According to the aforementioned decree, the amnesty applies to the majority of juvenile offenders, disabled people of groups I and II, women with dependent children, pregnant women, men and women of retirement age. In addition, military personnel and law enforcement officers and the PWS system who participated in the defense of the Fatherland (including hostilities), as well as the liquidators of the Chernobyl NPP accident, fall under the amnesty.
A special emphasis is placed on the fact that the amnesty applies to persons convicted and suspected (accused) under the articles of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation: No. XXUMX “Mass riots”, No. XXUMX “Hooliganism”, No. XXUMX “Violation of traffic rules and operation of vehicles”.
Separate 10 section in the resolution №3500-6 DG highlighted the articles of the Criminal Code and the points convicted or accused persons for whom will not be amnestied in the event of non-compliance with the above points by age, status, health status:
105, 111, part of the second article of 117, part of the third article of 122, article of 126, part of the third article of 127, part of the second article of 128, articles of 131, 132, part of the second article of 133, articles of 134, 135, 146, 147 , h. third and fourth article 150, h. third and fourth article 158, h. third and fourth article 159, h. third and fourth article 160, h. second and third article 161, article 162, h. second and third article 163, article 164, part three and four of the article 166, articles 169, XNUMP, 170, 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 183, 184, 185, 186, 187, 189, 190, 191, 192, 193, 194, 195, 196, 197, 198, 199, 200, 205, 206, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 215, 221, 222, 223, 226, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, 234, 240, 241, 264, 275, 276. , 277, 278, 279, 281, 282, 286, 290, 291, 295, 296, 299, 300, 301, 305 , 306, 309, 313, h. The first article 317, h. The third article 318, articles 321, 322, h. The first, second and third article 329, articles 333, 335, 353, 354, 355, 356, 357, 358 , 359, 360, h. The second, third, fourth, fifth and sixth article XNUMX, articles XNUMX, XNUMX, XNUMX, XNUMX, XNUMX, XNUMX, XNUMX, h. The third article XNUMX, articles XNUMX, XNUMX, XNUMX, XNUMX, XNUMX , XNUMX, part two of the second and third article XNUMX, part two of the second article XNUMX, part three of the article XNUMX, part four of the article XNUMX, articles XNUMX, XNUMX, XNUMX, XNUMX, XNUMX, XNUMX, XNUMX, XNUMX, XNUMX, XNUMX, XNUMX, XNUMX, XNUMX, XNUMX XNUMX, XNUMX, XNUMX, XNUMX, XNUMX, XNUMX.
The question that worried the public before the release of the announced resolution of the State Duma and which continues to be, so to say, on the agenda: whether this amnesty concerns our old acquaintances. This, of course, is about the ex-minister of defense of Anatolia Serdyukov and his scandalous “battalion”, one of the most prominent representatives of which is Mrs. Vasilyeva, who once headed the Department of Property Relations of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation. It is worth noting that in respect of this lady extended house arrest, and in addition, she was forbidden to communicate with the press and other persons on the subject of a criminal case. In general, you want to talk to Vasilyeva, for example, about love - please, but about criminality - no gugu! By the way, about love ... Evgeny Vasilyev is quoted by the RSN:
Everyone probably knows that I have a personal relationship with a former defense minister. They arose after I left the ministry. When they came to me with a search, I had not worked there for half a year.
As they say, love inadvertently descended ... I still thought a little bit - and just Monica Lewinsky ...
Before discussing this topic, it is necessary to recall that Anatoly Serdyukov is being accused of negligence today, according to the investigation allowed by Serdyukov on the construction of the road to the Zhitnoye recreation center and landscaping of the base itself. The first clause has been selected for Anatoly Serdyukov's clause of the article 293 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Evgenia Vasilyeva is accused of the following articles of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation: No. 159 (part 3) “Fraud on a large scale”, No. 174 (“Legalization of funds or other property acquired by other persons by criminal means”), No. XXUMX (“Abuse of power” ), №285 ("Excess of office").
Comparing the numbers and paragraphs of the articles for which these characters are accused, with the numbers of articles for which convicted and accused are awaited by the amnesty, the following picture is obtained: Anatoly Serdyukov can directly fall under the amnesty while Evgenia Nikolaevna Vasilyeva with her “ladies’ set ”can be“ under amnesty ”only if she a) is either pregnant, b) or an invalid of I and II groups, c) or Eugenia Vasilyeva has a“ liquidator crust ”( at the time of likv dations she was 7 years) - as an alternative ...
It should be noted that immediately after the adoption of the decision on amnesty, representatives of the Duma Committee on Criminal Legislation made statements and stated that the ex-Minister of Defense would not apply the amnesty. Only here said a few in a strange way. The words of the representative of the committee Pavel Krasheninnikov passes Interfax:
Probably, in the company of Serdyukov there may be pregnant women and women with minor children, but, probably, this citizen himself is not affected.
If the first “probably” can be associated with deputy irony or the usual ignorance about pregnant women and other women surrounded by the ex-minister, then the second “probably” in this case is completely incomprehensible. It turns out that the legislators adopted an amnesty decree, but they themselves do not know who it is for it that can amnesty, and therefore build some strange conjectures. I wonder who, then, will ultimately make a concrete decision on the “fate” of the ex-minister, even if the deputies who worked on the final draft of the amnesty do not go beyond the term “probably” ...
Meanwhile, one of Anatoly Serdyukov’s lawyers, Heinrich Padva, states that his client may well use his chance of being amnestied. At the same time, Padva notes that the final decision will be made by Serdyukov, placing particular emphasis on the non-rehabilitative nature of the amnesty. They say that amnesty is not an excuse, but Anatoly Eduardovich is firmly determined to completely “wash out” his uniform smeared with “untenable” accusations. Another lawyer of Serdyukov, Konstantin Rivkin, says that his client has affairs and is more important than some kind of amnesty - both of them are busy studying the 56 volumes of the criminal case.
But, arguing about the amnesty for the former officials of the Ministry of Defense, we, in fact, are gradually slipping to another level. If yesterday, the day before yesterday, the reasoning went in the plane of “blaming - not blaming”, “planting - not planting” and “where did the money go”, then today there is already a temptation to turn to the topic “legally forgive - legally forgive”. The project of this amnesty, elegantly “taking” each of us under the arm, leads to the “necessity” of discussing a completely different question than the question that most people were initially concerned about. The situation turns into the following: gentlemen and comrades, here’s an amnesty project, discuss it, but do not go into questions like “where is money, Zin” - pressure, good, will rise or indigestion will manifest itself ...
That is, the public, which did not give a damn about what funds were flown out of the defense budget during one of the stages of reforming the Russian army, receives a new dominant - the dominant in the form of an amnesty - to communicate with each other and digest all related issues. A sort of new red rag, which is now waving so much that everybody pay attention to it willy-nilly. And yet fewer people ask questions: friends! What are you talking about? What amnesty? Carry out the investigation to the end, do not wash some criminal episodes, put the embezzlers in the dock!
Let's not forget that the amnesty itself, in addition, also blurs the boundaries between crimes of various directions and scope, as it blurs the boundaries and between the persons who committed them. It turns out that if the amnesty comes to the same Vasilyev, then it will be the former head of the defense property department somewhere between the “singers" from Pussy Rayot and the Greenpeace activists. They say nothing serious is so ... toys ... never mind ... From the point of view of psychology, the course is, of course, amazing!