be "clearer" for them ...
  5. 0
    3 March 2014 12: 09
    And ours are flying. Recently there was infa that the Tu-204OV plane was received just for such missions ..
    1. 0
      3 March 2014 17: 57
      Quote: maestro123
      They need to inflate the thumb model, let them examine what kind of new developments Russia has in service

      Do you mean the longest - middle finger?
  6. +3
    3 March 2014 12: 11
    Where are our inflatable tanks?
    1. +2
      3 March 2014 14: 06
      Quote: Hnikar
      Where are our inflatable tanks?

      And this is an idea laughing Inflate half a million tanks, they take pictures, throw a hysterics, and at this moment it is necessary (sincerely surprised) to invite them to the ground to make sure that there are no tanks (tanks, of course, to blow off and hide), then repeat this scenario substituting inflatable tanks for the spy satellite, international flights and in general any curious photographic lens, and for every cry invite "to check for yourself" that there are no tanks.
      I wonder after what round their brain will break, in an attempt to understand where and how to hide half a million tanks so quickly? wassat
      1. Igmail
        +1
        3 March 2014 15: 01
        laughed heartily. +
      2. -1
        3 March 2014 16: 51
        To begin with, we will pay $ 7 billion for half a million inflatable tanks and we will already laugh at us.
        1. 0
          3 March 2014 18: 15
          Well, you, Citizen, bent! Well, at most - 1000 green for one inflatable "armored vehicle". Total - half a lard. Bargained?
          1. 0
            3 March 2014 19: 31
            In 2011, the cost of one inflatable layout of the tank left 490 thousand rubles. These are official numbers.
      3. 0
        3 March 2014 18: 08
        Fooling "partners" is aerobatics!
  7. KOH
    0
    3 March 2014 12: 12
    Nah .. they’ll let them in here !!! WE are always open-hearted, and they have a skeleton in the closet ...
  8. Leshka
    0
    3 March 2014 12: 15
    what for do we need them
  9. 0
    3 March 2014 12: 17
    what a strange airplane. take a closer look. the engines are interestingly mounted and the wings are not visible
    1. 0
      3 March 2014 12: 45
      Quote: spec-80
      what a strange airplane. take a closer look. the engines are interestingly mounted and the wings are not visible

      What is strange about him? request This is a Boeing 707 (a rarity, by the way)

      The Boeing-707 is the first in the United States and one of the world's first jet airliners.

      The ability of the aircraft to land over 950 km without landing at a speed of 6000 km / h allowed it to become the main long-haul aircraft of the world's leading airlines in the 1960s and 70s.
      Characteristics of the aircraft:

      dimensions
      Length (m) 44.0
      Wingspan (m) 39.9
      Height (m) 12.7
      Wing area (sq.m) 226.0

      The weight
      Max. takeoff weight (kg) 116 700
      Max. landing weight (kg) 86 200
      Empty weight (kg) 58
      Max. weight without fuel (kg) 77 100
      Max. payload (kg) 19 300
      Max. fuel capacity (kg) 65 700

      flight data
      Flight range with max. load (km) 6 700
      Max. cruising speed (km/h) 965
      P&W JT3D-1 engines, 4 x 7700 kgf

      The passenger compartment
      Number of seats (economy) 174
      Number of seats (economy / business) 137
      Cabin length (m) 31.9
      Cabin width (m) 3.56
      Cabin height (m) 2.38
  10. +1
    3 March 2014 12: 24
    In connection with the events in Ukraine, Russia could temporarily postpone observation flights over its territory.
  11. 0
    3 March 2014 12: 26
    That's where you need inflatable military equipment and fake radars made from household microwave ovens.
  12. -1
    3 March 2014 12: 29
    Ukraine declared the sky over its country to be prohibited for flights of military aircraft. We must offer them to fly over Ukraine, well, and allow the Ukrainians to bring down this piece of iron over their territory.
  13. 0
    3 March 2014 12: 30
    It’s strange, somehow, that they fly over our territory eight or twelve times a year, and we don’t hear anything about our flights over their territory. only from unverified sources that flew a couple of times somewhere away from their borders! ??? sad
  14. 0
    3 March 2014 12: 54
    oh no time now THESE friends LET over our fly!
    INFLATABLE TANKS AND NUCLEAR warheads need to be POOLED AND put where possible!
  15. 120352
    0
    3 March 2014 13: 04
    Shoot down the right.
    1. +1
      3 March 2014 14: 14
      There are our observers on board, if they are told with parachutes to board suspicions arise.))
  16. 0
    3 March 2014 16: 03
    yes, by chance let the rocket fly out as it was with Kuchma if I’m not mistaken and then the geyropa will understand who she has fed her breasts, it will happen by chance so after all, gay Mr. Yatsenyuk!
  17. 0
    3 March 2014 18: 19
    And for what disrespectful reason, they did not simultaneously report the flights of our inspectors over the territory of France and the USA? What kind of impermissible one-sidedness?